HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda - 06-05-1995 - VIII-G 1
ORANGE C O U N T Y
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
ACTION AGENDA ITEM ABSTRACT
Meeting Date: June 5, 1995
Action Agenda
Item #_y
SUBJECT: CHASE HOLLOW - PRELIMINARY PLAT
ACTION BY: July 11, 1995
DEPARTMENT: PLANNING PUBLIC HEARING Yes _x—No
ATTACHMENT(S) : INFORMATION CONTACT: Jim Hinkley
X2584
Application
Resolution of Approval TELEPHONE NUMBERS:
Vicinity Map
Private Road Justification Hillsborough - 732-8181
Staff Evaluation of Private Durham - 688-7331
Road Justification Mebane - 227-2031
Fiscal Impact Analysis Chapel Hill - 967-9251
Preliminary Plat
Planning Board Minutes Draft
PURPOSE: To consider the Preliminary Plan for Chase Hollow
Subdivision.
BACKGROUND: The property is located on the east side of New Sharon
Church Road south of Walker Road, in Eno Township. It is
zoned AR Agricultural-Residential and is in the L-ENO-PW
protected watershed overlay district. The tract is
designated Agricultural-Residential in the Land Use
Element of the Comprehensive Plan.
Fourteen lots are proposed, ranging in size from 1.95 to
2.60 acres. All lots will be served by individual wells
and septic tanks. Access is provided by a Class A private
road. Private road justification is attached.
An intermittent creek requiring a 90-foot stream buffer,
skirts the western side of the subdivision. It runs
generally parallel with New Sharon Church Road. .
The Planning Board reviewed the Concept Plan on February
20, 1995. The Plan was approved with a Class A Private
Road with the following conditions:
1. Access to all lots must be limited to Mallory Court;
and
2. Payment in lieu of donating land for park and
recreation purposes will be made by the developer.
2
At its regular meeting of May 15, 1995, the Planning Board
reviewed the Preliminary Plan and recommended it to the
Board of County Commissioners with the two abovementioned
conditions and those contained in the attached Resolution
of Approval.
RECOMMNDATION: The Administration recommends approval of the Preliminary
Plan for Chase Hollow per the attached Resolution of
Approval.
APPL' -t4TION FOR CONCEPT PLAN APPROVAL 3
PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT (INK ONLY) MAJOR SUBDIVISION 2/89
ORANGE COUNTY
DATE:
SUBDIVISION NAME: tac 12 e c�
LOCATION: Lc_ ` -ci uvN e
OWNER/DEVELOPER/AGENT: ) , ee,
ADDRESS: O ' �-yt, S t' TELEPHONE NO.:
i L
A. SUMMARY INFORMATION:
Orange County Tax Map 13 BLock Lot(s) Z Township [C p a
Zoning District(s):
Total Number of Acres: Phases:
Total Number of Lots: �� Average Lot Size: Z 44 Minimum Lot Size O lsz
Number/Type of Structures: (existing) (proposed)
Lineal Feet in Streets: I/15 O— Acres in Open Space
Water Supply: U-1 -e L�� Public (specify) Community !/ Individual
Wastewater Disposal: kC t%w Public (specify) Community &.-I- Individual
School District: Fire District:
General Land Uses in Area:
Critical Areas: stream/drainageways flood prone areas
watershed (specify) It'O historic sites
other (explain)
B. A Concept Plan shall be drawn in black ink or pencil to a scale of not less than two hundred (200) feet to the
inch. The scale chosen shall be large enough to show all required detail clearly and legibly. The plan shall
ccntain the following information:
A sketch vicinity map showing the The plotted boundaries of the tract from deeds or
<; location of the subdivision in >`•: maps of record and the portion of the tract to be
relation to the existing street or subdivided
a :a
highway system : ''•'''' '' General descriptions of existing and proposed land
Th e total acreage to be subdivided ::: uses within the subdivision and the existing uses
tax map, block and lot number ;ti of land adjoining it, including but not limited to
reference :> readily identifiable easements, burial grounds,
v The proposed street layout within :: existing structures, natural areas, floodplain and
E =ri the subdivision, including travelway watershed boundaries, railroad and street rights-
41 W 2 and right-of-way widths, and ? of-way, major wood lines, water supply and sewage
�+ O #: connection to existing streets '•`:'::disposal lines, and storm drainage facilities which
The proposed arrangement of lots can be determined from aerial photographs, maps of
.
++ k�+ within the subdivision, including .*-:record, State/Federal resource maps, and local
size and number -planning documents
' `' ` The name, address and telephone Scale, approximate north arrow and date of plat
i::v:::; :;^ number of the subdivider or owner preparation
p ponsibLe for / Name of subdivision
�C Q! ...... .r.: and the arson res y :c��i��.�:c'>�
the subdivision design ��',•-><`' Sixteen copies of the Concept Plan
V y One copy of the sppr Hate Orange :.••.•.
ounty Tax Map
APP CANT'SSSIGNATURE OWNER'S SIGNATURE
I - r2
DATE DATE
4
RESOLUTION
OF THE
ORANGE COUN'T'Y BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
Date: June 5, 1995
Name of Subdivision : Chase Hollow Major Subdivision
Owner/Applicant: J.D. Cecil/Chase Hollow Partnership
The Board of County Commissioners hereby approves Chase Hollow Subdivision preliminary plat,
dated April 4, 1995 and containing 14 lots, to be served by a Class A private road.
Before the Final Plat of any phase of Chase Hollow can be recorded, the following requirements must
be completed:
A. Sewage Disposal
1. Each residential lot shall contain an adequate area for septic disposal, and repair area,
approved by the Orange County Division of Environmental Health.
2. Disclosure that the septic system location may restrict the size and location of
improvements. This disclosure shall be included in a document describing development
restrictions to be recorded concurrently with the Final Plat. The document shall also
disclose that information regarding the tentative location of septic systems is available
from the Orange County Health Department, Division of Environmental Health.
B. Roads and Access
1. Mallory Court shall be constructed to Class A private road standards within a 50-foot
right-of-way.
Mallory Court shall be inspected, and the construction certified in writing to the
Orange County Planning Department by a North Carolina Professional Engineer, or a
North Carolina Registered Land Surveyor. The location of the travelway within the
platted private road right-of-way shall also be certified.
OR
A letter of credit, escrow agreement, or bond shall be submitted to secure construction
and inspection of Mallory Court to Class A private road standards. An estimate of the
construction and certification costs must be prepared by a certified/licensed engineer or
grading contractor and submitted to the Planning and Inspections Department. The
financial guarantee must reflect 110% of that estimate and be issued by an accredited
financial institution licensed to do business in North Carolina
The document describing development restrictions to be recorded with the Final Plat
shall state that the financial guarantee will not be released until the road construction
has been certified by a North Carolina Professional Engineer or a North Carolina
Registered Land Surveyor.
1
2. An erosion control plan for construction of the roads shall be submitted by the
applicant for review and approval by the Orange County Erosion Control Division.
t
3. A Private Road Maintenance Agreement for Mallory Court shall be submitted to the
• 5
Planning and Inspections Department and approved by the County Attorney.
4. A provision that there be no further subdivision of any lot created by this subdivision
shall be included in a document describing development restrictions and requirements
to be prepared by Planning Staff and recorded concurrently with the Final Plat.
5. A 10'by 70'sight triangle and a 50'X 100' taper triangle shall be shown on shall be
shown on the south side of the entrance of the subdivision ion accordance with NCDOT
design standards.
6. All lots shall access onto Mallory Court. This restriction shall be stated in a document
describing development restrictions and requirements to be prepared by Planning Staff
and recorded concurrently with the Final Plat.
7. Approved street name signs shall be erected at the intersection of streets as required
in Section IV-B-3-c-12 of the Orange County Subdivision Regulations. Evidence shall
be submitted by the applicant that the sign is in place or a copy of the receipt for
purchase of the sign shall be submitted to the Planning Department.
C. Land Use Buffers and Landscaping
1. Landscaping shall be installed or preserved as indicated on the approved landscape
plan, and must be inspected and approved by the Planning and Inspections
Department.
OR
The applicant shall secure landscape requirement installation and preservation through
a letter of credit, escrow agreement, or bond. An estimate of the cost for required
preservation, plantings and their installation must be provided. The financial
guarantee shall reflect 110% of the estimate and be issued by an accredited financial
institution licensed to do business in North Carolina
2. Provisions for protection of existing trees as shown on the approved landscape plan
shall be included in a document describing development restrictions and requirements
to be prepared by Planning Staff and recorded concurrently with the Final Plat.
3. A Type A Land Use Buffer shall be provided along New Sharon Church Road. The
buffer shall be 30 in width and provide sufficient vegetation to meet the standards of
Section IV-B-S-e of the Subdivision Regulations. Said buffer shall be so noted on the
plat, and described in a document describing development restrictions and
requirements to be prepared by Planning Staff'and recorded concurrently with the
Final Plat.
D. Drainage
1. Impervious surface shall be limited to no more than 24% of each lot, pursuant to
Article 6.23 of the Zoning Ordinance This restriction shall be included in a document
describing development restrictions and requirements to be prepared by Planning Staff
and recorded concurrently with the Final Plat.
2. A stream buffer shall be provided for a width of 90 feet along the intermittent stream
near the entrance to the subdivision. The width of the buffer shall be stated on the
face of the plat. Development restrictions within the buffer shall be specified in a
document describing development restrictions and requirements to be prepared by
Planning Staff and recorded concurrently with the Final Plat.
6
E. Parkland
1. Cash in the amount of$1,204 shall be paid to Orange County as payment in lieu of
parkland dedication.
F. Miscellaneous
1. The Final Plat shall contain a title block and vicinity map in accordance with Section
V-D-2 and V-D-3 of the Orange County Subdivision Regulations.
2. The following natural and man-made site features shall be shown on the plat:
a. Streams
b. Houses, barns, sheds
C. Utility lines
3. A setback of 55 feet shall be maintained as measured from the edge of right-of-way of
Mallory Court. Side yards and rear yards shall be a minimum of 35 feet. These
setback requirements shall be stated on the plat, and in a document describing
development restrictions and requirements to be prepared by Planning Staff'and
recorded concurrently with the Final Plat.
G. Certifications
1. A Certificate of Survey and Accuracy signed by a registered Land Surveyor shall be
notarized on the face of the Final Plat.
2. A Certificate of Declaration and Maintenance in the form provided in Section V-D-6-b
of the Orange County Subdivision Regulations signed by the landowner and developer
shall be on the face of the plat and included in a document describing development
restrictions to be recorded concurrently with the Final Plat.
3. The Department of Environmental Health shall certify that each lot contains a suitable
area for septic disposal.
4. A Certificate of Approval signed by the Orange County Planning and Inspections
Department.
Signature of Applicant Clerk to the Board
I, , accept the above listed conditions of subdivision approval, and
acknowledge that each must be met prior to recordation of the final plat.
Vicinly-
7M 5. 3 .• 2
)4#11aw
KER
R
1 0
1 -
1
r
1
i
1 & -
co
to
1
1
Eno
8
PRIVATE ROAD JUSTIFICATION
FOR 0
CHASE ACRES S_ O
v
TAX MAP 15. 13. .2 - PIN #9886-60-2358 G�
I
This private road justification for the 50 foot proposed
private drive located in the proposed subdivision on the east side
of New Sharon Church Road (State Road 1538) addresses the criteria
on pages 30a and 30b of the Orange County Subdivision Regulations
(Revised October 16, 1990) .
The private drive (Mallory Court) will be built to Class A
standards according to Orange County Subdivision Regulations. This
private road will be serving the proposed 14 lots. A perpetual
Road Maintenance Agreement will be submitted with the final map and
recorded at the Orange County Register of Deeds Office upon final
approval by the County Attorney. Also upon final approval, a road
sign will be put in place.
The design of this subdivision preserves the rural character
by doubling the minimum lot size. Also, each lot in this
subdivision will have setbacks greater than required (55' front,
35' side and rear) . This property is approximately one-third open
and two-thirds wooded with large hardwoods. The large hardwoods
will be preserved by restrictive covenants prohibiting clear
cutting of any wooded lot.
No open space or recreation area will be dedicated, payment
will be made in lieu.
Restrictive covenants will be put on record prohibiting any
further subdividing of this property.
This property is located in the Lower Eno Watershed; therefore,
a private road with lot sizes doubling the minimum will decrease
the amount of impervious surface and minimize the amount of storm
water run-off.
Y
9
STAFF EVALUATION OF PRIVATE ROAD JUSTIFICATION
SUBDIVISION: Chase Acres - Concept Plan
DATE: January 10, 1995
The standards contained in the Subdivision Regulations pertaining to public and private
roads are listed below. Planning Staff comments regarding each is provided in italics.
IV-B-3-d-1. Roads - Public roads are generally required in all subdivisions and will be
required where it is found that:
1. The subdivision roads would be accepted by the State for
maintenance if:
a) They are built in a manner which satisfies the minimum State
design and construction criteria for subdivision roads;
If Mallory Court is built to NCDOT standards, it could be
accepted by the State as required residential densities are met.
and
b) They would satisfy other requirements for addition to the
State maintenance system, including, but not limited to, the
general density standard of at least two occupied residences
for each one-tenth of a mile of subdivision road.
A road less than one mile in length must provide access for at
least five occupied permanent residences and have a minimum
density of two houses per 1/10 mile. Mallory Court would serve
14 residences when fully developed on a 1,700 foot (1/3 mile)
road with a density of four houses per 1/10 mile.
2. The subdivision roads extend existing roads which are public;
Mallory Court does not extend existing public roads.
or
1
' 10
3. The subdivision roads are part of a development which is located in
an area designated as Urban or Transition on the Orange County
Comprehensive Plan;
Chase Acres is not located in a designated Urban or Transition Area.
or
4. A proposed road is designated as an arterial or collector street on
an approved Thoroughfare Plan for a municipality or in the Orange
County Comprehensive Plan;
Mallory Court in neither designated as an arterial nor as a collector.
or
5. The subdivision roads are part of a non-residential development
consisting of office, retail, industrial, and similar businesses, each
located on a separate lot. This provision shall only apply to that
portion of a subdivision being developed for non-residential
purposes.
Chase Acres is planned to be exclusively residential.
However, private roads may be allowed in a subdivision where, in the
judgment of the Planning Board and with the approval of the Board of
County Commissioners, it is found that the nature and location of the
subdivision with respect to other development and the Comprehensive Plan
are such that a private road is justified.
In determining whether to permit private roads in subdivisions, the
following design features will be considered:
1. The location and design of the subdivision is such that it clearly
preserves the rural character of the County through:
a. The provision of lot sizes and building setback lines
significantly greater than required by ordinance provisions.
For example, if the minimum required lot size is 40,000
square feet (.92 a), and each lot contains at least 80,000
square feet (1.84 a) compliance is assured;
All lots in Chase Acres are proposed to be more than two times
the minimum lot size for the AR Zoning District. Proposed
building setback lines (55' on the front and 35' on the sides and
rear) exceed zoning minimums.
and/or
2
11
b. The retention and/or provision of landscaping and use of
clustering of dwelling units to screen the view of the
subdivision from public roads, maintain a wooded or forested
character, maintain scenic views, or preserve wildlife,
botanical, historic, archaeological and/or recreation sites;
Chase Acres is wooded. Proposed dwelling units will be located
away from Mallory Court and screened by existing trees.
Mallory Court will cross the stream at an approximate 600 to
preserve the wooded area along the intermittent stream.
2. The number, location and/or size of lots to be located in the
subdivision are such that, even if constructed to State standards, the
streets would not be accepted by the State for maintenance due to
density or other State requirements.
Upon buildout, the subdivision will meet NCDOT density requirements
for Mallory Court.
3. Recreation and/or open space areas, including lands containing
significant botanical, wildlife, historic and/or archaeological sites, are
to be dedicated and/or preserved through restrictive covenants in
amounts significantly greater than required by standards for
recreation/open space dedication.
No recreation/open space areas are designated.
4. Significantly larger than required stream buffers and lot sizes, and/or
other design features are proposed as part of a subdivision to be
located in a Protected Watershed as designated on the Orange
County Comprehensive Plan to reduce the amount of impervious
surface and cause infiltration of storm water runoff to prevent the
pollution of water supply reservoirs.
The property is situated in the Lower Eno Protected Watershed. There
is a required stream buffer of 100' along the intermittent creep
generally bordering the western limits of the proposed subdivision. Lot
sizes, along the streams, are larger than required which will reduce the
amount of impervious surface.
5. Topographic and environmental features, such as streams, steep
slopes, or watersheds, that would be adversely affected by the use of
roads constructed to State standards because of factors such as
significant amounts of earthwork (cut and fill) that would contribute
to increased run-off of stormwater and siltation.
Building Mallory Court to NCDOT standards would dictate the grading
and clearing of a significantly wider swath through the woods than
proposed for a private road. The stream would be less affected by
3
12
private road construction.
6. The site is already developed to 100% of the capacity which could
be achieved after approval of the subdivision and some or all of the
non-conforming aspects of existing development on the site will be
made more conforming as a result of the proposed subdivision, and
all conforming aspects of the development will remain conforming.
Not applicable.
7. There is only one subdivision road proposed. Its length does not
exceed 350 feet. It serves no more than five lots. Its grade does
not exceed nine percent. The land being subdivided is not
connected to or is part of another subdivision required to be served
by public roads. In addition, the average lot size within the
subdivision is at least 40,000 square feet.
Not applicable.
EVALUATION SUMMARY: The subdivision is located in the Lower Eno Protected
Watershed. The stream on the property flows south into the Eno River. The Concept
Plan shows lots twice the minimum size along the stream, where buffers of 100' will be
required. These will need to be redrawn to allow for adequate space for homes and
septic fields. Mallory Court as a private road would require a limited impervious
surface--an 18-foot travelway. Based on these factors, Staff recommends that Mallory
Court be approved as a Class A private road.
4
13
FISCAL DVACT ANALYSIS FOR CHASE HOLLOW SUBDIVISION
-RESIDENTIAL SERVICE STANDARD APPROACH
Prepared by
The Orange County Planning Department
May, 1995
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Chase Hollow Subdivision is a proposed 14-lot major subdivision located in Eno Township on the
east side of New Sharon Church Road.The total area of the subdivision is approximately 30 acres,and the
current zoning is AR-Agricultural Residential and Lower Eno Protected Watershed.The average lot size
is approximately 2.1 acres.All lots will be served by individual wells and septic tanks, and private roads.
For Chase Hollow,project build-out is estimated at four years.Housing units will be constructed,
beginning in 1998, with completion of the project scheduled for 1999. Units will consist of detached
single-family homes,and the applicant estimates the average sales price to be$135,000,including the lot.
METHODOLOGY
Fiscal impact analysis is a projection of the direct,current, public costs and revenues associated
with residential and non residential growth in the jurisdiction in which the growth is taking place. Fiscal
impact analysis considers only direct impact in that it projects only the primary coats that will be incurred
and the immediate revenues that will be generated. It calculates the financial effect of a planned
development or new subdivision by considering the current costa and revenues such a development would
generate if it were completed and occupied today.Fiscal impact analysis does not consider the private coats
of public action. It is concerned only with public (governmental) costa and revenues.
The method used in preparing the fiscal impact analysis is the Service Standard Approach. While
only gibes ezpeaditures by service category are derived from the Per Capita Method,the Service Standard
method determines time total number of additional employees by service function that will be required as
a result of growth. This method employe average county government costa per person, average school
costa per pupil, an emplo'y'ee to pop mom,and average operating expenses per employee for each
service category and school district. The number of new employees are projected and multiplied times the
average operating expenses Cmcludes personnel,operating and capital costa)per employee. These average
costs are then weighed against per capita and per pupil revenues to project the total net fiscal impact of
the development.
14
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SERVICE STANDARD APPROACH
PROJECT FISCAL IMPACT ANALYSIS
Section 1 - Project Data
Project Name, Township, School District
Beginning Year, Ending Year, Inflation
Characteristics of Households
Construction Schedule/Cost Data
Section 2 - Local Government and School District Data
Budget Year
Per Capita Revenues
Per Capita Expenditures
Per Student Expenditures
School District Per Employee Expenditures
Employees Per 1000 Population
County Per Employee Expenditure
Other Data
Other Model Constants
School District Data
Section 3 -Demographic Projections Based On Project Data
Total Housing
Total Population
School Children
Additional County Employees
Total
School District Additional Employees
Section 4-Projected Net Fiscal Impact on County
Tax Base
Revenues
Expenditures
Net Fiscal Impact
Section b -Projected Net Fiscal Impact on School District
Revenues
Ezpeaditures
Net Fiscal Impact
Section 6 -Summary at Projected Impacts
Additional Housing
Additional Population
Additional School Children
Tax Base
County Government Balance
School District Balance
Total Net F5scal Impact
EXPLANATION OF TERMS AND DATA SOURCES
15
RESIDENTIALFISCAL IMPACT TEMPLATE: SERVICE STANDARD METHOD
Bureau of Economic dt Business Research— University of Florida
Modified 3/15195 — Orange County,NC Planning Department
SECTION 1 — PROJECT DATA: ENTER THE FOLLOWING DATA FOR EACH PROJECT:
PROJECT: Cie HoWw Subdivision
TOWNSHIP: Eno
CONSTRUCTION PERIOD:
Beginuiag Year:. 1996
Ending Year: 1999
Inflstiaa Rate: .
2.90°6
CHARACTERISTICS OF HOUSEHOLDS:
2.57
Chddren/House: 0.44
:. .... ............
Elder ..<::::.::::;
100
HOME SALES DATA:
Average Distribution
Number of Sales Price of Units
Year Homes bj Year
> ........:<...:......:::><:.:: »<:;::>:>:;:>;::4:;:::: „;::.
:.....:::..::.::...:.::...::.;::::>;.;>;;:..:::.;:;:.;:.;:.:::.;::.;:.:::.;;::.:::. ... .: .:::. .:.. . 13500�..::.:..:,.:>:.:::.::.;:...::::::.;::.:;:::..:.:.:;::.;..;...::::.ZS.S79b
1997 4 135000 28.57%
:::..........::....:.::...:::..................................... ...... .. ............ .. ..... ..:.::::::.:.::...::.::..::::.::....::....::.....:............ .. .
1999 3 135000 21.43%
...
....
:..::...:::...:........ :...
............
.. .. ...........:...:.::::.::::. .:.:::::::,.::.,:::::..:::::..:::..:.......................................... .... ..................:.:.:::::..:.::....:::....:.:....:.....:.....:::......:.....:... .
2001 0 0 0.00%
«.<:::<:.:;;::>:::: :»:;:;::;::>::;:::>:::.::<::<>.... :::.:.::.::.:::. .>::;:..._:,:.;.•::;::....:::. .:....,<.. . :..<.:::::..:::.;:. .;::..: :.;::.::..;.:::>;:;;,.:. :>:. :0.0096
:..::..:.::::::.:::::.:.:..:..::.::::::::.:::.:::::..:,:::::::.::..:.::...::.:..:::.:......::. .::...:...........:..:...::::.:.::::: .::..:..:::::.:::...:. :.::..:...:..::::.::::..::::::..:...
20M 0 0 0.00%
0
0
r4 .00 J
l V�74�i: `t:iiS z��i'`.:><'E�:"�`!``�i>:?�<i:;`.:?' ?� `ii:(�^:�>[:i�i:?C:':
2005 0 0 0.0096
SCHOOL DISTRICT DATA: ENTER'r IN( )BESIDE SCHOOL DISTRICT IN WHICH PROJECT IS TO BE
LOCATED TO GENERATE STUDENT DISTRIBUTION BY SCHOOL TYPE.
School District: School Attendance:
co ::>,. ...:.. . .... .........::::.�::::.:;::;:::::.:::L. .;:<.::..;.:: ' ..Elemea School'; :; :>::':::<:.�»::.;_, . .: ;;::.::..
Middle School 23%
IHifl-Guru:::»>.;::: :::>;::.> 0 :. . Hi Schoot.:::: > ::. ..: .::::.: ::: 27%
SCHOOL AGE CHILDREN/HOUSEHOLD: ENTER NUMBER OF UNITS BY HOUSING TYPE TO
GENERATE NUMBER OF SCHOOL AGE CHILDREN.
Children School Age
HousW Type Units Per Horse Children
: .
.........:::....
DupkyTrlple=/Quadpkz... .. .,. . :0 0 0
,.
Town House 0 0 0
Totals 14 0:44 6
16
SECTION 3 — DEMOGRAPHIC PROJiCTIONS BASED ON PROJECT DATA
YEAR 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000
HOUSING UNITS 4 8 11 14 14
POPULATION 10 21 28 36 36
SCHOOL CHILDREN
Elementary 1 2 2 3 3
Middle
High School 2 2
TOTAL 2.. 4
5. 6 6
COUNTY GOVERNMENT
ADDITIONAL EMPLOYEES
General Government t}:( ?: 0.0 f}.fl:': 0.0 0.0
Public Safe
:. ... .. :::
Public Works
0.0 O.O.; 0.0 ; ..... 0.0
Human Services 0.0 0.1 E11::: 0.1
0.1
TOTAL 0.1 '02
SCHOOL DISTRICT t)
0.
ADDITIONAL EMPLOYEES
YEAR 2004 :<'- 2005
HOUSING
UNITS
POPULATION »:;;><:>..<::<.;::: ....
»:<:;<',3b`: 36 .:.: :::> :: 36
SCHOOL L
CHILDREN
Elementary tart
Middle
High School ::>:::::::;::>;;;»::>:::::;>::::::; :> :
TOTAL
. ... ......
.:.......:.
COUNTY GO
ADD
TTIO
N
AL
81[Pi.O
PEES
Ge
IICIa
1
Gove
lIImCDi
Public Safe
"E >`
Public Works
Human Services E1I' 0.1 ; ` '`:: 14 0.1 a.1
TOTAL `<...E3.2. 0.2 0.2 0.2
SCHOOL DISTRICT :'.: : EIL3. 03 - Q3> 03 0.3
ADDITIONAL EMPLOYEES
1
17
SECTION 5 — PROJECTED FISCAL IMPACT OF PROJECT ON SCHOOL DISTRICT
YEAR L996 1997 1998 1999 2000
REVENUES (s)
County 2629 5410 7654 10024 10315
School District 0 0 0 0 0
State 5984 12314 17423 22818 23480
TOTAL ($) 8612 17724 25078 32843 33795
EXPENDITURES (s)
County .2629 5410 7654 10024 10315
School District 0. 0 0;, 0 0
State 5984 12314 17423.' 22818 23480
TOTAL 17724 25078 32843 :. 33795
NET FISCAL IMPACT 0 ( ` 0 0
YEAR %`::::7.tlQ1::: 2002 20t 2004 ::.2005
REVENUE
S($)(
s
)
County ; <I0614s; 10922 : :;I3235
11565
School District
0 : >>s
0 :.'
0
4862 2
7088
State 2 ;<::; .;25 .. _:.
263
TOTAL (1� :3��5 35784 >:?' : .:.: '>;368�1:€
37889. <:>: : ...
38988
ENDITURES
EXP s
i9ao
County 10922 ;:>` ;. 11
115
1
:...:.:,....,.::..,..:............. p 0
0
School District Q:: ;: ::' ;
263 862
7088
State <�<<��> _<:�` ?yti6r�`> 24W ?SS83
2
988
38
TOTAL 35
784 36821;::
3 788
NET FISCAL IMPACT >:>::`<:<>»::>>;<>:<:::;�:: p <:>EI`: 0 0
18
SECTION 7 — SUMMARY OF PROJECTED PUBLIC SCHOOL CAPACITY IMPACTS
SCHOOL DISTRICT DATA: ENTER"VIN( )BESIDE SCHOOL DISTRICT IN WHICH PROJECT IS TO BE
LOCATED TO GENERATE STUDENT DISTRIBUTION BY SCHOOL TYPE.
School District: School Attendance:
Orange County. ( 1 ) Elementary School 50%
Middle School 23%
1HM—Cantoro 0 Hi School 27%
YEAR 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000
SCHOOL CHILDREN
Elementary 1 2 2. 3 3
Middle
High School 1. 2 : 2
TOTAL 2 4 5 6 6
YEAR 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005
SCHOOL CHK DREN
Elementary :;»;;.,.:;:>;,:
sa
Mid 1 :.i: i >' :'<'<:.:
High School "'2`s 2 .: Z' 2 .<:; '`:::°>:`: ` . 2
TOTAL :.<`b< 6 6 6 `°';"` ><: b
SCHOOL CAPACUMS—ALL SCHOOLS CURRENT ENROLLMENT—ALL SCHOOLS
> ::.<:»::.::>:::::: .::. 2838.:.
2
Ekmea ..... .
Middle 1232 Middle 1290
...... ......:....,. 1518 HI Sc:hovl:. :; .; >:'":; :::,'»:°: .;..:. . .. 1505
TOTAL 5588 TOTAL 5562
YEAR 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000
PROJE
CTED HNROILlAMT
770
..:.....:::.:.::::...::
0
2
Elementary < '<< <<>;< � >�'2?fill 2769 ..: :: ..:::: �__`::;27b'� 277
Middle 129E�` 1291 ;::>._::: :> ::<2291<' 129 ;;:.;.::..
L291
High
School 15
1506
:15�J6;
1507
07
5568
5
5
68
TOTAL > `�`>:'SS64�` 5566 '. SS6T�`
. >:>::::;
YEAR 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005
PROJECTED ENjtOLL1BNT
770
Elementary <:2??tf> 2770 . >:<>-2?7tf. 2770 :;>:;`;::::.:..
2
.........:......
Middle >:129>:: 1291 ;>:: 1: 1291 _ '. :.... 1291
High School <>>LM7.. 1507 1507 1507 .:.'<'> %:: .. 1507
5568
TOTAL ::`.SS6�': 5568 5561 ` 5568
19
EXPLANATION OF TERMS AND DATA SOURCES
SECTION 1 -PROJECT DATA
Project data includes information about the specific development project. Much, if not all, of the
information is supplied by the applicant. Data inputs include:
Project Name: Name of the project.
Township: Township in which the project is located.
School District: School district in which the project is located.
Beginning Year: The first year of the project in which dwelling units are completed and
�P�
Ending Year: The last year in which dwelling units are completed and occupied The template is set to
calculate fiscal impacts for a ten-year period.
inflation Rate: Unless an inflation rate is entered, the template will calculate fiscal impacts based on
constant dollars.Since the inflation rate changes frequently, the Finance Department must be contacted
for the most recent figure.
Persons/Household:The estimated average number of persons/household(dwelling unit) based on 1990
Census data for the township in which the project is lasted.This information is supplied by the Planning
Department and will,be updated as necessary using population projections and building permit data.
Children/Household: The estimated average number of school age clvldren/household (dwelling unit)
based on 1990 Census data for the township in which the project is located.This information is supplied
by the Planning Department and wf be updated as necessary using school membership data.
%Non-Elderly:N.C.General Statutes permit an$11,000 exemption to the elderly and disabled who meet
certain income criteria. In the event that elderly units are part of the project, the percentage of eligible
non-elderly units is entered The tax base wM automatically be axjusted to reflect the exemption.
Number of Homes: The number of dwelling units to be constructed in the project in each year.
Average Sales Price:The average sales price of all dwelling units based on the number and sales price
of dwelling unit types to be conWzueted in each year.
20
SECTION 2 - LOCAL GOVERNMENT AND SCHOOL DISTRICT DATA
Local government data includes information regarding expenditures required to provide County
services and revenues received based on the approved Orange County budget for the fiscal year in which
the project is considered for approval.All information derived from the approved budget remains constant
throughout a fiscal year (July-June) and is changed only with the approval of a new budget.
Local government revenue and expenditure information is compiled on a per capita (per person)
basis.Per capita figures are derived by dividing the total expenditures for a particular service function or
revenue source by the estimated population of Orange County for the year in which the project is
considered for approval. Populations estimates are prepared by the Planning Department.
Data inputs include the following:
Budget Year: The current fiscal year, i.e., 1994-95.
Per Capita Revenues: The sources of revenue by major category are as follows:
Taxes-Other Than Property:Revenues from taxes other than property taxes include those from sales
and use taxes, franchise taxes, and animal taxes.
Intergovernmental Aid: Revenues from this source, in the form of categorical aid or shared-tax
revenues, are provided through State and federal assistance programs.
Service Charges: Service (or user)charges support numerous functions and are charged to those who
voluntarily receive goveraanental services or use governmental facilities.
Miscellaneous:Miscellaneous revenues include interest earnings on investments,proceeds fi-om license
and permit fees, and all other revenues.
Per Capita Expenditures by major category are as follows:
General Government: Services related to the legislative, administrative, Smancial, and legal functions
of government.
Public Safety: Law enforcement services and emergency medical services.
Public Works: Efforts related to the maintenance of County-owned property and the provision of
sanitation (solid waste disposal) services.
Human Services: Departments responsible for the provision of health, social, and recreation-related
services.
Education:Orange County supports two school units,the Orange County school system and the Chapel
MU\Carrboro school system. This category includes appropriations made to the designated school system
for Recurring Capital items. Rearing Capital fiords are used for general maintenance,pufchase of new
equipment/furnishings and vehicle maintenance.
Non-Departmental• Contributions to agencies providing cultural and social services outside the formal
structure of county government. Other expenditures include equipment replacement and contingency
funda. Although there are no employees generated by this category,it has been included as an operating
expenditure. It will be included in Section 4,'Total Annual County Expenditure." These expenditures will
be calculated on a per capita basis as opposed to a per employee basis.
21
SECTION 3 •DEMOGRAPHIC PROJECTIONS BASED ON PROJECT DATA
Demographic projections provide information about the number of new residents and school children
anticipated in Orange County resulting from project development.Projections also provide the number of
additional employees required per service function and school district as a result of the new development.
Total Housing Units: The cumulative total of new housing units added each year by project
development.
Total Population:The total population added each year by a project derived by multiplying the number
of homes to be constructed by the number of persons per household (see Section 1).
School Population: The total number of school children added each year by a project derived by
multiplying the number of homes constructed by the number of children per household (see Section 1).
Additional County Employees: The number of additional employees required per service category
based on project development.
Total:Total of all additional county employees required based on project development.
School District Additional Employees: The number of additional employees required per school
district based on the project development.
SECTION 4•PROJECTED NET FISCAL IMPACT ON COUNTY
Tax Base:The tax base represents the increase in assessed property value expected each year resulting
from project development.The values shown are in$1,000's and are derived from a formula which includes
the number and sales price of homes, and the assessment ratio. Where applicable, the percentage of
non-elderly units and elderly exemption are also used
Revenues:All revenues are derived from a formula which multiplies the per capita revenues(Section 2)
times the projected population (Section 3).The exception to this is the property tax which multiplies the
tax base times the county government tax rate.
Expenditures: All expenditures are derived from a formula which multiplies the per employee
expenditure (Section 2) times the number of additional employees (Section 3).
Net Fiscal Impact: The net balance is the difference between projected expenditures and
projected revenues. A negative net balance indicates that it costs Orange County more to provide services
to a project than it receives m revenues.A positive net balance indicates that more revenues are received
than it costa to serve a project.Positive net balances in one project may thus be used to offset negative
balances in another.
22
NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES- FY 1994-95 ORANGE COUNTY BUDGET
1994 ORANGE COUNTY POPULATION 102894
PERMANENT FTE % OF % OF POSITIONS
FUNCTION POSITIONS SUBTOTAL TOTAL PER CAPITA
GENERAL GOVERNMENT
Commisebnem 3.225 293% 0.15% 0.00003
Court WA 0.00% 0.00% 0.00000
Beetlara. 3.500. 3.18% : 0.17% 0.00003
Manager 8.000 7.27% 0.38% 0.00008
7:000
0.00007
Budget 3.000 273% 0.14% 0.00003
,
5.000 4.54%:: 024%: :. 0.00005
Purchasing 3.000 273% 0.14% 0.00003
0.00005
Central 3eiviees
3.000 273% 0.14% 0.00003
14.7W :
...M40%. 0.70%•
0.
TaxAsaesaor 18.000 16.35% 0.88% 0.00017
7:000 .
Tax CoUctor 6.000 5.45% 026% 0.00006
Plimulfiri
;.... :.
�..::.:.. .:.. .....,:.. . .. .. 23.1000
SUBTOTAL 110.075 100.0096 5.22% 0.00107
PUBLIC SAFETY
428 x -:.;..::..:..: ..:0 00068
Daneelfc Vblsnce 1.000 0.72% 0.05% 0.00001
:.. ,.:........ ...:: ........ ... :.:.. ,...4T.300:`: ':<>::;;;.:::::':.:'34.25%::;>:>?::;. ::.::>•>.::.22'.4'Xe:>>;<.'' :":': '< '0.000.08
SUBTOTAL 13&750 100.00% 65896 0.00135
PUBLIC WORKS
............. ............ . . .... . ..x6.008 ::: ::.::;:;;...,..
Other
WA 0.00% 0.00% 0.00000
:<>::.
..:..:... ...
.::.. :.::.:...::::;;.:.... :.;.<::::::::..:s.;;::�;:•.;:.;•;;;;;;:.;>;..::;;:::>:.;::;:.;::::;:::>:.:.:..;:..5.000: :;::;:;::�:::;t0.fl0% .0.00006
8an14Won 17.000 34.001A 0.811A 0.00017
SUBTOTAL 50.000 100.0096 237% 0.00049
HUMAN SERVICES
0.00004
.::<.::1.38!1� ;�:°;>�;:"�:::.0:1>i9G:.::.'.>:><:;.:.;
Econank;Development 3.000 1.18% 0.14% 0.00003
socimi. :....::... .::. ..:.:.:.::..:.:::............:........... .::.::::::::•:: .:::.:::.....;t00.t00'. : .43:06%::::;:.......... »;;" �8'lfi: r>:•; ".::0:00106
Health 72.075 28.46% 3.42% 0.00070
. .. :.::..::.:. .;::"::;.;:.;:;:. *730: 9.86'Xr:.; 0�i6lir:....:. ..::::;::. M00009
Flecnration& Parks 11.750 4.64% 0.56% 0.00011
:'.'.'` '. ?: :.:::.:E i.[.>. ": :.: :•:?: .-.. 0.00010
.:::.::::::.::,...:....:.. iQ600. 418'X...::..::.. .:.
CAT 11.250 4.44% 0.53% 0.00011
..•CoaMsion lbt Waraet ";.: 2.730..
...0:00003
LbmlY 9.100 3.50% 0.43% 0.00008
CMd suPPod..::'. 10.000 3.96% .: 0.47%: 0.00010
SUBTOTAL 253.375 100.00% 12.02% 0.00246 '
23
GENERAL FUND REVENUES - FY 1994-95 ORANGE COUNTY BUDGET
1994 ORANGE COUNTY POPULATION 102894
% OF % OF PER CAPITA
TYPE AMOUNT SUBTOTAL TOTAL REVENUE
PROPERTY TAXES
$40.737.790 98.43'X►
a9.42%. $386.11
DAngwnt Taos $500,000 121% 0.85% $4.88
tntenstoaDaNnqu��tTazaa ;,.:::.;.>::: $150AW 0.3M 0.26%.: $1.46
Lett Ll �............ .. $0 0.00% 0.00% $0.00
::::... .. ::...;. .:..
V"kk LittPtatNits:: $000
SUBTOTAL. $41,407,790 100.00% 7052% $402.43
OTHER LOCAL TAXES
.>:Saw and Uso:TiDC'::: . 173 750 96a : 1%
::...:.::.........i.... . Z°x►:; :..:;:.s:;i:,:::T� .$40.58
PdAoge L berme Tax WA 0.006A 0.000A $0.00
.......:..:.:.>;:::..:
...::..;:.::,.;:::.:.;>:;<; $110,247.. . 2.51.94.: .Etglfi :::' :>.>:>:>:::i;.>::.:iczc,$1.07
Anima$Tax $104,000 2.37% 0.18% $1.01
SUBTOTAL $4 87,97 100.00% 7.47% $42.65
INTERGOVERNMENTAL
i. 32
9G. ....:'.i:':;'.;:...... 4 :« :» ;: $2:i
8«r&Wino Tax $188.727 1.88% 0.29%
86
S"W SorAcot $4.454.075 4920% 7.50% $43.29
T. :><::.> >:_;?::::::r::::::> >::::a::::;,:> .:>::::::.;:<>: ;,:>::E:;:c::i:ii> ;:.:;:>::> 3.'.fAlfe....... ..... 056% $3.
Other State $838,818 928% 1.43% $8.15
; ..:............: .:..... 14000 322!4..... . .. ......0.44.+10...:......:... ..:::.: 14.80
SUBTOTAL $9,053,572 1004" 15.4296 $87.99
SERVICE CHARGES
: .
........... ::s:::::.:.,..:«;::;<::. >:>::. 739 .... 2?88gr;:::.•:.: 1.52%
Land Rocorda $28,800 0.97% 0.05% $0.26
:::::::::::.:::::.:::::: ::::..:•::::...:::::.::..:.:::::..:::::.:..
Piarrning ................. .....:... . .........:.:.....:;
Shor3► $834,063 30.06% 1.42% $8.11
ERAS ;;: .::::»::;;;>:.:;::;:,;:>.r :;;<. ;;;: , <:: .>..;. $101,OOa r::.::•3.8470:.;::;:;
APS Fo« $4,000 0.14% 0.01% $0.04
hloalth:::`: :_..::::<:::. :_ ,.< _.::...::::;:..: :, ...: :::::.:::::<.;:::..::::.. ::� : : •;_ 0.6591±>��:::: . :>::..:; :'. i4.74
socW sorvicoo $36,000, 1.37% 0.08% $0.37
T'}<'s _>< :_;: ; ;«>:<. 6.4495:;:.:':r` $1.75
Rtoraalbn 4 Pads $78,980 2.84% 0.13% $0•77
irr,417 2.T _<:: :' az3% ° ;:.: ::
Mbc4knoouo Chryot $73,800 286% 0.13% $0.72
SUBTOTAL 52,775,491 100.00% 4.73% 526.97
24
GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURES-- FY 1994-95 ORANGE COUNTY BUDGET
19%ORANGE COUNTY POPULATION 102894
% OF % OF PER CAPITA
TYPE AMOUNT SUBTOTAL TOTAL EXPENSE
GENERAL GOVERNMENT
$316,5oe 444%
$3.06
Couns $15,000 0.23% 0.03% $0.15
Deotlooe $217,568 3.33% . 0.35%:
M g
a n er. .•... . $544,747 8.34% - 0.96% $5.29
... :: ':>:: ; : ..:. $402,004 Q7296
Budget $157,661 2.41% 028% $1.53
;:....;. . .. $254x341..... :. .. .._.3.89yG:?:'.. C46%:::::.`_ ':: $247
Purchmeing $188,711 2.58% 0.30% $1.62
$494........ ................:.:::...:.:: :...::. .....:.. ....:. 737%, ::::':r : G.BD%.:: `:::::.: .::>:.` . :: $4.81
Gntrw SeMas $654,644 10.02% 1.18% $8.38
Tax Asaeesor
$781,791 11.88% 1.3796 $7.40
..Eaadcocda
::....
Tax Colector
$318.585 4.88% 0.57% $3.10
:112.07.
SUBTOTAL $6,532,710 100.00% 11.74% $63.49
PUBLIC SAFETY
.. ....:.:..::...:. ;;>:.;..:.;:::.$!ta14,24t . ........:. se.359$;;.>::::>::::; ::_.<,;;..: .. >>: >;;<::::.::>
Domeetic Vblsnee $39,354 0.62% 0.07% $0.38
Emerg�re8eMees
SUBTOTAL $6,350,477 100im 11.42% $61.72
PUBLIC WORKS
............. . Sl, ::.:::.. sx.4f%..:..:. ... sts.2�
:..::.. ....:....:..::... .........
.:. :.
OtlrK $197,435 9.11% 0.30% $1.83
:...:...: .. :...as4x::.. .::.::.:..:.:.:..
$0
:.:................
.............. .... ...
SardWon $006,986 33.101A 1.93% $8.81
SUBTOTAL $2,73944 100.00% 4.93% $26.63
HUMAN SERVICES
SasE.d4 VY
:;•:.;:...:;:::.;:.:::<: :::s ::»::_:> :..::;;:;
Economic oevebpnent $190,177 1.14% 0.34% $1.85
. ... ..:::.::..::..........:.... .. ....::.. ::.;;�;.::.::::$$;734.254:.:;::;
$3,800,873 22239A e.e4% $35.50
::Agrbv �m■ro :>: >:><< ><::..''", :. :: _.;. :.:': <?' tz ,�s.;: s2.7a
R.ocmtbn 6 Parka $594,999 3.4096 1.0296 $5.49
......°>: -'. ;;: :: >::>:;::>:.:">; ":.:::.. .0638,78? _ ::: Q .. " $8.24
CAT $423,034 236% 0.79% $4.11
c4mm wion.iwwQmut - .. .
$121.070 O.Td' : ' 022% $1.18
Ub
rarY $441,711 268% 0.79% $4.29
CtAd Suppod.
$481.420 278%' 0.8396 $4.48
SUBTOTAL $16,618,148 100.00% 29.87% $16151
1
25
HOUSEHOLD OCCUPANCY CHARACTERISTICS FOR ORANGE COUNTY,NC
BY TOWNSHIP
(3) (4) (5)
Children. Children School Age School Age
Number Persons Persons Under 18 Under 18 Children Children
;, ;..::>::In. Per:. . . Ig Per. In Per
T HoasehoHs:::Haoaeh Ws Household Households Household Households Household
1990 CENSUS
1122 OS2., 721 033
Cedar Grove 1345 3676 2.73 865 0.64 624 0.46
531082.22. 9939. 0:42::. :: . 6 ':. 0.29
Cheeks 2036 5422 2.66 1340 0.66 999 0.49
:::..;::..::::: >;;;.:.;:.;;::«:::;::
:>:; >::::;;;_:<: ::. :
Hl7lsborough : 3811 9816 2.58 2567 0.67 1777 0.47
2183.:: . —.21 580 VS 052
Orange County 36104 84627 234 17698 0.49 12399 0.34
1980 CENSUS
N A::.>::. .:. OS6
. .:.....:.:.:.:.... ..:::.:::..::..:..:.....
Cedar Grove 1176 3166 2.69 919 0.78 N/A 0.66
:;:::;; 8374.. ::. :>::<>::.:0:45 :.;;::..;.:::ILIA:,::...: :, 0
Cheeks 1693 4821 2.85 1466 0.87 N/A 0.70
0.62
Hillsborough 3233 8599 2.66 2421 0.75 N/A 0.65
Little i�iaer`:<:::<<<:; 2.5'3 :: . : 443 O ZT 1!€fA:.::.:. ,... ... 64
Oran a County 287107 770SS 2.68 15879 0.55 N/A N/A
NOTES: (1)Nunber of howehaWs ae9aded made 1980 Census data is amber of bousag aaita.
(Z)Persons is houatlwids iaaiuded 1980 Craws data includes popultioa a basebotds as welt as group gasrten.
(3)Nustber of ebildn a taller IS Tess of age inctades ehadz ea 6lriag to group quarters due to bwk of breakdown
by hotsebold in avdlabie Caawa data.
(4)Data aot amaitabta AV=1980 Ceaaa.
(5)190 data calculated udag demaographie Multipliers frog'Ybe New Pruatioaces Guide to Fiscal Impact
AsatysW by BtrebelL Ustoka,sad Dolpha.
ORANGE COUNTY PLANNING BOARD MINUTES 5-15-95 D 26
VOTE: Unanimous.
(3) Chase Hollow
( 14 Lots - Eno Township)
Presentation by Jim Hinkley.
The property is located on the east side of New
Sharon Church Road south of Walker Road south of
Walker Road, in Eno Township. It is zoned AR
Agricultural-Residential and is in the L-ENO-PW
protected watershed overlay district. It is
designated Agricultural-Residential in the Land
Use Element of the Comprehensive Plan.
Fourteen lots are proposed, ranging in size from
1.95 to 2.60 acres. All lots will be served by
individual wells and septic tanks. Access is
provided by a Class A private road. The private
road justification is an attachment to these
minutes on pages
An intermittent creek requiring a 90-foot stream
buffer, skirts the west side of the subdivision.
It runs generally parallel with New Sharon Church
Road.
The Planning Board reviewed the Concept Plan
(named Chase Acres) on February 20, 1995. The
Plan was approved with a Class A Private Road
with two conditions:
1. Access to all lots be limited to Mallory
Court; and
2. Payment in lieu of donating land for park and
recreation purposes will be made by the
developer.
As discussed at the February 20, 1995 Planning
Board meeting, the boundary of the subdivision
has been modified by mutual agreement with New
Sharon Church and other neighbors to eliminate an
unusable strip of land and provide additional
acreage so as to broaden the contiguous portion
with New Sharon Church Road and improve access.
The Planning Staff recommends approval of the
Preliminary Plan for Chase Hollow subject to the
conditions contained in the Resolution of
Approval (which is an attachment to these minutes
on pages ) .
Jobsis commended the developer on the creative
work done in negotiating with adjacent property
ORANGE COUNTY PLANNING BOARD MINUTE 5-15-95 D 27
i S
owners to improve access. Waddell agreed.
MOTION: Jobsis moved approval as recommended by Planning
Staff. Seconded by Reid.
Price asked about a pond in the area. Hinkley
responded that there is a wet weather stream.
VOTE: Unanimous.
AGENDA ITEM #9: MATTERS SCHEDULED FOR PUBLIC HEARING (5/31/95)
Mary Willis reviewed the following items scheduled
for public hearing on May 31, 1995:
1. Z-4-95 Donald Keith Godwin
The first item which will be considered is a
proposed rezoning within the Carrboro Joint
Development Area of the Joint Planning Area Land Use
Plan. This rezoning requires approval of both Orange
County Board of Commissioners and the Carrboro
Board of Aldermen. The Carrboro Board of Aldermen
will be present for this item at the public hearing.
The property is located within Transition I Area of
the Joint Planning Area Land Use Plan. The
applicant proposes to rezone approximately 13.5
acres from Carrboro R-R, Rural Residential, which
allows a maximum density of one dwelling unit per
acre, to Carrboro R-20, which allows a maximum
density of 2. 1 dwelling units per acre.
2. Z-1-95 James Travis Rives
The applicant proposes to rezone approximately 2.75
acres of an 18.7 acre parcel in the vicinity of
White Cross from Agricultural Residential (AR) to
Agricultural Services (AS) .
The proposed zoning lots front on White Cross Road,
and measure 200 , wide by 600' deep. It is located in
the central portion of an 18.7 acre lot which is
currently zoned Agricultural Residential. The
portion of the property proposed to be rezoned is
currently used for raising plants for a landscape
business, and is considered a bona fide farm use
which is exempt from zoning regulations. The
rezoning is being requested to allow the applicant
to also sell mulch, topsoil and other products and
shrubs which are not produced on the property.
3. Z-2-95 Robert D. McBroom