Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda - 04-03-1995 - VIII-E 1 ORANGE COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS ACTION AGENDA ITEM ABSTRACT Meeting Date: ARril 3 1995 Action Agenda Item gr- SUBJECT: Flying W. Estates - Preliminary Plan ACTION BY: May 18, 1995 DEPARTMENT: PLANNING PUBLIC HEARING Yea X No ATTACHMENT(S) : INFORMATION CONTACT: Eddie Kirk Ext. 2582 Resolution of Approval Application Vicinity Map TELEPHONE NUMBERS: Preliminary Plan Hillsborough - 732-8181 Fiscal Impact Analysis Durham - 688-7331 Draft 3/20/95 Planning Board Minutes Mebane - 227-2031 Chapel Hill - 967-9251 PURPOSE: To consider the Preliminary Plan for Flying W. Estates. BACKGROUND: The property is located on the southwest side of Schley Road (SR 1548) , and is known as lots 17 and 17A of Tax Map 9, Eno Township. It is zoned A-R and L-ENO-PW and designated Agricultural Residential and Lower Eno Watershed in the Land Use Element of the Comprehensive Plan. The area proposed for development is 77.57 acres. There are 12 lots proposed with approximately 52 acres remaining in the parcel. Each lot will be served by individual wells and septic tanks. The lots range in size from 1.47 acres to 3.23 acres with an average size of 1.85 acres. Access into the subdivision is provided from Schley Road. A public road is proposed to serve the subdivision with a 60 foot right-of-way to be retained to provide access to the remaining 52.29 acre parcel. A 1993 traffic count on Schley Road just east of NC 57 indicated 600 trips per day. M 2 M The Planning Board approved the Concept Plan for Flying W. Estates on December 19, 1994 with two conditions: 1. Lot 1 shall receive access from the subdivision road. 2. The remaining 52.29 acre parcel must meet the minimum road frontage requirements. A condition in the Resolution of Approval will require lot 1 to receive access from the subdivision road and the remaining 52.29 acre tract will meet the minimum frontage requirements on Henry Lane. On March 20, 1995 the Planning Board unanimously recommended approval of the Preliminary Plan for Flying W. Estates subject to the conditions contained in the Resolution of Approval. RECOMMENDATION: The Administration recommends approval of the Preliminary Plan for Flying W. Estates subject to the conditions contained in the attached Resolution of Approval. 3 RESOLUTION OF THE ORANGE COUNTY BOARD OF COUN'T'Y COM IISSIONERS Date April 3. 1995 Name of Subdivision Flying W. Estates Owner/Applicant L. M. Walker The Board of County Commissioners hereby approves Flying W. Estates Subdivision Preliminary Plat, dated December 27, 1994 and containing 12 lots in Orange County, subject to the fulfillment of requirements specified herein. Ivaada Drive shall be irrevocably dedicated to the general public and be constructed to standards of the North Carolina Department of Transportation. The approval of this resolution authorizes and directs the Orange County Manager to accept for Orange County and on behalf of the public generally, the offer of dedication of Ivaada Drive. This acceptance by Orange County of the dedication to the general public of Ivaada Drive shall be without maintenance responsibility. This road shall be maintained by the owner/applicant until such time as it is accepted for maintenance by the North Carolina Department of Transportation or some other governmental body. Before the Final Plat of Flying W. Estates can be recorded: A. Sewage Disposal 1. Each residential lot shall contain an adequate area for septic disposal, and repair area, approved by the Orange County Division of Environmental Health. 2. The septic system location may restrict the size and location of improvements. This disclosure shall be included in a document describing development restrictions to be recorded concurrently with the Final Plat. The document shall also disclose that information regarding the tentative location of septic systems is available from the Orange County Health Department, Division of Environmental Health. B. Roads and Access 1. Ivaada Drive shall be constructed to standards of the North Carolina Department of Transportation, within a 60-foot right-of-way, and the construction shall be inspected and approved by NCDOT. OR 4 A letter of credit, escrow agreement, or bond shall be submitted to secure construction of Ivaada Drive to the standards of the North Carolina Department of Transportation. An estimate of the construction cost must be prepared by a certified/licensed engineer or grading contractor and submitted to the Planning and Inspections Department. The financial guarantee must reflect 110% of that estimate and be issued by an accredited financial institution licensed to do business in North Carolina. The document describing development restrictions to be recorded with the Final Plat shall state that the financial guarantee will not be released until the road construction has been inspected and approved by NCDOT. 2. Submit an erosion control plan for construction of the road. 3. A sight triangle to NCDOT standards shall be shown at the intersection of Schley Road and Ivaada Drive, and Henry Lane and Ivaada Drive. 4. A Private Road Maintenance Agreement for Henry Lane shall be submitted to the Planning and Inspections Department and approved by the County Attorney. 5. An approved street name sign shall be erected at the intersection of streets as required in Section IV-B-3-c-12 of the Orange County Subdivision Regulations. Evidence shall be submitted by the applicant that signs are in place or a copy of the receipt for purchase of the signs shall be submitted to the Planning Department. 6. Lot 1 shall receive access from Ivaada Drive. C. Land Use Buffers and Landscaping 1. Landscaping shall be installed or preserved as indicated on the approved landscape plan, and must be inspected and approved by the Planning and Inspections Department. OR Guaranteed financially through a letter of credit, escrow agreement, or bond submitted to secure required landscape installation and preservation. An estimate of the cost for required preservation, plantings and their installation must be provided. The financial guarantee shall reflect 110 percent of the estimate and be issued by an accredited financial institution licensed to do business in North Carolina. 2. Provisions for protection of existing trees as shown on the approved landscape plan shall be included in a document describing development restrictions and requirements to be prepared by Planning Staff and recorded concurrently with the Final Plat. 5 3. A Type A Land Use Buffer shall be provided along the frontage of Schley Road. The buffer shall be 30 feet in width and provide sufficient vegetation to meet the standards of Section IV-B-8-e of the Subdivision Regulations. Said buffer shall be so noted on the plat, and described in a document describing development restrictions and requirements to be prepared by Planning Staff and recorded concurrently with the Final Plat. D. Parkland 1. Case in the amount of$900.00 [($2,625/acre x 12/35 acre)] shall be paid to Orange County as payment in Lieu of parkland dedication. E. Miscellaneous 1. The Final Plat shall contain a title block and vicinity map in accordance with Section V-D-2 and V-D-3 of the Orange County Subdivision Regulations. F. Certifications 1. A Certificate of Survey and Accuracy signed by a registered Land Surveyor shall be notarized on the face of the Final Plat. 2. A Certificate of Declaration and Maintenance in the form provided in Section V-D-6-b of the Orange County Subdivision Regulations signed by the landowner and developer shall be on the face of the plat and included in a document describing development restrictions to be recorded concurrently with the Final Plat. 3. The Department of Environmental Health shall certify that all residential lots contain sufficient area for septic tank disposal and repair. 4. The North Carolina Department of Transportation shall certify that Ivaada Drive has been constructed to State standards or that construction plans have been approved. 5. A Certificate of Approval signed by the Orange County Planning and Inspections Department. i Signature of Applicant Clerk to the Board I, , accept the above listed conditions of subdivision approval, and acknowledge that each must be met prior to recordation of the final plat. APPLICATION FOR PRELIMINARY PLAN APPROVAL 6 MAJOR SUBDIVISION 8/93 ORANGE COUNTY _ DATE: PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT (INK ONLY) SUBDIVISION NAME: — 2Ew i n� I^/ LOCATION: OWNER/DEVELOPER: ADDRESS: O C'-IL2,4 r IU- TELEPHONE NO.(I l qi AGENT/CONTACT: TELEPHONE NO.: A. SUMMARY INFORMATION: Grange County Tax Map �_ Block j7 d 11 Lot(s) Township '5�J0 Zoning District(s): �lC�'!G�c I++ra./ r'.•.,rr�o iv-fr, i Total Number of Acres: . SZ Phases: Total Number of Lots: –17? Average Lot Size: Minimum Lot Size: %• r Number/Type of Structures: (existing) rV�brl rr (proposed) Lineal Feet in Streets: /75-0., -� Acres in Open Space: 11blie Water Supply: Wt1t Public (specify) Community Individua Wastewater Disposal:�j— c Public (specify) Community n widua School District: Fire'District: v o General Land Uses in Area: 16%,d Critical Areas: stream/drainageways flood prone areas watershed (specify) historic sites other (explain) Is the property to be subdivided currently under "farm use value taxation'? Yes,No-�/. If "yes", please contact the Orange County Tax Office. Subdivision of the property may require payment of deferred taxes under "farm use value taxation% B. All plats must be submitted on sheet no smaller than one inch equals two-hundred feet 0 200') and no larger than one inch equals twenty feet 0 20') and must contain the fonowing'information: °. subdivision name zoning of tract and adjacent. %a name & address of owner(s) properties name &address of subdivider building setback lines by notation (if other than owner) or typical lot layout a name of surveyor, engineer, E R location and width of existing and o landscape architect or architect, proposed easements (drainage, address, registration #and seal utilities, roads, etc.) CU (title) Preliminary Plan existing, proposed and adjoining ° \ scale, north arrow rights-of-way including dimensions m �_ E'st"> date (including revision dates) and street names and state road Cn U E 4-4 township,tax map-block-lot numbers. Lineal feet of road 4J w references centerlines and approximate Parent Parcel Identification # acreage of new street rights-of- dead book and page #of property way 4J 44+ to be subdivided ' existing and proposed utilities, CL m \ boundary described with bearings �" including type, sizes, hydrants, IRE ;4 and distances valves, manholes total acreage of the tract and existing and proposed curbs, Y acreage of lots, including and gutters and culverts, including u excluding area within rights-of- sizes and grades L \ way location and width of alleys, V N control corner sidewalks, bike(ones, transit systems, and but stops (please complete reverse side) • A proposed lot lines with dimensions ✓ Typical Street cross-sections and lot & block numbers intersection details including phasing lines design and width of travalway and topography at ton foot (10) shoulders ­4 intervals horizontal alignment and general o water bodies, streams, floodway curve data (public roads) and floodplains centerline radius on all proposed V) stream buffers streets (D location and size of parcels permanent features such as (n U dedicated for public use, buildings, cemeteries, historic E .14 Q) L64 recreational use or reserved in landmarks -W 4-4 ­4 0 common, with purpose noted adjoining lot layout names of .0 impervious surface data (if located adjoining property owners. If a) in water supply watershed) subdivided, subdivision plat name, Im vicinity map showing general plat book & page number, and CL a) location of subdivision with streets perimeter lot numbers. C �4 cc and roads identified by State road location and size of lots of U number and name restricted development potential landscaping and buffer and notation on plat regarding L) -0 a) cc requirements same -C (n township, corporate end extra- stormwater detention and/or territorial planning jurisdiction lines retention sites and undisturbed which cross the property areas for infiltration purposes (if located in water supply watershed) C. OTHER SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS 1 Twenty-five (25) copies of the preliminary plat. 2. One full size copy of an Orange County Tax map (with tax parcels involved clearly marked in pencil). 3. Where municipal or OWASA sewer is not available, a copy of the Preliminary Plat indicating Health Department soils analysis approval/denial for each lot shown thereon. 4. Where a private road is proposed a written statement by the applicant or his/her authorized representative which sets forth the justification for a private road (see Section IV-8-3-d-1 of the Orange County Subdivision Regulations). 5. Auxiliary documents, in draft form, prepared in accordance with Section VL of.this Ordinance which assure completion and/or maintenance of improvements required by this Ordinance. Such documents may include, but not be limited to, a private road maintenance j!e,.racment, and articles of incorporation and restrictive covenants pertaining to a homeowner's association. These documents may be required as necessary as evidence that the ordinance requirements are being met. 8. Fee - $350.00 plus $5.00 per lot 0 fee for preliminary and final plat). 7. If the subdivision contains 10 lots or more the following information shall be submitted with the application: 8. Number of years to buildout. b. Number of houses to be built during each year to buildout. C. Average price of houses including lots for each year to buildout. 1, the applicant, hereby certify that the foregoing application is complete and accurate. -,7 APPUC�tS SIGNATURE OWNER'S IGNATURE 4ATE /bATE FEES:' Amount Date Paid _/.2 45- - Receipt # Q 7�q Flying W. Estates Applicant: L.M.Walker 8 Zoning: AR & L-ENO-PW LUP: Agrigultural Residential WI Lower Eno Protected Watershed I 88 TOWN SHIP TOWNSHIP O0730 9A \ �T� 4634 �39� \ � SEE ;SEE 11,35 AC. 697 9C \ LF MAP 27- 17 .P 15AC. 7 4055 AC LITTLE ROVER TOWNSHIP 26.5 AC. 2 1.98CC 9439 \� 2'7 1.98 ze \\ OLA MAE AAS \ \ 1 \\\ 5288 10 s\I.92AG I I \\\ 1.46. 61015/ ° 41 L90 AC• 9913 10 I 17A i I / 568 �'>�\ 13A . t � s I 5.09 AC, .I 3 AC. 1.6 AC. i 17 SA i 1164 12 i 20.56 AC. 156. �\ 3996 1.5 AG 19 + 1838 2880 16 1 16 I 6 .89AC• 1.35 y AC _ 1530 L3 2.17AC 16 5• 6 I 1725 FU I 7 4 2331 SEE Z MAP 10-44 133 A C.(C.) Pi0 150.07 AC 4" ' I 9 FISCAL IMPACT ANALYSIS FOR FLYING W ESTATES SUBDIVISION RESIDENTIAL SERVICE STANDARD APPROACH Prepared by The Orange County Planning Department March, 1995 PROJECT DESCRIPTION Flying W Estates Subdivision is a proposed 12-lot major subdivision located in Eno Township on the southwest side of Schley Road. The total area of the subdivision is 25 acres, and the current zoning is AR-Agriculture Residential.The average lot size is approximately 1.85 acres.All lots will be served by individual wells and septic tanks, and public roads. For Flying W Estates, project build-out is estimated at two years. Housing units will be constructed, beginning in 1995, with completion of the project scheduled for 1996. Units will consist of detached single-family homes,and the applicant estimates the average sales price to be$150,000,including the lot. METHODOLOGY Fiscal impact analysis is a projection of the direct, current, public costs and revenues associated with residential and non residential growth in the jurisdiction in which the growth is taking place. Fiscal impact analysis considers only direct impact in that it projects only the primary costs that will be incurred and the immediate revenues that will be generated. It calculates the financial effect of a planned development or new subdivision by considering the current costs and revenues such a development would generate if it were completed and occupied today.Fiscal impact analysis does not consider the private costs of public action. It is concerned only with public (governmental) costs and revenues. The method used in preparing the fiscal impact analysis is the Service Standard Approach. While only gross expenditures by service category are derived from the Per Capita Method,the Service Standard method determines the total number of additional employees by service function that will be required as a result of growth. This method employs average county government costs per person, average school costs per pupil, an employee to population ratio, and average operating expenses per employee for each service category and school district. The number of new employees are projected and multiplied times the average operating expenses(includes personnel,operating and capital costs)per employee. These average costs are then weighed against per capita and per pupil revenues to project the total net fiscal impact of the development. 10 TABLE OF CONTENTS SERVICE STANDARD APPROACH PROJECT FISCAL IMPACT ANALYSIS Section 1 - Project Data Project Name, Township, School District Beginning Year, Ending Year, Inflation Characteristics of Households Construction Schedule/Cost Data Section 2 - Local Government and School District Data Budget Year Per Capita Revenues Per Capita Expenditures Per Student Expenditures School District Per Employee Expenditures Employees Per 1000 Population County Per Employee Expenditure Other Data Other Model Constants School District Data Section 3 - Demographic Projections Based On Project Data Total Housing Total Population School Children Additional County Employees Total School District Additional Employees Section 4 - Projected Net Fiscal Impact on County Tax Base Revenues Expenditures Net Fiscal Impact Section b - Projected Net Fiscal Impact on School District Revenues Expenditures Net Fiscal Impact Section 6 - Summary of Projected Impacts Additional Housing Additional Population Additional School Children Tax Base County Government Balance School District Balance Total Net Fiscal Impact EXPLANATION OF TERMS AND DATA SOURCES • 11 EXPLANATION OF TERMS AND DATA SOURCES SECTION 1 - PROJECT DATA Project data includes information about the specific development project. Much, if not all, of the information is supplied by the applicant. Data inputs include: Project Name: Name of the project. Township: Township in which the project is located. School District: School district in which the project is located. Beginning Year: The first year of the project in which dwelling units are completed and occupied. Ending Year- The last year in which dwelling units are completed and occupied. The template is set to calculate fiscal impacts for a ten-year period. Inflation Rate: Unless an inflation rate is entered, the template will calculate fiscal impacts based on constant dollars. Since the inflation rate changes frequently, the Finance Department must be contacted for the most recent figure. Persons/Household:The estimated average number of persons/household(dwelling unit) based on 1990 Census data for the township in which the project is located.This information is supplied by the Planning Department and will be updated as necessary using population projections and building permit data. Children/Household: The estimated average number of school age children/household (dwelling unit) based on 1990 Census data for the township in which the project is located. This information is supplied by the Planning Department and will be updated as necessary using school membership data %Non-Elderly:N.C.General Statutes permit an$11,000 exemption to the elderly and disabled who meet certain income criteria. In the event that elderly units are part of the project, the percentage of eligible non-elderly units is entered. The tax base will automatically be adjusted to reflect the exemption. Number of Homes: The number o w f dwelling units to be constructed in the project in each ear. �g P of Y Average Sales Price:The average sales price of all dwelling units based on the number and sales price of dwelling unit types to be constructed in each year. 12 SECTION 2 - LOCAL GOVERNMENT AND SCHOOL DISTRICT DATA Local government data includes information regarding expenditures required to provide County services and revenues received based on the approved Orange County budget for the fiscal year in which the project is considered for approval.All information derived from the approved budget remains constant throughout a fiscal year (July-June) and is changed only with the approval of a new budget. Local government revenue and expenditure information is compiled on a per capita (per person) basis. Per capita figures are derived by dividing the total expenditures for a particular service function or revenue source by the estimated population of Orange County for the year in which the project is considered for approval. Populations estimates are prepared by the Planning Department. Data inputs include the following: Budget Year: The current fiscal year; i.e., 1994-95. Per Capita Revenues: The sources of revenue by major category are as follows: Taxes-Other Than Property:Revenues from taxes other than property taxes include those from sales and use taxes, franchise taxes, and animal taxes. Intergovernmental Aid: Revenues from this source, in the form of categorical aid or shared-tax revenues, are provided through State and federal assistance programs. Service Charges: Service (or user) charges support numerous functions and are charged to those who voluntarily receive governmental services or use governmental facilities. Miscellaneous: Miscellaneous revenues include interest earnings on investments,proceeds from license and permit fees, and all other revenues. Per Capita Expenditures: Expenditures by major category are as follows: General Government: Services related to the legislative, administrative, financial, and legal functions of government. Public Safety: Law enforcement services and emergency medical services. Public Works: Efforts related to the maintenance of County-owned property and the provision of sanitation (solid waste disposal) services. Human Services: Departments responsible for the provision of health, social, and recreation-related services. Education: Orange County supports two school units, the Orange County school system and the Chapel Hill\Carrboro school system. This category includes appropriations made to the designated school system for Recurring Capital items. Recurring Capital funds are used for general maintenance,purchase of new equipment/furnishings and vehicle maintenance. Non-Departmental: Contributions to agencies providing cultural and social services outside the formal structure of county government. Other expenditures include equipment replacement and contingency funds. Although there are no employees generated by this category,it has been included as an operating expenditure. It will be included in Section 4,"Total Annual County Expenditure." These expenditures will be calculated on a per capita basis as opposed to a per employee basis. 13 Per Student Expenditures:Information regarding expenditures required to provide educational services and revenues received are based on the approved school system budgets for the fiscal year in which the project is considered for approval. All information derived from the approved budgets remains constant throughout a fiscal year (July-June) and is changed only with the approval of new budgets. Expenditure information is compiled on a per student basis for County Government Current Expense, School District and State appropriations. County Government Current Expense funds are used for general operation purposes including Instruction and Support Services. Federal revenues and expenditures and other local revenues such as Fund Balance have not been included since they are not directly growth related. Per student figures are derived by dividing the total appropriation for educational purposes from a particular source by the estimated number of students to be enrolled in the applicable school system for the year in which the project is considered for approval. Student enrollments are obtained from the approved school system budgets. County Government: Expenditures in this category are based on appropriations to the school systems by Orange County for Current Expense. The minimum level of per student appropriation is determined by the State Board of Education. School District:Expenditures in this category are unique to the Chapel Hill-Carrboro school system and are based on the level of expenditures possible through assessment of a supplementary school tax. State: Expenditures in this category are based on appropriations from the State Board of Education. School District Per Employee Expenditure: Expenditures per employee based on County, School District and State appropriations, and the total number of school district employees. Employees Per 1000 Population: The number of employees in a particular service category per 1000 population. County Per Employee Expenditure: The average operating and capital expenses per employee in a particular service category. Total expenses in each category includes personnel,operating and capital costs. Other Data: County Government Tax Rate: The County tax rate per $100 of assessed valuation. Since the per capita method focuses only on operating expenditures,the tax rate is reduced by an amount equal to the debt service payments from property taxes for capital projects. School District Tax Rate:The supplementary tax assessed on behalf of the Chapel Hill-Carrboro school system. Assessment Ratio:The ratio of market(sales)value to assessed value based on information supplied by the Tax Office. The assessment ratio is used to convert market value to assessed value for the purpose of computing the tax base. Other Model Constants Elderly Exemption:For projects developed partially or exclusively for elderly(65 and older) or disabled individuals whose annual income does not exceed$12,000, an$11,000 tax exemption is used in projecting the tax base. School District Employees Per Student: The number of employees per student in a specific school district. 14 SECTION 3 - DEMOGRAPHIC PROJECTIONS BASED ON PROJECT DATA Demographic projections provide information about the number of new residents and school children anticipated in Orange County resulting from project development.Projections also provide the number of additional employees required per service function and school district as a result of the new development. Total Housing Units: The cumulative total of new housing units added each year by project development. Total Population:The total population added each year by a project derived by multiplying the number of homes to be constructed by the number of persons per household (see Section 1). School Population: The total number of school children added each year by a project derived by multiplying the number of homes constructed by the number of children per household (see Section 1). Additional County Employees: The number of additional employees required per service c, dory based on project development. Total: Total of all additional county employees required based on project development. School District Additional Employees: The number of additional employees required per school district based on the project development. SECTION 4 - PROJECTED NET FISCAL 11KPACT ON COUNTY Tax Base:The tax base represents the increase in assessed property value expected each year resulting from project development.The values shown are in$1,000's and are derived from a formula which includes the number and sales price of homes, and the assessment ratio. Where applicable, the percentage of non-elderly units and elderly exe---._ption are also used. Revenues:All revenues are derived from a formula which multiplies the per capita revenues (Section 2) times the projected population (Section 3).The exception to this is the property tax which multiplies the tax base times the county government tax rate. Expenditures: All expenditures are derived from a formula which multiplies the per employee expenditure (Section 2) times the number of additional employees (Section 3). Net Fiscal Impact: The net balance is the difference between projected expenditures and projected revenues. A negative net balance indicates that it costs Orange County more to provide services to a project than it receives in revenues.A positive net balance indicates that more revenues are received than it costs to serve a project. Positive net balances in one project may thus be used to offset negative balances in another. 15 SECTION 8 - PROJECTED NET FISCAL IMPACT ON SCHOOL DISTRICT Revenues: The County contribution is derived by transferring education expenditures by County government(Section 4).Revenues derived from the school district tax are derived by multiplying the school district tax times the tax base. State revenues are derived by multiplying the per student expenditure figure times the total projected number of school children (Section 3). Expenditures: Expenditures are derived from a formula which multiplies each per student expenditure (Section 2) times the total projected number of school children (Section 3) and adding the results. Net Fiscal Impact: The net balance is the difference between projected expenditures and projected revenues. A negative net balance indicates that it costs the school system more to provide educational services for children in a project than it receives in revenues.A positive net balance indicates that more revenues are received than it costs to serve a project.Positive net balances in one project may thus be used to offset negative balances in another. SECTION 6 - SUMMARY OF PROJECTED IMPACTS SECTION ? - SUMMARY OF PROJECTED PUBLIC SCHOOL CAPACITY IMPACTS RESIDENTIAL FISCAL IMPACT TEMPLATE: SERVICE STANDARD METHOD 16 Bureau of Economic dt Business Research — University of Florida Modified 3/15/95 — Orange County,NC Planning Department SECTION 1 — PROJECT DATA: ENTER THE FOLLOWING DATA FOR EACH PROJECT: PROJECT: Flying W Estates Subdivision TOWNSHIP• Eno CONSTRUCTION PERIOD: Beginning Year: 1995 Ending Year: 1996 Inflation Rate:-..: 2.90% CHARACTERISTICS OF HOUSEHOLDS: Persons/ House: ..... 2.51 Children/House: 0....44 %& on-Elderly:. 100.00% HOME SALES DATA: Average Distribution Number of Sales Price of Units Year Homes S by Year . .:. .. :.:: 6 150000 >.::.:<:.:.::. :::; 50.00% 1996 6 150000 50.00% : :~....g.. .: ; 0::; 0.000/0 1998 0 0 0.000/0 :.1999: 2000 0 0 0.000/0 2001::: Q -:..tl .::;: 0.00% 2002 0 0 0.000/0 0.0we 2004 0 0 0.000/0 SCHOOL DISTRICT DATA: ENTER"1"IN( )BESIDE SCHOOL DISTRICT IN WHICH PROJECT IS TO BE LOCATED TO GENERATE STUDENT DISTRIBUTION BY SCHOOL TYPE. School District: School Attendance: an ( _.... .......... . ) ::.:.. ... ... Elemen tarySchocfl ;. .: ::;.....:...::: 50°,1'0 Middle School 23% Chapel Hi}1=Carrlioro _':>:.;>' 0 Shol.. 2Hi 7% SCHOOL AGE CHELDREN/HOUSEHOLD: ENTER NUMBER OF UNITS BY HOUSING TYPE TO GENERATE NUMBER OF SCHOOL AGE CHILDREN. Children School Age Housing a Units Per House Children Single-fiamil . 044 5. Duplex/rriplex/Quadplex 0 0 0 Apar,tatent/Condominium. 4, Q p Town House 0 0 0 Totals . . 12-:11 5 SECTION 2 — LOCAL GOVERNMENT AND SCHOOL DISTRICT DATA 17 BUDGET YEAR:. 1994-95 COUNTY POPULATION: 102894 SCHOOL DISTRICT STUDENT POPULATION: 5582 COUNTY EMPLOYMENT: POSITIONS PER CAPITA General Government 110.08 0.0011 Public Safety 138.75 0.0013 Public Works.. 50.00 0.0005 Human Services 25338 0.0025 Education School District 619.00 0.0060 SCHOOL DISTRICT EMPLOYMENT: POSITIONS PER STUDENT Total 619.00 0.1109 COUNTY PER CAPITA REVENUES (S): REVENUES PER CAPITA Taxes Other Than 1?roperty; 4387997. .42.65 Intergovernmental 9053572 87.99 Service:Charges:..:.::.::.::.. ;:; : 271516I : : :.;' 2639 Miscellaneous 1089416 10.59 COUNTY PER CAPITA EXPENDITURES S : EXPENDITURES PER CAPITA General Govermm �t: : .... :. 6532720 63.49 Public Safety 6350477 61.72 Public Works: :;=: - 2(39666 : » : . 26.63 Human Services 16618148 16151 :Education(Recurring.Ca tai ; - . 750000_.. ::. "` :..,:.:: ;7.29 (. g ...I?i...). .. Non—Departmental 2787882 27.09 COUNTY PER EMPLOYEE EXPENDITURE S : EXPENDITURES PER EMPLOYEE General G �erttmetit . :6532710 : : .9347.81, Public Safety 6350477 4576920 Pubhc:VFio : 2'F 9666.::: ': 547 2 Iks 3.... Human Services 16618148 65587.17 ..... .: .. :......::. ... Education Reciirriit Ca"tai ::::::::;: : <:: 750000..:.. :` 1211.63 SCHOOL DISTRICT PER STUDENT EXPENDITURES S : EXPENDITURES PER STUDENT 1 Coon Gc ernttiucnt:>::>>:;:::::: ..;::::: >. >.>> » 8099482.:: .. 4 1. tY.. _... School District 0 0.00 State::: 18 3399.84 SCHOOL DISTRICT PER EMPLOYEE EXPENDITURES ($ : EXPENDITURES PER EMPLOYEE Count y Government SQ99482.. :'.;' 13084.79 School District 0 0.00 State - 18977908. :: 3065898 TAX DATA: ENTER APPLICABLE ASSESSMENT RATIO AND ELDERLY EXEMPTION: County.Tax Rate 0.7460 Per$100 Assessed Valuation.. School District Tax Rate (S) 0.0000 Per$100 Assessed Valuation Assessment Ratio 100A0 Elderly Exemption 0 $11,000 Where Applicable 18 ' SECTION 3 - DEMOGRAPHIC PROJECTIONS BASED ON PROJECT DATA ` YEAR 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 HOUSING UNITS 6 12 12. 12 12 POPULATION i5 31 31 31 31 SCHOOL CHILDREN Elementary 1 3 3 3 3 Middle I 1 1 1 1 High School I 1 1 1 1 TOTAL 3. 5 5. 5 5 COUNTY GOVERNMENT :.. ADDITIONAL EMPLOYEES General Government 6.0 0.0 OA: 0.0 U O Public Safety 4.0 0.0 OA: 0.0 0.0 Public Works 0.0 0.0 0,0:. 0.0 0.0 Human Services 0.0. 0.1 0.1 0.1 TOTAL ;0.1.. 0.2 Q.2., 0.2 _ ... . 0.2 SCHOOL DISTRICT 0.1 0.2 : 0.2: 0:2 ADDITIONAL EMPLOYEES - YEAR 2000 2001 `'' < '22002: 2003 2004 HOUSING UNITS 12. 12 12 POPULATION ::`<:>«' : 31 31 31:2: 31 : : .31 SCHOOL CHILDREN Elementary Middle :.....:..:.:.::.: :::.. High School TOTAL g:.: 5 <::: >:5` 5 S COUNTY GOVERNMENT ADDITIONAL EMPLOYEES General Government (IA 0.0 40" 0.0 0.0 ° :: Public Safety '0.0 0.0 DA 0.0 Q.Q Public Works .... :0:0; 0.0 O.fi 0.0 0.4 Human Services O:I 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 TOTAL - . . 0.2 0.2 0:2: 0.2 0.2 SCHOOL DISTRICT 0:2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 ADDITIONAL EMPLOYEES SECTION 4 — PROJECTED FISCAL IMPACT OF PROJECT ON COUNTY GOVERNMENT 19 YEAR 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 TAX BASE($1000) 900 1826 1879 1934 1990 REVENUES ($) Property Tax 6714: 13623 14018 14424 14843 Other Taxes 658 1353 1393 1433 1475 Intergovernmental 1357 2792 2873 2957 3042 Service Charges 407 837 - 862 887 912 Miscellaneous 163 336 346 356 366 TOTAL ($) 9299 18942 19491 20056 20638 EXPENDITURES ($) General Government 979 2015 2073 2133 2195 Public Safety 952. 1959 2015 2074 . 2134 Public Works 4I1 845 869 895 921 Human Services 2490 5125 5274 5427 5584 Education 3943.. 8115 8350. 8592 8841 Non—Departmental ... :418: 860 885 910 937 TOTAL (S) 9193: 18918 19467 20031 :. 20612 NET FISCAL IMPACTS 106 23 " 24 25 : 26 YEAR ZEIUO' 2001 2002. 2003 -: 2004 TAX BASE($1000) 2047; 2107 2168': 2231 2295 REVENUES ($) Property Tax 15273 15716 16172 16641 .17123 Other Taxes ;:<?:1S 17: 1561 ::,1607. 1653 ]7Q i Intergovernmental 3431:: 3221 ;:.: 3315: 3411 3510 Service Charges 939.; 966 994 1023 1053 Miscellaneous 377': 388 399. 410 422 TOTAL ($) 21236: 21852 22486 23138 23809 EXPENDITURES(S) General Government .=2259 2324 2392 2461 2533 Public Safety 2196 2260 2325 2393 22. Public Works 947. 975 1003:: 1032 1062 Human Services 5746, 5913 6084 6261 6442 Education 9362 9633:. 9913 . 10200 Non—Departmental 964: 992 1021 1050 1081 TOTAL ($) 2121G 21825 22459 23109 23780 NET FISCAL IMPACTS 26 27 28 29 29 20 SECTION 5 — PROJECTED FISCAL IMPACT OF PROJECT ON SCHOOL DISTRICT YEAR 1995 1996 . 1997 1998 1999 REVENUES (S) County 3943 8115 8350 8592 8841 School District 0 0 0 0 0 State 8976. 18472 19007 19559 . 20126 TOTAL (S) 12919. 26587 27358 28151 28967 EXPENDITURES (S) County 3943 8115 8350_ 8592 :: 8841 School District 0 0 0 0 0 State 8976 18472 19007 19559 20126 TOTAL (S) 12919 26587 27358 28151 . : 28967 NET FISCAL IMPACT S) 0 0 0:: 0 0 YEAR 2000 2001 2002: 2003 2004 REVENUES(S) County 9098: 9362 : 9633 9913 10200 _. School District State 20709; 21310 21928: 22564 .23218 TOTAL ($) <;29807: 30672 ,31561. 32476 33418 EXPENDITURES ($) County 9098':: 9362 9633 9913 10200 School District ;` :':'; :::;.::::f}. 0 :. ::' . ; 0 0 0 State -- .207091. 21310 21928':. 22564 23218 TOTAL (S) 2980.7 30672 :31561:: 32476 33418 NET FISCAL IMPACTS 0 0 <_ a:: 0 0 SF✓CTION 6 — SUMMARY OF PROJECTED DEMOGRAPHIC/FISCALIMPACTS 21 YEAR 1995 1996 1997 1998 . 1999 HOUSING UNITS 6 12 12 12 12 POPULATION 15 31 31. 31 31 SCHOOL CHILDREN Elementary 1 3 3 3 3 Middle 1 1 1 1 1 High School 1 1 1 1 1 TOTAL 3 5 5 5 S COUNTY EMPLOYEES O.I 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 SCHOOL EMPLOYEES 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 TAX BASE($1000) 900 1826 1879 1934 1990 COUNTY BUDGET($) Revenues 9299 18942 19491 20056 20638 Expenditures 9193 18918 19467 20031 20612 BALANCE 106 23 24 25 26 SCHOOL DISTRICT BUDGET $ Revenues 12919 26587 27358.: 28151 28967 Expenditures 12919 26587 27358 28151 '28967 BALANCE O O »: 0 0 COMBINED BUDGETS($) Revenues 22217: 45528 >.46849: 48207 . 49605 Expenditures 22111' 45505 '' : 46824 48182 ':: .49580 BALANCE aOb` 23 24_ 25 26. YEAR ::..20.... 2001 2Q02 2003 2004 HOUSING UNITS 12;: 12 12 12 :: 12 POPULATION °..31 31 3i::: 31 "; 31 SCHOOL CHILDREN Elementary `3 3 3:: 3 3 Middle High School TOTAL 5: S 5 S 5 COUNTY EMPLOYEES 0.2 0:2 0.2 `.' 0.2 SCHOOL EMPLOYEES 0:2: 0.2 G.2. : 0.2 TAX BASE($1000) 204?. 2107 <:' .2168: 2231 .:. . 2295 COUNTY BUDGET($) , .......::::::.....: Revenues 21236 21852 224$6 23138 :: 23809 Expenditures `: `'21210 21825 ` :.::"° ° . 22458: 23109 2378D BALANCE ......... 27 '>:_ 28' 29 29 SCHOOL DISTRICT BUDGET $ Revenues 29807: 30672 31561; 32476 33418 Expenditures 29807 30672 31561: 32476 ..' 33418 BALANCE p p . p.: p .: p COMBINED BUDGETS($) Revenues 51044 52524 54047 55615 57227 Expenditures 51017 52497 54019 55586 57198 . BALANCE 26 27 28 29 29 SECTION 7 - SUMMARY OF PROJECTED PUBLIC SCHOOL CAPACITY IMPACTS 22 SCHOOL DISTRICT DATA: ENTER"1"IN( )BESIDE SCHOOL DISTRICT IN WHICH PROJECT IS TO BE LOCATED TO GENERATE STUDENT DISTRIBUTION BY SCHOOL TYPE. School District: School Attendance: Orange County., .... (: 1 ) Elementary School 50% Middle School 23% Cba i Hill—Carrboro 0 High School . 27% YEAR 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 SCHOOL CHILDREN Elementary 1 3 3 3 3 Middle 1 1 1 1 1 High School 1 1 1 1 1 TOTAL - 3 5 5 5 5 YEAR 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 SCHOOL CHILDREN Elementary 3: 3 3. 3 3. Middle High School TOTAL :::::. $ 5 5 $ . '5 SCHOOL CAPACITIES-ALL SCHOOLS CURRENT ENROLLMENT -ALL SCHOOLS Elementary ::2838 :. Elementary 2777 Middle 1232 Middle 1294 ... . . .:: .. . Hi h School 1518 i gh School;: ;. : 1511 TOTAL 5588 TOTAL 5582 YEAR 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 PROJECTED ENROLLMENT Elementary a::2778 2780 2780. 2780 :: ... ... .278Q Middle I29S,: 1295 : . : .: 1295: 1295 1295 High School 1512 I512: 1512 1512 TOTAL ;: : 5585 5587 5587.. 5587 .5587 YEAR 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 PROJECTED ENROLLMENT Elementary 2780: 2780 2784 2780 . 2780 Middle L'JS 1295 >:.: 1295 1295 1295 High School 15.12. 1512 1512'. 1512 1512 TOTAL 5587 5587 ".: 5587 5587 5587 r 23 HOUSEHOLD OCCUPANCY CHARACTERISTICS FOR ORANGE COUNTY, NC BY TOWNSHIP (4) (5) Children, Children School Age., School Age Number Persons ;...Persons Under 18 Under 18 Children Children Of. In_: Per In Per In.. Per Townshi Households Households Household .Households Household 'Households Household 1990 CENSUS .Bingham.':*: 2156.::::`:.: : 5177., . >.. 2.40 : 1122 . . 0.52'. 721 . 033 Cedar Grove 1345 3676 2.73 865 0.64 624 0.46 Chapel Hill:'::<': 23942. : ;:53108 .: 2.22_: .:.. 9939 0.42..>:. 6980: -... 0.29 Cheeks 2036 5422 2.66 1340 0.66 999 0.49 1285' ©.63:;;:::::. 8% : 0.44 Hillsborough 3811 9816 258 2567 0.67 1777 0.47 Tattle: River - :<777-: ...: 2183:' .< .: :: 580. 0.75 .402'..':::-:::'. 0.52 Orange County 36104 84627 2.34 17698 0.49 12399 0.34 1980 CENSUS Biaghaal:: <.::. 1560::: : 3954;: `<': 2.38 .. .: :.':: I021:`.. Q.62.. N 56 .......... .. Cedar Grove 1176 3166 2.69 919 0.78 N/A 0.66 Cha e ,:...>1859}::.::>:<:>: SQ572;:: 2.72::;:» 8379...:.; 0 7 . .P...:..: ...::.. .: .:..:::: :..:...... :.... .::::. ;1�f.A:;::>.::.: ,6 Cheeks 1693 4821 2.85 1466 0.87 N/A 0.70 ..;:.:.;;;;::;:::: :: End;::::::':;:::': :<<....> ;:>;:::: 450 ;:...... 2.51:::::<>: :-. ::;>1230- :....:.,> Q.69..............................: N A.::..::...:......<...:.0.62 Hillsborough 3233 8599 2.66 2421 0.75 N/A 0.65 : Little River::.:.<:: S76:;»; >°>:: °.143..;.:::::.::.:...: 259 : :: :>::: 443 0:17 0.64 [Orange Coun 28707 77055 2.68 15879 0.55 N/A N/A NOTES: (1)Number of households included under 1980 Census data is number of housing units. (2)Persons in households included 1980 Census data includes population in households as well as group quarters. (3)Number of children under 18 years of age includes children living in group quarters due to lack of breakdown by household in available Census data. (4)Data not available from 1980 Census. (5)1980 data calculated using demographic multipliers from 'The New Practitioner's Guide to Fiscal Impact Analysis"by Burchell,listokin,and Dolphin. NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES- FY 1994-95 ORANGE COUNTY BUDGET 24 1994 ORANGE COUNTY POPULATION 102894 PERMANENT FTE % OF % OF POSITIONS FUNCTION POSITIONS SUBTOTAL TOTAL PER CAPITA GENERAL GOVERNMENT Commissioners .3.225: 293% 0.15% 0.00003 Courts WA 0.00% 0.00% 0.00000 Etectiorm 3.500 3.1896 0.17% 4.00003 Manager 8.000 7.27% 0.38% 0.00008 Personnel 7.000 6.36%. ..;:;.. :. ;:0.33% 0.00007 Budget 3.000 2.73% 0.14% 0.00003 Finance.' ..5.000 4.54°.f::`::: :<:.:::::.:0.24.%. ,:.. :.:::'':: 000005 Purchasing 3.000 2.73% 0.14% 0.00003 w. Data Processin 5.600 5.0S%-*'...;:.":..,::;:.0:27%: :` 0:00005:. Central Services 3.000 2.73% 0.14% 0.00003 4, 3.40 ... 00014 R rat f. 750... 1 % ':::;_:':<: 0096 >.;>:.: >:;:;::>..0 Tax Assessor 18.000 16.35% 0.85% 0.00017 ;::>::::.;.:......... ...... ..... .. ....... . ............... ... .. ..... . . ..... o -: -: - ;000<::`d.>,.. 6.36%:<>::: Q33%::..'_:';;:::.}€>€:> : 0.0000T ..:fend:Rec rds::.:::.. ........... ..... ........ . .............................. ... .. Tax Collector 6.000 5.45% 0.28% 0.00006 .;:,... ...:.:.......::::::..:.:....::.:: ...:..:.. ...:::..::..:..:..:. ......: ...:.... ....:..:.:.:..._:.. :....:. .:...:::::::.::.:_:.:..:._:.. Pranning&lnspsctlons: '<: ,..:.....:.:. ::>: 20.899&:': :_<:::: ;:`:;109% 0.00022 SUBTOTAL 110.075 100.00% 5.22% 0.00107 PUBLIC SAFETY s�erdf...... ...... 9Q25Q:<; >>.:::; ...::>::85... .... ......:>;::::>:>;::<:�€2&%:><>>::::<::>:::>:::>::: adad68 ...... ..................................... .. Domestic Violence 1.000 0.72% 0.05% 0.00001 . . :: 500<Eme r e 47 .;: SUBTOTAL 138.750 100.00% 6.58% 0.00135 PUBLIC WORKS ,.. . ;.:;::. 28.0Q0.... ...... 56:00%.::...:::.:,:';.,.:1:3396.:...' ;::;:':::.:::::>i;::r 0.00027:: Other WA 0.000A 0.004A 0.00000 <afl0005. 0:24 ;..:Motoc Pool:.. :?: < :» .. .....................:....::........... Sanitation 17.000 34.00% 0.81% 0.00017 SUBTOTAL 50.000 100.00% 237% 0.00049 HUMAN SERVICES ... ...:.... ;... :... ...::.0.00004. son r. :>::::.... >:; ::::«: ::;::: ..- . .. .......4.00ff ::r':..,,:..:;:. :1.5896.:: Ef 1996 Economic Development 3.000 1.18% 0.14% 0.00003 SociaE Services. ..:...;<.::... ... 109.100:' 43.OB9&::":''>:'>: 'z' Sa89G:: ;:'.'.:;:.:."c::<: .. ...... 06 Health 72.075 28.45% 3.42% 0.00070 Agricuttural.Extension. :: ... ... ... . ;: 4.00009- tf.4H Recreation&Parka 11.750 4.64% 0.56% 0.00011 A in 10.600 '.`::':::::: :4.1896:::>: ::.:. ":.0.5096_'-. :;:::;: '!``: :..:• ...1. CAT 112.50 4.44% 0.53% 0.00011 Commission for Wornen:. 2750 .:.:.:: x:0996'`.:.: .:::;.:.Q13% : ... ;:i,.=0003 Library 9.100 3.59% 0.43% 0.00009 Child Support` :..: ,10.000'` 3.95% 0.47% ':0.00010 SUBTOTAL 253.375 100.00% 12.02% 0.00246 NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES- FY 1994-95 ORANGE COUNTY BUDGET 25 (CONTINUED) 1994 ORANGE COUNTY POPULATION 102894 PERMANENT FTE % OF % OF POSITIONS FUNCTION POSITIONS SUBTOTAL TOTAL PER CAPITA EDUCATION Oran a County MY. _619.000 ..,;.39.8096 29.3796 0.00602 Chapel Hil 936.410 60.20% 44.43% 0.00910 SUBTOTAL 1555.410 100.00% 73.80% 0.01512 FUND TOTAL 2107.610 100.00% 100.00% 0.02048 Source:FY 1994-95 Approved Budget,Orange County,N.C. 26 GENERAL FUND REVENUES - FY 1994-95 ORANGE COUNTY BUDGET 1994 ORANGE COUNTY POPULATION 102894 % OF % OF PER CAPITA TYPE AMOUNT SUBTOTAL TOTAL REVENUE PROPERTY TAXES Cur rent.Taxes: : 98.43%.:.:;.: 69.49% Delinquent Taxes $500,000 1.21% 0.85% $4.86 interegtonDelinquentTaxas. "::: $150.000:: 0.26% $t,46 Late LJatings 0.00% 0.00% $0.00 .000% 000% $0.00 Vehicle UiWPenaRres SUBTOTAL $41,407,790 100.00% 70.60% $402.43 OTHER LOCAL TAXES .. ;;:::..:.. ,;;:::,:. .>. S4,:f73,750::: ::.:.:.:... . .:::..:..:. Saba and;UaeT......>:;;:;:.;:.;::: . Privilege Lkense Tax WA 0.00% 0.00% $0.00 ,:; -:... 1:10 '2.T! 1. an hiae;Tax'::;:>::::::::::>:::':'>::>:>:.:<:.>::>:::::::>:;.:::><:.>;>.;. $ ....z:......:::::.............................. ........... Animal Tax $104,000 2.37% 0.18% $1.01 SUBTOTAL $4-387,997 100.00% 7.48% $42.65 INTERGOVERNMENTAL int�ngi6ias?ax:;;::;:; »::::::: >X23.32_ Beer&Wine Tax $168,727 1.86% 0.29% $1.64 . ,;;;;:;•.,.::.... .::::::::.:::::..::::..;;;::.: 0;::.;:::.:i<: 524.':<:,:' ;::r:<:7;:!�.38 $3;. Health::::::..:;;::>::>::::::<:;:::«>::::;::::>: . .... ...... Social Services $4,454,075 49.20% 7.59% $43.29 <: rvico;;;:;::;.;.,: :.;:.;;.:::........:.:: .. ... ad630 :..................... Other State $838,616 9.26% 1.43% $8.15 1473;.000..: SUBTOTAL $9,053,572 100.00% 15.44% $8799 SERVICE CHARGES Land Records $25,800 0.99% 0.05% $0.26 :;:;,:::.,:.;;:::.:;.;;:;,:.:::::»::;.:..:... i.0E1000::;....:: 3.8846.:..:....:..:: Planning Faesr: ;:><::::»:> :;:>:>:>::>::;:::><>i:;: 'r>;:;:::::>::. § :.., Sheriff 7. $773,739 2850% 1. :;:"'.:::::: APS Fees $4,000 0.15% 0.01% $0.04 1457.E Health: :::::i: ;:::i:c°'::'.;:::; :.i:::. ";.;`;:?:•.:17.9796:>: Social Services $0.37 $38,000 1.40% 0.06% 78 .AgirsglC�kT: 'r' : :::::::: . '..:;. X1.75 Rea r eat an& Parka $78,960 291% 0.13% $0•n $77;417` .;:: : ;::;:::285% :. ;;`; 0:13% TeucCoMadion Charges:..:;..;'::.'`:.`: ,...: ;: .. _:.. . . M.iscellaneousCharges $73,800 272% 0.13% $0.72 SUBTOTAL $2,715,167 100.00% 4.63% $2639 27 GENERAL FUND REVENUES - FY 1994-95 ORANGE COUNTY BUDGET (CONTINUED) 1994 ORANGE COUNTY POPULATION 102894 % OF % OF PER CAPITA TYPE AMOUNT SUBTOTAL TOTAL REVENUE MISCELLANEOUS irytarest Earnings...::.:;:. $450,000 41.31% 0.77%..:::'`............ $4.37 .. ..$ . lJcenaes&Permits $462,600 42.46% 0.79% $4.50' At6Oth9aRavanu e..:.,....::<::::::' :;<:: ....;;:.$176,816 16:23% ^: Q309G $1.72' SUBTOTAL $1,089,416 100.00% 1.86% $10S9 FUND TOTAL $58,653,942 100.00% 100.00% $570.04 Source:FY 1994-95 Approved Budget,Orange County,N.C. 28 GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURES- FY 1994-95 ORANGE COUNTY BUDGET 1994 ORANGE COUNTY POPULATION 102894 % OF % OF PER CAPITA TYPE AMOUNT SUBTOTAL TOTAL EXPENSE GENERAL GOVERNMENT Commissioners.. ; $316~506 4.84W 0.55% $3.08 Courts $15,000 0.23% 0.03% $0.15 Elsetlons.>:::'>;::;>::::;l:r 5217,568 .. 3.3396..::.` 0.38% $211 Manager $544,747 8.34% 0.95% $5.29 . 0.70% $,3.91 Personnel::::;:::;.:. :.::_.. 3402.004_ .:..:. .. . 6.1596. _. .. . Budget $157,661 241% 0.27% $1.53 ;:325!x.341 : : :::'...:;;:3.89% ..::::;;'::::...`..0.44%. $2.47 Purchasing $166,711 2.55% 0.29% rr:;-:. Data Procosdn . $g94,83B` ..: :.:.:.7.5796. '.:0.86% : $4.81 ..... ....9 . Central Services $654,644 10.02% 1.14% $6.36 FTogie,c of Deeds;::<:::;:;:;:'<::::;:<:>::: Tax Assessor $761,791 11.66% 1.32% $7.40 W7.: 0.63% Tax Collector $318,585 4.88% 0.55% $3.10 Planning:: , . ' :,$12-07 SUBTOTAL $6,532,710 100.00% 1135% 563.49 PUBLIC SAFETY :663fi9�:;.»:.: Sheri<f.>;::.::.;'.;::.::.::.;;::.;;;;;.;;:.;::;.;..::'.:-.;:.;::.;;:...::.:::< Domestic Violence $38,354 0.62% 0.07% $0.38 096,878 33.029b:.;:;:<:,<::<:<:<>:.:>:;;364%,:. .:::.:..: x20:38' SUBTOTAL $6,350,477 100.00% 11.03% $61.72 PUBLIC WORKS ;. � • ':::.,.;::;::;:.;>>:,::::;::»::;::>:::>:::>;::;:>:<:::<:: ;:::._ ;.: ..':;»::<::.;>:;. .g49f,.....:::::.::.... ..2739&.:::::::::<:::::;.:::;'::': ;:::$)5.29: Other $167,435 6.11% 029% $1.63 "3.35 0.1896;;:::;1>:<::>;: " . '::� Mc....Pool::::::>::......:::......;.:::>:.;:<::::;::::«:>::>:«;::::.::;:;::<>::;:.:::..:;:: ;::..:::'<:>:<:.:'.:::.;:::.::.;:.;:<:;:.. .:.:......... ......................... ....... ....................... ..... Sanitation $9061966 33.10% 1.58% $8.81 SUBTOTAL $2,739,666 100.00% 4.76% $26.63 HUMAN SERVICES SOiI&.1Katet S47Q4981. ........ .:.:... 1.0396.::':..:.:' ...... .....:... .... .. ...... .... .... .. Economic Development $190,177 1.14% 0.33% $1.85 BOWS. .. er�icss :<:;::i»: 59,734,294:;, 58.5894:::::.;>:»::;`:<::::189t%,::... °:..... Health $3,693,873 2223% 6.42% $35.90 Agricuthtrat;F.rdsnsiofl;»;:>;:>r: <:<;:`::�`;"::>::':,.:.; :::::.;;.,.::.;.;.:::<....<. .925.:.:::. ..:::...:.:3,67%;:::::;:::`: ... . . Recreation& Parks $564,896 3.40% 0.98% $5.49 0.9496 -:$524 CAT $423,034 255% 0.73% $4.11 Commiseion m tosWosrt;`' R421;07C. >..:' 0.739:- r Q21% . 31x8 Library $441,711 266% 0.77% $4.29 Child Support $461,420. 27896 0.8096 $4.48. SUBTOTAL $16,618,148 100.00% 28.86% $16151 29 GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURES- FY 1994-95 ORANGE COUNTY BUDGET (CONTINUED) 1.1994 ORANGE COUNTY POPULATION 102894 % OF % OF PER CAPITA TYPE AMOUNT SUBTOTAL TOTAL EXPENSE EDUCATION Cun•ent Expense Orange.County .. $8,964,598 39.7696 15.57%. $87.12 Chapel Hil $12,083,243 53.59% 20.99% $117.43 Recurring Capital Orange County.:;::;:>>:;.::. $750,000. :. 3.33% . .. 1.30%,; $7 29 Chapel Hil $750,000 3.33% 1.30% $7.29 SUBTOTAL $22,547,841 100.00% 39.16% $219.14 NON—DEPARTMENTAL Pi enc . :ontrl?!!tiona; ::: x ;;; > : < '.$2:11.4.a70 75.869fr ;:>'.: s:: 3 67%: .:.: $20.55 Fund Tranfers $15,000 0.54% 0.03% $0.15 eUaneous::: $658;012:: :23.60%:::::::w.::.: ,.: : 1'.t4% SUBTOTAL $2,787,882 100.00% 4.84% $27.09 FUND TOTAL $57,576,724 100.00% 100.00% $55957 Source:FY 1994-95 Approved Budget,Orange County, N.C. © 9Jr 7 DRAFT 3/20/95 PLANNING BOARD MINUTES 30 ttti b. Preliminary Plans ( 1) Flying W Estates ( 12 Lots - Eno Township) Presentation by Eddie Kirk. The property is located on the southwest side of Schley Road (SR 1548) , and is known as lots 17 and 17A of Tax Map 9, Eno Township. It is zoned AR and L-Eno-PW and designated Agricultural Residential and Lower Eno Watershed in the Land Use Element of the Comprehensive Plan. The area proposed for development is 77.57 acres. There are 12 lots proposed with approximately 52 acres remaining in the parcel. Each lot will be served by individual wells and septic tanks. The lots range in size from 1.47 acres to 3.23 acres with an average lot size of 1.85 acres. Access into the subdivision is provided from Schley Road. A public road is proposed to serve the subdivision with a 60 foot right-of-way to be retained to provide access to the remaining 52.29 acre parcel. A 1993 traffic count on Schley Road just east of NC 57 indicated 600 trips per day. The Planning Board approved the Concept Plan for Flying W Estates on December 19, 1994 with two conditions: 1. Lot 1 shall receive access from the subdivision road. 2. The remaining 52.29 acre parcel must meet the minimum road frontage requirements. A condition in the Resolution of Approval will require lot 1 to receive access from the subdivision road and the remaining 52.29 acre tract will meet the minimum frontage requirements on Henry Lane. Agency comments were received from Environmental Health, County Attorney, Soil & Water Conservation, Orange County Recreation & Parks and NCDOT. Applicable comments have been incorporated into the Resolution of Approval. The Planning Staff recommends approval of the Preliminary Plan for Flying W Estates subject to the conditions contained in the Resolution of Approval (an attachment to these minutes on pages ) . 31 just east of NC 57 indicated 600 trips per day. The Planning Board approved the Concept Plan for Flying W Estates on December 19, 1994 with two conditions: 1. Lot 1 shall receive access from the subdivision road. 2. The remaining 52 .29 acre parcel must meet the minimum road frontage requirements. A condition in the Resolution of Approval will require lot 1 to receive access from the subdivision road and the remaining 52.29 acre tract will meet the minimum frontage requirements on Henry Lane. Agency comments were received from Environmental Health, County Attorney, Soil & Water Conservation, Orange County Recreation & Parks and NCDOT. Applicable comments have been incorporated into the Resolution of Approval. The Planning Staff recommends approval of the Preliminary Plan for Flying W Estates subject to the conditions contained in the Resolution of Approval (an attachment to these minutes on pages ) . Rosemond asked if the road cuts through Lot #1. Kirk responded that Lot #1 is all on the north side of the road. There is property on the south side that will be added to the adjoining tract. Rosemond asked about the remaining 52.29 acres. The developer (L. M. Walker) responded that it is partially wooded and partially pasture. The intent is to use it for a horse pasture. She continued asking about further development. Mr. Walker responded that further development would depend on the outcome of this Plan. Barrows asked why Henry Lane is a stubout. Kirk responded that Henry Lane meets the access requirement for the remaining 52.29 acre tract. MOTION: Scott moved approval as recommended by the Planning with the Resolution of Approval. Seconded by Jobsis. VOTE: Unanimous.