HomeMy WebLinkAboutPlanning - Black Walnut Farm - Preliminary Plan - Atty. Letter dated 2-16-95 LAW OFFICES
COLEMAN, GLEDHILL & HARGRAVE ALONZO BROWN COLEMAN,JR.
A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
C O N F I D E N T I A L GEOFFREY E.GLEDHILL
129 E.TRYON STREET DOUGLAS HARGRAVE
P.HI0.LLSBOROUGH,NORTH CAROLINA 2727B DRAWER 1529 KIM K.STEFFAN
HILL ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE JANET B.DUTTON
(919)732.2196 DOUGLAS P.THOREN
FAX(919)732-7997 SAMUEL ELY COLEMAN
February 16, 1995
Moses Carey, Jr. , Chair
William Crowther
Alice Gordon
Stephen Halkiotis
Don Willhoit
Orange County Board of Commissioners
Past Office Box 8181
Hillsborough, North Carolina 27278
RE: Black Walnut Farm Subdivision
Dear Board Members:
The recommended resolution contained in your agenda item
abstract for Black Walnut Farms is the result of the Board' s
directive to County staff to "resolve" the Baldwin Road issues .
Those issues are whether Baldwin Road should be relocated from
its present location, approximately 50 feet from the historic
structure known as "Sunnyside, " and whether it should be
relocated to provide an alignment with a relocated Lawrence Road
at the intersection of both Lawrence Road and Baldwin Road with
St. Mary's Road.
Following staff work and contacts with the North Carolina
Department of Transportation and finally a meeting involving Mary
Willis, myself, Stephen Roberts, the property owner's son, Steve
Yuhasz, the property owner's surveyor and Don Dickerson, the
property owner's attorney, the "plan" contained in the resolution
of approval was developed. Under that plan, Baldwin Road will be
realigned and constructed to current NC DOT standards in any
instance where the subdivision is "developed" beyond Phase I .
Phase I will consist of 9 new lots and the existing large parcel
on St. Mary's Road. If the developer builds only Phase I, there
will only be 9 new lots accessing Baldwin Road. The impact on
the existing Baldwin Road would therefore be minimal. However,
if subsequent phases of Black Walnut Farm are developed, the
impact on Sunnyside and St. Mary's Road will be appreciably
greater. Therefore, the developer will have to realign Baldwin
Road once the election to develop Phase II of the subdivision is
made. Dedication of the realigned Baldwin Road and its
construction will occur at the time Phase III of the subdivision
is developed.
With respect to the realignment of Baldwin Road, the
resolution involves the actual dedication, at the time of final
plat approval of Phase III of the subdivision, of a right-of-way
along the western property line of Black Walnut Farm and the
Board of Commissioners
Page 2
February 16, 1995
reservation of land for a realignment of Baldwin Road that would
connect with a realigned Lawrence Road. If the developer is
successful in obtaining the necessary right-of-way for realigning
Lawrence Road south of St. Mary's Road and putting together
whatever else it takes to accomplish this realignment, the
developer would have the option of dedicating the reserved right-
of-way for Baldwin Road to accomplish this realignment. The
County would, in turn, following its normal procedures, release
the dedication along the western property line. The property
released from the dedication would revert to the then property
owner(s) of the property over which the right-of-way travels .
Finally on this point, the County staff will work with the North
Carolina Department of Transportation, the developer and whomever
else, to aid in a realignment of Baldwin Road to accomplish
connection with the realigned Lawrence Road.
It is my view that the owner of the property will accept the
conditions of approval contained in the recommended resolution.
What turned the tide on this was the phasing plan which will
allow time for resolution of the Baldwin Road issue. Having said
that, it is possible that Stephen Roberts, on behalf of his
family, may still urge the Commissioners to approve the entire
subdivision without requiring realignment of Baldwin Road. If
that happens, it will be because of his view that he should not
be required to do something even if he is willing to do it to
accomplish the realignment of Baldwin Road. The response to that
during our negotiations was that the realignment of Baldwin Road
addresses two important County Subdivision Regulation concerns:
( 1) transportation impacts of the subdivision on Baldwin Road at
its intersection with St. Mary's Road and close to its
intersection with Lawrence Road; (2) impact of the use of the
existing Baldwin Road on the historic structure Sunnyside and
that the developer's offered solution to those concerns was being
accepted by Orange County. As a final note, the solution
proposed in the resolution is one, that is in my opinion,
authorized by the Subdivision Regulations to address the two
significant impacts resulting from this subdivision.
Very truly yours,
COLEMAN, GLEDHILL & HARGRAVE, P.C.
G E. Gledhill
GEG/lsg
xc: Marvin Collins
John M. Link, Jr.
Mary Willis
18g\home3\board.1tr
• �V
-2-
( 2) After survey l�Steven Yuhasz expressed great doubt about
the accuracy of his earlier boundary-dispute -resolving survey
paid for by me through my son and stating that he knew it hit
the river somewhere but did not know where I stated in rebuttal
that Mr . Yuhasz did not express any uncertainty about where my
line is when he accepted my money for doing the work . It is
only since he became the Black Walnut surveyor that he tries
to disown his own previously paid work .
( 3) I stated during rebuttal "that some land was stolen from
me while I was still away in the service" and that I wanted that
land returned before Black Walnut Subdivision got underway .
t
I request that you deny Black Walnut until , in the absence
of TAC approval, it meetSthe approval of its immediate neighbors .
Thanking you for your courtesy , I remain ,
Sincerely ,
,�; 4� ws� �"-V,—
Stewart Barbour
My letter of 1/17/95 with attachments and notes are incorporated
by reference .