Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda - 11-05-2013 - 6bORANGE COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS ACTION AGENDA ITEM ABSTRACT Meeting Date: November 5, 2013 Action Agenda Item No. 6 -b SUBJECT: Zoning Atlas Amendment — Keizer Rezoning of Two Parcels Totaling 16.1 Acres — Public Hearing Closure and Action (No Additional Comments Acceoted) DEPARTMENT: Planning and Inspections ATTACHMENTS: 1. Vicinity Map 2. September 9, 2013 Quarterly Public Hearing Legal Advertisement 3. Ordinance Approving Rezoning Petition 4. Ordinance Denying Rezoning Petition 5. Resolution Concerning Statement of Consistency with Comprehensive Plan 6. Resolution Concerning Statement of Inconsistency with Comprehensive Plan 7. Excerpt of Draft September 9, 2013 Quarterly Public Hearing Minutes 8. Excerpt of Draft October 2, 2013 Planning Board Minutes INFORMATIONAL /EDUCATIONAL ITEM(S): 9. Comprehensive Plan Land Use Matrix, Zoning District Chart, and Future Land Use Map PUBLIC HEARING: (Y /N) Yes INFORMATION CONTACT: Michael D. Harvey, Planner III, (919) 245 -2597 Craig Benedict, Director, (919) 245 -2592 PURPOSE: To receive the Planning Board recommendation, close the public hearing, and make a decision on an owner - initiated Zoning Atlas Amendment to rezone 2 parcels, 16.1 acres in area, (PINs 9844 -87 -7368 and 9844 -86 -7573) from Rural Residential (R -1) to Light Industrial (1 -1) in accordance with the provisions of the Unified Development Ordinance (UDO). As a reminder, the reconvening of this hearing is solely to receive the Planning Board recommendation and any additional written evidence submitted since the September 9, 2013 Quarterly Public Hearing. This hearing is not intended to solicit additional input from the public or the applicant. While the BOCC may ask staff questions related to the review of a given item, comments from the public shall not be solicited. BACKGROUND: This item was presented at the September 9, 2013 Quarterly Public Hearing. The applicants have made an offer to purchase the properties in an effort to expand their existing non - residential operation located at 3604 Southern Drive (PIN 9844 -86- 5155). The I applicants believe the request represents a logical extension of the existing 1 -1 zoning district and will allow for the expansion of an existing industrial operation consistent with the various policies of the adopted 2030 Comprehensive Plan. During the hearing the following questions were asked: 1. A BOCC member asked staff to clarify the intent and purpose of the Commercial Industrial Transition Activity Node (hereafter `the Node'). Staff Comment: The Orange County 2030 Comprehensive Plan defines the Node as follows: Land near major transportation routes that could be provided with public water and wastewater services and is appropriate for retail and other commercial uses; manufacturing and other industrial uses, office and limited (not to exceed 25% of any Node) higher density residential uses. 2. A BOCC member asked staff to explain why there was residentially zoned property within the Node. There was concern over the potential impact of the rezoning on the continued use of these properties to support residential land uses. Staff Comment: The aforementioned definition of the Node indicates `higher intensity residential uses' are acceptable for `limited' development in the area. As a result there is, and will continue to be, general use residential zoning designations throughout the Node. Underlying zoning was not changed with the establishment of the Node (i.e. up- zoning) and assumes as development conditions are favorable to allowing additional non- residential development, properties could be rezoned appropriately. While staff understands the concern, the UDO contains development standards designed to offset potential impacts (i.e. setbacks, land use buffers, performance standards, etc.). It should be noted, in accordance with Section 5.2.1 Table of Permitted Uses of the UDO, single - family residences are a permitted use of property within the following non- residential general use zoning districts: a. Local Commercial (LC -1) b. Neighborhood Commercial (NC -2) c. Community Commercial (CC -3) d. Existing Commercial (EC -5) e. Economic Development Eno Lower Intensity (EDE -1) f. Economic Development Hillsborough Limited Office with Residential (EDH -3) Additionally the Office Institutional (0/1), Economic Development Buckhorn Lower Intensity (EDB -1), EDE -1, and EDH -3 allow for the development of multi - family residential uses. Attachment 9 contains the Comprehensive Plan Land Use and Zoning Matrix denoting the various appropriate general use zoning districts for each land use classification and an educational chart providing additional information on the various general use zoning districts. 3. A BOCC member asked staff to clarify what land use buffer would be required on the 2 parcels if the properties were rezoned and developed for industrial use. t Staff Comment: Section 6.8.6 of the UDO provides for a variable width buffer based on the zoning of adjacent property. The typical land use buffer of an 1 -1 zoned property located adjacent to an R -1 zoned property is 100 feet. 4. A BOCC member asked if the expansion of the existing sheet metal fabrication operation at 3604 Southern Drive would negatively impact adjacent properties. Staff Comment: Staff did not believe the proposed expansion would create any negative impacts but could not offer any definitive comment without the submission of a formal site plan. Staff reminded the Board the decision to approve the request would be based on the appropriateness of the application, and its compliance with the Comprehensive Plan, and not on the possible expansion referenced within the Keizer's application. The property, if rezoned, could be developed to support any use detailed for the 1 -1 zoning district within Section 5.2.1 Table of Permitted Uses of the UDO. Agenda materials from the September 9, 2013 Quarterly Public Hearing can be viewed at- http://orangecountync.gov/occlerks/1 30909. pdf. Planning Director's Recommendation: The Planning Director recommends approval of the request finding that: 1. The application is complete in accordance with the requirements of Section 2.8 of the UDO. 2. The property is of sufficient size to be rezoned to 1 -1. 3. The rezoning is consistent with the Orange County 2030 Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map, the Growth Management System, and the adopted Efland- Mebane Small Area Plan. Planning Board Recommendation: At its October 2, 2013 regular meeting, the Board voted unanimously to recommend approval of the rezoning request consistent with the staff recommendation. Agenda materials from the October 2, 2013 Planning Board meeting can be viewed at: http: / /orangecountync.gov /planning/ documents /Oct20l3PBPacket- web.pdf. Please refer to Attachment 3 for the ordinance amending the zoning atlas and Attachment 5 for the resolution concerning statement of consistency indicating the proposed atlas amendment is consistent with the adopted 2030 Comprehensive Plan. Procedural Information: In accordance with Section 2.8.8 of the UDO, any evidence not presented at the public hearing must be submitted in writing prior to the Planning Board's recommendation. Additional oral evidence may be considered by the Planning Board only if it is for the purpose of presenting information also submitted in writing. The public hearing is held open to a date certain for the purpose of the BOCC receiving the Planning Board's recommendation and any submitted written comments. FINANCIAL IMPACT: Consideration and approval of this request will not create the need for additional funding for the provision of County services. Expenditures associated with the processing of this application, namely the legal advertisement and notification letters /postcards, were paid through application filing fees. Review of the application by staff was covered under existing Department budgetary outlays. M RECOMMENDATION(S): The Interim Manager recommends the Board: 1. Receive the Planning Board's recommendation; 2. Close the public hearing; and 3. Decide accordingly and /or adopt: a. Attachment 3 Ordinance Amending the Zoning Atlas b. Attachment 5 Resolution Concerning Statement of Consistency authorizing the zoning atlas amendments as detailed herein. I__ ' Township Boundary or City Limits ETJ 2010 Images RGB Red: Band_1 Green:Band_2 - Blue: Band_3 O.a „n N 1 inch = 250 feet °' >n w Orange County Planning and Inspections Department 5/31/2013 u Attachment 2 NOTICE OF JOINT PUBLIC HEARING ORANGE COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS ORANGE COUNTY PLANNING BOARD A joint public hearing will be held at the Department of Social Services, Hillsborough Commons, 113 Mayo St., Hillsborough, North Carolina, on Monday, September 9, 2013 at 7:00 PM for the purpose of giving all interested citizens an opportunity to speak for or against the following items- 1 . Zoning Atlas Amendment: In accordance with the provisions of Section 2.8 Zoning Atlas and Unified Development Ordinance Amendments of the Unified Development Ordinance (UDO), Ms. Maria Keizer and Mr. Ronald Keizer have submitted a request to rezone a 2.67 acre parcel of property located at 3604 Southern Drive (PIN 9844 -86 -5155) FROM: Rural Residential (R -1) and Light Industrial (1 -1) TO: Light Industrial (1 -1) The parcel is currently utilized to support USA Dutch Incorporated, a sheet metal fabrication operation that has operated since 1987. Ms. Keizer owns the property and her son, Ronald Keizer, operates the existing commercial operation. According to the application, the applicants are interested in extending the existing industrial zoning over the entire property in order to ensure parking, storage spaces, access roads, land use buffers, and septic systems are properly zoned in support of the existing industrial operation. The property subject to this petition is located within the Commercial Industrial Transition Activity Node as denoted on the Future Land Use Map of the Comprehensive Plan and the Urban Designated Area as denoted on the Growth Management System Map. Purpose: To review the item and receive public comment on the proposed amendment. 2. Zoning Atlas Amendment: In accordance with the provisions of Section 2.8 Zoning Atlas and Unified Development Ordinance Amendments of the Unified Development Ordinance (UDO), Ms. Maria Keizer and Mr. Ronald Keizer have submitted a request to rezone 2 parcels of property, totaling approximately 16 acres in land area: FROM: Rural Residential (R -1) TO: Light Industrial (1 -1) The parcels, further identified utilizing Orange County Parcel Identification Numbers (PIN) 9844 -86 -7573 and 9844 -87 -7368, are undeveloped and without 7 an assigned street address. These parcels are east and south, respectively, of the USA Dutch property located at 3604 Southern Drive. According to the application, USA Dutch has an offer to purchase both properties for the purpose of expanding their existing sheet metal fabrication operation. As a result, they would like to extend the 1 -1 zoning designation in support of the proposed expansion. The properties subject to this petition are located within the Commercial Industrial Transition Activity Node as denoted on the Future Land Use Map of the Comprehensive Plan and the Urban Designated Area as denoted on the Growth Management System Map. Purpose: To review the item and receive public comment on the proposed amendment. 3. Unified Development Ordinance (UDO) Text Amendment: In accordance with the provisions of Section 2.8 Zoning Atlas and Unified Development Ordinance Amendments of the Unified Development Ordinance, the Planning Director has initiated an amendment to the text of the Unified Development Ordinance (UDO). The proposal seeks to add a new Section 2.24 entitled Governmental Uses, renumber existing Section 2.24 and subsequent sections accordingly, and modify the `government' land use category within Section 5.2.2 Table of Permitted Uses — Economic Development District to add the term `uses'. References to subsequent renumbered sections occur throughout the UDO and will be updated including amendments to Section(s) 2.22.5, 2.23.9, 9.5.4, 9.6.6, 9.7.2, and 9.8.5. The purpose of the amendments is to change the application review process to require a neighborhood information meeting as part of the site plan review process for governmental uses. Examples of governmental uses include rescue squads, fire stations, solid waste convenience centers, governmental office buildings, and military installations. Purpose: To review the item and receive public comment on the proposed amendment. 4. Eno Economic Development District Access Management Plan: As an implementation measure of the Eno Economic Development District (EDD) Area Small Area Plan, an access management plan has been developed for the Eno EDD. An access management plan is intended to provide better transportation systems and capacities as development proceeds in an area. Formally adopted transportation access plans are necessary to procure federal and state funding for projects and to require developer action and contribution in providing transportation infrastructure consistent with a master plan. The proposed access management study area involves approximately 980 acres of land in the vicinity of US Highway 70 and Old Highway 10 (near Durham County). The draft Access Management Plan is available on the Orange County Planning Department website at: http: / /orangecountync.gov /planning /SpecialProiects.asp Purpose: To review the item and receive public comment on the Draft Eno Economic Development District Access Management Plan. PUBLIC INFORMATION MEETING /OPEN HOUSE for this proposal In an effort to better inform interested persons in an informal setting, a Public Information Meeting /Open House will be held on September 4, 2013 from 4 :30 — 6 :30 pm at the Shared Visions Retreat Center (historic Murphey School), 3717 Murphey School Rd., Durham, NC. 5. Town of Hillsborough /Orange County Central Orange Coordinated Area Land Use Plan: Consistent with the Hillsborough- Orange Interlocal Land Management Agreement (December 2009), the Town of Hillsborough adopted a Future Land Use Plan in March 2013 for its planning jurisdiction and some additional areas of County jurisdiction. These additional areas of County jurisdiction are located within the Town's Urban Service Boundary for its public water and /or sewer services and are generally located around the Town's fringe. Orange County staff, Board of County Commissioners, and the public provided input throughout the Town's planning process. This public hearing is being held by Orange County on future land uses proposed for the areas of County jurisdiction located within the Town's Urban Service Boundary. This is the next step towards completion of a joint Town of Hillsborough /Orange County Central Orange Coordinated Area Land Use Plan. Additional information including a link to the draft Land Use Plan is available on the Orange County Planning Department website at: http: / /www.co. orange. nc. us / planning/ OrangeCountyTownofHillsboroughJointPlanning .asp. Purpose: To receive public comment and receive direction from the Board of Commissioners as to subsequent steps towards a joint Town of Hillsborough /Orange County Central Orange Coordinated Area Land Use Plan. Substantial changes in items presented at the public hearing may be made following the receipt of comments made at the public hearing. Accommodations for individuals with physical disabilities can be provided if the request is made to the Planning Director at least 48 hours prior to the Public Hearing by calling the one of the phone numbers 9 below. The full text of the public hearing items may be obtained no later than August 30, 2013 at the County website www.co.orange.nc.us at the Meeting Agendas link. Questions regarding the proposals may be directed to the Orange County Planning Department located on the second floor of the County Office Building at 131 West Margaret Lane, Suite 201, Hillsborough, North Carolina. Office hours are from 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Monday through Friday. You may also call (919) 245 -2575 or 245 -2585 and you will be directed to a staff member who will answer your questions. PUBLISH: The Herald Sun News of Orange August 28, 2013 August 28, 2013 September 4, 2013 September 4, 2013 Ordinance #.-2013-042 ATTACHMENT 3 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ORANGE COUNTY ZONING ATLAS 10 WHEREAS, Orange County has received and processed a petition seeking to amend the Orange County Zoning Atlas, as established in Section 1.2 of the Orange County Unified Development Ordinance (UDO), and WHEREAS, This petition, submitted by Ms. Maria Keizer and Mr. Ronald Keizer, seeks to rezone 2 parcels of property totaling approximately 16.1 acres located east and south of 3604 Southern Drive further identified utilizing Orange County Parcel Identification Number (PIN) 9844 -87 -7368 and 9844 -86 -7573 to Light Industrial (1 -1), and WHEREAS, the properties to be rezoned are identified further as follows: Being all of Lots Number One (1) and Two (2) containing a total of 16.1 acres more or less and shown on a plat entitled "Final Plat — Re- division of Lot 1, First South Bank, INC" dated May 6, 1985 as drawn by K. Gary Simmons, RL, of Simmons Engineering & Surveying INC. and recorded in the Office of the Register of Deeds for Orange County, NC in Plat Book 74 Page 168. WHEREAS, the requirements of Section 2.8 of the Unified Development Ordinance (UDO) have been deemed complete, and WHEREAS, pursuant to Sections 1.1.5 and 1.1.7 of the UDO and to Section 153A -341 of the North Carolina General Statutes, the Board finds that the rezoning will carry out the intent and purpose of the adopted 2030 Comprehensive Plan or part thereof including, but not limited to, the following: a. The Future Land Use Map. b. Principle 7: Promotion of Economic Prosperity and Diversity c. Economic Development (ED) Overarching Goal: Viable and sustainable economic development that contributes to both property and sales tax revenues, and enhances high - quality employment opportunities for County residents. d. Land Use Overarching Goal: Coordination of the amount, location, pattern and designation of future land uses, with availability of County services and facilities sufficient to meet the needs of Orange County's population and economy consistent with other Comprehensive Plan element goals and objectives. e. Objective LU -1.1: Coordinate the location of higher intensity / high density residential and non - residential development with existing or planned locations of public transportation, commercial and community services, and adequate supporting infrastructure (i.e., water and sewer, high -speed internet access, streets, and sidewalks), while avoiding areas with protected natural and cultural resources. This could be achieved by increasing allowable densities and creating new mixed -use zoning districts where adequate public services are available. and 11 WHEREAS, the Board has found the proposed zoning atlas amendments to be reasonably necessary to promote the public health, safety, and general welfare. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Commissioners of Orange County that the Orange County Zoning Atlas is hereby amended to rezone the properties as described herein to Light Industrial (1 -1). BE IT FURTHER ORDAINED THAT this ordinance be placed in the book of published ordinances and that this ordinance is effective upon its adoption. Upon motion of Commissioner , seconded by Commissioner , the foregoing ordinance was adopted this day of , 2013. I, Donna S. Baker, Clerk to the Board of Commissioners for Orange County, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing is a true copy of so much of the proceedings of said Board at a meeting held on , 2013 as relates in any way to the adoption of the foregoing and that said proceedings are recorded in the minutes of the said Board. WITNESS my hand and the seal of said County, this day of K191 SEAL Clerk to the Board of Commissioners f Ordinance #.-2013-043 ATTACHMENT 4 AN ORDINANCE DENYING AN AMENDMENT TO THE ORANGE COUNTY ZONING ATLAS 12 WHEREAS, Orange County has received and processed a petition seeking to amend the Orange County Zoning Atlas, as established in Section 1.2 of the Orange County Unified Development Ordinance (UDO), and WHEREAS, This petition, submitted by Ms. Maria Keizer and Mr. Ronald Keizer, seeks to rezone 2 parcels of property totaling approximately 16.1 acres located east and south of 3604 Southern Drive further identified utilizing Orange County Parcel Identification Number (PIN) 9844 -87 -7368 and 9844 -86 -7573 to Light Industrial (1 -1), and WHEREAS, the properties to be rezoned are identified further as follows: Being all of Lots Number One (1) and Two (2) containing a total of 16.1 acres more or less and shown on a plat entitled "Final Plat — Re- division of Lot 1, First South Bank, INC" dated May 6, 1985 as drawn by K. Gary Simmons, RL, of Simmons Engineering & Surveying INC. and recorded in the Office of the Register of Deeds for Orange County, NC in Plat Book 74 Page 168. WHEREAS, the requirements of Section 2.8 of the Unified Development Ordinance (UDO) have been deemed complete, and WHEREAS, pursuant to Sections 1.1.5 and 1.1.7 of the UDO and to Section 153A -341 of the North Carolina General Statutes, the Board finds that the rezoning will not carry out the intent and purpose of the adopted 2030 Comprehensive Plan or part thereof including, and WHEREAS, the Board has found the proposed zoning atlas amendment is not reasonably necessary to promote the public health, safety, and general welfare. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Commissioners of Orange County that the rezoning request, as referenced herein, is denied BE IT FURTHER ORDAINED THAT this ordinance be placed in the book of published ordinances and that this ordinance is effective upon its adoption. Upon motion of Commissioner , seconded by Commissioner , the foregoing ordinance was adopted this day of , 2013. I, Donna S. Baker, Clerk to the Board of Commissioners for Orange County, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing is a true copy of so much of the proceedings of said Board at a meeting held on 13 , 2013 as relates in any way to the adoption of the foregoing and that said proceedings are recorded in the minutes of the said Board. WITNESS my hand and the seal of said County, this day of 2013. SEAL Clerk to the Board of Commissioners RES- 2013 -089 Attachment 5 RESOLUTION CONCERNING STATEMENT OF CONSISTENCY OF A PROPOSED ZONING ATLAS AMENDMENT WITH THE ADOPTED ORANGE COUNTY 2030 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 14 WHEREAS, Ms. Maria Keizer, an Orange County property owner, has initiated an amendment to the Orange County Zoning Atlas, as established in Section 1.2 of the Orange County Unified Development Ordinance (UDO), and WHEREAS, the rezoning petition seeks to rezone 2 parcels of property totaling approximately 16.1 acres located east and south of 3604 Southern Drive further identified utilizing Orange County Parcel Identification Number (PIN) 9844 -87 -7368 and 9844 -86 -7573 to Light Industrial (1 -1), and WHEREAS, pursuant to Sections 1.1.5, and 1.1.7 of the UDO and to Section 153A -341 of the North Carolina General Statutes, the Board finds sufficient documentation within the record denoting that the rezoning will carry out the intent and purpose of the adopted 2030 Comprehensive Plan, as amended, or part thereof including but not limited to, the following: a. The Future Land Use Map. b. Principle 7: Promotion of Economic Prosperity and Diversity c. Economic Development (ED) Overarching Goal: Viable and sustainable economic development that contributes to both property and sales tax revenues, and enhances high - quality employment opportunities for County residents. d. Land Use Overarching Goal: Coordination of the amount, location, pattern and designation of future land uses, with availability of County services and facilities sufficient to meet the needs of Orange County's population and economy consistent with other Comprehensive Plan element goals and objectives. e. Objective LU -1.1: Coordinate the location of higher intensity / high density residential and non - residential development with existing or planned locations of public transportation, commercial and community services, and adequate supporting infrastructure (i.e., water and sewer, high -speed intereet access, streets, and sidewalks), while avoiding areas with protected natural and cultural resources. This could be achieved by increasing allowable densities and creating new mixed -use zoning districts where adequate public services are available. and, WHEREAS, the Board has found the proposed zoning atlas amendments to be reasonable and in the public interest as it promotes public health, safety, and general welfare by furthering the goals and purposes of the 2030 Comprehensive Plan or part thereof. BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Commissioners of Orange County that the proposed zoning atlas amendment, as described herein, has been deemed to be consistent with the goals and policies of the adopted Orange County 2030 Comprehensive Plan and the BOCC hereby adopts this statement of consistency signifying same. 15 Upon motion of Commissioner , seconded by Commissioner , the foregoing ordinance was adopted this day of , 2013. I, Donna S. Baker, Clerk to the Board of Commissioners for Orange County, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing is a true copy of so much of the proceedings of said Board at a meeting held on , 2013 as relates in any way to the adoption of the foregoing and that said proceedings are recorded in the minutes of the said Board. WITNESS my hand and the seal of said County, this day of 2013. SEAL Clerk to the Board of Commissioners f RES- 2013 -090 Attachment 6 RESOLUTION CONCERNING STATEMENT OF INCONSISTENCY OF A PROPOSED ZONING ATLAS AMENDMENT WITH THE ADOPTED ORANGE COUNTY 2030 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 16 WHEREAS, Ms. Maria Keizer, an Orange County property owner, has initiated an amendment to the Orange County Zoning Atlas, as established in Section 1.2 of the Orange County Unified Development Ordinance (UDO), and WHEREAS, the rezoning petition seeks to rezone 2 parcels of property totaling approximately 16.1 acres located east and south of 3604 Southern Drive further identified utilizing Orange County Parcel Identification Number (PIN) 9844 -87 -7368 and 9844 -86 -7573 to Light Industrial (1 -1), and WHEREAS, pursuant to Sections 1.1.5, and 1.1.7 of the UDO and to Section 153A -341 of the North Carolina General Statutes, the Board finds there is insufficient documentation within the record denoting that the rezoning will carry out the intent and purpose of the adopted 2030 Comprehensive Plan, as amended, or part thereof, and, WHEREAS, the Board has found the proposed zoning atlas amendment is not in the public interest as it does not promote the public health, safety, and general welfare. BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Commissioners of Orange County that the proposed zoning atlas amendment, as described herein, has been deemed to be inconsistent with the goals and policies of the adopted Orange County 2030 Comprehensive Plan and the BOCC hereby adopts this statement of consistency signifying same. Upon motion of Commissioner , seconded by Commissioner , the foregoing ordinance was adopted this day of , 2013. I, Donna S. Baker, Clerk to the Board of Commissioners for Orange County, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing is a true copy of so much of the proceedings of said Board at a meeting held on , 2013 as relates in any way to the adoption of the foregoing and that said proceedings are recorded in the minutes of the said Board. WITNESS my hand and the seal of said County, this day of K191 SEAL Clerk to the Board of Commissioners 17 Attachment 7 Excerpt of draft minutes 1 DRAFT MINUTES 2 ORANGE COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS 3 ORANGE COUNTY PLANNING BOARD 4 QUARTERLY PUBLIC HEARING 5 September 9, 2013 6 7:00 P.M. 7 8 The Orange County Board of Commissioners and the Orange County Planning Board 9 met for a Quarterly Public Hearing on Monday, September 9, 2013 at 7:00 p.m. at the DSS 10 Offices, Hillsborough Commons, Hillsborough, N.C. 11 12 COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENT: Chair Barry Jacobs and Commissioners mark 13 Dorosin, Alice M. Gordon, Earl McKee Bernadette Pelissier, Renee Price and Penny Rich 14 COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ABSENT: 15 COUNTY ATTORNEY PRESENT: James Bryan (Staff Attorney) 16 COUNTY STAFF PRESENT: County Manager Frank Clifton and Deputy Clerk to the Board 17 David Hunt (All other staff members will be identified appropriately below) 18 PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS PRESENT: Chair Pete Hallenbeck, and Planning Board 19 members, Maxecine Mitchell, Johnny Randall, Lisa Stuckey, Stephanie O'Rouke, Paul Guthrie, 20 and Herman Staats 21 PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS ABSENT: Tony Blake, Andrea Rohrbacher, Rachel Phelps 22 Hawkins, James Lea and H.T. "Buddy" Hartley 23 24 A. OPENING REMARKS FROM THE CHAIR 25 Chair Jacobs and Planning Board Chair Pete Hallenbeck 26 27 B. PUBLIC CHARGE 28 The Chair dispensed with the reading of the public charge. 29 30 Chair Jacobs called the meeting to order. 31 Chair Jacobs reviewed the following handouts at the table: 32 - PowerPoint for item C1 — Zoning Atlas Amendment 33 - White sheet for item C1 — Zoning Atlas Amendment 34 - Map for C1 and C2 - Zoning Atlas Amendment — requested by Commissioner Rich 35 - PowerPoint for item C2 — Zoning Atlas Amendment 36 - PowerPoint for item C4 - Eno Economic Development District Access Management 37 Plan 38 - PowerPoint for item C5 — Hillsborough /Orange County Central Orange Coordinated 39 Area Land Use Plan 40 - Green PowerPoint for item E1 — Agricultural Support Enterprises 41 42 43 C. PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS !El! 45 Chair Jacobs called the public hearing to order. He noted that Pete Hallenbeck would 46 preside over the meeting. 47 48 The following Planning Board members were present: Chair Pete Hallenbeck, Maxecine 49 Mitchell, Lisa Stuckey, Stephanie O'Rouke, Paul Guthrie, and Herman Staats. 50 51 2. Zoning Atlas Amendment — To review a property owner - initiated amendment to the 52 Zoning Atlas to rezone 2 parcels of property, totaling approximately 16 acres in land area, from 53 Rural Residential (R -1) to Light Industrial (1 -1). tiu; 1 The parcels are undeveloped and without an assigned street address but are located east and 2 south of the USA Dutch property at 3604 Southern Drive. 3 4 Planning Board member Lisa Stuckey left at 7:43 pm. 5 Michael Harvey reviewed the following PowerPoint Slides: 6 7 ZONING ATLAS (MAP) AMENDMENT 8 BACKGROUND 9 PIN(S) — 9844 -87 -7368 and 9844 -86 -7573. 10 Size of Parcel(s) — Total is approximately 16 acres. 11 Future Land Use Element Map Designation — Commercial Industrial Transition Activity 12 Node 13 Growth Management System Designation -- Urban. 14 Existing Conditions — Properties are undeveloped with varying topography and 15 vegetation. 16 Access -- The smaller property has direct access onto Southern Drive. 17 REQUEST: 18 • Applicant (Keizer) owns adjacent metal fabrication business at 3604 Southern Drive. 19 • Applicant looking to expand existing operation. 20 Wishes to have both parcels rezoned to allow for expansion. 21 FUTURE LAND USE MAP: 22 COMMERCIAL /INDUSTRIAL TRANSITION: 23 Per approved Comprehensive Plan area `appropriate for retail and other commercial 24 uses and /or manufacturing and other industrial uses'. 25 County did not eliminate all residential zoning in the area when land use category 26 created /adopted so individuals could still make use of property. 27 Area is intended to support non - residential development including industrial (i.e. 28 manufacturing). 29 STAFF ASSESSMENT: 30 The application is complete. 31 The property is of sufficient size. 32 Rezoning consistent with the Orange County 2030 Comprehensive Plan, Growth 33 Management System Map, and adopted Efland Mebane Small Area Plan, 34 Represents logical extension of existing 1 -1 district. 35 Existing vegetation near interstate and around existing stream will have to be preserved. 36 The applicant will have to plant additional vegetation to satisfy land use buffer 37 requirement of 100 feet per Section 6.8.6 (F) of UDO. 38 Sheet metal fabrication is a permitted use of property in the 1 -1 zoning district. 39 Expansion would be reviewed /acted upon by staff with the submission of a site plan per 40 Section 2.5 of the UDO. 41 RECOMMENDATION: 42 1. Refer the matter to the Planning Board with a request that a recommendation be 43 returned to the Board of County Commissioners in time for the November 5, 2013 44 BOCC regular meeting. 45 2. Adjourn the public hearing until November 5, 2013 in order to receive and accept the 46 Planning Board's recommendation and any submitted written comments. im 19 1 Michael Harvey noted that the abstract includes a statement from the current property 2 owner, Daniel McDonald, who indicates that Ronald Keizer has an option on purchasing the 3 property. He said this is contingent on the re- zoning approval. 4 Michael Harvey said Ronald Keizer has been made aware of the buffer requirements for 5 this property. 6 Commissioner Price said she is pleased that a local business wants to expand. She 7 asked if the expansion would mean an increased intensity in the use, or if it would remain the 8 same. 9 Michael Harvey said the re- zoning needs to be acted on regardless of whether or not it is 10 consistent with the code. He said he believes there will be an expansion and amplification of 11 the existing use. He also believes the existing land use criteria and standards will mitigate any 12 impacts. He said he has not seen the site plan, so he is hesitant to give a definite answer. 13 Commissioner McKee said the last item simply aligned what was on the ground with 14 what is on paper. He said this item is placing before the Board the very thing that the County 15 has wanted, which is more job and business opportunities in Orange County. He said this 16 request is in an area where the land use has already been designated as appropriate. He said 17 there are still opportunities to ask questions and work out agreements as this moves forward. 18 He said he is in favor of this. 19 Chair Jacobs asked if there is water and sewer available. 20 Craig Benedict said there is no public water and sewer in the area. He said part of the 21 current design to flip the sewer flow will bring gravity sewer past this parcel. He said this would 22 happen in a year and a half to two years 23 Chair Jacobs asked if owners with a sewer line running in front of their property are 24 required to hook in. 25 Craig Benedict said the UDO gives distance requirements that do require owners to 26 connect on. 27 He said that Orange Alamance water systems has some facilities in this area, and work 28 is being done to insure that future development can handle both potable water and fire 29 suppression needs for these new industries. 30 Commissioner Rich asked if residents would be required to hook up to the sewer lines. 31 Craig Benedict said commercial owners, expansions to a business, or a new home built 32 within the designated distance will be required to hook up. 33 Commissioner Rich noted that part of the zoning change request was due to a need to 34 fix the septic system, and then the owner will be required to hook up to sewer in a couple of 35 years. 36 Craig Benedict said that if the owner fixes the septic, he will be allowed to remain with 37 the new or repaired system until it fails. 38 Frank Clifton said this is a project Steve Brantley has worked on with the owner. 39 Pete Hallenbeck asked if there were any comments from the Planning Board. 40 Pete Hallenbeck said he is pleased to hear about the option for a local supplier of 41 chassis. He is also please to hear about the potential water availability for fire suppression. 42 Chair Jacobs asked about the number of current and future employees. 43 Applicant Ronald Kaiser said he currently has 26 employees. He said business is 44 growing. He said there were 18 employees in 2009, and the company did $1.8 million in sales. 45 He said he expects to do $4.2 million in sales this year. He said the company set a goal of 46 being a 5 million dollar company. He said this goal has almost been met, and his desire is to 47 set a new goal that allows the company to keep up with its growing customers. 48 James Bryan, Staff Attorney, said this decision will be based on the reasonableness and 49 consistency with the land plan and the public benefit but not the benefits of this particular 50 business. 51 Chair Jacobs said he is excited about the potential for this expansion. He said he is 52 somewhat confused about the answer given about the requirement for sewer hookup. He said 53 he wanted to provide this answer to Ronald Keiser as part of his planning. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Craig Benedict said this is a timing issue. He said if the expansion happens at a later date when sewer is available, the owner can hook with the public sewer. He said Ronald Keiser can repair his existing septic. A motion was made by Commissioner McKee, seconded by Commissioner Price to: 1. Refer the matter to the Planning Board with a request that a recommendation be returned to the Board of County Commissioners in time for the November 5, 2013 BOCC regular meeting. 2. Adjourn the public hearing until November 5, 2013 in order to receive and accept the Planning Board's recommendation and any submitted written comments. VOTE: UNANIMOUS C 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 1 Attachment 8 Excerpt of Draft Planning Board Minutes DRAFT MINUTES ORANGE COUNTY PLANNING BOARD OCTOBER 2, 2013 REGULAR MEETING MEMBERS PRESENT: Peter Hallenbeck (Chair), Cheeks Township Representative; Lisa Stuckey, Chapel Hill Township Representative; Maxecine Mitchell, At -Large Bingham Township; Tony Blake, Bingham Township Representative; Herman Staats, At- Large, Cedar Grove Township; James Lea, Cedar Grove Township Representative; Andrea Rohrbacher, At -Large Chapel Hill Township; Paul Guthrie, At -Large Chapel Hill Township; MEMBERS ABSENT: Johnny Randall, At -Large Chapel Hill Township; Buddy Hartley, Little River Township Representative; Stephanie O'Rourke, Eno Township Representative; Vacant- Hillsborough Township Representative; STAFF PRESENT: Craig Benedict, Planning Director; Perdita Holtz, Special Projects Coordinator; Michael Harvey, Current Planning Supervisor; Tom Altieri, Comprehensive Planning Supervisor; Ashley Moncado, Special Projects Planner; Abigaile Pittman, Transportation /Land Use Planner; Tina Love, Administrative Assistant II HANDOUTS: Petition regarding Eno Area Access Management Plan; Town of Hillsborough /Orange County Coordinated Area Land Use Plan Flowchart Agenda Item 8: Zoning Atlas Amendment — To make a recommendation to the BOCC on a property owner - initiated amendment to the Zoning Atlas to rezone 2 parcels of property, totaling approximately 16 acres in land area, from Rural Residential (R -1) and Light Industrial (1 -1) to Light Industrial (1 -1). The parcels are undeveloped and without an assigned street address but are located east and south of the USA Dutch property at 3604 Southern Drive. This item was heard at the September 9, 2013 quarterly public hearing. Presenter: Michael Harvey, Current Planning Supervisor Michael Harvey: (Reviewed abstract). Maxecine Mitchell: Are they on septic there? Michael Harvey: They're still on septic, however, sewer and utilities ought to be available in the near future. If it is available they obviously could tie in if they go through the appropriate process. Tony Blake: They have not purchased this property yet? Michael Harvey: No, and as we stipulated at the public hearing, they have an offer to purchase and have signed a contract to purchase contingent upon this rezoning going through. Lisa Stuckey: Is this is the rural buffer? 21 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 1 Michael Harvey: No. This is rural residential zoning. Maxecine Mitchell: Will this company's future expansion create more job opportunities and is this something we should take into consideration for this proposal? Michael Harvey: It shouldn't be part of the consideration but Mr. Kizer did make comment at the public hearing that additional jobs would be created. Paul Guthrie: Will that sewer system that is going through there have the capacity to handle that operation or will there have to be pre- treatment? Craig Benedict: The system is in the design stages and it will take into consideration the land uses and the water and sewer demand enough to accommodate the change of land uses from what is there now to non - residential. From a demand standpoint, yes we have it covered. We will examine what type of sewer flow they have and sometimes pretreatment is necessary in some manufacturing operations. Maxecine Mitchell: You said that a certain percentage of the R1 could be turned into 11. Michael Harvey: The percentage figure I believe you are referring to was the allowable percentage of impervious surface area on a given lot. The node, as currently defined, allows for minimal high intense residential development in the area. Maxecine Mitchell: If we rezone this will it leave room for more requests? Michael Harvey: Yes. Approval of this request will not limit or hinder future requests from being submitted or heard. MOTION made by Tony Blake to approve attachments 3 and 4 to rezone two parcels totaling 16.1 acres. Seconded by Lisa Stuckey. VOTE: Unanimous 2 22 Attachment 9 ON. Appendix g Land Use and Zoning Matrix c ra4,W Cody Ca mprahzfu ie, P Page F-3 23 7".3 -d1 11N , ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ nu (Ild ♦ e iy bI, oJ• v 0 q ^ bQ q H to N o SV P4 + ad -mum `Ilia:1i �+ v ti L Z -] • 1/0 • • t7 'a 9-;-) . N 0 •0 •p Z JN H L I XI c � £ I -l[ `K-ll `5-21 ♦ �? fill `£-ll Z-11 . • • � 1-21 • • • 11V Q, fill • s� o o o. v �y o 41 •� �v y s+ vMyi z' 1:1 i•+ y .�." p � � p �y, � V `c Q' d U w ai Pry a U U o .� o N O sd v �; O c. U H v` w H P4 a P4 by �; O P4 4 u P4 -1 O P4 i, a 1101jIN111:.1 ] 11:31111 Allpa ap c ra4,W Cody Ca mprahzfu ie, P Page F-3 23 /A Informational table denoting purpose, minimum lot area, and locational allowances of general use zoning districts District Section3.3 of the UDO - Purpose Statements for Section 3.3 of the Allowable Land Use `Residential Districts' UDO — Minimum Lot Categories for districts — Size per Comprehensive Plan (Refer to Attachment 2) Rural Buffer ... provide locations for rural residential 87,120 square feet (2 Rural Buffer (RB) developments and agricultural, silvicultural or acres) horticultural uses which serve to buffer or separate more intensively planned and /or developed portions of Orange County. Development within the Rural Buffer (RB) District is at very low densities (the minimum lot size per dwelling unit is two acres) and relies on individual wells and ground absorption systems for domestic water supply and sewage disposal, respectively. Agricultural ... assist in the preservation of land suitable, as a 40,000 square feet Agricultural Residential Residential result of location, existing farming operations, soils (.92 acres) (AR) and topography, for agricultural, silvicultural or horticultural uses and to protect such uses from the adverse effects of incompatible land uses. Rural ... provide locations for rural non -farm residential 40,000 square feet Rural Residential Residential development, at very low intensities, in areas (.92 acres) 10 and /or 20 Year Transition (R -1) where the short and long -term solutions to domestic water supply and sewage disposal shall be individual wells and ground absorption system. Low ... provide locations for low intensity residential 20,000 square feet 10 and /or 20 Year Transition Intensity development and supporting recreational, (.45 acres) Residential community service and educational uses in areas (R -2) where urban services are available or are to be provided as part of the development process. Medium ... provide locations for moderate intensity 15,000 square feet 10 and /or 20 Year Transition Intensity residential development and supporting (.34 acres) Residential recreational, community service and educational (R -3) uses in areas where urban services are available or are to be provided as part of the development process. Medium ... provide locations for moderate intensity 10,000 square feet 10 and /or 20 Year Transition Intensity residential development and supporting (.22 acres) Residential recreational, community service and educational (R -4) uses in areas where urban services are available or are to be provided as part of the development process. 25 District Section3.3 of the UDO - Purpose Statements Section 3.3 of the Allowable Land Use for `Residential Districts' UDO — Minimum Lot Categories for districts — Size per Comprehensive Plan (Refer to Attachment 2) High Intensity ... provide locations for high intensity residential 7,500 square feet (.17 10 and /or 20 Year Residential development and supporting recreational acres) Transition (R -5) community, service, or educational uses in areas where the full range urban services are available. It is further intended that these districts be used to promote economically mixed housing developments and to contribute to the provision of a range of housing types for lower income households. High Intensity ... provide locations for high intensity residential 5,000 square feet (.11 10 and /or 20 Year Residential development and supporting recreational acres) Transition (R -8) community, service, or educational uses in areas where the full range urban services are available. It is further intended that these districts be used to promote economically mixed housing developments and to contribute to the provision of a range of housing types for lower income households. High Intensity ... provide locations for high intensity residential 3,000 square feet (.06 10 and /or 20 Year Residential development and supporting recreational acres) Transition (R -13) community, service, or educational uses in areas where the full range urban services are available. It is further intended that these districts be used to promote economically mixed housing developments and to contribute to the provision of a range of housing types for lower income households. M District Section3.4 of the UDO - Purpose Statements Section 3.4 of the Allowable Land Use for `Commercial Districts' UDO — Minimum Lot Categories for districts — Size per Comprehensive Plan (Refer to Attachment 2) Local ... provide appropriately located and sized sites No specific minimum - Commercial Transition Commercial for limited commercial uses designed to serve a lot size shall be Activity Node (LC -1) population at the neighborhood and rural level appropriate to method Commercial - Industrial with convenience goods and personal services. of water supply and Transition Activity Node Performance standards will be used to insure the sewage disposal and absence of adverse impacts beyond the applicable ratio Rural Neighborhood Activity immediate space occupied by the building. standards (i.e. floor Node ** NOTE — residential is allowed in this district as area ratio, open space, etc.) Rural Industrial Activity a permitted use per Section 5.2 of the UDO. Node Neighborhood ... provide appropriately located and sized sites 2,000 square feet - lot Commercial Transition Commercial for limited commercial uses designed to serve a size shall be Activity Node (NC -2) population at the neighborhood and rural level appropriate to method Commercial - Industrial with convenience goods and personal services. of water supply and Transition Activity Node Performance standards will be used to insure the sewage disposal and absence of adverse impacts beyond the lot applicable ratio Rural Neighborhood Activity boundaries of the use. standards (i.e. floor Node ** NOTE — residential is allowed in this district as area ratio, open space, etc.) Rural Industrial Activity a permitted use per Section 5.2 of the UDO. Node Community ... provide suitably located and sized sites for 2,000 square feet - lot Commercial Transition Commercial commercial, office and service uses designed to size shall be Activity Node (CC -3) serve a county -level market area. Performance appropriate to method Commercial - Industrial standards will be used to insure the absence of of water supply and Transition Activity Node adverse impacts beyond the zoning district sewage disposal and boundaries of the use. applicable ratio ** NOTE — residential is allowed in this district as standards (i.e. floor a permitted use per Section 5.2 of the UDO. area ratio, open space, etc.) General ... provide suitable situated and sized sites that 40,000 square feet - lot Commercial Transition Commercial allow a broad range of commercial, office and size shall be Activity Node (GC -4) service uses. Performance standards will be used appropriate to method Commercial - Industrial to insure the absence of adverse impacts beyond of water supply and Transition Activity Node the zoning district boundary. sewage disposal and applicable ratio standards (i.e. floor area ratio, open space, etc.) Existing ... provide a district to be used only during the 40,000 square feet Not specifically tied to a Commercial application of zoning to previously unzoned Land Use Category — (EC -5 townships to accommodate existing commercial allowed wherever existing uses or in zoned townships to previously zoned commercial uses were commercial property which is not located in areas located during imposition of designated as Activity Nodes by the adopted zoning Comprehensive Plan. ** NOTE — residential is allowed in this district as a permitted use per Section 5.2 of the UDO. 27 District Section3.4 of the UDO - Purpose Statements for `Commercial Districts' Section 3.4 of the UDO — Minimum Lot Size Allowable Land Use Categories for districts — per Comprehensive Plan (Refer to Attachment 2) Office ... provide locations for medium and high intensity Residential — none Commercial Transition Institutional office, service, institutional, and residential land Non - residential — 5,000 Activity Node (OI) uses in areas where urban services are available square feet Commercial - Industrial or are to be made available as part of the Lot size shall be Transition Activity Node development process. This district is intended to appropriate to the provide for employment centers near method of water supply transportation routes. and sewage disposal ** NOTE — multi - family residences (i.e. a building and applicable ratio or lot containing 3 or more dwelling units) are standards (i.e. floor allowed in this district as a permitted use per area ratio, open space, Section 5.2 of the UDO. etc.) Agricultural ... provide sites in the rural portion of the County 40,000 square feet - lot Agricultural Residential Services for rural non -farm, non - residential uses which size shall be (AS) support the horticultural, silvicultural, and appropriate to the agricultural uses of the AR districts. method of water supply and sewage disposal and applicable ratio standards (i.e. open space, etc.) District Section 3.5 of the UDO - Purpose Section 3.5 of the UDO — Allowable Land Use Statements for `Industrial Districts' Minimum Lot Size Categories for districts — per Comprehensive Plan (Refer to Attachment 2) Light Industrial ... provide appropriately located and sized 80,000 square feet (outside Commercial - Industrial (1 -1) sites for limited industrial uses engaged in of a Commercial Industrial Transition Activity Node manufacturing, processing, creating and Transition Activity Node) Rural Industrial Activity assembling of goods, merchandise or 20,000 square feet (inside a Node equipment. Performance standards will be Commercial Industrial used to insure the absence of adverse Transition Activity Node) impacts beyond the immediate space occupied by the building. Required lot size shall be appropriate to the method of water supply and sewage disposal and applicable ratio standards (i.e. floor area ratio, open space, etc.) Medium ... provide locations for enterprises engaged 20,000 square feet — Commercial - Industrial Industrial (1 -2) in manufacturing, processing, creating, required lot size shall also Transition Activity Node repairing, renovating, painting, cleaning, and be based on compliance assembling of goods, merchandise or with applicable ratio equipment. Performance standards will be standards (i.e. floor area used to insure the absence of adverse ratio, open space, etc.) impact beyond the lot boundaries of the use. Heavy ... provide locations for enterprises engaged 20,000 square feet — Commercial - Industrial Industrial (1 -3) in a broad range of manufacturing, required lot size shall also Transition Activity Node processing, creating, repairing, renovating, be based on compliance painting, cleaning, or assembling of goods, with applicable ratio merchandise or equipment. Performance standards (i.e. floor area standards will be used to insure the ratio, open space, etc.) absences of adverse impacts beyond the zoning district boundary. Existing ... provide a district to be used only during 80,000 square feet Not specifically tied to a Industrial (EI) the application of zoning, to previously Land Use Category — unzoned townships to accommodate existing allowed wherever existing industrial uses not located in areas industrial operations were designated as Industrial Transition Activity located during imposition of Node or Rural Industrial Activity Node by the zoning adopted Comprehensive Plan. /o District Section 3.6 of the UDO - Purpose Section 3.6 of the UDO — Allowable Land Use Statements for `Other Districts' Minimum Lot Size Categories for districts — per Comprehensive Plan (Refer to Attachment 2) Public Interest ... preserve and protect certain public land 500,000 square feet Public Interest Area District (PID) and private educational lands, deemed environmentally sensitive and of major scientific research significance from the impacts of development. In addition, these lands will be managed in ways that will prevent any intentionally generated adverse impacts from affecting surrounding property. 30 District Section 3.7 of the UDO - Purpose Section 3.7 of the UDO — Allowable Land Use Statements for `Economic Development' Minimum Lot Size Categories for districts — per Comprehensive Plan (Refer to Attachment 2) Economic ... provide locations for a range of lower No minimum requirement — Economic Development Development intensity non - residential uses in the evaluated as part of site Transition Activity Node Buckhorn — designated Buckhorn Economic plan review and Lower Development District. demonstrated compliance Intensity with ratio standards. (EDB -1) Economic ... provide locations for a range of light No minimum requirement — Economic Development Development industrial, distribution, retail, office, and evaluated as part of site Transition Activity Node Buckhorn — services uses in the designated Buckhorn plan review and Higher Economic Development District. demonstrated compliance Intensity with ratio standards. (EDB -2) Economic ... provide locations for a range of lower No minimum requirement — Economic Development Development intensity non - residential uses in the evaluated as part of site Transition Activity Node Eno — Lower designated Eno Economic Development plan review and Intensity District. demonstrated compliance (EDE -1) ** NOTE — residential is allowed in this with ratio standards. district as a permitted use per Section 5.2 of the UDO. Economic ... provide locations for a range of light No minimum requirement — Economic Development Development industrial, distribution, retail, office, and evaluated as part of site Transition Activity Node Eno — Higher services uses in the designated Eno plan review and Intensity Economic Development District. demonstrated compliance (EDE -2) with ratio standards. Economic ... provide locations for low to moderately 20,000 square feet — Economic Development Development intense medical, professional, administrative required lot size shall also Transition Activity Node Hillsborough — and government office on small to mid -sized be based on compliance Linear Officer sites in the designated Hillsborough with applicable ratio (EDH -1) Economic Development District. standards (i.e. floor area The district is intended to be located on the ratio, open space, etc.) periphery of established residential areas and along major and minor thoroughfares. The district is established to provide convenient locations for offices, the size and operating characteristics of which require limited parking and which generate little traffic. Standards are designed so that this district may serve as a transitional land use between residential districts and higher, more intense land uses. 31 District Section 3.7 of the UDO - Purpose Section 3.7 of the UDO — Allowable Land Use Statements for `Economic Development' Minimum Lot Size Categories for districts — per Comprehensive Plan (Refer to Attachment 2) Economic ... provide locations for low intensity office 2 to 5 acres Economic Development Development uses and supporting services in the Transition Activity Node Hillsborough — designated Hillsborough Economic Linear Officer Development District. The district may (EDH -2) contain limited commercial uses within employment centers or where vehicular access is provided internally to the development. Economic ... provide locations for low intensity office 2 to 5 acres Economic Development Development uses and supporting services in the Resultant single - family lot Transition Activity Node Hillsborough — designated Hillsborough Economic sizes shall be a minimum of Limited Office Development District. The district may 7,500 square feet and a with contain low to moderate density residential maximum of 14,000 square Residential uses (1 -8 units per acre). feet if connected to public (EDH -3) sewer Economic ... provide locations for high intensity office 4 acres Economic Development Development uses and supporting services in the Transition Activity Node Hillsborough designated Hillsborough Economic Office (EDH -4) Development District. The district is intended to be located on large areas and may contain limited commercial uses within employment centers. Economic ... provide locations for a wide range of 4 acres Economic Development Development assembling, fabricating and light Transition Activity Node Hillsborough manufacturing activities, and such ancillary Office /Flex industrial activities as warehousing and (EDH -5) distribution in the designated Hillsborough Economic Development District. Some commercial services are also permitted accessory to industrial development provided all access is provided internally. The district is established to provide locations for industrial development which have little or no impact on adjoining properties. Future Land Use Map 32 of the Orange County Comprehensive Plan I — l Caswell Coun •RD � I � Person County y �C.eda' �� ,�': _ �. -'�" •v Lr I�iverTry r =i', h . �a �,. s � A it aMrsh � �� ���� G °,�� � Fz � a .��,oND � o : � � �aw sr • E -� � I • /,r�, 15i� �' z a i�— n ?�„pLaO 'fly �t 3 i • 'R, .+ °l, '�i LTTLE RI APO B lxk •� • e• . ti'U(�ater5f or�l�. R o ��� ➢6 �� r �f� ' S��j o ���' � Rl ­0 Of ,f, .I O ' t/`�. 7�, I •1 } . .7'1r' ' SC F ' ER D bd V 7id`ig C ReKS -H S. orough i � Arotj ". d. R l w -fe. • 1 1,�, a \; , „ i r '*" �!I +., 1+. p f MPR�'S- i ' 1 p - r. �a•' �` C. ;, � � � � (- _' � � 7a fi'� k /L Adoption Date Nov 16,2006 z Amended through September 2012 ea -i 1 E rah w w W I o � -r 'y )Mebane w �A y.� 'Sg .. �j.�� :! . L.. • � i,,�r M co I o. aR ���W� _ ✓ v � C 1 Q ,` z �� s. R'2 ✓ '�,� � :_�� t� I i, ! , � " G,2, v S � I j �7.s`L�,= -aLI OL RG G �pq 1 eu � ��� II • r � `O r Ho * 7�\ J a 0!, 7 i o I I v 1i Legend: :E _ ' '_ �f T 'i'� ®Watershed Critical Areas •I•ri'd�L r = �y�•"v_ e,�w3�7 o - `�r1 _ �'oL °�F Water Supply Watersheds Cola FH � P, � � �., .� � { o I QOC /CH /CA Joint Planning Area . 2 - Public Interest Areas Resource Protection Areas 10 Year Transition W• °ti ® r > \� ' ■ y �l�a r ? '. er .� �; _M 20 Year Transition RD I Rural Residential n , g Rural Buffer _ I � I . �5 , � � • y 'r - • _ 'o � • a •� • r �� i A /, �, a sy ,` + ' --� •• ceI . o o, ! P } .'. E ` D � R + �. O' ; � � Agri cultura l Residential ° N`o fL City Limits � ; i ETJ •s, o . S R o �! Activity Nodes l I Rural Neighborhood _ o t2 yo Commercial Transition N ESTe RO 71, ti A N Carrboro D eq y� Chatham County — - - - -- - — — + A, Commercial - Industrial Transition Economic Development Transition N Rural Community ,Qw ePHESU `Q Rural Industrial HURCH7�� tJG R�6 /�HRDSn 0 1 2 3 4 I Miles 1 in = 2.75 miles Orange Countyand Plann ng and Inspecfons Depanment- Th -s copy pnntetl September 25, 2D13- Map -s for reference use only Contact Plann -ng staffforvenfcat nl ofdata-