Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Agenda - 08-20-1996 - VIII-E
a 1 ORANGE COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS ACTION AGENDA ITEM ABSTRACT Meeting Date: August 20, 1996 Action Agenda Item#_ SUBJECT: La Mesa Subdivision,Phase II-Preliminary Plan ACTION BY: October 20, 1996 DEPARTMENT: Planning&Inspections PUBLIC HEARING: Yes—X—No BUDGET AMENDMENT REQUIRED: Yes—X—No ATTACHMENT(S): INFORMATION CONTACT: Emily Cameron Resolution of Approval Extension 2580 Application Vicinity Map Preliminary Plan TELEPHONE NUMBERS: Fiscal Impact Analysis Hillsborough -732-8181 8/7/96 Draft Planning Board Minutes Durham -688-7331 Mebane -227-2031 Chapel Hill -967-9251 PURPOSE: Consideration of the Preliminary Plan for La Mesa Subdivision,Phase II. BACKGROUND: The property is located in the northeast corner of the county south of Bacon Road(SR 153 1) between NC Highway 57 and the Person County line. The total acreage of the tract is 72.65 acres. It is currently zoned Agricultural Residential and Flat River Protected Watershed. In the Land Use Element of the Comprehensive Plan it is designated as Agricultural Residential and Water Supply Watershed. The property was part of a farm over twenty years ago.Former fields are now covered by typical early successional growth. Slopes are gentle except along two intermittent streams(one is not shown in Phase III) which flow generally east and southeast where limited slopes approach twenty percent(20%). The soils are typical for Orange County with moderate limitations for _septic systems,dwellings, and road construction. A Preliminary Plan for La Mesa was approved by the Board of Commissioners in August 1989. The Final Plat for Phase I containing eight(8) lots was approved in December of that year. Approval of the Preliminary Plan expired one year later because susequent final plats were not submitted.. The applicant is now seeking approval of Phase II which contains 45.38 acres to be divided into twenty(20)new residential lots.Lot sizes are between 0.98 and 6.2 acres.Each lot will have an individual well and septic system.Lot 16 does not have a site approved by Environmental Health 1 2 s for a septic system;therefore,before the Final Plat is prepared,the lot must either be approved for on-site sewage disposal,combined with adjacent lots, or retained as open space and restricted for development. In 1994 the average daily traffic count for this part of Bacon Road was 70 trips per day. Access to Bacon Road will be provided via La Mesa Lane, a new public cul de sac to be built to State standards. Two other public rights-of-way are reserved to serve future development in Phase III. A stubout was required as a condition of approval in 1989 and 1995 between lots 14 and 15 extending to the western boundary.A road connection would be made in the event adjacent property is developed in the future. On August 7, 1996,the Planning Board voted unanimously to approve the Preliminary Plan for La Mesa,Phase II,with public roads built to State standards and the conditions contained in the attached Resolution of Approval. RECONIlVIENDATION: The Administration recommends approval of the Preliminary Plan for La Mesa, Phase II, as per the Planning Board recommendation. 3 RESOLUTION OF THE ORANGE COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Date August 20, 1996 Name of Subdivision La Mesa Phase H Owner/Applicant Bob Pecaut The Board of County Commissioners hereby approves La Mesa Subdivision, Phase II, Preliminary Plat, dated June 1996 and containing 21 lots, subject to the fulfillment of requirements specified herein. All roads shall be irrevocably dedicated to the general public and be constructed to standards of the North Carolina Department of Transportation. The approval of this resolution authorizes and directs the Orange County Manager to accept for Orange County and on behalf of the public generally, the offer of dedication of La Mesa Lane and the rights-of-way for Hacienda Way, Cortez Court, and the unnamed stubout to the western boundary. This acceptance by Orange County of the dedication to the general public of La Mesa Lane and the rights-of-way for Hacienda Way, Cortez Court, and the unnamed stubout to the western boundary shall be without maintenance responsibility. These roads shall be maintained by the owner/applicant until such time as they are accepted for maintenance by the North Carolina Department of Transportation or some other governmental body. Before the Final Plat of La Mesa Phase H can be recorded: A. Sewage Disposal 1. Each residential lot shall contain an adequate area for sewage disposal and repair area, approved by the Orange County Division of Environmental Health. Lot 16 shall be combined with adjacent lots or retained as open space, unless a site for sewage disposal and repair is approved by OCHD. If no site is identified, the lot shall be labeled as having restricted development potential and so noted in the Declaration of Development Restrictions and Requirements - -prepared by-the Planning Staff and recorded concurrently with the Final Plat. 2. Disclosure that the septic system location may restrict the size and location of improvements shall be included in a document describing development restrictions to be recorded concurrently with the Final Plat. The document shall also disclose that information regarding the tentative location of septic systems is available from the Orange County Health Department, Division of Environmental Health. 4 Y B. Roads and Access 1. La Mesa Lane shall be constructed to standards of the North Carolina Department of Transportation, within a 60-foot right-of-way, and the construction shall be inspected and approved by NCDOT. OR A letter of credit, escrow agreement, or bond shall be submitted to secure construction of La Mesa Lane to the standards of the North Carolina Department of Transportation. An estimate of the construction cost must be prepared by a certified/licensed engineer or grading contractor and submitted to the Planning and Inspections Department. The financial guarantee must reflect 110% of that estimate and be issued by an accredited financial institution licensed to do business in North Carolina. The document describing development restrictions to be recorded with the Final Plat shall state that the financial guarantee will not be released until the road construction has been inspected and approved by NCDOT. 2. An erosion control plan for construction of the road shall be submitted by the applicant for review and approval by the Orange County Erosion Control Division. 3. 10' by 70' sight triangles shall be shown at each road intersection. 4. All lots shall access onto the new subdivision roads. This restriction shall be stated in a document describing development restrictions and requirements to be prepared by Planning Staff and recorded concurrently with the Final Plat. 5. Approved street name signs shall be erected at the intersection of streets as required in Section IV-B-3-c-12 of the Orange County Subdivision Regulations. Evidence shall be submitted by the applicant that the sign is in place or a copy of the receipt for purchase of the sign shall be submitted to the Planning Department. 6. Provide a deed to Orange County for the right-of-way stubout to the western - boundary between lots 14 and C. Land Use Buffers and Landscaping 1. Provisions for protection of existing trees as shown on the approved landscape plan shall be included in a document describing development restrictions and requirements to be prepared by Planning Staff and recorded concurrently with the Final Plat. 5 D. Drainage 1. Locate drainage easements as required following review and approval of the Erosion Control Plan. 2. Impervious surface data, as pursuant to Article 6.23 of the Zoning Ordinance shall be included in a document describing development restrictions and requirements to be prepared by Planning Staff and recorded concurrently with the Final Plat. 3. A stream buffer shall be provided as required by Article 6.23.7 of the Zoning Ordinance along the creek located on lots 18 and 19. The width of the buffer shall be stated on the face of the plat. Development restrictions within the buffer shall be specified in a document describing development restrictions and requirements to be prepared by Planning Staff and recorded concurrently with the Final Plat. E. Parkland 1. Cash in the amount of$9555 ($455 per lot) shall be paid to Orange County as payment in lieu of parkland dedication. F. Miscellaneous 1. The Final Plat shall contain a title block and vicinity map in accordance with Section V-D-2 and V-D-3 of the Orange County Subdivision Regulations. 2. The following easements shall be shown on the plat: a. existing drainage easement on lot 9. 3. A setback of 40 feet shall be maintained as measured from the edge of right-of-way of La Mesa Lane. Side yards shall be a minimum of 20 feet, and rear yards a minimum of 20 feet. These setback requirements shall be stated on the plat, and in a document describing development restrictions and requirements to be prepared by Planning Staff and recorded concurrently with the Final Plat. G. Certifications 1. A Certificate of Survey and Accuracy signed by a registered Land Surveyor shall be notarized on the face of the Final Plat. 2. A Certificate of Declaration and Maintenance in the form provided in Section V-D-6-b of the Orange County Subdivision Regulations signed by the landowner and developer shall be on the face of the plat and included in a document describing development restrictions to be recorded concurrently with the Final Plat. r- 6 Y 3. The Department of Environmental Health shall certify that all residential lots contain sufficient area for sewage disposal and repair. 4. The North Carolina Department of Transportation shall certify that La Mesa Lane has been constructed to State standards or that construction plans have been approved. 5. A Certificate of Approval signed by the Orange County Planning and Inspections Department. Signature of Applicant Clerk to the Board I, , accept the above listed conditions of subdivision approval, and acknowledge that each must be met prior to recordation of the final plat. Applicant Date APPLICATION ')R PRELIMINARY PLAN `,PPROVAL MAJOR SUBDIVISION 7 ORANGE COUNTY 1 DATE: U0 PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT (INK ONLY) 1' 4-24 SUBDIVISION NAME: A MESA, LOCATION: OWNER/DEVELOPER: ADDRESS: ZO1 �RAI�SDE�MiLL�R. TELEPHONE NO.: 490• (�06 AGENT/CONTACT: QEAI, C- 4AM LET i TELEPHONE NO.: 910- A. SUMMARY INFORMATION: Orange County Tax Map _ _ Block Lot(s) 38 Township LI-TTLE :�?IVIEl Zoning Oistrict(s): _kP-- Total Number of Acres: Z, (e 5 Phases: Total Number of Lots: Z I Average Lot Size: Minimum Lot Size: 0.98 A%e- NumberfType of Structures: (existing) N/As, (proposed) Linea( Feet in Streets: Z51G Acres in Open Space: udrvf—� — ALL WE�oDE3� Water Supply: Public (specify) Community Io4JF- LS Individual Wastewater Disposal: Public (specify) Community $7cFfJIG. -Individual School District: Fire District: 7I M 0 E nA KE General Land Uses in Area: Q_E511>E1 T"C &L. — A460-lcu ,rua-e: Critical Areas: stream/drainageways flood prone areas watershed (specify) historic sites other (explain) •, Is the property to be subdivided currently under "farm use value taxetion`Y Yes_No Y . If "yes', please contact the Orange County Tax Office. Subdivision of the property may require payment of deferred taxes under "farm use value taxation% B. All plats must be submitted on sheet no smaller than one inch equals two-hundred feet (1'=200') and no larger than one inch equals twenty feet (1'=20') end must contain the following information: ✓ subdivision name zoning of tract and adjacent. name & address of owner(s) properties . name & address of subdivider � �:�' ��. building setback lines by notation . (if other than owner) or typical lot layout >+ name of surveyor, engineer, `'r�r<'. location and width of existing and CC landscape architect or architect, prcpessd easements (drainage, address, registration 0 and seal utilities, roads, etc.) (title) Preliminary Plan existing, proposed and adjoining scale, north arrow rights-of-way including dimensions W ixwl (including revision dates) and street names and state road > �f township, tax map-block-lot numbers. Lineal-feet of road✓ yJ w references centerlines and approximate Parent Parcel Identification # acreage of new street rights-of-✓ C deed book and page # of property way +J w to be subdivided ` �_ V existing and proposed utilities, CU ���x��;<3.�:<��:a ,—+ cc -•� :::. .'.:�: boundary described with bearings including type, sizes, hydrants, E W and distances valves, manholes total acreage of the tract and 4► `:> existing and proposed curbs, v �c a� acreage of lots, including and gutters and culverts, including v excluding area within rights-of- sizes and grades rKs:?<ss L t way _ >:��:s:;: location and width of allays, U ul +� control corner sidewalks, bike lanes, transit systems, and bus stops (please complete reverse side) Proposed lot lines with dimensions typical street cross•sections and r lot $ blo -'•ck numbers intersect details including phasing lines design a width of travelway and ~` topography at tan foot (10) shoulders 8 4 — intervals horizontal alignment and general r C curve data (public roads) 0 .� :_ water bodies, streams, floodway to and floodplains centerline radius on all proposed cn stream buffers streets location and size of parcels permanent features such as V) U dedicated for public use, buildings, cemeteries, historic E w recreational use or reserved in landmarks .14 0 common, with purpose noted adjoining lot layout names of -0 W impervious surface data (if located adjoining property owners. If � U-4 — in water supply watershed) subdivided, subdivision plat name, "< s vicinity map showing general plat book & page number, and 1-4 co CL to location of subdivision with streets perimeter lot numbers. E m and roads identified by State road N a location and size of lots of U l number and name restricted development potential �c a) `? jf landscaping and buffer and notation on plat regarding U -0 U co requirements same t L 1J A ` '":< stormwater detention and/or U U) I✓A_ township, corporate and extra- territorial planning jurisdiction lines retention sites and undisturbed which cross the property areas for infiltration purposes (if located in water supply watershed) C. OTHER SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS 1. Twenty-five (25) copies of the preliminary plat. 2. One full size copy of an Orange County Tax map (with tax parcels involved clearly marked in pencil). 3. Where municipal or OWASA sewer is not available, a copy of the Preliminary Plat indicating Health Department soils analysis approval/denial for each lot shown thereon. 4. Where a private road is proposed a written statement by the applicant or his/her authorized representative which sets forth the justification for a private road (see Section IV-8-3-d-1 of the Orange County Subdivision Regulations). 5. Auxiliary documents, in draft form, prepared in accordance with Section Vl of.this Ordinance which assure completion and/or maintenance of improvements required by this Ordinance. Such documents may include, but not be limited to, a private road maintenance i,-r1--sTent, and articles of incorporation and restrictive covenants pertaining to a homeowner's association. These documents may be required as necessary as evidence that the ordinance requirements are being.met. 8. Fee - $350.00 plus $5.00 per lot 0 fee for proliminary and final plat). 7. If the subdivision contains 10 lots or more the following information shall be submittad with the eppli n. 1 e. WNuirnbisr of years to buildout. b. Number of houses to be built during each year to buildout. 90 �}pQ_ c.� AttgMq_price_of houses including Lots for each year to buildout._ I, the applicant, hereby rtify that a foregoing application is complete and accurate. APPLI ANT'S 9IGNATURE OWNER'S'SIGNATURE JUL.I.F. zs. uXJ F_ Zs DATE DATE FEES: Amount O Date Paid 7 — !D 9� Receipt N !D BOOS aa co 3T ''-- O r ASSESSED GL ; = O 1 .n.,.� 1 1 ��;a, ` oo� ev. .3s. aG •M. 1313 31 f}4 S327 6643 6 S • I Al x' 0.L. 6334 �' O 2]477 0.C. . O1 — 0.C. O I ••30 - -- � 1! 1 33.23 K 71 SC.1 . �� 31A AG 633aC a" 3� •..� \34-4 an 3 gi 0.0.,L22 N4C 9� 3441 1 1 i 4C 0.]1 � 1 9 �C1194 , rl • I a, ri 24.45 AC I - I \ I N I 1\ S.dAr- O-W loan+ We=,., 1 3 W.33 AC H ' O / / Y 30.QK %/ CAL. n.538 90.46 3C, i �� liL,pTCGTI�`DYVbTg E 5 .e s w �,� TE{� WAT=S9z PP L ' 43AS x 44.17 AC. --=------ %r/ •3403 10.15 s0. _ 12 OKS \ ri 9A �/ 1 LA MESA Applicant: Bob Pecaut Zoning: Agricultural Residential/FLAT-PW Land Use Element: Agricultural Residential and Water Supply Watershed Not to scale 10 FISCAL IMPACT ANALYSIS FOR LA MESA SUBDIVISION, PHASE H RESIDENTIAL SERVICE STANDARD APPROACH Prepared by The Orange County Planning Department July, 1996 PROJECT DESCRIPTION La Mesa Phase IV is a proposed 20-lot subdivision located in Little River Township. The lots are accessed by La Mesa Lane (public) which extends from the south side of Bacon Road. Phase I, approved by the Board of Commissioners in 1989, contains eight lots which front on Bacon Road. The current zoning is AR-Agricultural Residential. The average lot size is approximately 2.2 acres. Lots will be served by individual wells and septic systems. Project build-out is estimated at three years. Housing units will be constructed, beginning in 1997, with completion of the project scheduled for 1999. Units will consist of detached single-family homes, and the applicant estimates the average sales price to be$90,000 including the lot. METHODOLOGY Fiscal impact analysis is a projection of the direct, current, public costs and revenues associated with residential and non residential growth in the jurisdiction in which the growth is taking place. Fiscal impact analysis considers only direct impact in that it projects only the primary costs that will be incurred and the immediate revenues that will be generated. It calculates the financial effect of a planned development or new subdivision by considering the current costs and revenues such a development would generate if it were completed and occupied today. Fiscal impact analysis does not consider the private costs of public action. It is concerned only with public(governmental)costs and revenues. The method used in preparing the fiscal impact analysis is the Service Standard Approach. While only gross expenditures by service category are derived from the Per Capita Method, the Service Standard method determines the total number of additional employees by service function that will be required as a result of growth This method employs average county government costs per person, average school costs per pupil, an employee to population ratio, and average operating expenses per employee for each service category and school district. The number of new employees are projected and multiplied times the average operating expenses (includes personnel, operating and capital costs) per employee. These average costs are then weighed against per capita and per pupil revenues to project the total net fiscal impact of the development. RESIDENTIAL FISCAL IMPACT TEMPLATE: SERVICE STANDARD METHOD Bureau of Economic&Business Research-University of Florida Modified 5/13/96-Orange County,NC Planning Department SECTION 1 - PROJECT DATA: ENTER THE FOLLOWING DATA FOR EACH PROJECT: .......... ............. ...... ........ ..............X-.......... . ..VIM .... . .............. .. ..... ... .......................:.... ............. .. .................................... .. 4 ............. ....... . . .......... ..... .. TOWNSHIP: Little River ... CONSTRUCTION PERIOD: ........... ................................ .... .... ........................ ........ ............................ .............. . ..... ........ .................................xx: .. ............... .......... x ........ ........... --X- ............................. X X ........... .... --.............. ... ..... ......... X x ................................. Ending Year: 1999 .................. ........ ............ . ................. ....... ....... .................... ............. a X ....... .............. . ........ CHARACTERISTICS OF HOUSEHOLDS: ....... ..... ..... .......... Children/House: ENTER"I"BESIDE APPLICABLE X X s. .w.......... ...... x: A........P.....t..P.........L.............I........C..............A............ iB .:.:.:.L:X....E.. ...SCHOOL .. DISTRICT BELO....W........... ............. ..... ............ ............ 0..3..3 ...... ....... .. HOME SALES DATA: Average Distribution Number of Sales Price of Unit Y}e�aywr Homes ($) by Year ............. ...... ...................... ............ ................... ........ ..... .......... ........... .................. .................... .... ...........................................................................I.............6: ............ ..... j:X. ..... xxxx` —:,::::X., ......... ............... ............... ................................ % ....... . ............ .. ........... R ................ ............. xmxv. ............ X x ............. 1998 10 90000 50.00% .................... ........ ........ . . ............ ...... ............... ...... .............. XXXXX . ...... ::..................... ...... ............ .. .... .................. .......... ............... .......... ..... ........... . ........................... ........... ........ ... ...... 0M 2000 0 0 0.00% ....... ....... .......... ..................... ................. ........ ............................ ........... - ................ ...... . ........................... ...... ........... ............ .. .. ........... X, ......... ..... . ........ ....................... ..... .............. ...... 2002 0 0 0.00% .............. ......... .......... ........... ................:-.- .... ... ......... ............................... ........... ..... ..... ......... ......... ...... ........ ......... xxxx: ............ .......... ......... ............ ... X -X- . ..... . ......... ...................... ........ ......... ........... ..... ......... ............... 2004 0 0 0.00% ............. ........... ... . .:i ... ....... ... .. ........ ... a. ....... .... ................ :. ::..... -.... ... ...... ........... .............. . . ........ a . ......... ......... ......................... : . .":"%:...-...-.....:::::::::::::: ... ... '. .. q .......... X. .......... ..... . . ...... . ... ........ .. .. . ..... . .......... .... ....... . ..............X. xxxxxxxx a ... . ....... ..... .... X:.. ..... . .......... xx. ..................... ..................... .......... .... ::::, . ..................... 2006 0 0 0.00% SCHOOL DISTRICT DATA: ENTER-I-IN BESIDE SCHOOL DISTRICT IN WHICH PROJECT IS TO BE LOCATED TO GENERATE STUDENT DISTRIBUTION BY SCHOOL TYPE. School ... D..i...s....t.......i....c....t..:............................................................................................................................................... ........ .,...."...,....... ........ .................................................................................................................... .... X..........X.. i. ...............................................*...................... School Attendance: . ..........................X,. 1 T ........................ ......................................... .. .................. ... ....... Middle School 17% ........... ...... ..... ........ . ........... .......... .................................. ............ ............... .......... . . .......% . ....................... ..... x afm .. . .............. xx.................. ...................... .............. ...................................... 0-M ... ........W.I.. -------------- .. .... ...SOW ............. SECTION 2 - LOCAL GOVERNMENT AND SCHOOL DISTRICT DATA 12 I 'cI£'I'.. i::»;:;:>:::::::::::>::<:»::::>::»<::>::>::::::::><::><::>:<:::>i;.::>::::::::>::::::,:::>:::<:»:<:;::::::<::z?::#:;:::>;:>:::»?::::;:;::i::::>.....>::::>::::»>;:;:>:::>:<::::>::::;s::: :::t?;:>;:;:i;:::<::::::::`s»::::i?:::»::;:»:::i:::;::>::::::>;:>......:.....:::i::iii::>::<:.::z:.:«';::z:.;:.. ........................................................................ «:>::: ::.. ............. �3 COUNTY POPULATION: 105054 :::i:'i.:::isY:i::::i'i:::::::::::is::::i::i::::L::::ji�Jis����::::�v:i::i::i:<:i::i�:.:::i�:'i::i::::�::::::J::::S�i:::::i::::i i':i::ii:!:ii::ii::ij:::i::::::i:::(:::::::::::i::i::::::i::::i::::iii:::::i::i::i:::::::::"::� ;::i:C;:;(: ;: j; '':: :'*"*:......................: :::isi:: s::::is{::.....:......:...iJ...: ........T..'.......i�''.::.:.... .. *� 1�!Co SIR 11 :M ...... v. .:::..-..:hi;iii:is iii::.iiii:.iii:.::iii::i::.::::::::.?.iiii:.ii:i::ii?i:.ii?:;;;i:O;ii:?ii?::::::::::n'ii:.is",:1::::::ii::::::::::::::::::' .. _.. .....................:..::............................. ............. yt;.f.i:. COUNTY EMPLOYMENT: POSITIONS PER CAPITA ;;Oeztt <:::<:::>:;:::::<: iii<.:` ;; €>i1;<;; ': >':; <:; ><:` >`' <[[> ><:> > >« > >< <>>[>> >>[[>[[> >[> <>>>> <>>::> ''.':::_;.;''::»;<::»>:>::<:::>::> >': ">:: ap ......:.::.....................:.:::..::::::::::::::.....................................................:.::::::::......................................:.:::::. ... ........................... .. .- ::::::::" .1. ...................................................:.::::::..:............::::......... ::::::::::::::::::X.X. ::.:_:::::::<,:.>:.;;:......;:.;:.;:.;:.;:<.:.:.;;:.;:.;;;;::.>::;:i::ii::: Public Safety 140.50 0.0013 <:iii>::i::i::i;.::::::i::;*........... ::i>::i:;;::;:::::> ,..: '.... ........................................................... ;:i::ii::ii: . :ii::iii:.;:.;;.::.;;::;:.i:.; :.. ;:, .... ...W. ::::::::::::::.:::;:;;;:.::.::.:::.;:.::.::::.::.::.;;:.;:.;::..::.;::.::.::.;:.;:.;.::.;:<:<.;:.;:.;;:.:::<:.::i::ii::::iii:::::i::i::i::i::i::is:i::i:>:i:<:i*.-*.-:<:i::.... ,:::::;:.;:.;;:.;:.:.;.;:.;:.;;;;;;;;:.;:.;:.;:.;:.;;:.::;«.;,.;,.;::;;.;: . Human Sernces 258.90 A:0:::::*.:'0025 :..:.::;::.:...::::::;:: .'S Qi. ::::::::.........::::::::::::>::>::::>::::>: SCHOOL DISTRICT EMPLOYMENT: POSITIONS PER STUDENT ['t":<:: ." ;;;';;";;;' «<';; 2 ; ;;: - ;' > »><>«<> <»»>' » <>>? ;': ' `::? : :: : :`' :'`:: :': :'::::::::::::::''i';.:;:.;':i":.2:; >::::Vii. ::;;i.:::>:;;><>:.,;::: .............. .................... :::.>:.;:.;:.;:.;::.;::::;:::;::::i::i::i::ii:;;:.;::i' i::::::ii::.:;.;:.;;:.::.::::::: . ::::.:::::::::::::i::ii::i: ::i::i::i iii::ii::i:%:.;:.;:. ::.::.:.::.;:.;:.:i::i::::i::i:::ii;:::?.::}�:io.'. ;;;.::..:>:::.;ii:.::....: .. .:. COUNTY PER CAPITA REVENUES ($): REVENUES PER CAPITA '�: : . :::..::::::.:.::... :. . .. _....... Intergovernmental 8808821 83.85 X. ::i::i' :>:::>?:::i::::>::::>::::>:>:>::::>::::>::::>:::<::::>::>:>::::>::::>::>::>:<:::>:»::::-':<.....:»::>:::::>;;;::::::::>::>::::>::::>:::«<<:>:<:::::::::::>;;::::::::::::::::>::::::>::>::>:<:":"":>::>::>ii::>::::ii::;::::ii::i::i:<:i::i:<;::;:i::i::i::>:;::><:.;:.;:.;:.;;:;.;:.;:.;:.:;.;;;::;.;:.;:.;:;.;:.;:.;:.;;.;:;:;:< :::.::::::::. SEw#nco:: ....... ::::...............................::::.::::::::::::.::.::........................................................::::::::::::...............................:.:::::::::::::.::.:.......................:.:...:::.::::::.... tt :....:.::::::.:.::::::.::::::.:::::::::::::::::::::::......:::.:::::::::::::.::::::::::::::::::::::::::.:::::::.:::::::::....:::::.::::::::::::::.:::.:::::::::,:.::: .................................. ...................................... ...............213 »i` `[<> >':': :.:>;: >;; Miscellaneous 1405479 ::: ::::::::::.:13.3 8.. COUNTY PER CAPITA EXPENDITURES ($): EXPENDITURES PER CAPITA ..................:�a+ e n .:. :.;:.;:.;;:.::::.::':.:.:::.::...:..::::::::.. :::::: ::::::::::::::::;;:.;;;;;>:::.::.;;:.:.;:.;:;;;:..::_:-:.; Public Safety 6556151 62.41 :::.,. .:':: ........... Human Services 16864228 160.53 :::::::.:::.;:' t&. ) ::...::; DSO ::;:;.::;ii::i::::::.:::::.%. :::: .......::::.....::::........................ Non-Departmental 2984234 28.41 C�O�U;NTY PER EMPLOYEE EXPENDITURE ($): EXPENDITURES PER EMPLOYEE PPuybjlic?{S�arfe t3'................. :::::::..::::::.::.:::::::::::::655615:1.;:.;;>::,;.;;; .46663.00 i1f3,l ::1Y :::: "`' 2' ''> ...;;2 '` ' `` 2 Y Y .i [; '' >":;:;::>::>2::::i:i. ' ' 2:i::i::::2'Gi' ..............::.::::::::........................................::::::::..............::..::::::::::::::::::.:::::::::::::::.:::::::::::::;:.................:;.:.......:.;:.;:.;:.;:.;:.;;:.;;;::...: Human Services 16864228 65138.00 .d ► ............ .. . ...................................................:IY ::::::�:::::.-::: ::/...I..iY..i .i: SCHOOL DISTRICT PER STUDENT EXPENDITURES ($): EXPENDITURES PER STUDENT ::: :.::::.::::::::::::::::::::::..:::::.::::::.::..::.::::::::::<.::;.;:.;::::::.:;.:;.;;:<.;;::.::::<::::::.::::::::::.;:: :::>;::»:;111::;1::1:;.;:1:57 :,2 :iii ; School District 0 0.00 :::.;:><:<: :::«:»>:<:>:::::::>:::::::::::«<:::»1:::;:::::>:;::<:1:::<:>11>::>11::iiiii::::1::::i::iii:::;:.;:.;.:;.;:<::::.:<.;;:.;:;;;;;:.;:.;:.:.:.;:.::.::;:.:.;:.;:.;:.;;::.:;.;;:.;;:.;:.;.:::::::::::.:::::::::.::.::::::::.:::::::::::::.::::.............................. ....................:.::::.::.:::................::. :.:.:::::.....:. ,..,..n.1::.:'.:::.;:;.::::.::«:;:::.::::.:<.::.::::.::::.:.::::::.iii::::::::>:<.::::::.....:1:::::1111::11::>::iii:: .;..:.:«:11::;:1::1:::: >::::::::..::1:::;111ii11i:<:::1::: > «>>:<;: 5 2 s SCHOOL DISTRICT PER EMPLOYEE EXPENDITURES ($): EXPENDITURES PER EMPLOYEE :'<;::. t :....:.:::.... :..:::::.:::::::::::.::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::._:::::::;.;:.;:.;;;:.::>::.;.;:.:;.;;:;<:.;:.:.:;.;:;. :.;:.;:.;:.:::.::;:1:«<:>1::1::1 } 3> School District 0 0.00 ::.:::.:.:.........;:.;:.;:.;:.;:.;;:.:::.;;:;:.;:.;'.;;;;;::.>:.:;:.;::.>:.::.:::::.;:.;;1;::;: <::•::::11:;::::<:::::>:;::::;:.;;;;:.:::.::.1:.;>;;<:::::111::........ ::.;::.:«<:::i::ii; ............................................ � :::::::::::::::: 1&1 . :: TAX DATA: ENTER APPLICABLE ASSESSMENT RATIO AND ELDERLY EXEMPTION: :.:.::..::<.:;. :.;;'.;:>`viii:...;.::i.::: :..`:.. <» >'«'< > ` €»; ? «» '>'«< > '> <<? '* "' :> <>>'` `,>;::;°i' ,; ; >;:>:.... ::::>:<;< :::><:><::>...- :.:.::1...:::::::. :.; ::: :::::::;:.:;;:.;;:........... ::::..:..:::::.::.:::::::::::.;................:.;;:::::::::.:::::::::::: :: ;:.;:.1::1 :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::.:.;.;:::...;;;;.:.:.::::::::::::::::::.:::::::::::.:::::::.:::.:;.;:.:;::::::.: ..:::::: :.$I ..A Est >' t t18t t::::::: ( ) ::::::::::0.0000::::::::Per$100 Assessed Valuation ii;::>:: School District Tax Rate $ ::: :: :,,:,::..::::::::::::::::::::::.::::::::....................::::::._........::.::::::::::::::::::........ .::::._:::::::::::::.::..............:::::::.::::::::::::::::::::::::::..... Elderly Exemption 0 $11,000 Where Applicable SECTION 3- DEMOGRAPHIC PROJECTIONS BASED ON PROJECT DATA 13 ....... ......................... ...................... YEAR 1998 2000 ... .... ... ....... ..... ................... .............. ... ...... ........... .............. .. ........ . ... . .. ........ ...... ........... ... ..... ........ ............. ......... .......... HOUSING UNITS 20 ........ .. 20 ...... POPULATION ....................... ....................... ........... ............... ............. .......... X.......... ... ............... SCHOOL CHILDREN ............... Elementary ... 4 . .. .. ..... 4 .............................. .. .... ... >.::..:.;i:>..::::<::: ............... X, Middle .. .............. .................. High School . .... ...... ............... .. ........ ............................... ....... .... ......................... ...... ................. . .................. TOTAL . ..:::: .. .... ......... ............. ...........xw 7 7 ................ ............. ................. .... .. ...... ........... ... ..................................... ........... *......... ........ ... ......... COUNTY GOVERNMENT ...... X ................. ........ ... ADDITIONAL EMPLOYEES ................. X:........... ...... 05:... General Government 0.05.2...................,..-..---....::::::::::. 0. Bow ...... ........... .. . .........0'-'G 0.07 0.07 Public Safety ........... ................ .......... ....... .. .......... . ......... ............. .... . . ........ ... ...... ......... .. Public Works .................... 0.02 0.02 .......... ........... .......... ....... ............ ........ ........... ............................ Human Services ...................... .......... 0.12 0.12 ......... . ........ TOTAL 0.26 0.26 ................................. ...... ..... .......... X.. ........... .......... .... ........ .......... ... ... SCHOOL DISTRICT .. . . ........ ::1 . :::. ......... .. -'i::: - ................. 0.36-.. ........... X ............. . ........ .......... ........... ........... ........... ............ ............. .............. ............... ADDITIONAL EMPLOYEES .......... . .......... ........... ... ........... ................ »>». ........... YEAR 2003 2005 ............ . .... .. ... ................ ........... ................ ....... ... ..... ........................ ............ .... ...... ............... ...... .......... HOUSING UNITS .... ...... . ............... ....... .. .. ... 20 20 .................X.......... X. .............. .............. .............. POPULATION 49 49 X X. SCHOOL CHILDREN x, ............... Elementary . ........... 4 4 ...... Middle ............ High School X ................. ... ......... ............ TOTAL 7 7 ................... COUNTY GOVERNMENT X ADDITIONAL EMPLOYERS General Government 0.05:. 0.05:.': ..... ..... ............. ................. ... ........ .............. .............. 0. ............4.01 Public Safety 0.07:. 07 .............. ------------------ ........... 0.02 0. Public Works 02 ............... Human Services 0.12 0. .... ............... ...... ................ --2 0.26 TOTAL 0.26: ....... ..... ........................ ........... .. ....... ..... ................ ... . ............. ........ . ............. ........ .......... ......:':.:;#h............. ............... SCHOOL DISTRICT 0.36 . . ........ .0. X. ............... X. ............ ...................... .............................. .................. ............ .................. ........................................... ............ ,ADDITIONAL EMPLOYEES ......... .......... ......................................... ..... . .. .... ..................................... N im SECTION 4-PROJECTED FISCAL IMPACT OF PROJECT ON COUNTY GOVERNMENT 14 YEAR 1998 ..:.:�.. 2000 TAX BASE 1000 1823 1915 REVENUES $ ( ) < <>><> ::::P r o T ax » 13749 :» 1444 rT Othe Taxes �$... 2312 2429 Intergovernmental <> >���3 '« 4246 '> [[[[s>> ...: < 7I... �3��.::. 4461 Service ce Charges e s � ................... 1389::: �:� > ? 14 59 : »>[>>:'>�> < < ..:,>:>.:,:: ::, ::Msc ell ane 0 us 677 7 X.TOTAL ($) 22373 >>€111111 23506 EXPENDITURES S $ General Ge a Government e 5�5... 3208 >::>; Public Safety Y 3160 3320 Public Works o ks .....:.:.�.��i.4. 1398 >`` >`! ><>; .'. Human Services >::>::»::»::»>::>:: 8 128 <<<<<`><> �> � ::::::.$���::: 8540 .:. :: Education -1: 10991 .................. ...:..I.I�6Is... 11547 Non-Departmental ..........`.' ` .: :1438 1511 : TOTAL 28256 ' '><':>�>� [' <> :. ��,.;:.: 29686 : . . ...;.::. ... 0- 5882 NET FI SCAL IMPACT ::> -618 . : : YEAR 2003<���<< [«» »> :;; ..................................... 2005 TAX BASE 1000 2062 '<<>�?<� <'<<<<> ....::::���.:.: 2166 REVENUES S $ Property Tax > <>IIII13]?'`> 1555 Perk' ................................ .... 5i.�.5... 1 6 3 4 3 «<<>««««<16:T� rT Othe Taxes 2616 :.:: 2748 Intergovernmental nter ove ental 4804 5047 . <: Service ce Char es 157 2 Charges 1651 `:<` :<::<:::<:>::>: Mi 1 sce lan eous i� 7 ? '���...:..? 66 1i< ?' 111111'11">'IIIII�:..::>•"` 411. »<:<::<:>:::<:>:<:................... :;:::......................'71t0... 805 <:>:<»':>»«<><>:>' :: 1. TOTAL $ 25313 «<[ > > `:���` > > :..:...:�: 26595 EXPENDITURES S $ n Ge a r al Government t 3629 `>«����� <':«':»���`:��;">� < ...3.. 3813 Public b c Safe 357 g Safety 3756 Public Works 1505 ?:� ��<»':?�`>»: `:" �� 1581 Human Services s 9197 �<'>�'>':>'�>' >`>«['> ``'����'` » .....::�..14. .�.t�.:: 9662 ;Education 12435 .;; 13065 . Non-Departmental al 162 1710 TOTAL O AL $ V*8�.. 31969 33587 XXXX T X65 NET FISCAL IMPACT ( ) >�::<: :::>:::......................:. :::. -6992 <>«':< <........... .; a SECTION 5 - PROJECTED FISCAL IMPACT OF PROJECT ON SCHOOL DISTRICT � 15 99 000 >«>�>< �><> > >:'::;:.:>::>::, YEAR >::>:<::«:::>::»::>::>::>::>::>::>:. ..... REVENUES O$ County 109 115 . ..:...... School stnct State 17134 <`< . : `:`' 18001 S 84 ::>::::>:<:»»>::»:::>::>::>::>:...:......... TOTAL 2 124 :< ::>:::::>:: >::><' TO $ 8 2954 ( ) EXPENDITURES $ ( ) ` [ [<€€> >T .8<3'C oun ty .. 10991 11547 > . : : <..«...>.«....«..«:S chool District 0............ ...... ....>.<...<...<...[.#:1.i.s State 17134 >»»>`:<>»`'`:``<``::.:'> 18001 »> >««'::»:::>:::: I75 ... ........... 5 ... 124 [ <>€»> >»»'>::::»::>::'' TOTAL 28 29548 :::>::>:::: »:.. NET FISCAL EWPA T 0 < '> ``>_` YEAR 2003«<>_<««`:>»<> ;.;:; `s'< 2005 »>'>>>':<' REVENUES(S) <'' ?12435 13065 C oun ty ...................................... School District >:«««.......... «<:>:«:»:#1< .. 0 »i<i<«««<<> '<<;>..... 19385 ><<>><»» > ?':.:`.,.. `? 20367 »»[>`«« State ««:>;::::>::::>::>;::»»:::I Imo.. 21t.. ................. ......................... .................... 31820 > ...'.....:;<>«>T TOTAL $ ;> < ;:.::.<:.> ..>........<<' .......#` >EXPENDI TU RE S $ < » » .. <.;'.. '. . : .>Coun tY 12435 13065 ..... 0» 1»€School District 0 » ««< . State >_:< °.B.I `:> 19385 >> >»»<>><<>1II 2036 # .. TOTAL 31 820 «>< > <;<_ >'' 33431 << <'> T NET FISCAL]IMPACT ( ) C SECTION 6- SUMMARY OF PROJECTED DEMOGRAPHIC/FISCAL IMPACTS 16 »Y EAR , 00> . 20<[ > >> HOUSING UNITS »:: .... :> :: ....:: >::>::::> r0.:. POPULATION ..................................... SCHOOL CHILDREN Elementary Mi ddl e 1 '< Hi School Sh ........................ TOTAL >> COUNTY EMPLOYEES 0 SCHOOL EMPLOYEES L YEES ....................::::::::::::::::. TAX BASE S 1000 1823 1915 COUNTY BUDGET S Revenues eve u es <<> sl:�`���`. � 2237 �.�� ��.:.; 23506 Expenditures tur e s «> 28256 . ;.;:.:;.;...:.:.:.......................:.::.:.:.:.:.:.........:. 296 BALANCE -5882 >> 180 SCHOOL DISTRICT CT BUDGET S Revenues eve ues 281 4 ............ .......... . 29548 Expenditures tares >� `:� �.< 28124 �>`>�>>>'[[�``:» <<>': � ......28�... 29548 '> >...>.?.?.`.`;. ..: BALANCE COMBINED BUDGETS S R n eve ues ��.7# ... 53054 04 Expenditures tares 56380 59234 BALANCE ';« »:: : „ -588 >::<>:<:»:<:»»::: < >' <� :::<: -6180 YEAR ::>:<:::>::»::»: 2003................ ........� .::. 2005 HOUSING ING UN TT S POPULATION SCHOOL CHILDREN Elementary Mi ddle Hi School 001 »:«;:::««::«<:>::»::>::>::>:<::<:::>:: TOTAL 0. COUNTY O NTY EMP LOYEES 0.26 SCHOOL EMPLOYEES 0.36>`'?��? �> »�'? �?�»�`>:;;?'°>' ..::.:.�. .. 0.36 TAX BAS E 1 S 000 206 >:>««<::.......... ..... .« 2166 COUNTY BUDGET S Revenues e ues 25313 >>�`:<>':�> '`� `: ` . < .:.;: ��....1�....�..;:.: 26595 ':.':�il< < ><€€� �fl> Expenditures dlture s 31969 <' ? <> <'<;>;.:::": .,:::�<>' . � 33587 BALANCE -6655 .........�.:: .........«�.�.�'�; -6992 >»< ''>»........... SCHOOL DISTRICT BUDGET S Revenues e ues 31820 ><> '�<'>`> :..: '�,..�,�,� 33431 Expenditures dltures 31820 33431 > BALANCE <: III 0 COMBINED BUDGETS $ Revenues ues 57 ::<;:»>::<:>::: >.:..�� 134 �4fl .........� '' ::: 60026 Expenditures tures .. 7 :.;:. BALANCE < <`«' > -665 5 X. :»<:««::::;:>: <; -6992 �'> >�>::.:::.::::.::. .. .:; SECTION 7- SUMMARY OF PROJECTED PUBLIC SCHOOL CAPACITY IMPACTS 17 SCHOOL DISTRICT DATA: School District: School Attendance: Tqx-......... ....... ... ............ ... ... ......... ...... ... ....................;... ....... ..... ......:::: -** .. .................... ... ....... .................. .............. .. . ............... ................ N-1, ............... ......... ............... ............. .. .............. . ...................... .......... . .... Middle School 17% ................................... .............. ..... ............... .. ........ .. ...... ...... ... ....... . ....... .. .. ............ i4 ................................. .............. ............. ............. . . ... ....... .......... ............ .... . X.. ......... ........ ....... W .......... .... SO.W.."O. ..... ........ YEAR 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 ................. ................... SCHOOL CHILDREN ............................................. .... .......... ............... ......... ... ............................. ....................................... ..................................... ............ ...................................... .............. ............ Elementary 4 4 ................... ......................... ..................... ..................................... I .......................... ....................... ..................... 1 ... . ... .... ............ ................................. Middle .. .. .................................... ..... ...... ......... ......... ... . ......... ........ ..... ........... . .. ........ .... High School . ..... ..................... ........... ..................... .. ....... ...................................... .............. ........... ... ............. ................. ............ 7 ............ ......... TOTAL Ou YEAR 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 ...............................I.... ......................... ... ........ ................. SCHOOL CHILDREN X....................................... ...................... ........... ................................. ..... ............. ....... ....................... ..................... ......... ........ .... ........X.:. ..... .... ... ..... ............... 4 .......... ..4.... Elementary 4 .......... .... .. .... ....... ..... ..... .. Middle .......... ......... .... ......... .................... ....... ....................... .... . .. ......... . ........ . ........ .... ............................................ ...................... High School . ......................... .......................... ........ . ...... .............. ........................ ..................................... ...................................... .................................... ...................................... ..................................... ...................... .......I'' 7. ........................... 7 7 ..........................1 ............................. TOTAL SCHOOL CAPACITIES—ALL SCHOOLS CURRENT ENROLLMENT—ALL SCHOOLS ............................ ..........................I................................ swa; ............................... ... .... ............ ... ...... ...... ... ... ..................... . ....... .............................. ....... ............. .. ............. ... ....... ............. ............. .......... ...... ... ... ...... .............. ................ ......... .. .. ......... ........ ......... .... . ..................................... Nfiddle 1522 Middle 1267 ......................................... ...... ............... .................................. ........... ............... = ...........................4.x .................. .......... . ..... ....... . ..... ........ ... : M TOTAL 59701 TOTAL 56171 YEAR 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 ........... ...... ............... ... xe PROJECTED ENROLLMENT Elementary 2872 2872 . ................. X......,.......... ................ ...................................... ............ .:: ...... .... ........ ..... 1268 12 :>: .: Middle ......... ............. ............................... 1483 lhgh School 1483 ....... ... .............................................. ... . ... ... ......... 5624 ......... 567A TOTAL ......... ....... I ... .. ......... 21 YEAR 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 . ......... .... ........ . . ....... ......................... PROJECTED ENROLLMENT Elementary 2872 2872 Nfiddle 1268 1268 1483 1483 High School 5624 5624 TOTAL x... .............................. l W � � 18 � (2) La Mesa (21 Lots-Little River Township) Presentation by Emily Cameron. The property is located in the northeast comer of the county south of Bacon Road (SR 153 1)between NC Highway 57 and the Person County line. The total acreage of the tract is 72.65 acres. It is currently zoned Agricultural Residential and Flat River Protected Watershed. In the Land Use Element of the comprehensive Plan it is designated as Agricultural Residential and Water Supply Watershed. The property was part of a farm over twenty years ago.Former fields are now covered by typical early successional growth. Slopes are gentle except along two intermittent streams(one is not show in Phase III)which flow generally east and southeast where limited slopes approach twenty percent(20%).The soils are typical for Orange County with moderate limitations for septic systems,dwellings,and road construction. The Preliminary Plan for La Mesa was approved by the Board of Commissioners in August 1989. The Final Plat for Phase I containing eight(8)lots was approved in December of that year. Approval of the Preliminary Plan expired one year later because subsequent final plats were not submitted. To reactivate the subdivision,the applicants submitted a Concept Plan which was approved by the Planning Board on August 20, 1995. The Concept Plan was almost identical to the 1989 Preliminary Plan featuring public roads and 38 lots ranging in size from one to five acres. Phase II contains 45.38 acres which the applicant proposes to divide into twenty (20)new residential lots.Lot sizes are between 0.98 and 6.2 acres.Each lot will have an individual well and septic system. Lot 16 does not have a site approved by Environmental Health for a septic system;therefore,before the Final Plat is prepared,the lot must either be approved for on-site sewage disposal,combined with adjacent lots,or retained as open space and restricted for development. In 1994 the average daily traffic count for this part of Bacon Road was 70 trips per day. Access to Bacon Road will be provided via La Mesa Lane,a new public cul de sac to be built to State standards. Two other public rights-of-way are reserved to serve future development in Phase III. A stubout was required as a condition of approval in 1989 and 1995 between lots 14 and 15 extending to the western boundary. A road connection would be made in the event adjacent property is developed in the future. . The Planning Staff recommends approval of the Preliminary Plan for La Mesa, Phase H,with public roads built to State standards and the conditions contained in the Resolution of Approval(an attachment to these minutes on pages ). Hoecke asked for more information on lot 16. Cameron responded that it some clearing of dense vegetation must be done to obtain access for checking. Brooks asked if the Planning Board could decide the use of lot 16 if no perc site is found. Cameron responded a significant design change would require reconsideration.. 1 © U U LTL1 19 Price asked when phases III and IV would be submitted. Cameron responded that Phase III will be the 23 acres that has already been submitted as a concept plan which is about to expire. If it does expire, it will come in later under the new provisions. Price continued expressing concern with the road system. Cameron responded that on the concept plan there were two cul-de-sacs in Phase III. Once all of the soils work is completed,densities may change and the roads may not be built as shown on the concept plan. Price was concerned with the amount of traffic being dumped onto Bacon Road. Cameron noted that due to the soils and stream buffers there would not be as many as twenty lots. MOTION: Barrows moved approval as recommended by the Planning Staff. Seconded by Hoecke. VOTE: Unanimous. AGENDA ITEM#9: MATTERS HEARD AT PUBLIC HEARING 5/28/96 a. Zoning Ordinance Teat Amendments (1) Telecommunication Towers Presentation by Mary Willis. Concern with the increasing number of telecommunication towers has been raised locally and nationwide by citizens,advisory boards and governing boards in recent years. At the November 27, 1995 public hearing,the Orange County Board of Commissioners and Planning Board received citizen comments on a proposed amendment to Special Use Permit provisions relating to telecommunication towers. The speakers at the public hearing included five industry representatives and one Orange County resident. On January 18, 1996,the Ordinance Review Committee,as well as another interested Planning Board member and a member of the Board of Adjustment met with the telecommunication providers who spoke at the public hearing. The purpose of the meeting was for the Committee to gain an understanding of issues and technical concerns raised at the public hearing and to consider modifications to the proposal which would address those issues while maintaining the purpose and intent of the proposed amendment. One of the major issues raised at the public hearing concerned the potential health effects of electro-magnetic radiation. The telecommunications Act of 1996(Section 704(Bxiv)and the Federal Communications Commission New National Wireless Tower Siting Policies (Section 1.1307(b))prohibit denial of a cellular telephone facility on the basis of health effects if it meets applicable standards issued by the American National Standards Institute(ANSI). Studies conducted in 1994 and 1995 for a 360 tower located at 515 South Greensboro Street,are on file in the Planning Department. Conclusions of the 1995 study state that"exposure levels measured on the ground and inside the equipment shelter.....continue to be more than one hundred times less than the protection guides