HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda - 05-28-1996 - C1 F4 ,ate
1 X11
ORANGECOUNTY
BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
ACTION AGENDA ITEM ABSTRACT
Meeting Date: May 28. 1996
Action Agenda
Item# C 1
SUBJECT: PROPOSED AMENDMENT-EDUCATIONAL FACILITIES IMPACT FEE ORDINANCE
DEPARTMENT: PLANNING PUBLIC HEARING:—X—Yes No
BUDGET AMENDMENT REQUIRED: Yes X No
ATTACHMENT(S): INFORMATION CONTACT:
Proposed Amendment Planning Director-Extension 2592
TELEPHONE NUMBERS
Hillsborough 732-8181
Durham 688-7331
Mebane 227-2031
Chapel Hill 967-9251
PURPOSE: To receive citizen comment on a proposed amendment to the Educational
Facilities Impact Fee Ordinance.
BACKGROUND: The proposed amendment is for the purpose of considering an increase in the
current schedule of impact fees..Specifically, Section 3, School Impact Fees
Imposed on New Residential Structures, is proposed for amendment to increase .
the impact fee in the Chapel Hill-Carrboro School District from $1,500 to no
more than $3,000. The change is based on a recalculation of the fees in the
Educational Facilities Impact Fee Technical Report and reflects new
demographic data concerning students per household as well as the
recommendations of the School Facilities Construction Standards Work Group.
No increase in the impact fee in the Orange County School District is proposed.
Action on the proposed amendment may be taken immediately following the
public hearing.
RECOMN[ENDATION: As the Board decides.
0
r 2
PROPOSED ORDINANCE/PLAN AMENDMENT
t
ORDINANCE/PLAN: EDUCATIONAL FACILITIES IMPACT FEE ORDINANCE
REFERENCE: Section 3 School Impact Fees Imposed on New Residential Structures
ORIGIN OF-AMENDMIENT: __Staff Planning Board__X BOCC Citizen
Other:
STAFF PRIORITY RECOMMENDATION:__X_High Middle Low
PUBLIC HEARING DATE: May 28, 1996
PURPOSE OF AMENDMENT: To amend the Educational Facilities Impact Fee Ordinance to consider
increasing the current schedule of impact fees.
IMPACTS/ISSUES: The proposed amendment is for the purpose of considering an increase in the current
schedule of impact fees. Specifically, Section 3, School Impact Fees Imposed on New Residential
Structures, is proposed for amendment to increase the impact fee in the Chapel Hill-Carrboro School
District from $1,500 to no more than $3,000. The change is based on a recalculation of the fees in the
Educational Facilities Impact Fee Technical Report and reflects new demographic data concerning students
per household as well as the recommendations of the School Facilities Construction Standards Work
Group.
No increase in the impact fee in the Orange County School District is proposed.
EXISTING/PROPOSED ORDINANCE/PLAN PROVISIONS:
Applicable sections of the ordinance are shown below. Text to be deleted is shown in suikegwsegk
highlighting,while new wording is shown in boldface italics type.
SEC7ION3-SCHOOL IMPACT FEES IMPOSED ON
NEW RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNITS
In addition to all other charges prescribed by ordinance or resolution now or hereafter in effect,
there shall be public school impact fees charged to new residential dwelling units located within Orange
County, and within the municipalities and their extraterritorial planning jurisdictions located within
Orange County. No person may occupy any new residential dwelling unit until all applicable public
school impact fees contained in the following schedule have been paid in full. No certificate of occupancy
or other type of occupancy permit shall be issued for any new residential dwelling unit until the public
school impact fees hereby required have been paid in full. Payment of such fees shall not relieve the
feepayer from the obligation to comply with applicable land development regulations of Orange County or
the municipalities located within Orange County.
U3
3
Schedule of Public School Impact Fees
The amount of the public school impact fee will be $750 per residential dwelling unit in the Orange
County School District. The amount of the public school impact fee will be $!,SOO $3,000 per residential
dwelling unit in the Chapel Hill-Carrboro School District.
ORDINANCE.REVIEW COMMITTEE:
PLANNING BOARD REVIEW:
BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS REVIEW: