Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Agenda - 03-06-1996 - VIII-C
e 1 ORANGE COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS ACTION AGENDA ITEM ABSTRACT Meeting Date: March 6. 1996 Action Agenda Item #Amore. SUBJECT: Phase 2 Charles' Woods Subdivision- Preliminary Plan ACTION BY: April 20, 1996 DEPARTMENT: PLANNING PUBLIC HEARING Yes X No BUDGET AMENDMENT REQUIRED Yes X No ATTACHMENT(S): INFORMATION CONTACT: Eddie Kirk Extension 2582 Resolution of Approval Application Vicinity Map TELEPHONE NUMBERS: Fiscal Impact Analysis Hillsborough- 732-8181 Preliminary Plan Durham - 699-7331 Draft 2/19/96 Planning Board Minutes Mebane - 227-2031 Chapel Hill - 967-9251 PURPOSE: To consider the Preliminary Plan for Phase 2 Charles' Woods Subdivision. BACKGROUND: The property is located on the east side of Dumont Drive (SR 1595) in Eno Township. It is zoned AR and L-ENO-PW and designated Agricultural Residential and Lower Eno Protected Watershed in the Land Use Element of the Comprehensive Plan. The approved Concept Plan involved 52 lots with a total area of 81.2 acres proposed to be subdivided. This phase includes 17.30 acres. Twelve (12) lots are proposed which average 1.26 acres in size. All lots would have individual wells and septic tanks. All roads are proposed to be public. Alex Drive will be the main entrance road extending northeast from Phase 1. Settlers Trace will extend off Alex Drive to serve the individual lots. In Phase 1 Alex Drive intersected with Dumont Drive which is off the south side of Saint Mary's Road. The Planning Board approved the Concept Plan for Charles' Woods Subdivision on May 15, 1995. Phase 1 of the Preliminary Plan contained 15 lots and was approved by the Board of Commissioners on September 5, 1995. 2 On February 19, 1996,the Planning Board unanimously recommended approval of the Preliminary Plan for Phase 2 Charles' Woods Subdivision per the attached Resolution of Approval. RECOMMENDATION: The Administration recommends approval of the Preliminary Plan for Phase 2 Charles' Woods Subdivision per the attached Resolution of Approval. 3 RESOLUTION OF THE ORANGE COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Date March 6. 1996 Name of Subdivision Phase 2 Charles' Woods Owner/Applicant George W. Thomnson/Jeffrey Peloquin The Board of County Commissioners hereby approves Phase 2 Charles' Woods subdivision preliminary plat, dated June 1, 1995 and containing 12 lots in Orange County, subject to the fulfillment of requirements specified herein. Alex Drive, Parker's Path and Settlers Trace shall be irrevocably dedicated to the general public and be constructed to standards of the North Carolina Department of Transportation. The approval of this resolution authorizes and directs the Orange County Manager to accept for Orange County and on behalf of the public generally, the offer of dedication of Alex Drive, Parker's Path and Settlers Trace. This acceptance by Orange County of the dedication to the general public of Alex Drive, Parker's Path and Settlers Trace shall be without maintenance responsibility. These roads shall be maintained by the owner/applicant until such time as they are accepted for maintenance by the North Carolina Department of Transportation or some other governmental body. Before the Final Plat of Phase 2 Charles' Woods can be recorded: A. Sewage Disposal 1. Each residential lot shall contain an adequate area for septic disposal, and repair area, approved by the Orange County Division of Environmental Health. 2. The septic system location may restrict the size and location of improvements. This disclosure shall be included in a document describing development restrictions to be recorded concurrently with the Final Plat. The document shall also disclose that information regarding the tentative location of septic systems is available from the Orange County Health Department, Division of Environmental Health. B. Roads and Access 1. Alex Drive shall be constructed to standards of the North Carolina Department of Transportation, within a 60-foot right-of-way, and the construction shall be inspected and approved by NCDOT. Settlers Trace shall be constructed to 4 standards of the North Carolina Department of Transportation, within a 50 foot right-of-way and the construction shall be inspected and approved by NCDOT. OR A letter of credit, escrow agreement, or bond shall be submitted to secure construction of Alex Drive and Settlers Trace to the standards of the North Carolina Department of Transportation. An estimate of the construction cost must be prepared by a certified/licensed engineer or grading contractor and submitted to the Planning and Inspections Department. The financial guarantee must reflect 110% of that estimate and be issued by an accredited financial institution licensed to do business in North Carolina. The document describing development restrictions to be recorded with the Final Plat shall state that the financial guarantee will not be released until the road construction has been inspected and approved by NCDOT. 2. Submit an erosion control plan for construction of the roads. 3. A sight triangle to NCDOT standards shall be shown at the intersection of Alex Drive and Parker's Path and Alex Drive and Settlers Trace.. 4. An approved street name sign shall be erected at the intersection of streets as required in Section IV-B-3-c-12 of the Orange County Subdivision Regulations. Evidence shall be submitted by the applicant that the sign is in place or a copy of the receipt for purchase of the sign shall be submitted to the Planning Department. 5. All lots shall receive access from the subdivision roads.. 6. A turnaround to NCDOT standards shall be provided at the end of Alex Drive. C. Land Use Buffers and Landscaping 1. Landscaping shall be installed or preserved as indicated on the approved landscape plan, and must be inspected and approved by the Planning and Inspections Department. OR Guaranteed financially through a letter of credit, escrow agreement, or bond submitted to secure landscape requirement installation and preservation. An estimate of the cost for required preservation, plantings and their installation must be provided. The financial guarantee shall reflect 110% of the estimate and be issued by an accredited financial institution licensed to do business in North Carolina. 5 2. Provisions for protection of existing trees as shown on the approved landscape plan shall be included in a document describing development restrictions and requirements to be prepared by Planning Staff and recorded concurrently with the Final Plat. D. Drainage 1. A 30 foot drainage easement shall be provided between lots 20 and 21 as required by the Orange County Erosion Control Officer. E. Parkland 1. Cash in the amount of$814.00 [($2,375/acre x 12/35 acre)] shall be paid to Orange County as payment in lieu of parkland dedication. F. Miscellaneous 1. The Final Plat shall contain a title block and vicinity map in accordance with Section V-D-2 and V-D-3 of the Orange County Subdivision Regulations. G. Certifications 1. A Certificate of Survey and Accuracy signed by a registered Land Surveyor shall be notarized on the face of the Final Plat. 2. A Certificate of Declaration and Maintenance in the form provided in Section V-D-6-b of the Orange County Subdivision Regulations signed by the landowner and developer shall be on the face of the plat and included in a document describing development restrictions to be recorded concurrently with the Final Plat. 3. The Department of Environmental Health shall certify that all lot residential lots contain sufficient area for septic tank disposal and repair. 4. The North Carolina Department of Transportation shall certify that Alex Drive and Settlers Trace have been constructed to State standards or that construction plans have been approved. 6 5. A Certificate of Approval signed by the Orange County Planning and Inspections Department. Signature of Applicant Clerk to the Board I, , accept the above listed conditions of subdivision approval, and acknowledge that each must be met prior to recordation of the final plat. Applicant Date APPLICATION FOR PRELIMINARY PLAN APPROVAL MAJOR SUBDIVISION s/93 -- - 7 ORANGE COUNTY • DATE: PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT (INK ONLY) �+ I� r SUBDIVISION NAME: GN AF LE 5" H AS Z LOCATION: tDUMOvk-j 9(21�1� I 00TH T. MKfz-`{s TZd. OWNER/DEVELOPER: (S 50(ZG E W. I HOM PSaIs l7DJ Gt.A S C(2f}�T(L>✓ ADDRESS: '32001 ST. M ftl2 (S TELEPHONE NO.: H I I_LS BOfLoJGH 2?2?S AGENT/CONTACT: SGT' PELOC��ln1 TELEPHONE NO.: Z9- 7S�3 3211 TwIrJ 572F.r�nn5 (�d. Ct4APa - Ht" 2751 (o A. SUMMARY INFORMATION: Orange County Tax Map 145 Block Lot(s) Z U Township E 0 Zoning District(s): A-2- Total Number of Acres: Phases: 1 Total Number of Lots: 17-_Average Lot Size: /• Ac Minimum Lot Size: Number/Type of Structures: (existing) e— (proposed) L Lineal Feet in Streets: Li1 Q Acres in Open Space: Water Supply: Public (specify) Community Individual Wastewater Disposal: Public (specify) Community / Individual School District: Fire'District: General Land Uses in Area: MfelGULTV2/t-L - 12ES ID97M__r1A L Critical Areas: stream/drainageways flood prone areas watershed (specify) historic sites other (explain) / Is the property to be subdivided currently under "farm use value taxation"? Yes_No_-/ If "yes% please contact the Orange County Tax Office. Subdivision of the property may require payment of deferred taxes under "farm use value taxation'. B. All plats must be submitted on sheet no smaller than one inch equals two-hundred feet (1'=200') and no larger than one inch equals twenty feet (1'=20') and must contain the following'information: ✓ subdivision name ✓ 3<' :'•.ti zoning of tract and adjacent. name &address of ownerts) properties name & address of subdivider buildin g setback lines by notation / (if other than owner) or typical lot layout > �/ '�:A name of surveyor, engineer, ✓ location and width of existing and C landscape architect or architect, proposed easements (drainage, address, registration #and seal utilities, roads, etc.) y (title) Preliminary Plan ✓ existing, proposed and adjoining _ scale, north arrow rights-of-way including dimensions data (including revision dates) and street names and state road _ township, tax map-block-lot numbers. Lineal fast of road y references centerlines and approximate C / Parent Parcel Identification # acreage of now street rights-of- dead book and page # of property way w to be subdivided ✓ existing and proposed utilities, a3 'o m ✓ z< >''{ boundary described with bearings including type, sizes, hydrants, c Lr and distances valves, manholes ✓ ''' "' total acreage of the tract and _ existing and proposed curbs. acreage of lots, including and gutters and culverts, including v -M excluding area within rights-of- sizes and grades cu way location and width of alleys, C-3 Cn control corner sidewalks, bike lanes, transit systems, and bus stops (please complete reverse side) proposed lot lines with dimensions typical street cross-sections and lot & block numbers intersection details including phasing lines design and width of travelway and topography at ton foot (10) shoulders intervals horizontal alignment and general • cc water bodies, streams, floodway curve data (public roads) Q and floodplains /* centerline radius on all proposed 'n stream buffers streets location and size of parcels permanent features such as 0 L) dedicated for public use, buildings, cemeteries, historic E .,I (V 44 recreational use or reserved in landmarks -W C)4.4 common, with purpose noted adjoining lot layout names of 4 impervious surface data (if located adjoining property owners. If in water supply watershed) subdivided, subdivision plot name, -P 4-4 a) I/ = vicinity map showing general plat book & page number, and . 4 co location of subdivision with streets perimeter lot numbers. CL a) E W and roads identified by State road number and name restricted development potential and notation on plat regarding -Nc a) ✓ landscaping and buffer U 'a ame co cc requirements = township, corporate and extra- :tormwater detention and/or territorial planning jurisdiction lines retention sites and undisturbed which cross the property areas for infiltration purposes (if located in water supply watershed) C. OTHER SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS 1 Twenty-five (25) copies of the preliminary plat. 2. One full size copy of an Orange County Tax map (with tax parcels involved clearly marked in pencil). 3. Where municipal or OWASA sewer is not available, a copy of the Preliminary Plat indicating Health Department soils analysis approval/denial for each lot shown thereon. 4. Where a private road is proposed a written statement by the applicant or his/her authorized representative which sets forth the justification for a private road (see Section IV-B-3-d-1 of the Orange County Subdivision Regulations). 5. Auxiliary documents, in draft form, prepared in accordance with Section VL of.this Ordinance which assure completion and/or maintenance of improvements required by this Ordinance. Such documents may include, but not be limited to, a private road maintenance agreement, and articles of incorporation and restrictive covenants pertaining to a homeowner's association. These documents may be required as necessary as evidence that the ordinance requirements are being met. a. Fee - $350.00 plus $5.00 per lot (1 fee for preliminary and final plat). 7. It the subdivision contains 10 lots or more the following information shall be submitted with the application: a. Number of years to buildout. b. Number of houses to be built during each year to buildout. C. Average price of houses including lots for each year to buildout. 1, the applicant, hereby certify that the foregoing application is complete and accurate. i'c',7xN r-'s_SA T U 8 E OWNER'S-SIGNATURE /;, - /,Z - _1�- t ) - �-5 DATE DATE FEES: Amount Date Paid Receipt # r r �'t V'•w rn �R O CL 0 R py y lb r ♦ � $ i0 ♦ aJ A Q � � -� ♦ ,gyp �!+a��L.• � � � `O � G �Ooa 4♦ � ♦ L ._ 4 O rb �('�'� fv � 1 a N 7 . �O A{p � dpi N 'Llr •"Ir' A w i { �� �OZ / 94 ��,��, !�` Y Aa ��// s 140 �j L o�••'i• • ,rtii /J/ t;.f .��♦ .sl�'ar � .+rLYp � + a�� 1,.. / / i•`ti M _ a lb 4 ,� / L• •e1 V ! !y v �. N• Vf O; 4 .�71t ♦ ✓ a th ft b 1 ` rNf u Al T 6 t ♦ A • N 9� ru to d � .ro/--\ / w u ,o w. N V1C/NM AMP w � i ; w V N tS a•NOm a 10 ♦ sr. O 'ij .a 10 + FISCAL IMPACT ANALYSIS FOR CHARLES'WOODS PHASE II RESIDENTIAL SERVICE STANDARD APPROACH Prepared by The Orange County Planning Department February, 1996 PROJECT DESCRIPTION Charles'Woods Phase II,is a proposed 12-lot subdivision located in Eno Township. The lots are access by Ales Drive, which intersects with Dumont Drive about 1/3 mile east of St. Mary's Road. The current zoning is Aft-Agricultural Residential and is in the Lower Eno Protected Watershed. The average lot size is approximately 1.26 acres.All lots will be served by individual wells and septic systems,and a new public road. For Phase II of Charles'Woods,project build-out is estimated at two years.Housing units will be constructed, beginning in 1996, with completion of the project scheduled by 1998. Units will consist of detached single-family homes,and the applicant estimates the average sales price to be$145,000,including the lot. A separate fiscal impact analysis was prepared in 1995 for Phase I of Charles' Woods, which contained 15 lots. METHODOLOGY Fiscal impact analysis is a projection of the direct, current, public costs and revenues associated with residential and non residential growth in the jurisdiction in which the growth is taking place. Fiscal impact analysis considers only direct impact in that it projects only the primary costs that will be incurred and the immediate revenues that will be generated. It calculates the financial effect of a planned development or new subdivision by considering the current costs and revenues such a development would generate if it were completed and occupied today.Fiscal impact analysis does not consider the private costs of public action. It is concerned only with public (governmental) costs and revenues. The method used in preparing the fiscal impact analysis is the Service Standard Approach. While only gross expenditures by service category are derived from the Per Capita Method,the Service Standard method determines the total number of additional employees by service function that will be required as a result of growth. This method employs average county government costs per person, average school costs per pupil, an employee to population ratio, and average operating expenses per employee for each service category and school district. The number of new employees are projected and multiplied times the average operating expenses(includes personnel,operating and capital costs)per employee. These average costs are then weighed against per capita and per pupil revenues to project the total net fiscal impact of the development. 11 TABLE OF CONTENTS SERVICE STANDARD APPROACH PROJECT FISCAL IMPACT ANALYSIS Section 1 - Project Data Project Name, Township, School District Beginning Year, Ending Year, Inflation Characteristics of Households Construction Schedule/Cost Data Section 2 - Local Government and School District Data Budget Year Per Capita Revenues Per Capita Expenditures Per Student Expenditures School District Per Employee Expenditures Employees Per 1000 Population County Per Employee Expenditure Other Data Other Model Constants School District Data Section 3 - Demographic Projections Based On Project Data Total Housing Total Population School Children Additional County Employees Total School District Additional Employees Section 4 - Projected Net Fiscal Impact on County Tax Base Revenues Expenditures Net Fiscal Impact Section 5 - Projected Net Fiscal Impact on School District Revenues Expenditures Net Fiscal Impact Section 6 - Summary of Projected Impacts Additional Housing Additional Population Additional School Children Tax Base County Government Balance School District Balance Total Net Fiscal Impact 12 EXPLANATION OF TERMS AND DATA SOURCES SECTION 1 -PROJECT DATA Project data includes information about the specific development project. Much, if not all, of the information is supplied by the applicant. Data inputs include: Project Name: Name of the project. Township: Township in which the project is located. School District: School district in which the project is located. Beginning Year: The first year of the project in which dwelling units are completed and occupied. Ending Year: The last year in which dwelling units are completed and occupied.The template is set to calculate fiscal impacts for a ten-year period. Inflation Rate: Unless an inflation rate is entered, the template will calculate fiscal impacts based on constant dollars. Since the inflation rate changes frequently, the Finance Department must be contacted for the most recent figure. Persons/Household:The estimated average number of persons/household(dwelling unit) based on 1990 Census data for the township in which the project is located. This information is supplied by the Planning Department and will be updated as necessary using population projections and building permit data. Children/Household: The estimated average number of school age children/household (dwelling unit) based on 1990 Census data for the township in which the project is located_ This information is supplied by the Planning Department and will be updated as necessary using school membership data. %Non-Elderly:N.C.General Statutes permit an$11,000 exemption to the elderly and disabled who meet certain income criteria In the event that elderly units are part of the project, the percentage of eligible non-elderly units is entered. The tax base will automatically be adjusted to reflect the exemption. Number of Homes:The number of dwelling units to be constructed in the project in each year. Average Sales Price:The average sales price of all dwelling units based on the number and sales price of dwelling unit types to be constructed in each year. l 13 SECTION 2 - LOCAL GOVERNMENT AND SCHOOL DISTRICT DATA Local government data includes information regarding expenditures required to provide County services and revenues received based on the approved Orange County budget for the fiscal year in which the project is considered for approval.All information derived from the approved budget remains constant throughout a fiscal year (July-June) and is changed only with the approval of a new budget. Local government revenue and expenditure information is compiled on a per capita (per person) basis. Per capita figures are derived by dividing the total expenditures for a particular service function or revenue source by the'estimated population of Orange County for the year in which the project is considered for approval. Populations estimates are prepared by the Planning Department. Data inputs include the following. Budget Year: The current fiscal year; i.e., 1994-95. Per Capita Revenues: The sources of revenue by major category are as follows: Taxes-Other Than Property:Revenues from taxes other than property taxes include those from sales and use taxes, franchise taxes, and animal taxes. Intergovernmental Aid: Revenues from this source, in the form of categorical aid or shared-tax revenues, are provided through State and federal assistance programs. Service Charges: Service (or user) charges support numerous functions and are charged to those who voluntarily receive governmental services or use governmental facilities. Miscellaneous:Miscellaneous revenues include interest earnings on investments,proceeds from license and permit fees, and all other revenues.' Per Capita Expenditures: Expenditures by major category are as follows: General Government: Services related to the legislative, administrative, financial, and legal functions of government. Public Safety: Law enforcement services and emergency medical services. Public Works: Efforts related to the maintenance of County-owned property and the provision of sanitation (solid waste disposal) services. Human Services: Departments responsible for the'provision of health, social, and recreation-related services. Education: Orange County supports two school units,the Orange County school system and the Chapel Hill\Carrboro school system. This category includes appropriations made to the designated school system for Recurring Capital items. Recurring Capital funds are used for general maintenance,purchase of new equipment/furnishings and vehicle maintenance. Non-Departmental: Contributions to agencies providing cultural and social services outside the formal structure of county government. Other expenditures include equipment replacement and contingency funds. Although there are no employees generated by this category,it has been included as an operating expenditure. It will be included in Section 4,"Total Annual County Expenditure." These expenditures will be calculated on a per capita basis as opposed to a per employee basis. f 14 Per Student Expenditures:Information regarding expenditures required to provide educational services and revenues received are based on the approved school system budgets for the fiscal year in which the project is considered for approval. All information derived from the approved budgets remains constant throughout a fiscal year (July-June) and is changed only with the approval of new budgets. Expenditure information is compiled on a per student basis for County Government Current Expense, School District and State appropriations. County Government Current Expense funds are used for general operation purposes including Instruction and Support Services. Federal revenues and expenditures and other local revenues such as Fund Balance have not been included since they are not directly growth related. Per student figures are derived by dividing the total appropriation for educational purposes from a particular source by the estimated number of students to be enrolled in the applicable school system for the year in which the project is considered for approval. Student enrollments are obtained from the approved school system budgets. County Government: Expenditures in this category are based on appropriations to the school systems by Orange County for Current Expense. The minimum level of per student appropriation is determined by the State Board of Education. School District:Expenditures in this category are unique to the Chapel Hill-Carrboro school system and are based on the level of expenditures possible through assessment of a supplementary school tax. State: Expenditures in this category are based on appropriations from the State Board of Education. School District Per Employee Expenditure: Expenditures per employee based on County, School District and State appropriations, and the total number of school district employees. Employees Per 1000 Population:The number of employees in a particular service category per 1000 population. County Per Employee Expenditure: The average operating and capital expenses per employee in a particular service category. Total expenses in each category includes personnel,operating and capital costs. Other Data- County Government Tax Rate: The County tax rate per $100 of assessed valuation. Since the per capita method focuses only on operating expenditures, the tax rate is reduced by an amount equal to the debt service payments from property taxes for capital projects. School District Tax Rate:The supplementary tax assessed on behalf of the Chapel Hill-Carrboro school system. Assessment Ratio:The ratio of market(sales)value to assessed value based on information supplied by the Tax Office. The assessment ratio is used to convert market value to assessed value for the purpose of computing the tax base. Other Model Constants Elderly Exemption:For projects developed partially or exclusively for elderly(65 and older)or disabled individuals whose annual income does not exceed$12,000,an$11,000 tax exemption is used in projecting the tax base. School District Employees Per Student: The number of employees per student in a specific school district. 15 SECTION 3 - DEMOGRAPHIC PROJECTIONS BASED ON PROJECT DATA Demographic projections provide information about the number of new residents and school children anticipated in Orange County resulting from project development.Projections also provide the number of additional employees required per service function and school district as a result of the new development. Total Housing Units: The cumulative total of new housing units added each year by project development. Total Population:The total population added each year by a project derived by multiplying the number of homes to be constructed by the number of persons per household (see Section 1). School Population: The total number of school children added each year by a project derived by multiplying the number of homes constructed by the number of children per household (see Section 1). Additional County Employees: The number of additional employees required per service category beised on project development. Total: Total of all additional county employees required based on project development. School District Additional Employees: The number of additional employees required per school district based on the project development. SECTION 4 - PROJECTED NET FISCAL VdPACT ON COUNTY Tag Base: The tax base represents the increase in assessed property value expected each year resulting from project development.The values shown are in$1,000's and are derived from a formula which includes the number and sales price of homes, and the assessment ratio. Where applicable, the percentage of non-elderly units and elderly exemption are also used. Revenues:All revenues are derived from a formula which multiplies the per capita revenues(Section 2) times the projected population(Section 3). The exception to this is the property tax which multiplies the tax base times the county government tax rate. Expenditures: All expenditures are derived from a formula which multiplies the per employee expenditure (Section 2) times the number of additional employees (Section 3). Net Fiscal Impact: The net balance is the difference between projected expenditures and projected revenues. A negative net balance indicates that it costs Orange County more to provide services to a project than it receives in revenues.A positive net balance indicates that more revenues are received than it costs to serve a project. Positive net balances in one project may thus be used to offset negative balances in another. 16 SECTION 5 - PROJECTED NET FISCAL IlVIPACT ON SCHOOL DISTRICT Revenues: The County contribution is derived by transferring education expenditures by County government(Section 4).Revenues derived from the school district tax are derived by multiplying the school district tax times the tax base. State revenues are derived by multiplying the per student expenditure figure times the total projected number of school children (Section 3). Expenditures: Expenditures are derived from a formula which multiplies each per student expenditure (Section.2) times the total projected number of school children (Section 3) and adding the results. Net Fiscal Impact: The net balance is the difference between projected expenditures and projected revenues. A negative net balance indicates that it costs the school system more to provide educational services for children in a project than it receives in revenues.A positive net balance indicates that more revenues are received than it costs to serve a project. Positive net balances in one project may thus be used to offset negative balances in another. SECTION 6 - SUMMARY OF PROJECTED IMPACTS SECTION 7 - SUMMARY OF PROJECTED PUBLIC SCHOOL CAPACITY I M[PACTS RESIDENTIAL FISCAL IMPACT TEMPLATE: SERVICE STANDARD METHOD 17 Bureau of Economic 8t Business Research — University of Florida Modified 3/15/95 — Orange County,NC Planning Department SECTION 1 - PROJECT DATA: ENTER THE FOLLOWING DATA FOR EACH PROJECT: PROJECT:; Charles'Woods Phase II: TOWNSHIP• _ _ Eno _ _ CONSTRUCTION PERIOD: Beginning Year.:: 1996 Ending Year: 1998 Inflation Rate: 2.90%` CHARACTERISTICS OF HOUSEHOLDS: Persans/Hause. 122. Children/House: 0.29 %NoII—Elderly: 100.00°la'' HOME SALES DATA: Average Distribution Number of Sales Price of Units Year Homes S by Year 1996 6 1'45000 50.00 _. 1997 6 145000 50.00% 1998 0 0 0.00%d 1999 0 0 0.000/0 .. 2000 0 0 U 00% __... 2001 0 0 0.000/0 2002 2003 0 0 0.000/0 2004 0 0 O.OQ°lo _. __. 2005 0 0 0.00% SCHOOL DISTRICT DATA: ENTER"1"IN( )BESIDE SCHOOL DISTRICT IN WHICH PROJECT IS TO BE LOCATED TO GENERATE STUDENT DISTRIBUTION BY SCHOOL TYPE. School District: School Attendance: Orange County (: : I:} Elementary School 50°0: Middle School 23% Chapel 1-M Cirrbow.w 0 Hi School 27°10 SCHOOL AGE CHILDREN/HOUSEHOLD: ENTER NUMBER OF UNITS BY HOUSING TYPE TO GENERATE NUMBER OF SCHOOL AGE CHILDREN. Children School Age Housing a Units Per House Children Single—Family 12. 0.29 3 Duplex/Triplex/Quadplex 0 0 0 AparMent! 6.1. inium 0: 0... 0: Town House 0 0 0 Totals 1.2 .? ©.29. 3'. SECTION — LOCAL GOVERNMENT AND SCHOOL DISTRICT DATA 18 BUDGET YEARN 1994-95 COUNTY POPULATION 102894 SCHOOL DISTRICT STUDENT POPULATION;' 5582 COUNTY EMPLOYMENT: POSITIONS PER CAPITA General Government 11008 0.0011` Public Safety 138.75 0.0013 Public Works SQ.00 0.0005 Human Services 25338 0.0025 Education 'School:District 74450 0.0072 SCHOOL DISTRICT EMPLOYMENT: POSITIONS PER STUDENT Total 744SO 0.1334; COUNTY PER CAPITA REVENUES S): REVENUES PER CAPITA Taxes—C}ther Than Property 4387997 Intergovernmental 9053572 87.99 Service Charges. 2775491 26.97 Miscellaneous 1089416 10.59 COUNTY PER CAPITA EXPENDITURES S : EXPENDITURES PER CAPITA General Goyertunent 6532710 63.49 Public Safety 6350477 61.72 Public Work3 2739666 26.63 Human Services 16618148 16151 Education(Recurring Capital) 750000 729! Non-Departmental 2787882 27.09 COUNTY PER EMPLOYEE EXPENDITURE S : EXPENDITURES PER EMPLOYEE General 6vernme tt. 653271 5934781 Public Safety 6350477 4576920 Public Works 2739666 547-Human Services 16618148 65587.17 Eduction Recurrin Ca "tal 75000Q 100739 SCHOOL DISTRICT PER STUDENT EXPENDITURES S : EXPENDITURES PER STUDENT county Govertment 8099482. 1451.E10! School District 0 0.00 State.! 18977908 3399.84 SCHOOL DISTRICT PER EMPLOYEE EXPENDITURES S : EXPENDITURES PER EMPLOYEE County Government 8099482 108'7909 School District 0 0.00 State:.! 1&977908 2549081 TAX DATA: ENTER APPLICABLE ASSESSMENT RATIO AND ELDERLY EXEMPTION: County Tax Rate ($) 0.7460' Per 5100 Assessed Valuation School e District Tax Rat $ _ O 0.0000 Per$100 Assessed Valuation Assessment Ratio 100.00 Elderly Exemption 0 511,000 Where Applicable 19 SECTION 3 - DEMOGRAPHIC PROJECTIONS BASED ON PROJECT DATA YEAR 1996 1997 1998,: 1999 2000 HOUSING UNITS 6 12 I2! 12 12 POPULATION 13 27 27 27 27 SCHOOL CHILDREN Elementary 1 2 2 2 2. Middle © 1 1 1 1 High School 0! 1 1 1 1 TOTAL 2< 3 3- 3 COUNTY GOVERNMENT ADDITIONAL EMPLOYEES General Government 0.0 0.0 0A`. 0.0 0.0' Public Safety 0.0., 0.0 0.0! 0.0 0.0 Public Works OA 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Human Services 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1' TOTAL 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1! SCHOOL DISTRICT 0.1': 0.2 0.2 0.2 .0.2 ADDITIONAL EMPLOYEES YEAR 2001< 2002 2003;! 2004 2005<' HOUSING UNITS 12`! 12 12:: 12 12 POPULATION 27> 27 27. 27 2? SCHOOL CHILDREN Elementary 2` 2 2> 2 2 Middle 1 1 1 1 1 High School TOTAL 3' 3 3 3 3I COUNTY GOVERNMENT ADDITIONAL EMPLOYEES General Government 0.0 0.0 0.01 0.0 04 Public Safety 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0i Public Works Q.0 0.0 0.0. 0.0 Off Human Services Q.1 0.1 (}:1. 0.1 0.1` TOTAL G.1- 0.1 0.1 0_I SCHOOL DISTRICT 0.2 0.2 0.2' 0.2 0.2: ADDITIONAL EMPLOYEES l SECTION 4 — PROJECTED FISCAL IMPACT OF PROJECT ON COUNTY GOVERNMENT 20 YEAR 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 TAX BASE($1000) 970.- 1765 i816:- 1869 1923 REVENUES(S) Property Tax 6490; 13169 135$1 13943 14348 Other Taxes 5668 1169 1203: 1238 1274 Intergovernmental 1172 2412 2482: 2554 2628 Service Charges 359'. 739 761 783 806! Miscellaneous 142` 290 299 307 316 TOTAL (S) 8731 ! 17779 18295: 18825 19371' EXPENDITURES(S) General Government 846 1740 1791 1843 18%. Public Safety 822, 1692 1741; 1791 1843 Public Works 355 730 751; 773 795 Human Services 2151; 4427 45561, 4688 4824' Education 2622:1 5396 5552 5713 5879 Non—Departmental 365;: 743 764! 786 809 TOTAL (S) 7156 14728 IS15S 15595 16047 NET FISCAL IMPACTS 1574:: 3051 3140 3231 3325 YEAR 20Q1! 2002 200X:: 2004 2005' TAX BASE($1000) 1979::: 2036 2096 2156 2219. REVENUES (S) Property Tax 14764:: 15192 15633 16086 16552 Other Taxes 1311; 1349 1388> 1428 1469 Intergovernmental 2783 2863': 2946 3032 Service Charges 829:! 853 878> 903 929:. Miscellaneous 325 335 345` 355 365: TOTAL ($) 19933: 20511 21106< 21718 22348 EXPENDITURES(S) General Government 195t, 2008 2066 21m : 2188 Public Safety 1897:;: 1952 2008: 2067 21271 Public Works 81&! 842 866;: 892 917 Human Services ..4964' 5108 5256> 5408 5565; Education 6049!' 6225 6405:: 6591 6782 Non—Departmental 833; 857 882' 907 934 TOTAL ($) 16512 169511 :: 17494: 18513 NET FISCAL IMPACTS 3421'' 3520 3622 3727 . 3835 1 21 SECTION 5 - PROJECTED FISCAL IMPACT OF PROJECT ON SCHOOL DISTRICT YEAR 1996 1997 1998: 1999 2000 REVENUES(S) County 2622 5396 5552 5713 5879; School District p p p' p p: State 5916 12175 W28: 12891 13265 TOTAL (S) 8538 17570 19080 18604 19144 EXPENDITURES (S) County 2622! 5396 5552`: 5713 5879 School District 0 0 ;i 0 0 p State 5916> 12175 12528' 12891 13265' TOTAL (S) 8538 17570 18080 18604 19144'' NET FISCAL IMPACT S) 0< 0 0 0 0 YEAR 2001 2002 2003 : 2004 2005' REVENUES(S) County 6049 6226 6405 6691 6782 School District 0 0 0 0 0' State 13649 14045 14451: 14872 15303 TOTAL (S) 19699: 20270 20858; 21463 22085 EXPENDITURES(S) County 6049 6225 64Q5 6591 6782 School District 0? 0 0 0 0 State 13649 14045 14453' 14872 15303 TOTAL (S) 19699 20270 MM.. 21463 22085 NET FISCAL IMPACTS © 0 0 0 0 SECTION 6 — SUMMARY OF PROJECTED DEMOGRAPHIC/FISCALIMPACTS 22 1 YEAR 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 HOUSING UNITS 6 12 12 12 12 POPULATION 131 27 Z? 27 27 SCHOOL CHILDREN Elementary 1 2 2. 2 2 Middle 0.' 1 1 1 1 High School 0 1 1 1 1 TOTAL 2 3 3 3' COUNTY EMPLOYEES 0.1 0.1 O.l. 0.1 0.1 SCHOOL EMPLOYEES Q,1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 Tax BASE($1000) 870 1765 i81b 1869 1923, COUNTY BUDGET(S) Revenues 8731::: 17779 18295: 18825 19371'' Expenditures 7156! 14728 15155! 15595 16047' BALANCE 1574 3051 3140;: 3231 3325' SCHOOL DISTRICT BUDGET($) Revenues 8538`1 17570 . 18080:: 18604 19144 Expenditures 8538; 17570 18480; 18604 19144 BALANCE 0'' O 0 COMBINED BUDGETS($) Revenues 17268.; 35350 36375` 37430 38515 Expenditures 156941 32298 33235::; 34199 35190 BALANCE 1574z 3051 3140 3231 3325 YEAR 2001 2002 2QQ3 2004 2005 HOUSING uxrrs 12.:, 12 12 12 12 POPULATION 27 27 27` 27 27 SCHOOL CHILDREN Elementary 2 2 2 2 2 Middle 1 1 1 1 1 High School 1 1 1 1 1 TOTAL 3 3 3< 3 3 COUNTY EMPLOYEES 0.1 0.1 O.L 0.1 0.1 SCHOOL EMPLOYEES Q.2 0.2 0.2' 0.2 0.2 TAX BASE($1000) 1979 2036 2096 2156 2219 COUNTY BUDGET($) Revenues :119933.: 20511 21106` 21718 22348: Expenditures 16512. 16991 17484 17991 18513 BALANCE 3421 3520 3622 3727 3835 SCHOOL DISTRICT BUDGET($) Revenues 19699. 20270 X .20858 4. 21463 22085 Expenditures 19699 20270 248581 21463 22085 BALANCE p> p 0 U' COMBINED BUDGETS($) Revenues 39632! 40781 419641 43181 44433 Expenditures 36211`, 37261 38342 39454 40598 BALANCE 3421 3520 3622! 3727 3835 1 23 , SECTION 7 - SUMMARY OF PROJECTED PUBLIC SCHOOL CAPACITY IMPACTS SCHOOL DISTRICT DATA: ENTER"1"IN( )BESIDE SCHOOL DISTRICT IN WHICH PROJECT IS TO BE LOCATED TO GENERATE STUDENT DISTRIBUTION BY SCHOOL TYPE. School District: School Attendance: Orange County ( 1 ) Elementary School 50°!0 Middle School 23% Chapel Hill—CArtboro 0 Hi School 27% YEAR 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 SCHOOL CHILDREN Elementary I'! 2 2! 2 Z. Middle 0 High School 0 1 1 1 1 TOTAL Z 3 3? 3 3' YEAR 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 SCHOOL CHILDREN Elementary 2 2 2 2 2 Middle High School TOTAL 3-! 3 3 3 3; SCHOOL CAPACITIES-ALL SCHOOLS CURRENT ENROLLMENT -ALL SCHOOLS Elementary 2838 Elementary 2767' Middle 1232 Middle 1290 Hi School 1518 Hi School 1505 TOTAL 5588 TOTAL 5562 YEAR 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 PROJECTED ENROLLMENT Elementary 2768 2769 .2769:: 2769 2769 Middle 1290_ 1291 1291 1291 :1291 High School 1505 1506 I506: 1506 1506 TOTAL 5564:: 5565 5565' 5565 5565`` YEAR 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 PROJECTED ENROLLMENT Elementary 2769::! 2769 2769.: 2769 2769 Middle 1291;: 1291 1291... 1291 1291 High School 1506' 1506 -1506 1506 1506' TOTAL 5565 5565 5565 5565 5565 l Draft 2/19/96 Planning Board Minutes DRAFT 24 be provided between lots 11 and 12 for a future road extension. 2 . Access for lots 1 and 17 shall be from the subdivision road. 3 . Lots 18 and 19 shall have a joint driveway. Waddell asked about the easement to the east . Kirk responded that the exact location would depend upon possible lot line changes due to perc sites. That would be on the preliminary plan. Katz asked about the branch with the 100-foot stream buffer. Kirk responded that was another item that could change at the preliminary plan stage. The stream buffer would have to extend to the road; therefore, the possibility is great that there will be fewer than 19 lots when the preliminary plan is presented. MOTION: Waddell moved approval with the Planning Staff recommendations . Seconded by Reid. VOTE: Unanimous . DRAFT b. Preliminary Plans (1) Phase 2 Charles' Woods (12 Lots - Eno Township) Presentation by Eddie Kirk. The property is located on the east side of Dumont Drive (SR 1595) in Eno Township. It is zoned AR and L-ENO-PW and designated Agricultural Residential and Lower Eno Protected Watershed in the Land Use Element of the Comprehensive Plan. The approved Concept Plan involved 52 lots with a total area of 81. 2 acres proposed to be subdivided. This- phase includes 18 . 77 acres . Twelve (12) lots are proposed which average 1 .26 acres in size. All lots would have individual wells and septic tanks. All roads are proposed to be public. Alex Drive will be the main entrance road extending northeast from Phase I . Settlers Trace will extend off Alex Drive to serve the individual lots . In Phase I Alex Drive intersected with Dumont Drive which is off the south side of St . Mary' s Road. The Planning Board approved the Concept Plan for Charles' Woods Subdivision on May 15, 1995 . Phase I of the Preliminary Plan contained 15 lots and was approved by the Board of Commissioners on 1 D RAFTDraft 2/19/96 Planning Board Minutes 25 September 5, 1995 . The Planning Staff recommends approval of the Preliminary Plan for Phase 2 Charles' Woods Subdivision per the Resolution of Approval (an attachment to these minutes on pages ) Barrows asked about the remaining 200 acres. Using the Concept Plan, Kirk indicated the area under discussion and noted that there has been no discussion of development on the remaining acreage. He felt there was the possibility of road extension and development at some future time. Walters asked about the location of the open space. Kirk responded that the open space was in phase 1 and there will be a payment-in-lieu for this phase. Katz asked about the total acres . Kirk determined that 17 .30 is the correct acreage . Barrows noted that St . Mary' s Road is a scenic road and expressed concern with the increase of traffic on such a narrow two-lane road and the desire to protect it as a scenic road. Howie asked about construction in Phase 1 . Kirk responded that Phase 1 is in the recording process, so construction has not yet begun. Howie continued, asking if the developer had given any thought to having a walkway to connect the neighborhood. Kirk responded that there is a pedestrian open space area on the concept plan that will be shown in future phases. He continued that there was open space in Phase 1 of . 97 acres . In later phases the open space and pedestrian easement will be continued. MOTION: Barrows moved approval as recommended by the Planning Staff . Seconded by Reid. VOTE: Unanimous. AGENDA ITEM #10: MATTERS HEARD AT PUBLIC HEARING. (11/27/95) a. Flexible Development/Open Space Proposal MOTION: Waddell moved that the Flexible Development requirement for two plans not apply to minor subdivisions. Further, that the Planning