The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutAgenda - 09-26-2013 - 4ORANGE COUNTY 1 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS ACTION AGENDA ITEM ABSTRACT Meeting Date: September 26, 2013 Action Agenda Item No. 4 SUBJECT: Summary of Ongoing Assessments and Estimates Related to Older Buildings and Facilities for Both School Districts DEPARTMENT: Finance and Administrative PUBLIC HEARING: (Y /N) No Services ATTACHMENT(S): A. Chapel Hill — Carrboro Capital School Facility Study B. Orange County Schools — Facilities Assessment Timeline INFORMATION CONTACT: Clarence G. Grier, 919 - 245 -2450 Todd LoFrese, 919 - 967 -8211 Pam Jones, 919 - 732 -8126 PURPOSE: To discuss the ongoing assessments of capital facility needs for older schools in both the Chapel Hill — Carrboro City Schools ( CHCCS) and Orange County Schools (OCS) Districts. BACKGROUND: Over the past year, both school districts have discussed with the County /Schools Collaboration Work group and their respective Boards of Education the growing need to address repairs and upgrades for older school buildings and facilities. CHCCS has conducted an assessment of their older schools and facilities prepared by Mosley Associates. CHCCS assessment of their older school estimates and capital needs estimates potential repairs and upgrades will range from $52 million (low end) to $170 million (all encompassing). Orange County Schools has just begun their assessment of the capital facility's needs. Based on Average Daily Membership (ADM) percentage, a preliminary estimate for Orange County Schools could range between $20 million (low end) to $68 million (upper end). Orange County's Assessment will be provided later in the year. FINANCIAL IMPACT: There is not a financial impact with information being provided. There will be a financial impact in future years as decisions are made to proceed with funding to address older facilities. RECOMMENDATION(S): The Manager recommends that the Boards accept the information and provide feedback and direction to staff. 2 HMEL HILL J U ORO SC Date: September 18, 2013 To: Allison Chambers, Budget Technician From: Todd LoFrese, Assistant Superintendent for Support Services Re: Information for the Joint Boards Meeting Attachment A On the September 26, Joint Boards meeting there is an agenda item related to our facilities study of older schools. Attached please find a copy of a PowerPoint presentation that is scheduled to be presented to the Chapel Hill - Carrboro City Schools Board on September 19, 2013. This presentation includes some general information about the study process, a review of historical financial information, a summary of findings, three examples of needs and potential projects, and a financial summary of the needs across our older schools. The presentation concludes with some recommendations for next steps. Staff will be present at the Joint Boards meeting on September 26, 2013 to answer questions about our progress. Attachment A 3 HMEL HILL- II R Board of Education Agenda Abstract Meeting Date: September 19, 2013 Agenda Type: Work Session Agenda Item #: 5b Subject: Facility Study Presentation Division: Support Services Department: Support Services Person Todd LoFrese, Assistant Feedback Responsible: Superintendent for Support Services Requested From: Previous Work Session Yes No Date Previous Discussion and Action Yes No Date Attachment(s): PowerPoint PURPOSE: To inform the Board of the findings from the study. BACKGROUND: At the September 19, 2013 Board of Education meeting, administration and representatives from Moseley Architects will present summarized findings from the facility study of our ten oldest facilities. As you know we conducted the study with the intention of assessing the physical and educational needs of each schools included in the study and to establish a plan to address the needed improvements through maintenance and capital projects. The schools and locations studied included, Carrboro Elementary, Ephesus Elementary, Estes Hills Elementary, Frank Porter Graham Elementary, Glenwood Elementary, Seawell Elementary, Phillips Middle, Culbreth Middle, Chapel Hill High, and Lincoln Center. The assessment was also conducted to identify code and life safety concerns, accessibility limitations, environmental issues, mechanical and electrical deficiencies, and site constraints. While each school's needs are unique, there were many commonalities across all the schools included in the study. These general observations and needs are listed below: • Many buildings 50 -60+ years old • Most buildings are in need of significant interior and exterior physical repair • Many facilities need complete HVAC and lighting replacements E • Most buildings are lacking necessary support spaces for program delivery and require additions • Many are campus style facilities which are inefficient and more difficult to secure • Many will require ADA and life safety code upgrades • Many campuses are relying on temporary facilities that are also in need of significant repair We also have developed multiple approaches to make the necessary and recommended improvements along with the associated cost estimates for each approach. In some cases, the facility needs are so great that we question the value of making repairs and additions and instead, suggest building replacements. Our Board presentation will include more details such as a review of findings, an explanation of possible approaches to addressing the facility needs, and recommended next steps. FINANCIAL IMPACT: PERSONNEL IMPACT: RECOMMENDATION: RESOLUTION: 0 I WEL HILL- ARRBORO ,tz C ITY SCHOOLS 10 School Facility Study September 19, 2013 MOSELEYARCHITECTS CHAPEL HILL- 6 6 \C �.� SCHOOLS Presentation A genda • Assessment Purpose and Scope • Assessment Process • Facility and Funding History • Key Findings Examples • Summary Costs • SAPFO Impact • Recommendations and Next Steps MDSE LEYAIC H ITECTS W I EL HILL - �Ro Faci I ities Assessment SCHOOLS Purpose Assess the physical and educational needs of the district's 10 oldest facilities to determine required repairs and maintenance and what is necessary to bring each school to the minimum student capacity as established by the Orange County School Construction Standards. Scope 1) Carrboro Elementary 2) Ephesus Elementary 3) Estes Hills Elementary 4) FP Graham Elementary 5) Glenwood Elementary MOSELEYAf CH ITECTS 6) Seawell Elementary 7) Culbreth MS 8) Phillips MS 9) Chapel Hill HS 10) Lincoln Center L HILL- .. . LWI'SCHOOLS � L Faci I ities Assessment: Process Surveys by a team of architects and engineers to identify: — Building code issues and life safety improvements — Accessibility limitations — Environmental issues — Mechanical and electrical deficiencies —Site constraints School staff and SIT members completed questioners identifying their facility issues of concern. School sizes /capacities were compared to DPI and OC Standards and concept plans and costs (Options 1, 2, &3) were developed for: — Repairs and renovations to existing facilities — Additions to address capacity and programmatic needs — Deconstruction /replacement of facilities that have exceeded their useful life MOSELEYAf CH ITECTS EL HILL - AR B RO CITY SCHOOL Facility Assessment 10 Schools and Facilities Surveyed 40 to 60+ Years of Age School /Facility Year Opened Square Footage • Lincoln Center 1950 72,932 sf • Glenwood Elementary 1952 55,372 sf • Carrboro Elementary 1957 61,562 sf • Estes Hills Elementary 1958 57,989 sf • FP Graham Elementary 1963 68,513 sf • Phillips Middle 1962 109,498 sf • Chapel Hill High 1966 254,551 sf • Culbreth Middle 1969 108,058 sf • Seawell Elementary 1969 58,629 sf • Ephesus Elementary 1972 73,096 sf Tota 1 920,200 sf 2012/13 Enrollment ✓ 920,200 SF represents 46% of all District square footage ✓ 6,042 enrollment represents 50% of all District enrollment MOSELEYAf CH ITECTS I ;I*. 575 566 513 642 1,360 693 703 482 6,042 011 HAPEL HILL - AR B R CITY SCHOOLS Facility History: School /Facility Carrboro Elementary Ephesus Elementary Estes Hills Elementary Glenwood Elementary FP Graham Elementary McDougle Elementary Scroggs Elementary Seawell Elementary McDougle Middle Chapel Hill High East Chapel Hill High Lincoln Center District Totals M OSE LEYAI C H ITECTS Mobile Units 1 7 2 5 2 2 2 6 2 14 8 3 54 Mobile Classrooms Square Footage 730 sf 6,144 sf 1,690 sf 4,608 sf 1,824 sf 1,920 sf 1,920 sf 5,760 sf 1,920 sf 13,440 sf 7,680 sf 2,880 sf 50,516 sf wRBOROFunding History: Capital InvestmentiPlan CIP Facility Investments for all school buildings — excluding Technology Past 10 Years 2003/04 through 2012 -13 $26,636,605 In addition to annual Pay As You Go Funds, $26,636,605 includes; 1. $8,600,000 Alternative Financing for Older Schools in FY 2004/05, 05/06, 06/07,07/08 2. $4,630,000 Qualified School Construction Bonds (QSCB) in FY 2011/12, 12/13 3. $475,000 Article 46 Sales Tax in FY 2011/12, 2012/13 2013 -23 Capital Investment Plan budgets $20,442,700 for all school buildings. MOSELEYARCHITECTS CHAPEL HILL- 6 %-CARRBORO Mok (31 Y SCHOOLS Funding History Last 2 approved Bonds 2001 Bond - $27,600,000 $12,800,000 Carrboro High School (partial funding) $12,800,000 Rashkis Elementary School $ 2,000,000 CHHS HVAC Replacement Project 1997 Bond - $24,000,000 $ 3,000,000 ECHHS Phase II $18,000,000 Smith Middle School $ 3,000,000 Older Schools MDSE LEYAIC H ITECTS CHAPEL H1LL- AT111DO11O 13 &C iT v[scHOOL s General Findings • Significant interior and exterior physical repairs required • Complete HVAC and lighting replacements • Insufficient support spaces for program delivery • Campus style facilities are inefficient and more difficult to secure • ADA and life safety code upgrades • Many campuses are relying on temporary facilities that are also in need of significant repair III[ SELEY IBCHITE T W EL HILL- MOSELEYARCHITECTS 11DOIlO 14 ��HOO s Key Findings ESTES HILLS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL AGING INFASTRUCTURE CAMPUS SECURITY & MONITORING ADA EGRESS ISSUES LIGHTING & IT W C EL HILL - RBIO SCFEooL Option 1 ESTES HILLS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 15 Option 1 consists of a "laundry list" of items that need to be fixed, renovated or remediated. These items similar to repairs included on the Capital Improvement Plan. This option will not increase capacity. TOTAL PROJECT COST: $3,472,125 (Low) to $4,085,441 (High) MOSELEYAf CH ITECTS EL HILL - AR B RO C IT Y SCFEooL LEGEND T Nr&aOGTeP"WLPiA ■ WA, LrirlCG 2 M�w a .ra � Irnrl.s �s•.!� rs•:r..rwsa�sa ■ �aLan+wvtL.o-■rwrLwuer ro�paw+w.+c ■ �v� i rwuw i+lr.+ta+r:Ir w �T r �ra..a..aae�..w.n.ncwi.n+ it .R.I..�r.T 4! AYI W a+lal ra \• ■ ��Gr. V4la1P Iw'W ■ pr'w*KRNb■+' � I�WY.6 L�U0[ICJu • roa+wLMrolYw rOYltlr -.AGIN wInIrLtN 09V.'ra:C.14 a prva''V MICn[Er+'S'ary . VJrL+i WY14l- 'JFrRaaV • bLMFIL l LLldp■Y n MIILYG4'LL�Wa nc+r N11M 4 1�.[■4Ylf�O r irlp.ykwM1 {l�Irllwllp MOSELEYARCHITECTS Option 1 16 ESTES HILLS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL r :ter sal.. try. rLi 1998' 1■1^ +i-- ---- a-��-- MOSELEYARCHITECTS 11tl CUi It 7� />toe�ns�v *cwka� .,-.4 YOln6 4b (/:TJIOiili �F]luTrrrlr `•' -[04 1957 1986 1 r r r w �J `` II iR K r� J .- 1957 Ir i� -� ESTES HILLS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL W C EL HILL - RBIO SCFEooL Option 2 MOSELEYA CHITECTS 17 ESTES HILLS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Option 2 consists of adding small additions that will increase the existing school's student capacity. All mobile units have been eliminated. This option also includes the renovation of existing buildings from Option 1. This option provides a 15 -20 year solution. TOTAL PROJECT COST: $8,236,599 (Low) to $9,643,994 (High) New square footage = 20,361 sf Total campus square footage including new addition = 76,630 sf Increased capacity to 585 by adding 58 seats W C EL HILL - BOIO SCFEooL Option 2 MOSELEYARCHITECTS 18 ESTES HILLS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL W C EL HILL - RBIO SCFEooL Option 3 ESTES HILLS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL W.11 Option 3 includes the deconstruction of existing buildings on the campus that require excessive renovation and have exceeded their useable life. Larger additions are added in this option to not only replace the buildings that have been deconstructed but increase the student capacity. This option provides a 50+ year solution. TOTAL PROJECT COST: $13,358,710 (Low) to $16,715,364 (High) New square footage = 43,050 sf Total campus square footage including new addition = 84,572 sf Increased capacity to 585 by adding 58 seats MOSELEYAf CH ITECTS EL HILL ARBOIO CITY SCFEooL Option 3 MOSELEYARCHITECTS 20 ESTES HILLS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL EL HILL - AR B RO C IT Y scFEooL MOSELEYARCHITECTS Key Findings 21 CHAPEL HILL HIGH SCHOOL ENTRANCE ACCESSIBILITY v AGING OF FACILITY WATER INFILTRATION r REPLACING AGING MECHANICAL SYSTEMS GRADING & DRAINAGE CHAPEL HILL- 6 %-CARRBORO Option 1 CHAPEL HILL HIGH SCHOOL 22 Option 1 consists of a "laundry list" of items that need to be fixed, renovated or remediated. These items similar to repairs included on the Capital Improvement Plan. This option will not increase capacity. TOTAL PROJECT COST: $10,771,282 (Low) to $12,247,920 (High) MDSE LEYAIC H ITECTS EL HILL - AR B RO C IT Y SCFEooL MOSELEYARCHITECTS Option 1 23 CHAPEL HILL HIGH SCHOOL CHAPEL HILL HIGH SCHCO_ FIRST LEVEL ears t+!:tiac ^w .— I�IC�V�TCM1i90 aEMOvar�NtrpC • n s i ... a LJ o r • � i w iipq w Mai ■■ • m w . s • w „ -� w � YY air aaY •w [N1 it i i p.ry ti4� ■ +r7 N , i R •s wwr f r . R w [�sr ■ } cwie es i+ J.! w iN 1m! �p nil 7i IN w s+ 10 7 Me 403 13 R " , xs ua �x ur R• . . \ 1 Be �� e � w � w aw • 3t t1 3i _ y. � LI .1 w nir rEI1QY/,igN 1Y11�i Im Rboam MOSELEYARCHITECTS ,x[M am[sex v11N a mi v"�olm;rm f.re eon.. WYELF-. r..0 0 CMS s� M rbR1W1w �OrO�ii � r : r J w w u ,ON .eacnOw w41R R� w 7300 rw 0, M � IrF] No mmm a� e�w r LEGEND verso• M wir.r6J �w4 �� r EL HILL- M S E LEYAI C H IT2FCTS RRBIO A • �� Option C 1 CHAPEL HILL HIGH SCHOOL CHAPEL HILL HIGH SCHOOL SECOM LEVEL ! ! ! ! i KhIWA.94V 1or3 , l I MO ALtOf ON MQSELEYARCHiTECTS jMtwj!i 11n!!IR W WbInA mblbUkUr7fx r Wrgasr�v� +Uglvaaar +aniiur�rtseou MAW" MEND 1 "a ! W C EL HILL - RBIO SCFEooL Option 2 CHAPEL HILL HIGH SCHOOL 25 Option 2 consists of adding small additions that will increase the existing school's student capacity. This option also includes the renovation of existing buildings from Option 1. This option provides a 15 -20 year solution. TOTAL PROJECT COST: $16,982,344 (Low) to $19,494,159 (High) Additional square footage = 26,543sf Total campus square footage including new addition = 267,654sf Increased capacity to 1625 by adding 105 seats MOSELEYAf CH ITECTS EL HILL ARBOIO CITY SCFEooL Option 2 MOSELEYARCHIT2�CTS CHAPEL HILL HIGH SCHOOL HAPEL HILL - ARRB R CITY SCHOOLS Option 3 MOSELEYARCH�TECTS CHAPEL HILL HIGH SCHOOL Option 3 includes the deconstruction of existing buildings on the campus that require excessive renovation and have exceeded their useable life. Larger additions are added in this option to not only replace the buildings that have been deconstructed but increase the student capacity. This option provides a 50+ year solution. TOTAL PROJECT COST: $22,537,891 (Low) to $37,144,826 (High) New square footage = 50,540sf Total campus square footage including new addition = 291,651 sf Increased capacity to 1625 by adding 105 seats W C EL HILL - BOIO SCFEooL Option 3 CHAPEL HILL HIGH SCHOOL M SELEYARCHITE TS 28 MOSEL EYARC H I TECTS OPTION 3 kwEL HILL- MOSELEYARCHITECTS RBORO 29 SCHOOL$ Key Findings r - Z. INSUFFICIENT LAYOUT LINCOLN CENTER MOISTURE ISSUES ala LACK OF ADAQUATE PARKING AGING MECHANICAL UNITS CHAPEL HILL - ARRRO Option 1 LINCOLN CENTER MOSELEYARCHITE T 30 Option 1 consists of a "laundry list" of items that need to be fixed, renovated or remediated. These items similar to repairs included on the Capital Improvement Plan. TOTAL PROJECT COST: $2,455,171 (Low) to $3,013,834 (High) CHAPEL HILL - ARRRO ■ L LEGEND . +�.rwu.r.w.r,e,Y.rrrrlTt rwrn.Ka ..�� ni vrtw sYH ya Wl'I�IWh MJW. urw'wwlr� �� - saw...srtru.rwu.l• w w...0 � o.n..o.rm '.�iw1Nw�IM1dr1YY48rt u revs l�.nnwrs Y hMQf1/GYC. ,. r r��s•w •. r4 `[.:, m 12rYS[A.�P'l.Ap4� rrR�` � �U4 wciM.�ir'Y].[r rIXKh_i141F{[+�4P1�+[�O[Vw !� �4GCCM.4 Rl0\Y� .IXi+OMl1[TMM2nT9MMVrMMiitiy] a 11PM�Wr�l0,1 NY ...�� vL4ak Mn+b .' WFI/R Y M1iMlsa.tl •rm�+bibM eKYn ;+NA'A]LLZW F',wL ''tie'�na va®a•lui� Y M1Y4Y #1�[vh�:. l4 it M 41Wc.l�n�rro a:a+•YCCwwws w zwMaf .f w+�twrr�.sa�asalr '�•arwrawrl�cwianmr M r�sq..n u+:cr*�'�angwr�r -n+r3 �Y/�ClMSVII ..e�y[awla�.aowrra.uw�wao.. rxel. � ��`N.lM�Gr V.Ci1,94wrP`{Y� w �a.rn Y+�.n mr v Y.l4�el MIl�rFlrlllYrflWl �'JOr*. M- OIF+• =iwF.P 4 Yna MlekwallaF MOri4[+Mr�.iC11 Y IIC[rwf��M'a Y �eprrsre �o-t Y M!r rMti[K.INrw� Iri,M MOSS LEYARCHTECTS =G%Vm wR VRai! WaogJ�.X""K4r:Lr 1p. Option 1 LINCOLN CENTER uhr1rEw40E- WiJV4c ■ ■s MOSELEYARCHITECTS 31 .r L2 ■; ■ 63 ®s m 5 Moo v a � 1 H I I 16i tM . ■ d. LINCOLN CENTER MAIN ELILL.MG ■ slat PHOEND( ACADEMY 1a CHAPEL HILL - ARRRO Option 2 LINCOLN CENTER MOSELEYA CHITECTS 32 Option 2 consists of deconstructing the existing Lincoln Center and building a new two -story Central Office at this location that will provide the necessary space, parking, and professional development space. TOTAL PROJECT COST: $6,740,000(Low) to $8,425,000(High) EL HILL - AR B RO C IT Y SCFEooL Aq y 4' ■ a aa• R y 1 r OR MOSELEYARCHITECTS Option 2 33 LINCOLN CENTER �. 4 _ � + ti ► f' 3 1 • 4 %} .' MOSELEYARCHiTECTS QRT.O1 t TIM MONS GROUP -" cKCCS run.rr� srwr . �.�nmr rir�o a¢aWC i� i.r •} CHAPEL HILL - ARRB TIO 34 6L MIL CITY SCHOOLS Option 3 LINCOLN CENTER Option 3 consists of renovating the existing Lincoln Center for an educational facility and building a new Central Office on a different property that will provide the necessary space, parking, and professional development space. TOTAL PROJECT COST: $13,,744,,835 (Low) to $15..896..140 (High) HVEL HILL- MCASELEYARCHITE T ARRBO 35 'QTY SCHOOLS Option 3 LINCOLN CENTER Lek u 'yy, ti ' IW AL F� MMELEYARCHITECTS OPTION 3 TIMMONS GROUP - . "l;GV FAC&rVnMDy W (3EL HILL - S 1, BOIO scoop Base Level Repair of Deficiencies School Option 1 IMMARY REPORT 36 Option 1 Base Level Repair deficiencies Option 2 Inc. Capacity and Capacity plus Major Replacement SF Added Increase Capacity Increase Option 2 of Buildings in Option 3 Option 2 SF Added Option 3 Total Total New SF Carrboro Elementary 4,173,286 13,549,536 52 28,850 22,146,930 60,600 Ephesus elementary 3,567,347 9,496,744 137 22,836 15,543,912 22,836 Estes Hills Elementary 4,085,441 9,643,994 58 20,361 16,715,364 43,050 FP Graham Elementary 4,752,434 10,099,412 47 19,586 20,321,427 53,628 Glenwood Elementary 3,804,774 12,376,974 162 31,400 26,820,437 80,000 Seawell Elementary 3,547,864 8,814,034 119 19,290 16,059,588 43,761 Culbreth Middle 6,749,600 10,093,850 see note below 12,250 - - Phillips Middle 6,149,660 10,269,230 52 15,090 - - CHHS 12,247,920 19,494,159 105 26,543 37,144,826 50,540 Lincoln Center 3,013,834 8,425,000 33,700 15,896,140 33,700 $ 52,092,160.00 $ 112,262,933.00 732 229,906 $ 170,648,624.00 388,115 Notes: - Implementation of Option 2 will remove 27 elementary school mobile units and provide a dedicated Pre -K space at each school. - Culbreth MS calculations do not include the addition of 14,749 square feet for Science Lab that will result in 104 increase in capacity. MOSELEYAf H ITEGTS W C EL HILL- moo Impact on SAPFO projections School Level Current Capacity SAPFO Threshold Projected New School Date Project Cost Elementary 51829 61120 2021 -22 $ 35,476,053 * Middle 21944 31150 2019 -20 $ 42,913,749 High 3,875 4,263 2020 -21 $ 19,743,948 Total 121648 131533 $ 9811331750 *Includes Culbreth Science Expansion School Level Potential Capacity Potential SAPFO Threshold Potential New School Date Project Cost Elementary 61404 61724 Beyond 10 Yrs N/A * Middle 21966 31206 2021 -22 $ 47,168,013 High 3,980 4,378 2022 -23 $ 21,742,339 Total 131350 141308 $ 6819101352 MOSELEYAf H ITEGTS CHAPEL H1LL- ARRBORO 8 \CI.Y SCHVOL$ Items and Questions to Resof e • School Specifics, (ie ... Option 1, 2, or 3) • Phasing and Swing Space • Lincoln Center and Central Office Needs • Timing and Funding MDSE LEYAIC H ITECTS CHAPEL HILL - ARRRO ,� Su ort Services Recommendat'i' ons pp • Form a working group to meet with school principals and key staff ... daytime work with consultants • Approve planning money • Invite OC and OCS to participate in the process • Develop a list of recommended projects by location • Develop a rough phasing plan /approach • Coordinate with Orange County for funding options • Communicate our needs to our stakeholders OSE LEYAIC H ITECTS H Questions and Feedback El It, Attachment B 41 Orange County Schools Facilities Assessment Timeline Over the past year, Orange County Schools (OCS) has undertaken three important studies to comprehensively reflect the District's facility needs for the foreseeable future. They are as follows: December 2012 —OCS received Facilities Assessment Report from the Department of Public Instruction • This report identified areas where maintenance and capital expenditures would be needed, but did not provide specific work details nor cost estimates. • Maintenance items have been addressed. April 2013— Acknowledging the ever- increasing need to ensure safety in our schools to the extent practicable, OCS commissioned Safe Havens International to conduct a facilities assessment focusing on safety and risk management practices in schools and District buildings. • This excellent report holistically explored the effect facilities have on safety and recommended several modifications. Funding constraints have prohibited facility modifications or the addition of system controls to address many of these recommendations. • The report further identified work practices that should be changed to promote a safer environment in the schools. Those recommendations are currently being implemented within current funding. October 2013 —The Board of Education will retain a consultant to conduct a facilities assessment which builds on the findings of the other reports and adds the needed detail and analysis for capital facility costs. The timeline for completion of this report is as follows: • Facilities Assessment Proposal due: 12:00 noon EDT October 3, 2013 • Anticipated date of award: No later than October 28, 2013 • Preliminary report requested no later than December 31, 2013 • Final report requested no later than January 31, 2014 This full body of work should provide information upon which the Orange County Board of Education can confidently base future capital decisions.