Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda - 10-21-1997 - 10b 1 ORANGECOUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS ACTION AGENDA ITEM ABSTRACT Meeting Date: October 21, 1997 Action Agenda Item# 10-L SUBJECT: Update of Master Recreation and Parks Master Plan- Charge to Work Group DEPARTMENT: PLANNING PUBLIC HEARING: Yes_X_No BUDGET AMENDMENT REQUIRED: _Yes_X No ATTACHMENT(S): INFORMATION CONTACT: Chronology of Events Mary Willis - Extension 2583 Charge to Work Group List of Appointments TELEPHONE NUMBERS Commissioners' Goal/Plan of Action Hillsborough 732-8181 5/21/97 BOCC Agenda Item- Durham 688-7331 Recreation and Parks Coordination Report Mebane 227-2031 Chapel Hill 967-9251 PURPOSE: To consider a charge to the Master Recreation and Parks Plan Work Group to update and modify the Master Recreation and Parks Plan. BACKGROUND: The current Orange County Master Recreation and Parks Plan was adopted in 1989. Update of the Plan was included in the Commissioners' Goals for 1997-98. The update was initially warranted on the basis of changing condition, and new issues which had arisen since the Plan was first adopted. One specific issue which was to be addressed in the update was the joint siting of park and school facilities. A related initiative began at a September 1994 Assembly of Governments meeting at which recreation funding equity and coordination issues were discussed. Review of those issues ultimately resulted in several recommendations, including a recommendation that the Master Recreation and Parks Plan be modified to be a joint long-range capital facilities plan for Orange County,Carrboro and Chapel Hill. The attached chronology summarizes actions related to creating a Work Group specific to the Plan update as a Commissioner' goal, as well as actions related to the review initiated by the Assembly of Governments. 2 .r Also attached is a charge to the work group which revises the purpose of the Plan as recommended by the Managers of Orange County,Carrboro and Chapel Hill. A list of appointments to the work group is also provided. Chapel Hill has not yet designated its appointee. It is also recommended that the University of North Carolina be represented on the work group. If the charge is approved with UNC representation, then staff will contact the University for designation of an appointee. After the charge is finalized, the work group will convene to begin work on the Plan update. RECOMMENDATION: The Administration recommends adoption of the attached charge, including appointments, and revision to the purpose of the Master Recreation and Parks Plan to be a joint long-range capital facilities plan for Orange County, Carrboro and Chapel Hill. 3 CHRONOLOGY OF EVENTS RELATING TO UPDATE OF ORANGE COUNTY MASTER RECREATION AND PARKS PLAN (Note: Events shown in boldface type relate directly to the update of the Orange County Recreation and Parks Master Plan. Events shown in regular type relate to actions following the September 1994 Assembly of Governments meeting.) 7/88 The Master Recreation and Parks Plan was adopted as an element of the Orange County Comprehensive Plan. 9/94 The Assembly of Governments discussed funding equity and service coordination for recreation and park needs. 10/94-3/95 A process for discussing County-wide recreation needs was developed and finalized. 5/95 The Recreation and Parks Work Group was formed,consisting of elected officials and Recreation&Parks staff from the municipalities and County. 12/95 A work group report,"Recreation and Parks Issues in Orange County,NC"was finalized,and included the following recommendations: • Standardization of recreation sections of land use ordinances across jurisdictions, particularly with respect to the standards used to define recreation and parks requirements; • Employment of joint siting, designing, and management of school and park sites across jurisdiction boundaries;and • Use of public/private partnerships across jurisdictions 1/96 The work group report was distributed to governmental jurisdictions. 2/96 The work group report was presented at an Assembly of Governments meeting. Staff was requested to develop a draft plan of action to address the recommendations of the report. 2/96 A report prepared by the Orange County Planning Department which included proposed amendments to the recreation payment-in-lieu provisions in the Subdivision Regulations was presented at the quarterly public hearing. Among the recommendations contained in the report was that consideration be given to updating the Master Recreation and Parks Plan. The rationale for this recommendation was that the Plan was eight years old,and issues had arisen which suggested an update was warranted. Those issues included the following: 4 • The relationship between existing and proposed school sites, and proposed parks; • The development of "small area plans" in the northern portions of Chapel Hill and Carrboro and the impact, if any, that proposed park sites in those areas would have on the need for "County" facilities; • The utilization of landfill and reservoir sites, both existing and proposed, as possible recreation sites; • The discussion of strategies for preserving natural and cultural resources through open space design, including the relationship of these resources to active and passive recreational pursuits; and • The evolution of a Parks and Recreation Advisory Board for the Town of Hillsborough and the role the Town would play in the provision of recreational facilities. 5/5/97 A draft Charge for a work group including the school boards and municipalities was approved by.the Board of Commissioners. The purpose of the work group was to prepare an update of the Orange County Master Recreation and Parks Plan. 5/21/97 The Managers of Orange County, Carrboro and Chapel Hill presented a report to the Board of Commissioners with a plan of action to address the recommendations of the work group report. The plan of action included the following recommendation: "Modify the purpose of the Orange County Recreation and Parks Master Plan to be a joint long-range capital facility plan for Carrboro, Chapel Hill and Orange County." 8/97 The Commissioner's goals for fiscal year 1997-98 were adopted. The goals included modifying the purpose of the Orange County Recreation and Parks Master Plan to be a joint capital facilities plan for Carrboro,Chapel Hill and Orange County. 9/97 A letter was sent from the Orange County Manager to the Carrboro and Chapel Hill Managers requesting confirmation of interest in developing a joint capital facilities for recreation and parks,and designation of appointees to work group. 9/97 A response was received from Carrboro concerning appointees to the work group. 10/21/97 A revised work group charge will be submitted to the Board of Commissioners for adoption. 5 ti ORANGE COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS CHARGE TO RECREATION AND PARKS WORK GROUP October 21, 1997 (Note- Text in bold italics indicates revisions to the draft charge which was adopted on March S, 1997 to change the purpose of the plan to include use as a tong-range capital facilities plan for Orange County, Carrboro and Chapel Hilt: BACKGROUND At the February, 1996 public hearing, proposed amendments to the recreation payment-in-lieu provisions were presented. Among the recommendations contained in the report was the suggestion that consideration be given to updating the Master Recreation and Parks Plan. The rationale for this recommendation was that the Plan was eight years old, and issues had arisen which suggested an update was warranted. Those issues included the following: • The relationship between existing and proposed school sites,and proposed parks; • The development of "small area plans"in the northern portions of Chapel Hill and Carrboro and the impact,if any,that proposed park sites in those areas would have on the need for"County"facilities; • The utilization of landfill and reservoir sites,both existing and proposed,as possible recreation sites; • The discussion of strategies for preserving natural and cultural resources through open space design, including the relationship of these resources to active and passive recreational pursuits;and • The evolution of a Parks and Recreation Advisory Board for the Town of Hillsborough and the role the Town would play in the provision of recreational facilities. In September, 1994,Assembly of Governments discussed funding equity and service coordination for recreation and park needs. A Work Group was appointed and in December 1995,finalized a report entitled "Recreation and Parks Issues in Orange County,NC". The report included the following recommendations: • Standardization of recreation sections of land use ordinances across jurisdictions,particularly with respect to the standards used to define recreation and parks requirements; • Employment of joint siting, designing, and management of school and park sites across jurisdiction boundaries;and • Use of public/private partnerships across jurisdictions. 6. In February, 1996 the Work group report was presented to the Assembly of Governments Staff was requested to develop a draft plan of action to address the recommendations of the report. In May, 1997, Managers of Orange County, Carrboro and Chapel Hill presented a plan of action, which included the following recommendation, to Board of Commissioners. "Modify the purpose of the Orange County Recreation and Parks Master Plan to be a joint long-range capital facility plan for Carrboro, Chapel Hill and Orange County." The charge to the Master Recreation and Parks Plan Work Group includes updating the Plan as well as modfying its purpose to be a joint long-range capital plan per the Managers'recommendation. CHARGE The charge to the Master Recreation and Parks Plan Work Group is to update and modify the Master Recreation and Parks Plan to be a joint long-range capital facilities plan for Orange County, Carrboro and Chapel Hill and to present the new Plan at the October 8, 1998 Joint Planning Area public hearing. -- The update and modification of the Master Recreation and Parks Plan shall include, but not be limited to,the following: 1) Update of inventory of recreational facilities and opportunities; 2) Update of needs assessment; 3) Development of standards used to determine recreation facility and acreage needs,and standards for park design. Standards should be developed for use by Orange County, as well as Hillsborough,Chapel Hill and Carrboro; 4) Utilization of joint siting, designing, and management of school and park sites across jurisdictions; 5) Development of tangible, realistic parkland acquisition and development goals; 6) Reassessment of service area boundaries for payment in-lieu-of dedication; and 7) Reassessment of dedication provisions related to greenways in the Joint Planning Area. The Plan update and modification shall emphasize coordination between the County and its municipalities and school boards in determining recreation needs, targeting areas for future park sites, and providing for the joint siting of school and park facilities. 7 WORK GROUP APPOINTMENTS Orange County Commissioner Margaret Brown Orange County Recreation and Parks Advisory Council Patrick Mulkey Ricky Hill Orange County Planning Board Leo Allison Renee Price Town of Hillsborough Wendy Olson Town of Chapel Hill Town of Carrboro Hank Anderson Orange County School Board Keith Cook Carrboro-Chapel Hill School Board Bea Hughes Werner OWASA Kathryn Kalb Duke University Wendy Weiher University of North Carolina Staff assistance. will be provided by the Orange County, Carrboro and Chapel Hill Planning Departments and Recreation and Parks Departments. 8 Adopted 5/14/96 Revised 6/9/97 RECREATION&PARKS GOAL: (1)PREPARE JOINT MASTER RECREATION&PARKS FOR ORANGE COUNTY; AND(2)UPDATE PARKLAND DEDICATION STANDARDS. :.... :....:.::.:....:........:..:.:.... .. . :..:. ... ...,. ...... .: This goal involves updating the Master Recreation&Parks Plan adopted in 1988.Issues have arisen which suggest an update is needed, and a recent report to the Assembly of Governments cited the need for standardization of recreation and park standards,and the siting,design,and management of school and park sites across jurisdictional lines.As follow-up to the Assembly of Governments meeting,the Managers of Orange County,Chapel Hill,and Carrboro presented a report to their respective governing boards which included a recommendation that the Master Recreation&Parks Plan be modified to be a joint long-range capital facility plan for the three jurisdictions. Related to this, the Board of Commissioners asked staff to review the current dedication/payment in-lieu provisions to determine if the dedication requirements were sufficient to generate needed parkland. BACKGROUND&OBJECTIVES At the February, 1996 public hearing, proposed amendments to the.recreation Aedication/payment-in-lieu provisions were presented. Among the recommendations contained in the'repott was the suggestion that consideration be. givea_to updating the Master Recreation & Parks Plan. The, rationale for this recommendation was that-the Plan was eight years old, and issues had arisen which suggested an update was warranted,including the following: • The relationship between existing and proposed school sites,and proposed parks; • The development of"small area plans" in the northem portions of Chapel'Hill and Carrboro and the impact,if any,that proposed park sites in those areas would have on the need for"County"facilities; • The utilization of landfill and reservoir sites,both existing and proposed,as possible recreation sites; • The discussion of strategies for preserving natural and cultural resources through open space design, including the relationship of these resources to active and passive recreational pursuits;and v. • The evolution of a Recreation& Parks Advisory Board for the Town of Hillsborough and the role the Town would play in the provision of recreational facilities. At about the same time,a report was presented to the Assembly of Governments by the Recreation&Parks Work Group,a group comprised of elected officials and Recreation& Parks staff from the municipalities and County. The report focused on"Recreation& Park Issues in Orange County"and recommended three specific actions,including: • Standardization of recreation sections of land use ordinances across jurisdictions, particularly with respect to the standards used to define recreation and parks requirements; f 9 Employment of joint siting, designing, and management of school and park sites across jurisdiction- particularly with respect to planning all new school sites to include park facilities and existing schools improved with such amenities where mutually beneficial; and • Using public/private partnerships across jurisdictions. Sabsequent to the Assembly of Governments meeting,the Managers of Orange County,Chapel Hill, mW Carrboro presented a report to their respective governing boards which included a reesnseendation that the Master Recreation&Parks Plan be modified to be a joint long-range capital facility plan for the three jurisdictions. Related to this, the Board of Commissioners asked staff to review lira current dedication/payment-in-lien provisions to determine if the dedication requirements wars snl5cient to generate needed parkland. 1 Given dw above events and associated recommendations,a Plan of Action has been prepared through which to implement the goals of updating the Master Recreation & Parks Plan and reviewing the current dedieadon/payment in-lieu provisions. RESOURCE REQUIREMENTS Completion of this goal would involve the following commitment of existing County staff resources: Planning Director Recreation&Parks Director Planner IEUCurrent Planning Supervisor GIS Project Coordinator Given the "joint" nature of the Master Plan update, the commitment of staff resources from the Towns of Chapel Hill and Carrboro will be sought, including staff from the Town's Planning, and Recreation and Parks Departments. Staff will compile data from time sheets concerning staff hours expended and costs associated with completion of this goal. Monthly reports will be distributed to County Manager, Advisory Boards, and Board of Commissioners outlining monthly/cumulative staff hours and costs assigned to this project. 10 't elk C6 C6 go a a a- zo 0 z z .......... ... . Go 00 ch C6 O tv r_ C6 00 vi to z a L's a — > d6 > r6 CL rara 79 3% S s t) C6** 0 A 0 Le C6 .0 r.6 AR V C6 0 b A > m C6.0 W -'s I 0 Io 0 4r 3: *0 .a .4 .0 -0 20 C6 L C6 > a --% a < e 2 Q A i = ?: Z :s 0 > [M > 41, > -0 -5 -0 0 s a. 9 �r �, 11 - 00 - -- fi A E U C y Q .0 L Q� Ny z a b ZsUo c an '04 z w o ••Qi C oa •a V o O T a Z jX a d = > C � a aG02 OOG F r' ag Ddb c 0 8 aU ci do $� aaot,,� • a i:T ^, .N•: ..3 .;. y..•>;r.;T.S::•}•:v.;k';•a'%>.}:r:<; i"`,.'tom`.•-•'':::+'•�;,���t•F Q :;`;.yf;�y'•. :��'�n'tt:•$e;.orrt::,.3.+•:�{.'i",'w�•�'oF.r}.,.`•:{:',•:- t•'.;::`r;: ::�ry+i; •• {tYv+`�{••'k'}�•. :}.: M12;`.. M'rkri h'}:y::•::tiS:rv''''-�: Q •<kiyy.:rf.;..;�?:µ:3`. }r 4#•'�5'2:"ri,�'...•.,�:•:•,�,�;"+ ;`•:•{2-.•. ...,..•:v. � :;;....rv,Y..y}.T„v,r :-3c;.::• .rx4- r:rr�;;r:2;y'v,.> i`iM1i? 3i ';ti4..{:},o�{R:. r.�v-4:tr`•::F. {•r':`.',#�,+'a!;�:e�' 'o-`•vi.- 'tiri:{:t:.:.;.T::•:::• yr r.:•_ -gz .•r' t. .{r k:. .z::TT.,}a}.T >i +�:ra�3.fi't} '.tA}'4t::e% a..i:•q' .S}yc:�"'`}�:.. y � � `' �. .AMT �•.�. •. .k•• to c,L• x•.�v.. ..,;yr,•.;, icy �} #'::<�n::Jh?�Tv':;.. r"•.',%::�x?'T' '•+;}:::.i'Cw•.�,�j,'-''•%?>'•k`�• Y:.'':,'.{;>':i't:$s �w C �i :.•.,•`•i:y,:•.r ter'; ..;..;.'�•� in:•'i:3:5;,�`�'S � r,::{i:; •;::;:;r}:;;t;:.''2'•��:.':JL;y.,-,±a`•,t, a:.�yi�. .�.•„rY�".�,:.;,:;;n•y :•;.�:.{-,: . .f;o?'�; `rY•ii• •xx`'•�` t;..;. .,,; '1+�.±'•:>+c."f%;'+.'i : j�5!til+.it.::.�.�. Y' yr,+,:;Trr;•:S:{T::n.}'r: • O :.iii+:{ :'�:> 4 - y.(+;;+•":•.:xi.'+/:i:.r:%i'f+i� �A`�}�:Y S` +HS"i .Jii!i+^•`f.•Yi vn' .:::: �'v%.is��%il.,fx?{r$`/j'f,��'T:•T::::/1':w{{� r.�:ol,/t'^i,y:::.. ,!H•r}:.. ' ./ '�!;:!.... ,..f, no- � i. `•i'C _ i<:n� ��:✓:i:r: •b':Caf•'F. .. J.��•rN%' :Y;+i,�%vjT :ice;•}: .T: PROVIDED AS ATTACHMENT TO 10/23/97 AGENDA ITEM ORANGE COUNTY 12 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS Action Agenda Item No. jo_q ACTION AGENDA ITEM ABSTRACT Meeting Date: May 21, 1997 SUBJECT: Recreation and Parks Coordination Report DEPARTMENT: Manager's Office PUBLIC HEARING: (Y/N) BUDGET AMENDMENT: (YfIN) No ATTACHMENT(S): INFORMATION CONTACT: Report Albert T. Kittrell, Assistant County Manager TELEPHONE NUMBERS: - - est. 2300 Hillsborough 732-8181 Chapel Hill 968-4501 Durham 688-7331 Mebane 227-2031 PURPOSE: To receive the Recreation and Parks Coordination Report. BACKGROUND: In September of 1994 the Orange County Assembly of Governments met and discussed funding equity and service coordination issues among Orange County governmental jurisdictions regarding Recreation and Parks needs. They recommended-that the staffs of the local governments make recommendations to their governing bodies about opportunities for joint planning and capital improvements; and that the two school systems be involved in the process. From October 1994 to March 1995 a proposed process for discussing county-wide recreation and parks services was developed, amended and finalized by staffs of the governmental jurisdictions. In May 1995, the governing bodies approved a process and appointed representatives to a Recreation and Parks Work Group. The charge of the Work Group was to consider how the governing bodies can provide the best recreation and parks services to the most citizens at the least cost. A report of the Work Group entitled"Recreation and Parks Issues in Orange County, NC was finalized in December of 1995 and distributed to the governmental jurisdictions in January 1996. At the February 29, 1996 meeting of the Assembly of Governments, the report was submitted by the Work Group. Staff was requested to bring back a drag plan of action to address the recommendations of the report. 13 On February 18, 1997 County staff presented to the Board an update indicating the following tasks has been completed: • ensured that school systems and local governments adopted a resolution supporting the concept of joint use, site, location and management of recreation and parks facilities among local government agencies in Orange County (resolutions are attached). • met with a representative from the Institute of Government to discuss the opportunities for joint planning, use and management of recreation facilities and services among municipalities, county and school system. • reviewed management and joint use agreements between other municipal and county governments in the state. Staff also indicated the Managers of Carrboro, Chapel Hill and Orange County would finalize a recreation and parks coordination report by May 1997. The report is attached and includes recommendations by the Managers for all three jurisdictions to consider. RECOMMENDATION(S): The Manager recommends that the Board receive the report as information, consider the recommendations made by the Managers, and to provide direction to the Manager on implementation of these recommendations in the near future. t I MORANDUiYI -` TO: Board of Orange County Commissioners 14 Carrboro Board of Aldermen Qhapel Hill Town Council FROivI Robert W. Morgan, Carrboro Town Manager W. Calvin Horton, Chapel Hill Town Manager John M. Link, Jr., Orange County Manager SUBJECT: Recreation and Park Coordination Report DATE: May 4, 1997 SUPY IARY The attached report;prepared in outline form, represents efforts over the past several months to meet requests from the above mentioned jurisdictions, in addition to the Town of Hillsborough and the two school systems within Orange County. All jurisdictions passed resolutions supporting improved delivery of recreation and park services and combined school/park initiatives. This report addresses both needs. BACKGROUND The Orange County Assembly of Governments has discussed these issues twice. The first discussion led to the creation of a Recreation and Parks Work Group that was a mixture of elected officials, citizen advisory board members, and staff. The Work Group developed a report entitled"Recreation and Parks Issues in Orange County,N.C.". After this report was presented to the Assembly of Governments the Managers were asked to provide a report on possible actions that could be implemented addressing the issues brought forth in the initial report.. Afterwards various resolutions were adopted further delineating the issues to be addressed by a report from the Managers. The attached report ,addresses the directives provided within the resolutions. DISCUSSION The demand for recreation and parks services and facilities has increased across all of Orange County. Increasing demand for these services is the result of population growth. It is generally accepted that financial resources within each of the jurisdictions are inadequate to meet all demand. Therefore, the report addresses new ways to make improvements in meeting demands. School/park recommendations are included because not only are the facilities and sites integrally connected, but also population growth and dependence upon the same scarce financial resources directly affect both services. f RECOMMENDATIONS 15 That the Managers be authorized to implement the following recommendations: • Modify the purpose of the Orange County"Master Recreation and Park Plan" to be a joint long range capital facility plan for Carrboro, Chapel Hill, and Orange County, intended for adoption by each jurisdiction. Adjust staffing and advisory groups as appropriate for the broader purpose. • Direct staff to begin planning for joint program coordination and conducting a countywide needs assessment for recreation programming. • Following completion of the joint long range capital facilities plan, begin identifying 1 opportunities for consolidation of programs on an incremental basis. • Develop for consideration of the governmental and school jurisdictions a proposed process to develop a formal plan for joint use and site selection of future school and park sites. It is desirable that these plans lead to the adoption of a formal agreement (similar to the one in use in Wake County) on school facility use and that such agreements would guide all future site acquisition of school and parkland. AjG-12-1997 15:38 BOCC/tVt4AGER 91 96443004 P.02/04 Proposed 6197 ' RECREATION AND PARKS SERVICES COORDINATION 16 GOAL: To coordinate recreation and parks programming services with the towns of Chapd laili,Carrboro,Hillsborough and the Chapel HUYCarrboro and Orange County Schools. OBJECTIM To determine the feasibility of coordinating recreation and parks services among the County,Towns,and School Systems. STATUS REPORT PARKS A,xnL ,CREAM WORK(!&=: A work grvuEp was formed to consider opportunities for joint cooperative efforts. The governing bodies of Carrboro,Chapel Hill,Orange County,and the two school systems appointed representatives to serve on this work group.(Ihe work group membership list is available upon request) 1. To consider how the governing bodies can provide the best park and recreation services to the most people at the least cost. 2. To repast periodically,but not less often than annually,to each of the governing bodies. RiMAL1I4M The first meeting of the Parks and Recreation Work Group was held on June 28, 1995 at the Chapel Frill Town Council Conference Room. Hanle Anderson of the Canrboro Board of Aldermen was appointed to serve as Chair_ FIRST FOCUS: As recommended,the Work Group established a sub-committee to explore areas of coordination and joint planning for recreation services and park facilities between the local governments and the school systems and a sub-coiamitfloe to consider developing a public-private association of recreation providers m Orange County. The Work Group also established a third sub-committee to compare Fark-Stasu�daandLocai Ordivancea, Sub-Committem A School/Govemmad Coordination (Waidtttf,Iichas-wetter,Parka,Wilkerson) Sntl-Jones B. Publib ivate Recreation Providers (Croy+dw.Pavgo,Feinstein) Staff—Loveman