Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda - 08-04-1997 - 8p f 1 ORANGECOUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS ACTION AGENDA ITEM ABSTRACT Meeting Date August 4. 1997 Action Agenda Item# 8' SUBJECT: ZONING ORDINANCE TEXT AMENDMENT Article 10.3 Off-street Parking Design Standards DEPARTMENT: PLANNING& INSPECTIONS PUBLIC HEARING: Yes_X—No BUDGET AMENDMENT REQUIRED: Yes X_No ATTACHMENT(S): INFORMATION CONTACT: Emily Cameron Extension 2580 Proposed Amendment TELEPHONE NUMBERS: 5/27/97 Public Hearing Minutes Hillsborough - 732-8181 7/2/97 Draft Planning Board Minutes Durham - 688-7331 Mebane - 227-2031 Chapel Hill - 967-9251/968-4501 PURPOSE: Consideration of a proposed amendment to the Zoning Ordinance to correct a discrepancy between Article 10.3, Off-street Parking Design Standards, and Article 12.4.1, Required Landscaping. BACKGROUND: Article 10.3 of the Zoning Ordinance contains the design standards for off-street parking. The setback required between new parking areas and side and rear property lines is five(5)feet.Article 12.4.1c requires a ten-foot landscape area between new parking and all property lines for nonresidential and multi-family residential development. The proposed amendment will correct the conflicting requirements by increasing the setback in Article 10.3 from five(5)to ten(10)feet. The proposed amendment was presented at the May 27 public hearing No comments were received from the public,the Planning Board or the Board of Commissioners. The proposal was referred to the Planning Board for a recommendation to be returned no sooner than August 4, 1997. On July 2 the Planning Board voted unanimously to approve the proposed amendment. RECOMMENDATION: The Administration recommends that the public hearing be closed and that the proposed Zoning Ordinance text amendment be approved. 2- PROPOSED ORDINANCE AMENDMENT [DST] REFERENCE: ZONING ORDINANCE Article 10.3 Off-Street Parking Design Standards ORIGIN OF AMENDMENT: x Staff Planning Board BOCC Public Other: EXPECTED PUBLIC HEARING DATE: May 27, 1997 Purpose of Amendment: To correct a discrepancy in the Zoning Ordinance between Article 10.3, Off-Street Parking Design Standards, and Article 12.4.1,Required Landscaping. Impacts/Issues: Article 10.3 of the Zoning Ordinance contains the design standards for off-street parking. The setback required between new parking areas and side and rear property lines is five(5) feet. Article 12.4.1 c requires a ten-foot landscape area between new parking and all property lines for nonresidential and multi-family residential development. The proposed amendment will correct the conflicting requirements by increasing the setback in Article 10.3 to ten(10) feet. Existing and proposed ordinance text:(Proposed text is underlined) Article 10.3 Off-Street Parking Design Standards All required off-street parking shall meet the following requirements: i) New parking areas shall observe a 10-foot setback from all road right-of-way and a — 5 feed from all side and rear property lines. Such setbacks shall be landscaped iu accordance with Article 12.4 of this ordinance. Ordinance Review Committee: 4/22197 Planning Board: 7/z/97 BOCC: �04 612-7/9-7 PLI&-LC HEderA , M WVTES 3 A motion was made by Commission Carey, seconded by Commission Brown, to refer this item to the 2 Planning Board to be returned to the Board of Commissioners no sooner than August 4, 1997. 3 VOTE: UNANIMOUS 4 05 b) SetbacJm for Parlattq 6 1) Article 10.3 Off-Street Parking 7 This item was presented by Planner Emily Cameron in order to receive citizen 8 comment on a proposed amendment to the Zoning Orotnance to correct a discrepancy between Article 10.3, Off- 9 street Parldng Design Standards, and Article 12.4.1, Required Landscaping, Article 10.3 of the Zoning Ordinance 10 contains the design standards for off-street parking. The setback required between new parking areas and side and 11 rear property lines is five(5)fleet. Article 12.4.1c requite a ter*-foot landscape area between new parking and all 12 property lines for nonresidential and multi-family residential development The proposed amendment will correct the 13 concocting requirements by increasing the setback in Article 10.3 from five(5)to ten(10)feet 14 15 COMMENTS AND/OR KST10 a FROM THE BOARD OF CO MISSIO E ! None 16 17 COMMENTS AND/OR QUESTIONS PROM THE PLANNING BOARD: None. 18 19 COMMENTS AND/OR QUESTIONS FROM CITIZENS: None. 20 21 A motion was made by Conxnissioner Gordon. seconded by Commissioner Halkiotis,to refer this item to 22 the Planning Board to be returned to the Board of COMVT iSsioners no sooner than August 4, 1997. 23 VOTE: UNANIMOUS 24 25 c) Expiration of Planning Board Tem1s 26 1) Article 224 Planting Board Tenure 27 This item was presented by Planner Mary WNtis in order to receive citizen comment on a 28 pm9osed amendment to change ttte month in which Planning Board temps expire from February to March. On April 29 6, 1992 the Board of Commissioners adopted a Resolution for the Appointment and Orientation Process for Boards 30 mid Commission& Eleven procedures were included in the Resolution,including a requirement that appointment 31 expiration dates coincide with quarter ending dates. Article 224 of the Zoning Ordinance cutrerttiy states that 32 Planning Board temps expire in February. The proposed amendment dtarges tM month of expiration to March. 33 34 Qn�NM ANOMM QUEEMNS FROM THE BOARD OF CO M LS IONS - None 35 38 None. 37 38 cOWICM ANMR OJESMJIS FROM CMEENSLI None. 39 40 A rtoft wss made by Commissioner Gordon.seconded by Carrttrtsiorrer Halkic",to refer this item to 41 the Planning Board to be returned to the Board of Commissioners no sooner than August 4. 1997. 42 VOTE UNANIMOUS 43 44 AJ.4URNHOf 45 46 VM no ftrrew sort oft Chair Crowtiter adloumed the meeting. The neat regubr meeting of ttte Orange 47 County Board of Corvonissiorwu 3 will be a Budget Presentation and Pubic Hearing on Thursday. May 29, 1997. 48 This meetirnp wtil be held in the Superior Court Room,Margaret Lane Hftbcmugh. NC. 49 50 Respectfully subntiteed. 51 52 Kathy Baker. Dewy CWk TCTAL P.06 7 12lgl Ptomnincq Boad6 MMOO+ s 'Y 4 c)Schedule of Land Use Buffers(page 3.2.8) d)Maximum Permitted Sound Levels(page 2.4.3) The proposed amendment was presented for public hearing on May 27, 1997. Commissioner Gordon requested that the Tables be revised to make the proposed changes more clear. Revisions have been made in response to those comments. There were no citizen comments. The Planning Staff recommends approval of the proposed amendment. MOTION: Brooks moved approval as recommended by the Planning Staff. Seconded by Hoecke. VOTE: Unanimous. (2) Article 10.3 Off-Street Parking Presentation by Mary Willis. This item is for consideration of a proposed amendment to the Zoning Ordinance to correct a discrepancy between Article 10.3,Off-street Parking Design Standards,and Article 12.4.1,Required Landscaping. Article 10.3 of the Zoning Ordinance contains the design standards for off- street parking. The setback required between new parking areas and side and rear property lines is five(5)feet. Article 12.4.1c requires a ten-foot landscape area between new parking and all property lines for nonresidential and multi-family residential development. The proposed amendment will correct the conflicting requirements by increasing the setback in Article 10.3 from five(5)to ten(10)feet. The proposed amendment was presented at the May 27 public hearing. No comments were received from the public,the Planning Board or the Board of Commissioners. The proposal was referred to the Planning Board for a recommendation to be returned no sooner than August 4, 1997. The Planning Staff recommends approval of the proposed text amendment. MOTION: Searles moved approval as recommended by the Planning Staff. Seconded by Selkirk. VOTE: Unanimous. (3) Article 2.2.4 Planning Board Tenure Presentation by Mary Willis. This item is to consider a proposed amendment to change the month in which Planning Board terms expire from February to March. On April 6, 1992,the Board of Commissioners adopted a Resolution for the Appointment and Orientation Process for Boards and Commissions. Eleven procedures were included in the Resolution,including a requirement that appointment expiration dates coincide with quarter ending dates. Article