Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda - 08-04-1997 - 8j 1 ' ORANGECOUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS ACTION AGENDA ITEM ABSTRACT Meeting Date: August 4. 1997 Action Agenda Item#—I--' _ SUBJECT: OXBOW CROSSING ON MORGAN CREEK-- PRELIMINARY PLAN ACTION BY: August 16, 1997 DEPARTMENT: PLANNING PUBLIC HEARING: Yes_X—No BUDGET AMENDMENT REQUIRED: Yes_X No ATTACHMENT(S): INFORMATION CONTACT: Jim Hinkley EXTENSION: 2584 Resolution of Approval Application TELEPHONE NUMBERS: Vicinity Maps Hillsborough- 732-8181 Fiscal Impact Analysis Durham - 688-7331 Planning Board Minutes of 7-2-97 Mebane -227-2031 Chapel Hill - 968-4501 PURPOSE: Consideration of the Preliminary Plat for Oxbow Crossing on Morgan Creek Major Subdivision. BACKGROUND: The proposed 27-lot subdivision is located at the southeast corner of Dairyland Road and Bethel-Hickory Grove Church Road. The proposed development is composed of three existing parcels of record (Tax Map Nos. 7.110..6, 7, & 8), ranging in size from 22 to 38 acres. (See attached map.) The total tract consists of 97.11 acres. The proposal is skirted on the east by Morgan Creek which flows directly into University Lake. The creek was designated as a greenway in the Joint Planning Area Land Use Plan and as a wildlife corridor in the 1988 Inventory of the Natural Areas and Wildlife Habitats of Orange County, N.C. (See attached Preliminary Plat.) The property is zoned RB(UNIV-PW)--Rural Buffer (University Lake Protected Watershed). (Flexible Development regulations do not apply in the Rural Buffer.) All lots will be served by new public roads, with driveways limited to interior streets only. No lot will have direct access to Bethel-Hickory Grove Church Road. Current access to the existing residence on lot#12 will be abandoned, and a new access will be provided to Oxbow Crossing Road. 2 s Lots #8, #9, & #10 and lots #22 & #23 will share joint driveways as shown on the preliminary plan. Documents for shared driveways have been prepared for recordation. The calculated stream buffer width adjacent to Morgan Creek ranges from 70 to 155 feet beyond the 100-year floodplain line, depending on vegetative cover type and percent-of-slope calculations. Including the floodplain, the stream buffer line lies 200 feet from the creek to the rear of lot #2 just south of Dairyland Road. The floodplain and buffer widen to 450 feet in the broad meander behind lot #5 where public dedicated passive recreation land belongs to Orange County. In the Concept Plan for the subdivision, the applicant proposed public and private open space adjacent to Morgan Creek. This space is designated as a greenway location in the Joint Planning Area Land Use Plan. Orange County holds passive recreation easements and owns properties along Morgan Creek which were acquired during the subdivision of Durham Estates and Laurel Springs. These are shown on the Preliminary Plan. Greenway dedication was required along Morgan Creek for adjacent subdivisions. The Preliminary Plan illustrates these other recreation dedications acquired by the County during subdivision of tracts adjacent to the creek on the east side. In the Durham Estates Subdivision, a 60-foot public greenway easement was dedicated in 1990 and deeded to the County to provide access from Dairyland Road to a 2.6-acre parcel located on both sides of the creek. In the Laurel Springs Subdivision, a 60-foot public greenway easement--to the south of the abovementioned County-owned land--was dedicated during development in 1986. This easement runs for about 500 feet along both sides of the creek and then solely on the east side. The proposed subdivision lies within the Chapel Hill District Park Service Area. The applicant proposed dedication of 1.3-acres in a 22-foot wide private open space corridor to Orange County for public recreation as required by Section IV-B-7-b-2 of the Subdivision Regulations. The Recreation and Parks Advisory Council considered the applicant's proposal to dedicate recreation land at its March 4, 1997 meeting. It recommended that payment be made in lieu because previous dedications in Durham Estates and Laurel Springs had already created a continuous greenway along the entire length of Morgan Creek from Dairyland Road to the southern boundary of the property. The calculated amount will be $10,920 (minutes attached). The preliminary plan delineates a 100-meter wide (328 feet) wildlife corridor on the west side of Morgan Creek, encompassing from 1/3 to 2/a of the area of each of the nine five-acre lots lying between Oxbow Crossing Road and the southwestern bank of Morgan Creek. The creek is a major link in the County's wildlife corridor network, connecting three natural areas: Pickards Mountain to the northwest, Calvander Bluff and Bottom just to the southeast, and McCauley's Mountain at University Lake farther to the southeast. The wildlife corridor would be protected from building construction, fences, and other physical obstructions, clearing of vegetation, and other activities which could inhibit its function as a wildlife habitat and corridor linking with other 3 " habitats identified in the 1988 Inventory of the Natural Areas and Wildlife Habitats of Orange County. The Planning Board approved the Concept Plan on March 6, 1997. The Planning Board recommended the Preliminary Plan on July 2, 1997. The Board voted 11 in favor with one abstention (Brooks, whose firm will be marketing the property). RECOMMENDATION: The Administration recommends approval of the Preliminary Plan for Oxbow Crossing on Morgan Creek per the attached resolution. 4 RESOLUTION OF THE ORANGE COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Date August 4, 1997 Name of Subdivision Oxbow Crossing on Morgan Creek Owner/Applicant John D. Hartle The Board of County Commissioners hereby approves Oxbow Crossing on Morgan Creek Subdivision preliminary plat, dated May 6, 1997, and containing 27 lots, subject to fulfillment of requirements specified herein. All roads in the subdivision shall be irrevocably dedicated to the general public and be constructed to standards of the North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT). The approval of this resolution authorizes and directs the Orange County Manager to accept for the County, and on behalf of the public generally, the offer of dedication of Oxbow Crossing Road, Oconee Court, and Galax Court. This acceptance of dedication to the general public shall be without maintenance responsibility. These roads shall be maintained by the owner/applicant until such time as they are accepted for maintenance by NCDOT or some other governmental body. Before the Final Plat of Oxbow Crossing on Morgan Creek Subdivision can be recorded: A. Sewage Disposal 1. Each residential lot shall contain adequate septic disposal and repair areas, approved by the Orange County Division of Environmental Health. 2. Disclosure that the septic system location may restrict the size and location of improvements shall be included in a document describing development restrictions to be recorded concurrently with the Final Plat. The document shall also disclose that information regarding the tentative location of septic systems is available from the Division of Environmental Health. B. Roads and Access 1. Oxbow Crossing Road shall be constructed to NCDOT standards within a 50-foot right-of-way, and Oconee and Galax Courts shall be constructed to NCDOT standards within 45-foot rights-of-way. Construction shall be inspected and approved by NCDOT. OR 5 A letter of credit or escrow agreement or other security shall be submitted to secure construction of Oxbow Crossing Road and Oconee and Galax Courts to NCDOT standards. An estimate of the construction cost must be prepared by a certified/licensed engineer or grading contractor and submitted to the Orange County Planning Department. The financial guarantee must reflect 110 percent of that estimate and be issued by an accredited financial institution licensed to do business in North Carolina. The document describing development restrictions to be recorded with the Final Plat shall state that the financial guarantee will not be released until the road construction has been inspected and approved by NCDOT. 2. An erosion control plan for construction of the roads shall be submitted by the applicant to the Orange County Erosion Control Division for review and approval. 3. Approved street name signs shall be erected at all intersections, as required in Section IV-B-3-c-12 of the Orange County Subdivision Regulations. The applicant shall submit evidence that signs are in place, or a receipt for purchase of signs shall be submitted to the Planning Department. 4. Access to all lots shall be from interior streets only.No lots shall have direct driveway access onto Bethel-Hickory Grove Church Road. C. Land Use Buffers and Landscaping 1. Landscaping shall be installed or preserved as indicated on the approved landscape plan, and must be inspected and approved by the Planning Department. 2. Provisions for protection of existing trees as shown on the approved landscape plan shall be included in a document describing development restrictions and requirements to be prepared by Planning Staff and recorded concurrently with the Final Plat. D. Drainage 1. Impervious surface data, pursuant to Article 6.23 of the Zoning Ordinance, shall be included in the development restrictions and requirements document to be prepared by Planning Staff and recorded concurrently with the Final Plat. 2. Drainage easements as required shall be located following review and approval of the Erosion Control Plan. 3. A Stream buffer as proposed on the Preliminary Plat shall be contained entirely within the open space area indicated on the Preliminary Plan. The width will range from 70 to 155 feet beyond the 100-year flood line, depending upon e 6 vegetative cover types and percent-of-slope calculations as set forth in Article 6.23.7 of the Zoning Ordinance. 4. Drainage culverts shall be sized and located as required by NCDOT and the Erosion Control Officer. E. Parkland 1. Cash in the amount of$10,920 ($455 X 24 lots) shall be paid to Orange County as payment in lieu of parkland dedication. There are 24 new lots to be created in the 27-lot subdivision. 2. Open space to be shown on the Final Plat shall be in the form of easements for recreation/open space use by residents of the subdivision. F. Miscellaneous 1. The Final Plat shall contain a title block and vicinity map in accordance with Section V-D-2 and V-D-3 of the Subdivision Regulations. 2. The following easements shall be shown on the plat: a. Drainage easements as required above in¶D.2. b. Power easements as shown on the Preliminary Plat. 3. Minimum building setbacks shall be stated on the plat,and in a document describing development restrictions and requirements to be prepared by Planning Staff and recorded concurrently with the Final Plat. G. Certifications 1. A Certificate of Survey and Accuracy signed by a registered Land Surveyor shall be notarized on the face of the Final Plat. 2. A Certificate of Declaration and Maintenance, as provided in Section V-D-6-b of the Subdivision Regulations, signed by the landowner and developer shall be on the face of the plat and included in a document describing development restrictions to be recorded concurrently with the Final Plat. 3. NCDOT shall certify that Oxbow Crossing Road, Oconee Court, and Galax Court have been constructed to State standards or that construction plans have been approved. 4. A Certificate of Approval shall be signed by the Planning Department. i 7 Signature of Applicant Clerk to the Board accept the above listed conditions of subdivision approval, and acknowledge that each must be met prior to recordation of the final plat. Applicant Date f 8 APPLICATION FOR PRELIMINARY PLAN APPROVAL MAJOR SUBDIVISION 8/93 j ORANGE COUNTY DATE: ` PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT (INK ONLY) SUBDIVISION NAME: L�')XBozj LOCATION: CD�Y)��2 �� ��Tt/GC hiC,i✓D/?� �I��yE �f/�,Q Af�l/2y�flr►C �°Q OWNER/DEVELOPER: ADDRESS: oZ fT TELEPHONE NO.: /y Z �l D O Z 7 7/0 AGENT/CONTACT: \7 �tl YM/2L4 TELEPHONE NO.: 0(07 7 A. SUMMARY INFORMATION: /// !� Orange County Tax Msp Block� Lot(s) 7• Township C 111IPf L Zoning District(a): Total Number of Acres: Phases: Total Number of Lots: �_Average Lot Size: <- Minimum Lot Size: AG Number/Type of Structures: (existing) E.p S ? (proposed) 2-LO Lineal Feet in Streets: 3100 Acres in Open Spsce:2 �,lpli _ W/4,0 4r�_ Water Supply: Public (specify) Community X Individual Wastewater Disposal: Public (specify) Community ly Individual School District: C C Fire'District: ASS General Land Uses in Area: i C, Ckt C Critical Areas:�� stream/drainageways DU flood prone areas W watershed (specify) e2eaL historic"sites other (explain) M Ole! L 2 Grp/ Is the property to be subdivided currently under 'farm use value taxation'1 Yes (' No_. If 'yes', please contact the Orange County Tax Office. Subdivision of the property may require payment of deferred taxes under 'farm use value taxation'. B. All plats must be submitted on sheet no smaller than one inch equals two-hundred feet 0' 200') and no larger than one inch equals twenty feet (1' 20') and must contain the follow)ng'information: ji subdivision name zoning of tract and adjacent L7 name &address of owner(s) properties name & address of subdivider building setback lines by notation (if other then owner$ or typical lot layout name of surveyor, engineer, location and width of existing and C landscape architect or architect, proposed easements (drainage,. address,registration I and seal / utilities, roads, etc.) > , (tide) Preliminary Plan 1/ existing, proposed and adjoining ? { scale, north arrow, rights-of-weV y (V 1.7- daft Gncluding revision dates) and street names land state r= 44 "In township,tax map4lock-iat numbers. Lineal feet of road .61 w references centerlines and approximate '� ✓ � Parent Parcel Identification 0 acreage of now street rights-of- cu c ✓ deed book and page r of property. way . `++ to be subdivided ' existing and proposed utilities, boundary described Y�th bearings including type, sizes, hydrants, S W and distances valves, manholes�a�. total acreage of the tract end' ✓<? existing and propoe�o 4arbe; Y m acreage of loti, including and culverts,including U a excluding area within rights-of- sizes and grades N way - location and width of alleys, l control corner sidewalks, bike lanes, transit systems, and bus stops (please complete reverse side) � � 9 ✓ i proposed lot lines with dimensions tYolcal street cross-sections ano �- lot & block numbers intersection details including ► — phasing lines design and width of traveiwev and a _yam topography at ten foot (10) 1 / shoulders ^� intervals ✓ 4h-7matal At naa3am and general o water bodies, streams, floodway curve data (public roads) a) end floodplains ✓ _; centerline radius on all proposed V) ` stream buffers � streets location and size of parcels I✓ Permanent features such as V) U dedicated for public use, buildings, cemeteries, historic m recreational use or reserved in landmarks o common, with purpose noted """'''> adjoining lot layout names of u ✓' %> >": impervious surface data (if located adjoining property owners. If in water supply watershed) subdivided, subdivision plat name, C) _ vicinity map showing general plat book & page number, and a to location of subdivision with streets perimeter lot numbers. o and roads identified by State road location and size of lots of U number and name restricted development potential -14 ✓ landscaping and buffer and notation on plat regarding U a� M requirements same U (4) township, corporate and extra- ✓ '`` stormweter detention and/or territorial planning,jurisdiction lines retention sites and undisturbed which cross the property areas for infiltration purposes (if located in water supply watershed) C. OTHER SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS 1. Twenty-five (25) copies of the preliminary plat. vZ. One full size copy of an Orange County Tax map Iwith tax parcels involved clearly marked in pencil). 3. Where municipal or OWASA sewer is not available, a copy of the Preliminary Plat indicating Health Department soils analysis approval/denial for each lot shown thereon. �4. Where a private road is proposed a written statement by the applicant or his/her authorized representative which sets forth the justification for a private road (see Section IV-8-3-d-1 of the Orange County Subdivision Regulations). 5. Auxiliary documents, in drab form, prepared in accordance with Section VL of.this Ordinance which assure completion end/or maintenance of improvements required by this Ordinance. Such documents may include, but not be limited to, a private road maintenance <Cra Ment, and articles of incorporation and restrictive covenants pertaining to a homeowner's association. These documents may be required as necessary as evidence that the ordinance requirements are being met. 4-)0 8. Fee - *369.00 plus $5.00 per lot 0 fee for preliminary and final plat). 7. If the subdivision contains 10 lots or more the following information $half be submitted with the application:• - a. Number of'ysan to buildout. b. Number of houses to be built during ea" e year to buildout. C. Average price of houses including lots for each year to buildout �oQl/L2 I, the applican ( hereby certify that the foregoing application is complete and occur a. AP C �^'S/SIG TURE OW IG A E DATE DATE _T FEES: Amount 60$-. o o Oats Paid 'S- f 3- 17 Receipt # 12S 13 4- ° 10 OLD I swx roods if RD- FOR N / LAKE FA J RD. RM o MAC .o IT-Yi NA vas Nam ti White C q4 cl l snv � w 4 OXBOW CROSSING ON MORGAN Major Subdivision CREEK Scale v=40009, N 11 \sac fu 1U 25 254 58 4744 \ �� 5 88AC 2.5 3981 96 C io 31 .�C �, h 1.16 r l 1 1 _ 4772 62 �� 376 25C 02 ( 3746 1 — .. A �s . - ......ice............:iiii::. s _ �• '� 'NOLL 0760' AK Qy :i::::: i.:: :::::::::::::::::: 26 1 2.04 — ::: .... .................................... �• ..................... .rdtttE:6tt3i6¢tts:tt;tt?::6sEESEi:s: 2401 29 ...................... T. 6,5 27 . O 2351 6. ..................................... ................ 7272 .......:............................. .. :iii :-i•isi::iii:...:;..::_:.:::.:i::iii::iii.::. . ............................................ ::::::::::::::::::::..:::::::::::::..:.:::::::::..:.: .:::: .::. C. `�? ? :: €sdi`:€€"s€'s's€s€€ i€is:i:'ss€':c€:'i'€s sds€€€'• :": ':::": . .. 7. 40 A C. !C. J sis......i.iiiiiiiiiiiiiiii......iii iiiisiii:isiii: :¢::• . :......:..:...::::::::::::::::::::::::: .::::::::::::::. sii:isiii:tisti< si si':iiitsiiiii.......................... ....................................iisiiiiiiiitiiits:-isi:i:iisiss ......................... :: iii:iiii....................... i o ....«._.........................................................i ......:.................................... oa23 oP/ ..:::::::::::::::: ::::::::::: • 0 =siiiii-iiiisiiiia_i:i .....t ................ is • .. .....:.....:..:..,:. ;............,..:•:::::.:.:..::::::....:::...:...;,. 5.16 AC }+ :.......................:.:_:...:.....:......:.:....:.....: ::::: ::::::: ::::::::::::::�::�::::::::::::_::::::::::�::::::::•::::�:: .................. .:tiiiiisiisiiiisisiisisst:::¢::::::::::::°��siiiisi:. : ::::::::: :•::::::::•::::::•::::•::::::::::::::•::•:::•::i:••:::::::: ::•::::::::::• .:::::::::::::::::::::::::-:::::::::::::::::::•:::::::::::::: CQ .................... :: i::::::i::::::::i::::::::-:i:::i:::::::::r::i: i::::ii::::: : ::::::::::::::::::::::::: is:::::::::::::::::a::•:::::::::: ........................................................................................:...:::: ........... ..:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::............................... !- ......:::::::::«::::::::::::::::::::::::::.......................• ........................................:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: YY:1:........:::::�:::::::: ..».. ....................................................................... ................................................................y.;�.. Twl• .. .......................................................................... �� 1 : «::::::.:::::.::Y:::•'....JI•; I.YYC Ti:::::ii: ::::• ................................................................ .»..............._..................................Y:1•:'Y::.�::-::::::::.air;t 1 .......................................................»....... ........ ..................... • , '1:::::«:«:::::::::::::.............:........YP'Yt:..............::•::'::::.::........... ::�... .................................;............................................ .........:.".. .........................::'::::.........................:.................... i ...... ....' !! i?=:viii?w+wii °.:::::::::::::::::: .•:iE :..... ......... :iiicidiiiiiiiiEfEiiiiii2Fii2iiEiiiiiiici ..Y....................................................... ..... ::::::::-::::::::::::::: ::::::::::::::::: ::::::::::_ .......::::......:::::::::::::::••:•:•:::.................. .:::::. n.......::::::::::::::::::::::::::::.::::::: ....... ........... .............................................................................. iiiiiiiiiiiiiiii iiiii::. .:::::::::::::.... .:::::......:......:.......::.::::::::.::::::.......................... i ................................................. ................. ................................. .... f 1 410 3 � r . ......................................... .:::::::::::::::::::::::. ................................ ` _........ ............................. .......................... :.................._ ... . ...... .................... \ -i:::r•:«ir,.r«:r ................ ....................................... l •:.:rrn:..• '• n :r::::::: ::::::::::::;:::::::::::j . . --j ii�ii................... PH 1 :::•- .................................. ............. .. .. `I 4C' 0 iii G 1 :yi- i 1 .. ::::::::::: ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::�iiiii..ii:iiiiiiiiiiiiii _....... ..:::Y:::. ...... :: 9867 .. .............. .. ....................................................:::::: ... ................................... ' \F9 \ _................ .......................;...................... ...... ..... ... .. .................. ..........:...... y, ................................... �<a::::: .. ........ SEE I I .......... / : ::::ii::-::: /SP# .................. ............................................:.. ....... 4471�. :•:•:::............::.....:::::::• :i::::::i::i isiiiii ............ «:: : :i i LAUREL IN4 .:.:...............................: .................................... .:.:.: \ .................... .. :•::.:.:::::r::::.:::...... ....:..:.... \ ..... ............. ... .... .........«.........«............. ........... G' ................................. :.. i . Q 7433 1 I : :.............. ...:::::: .«::::«::::::::;; :: :::: ::: 6 :::::::::::«:::•:::::::::«« :::........................... :::::::i::::. ................................... .. ....................................... ............ `a1 I yH ................«_............ ..................................... ., .... ............. . IAC. iiiiiiiiiiii :««:::::«:::it!: .•� ..................._............... ::....... AY 4329 ............_.............«... .................................... .........i::::: ................ 17 ssac. «:.......r.....:::: ........:..........._..«.... ... :=::_::: \10 AC. .... ............................. .2026 ...:.:r.«......... ...••.::. .r.............«::...«; .:.. .. i.............:. ••.. �.::Sirir.:«..iii«:::r.. :::i:. \ ....... «...._«..........._:.....t..w... .... . «•: i..i: «z••:::«....;..«r. .....«::::«:...:«:«iii::::: 9A ....i s:Lse?i::e»i«:r.2.e.••�—�f?••..a••—•-:.....z««.zssl��«i�•,'i �� • ...«.. r. IIiiJ?f��aa37 — � � .134! 4.83 NC. «.t:. ::::'z«xn'?::. _. "."isiiii6:««sa«� i.:;;:::. •••�• / OXBOW CROSSING ON MORGAN CREEK Major Subdivision Scale V = 500' q N 12 4 god _ o,• - 00-'r'_`. '�• _°°". to � ,�-�� ' tli Div � r. va' _. y �J. \'aoaC -0`•�,i n.•..,'�1 eL' ..�0 �� - t.. 1 :I / 00 1 I` It o,. V q,4. j9p p ..�� C` rt+• ,t.74 tgJ> I e ry 0 J+ t.•.r. °j Ocone Courttd'Pubic ,,>�1 pV�hLa `..:moo 14C \r `,Qs iF \ J%• 1 1? l ' 00 ^?0 O �- ,*v r r•1 + b, 00 4• - >'- r r t 2Q >ta„ '� r AC` 'rT ! M f"ter '�•7 / rpaa �t,°'gt•y »9`` ; �... _ .7p. _ 'v-•. 4-1 tit �°is,, B ysrl° H° o h y � � •�� m � `'rt"'C�`. C. .;.- � !¢ \, 1 . 91 ey'F t ?ra qs \ •hry so", eGt^',,�9,^,.a,�t� SO 0 1'\ ;uat �Ce1 ...J- v • ;GL\lj a t 0, '1 1 a9 or'° �' Sie �� F Jr Ct ts., _ I 1 4C 1 1. �?y'fJfo - •OJS o?• A " `•J, > 1 w '+ I j +r Q ►e \ r a NO •y ? t, +'.,.yea •� ,��Ontra!u1\, ~ AC,d^� l Y l •\r� 'ir Tn re ?t pJ A ooy4Q \t. v N c 4c ff 000 3 / 2.t�Isy "�. \\�� 7`• !' -:'tom i 1� /_ •► Og oW Oo r (� 'oti�r y �•�f 0t'�,;IC i ' I 08 moo,, s `•. 00 '. 'T '000 r Ss4rr /g •� \ Lsur8 •1 f� t(�i r 1 .j. het ��'e �=='County prop a ,, � '`� �,� -.�i �•�% orange Co my ..4e pre "it �'•< ' n. ,.. _ btic Dedicated ent >� s0�e t /('!+�gy h'•` �� �1 pu waY gagem �'. , ,�� t f.'`• " J, I N A R T 6w pub�icGreen -1 ?- _ , pS5.LIM p At _.:. • ..:��= •E'" tom` XBC� CRC CN MCR dwistOn Mal°f Sib N �p0, ti° SC �„ � i,: 13 FISCAL IMPACT ANALYSIS FOR OXBOW CROSSING SUBDIVISION RESIDENTIAL SERVICE STANDARD APPROACH Prepared by The Orange County Planning Department June, 1997 PROJECT DESCRIPTION Oxbow Crossing is a proposed 27-lot subdivision located on Morgan Creek in Chapel Hill Township. The lots are accessed by 3,500 feet of new public roads (Oxbow Crossing Road, and Oconee and Galax Courts). Oxbow Crossing Road will intersect with the east side of Bethel Hickory Grove Church Road (SR 1104). The current zoning is RB - Rural Buffer(UNIV-PW). The average lot size is 3.36 acres, with individual lots ranging from 2.0 to 5.1 acres Lots will be served by individual septic systems and wells. Project build-out is estimated at three years. Housing units will be constructed at a rate of nine per year beginning in 1998, with completion of the project scheduled for 2001. Units will consist of detached single-family homes, and the applicant estimates the average sales price to be $300,000 including the lot. METHODOLOGY Fiscal impact analysis is a projection of the direct, current, public costs and revenues associated with residential and non residential growth in the jurisdiction in which the growth is taking place. Fiscal impact analysis considers only direct impact in that it projects only the primary costs that will be incurred and the immediate revenues that will be generated. It calculates the financial effect of a planned development or new subdivision by considering the current costs and revenues such a development would generate if it were completed and occupied today. Fiscal impact analysis does not consider the private costs of public action. It is concerned only with public (governmental) costs and revenues. The method used in preparing the fiscal impact analysis is the Service Standard Approach. While only gross expenditures by service category are derived from the Per Capita Method, the Service Standard method determines the total number of additional employees by service function that will be required as a result of growth. This method employs average county government costs per person, average school costs per pupil, an employee to population ratio, and average operating expenses per employee for each service category and school district. The number of new employees are projected and multiplied times the average operating expenses (includes personnel, operating and capital costs) per employee. These average costs are then weighed against per capita and per pupil revenues to project the total net fiscal impact of the development. RESIDENTIAL FISCAL IMPACT TEMPLATE: SERVICE STANDARD METHOD Bureau of Economic& Business Research -University of Florida 14 Modified 4115/97 -Orange County, NC Planning Department SECTION 1 - PROJECT DATA: ENTER THE FOLLOWING DATA FOR EACH PROJECT: PROJECT: Oxbow Crossing TOWNSHIP: _ Chapel Hill CONSTRUCTION PERIOD: Beginning Year. 1998 Ending Year: 2001 Inflativrt�tat�. 250% CHARACTERISTICS OF HOUSEHOLDS: Persons/House:, ENTEK!V BESIDE APPLICABLE SCHOOL DISTRICT BELOW: - 2.56 Children/House: ENTER 1 BESIDE APPLICABLE SCHOOL DISTRICT" " BELOW. 0.63 o NEltiiirty :, 10000°fcR HOME SALES DATA: Average Distribution Number of Sales Price of Units Year Homes (S) by Year 308,0 .3333? 1999 9 300,000 33.33% 20001" � � � Q% 33.33% 2001 0 0 0.00% 2G OZ 0:00%' 2003 0 0 0.00% 2004 0. Or, OOOsfo 2005 0 0 0.00% 20061 _ t 0.00% 2007 0 FO 0.00% SCHOOL DISTRICT DATA: ENTER"1" IN ( ) BESIDE SCHOOL DISTRICT IN WHICH PROJECT IS TO B LOCATED TO GENERATE STUDENT DISTRIBUTION BY SCHOOL TYPE. School District: School Attendance: Orange Courify ( 0 :., ECertentary c ' :.571 Middle School 22% Chapel Hill- errt ( 1 Hig i c o - 21% 15 SECTION 6 - SUMMARY OF PROJECTED DEMOGRAPHIC/FISCAL IMPACTS YEAR 1998 1999 2000' 2001 2002 HOUSING UNITS 9 18 27 27 27 POPULATION 23 46 69 '+ 69 69'' SCHOOL CHILDREN Elementary 3 6 10 10 10` Middle 1 2 4 4 4 High School 1 ! 2 4,' 4 4' TOTAL &, 11 17.' 17 17 COUNTY EMPLOYEES 0:.1 0.25 0.37 0.37 0.37 SCHOOL EMPLOYEES 0,26 0.50 : 01,5 0.75 0.76 TAX BASE($1000) 2700 5468 830+x' 8512 8725 COUNTY BUDGET($) Revenues 25962; 52726 82245 84301 Expenditures 183€3 37707 57974 59423 60909 BALANCE 751 15020 22265':•; 22822 23392' SCHOOL DISTRICT BUDGET($) Revenues 34143' 107129" 109807 112552` Expenditures 3239&ti 66416 10211 5-1 104668 107285 BALANCE 1715)= 3387 5014'' 5139 5268: COMBINED BUDGETS(5) Revenues 80'00, 122530 '1873 192052 .196853 Expenditures 5t?79 104123 16x00$ 164091 168194 BALANCE 9309(,' 27271t`' 27961 28660 YEAR 2003.' 2004 : 2005P 2006 2007'; HOUSING UNITS 27, 27 21 27 27 POPULATION b '" 69 69 69 69 SCHOOL CHILDREN Elementary 1Q ` 10 '1 10 10 Middle 4- 4 4,*j 4 4 High School 4 4r_ 4 4 TOTAL 17 17 17 COUNTY EMPLOYEES 03F 0.37'' 0.371 0.37 0.37 SCHOOL EMPLOYEES 0.75 0.75 ` 0675 0.75 0.76 TAX BASE($1000) 8 9166 93W 9630 9871 ; COUNTY BUDGET(5) Revenues 86409 88569 90783 93053 95379 Expenditures 62432 63992 692; 67232 68913 55 BALANCE 23977 24576 2019' 25821 26466 SCHOOL DISTRICT BUDGET($) Revenues 115366 118250 121217 124237 127343 Expenditures 109967 112716 115534; 118422 121383' BALANCE 5395 5534 5673 5814 5960 COMBINED BUDGETS($) Revenues 201775 206819 211990 ' 217289 222722 Expenditures 172399 176708 181126 185654 190296 BALANCE 29376 30111 30863 31635 32426 SECTION 7 - SUMMARY OF PROJECTED PUBLIC SCHOOL CAPACITY IMPACTS 16 SCHOOL DISTRICT DATA: School District: School Attendance: Orange County NO ) Elementary;School 57% Middle School 22% Chapel Hilt-Carrboro YES High School 21%7,01 YEAR 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 SCHOOL CHILDREN Elementary 3 6 1 } 10 10 Middle 1 2 ,: 4 4 High School 1: 2 4 4 4= TOTAL 11 17 17 YEAR 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 SCHOOL CHILDREN Elementary f�- 10 10 10 Middle 4 4 4 4 4 High School 4 ' 4 4 , 4 4 TOTAL 1�7: 17 1 17 17', SCHOOL CAPACITIES-ALL SCHOOLS CURRENT ENROLLMENT-ALL SCHOOLS Elementary. :E enta `: 3922 Middle 2104 Middle 1897 High School" 26CS Hl lt'.ScIoI 2110 TOTAL 8457 TOTAL 7929 YEAR 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 PROJECTED ENROLLMENT Elementary 3925 3928 39W 3932 3932 Middle 1898x' 1899 19ft1 1901 1901 High School 2111 2112 2114 2114 TOTAL 7$ 7940 7L 7946 7946 YEAR 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 PROJECTED ENROLLMENT Elementary 3932 ' 3932 3932 3932 Middle 1901 1901 190t 1901 1901 High School 2114 2114 2114° 2114 2114 TOTAL 794& 7946 7946 ' 7946 7946 Orahge County Planning Board Minutes July 2 , 1997 17 MOTION: Walters moved approval as recommended by the Planning Staff. Seconded by Price. VOTE: Unanimous. (4) Oxbow Crossing (Chapel Hill Township-27 Lots) Presentation by Jim Hinkley. The proposed subdivision is located at the southeast comer of Dairyland Road and Bethel-Hickory Grove Church Road. The proposed development is composed of three parcels of record ranging in size from 22 to 38 acres. The total tract consists of 97.11 acres. The 27-lot proposal is skirted on the east by Morgan Creek which flows directly into the University Lake Reservoir. The creek has been designated as a greenway in the Joint Planning Area Land Use Plan and as a wildlife corridor in the 1988 Inventory of the Natural Areas and Wildlife Habitats of Orange County. N-C— The property is zoned RB(UNIV-PW)-Rural Buffer(University Lake Protected Watershed). (Flexible Development regulations do not apply in the Rural Buffer.) All lots will be served by new public roads,with driveways limited to interior streets. No lot will have direct access to Bethel-Hickory Grove Church Road. Current access to the existing residence on lot#12 will be abandoned and a new access will be provided to Oxbow Crossing Road. Lots#8,#9,&#10 and lots#22&#23 will share joint driveways as shown on the preliminary plan and documents have been prepared for recordation. The calculated stream buffer width adjacent to Morgan Creek ranges from 70 to 155 feet beyond the 100-year flood line,depending on vegetative cover type and percent-of-slope calculations. Including the floodplain,the stream buffer line lies 200 feet from the creek to the rear of lot#2 just south of Dairyland Road. The floodplain and buffer widen to 450 feet in the broad meander behind lot#5 where publicly dedicated,passive recreation land belongs to Orange County. In the Concept Plan,the applicant proposed public and private open space adjacent to Morgan Creek. This space is designated as a greenway location in the Joint Planning Area Land Use Plan. Orange County holds passive recreation easements and owns properties along Morgan Creek which were acquired during the subdivision of Durham Estates and Laurel Springs. Greenway dedication was required along Morgan Creek for adjacent subdivisions. The applicant proposed dedication of 1.3 acres in a 22-foot wide private open space corridor to Orange County for public recreation as required by Section IV-B-7-b-2 of the Subdivision Regulations. e 18 e The proposed subdivision lies within the Chapel Hill District Park Service Area. The Recreation and Parks Advisory Council considered the applicant's proposal to dedicate recreation land at its March 4, 1997 meeting. It recommended payment-in-lieu because previous dedications in Durham Estates and Laurel Springs have already created a continuous greenway along the entire length of Morgan Creek from Dairyland Road to the southern boundary of the property. The calculated payment will be $10,920. The preliminary plan delineates a 100-meter wide(328 feet)wildlife corridor on the west side of Morgan Creek,encompassing from 1/3 to 2/3 of the area of each of the nine five-acre lots lying between Oxbow Crossing Road and the southwestern bank of Morgan Creek. The creek is a major link in the County's wildlife corridor network connecting three natural areas: Pickard Mountain to the northwest,nearby Calvander Bluff and Bottom just to the southeast,and McCauley's Mountain at University Lake farther to the southeast. The wildlife corridor would be protected from building construction,fences,and other physical obstructions,clearing of vegetation, and other activities which could inhibit its function as a wildlife habitat and corridor linking with other habitats identified in the 1988 Inventory of the Natural Areas and Wildlife Habitats of Orange County. Hinkley noted that, in the Resolution of Approval, under E. Parkland,#2 should read: Open space to be shown on the Final Plat shall be in the form of easements for recreation/open space use by residents of the subdivision. With the one change in the Resolution,the Planning Staff recommends approval of the Preliminary Plan for Oxbow Crossing per the Resolution of Approval(an attachment to these minutes on pages ). Price asked if there would be jurisdictional problems with fire district designation. Hinkley responded that information received from the Fire Marshall did not address this concern. He stated that he would get further information from the Fire Marshall on this concern. Katz asked for clarification of the easement. John Hartley,developer, responded that the easement is a twenty foot trail easement along the creek accessible to the residents of the subdivision. Barrows asked about the creek being designated as a greenway. Collins responded that Morgan Creek was designated as a greenway on the Joint Planning Area Land Use Plan which means that it is a public pedestrian and bicycle trail on the east side. On the side of this development, it is a private easement for the subdivision. MOTION: Katz moved approval as recommended by the Planning Staff. Seconded by Hoecke. VOTE: I 1 in favor. I abstained(Brooks-due to the fact that her firm will be marketing the property). AGENDA ITEM##9: ITEMS HEARD AT PUBLIC HEARING(5/27/97)