HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda - 03-05-1997 - 9a 1
ORANGECOUNTY
BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
ACTION AGENDA ITEM ABSTRACT
Meeting Date: March 5, 1997
Action Agenda
Item# 9 -4
SUBJECT: Update of Master Recreation and Parks Master Plan-
Charge to Master Recreation and Parks Plan Work Group
DEPARTMENT: PLANNING PUBLIC HEARING: Yes_X—No
BUDGET AMENDMENT REQUIRED: _Yes_X—No
ATTACHMENT(S): INFORMATION CONTACT:
Charge to Master Recreation and Parks Plan Work Group Mary Willis - Extension 2583
Bob Jones-Extension 2661
TELEPHONE NUMBERS
Hillsborough 732-8181
Durham 688-7331
Mebane 227-2031
Chapel Hill 967-9251
PURPOSE: To consider a charge to the Master Recreation and Parks Plan Work Group to
update the Master Recreation and Parks Plan.
BACKGROUND: In 1988,the Master Recreation and Parks Plan was adopted as an element of the
Comprehensive Plan. It was prepared by Woolpert Consultants,working with
the Recreation and Parks Department and the Planning Department.
In January, 1996, a report was presented to the Assembly of Governments by the
Recreation and Parks Work Group,a group comprised of elected officials and
Recreation&Parks staff from the municipalities and County. The report focused
on"Recreation&Park Issues in Orange County"and recommended three
specific actions,including:
• Standardization of recreation sections of land use ordinances across
jurisdictions,particularly with respect to the standards used to define
recreation and parks requirements;
2 i
• Employment of joint siting, designing, and management of school and park
sites across jurisdiction boundaries; and
• Use of public/private partnerships across jurisdictions.
At the February, 1996 public hearing, proposed amendments to the recreation
payment-in-lieu provisions were presented. Among the recommendations
contained in the report was the suggestion that consideration be given to updating
the Master Recreation and Parks Plan. The rationale for this recommendation was
that the Plan was eight years old, and issues had arisen which suggested an
update was warranted. Those issues included the following:
• The relationship between existing and proposed school sites, and proposed
parks;
• The development of "small area plans" in the northern portions of Chapel
Hill and Carrboro and the impact, if any, that proposed park sites in those
areas would have on the need for "County" facilities;
• The utilization of landfill and reservoir sites, both existing and proposed, as
possible recreation sites;
• The discussion of strategies for preserving natural and cultural resources
through open space design, including the relationship of these resources to
active and passive recreational pursuits;and
• The evolution of a Parks and Recreation Advisory Board for the Town of
Hillsborough and the role the Town would play in the provision of
recreational facilities.
Updating the Plan was included as one of the Commissioner's goals for fiscal
year 1997-98.
Establishment of Work Group
A work group should be established to facilitate coordination with the school
boards and municipalities in development of the revised Plan. Staff
recommends that the work group contain representatives from the following:
• Orange County Board of Commissioners
• Orange County Recreation and Parks Advisory Council
• Orange County Planning Board
• Town of Hillsborough
• Town of Chapel Hill
3
• Town of Carrboro
(Note: Representatives from towns could be from Parks/Recreation
Departments, Parks/Recreation Board)
• OWASA
• Orange County School Board
• Carrboro-Chapel Hill School Board
Staff support will be provided by the Planning Department and the Recreation
and Parks Department.
A draft charge for the Workgroup is attached.
Upon approval of the charge to and general composition of the Work Group,
Staff will contact each member entity to request appointment of a
representative. After receiving names of appointees, Staff will present the final
charge, including individual appointees,to the Board of Commissioners for
adoption.
RECOMMENDATION: The Administration recommends adoption of the attached charge to
update the Master Recreation and Parks Plan.
4
DRAFT
Charge to Recreation and Parks Work Group
March 5, 1997
BACKGROUND
At the February, 1996 public hearing, proposed amendments to the recreation payment-in-lieu
provisions were presented. Among the recommendations contained in the report was the suggestion that
consideration be given to updating the Master Recreation and Parks Plan. The rationale for this
recommendation was that the Plan was eight years old, and issues had arisen which suggested an update
was warranted. Those issues included the following:
• The relationship between existing and proposed school sites,and proposed parks;
• The development of "small area plans" in the northern portions of Chapel Hill and Carrboro and the
impact,if any,that proposed park sites in those areas would have on the need for"County"facilities;
• The utilization of landfill and reservoir sites,both existing and proposed,as possible recreation sites;
• The discussion of strategies for preserving natural and cultural resources through open space design,
including the relationship of these resources to active and passive recreational pursuits; and
• The evolution of a Parks and Recreation Advisory Board for the Town of Hillsborough and the role
the Town would play in the provision of recreational facilities.
CHARGE
The charge to the Master Recreation and Parks Plan Work Group is to prepare an update to the Master
Recreation and Parks Plan for presentation at the February 23, 1998 public hearing.
The update of the Master Recreation and Parks Plan shall include the following:
1) Update of inventory of recreational facilities and opportunities;
2) Update of needs assessment;
3) Development of standards used to define recreation and parks requirements which will be used
by Hillsborough,Chapel Hill and Carrboro,as well as Orange County;
4) Utilization of joint siting, designing, and management of school and park sites across
jurisdictions;
5
5) Development of tangible,realistic parkland acquisition and development goals;
6) Reassessment of service area boundaries for payment in-lieu- of dedication; and
7) Reassessment of dedication provisions related to greenways in the Joint Planning Area.
The Plan update shall emphasize coordination between the County and its municipalities and school
boards in determining recreation needs,targeting areas for future park sites, and providing for the
joint siting of school and park facilities.
PROPOSED MEMBERSHIP
• Orange County Commissioner(1)
• Orange County Manager
• Orange County Recreation and Parks Advisory Council (2)
• Orange County Planning Board(2)
• Town of Hillsborough (Recreation/Parks Department or Board)(1)
• Town of Chapel Hill (Recreation/Parks Department or Board) (1)
• Town of Carrboro (Recreation/Parks Department or Board) (1)
• Orange County School Board(1)
• Carrboro-Chapel Hill School Board(1)
• OWASA(1)
Staff assistance will be provided by the Planning Department and the Recreation and Parks
Department.
6 '
Adopted 5/14/96
Revised 10/1/96
RECREATION&PARKS
GOAL: UPDATE THE MASTER RECREATION&PARKS FOR ORANGE COUNTY
This
g oal involves updating the Master Recreation ation&Parks Plan adopted in 1988. Issues have arisen which
suggest an update is needed, and a recent report to the Assembly of Governments cited the need for
standardization of recreation and park standards,and the siting, design,and management of school and park
sites across jurisdictional lines.
BACKGROUND&OBJECTIVES
At the February, 1996 public hearing, proposed amendments to the recreation dedication/payment-in-lieu
provisions were presented. Among the recommendations contained in the report was the suggestion that
consideration be given to updating the Master Recreation & Parks Plan. The rationale for this
recommendation was that the Plan was eight years old, and issues had arisen which suggested an update
was warranted,including the following:
• The relationship between existing and proposed school sites,and proposed parks;
• The development of"small area plans" in the northern portions of Chapel Hill and Carrboro and the
impact, if any,that proposed park sites in those areas would have on the need for"County"facilities;
• The utilization of landfill and reservoir sites,both existing and proposed,as possible recreation sites;
• The discussion of strategies for preserving natural and cultural resources through open space design,
including the relationship of these resources to active and passive recreational pursuits;and
• The evolution of a Recreation & Parks Advisory Board for the Town of Hillsborough and the role the
Town would play in the provision of recreational facilities.
At about the same time,a report was presented to the Assembly of Governments by the Recreation&Parks
Work Group, a group comprised of elected officials and Recreation & Parks staff from the municipalities
and County. The report focused on"Recreation & Park Issues in Orange County" and recommended three
specific actions,including:
• Standardization of recreation sections of land use ordinances across jurisdictions, particularly with
respect to the standards used to define recreation and parks requirements;
• Employment of joint siting, designing, and management of school and park sites across jurisdictions,
particularly with respect to planning all new school sites to include park facilities and existing schools
improved with such amenities where mutually beneficial;and
• Using public/private partnerships across jurisdictions.
J0 7
Given the above events and associated recommendations,a Plan of Action has been prepared through which
to implement the goal of updating the Master Recreation & Parks Plan. Overall responsibility for
implementation would be the responsibility of the Recreation & Parks Advisory Council with staff
assistance provided by the Recreation&Parks and Planning Departments.
RESOURCE REQUIREMENTS
Completion of this goal would involve the following commitment of existing staff resources:
Planning Director Recreation&Parks Director
Planner II/Landscape Architect Planner II/Special Projects
GIS Project Coordinator
Staff will compile data from time sheets concerning staff hours expended and costs associated with
completion of this goal. Monthly reports will be distributed to County Manager, Advisory Boards, and
Board of Commissioners outlining monthly/cumulative staff hours and costs assigned to this project.
S '
4
M
Q t-- a*, 00 O�CN
CN aN
cc
(OU c C�
WE V ¢ Q d zi O O z A ti w d
c zs C ^ o
cz o �
OF c,y °en 60 CV.
E A
aci �, � °n3 ° '� U ° � •E a°i :°
rz o c � -v L
a5 � � � ring `* � � � � � � b -0 o
Cd
La c
o aZ : Z ar a -v o � c U
CdJ3
a U a 'OO c� a 3 �' •� c U a. w .° a a°'' U L U
F d -,
L
a
a
0
�h r
V
d
S
F
0
d
U
A
z
0
F
U
O
F
Gr,
W
O
l •.{:?iii$:viy;:%i,'(ii:::i:;:;:;�i:%i:%:•:ii:{ii:;:}�:.;:}:'i:(:':t:::ii:::i'�ii:+<iii:>`ii�i:Li:r:<S} �'r::??:`t:}:`C'iiii:{{:;isisisi>"F.%:%:+(:ii:'i:}}�}ji::ri i}:}:(:}:ii:;iiiij}}i:;:,t;i:;:i%`i'`:iiiii'!;:Ly,:;:i:
A
�ti i�':iiii:ii•i:•�'�iiii :::::i:i:S'r:i:�'rri?:?^F:iii:�i}:iiii»i:+% :::!j%i:%ii}i}�i'iii 'i:`:+::+:::%i::iiil:ririi}:i'?:iii'rii}'r:<i:}yii+'+is�i:�?ii:t+:;:;:i:?isiity>::+:%:j;:j%:%?:i`;'?:%:%?:
a
w
..kx
O
:::;;..�?:%:::::'::%:%:.:>�%': ::j%Y#`#`k5%%�%:: :: <%::;:::;'�"'::f:::�;:?::>: %�::�`::�f:�irr.%'�:%`::•'';:±;:`r:::%:%:; :�<; %i;±�;::::%:%%�'%%:;r'?:%:%;S:::i:;:'=.::i::::'::±:::5::::':'::'':%':'�::::`yy:`:fy%% `'%:::;:«�i::':;%;:':; ;��';�;
d