HomeMy WebLinkAboutORD-2000-106 Orange Enterprises Capital Project Ordinance A JID - 2auo - o (I, S:vb b
Orange Enterprises Capital Project
Capital Project Ordinance J
Be it ordained by the Orange County Board of County Commissioners that pursuant to Section
13.2 of Chapter 159 of the General Statutes of North Carolina,the following capital project is
hereby adopted.
Section 1. The project authorized partially funds renovations for the Orange Enterprises
facility on Valley Forge Road in Hillsborough. Orange Enterprises may use funds
allocated in this project as matching funds to secure alternative funding and allow
additions to the current facility. Proceeds from the County's portion of the one
half cent sales taxes finance this project.
Section 2. The officers of the County are hereby directed to proceed with the project
within budget contained herein.
Section 3. The following revenue is anticipated to complete this project:
Through roug
1999-00 FY 2000-01 2000-01
Sales Tax $10,500
Bond un s
Private Placement
Fees
Other
Total un mg $10,500 $0 $10,500
Section 4. The following amount is appropriated for this project:
Through Through
1999-00 FY 2000-01 2000-01
Land/Building
Design
onstruchon
er $10,500 $0 $10,50
Total Costs $10,5 $10,5
Section 5. This ordinance supersedes all previous Orange Enterprises Capital Project
Ordinances for Orange County.
Section 6. This ordinance,originally adopted June 28, 1996, shall be in effect until June
30,2001.
Adopted this 29'day of June 2000.
The Board approved a lease for Suite 105 at 501 West Franklin Street, Chapel Hill, NC to 17
Brokerage Resource, Inc. for$1,100.00 per month and taxes-in-lieu of$100 per month.
Y. Bid Award—Leachate Collection Piping
The Board awarded a bid for Leachate Collection Piping for$26,241.33.
Z. Bid Award—Orange County Landfill Phase 4 Construction Geosynthetics;
The Board awarded a bid for Phase 4 Construction - Geosynthetics at the Orange County
Landfill to Clary Hood, Inc. of Kissimmee, Florida in the amount of$346,000 and authorized the
Purchasing Director to execute the necessary paperwork, and authorized the County Manager to
execute change orders as may be necessary during the course of the installation, to the extent project
funds are available for this work.
Other bids received are listed below:
Reynolds - $432,500
Clary Hood - $346,000
Plastic Fusion - $450,479
Serrot International, Inc, - $457,906.60
aa. Budget Amendment#13
The Board approved budget ordinance amendments, grant project ordinance, and a capital
project ordinance for fiscal year 1999-2000.
bb. Adoption of 2000-2001 Grant and Capital Project Ordinances
The Board approved grant project ordinances and selected capital project ordinances in
accordance with the actions taken by the Board of Commissioners at the June 20, 2000 budget work
session.
cc. Change in Board of Commissioners' Meetin-q Schedule
The Board approved a change in the Board of Commissioners' meeting schedule to change
the joint meeting with the two school boards from September 21, 2000 to September 25, 2000.
VOTE ON THE CONSENT AGENDA: UNANIMOUS
ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA
b. Minutes
motion was made by Commissioner Gordon, seconded by Commissioner Jacobs to
approve the highlighted draft of the minutes for March 21't and the minutes for March 23`d with the
changes as shown on the green sheet.
VOTE: UNANIMOUS
rn. Contract for Orange County Video Production
The Board considered approving a contract with Horizon Video Productions, Inc. to produce a
10-12 minute video about Orange County's departments and services to be presented at new employee
and board and commission orientation sessions, to citizens on cable access television, and to
community, civic, and educational groups.
Commissioner Brown said that her interest in this was that the Commissioners have not had
any opportunity to discuss it and what it would be like. She would either like to hold this item and the
next item to have a presentation on it, or to put some very specific language in the contract specifying
when the Commissioners would be part of the review process.
Commissioner Jacobs said that there were three separate communication efforts going on —a
message to the people, an update of the web site, and this video. He does not see that these three are
in any way coordinated and he would like to see it be a coherent message.
Commissioner Gordon said that there could be some language added to say that the video,
the web site, and the message to the people would articulate a common and coherent theme and
message. Also, the Board of Commissioners would approve the effort at key intervals to be identified by
the Commissioners. This common theme is specified in the Strategic Communications Plan.
Commissioner Brown suggested having a presentation on both of the project concepts—the
web site design and the video— by the proposed companies so that the Commissioners could see what