Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda - 12-11-2012 - 5a i ORANGE COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS ACTION AGENDA ITEM ABSTRACT Meeting Date: December 11, 2012 Action Agenda Item No: 5-a SUBJECT: MINUTES DEPARTMENT: PUBLIC HEARING: (Y/N) No ATTACHMENT(S): INFORMATION CONTACT: Donna Baker, 245-2130 Draft Minutes PURPOSE: To correct and/or approve the minutes as submitted by the Clerk to the Board as listed below: Attachment 1 October 11, 2012 BOCC Joint Meeting with Town of Carrboro BACKGROUND: In accordance with 153A-42 of the General Statutes, the Governing Board has the legal duty to approve all minutes that are entered into the official journal of the Board's proceedings. FINANCIAL IMPACT: NONE RECOMMENDATION(S): The Manager recommends the Board approve minutes as presented or as amended. 1 1 DRAFT Attachment 1 2 3 MINUTES 4 ORANGE COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS 5 CARRBORO BOARD OF ALDERMEN 6 JOINT MEETING 7 October 11, 2012 8 9 COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENT: Chair Bernadette Pelissier and Commissioners 10 Valerie Foushee, Alice Gordon, Pam Hemminger, Barry Jacobs, Earl McKee and Steve Yuhasz 11 COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ABSENT: Valerie Foushee 12 COUNTY ATTORNEYS PRESENT: John Roberts 13 COUNTY STAFF PRESENT: County Manager Frank Clifton, Assistant County Managers 14 Gwen Harvey, Michael Talbert, Clarence Grier, and Clerk to the Board Donna S. Baker (All 15 other staff inembers will be identified appropriately below) 16 CARRBORO BOARD OF ALDERMEN MEMBERS PRESENT: Mayor Mark Chilton and 17 Aldermen Randee Haven-O'Donnell, Lydia Lavelle, Sammy Slade, and Michelle Johnson 18 CARRBORO BOARD OF ALDERMEN MEMBERS ABSENT: Dan Coleman, Jacquelyn Gist, 19 David Andrews, Town Manager 20 21 Welcome and Openinq Remarks 22 23 Chair Pelissier said that Commissioner Foushee was out of town and unable to attend. 24 Mayor Chilton said that Alderman Dan Coleman would not be here tonight and Michelle 25 Johnson would be late. He said that he appreciated that the County staff and Board of County 26 Commissioners achieved an agreement with Triangle Transit and DCHC MPO to move forward 27 with the proposal for a '/�-cent sales tax for transit. 28 Chair Pelissier pointed out some handouts at everyone's places: 29 - Information related to Access Road to Twin Creeks Park as requested by 30 Commissioner Gordon 31 - Summary of the Joint Economic Development activities for item #2 32 - Copy of legislation related to the new town hotel tax in Carrboro 33 34 Introductions were made. 35 36 1. Access Road — Twin Creeks Park/ Ballentine Subdivision (MI Homes) 37 Department of Environment, Agriculture, Parks and Recreation Director Dave Stancil 38 introduced this item. He made reference to the adopted master plan for Twin Creeks. The 39 map dates back to May 2005 and in March of 2006 the plan was presented to the Town of 40 Carrboro. One thing that has changed is that the funding that was identified to build Phase I of 41 the park was not adequate to build Phase I as planned. The staff then came back with a 42 revised Phase I. In the fall of 2008-09 there was an economic downturn and this caused the 43 park to be put on hold. If this park were built in total, it would cost about $8-12 million. There 44 are no funds to construct this park at this time. Another Phase I was generated, which was to 45 create a greenway in 2010-11. This greenway was built with stimulus funds. It should be noted 46 that the greenway crosses Jones Creek. Another question in 2007-2009 was that when the 47 park came forward, what form would the approval process take. The idea was that there could 48 be a development agreement between the Town and County. This was discussed with a very 49 informal letter. Nothing was done further to create an interlocal agreement. 2 1 Over the last few years, the County and MI homes have had several discussions about 2 a cost share agreement for an access road. The map shows it as Road A. It is an east to west 3 road, which begins at Old NC 86 and straddles the property line of MI homes and Twin Creeks. 4 When the road was proposed in 2005, it was before the Ballentine subdivision and there had 5 not been discussion about extending the road to the east. After the master plan was adopted 6 and the subdivision came into being, the proposed road came into focus. 7 Mayor Chilton said that his recollection is that the Town's connector road policy had 8 called for a connection from Lake Hogan Farms Road to Eubanks Road for many years. 9 Dave Stancil said that for the north/south road, the master plan discussions did include 10 Lake Hogan Farm Road Extension. 11 Mayor Chilton said that this plan is more than 15 years old and it sounded like Dave 12 Stancil was saying that the Town had only recently become involved to require that there would 13 be a connection from Lake Hogan Farm Road north to Eubanks Road. He said that this has 14 been part of the plan for 15-20 years or more. He said that his recollection was that the road 15 would go through the middle of the property that Orange County bought. It was only some time 16 after the County bought it when he raised the question that the road should go to the east. His 17 understanding was that the Town of Carrboro had planned for this property to be a mixed use 18 development. Instead the County bought the property, took it off the Carrboro tax rolls, and 19 came up with the plan for a park and school site. 20 21 Michelle Johnson arrived at 7:21 PM. 22 23 Mayor Chilton said that he is frustrated that it seems that the County is trying to say that 24 the Town is only now mentioning a road when the County knew about it a long time ago. He 25 said that the County is saying that the Town is not doing economic development but this is not 26 true. He said that it is a little galling to hear the County complain about the notion of paying for 27 a bridge at taxpayer expense to go across this creek when the Town's plans had always called 28 for the private sector to pay for this. The Town's plan was for the private sector to be building 29 some diversification into the tax base through a mixed use development on this site. 30 Commissioner Gordon said that there are two road issues here. One issue concerns a 31 road that goes to the east and crosses the creek. With respect to the second issue, she said 32 that when it was decided to build a school on the northern part of this property, they wanted the 33 road to go more to the east, around the school property rather than through it. However, there 34 was still a plan to have a north-south road. 35 Frank Clifton said that the real issue is that if MI Homes will or will not build a part of the 36 road or the Town does not approve the development, this will affect the building of the park. 37 Mark Chilton said that it is outrageous that the Town had a plan for economic 38 development for this property but the County bought the property. He said that one of the 39 County Commissioners, who is no longer on the Board, had the intention of preventing the 40 Town's economic development plan from moving forward. 41 Frank Clifton said that if MI Homes does not go forward with the development of the 42 road, then the park is on hold until there is an access road. If it cannot be dealt with, then there 43 needs to be a redesign. 44 Mayor Chilton said that it was not his decision that the County buy this property that 45 would need a connector road. He said that the County government frustrated the plans of the 46 Town of Carrboro and now the County government is returning to the Town of Carrboro and 47 saying that it cannot afford to frustrate the Town's plans the way it planned to do when the 48 property was purchased. 49 Alderman Slade asked about the issue. 3 1 Frank Clifton said that MI Homes does not see it viable to build a bridge to cross a creek 2 since they do not have an interest in the property on the other side. 3 Carrboro Planning Director Trish McGuire made a PowerPoint presentation. 4 5 Discussion of Access Road — Ballentine and Twin Creeks Park 6 Joint Meeting of the Board of Aldermen and Board of County Commissioners 7 8 October 11, 2012 9 Key Issues 10 - Maintaining the ability of Lake Hogan Farm Road to connect between Homestead 11 Road and Eubanks Road 12 - Access road at Ballentine/Twin Creeks stubbing out to the east, as currently 13 designed, is part of the Lake Hogan Farm extension. 14 - Two viable alternative alignments planned or permitted (per Town of Carrboro); both 15 cross Jones Creek 16 17 Approved Master Plan for Twin Creeks Park (map) 18 19 Approved Conditional Use Permit for Ballentine subdivision 20 - Permit to cross a jurisdictional tributary is required from Army Corps of Engineers 21 (ACOE) 22 - ACOE staff have communicated that the Town is the applicant most likely to 23 demonstrate purpose and need for the crossing 24 Process 25 - Absent other action, decision on crossing to be determined as part of conditional use 26 permit 27 - Alternative process that engages property owners and others is less problematic 28 - Could be modeled on that used in discussing development agreement in 2007-2009 29 - Once a preferred alignment was selected, Town could initiate permitting process 30 with ACOE 31 - Staff has been exploring details of permitting process to determine fiscal and staff 32 impacts 33 34 Recent History 35 - Board of Aldermen review of Master Plan for Twin Creeks 36 - Development Agreement discussions 37 - Ballentine CUP, Modification/Rezoning and Pending Re-submittal 38 - Clarification of number of stream crossings 39 - Land Use Ordinance, Transportation/Traffic 40 41 Commissioner Gordon asked if it would be Town policy to require an applicant to build a 42 connector road if it were not the County and Trish McGuire said yes. 43 Mike Brough said that there has been a plan for this road to go from the south to the 44 north for 20 years or more. The question is where the exact alignment will be. He said that the 45 Town of Carrboro is going to have to apply for the permit and it cannot apply for the permit 46 unless it knows where the creek crossing is going to be. This cannot be determined unless the 47 staff is directed to come back with a process that would identify where the crossing will be. 48 Alderman Slade made a motion to direct staff to work on starting the process. 49 Mike Brough said that the staff needs to come back to the board with a proposed 50 process, which the board can then endorse. 4 1 Commissioner McKee asked if it was the Town or the County authority that would 2 require a stub-out across the creek and it was answered the Town. He asked if there was a 3 process that the Town could go through so as not to require this stub-out. 4 Mayor Chilton said that the Town could change its plans for the connecting road policy. 5 His perspective is that the Town would not find anyone that would want to see Old NC 86 a 6 four-lane road and instead turn this traffic to Eubanks Road. In order to make the connection 7 north to Eubanks Road, there has to be a creek crossing somewhere. The question becomes 8 who will pay for it and who the road will serve. 9 Chair Pelissier said that the Town would come back with a process to review this road 10 alignment. 11 Alderman Lavelle seconded Alderman Slade's motion. 12 13 (Carrboro Board of Aldermen) VOTE: UNANIMOUS 14 15 2. Economic Development 16 a) General Discussion 17 18 Economic Development Director Steve Brantley made a PowerPoint presentation. 19 20 Summary of Joint Economic Development Activities 21 22 Orange County & the Town of Carrboro 23 Presented by Steve Brantley, Director, Orange County Economic Development 24 October 11, 2012 25 26 27 Key Joint Activities 28 - Infrastructure Support to Promote Business Retention & Expansion 29 - Marketing 30 - Agriculture & Food Processing in Economic Development 31 - The Arts 32 - Tourism 33 34 Infrastructure Support for Business Retention 35 - Interlocal Agreement by County & Town to Fund the Repair of a Failing Sewer Line 36 37 Marketinq Support 38 Marketinq & Sponsorship: Promotion provided by the Orange County Economic Development 39 office 40 - Carrboro Music Festival 41 - Carrboro Film Festival 42 43 Aqricultural Economic Development—Joint Promotion 44 - PLANT Breeze Farm Enterprise Incubator 45 - (PFAP) Piedmont Food &Agricultural Processing Center 46 47 PLANT(People Learning Agriculture Now for Tomorrow) Breeze Farm Enterprise 48 Incubator 49 5 1 Carrboro-based business alumni of Breeze Farm are now sellinq locallv arown produce at the 2 Carrboro Farmers Market: 3 - Cates Corner Farm 4 - Feels Farm 5 - Box Turtle Bakery 6 7 Breeze Farm instructor qroups are also sellinq locally qrown produce at the Carrboro 8 Farmers Market: 9 - Maple Spring Gardens 10 - Peregrine Farm 11 - Perrywinkle Farm 12 - Sunset Farms 13 - Wild Hare Farm 14 15 Carrboro-based businesses utilize the County's Piedmont Food &Agricultural 16 Processing Center 17 18 Applicants & Clients: 19 - Clients based in Carrboro — 1 20 - Applicants "in process" from Carrboro—4 21 - Operate regularly in Carrboro— 3 22 - Sell products to Carrboro businesses —8 23 - Clients considering a Carrboro location —3 24 - Have employees from Carrboro— 5 25 26 PFAP's Key Clients in Carrboro: 27 - Tempeh Girl - makes tempeh from tofu 28 - Tar Heel Creamery - gourmet ice cream 29 - Baguettaboutit - food truck 30 - Capp's Apizza -wood-fired Neapolitan pizza 31 - Vintage Bee - buys honey from at least one Carrboro apiary 32 33 Joint Promotion of the Arts in Economic Development 34 - Awarding of Arts Grants 35 - ExploreChapelHilIARTS.com and ExploreChapelHill.com web sites 36 - Quarterly Artist's Salon 37 - Significance of the "Arts & Economy Prosperity IV Study" 38 39 Orange County Arts Commission's Quarterly Artists' Salon 40 Located in the West End Theatre at The ArtsCenter in Carrboro, the "Artists Salon" offers free 41 professional development for local artists. Salon topics over the past 12 months have included: 42 43 - Emergency Preparedness for Artists 44 - Make Tourism Work for You: Art + 45 - Shoebox Accounting 46 - Exploring Resources, Leveraging Assets, Crafting Your Path 47 48 Awarding of Arts Grants by the Orange County Arts Commission 49 50 Grants to Carrboro Non-Profits &Artists: 6 1 (Fa112012) 2 - ArtsCenter - $3,900 3 - Friends of the Carrboro Branch Library - $1,500 4 - WCOM-FM - $1,500 5 - Susan Simone - $1,000 (Trailer Tales: The Mobile Home Story in Orange County, 6 NC) 7 - Sean Wellington - $1000 (The OC Hope Project) 8 9 Grants to Carrboro Non-Profits &Artists: 10 (Spring 2012) 11 - ArtsCenter - $3,000 (Eleventh Annual "10 By 10 in the Triangle" Theatre Festival; 12 Teaching Artist Fees for 7 Residencies at Central Elementary School) 13 - Chapel Hill Carrboro Public School Foundation - $1,240 ("Spoken Word Poetry 14 Project" at Phoenix Academy— alternative high school) 15 - Orange County Artists Guild - $1,500 (To pay artist to design and develop Studio 16 Tour brochure) 17 - Town of Carrboro Recreation & Parks Dept. - $1,500 (Carrboro Music Festival) 18 19 Total Direct Grant Funds: 20 Awarded to Carrboro non-profits & artists over the previous 12-month period = "�����,���'�� 21 22 Total Indirect Grant Funds: 23 Orange County Arts Commission awards benefitting Carrboro's citizens over the previous 12- 24 month period = "�������� �':������� 25 26 Results of the "Arts & Economic Prosperity IV Study" 27 The recent study found that non-profit arts businesses generate: 28 - $85.4 million annually in economic activity in Orange County 29 - Supports 3,352 jobs locally 30 - Returns $3.5 million in local and $4.5 million in state revenue 31 32 Joint Tourism Activities in Orange County & Carrboro 33 - Visitors Bureau Web Page 34 35 Orange County Visitors Bureau Supports the Town of Carrboro 36 37 Sponsorships of Events: 38 - Carrboro Film Festival 39 - Carrboro Music Festival 40 - Carrboro Visitors Guide 41 - Carrboro Day 42 - Our State, Independent, Chapel Hill Weekly 43 44 Production of Ads & Brochures: 45 - Facility charts for Carrboro Hampton Inn 46 - Ads for 2013 Meeting Planning Guide 47 48 Creation of New Audio/Video Database: 49 - New photo image bank was made with 245 updated photos of Carrboro 50 - New video bank has been made featuring Carrboro scenes 7 1 2 Promotion of Carrboro events in Maqazines: 3 - Southern Living magazine 4 - Our State magazine 5 6 Other Specific Examples of Tourism Promotion in Carrboro 7 - Carrboro's art galleries, ArtsCenter & Cat's Cradle have been featured in ads 8 - Facebook promotions are added weekly 9 - Carrboro is promoted throughout the annual 15-page Visitors Guide 10 - Carrboro referrals are made daily to restaurants via walk-ins to Visitors Center 11 - Carrboro is promoted extensively in a new website, launching October 8th 12 13 Hospitality at Carrboro Events 14 VI P hospitalitv aift baqs were provided to: 15 - Carrboro Film Festival Attendees 16 - DSI Comedy Festival Attendees 17 18 19 Consideration for Development: 20 (1) OWASA advises further engineering review to determine adequate water (a) pressure 21 and (b) flow required for sufficient sprinkler fire suppression. 22 (2) "Water and Sewer Management Planning and Boundary Agreement" (WASMPBA) 23 would have to be jointly amended, along with OWASA's University Lake watershed 24 restrictions governing utility extensions and connections in this area along NC 54, 25 according to Orange County's Planning Department. 26 27 Alderman Slade thanked the County and Annette Stone for collaborating on economic 28 development. He asked about similar studies about agriculture and how much could be 29 generated with agriculture. He also asked about the process the County uses to allocate funds 30 from the '/4-cent sales tax for economic development. 31 Frank Clifton said that when the process was initiated, there were general guidelines. 32 Infrastructure is a priority. An Economic Development Advisory Board has been appointed with 33 representatives from all over the County. There is great flexibility going forward. 34 35 36 b) Public Water and Sewer for Business Development on NC Highway 54 37 Carrboro's Economic Development Director Annette Stone said that this area is part of 38 Carrboro's Extraterritorial Jurisdiction. It is zoned by Carrboro. She said that this area is along 39 NC 54 and lends itself to be a manufacturing business node. It is in the University Lake 40 Watershed and there are existing buildings. Staff would like to continue to look at the existing 41 zoning and see what could be put here. She showed pictures of the existing buildings. 42 Mayor Chilton said that the issue is the modernization of the fire code and the use of 43 sprinkler systems in new commercial buildings. He said that the range of uses is very narrow. 44 He does not know the solution, but the various rules need to be discussed if there is an 45 infrastructure project that is going to happen here. He said that the reason there is no building 46 there now is because the building burned down and the Town of Carrboro did not put the fire 47 out because of the unknown chemicals on the site and washing them into University Lake. 48 Alderman O'Donnell said that the owner of the property has come before the board 49 several times with concerns about the lack of potential to bring in incubators or other 8 1 businesses that have expressed interest in this property. The problem is where the parcels can 2 go in the future. 3 Frank Clifton said that the two staffs need to work on this to find out the feasibility of this 4 project. 5 Commissioner Jacobs said that they should have the conversation in the context of lake 6 watershed protection and staff could invite OWASA staff to the table too. 7 Steve Brantley suggested doing an environmental assessment too. 8 9 3. Carrboro's Vision for Use of the New Town Hotel Tax 10 Mayor Chilton said that Carrboro has had the authority to levy a hotel tax (approximately 11 3%). The estimates are that there is about $95,000 worth of revenue when applied to the new 12 hotel that is currently being built. Under the terms of the current authority from the legislature, 13 the Town can spend 2/3 of that money on visitor promotion and 1/3 of the money on visitor 14 services. Visitor promotion is very narrowly defined and includes activities that would 15 encourage people to spend the night in the community and spend the night in the hotels. One- 16 third of the money has to be spent on things that would serve the visitor community. He said 17 that visitor promotion will be done on a contract basis with the Orange County Visitor's Bureau. 18 The terms of the agreement will be up to the Board of Aldermen. 19 20 4. Solid Waste and Related Issues Update 21 a) Joint Efforts 22 Assistant County Manager Michael Talbert said that the County-owned landfill is 23 scheduled to close on June 30, 2013, creating a need for the County to find a suitable means of 24 disposing of municipal solid waste (MSW) generated in Orange County. County staff has 25 recently entered into negotiations with the City of Durham regarding use of the Durham waste 26 transfer station (WTS) by any and/or all of the jurisdictions within Orange County. Based on 27 those negotiations, a draft agreement (Attachment A) was developed by Orange County and is 28 currently under review by the City of Durham. The draft agreement includes provisions for the 29 use of the Durham Waste Transfer Station by the Town of Carrboro, should it choose to do so. 30 It is anticipated that this agreement will be finalized and executed prior to the end of 2012. 31 32 Solid Waste Interlocal Agreement: 33 In 1999 Orange County, Chapel Hill, Carrboro, and later Hillsborough entered into an 34 interlocal cooperation agreement (Attachment B), the Agreement for Solid Waste Management 35 ("Interlocal"), regarding the future of the Greene Tract, and also the disposal of municipal solid 36 waste (MSW), construction and demolition waste (C&D), and recyclable materials. 37 The Interlocal provides in great detail for the management of MSW. However, its provisions 38 related to C&D waste and recyclable materials are extremely limited. 39 In September 2011 the attorneys for the County and Municipalities met and 40 discussed the Interlocal Agreement. Their determination was that upon the June 30, 2013 41 closure of the Orange County Landfill, the Interlocal effectively terminates with regard to the 42 provisions related to MSW. Given the limited extent to which the Interlocal addresses the 43 management of recyclable materials and C&D waste, if the governing boards of the County and 44 Municipalities desire to continue the current method of the collection and processing of 45 recyclable materials, a new Interlocal Agreement should be developed. Regardless of whether 46 the County and Municipalities continue to partner with regard to the management of MSW, it is 47 wise for the County and Municipalities to continue to partner with regard to planning for the 48 management of MSW and recyclable materials. Joint planning, waste reduction goal setting 49 and reporting would particularly benefit the County and assist the County in its state-mandated 50 planning responsibilities. 9 1 In December 2010 the BOCC established a Solid Waste Interlocal Agreement Work 2 Group, with Commissioner Steve Yuhasz appointed as the County representative in June, 3 2012. Mayor Mark Chilton was appointed as the Town of Carrboro's representative, with 4 Alderman Randee Haven O'Donnell selected as an alternate. This Work Group has not been 5 activated for reasons relating to the Rogers Road community mitigation request of May 2011 6 and the uncertainty with regard to the outcomes of the Town of Chapel Hill's decision to 7 conduct a comprehensive analysis of its solid waste services and programs. 8 9 10 11 b) Solid Waste Advisory Board (SWAB) 12 Michael Talbert said that the Solid Waste Advisory Board (SWAB) was established as 13 part of the 1999 Interlocal Agreement for Solid Waste Management and has been active with 14 regard to a number of policies, programs and acting as a public forum since that time. Given 15 the uncertainty surrounding the decision to close the landfill on June 30, 2013 and Chapel Hill's 16 ongoing analysis of its future solid waste services and practices, the SWAB has been less 17 active and currently experiences no representation from Orange County or the Town of 18 Carrboro. Presently only the Towns of Chapel Hill and Hillsborough have active members, 19 along with ex-officio membership from the University. Commissioner Yuhasz is County Liaison 20 to the Board. The SWAB has recently formally recommended that existing vacancies be filled 21 so its work can continue until some more permanent long term resolution can be determined 22 among the jurisdictions. The SWAB believes that some joint relationship among the local 23 governments will be necessary to effectively continue solid waste management efforts into the 24 future, efforts that will, at a minimum, involve waste reduction and recycling services/programs. 25 26 c) Greene Tract 27 Michael Talbert said that the Greene Tract (164 acres) was acquired in 1984 for 28 $608,000 and came to the County as an asset in the Solid Waste Fund. As a result of the 29 Interlocal Agreement, sixty (60) acres of the Greene Tract was conveyed to Orange County for 30 "Solid Waste management purposes". The Inter Local Agreement (amended April 12, 2000) 31 provided for the three owning partners to determine, over a two-year period, the ultimate 32 disposition of the remaining 104 jointly held acres. 33 A Greene Tract Work Group that included representatives of all parties to the Interlocal 34 Agreement began meeting in 2001 and presented Recommendations on March 21, 2002. 35 A Greene Tract Work Group Resolution, making a recommendation on the 104 acres jointly 36 owned by Orange County, Chapel Hill and Carrboro, was approved by the BOCC on December 37 10, 2002. Attachment C is the Resolution from December 10, 2002. The remaining 60 acres of 38 the Green Tract continues to be owned as an asset in the Solid Waste Fund. 39 A five-year payment plan for the 104 acres jointly owned by Orange County, Chapel Hill 40 and Carrboro was agreed to by all parties. Fiscal Year 2012/13 is the 5th year of the five year 41 plan. The Town of Carrboro did not provide its Fiscal Year 2011/12 payment of$29,524. 42 43 Frank Clifton said that the Town of Chapel Hill is doing its own solid waste study about 44 what to do about its trash when the landfill closes. He said that the County does not know if the 45 towns have any ideas about what they will do when the landfill closes. 46 Mayor Chilton said that there has been only minimal contact on the elected official level 47 with the Town of Chapel Hill. He said that the Town wants to continue with the recycling. He 48 does not anticipate major changes in the way the Town of Carrboro does things. He said that 49 the staff feels obligated to the taxpayers to look at other options besides going to the Durham 50 transfer station because of the expense. 10 1 Commissioner Hemminger said that the Durham transfer station is a temporary, short- 2 term strategy. She does not want to see recycling go down. 3 Mayor Chilton said that, based upon the reading of the interlocal agreement that the 4 agreement calls for any party that is going to withdraw to give formal written notice to other 5 governments involved in the agreement. He said that the way he reads it is that one of the 6 implications of this is if the County no longer provides a landfill for the Towns to use, then the 7 Towns are entitled to a certain amount of notice in terms of the agreement. He said that there 8 has never been a formal notice from the County of the intention to discontinue providing this 9 service. He said that he believes there is a considerable extra cost to the citizens of Carrboro 10 because of the County's decision. 11 Chair Pelissier said that the landfill is going to close and it was just a matter of a 12 difference in timing. 13 Mayor Chilton said that the agreement calls for a certain amount of notice. He said that 14 the Town has not received a formal notice about not continuing to provide this service to the 15 Town of Carrboro. 16 Orange County Staff Attorney Sahana Ayers said that the interlocal agreement does not 17 address the end of the life closure of the landfill itself. She does not think that the County has 18 the responsibility to give notice about something that is not in the interlocal agreement. 19 Mayor Chilton said that this is a viewpoint that he expected the County Attorney to take, 20 but his responsibility is to the taxpayers of Carrboro and he reads the document differently. 21 In answer to a question about the Solid Waste Advisory Board, Commissioner Yuhasz 22 said that the SWAB has not met for the last two meeting times because without there being a 23 decision about Chapel Hill moving forward, there is very little to discuss. 24 Alderman O'Donnell said that she stood behind Mayor Chilton in that there should be a 25 conversation about this soon regarding the Solid Waste Interlocal Agreement; a scheduled 26 meeting. 27 Commissioner Jacobs said that the Board of County Commissioners was not unanimous 28 and he wished that these meetings were used to find a positive way to move forward. He said 29 that with all of these issues, they need to find common ground. He is an advocate of trying to 30 find combined services for citizens. He asked Solid Waste Director Gayle Wilson to talk about 31 the waste reduction. 32 Gayle Wilson said that Orange County is at about 55% waste reduction and the 33 disruption in solid waste disposal may cause a blip, but he hopes not. They are continuing to 34 move forward toward the final goal. 35 Commissioner Yuhasz said that regardless of what solid waste solution is decided upon, 36 there needs to be a central collection place in Orange County, or it needs to be transferred to 37 some other location. 38 39 5. Historic Roqers Road Neiqhborhood 40 Michael Talbert said that in 1972 the landfill was opened by the Town of Chapel Hill and 41 in 1999 Orange County assumed ownership and operation of the Orange County Landfill on 42 Eubanks Road. The Historic Rogers Road Community has lived with the Orange County Landfill 43 for 40 years. 44 On May 17, 2011 the Board of Commissioners received a plan from Rogers-Eubanks 45 Neighborhood Association (RENA) recommending actions to mitigate the long and short term 46 impacts of Orange County's Landfill and Solid Waste operations on the health, safety and 47 welfare of the Historic Rogers Road — Eubanks Road community. 48 On January 26, 2012 the Board of Commissioners and the Town Boards discussed the 49 extension of sewer service and a community center for the Historic Rogers Road Community. 50 County and Town Attorneys have concluded that utilization of Solid Waste reserves to extend 11 1 sewer service to the Historic Rogers Road Community is not consistent with North Carolina 2 General Statutes and would subject the local governments to legal challenges. Therefore, 3 funding for either the extension of sewer services and/or a community center will have to come 4 from the County's and Towns' other general revenue sources. 5 On February 21, 2012 the Orange County Board of Commissioners authorized the 6 creation of a new Historic Rogers Road Neighborhood Task Force to address sewer service 7 and a community center. 8 On September 6, 2012 the Board of County Commissioners reviewed the Interim Report 9 from the Historic Rogers Road Neighborhood Task Force and approved the following motion: 10 11 The motion was made by Commissioner Hemminger and seconded by Commissioner 12 Yuhasz, for intent to: 13 • move forward with a new"green" community center; 14 • to ask the Manager to find $380,000 more to move into the fund already 15 established with $120,000; 16 • to work with RENA and Habitat for Humanity on the design and implementation 17 of this community center; 18 • to ask the towns to contribute computers, supplies, permitting costs, connection 19 costs and the first 12 months of utilities towards this project; 20 • to ask the towns to expedite the permitting process; and 21 • to be able to start immediately to bring this project back 22 23 On October 3, 2012 the Historic Rogers Road Neighborhood Task Force met and 24 discussed the attached recommendations from the County and Town Managers. Based on the 25 draft Meeting Summary the Task Force reinforced support for both the Community Center and 26 Sewer in the Historic Rogers Road Community, by the recommending the following: 27 28 1. That the Managers meet and report back to the Task Force at the October 24, 2012 29 meeting, specifically to study how the local governments can cost-share sewer 30 improvements and a community center. 31 2. That the Managers consider the attached "Carrboro" cost sharing option. 32 3. That the Task Force move forward with the Community Center and continue discussions as 33 to how sewer is implemented. 34 35 The Historic Rogers Road Neighborhood Task Force is scheduled to present its final 36 report to the Assembly of Governments on December 6, 2012. 37 38 Commissioner Hemminger made reference to the idea of moving the historic Hogan 39 House and said that the church will move the property and save it to be restored on its own 40 property. 41 Mayor Chilton said that the Town of Carrboro is not an entitlement fund community but 42 the Town of Chapel Hill is. He thinks that this is worthy of being looked into further. 43 Commissioner Hemminger said that there are certain ratios and this neighborhood did 44 not meet the ratios. 45 Mayor Chilton said that extending sewer lines to low-income neighborhoods is 46 something that CDBG money does qualify for, generally speaking. 47 Michael Talbert said that none of this area is within the town limits of Chapel Hill, it is all 48 under the ETJ therefore it would not qualify for entitlement money. Regarding funding for 49 sewer, there is not massive failure of all of the systems out there and most of the homeowners 50 have functional septic systems. 12 1 Discussion ensued about the lack of interest in tapping into a sewer system in this area. 2 The meeting adjourned at 9:59 PM. 3 4 Bernadette Pelissier, Chair 5 6 Donna S. Baker, CMC 7 Clerk to the Board