HomeMy WebLinkAboutORD-2001-030 Orange County Subdivision Amendments Modify Section IV-B-3 _
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ORANGE COUNTY
SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS
SECTION IV-13-110 D.4 FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT
STREETSTANDARDS
THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF ORANGE COUNTY ORDAINS THAT THE SUBDIVISION
REGULATIONS ARE HEREBY AMENDED AS FOLLOWS:
(Bold underlined print indicates language to be added. Bold strikethFough print
indicates language to be deleted.)
CONSISTENT WITH AMENDMENTS TO ORANGE COUNTY SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS APPENDIX A
ADOPTED OCTOBER 10, 2000, SECTION IV-13-1 0 DA. FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT, STREET
STANDARDS, IS AMENDED AS FOLLOWS:
(IV-B-10. FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT)
D.4 Street Standards
All streets in Flexible Developments shall conform to the standards.contained in Section
IV-13-3 of this Ordinance, provided, however, private roads will be permitted as follows:
The number of lots served by a private road shall be limited as follows. as
specified by, the Orange Counly Private Road Standards in Appendix A. o
this ordinance
Class of Lot-
Class 10 to 25
Where a Flexible Development has 26. 12 lots or less, the street system may
consist of different classes of private roads provided 6 logical hierarchy of private
roads is planned, with those of lower classification connecting to those of higher
Where a Flexible Development has more than -26 12 lots, the stre et system may
consist of public streets and private roads provided:
0 The street system in the development forms a logical hierarchy of
thoroughfares with streets of lower classification connecting to streets of
higher-classification;
0 The development contains no more than 50 lots;
0 All entrance roads serving the development are public streets;
0 All streets which stub-out at property lines-lo provide for the extension of or
connection to future street systems are public streets; and
0 Private roads are not proposed as part of a Village (Section DA) except in the
Village Conservancy portion of the development.
• Private, dead-end roads may be terminated in a cul-de-sac or "T" turnaround.
Where a "T" turnaround is used as the terminus for a private road, the
dimensions (e.g., turning radius) of the "T" shall be sufficient to allow emergency
service and trash collection vehicles adequate room to turn around.
• Existing street rights-of-way may not count toward the minimum thirty-three
percent (33%) open space requirement. However, new street rights-of-way may
be counted but only to the extent that they are required to pass through or by
open space uses as defined herein to link one buildable portion of a site with
another; and they are located and/or constructed so as to have no adverse'
impacts on Primary and Secondary Conservation Areas.
This ordinance shall become effective upon adoption.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Orange County Commissioners
that this Zoning Atlas Amendment is effective upon approval.
Upon motion of Commissioner Laak- _, seconded by Commissioner
the foregoing ordinance was adopted this the day of
2001.
1, Beverly A. Blythe, Clerk to the Board of Commissioners for the County of
Orange, North Carolina, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing is a true copy of so
much of the proceedings of said Board at a meeting held on Z1 2001 as
relates in any way to the adoption of the foregoing and that said proceedings are
recorded in Minute Book No.2/ of the minutes of said Board.
WITNESS my hand and the seal of said County, this day ok
20096
'Clerk - V
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ORANGE COUNTY
SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS IV-13-3 STREETS,
SECTION IV-13-3-a AND SECTION IV-B-3-b
THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF ORANGE COUNTY ORDAINS THAT THE SUBDIVISION
REGULATIONS ARE HEREBY AMENDED AS FOLLOWS:
(Bold print indicates language to be added. StFil<ethmu print indicates language to
be deleted.)
ORANGE COUNTY SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS, SECTION IV-13-3 STREETS, IS AMENDED TO READ AS
FOLLOWS:
IV-B-3. STREETS
*IV-13-3-a. The provision of street rights-of-way shall conform to and meet the
*Amended requirements of such adopted Comprehensive Plan for Orange County as
4/4/88 may be recommended by the Planning Board and adopted by the Orange
County Board of County Commissioners, from its date of adoption,
including,.where appropriate, reservation for or dedication of street
rights-of-way for future transportation facilities proposed in the
Comprehensive Plan., PFSVided that a-A subdivider shall not be required
to provide or dedicate right-of-way for a proposed street to which access
would be prohibited by any governmental agency.
*IV-B-3-b. All subdivisions shall have a coordinated street system via-a with public or
*Amended private streets that and access a public, state, e municipal street or a
public, State maintained street.
10/16/90 A coordinated street system shall consider the following:
(a) Public street rights-of-way shall abut adjacent properties as
necessary to provide connectivity to the countywide
transportation network; and
(b)Lot access to streets serving the subdivision shall be limited in
the case of streets that provide sonnestw+ty a link between two or
more roads designated in the Comprehensive Plan as arterials or
collectors.
(eff.12/3/90) All subdivisions G9Rt niRg Private stFe shall have at least one street
which intersects with or joins aR extension ^{ a public, state, eF municipal street or a
public, State maintained street.,
This ordinance shall become effective upon adoption.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Orange County Commissioners
that this Zoning Atlas Amendment is effective upon approval.
Upon motion of Commissioner co , seconded by Commissioner
the foregoing ordinance was adopted this the day of e , 2001.
1, Beverly A. Blythe, Clerk to the Board of Commissioners for the County of
/
Orange, North Carolina, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing is a true copy of so
much of the proceedings of said Board at a meeting held on ////F 2001 as
relates in any way to the adoption of the foregoing and that said proceedings are
recorded in Minute Book No. 51 of the minutes of said Board.
WITNESS my hand and the-seal of said County, this day of r-atc�—
Clerk to th/e Board of Comimissioners
. 1
ORANGE COUNTY
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
ACTION AGENDA ITEM ABSTRACT
Meeting Date: November 19, 2001
Action Agenda
Item No.
SUBJECT: Amendments to Orange County Subdivision Regulations-Section IV-B-3 to
Clarify Provisions for Street Rights-of-Way and Coordinated Street System
DEPARTMENT: Planning PUBLIC HEARING: Y/N No
INFORMATION CONTACT:
ATTACHMENT(S): Craig Benedict, ext. 2592
1. Ordinance Amending the Orange County Karen Lincoln, ext. 2594
Subdivision Regulations
2. October 3, 2001, Planning Board Minutes TELEPHONE NUMBERS:
Hillsborough 732-8181
Chapel Hill 968-4501
Durham 688-7331
Durham 688-7331
PURPOSE: To consider proposed amendments to the Orange County Subdivision
Regulations Section IV-13-3 Streets, to clarify:
1. Section IV-13-3-a, provision of streets rights-of-way ; and
2. Section IV-B-3.b, provision for a coordinated street system.
BACKGROUND: Subdivision Regulations require provision of street rights-of-way and that
all subdivisions to have "a coordinated street system via a public or private street ..".
Proposed amendments would clarify:
1. Provision of streets right-of-way includes rights-of-way for proposed future transportation
facilities included in adopted local and regional transportation plans.
2. Provision for a coordinated street system includes:
• extension of subdivision public roads to developable adjacent lots or to connect with
existing public streets; and
• limited driveway access on major subdivision streets.
Planning staff presented the proposed amendments on September 27, 2001 at a joint public
hearing before the Orange County Board of County Commissioners and the Orange County
Planning Board. The Board of County Commissioners referred the amendments to the
Planning Board for its recommendation. The Planning Board considered the proposed
amendments at its meeting on October 3, 2001, and voted unanimously to recommend that
the Board of County Commissioners adopt the amendments.
FINANCIAL IMPACT: There is no immediate financial impact associated with this decision
item.
2
RECOMMENDATION(S): Planning Board Recommendation: The Planning Board
unanimously recommends that the Board of County
Commissioners adopt the proposed amendments.
Administration Recommendation: The Administration
recommends that the Board of County Commissioners adopt the
proposed amendments.
3
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ORANGE COUNTY
SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS IV-13-3 STREETS,
SECTION IV-B��AND SECTION IV-B-3-b
THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF ORANGE COUNTY ORDAINS THAT THE SUBDIVISION
REGULATIONS ARE HEREBY AMENDED AS FOLLOWS:
(Bold print indicates language to be added. StFikethmu print indicates language to
be deleted.)
ORANGE COUNTY SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS, SECTION IV-13-3 STREETS, IS AMENDED TO READ AS
FOLLOWS:
IV-B-3. STREETS
IV-B-3-a. The provision of street rights-of-way shall conform to and meet the
*Amended requirements of such adopted Comprehensive Plan for Orange County as
4/4/88 may be recommended by the Planning Board and adopted by the Orange
County Board of County Commissioners, from its date of adoption,
including, where appropriate, reservation for or dedication of street
rights-of-way for future transportation facilities proposed in the
Comprehensive Plan., preyided that a A subdivider shall not be required
to provide or dedicate right-of-way for a proposed street to which access
would be prohibited by any governmental agency.
IV-B-3-b. All subdivisions shall have a coordinated street system v4a-a with public or
*Amended private streets that aPA access a public, state, e municipal street or a
public, State maintained street.
10/16/90 A coordinated street system shall consider the following:
(a) Public street rights-of-way shall abut adjacent properties as
necessary to provide connectivity to the countywide
transportation network; and
(b) Lot access to streets serving the subdivision shall-be limited in
the case of streets that provide eenneetivity a link between two or
more roads designated in the Comprehensive Plan as arterials or
collectors.
(eff.12/3/90) All subdivisions eentaining pFivate StFe shall have at least one street
which intersects with or joins an ex4ensien a public, state, e municipal street or a
public, State maintained street., eF anetheF pFiyate read.
This ordinance shall become effective upon adoption.
4
NOW THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Orange County Commissioners
that this Zoning Atlas Amendment is effective upon-approval.
Upon motion of Commissioner , seconded by Commissioner ,
the foregoing ordinance was adopted this the day of , 2001.
I, Beverly A. Blythe, Clerk to the Board of Commissioners for the County of
Orange, North Carolina, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing is a true copy of so
much of the proceedings of said Board at a meeting held on , 2001 as
relates in any way to the adoption of the foregoing and that said proceedings are
recorded in Minute Book No. of the minutes of said Board.
WITNESS my hand and the seal of said County, this day of ,
2001.
Clerk to the Board of Commissioners
5
MINUTES
ORANGE COUNTY PLANNING BOARD
OCTOBER 3,2001
7:30 p.m.
MEMBERS PRESENT: Nicole Gooding-Ray(Chair),Crauford Goodwin,Howard McAdams,
Rachel Preston,Hunter Schofield,Bob Strayhorn,Maria Tadd and
Theodore Triebel.
MEMBERS ABSENT: Barry Katz(excused),James Selkirk(excused),and Lynn Holtkamp
(unexcused)
STAFF PRESENT: Planning Director Craig Benedict,Joanna Bradshaw,Aaron Cain,Robert
Davis,Tom King,Eddie Kirk,Tina Moon
AGENDA ITEM#1: CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL
Chair Gooding-Ray balled the meeting to order.
AGENDA ITEM#2: ADDITIONS OR CHANGES TO THE AGENDA
Rachel Preston nominated Hunter Schofield for Vice Chair of the Planning
Board.
VOTE: Unanimous
AGENDA ITEM#3: APPROVAL OF MINUTES—September 5,2001
MOTION: McAdams moved approval of the minutes for September 5,2001. Seconded
by Schofield.
VOTE: Unanimous.
AGENDA ITEM#4: COMMISSIONERS'MEETING ACTION REPORTS
None available.
AGENDA ITEM#5: PUBLIC CHARGE
Chair Gooding-Ray read the public charge.
AGENDA ITEM#6: CHAIR COMMENTS
Chair Gooding-Ray asked for a moment of silence to reflect on the sad
events of September 11,2001.
AGENDA ITEM#7: COMMITTEE/ADVISORY BOARD REPORTS
a. Board of Adjustment—McAdams reported that one case was
continued from the previous month and it was withdrawn. Another case
was continued for two months.
b. Agricultural Preservation Board—Strayhom was not able to attend
the meeting.
Comprehensive Plan Update—Benedict reported that a process would begin on October 22nd with a work
session with the Board of County Commissioners on sustainability. There will be a town meeting on
November 26"'during the regular quarterly public hearing on met earlier
MOTION: Schofield moved to send the application back to the staff for further adjustment. Seconded by
|
/
AGENDA ITEM#9: MATTERS BEARD AT PUBLIC BEARING(AUGUST 27,2001)
a. Orange County Subdivision Amendments
1. Amend Section IV-B-3 to Clarify Provisions for Street Rights-of-
Way and Coordinated System
Lincoln said that the purpose of this item was for the board to make a recommendation to forward to the
Board of County Commissioners regarding the subdivision amendments. Staff is recommending that the
Planning Board recommend that the Board of County Commissioners adopt these amendments.
MOTION: McAdams moved to forward a recommendation for approval of the proposed amendments to
be adopted by the Board of County Commissioners. Seconded by Tadd.
VOTE: Unanimous
2. Amendments Consistent with Private Road Standards Adopted
This item is to make the number of lots on a private r6ad on a flexible development plan consistent with what
was approved last October. This was an oversight.
MOTION: Schofield moved to forward a recommendation for approval of the proposed amendments to
be adopted by the Board of County Commissioners. Seconded by Preston.
VOTE: Unanimous
3 .b l 069
0 A k) - 2�43
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ORANGE COUNTY
SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS
SECTION IV-B-10 D.4 FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT
STREET STANDARDS
THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF ORANGE COUNTY ORDAINS THAT THE SUBDIVISION
REGULATIONS ARE HEREBY AMENDED AS FOLLOWS:
(gold underlined print indicates language to be added. Feld-StFikethFeU print
indicates language to be deleted.)
CONSISTENT WITH AMENDMENTS TO ORANGE COUNTY SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS APPENDIX A
ADOPTED OCTOBER 10, 2000, SECTION IV-13-10 %.D.4. FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT, STREET
STANDARDS, IS AMENDED AS FOLLOWS:
(IV-13-10. FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT)
D.4 Street Standards
All streets in Flexible Developments shall conform to the standards contained in Section
IV-131-3 of this Ordinance, provided, however, private roads will be permitted as follows:
• The number of lots served by a private road shall be limited as fellews-i-as
specified by the Orange County Private Road Standards in Appendix A. of
this ordinance
Read Numbe
Class of Lets
Claus-G 1 to-3
Glass 8 4 to-9
Glass-A 10 to 26
• Where a Flexible Development has 2-6 12 lots or less, the street system may
consist of different classes of private roads provided a logical hierarchy of private
roads is planned, with those of lower classification connecting to those of higher
classification;
• Where a Flexible Development has more than 26 12 lots, the street system may
consist of public streets and private roads provided:
0 The street system in the development forms a logical hierarchy of
thoroughfares with streets of lower classification connecting to streets of
higher classification;
070 3
0 The development contains no more than 50 lots;
0 All entrance roads serving the development are public streets;
0 All streets which stub-out at property lines to provide for the extension of or
connection to future street systems are public streets; and
0 Private roads are not proposed as part of a Village (Section DA) except in the
Village Conservancy portion of the development.
• Private, dead-end roads may be terminated in a cul-de-sac or "T" turnaround.
Where a "T" turnaround is used as the terminus for a private road, the
dimensions (e.g., turning radius) of the "T"`shall be sufficient to allow emergency
service and trash collection vehicles adequate room to turn around.
• Existing street rights-of-way may not count toward the minimum thirty-three
percent (33%) open space requirement. However, new street rights-of-way may
be counted but only to the extent that they are required to pass through or by
open space uses as defined herein to link one buildable portion of a site with
another; and they are located and/or constructed so as to have no adverse
impacts on Primary and Secondary Conservation Areas.
This ordinance shall become effective upon adoption.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Orange County Commissioners
that this Zoning Atlas Amendment is effective upon approval.
Upon motion of Commissioner , seconded by Commissioner
, the foregoing ordinance was adopted this the day of
2001.
1, Beverly A. Blythe, Clerk to the Board of Commissioners for the County of
Orange, North Carolina, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing is a true copy of so
much of the proceedings of said Board at a meeting held on , 2001 as
relates in any way to the adoption of the foregoing and that said proceedings are
recorded in Minute Book No. of the minutes of said Board.
WITNESS my hand and the seal of said County, this day of. ,
2001.
Of' 1067
ORANGE COUNTY
BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
ORANGE COUNTY PLANNING BOARD
PUBLIC HEARING AGENDA ITEM ABSTRACT
Meeting Date: August 27, 2001
Action Agenda
Item No. La-b44
SUBJECT: Amendments to Flexible Development Street Standards Consistent with
Private Road Standards Adopted 10-10-00.
DEPARTMENT: Planning PUBLIC HEARING: Y/N YES
INFORMATION CONTACT:
ATTACHMENT(S): Craig Benedict, ext. 2592
1. Ordinance Amending the Orange County Karen Lincoln, ext. 2594
Subdivision Regulations
Section IV-B-10 D.4 TELEPHONE NUMBERS:
Hillsborough 732-8181
Chapel Hill 968-4501
Durham 688-7331
Durham 688-7331
PURPOSE: To receive citizen comment on proposed amendments to Orange County Subdivision
Regulations Section IV-13-10 D.4, Flexible. Development Street Standards.
These are not new changes, but a re-editing of a separate section of the subdivision
regulations to conform to what was previously adopted.
BACKGROUND: The Orange County Board of County Commissioners, on October 10,
2000, adopted amendments to the Orange County Subdivision Regulations, Appendix A
Orange County Private Road Standards, to reduce the number of lots on a private road.from
25 to 12; eliminate the class C private road provision- and to reduce the number of lots on a
class B private road from 9 to 5. Street standards (Subsection DA) in Section IV-13-10
Flexible Development that mimic language in the Orange County Private Road Standards are
now not consistent with the newly adopted amendments. Proposed amendments (page 2)
will make Section IV-13-10 DA consistent with Appendix A Orange County Private Road
Standards,
FINANCIAL IMPACT: There is no immediate financial impact associated with this
decision item.
RECOMMENDATION(S): The Administration recommends that the Board refer the proposed
amendments to the Planning Board for a recommendation to be returned to the Board of
Commissioners no sooner than October 16, 2001.
g:\transportation\privateroads\flex_dev_8-27phabs.doc
9- a�- o
C3 6 `
A motion was made by Commissioner Jacobs, seconded by Commissioner Gordon to refer the
proposed amendments to the Planning Board for a recommendation to be returned to the Board of
Commissioners no sooner than October 2, 2001.
VOTE: UNANIMOUS
b. Amend Flexible Development Street Standards
1. Amend Section IV-13-10 DA
Craig Benedict said that the County Commissioners on October 10, 2000, adopted
amendments to the Orange County Subdivision Regulations, Appendix A Orange County Private Road
Standards, to reduce the number of lots on a private road from 25 to 12; eliminate the class C private road
provision; and to reduce the number of lots on a class B private road from 9 to 5. Street standards
(Subsection D.4) in Section IV-13-10 Flexible Development that mimic language in the Orange County Private
Road Standards are now not consistent with the newly adopted amendments. Proposed amendments will
make Section IV-B-10 DA consistent with Appendix A Orange County Private Road Standards.
There were no public comments.
A motion was made by Commissioner Jacobs, seconded by Commissioner Gordon to close the
public hearing.
VOTE: UNANIMOUS
A motion was made by Commissioner Gordon, seconded by Commissioner Jacobs to refer the
proposed amendments to the Planning Board for a recommendation to be returned to the Board of
Commissioners no sooner than October 16, 2001.
VOTE: UNANIMOUS
4. ORANGE COUNTY ZONING ATLAS AMENDMENT
a. Zoning Atlas Amendment to rezone from EC-5 to R-1
Craig Benedict made this presentation. This item is a request from a private citizen, Ann Joyner,
for a zoning atlas amendment from an EC-5 (Existing Commercial district 5 property)to an R-1 category
(Rural Residential). The property owners are listed in the abstract. The size of the parcel is 1.05 acres. The
property is located on the west side of Dodson's Crossroads. He said that EC-5 designations were added to
the map when zoning went into effect in the various townships. There are approximately 75 EC-5
designations because they did not conform to an area that would typically be applicable for a commercial
use. The zoning atlas amendment is nestled within a subdivision change, which is not the topic of the public
hearing. There is another request with a suggestion to put a residence on lot 1 of the Blueberry Hill
subdivision along with the extinguishing of the EC-5 to the R-1. The interesting point about this lot is that
when it was recorded in 1986, it was shown as a private park. A homeowner's association was not
developed so there is some question about the purpose of the private park.
Ann Joyner said that she feels that the EC-5 designation is inconsistent with the surrounding
areas and removal of the zoning district from this residential and farming area is a reasonable action.
However, the zoning officer's recommendation that this be done for the private park purposes as shown on
the Board of County Commissioners' approved preliminary plat and existing recording plat of Blueberry Hills
subdivision has nothing to do with her request. She requested the zoning change to only go forward if it
could be simultaneous with removing the park designation. She asked the County Commissioners to
approve the petition to rezone to R-1 without reference to the private park. She said that this problem arose
originally because of a mistake that she made in 1986. She said that the reason the words, "park, private"
were put in there was to buffer the EC-5 parcel because at that point they envisioned using it as commercial
and wanted to buffer it and she did not know the difference between open space and park. She added that
the County did not request the park designation. There are signed affidavits from all of the lot owners in the
subdivision saying that they have no rights to the park. She has been paying $492 per year in taxes on this
lot with which they can do nothing because of the park designation.
Craig Benedict said that no action would be taken on this but that it would be referred to the
8
The Board approved a petition from the North Carolina Department of Transportation for
abandonment of Clyde Road in Chapel Hill Township from the state secondary road maintenance
program.
i. Amendments to Orancte County Subdivision Regulations Section IV-B-3 to Clarify
Provisions for Street`Riahts-of way and Coordinated Street System
The Board adopted the proposed amendments to the Orange County subdivision regulations
to clarify section IV-B-3-a, provision of streets rights-of-way,and section IV-B-3'-b, provision for a
coordinated street system.
L Amendments to Flexible Development Street Standards Consistent with Private Road
Standards Adopted October 10, 2000
The Board approved proposed amendments to the Orange County subdivision regulations,
section IV-13-1 0.4, flexible development street standards.
k. Appointment to Carrboro Board of Adjustment
The Board appointed John 1. Ring to the Carrboro Board of Adjustment for a term ending
February 28, 2004.
1 Appointment to Orange Community Housing and Land Trust(OCHLTI
The Board'appointed Garry Sronce to the Orange Community Housing and Land Trust for a
term ending at the first Annual Meeting, spring, 2002.
m. Appointment to the Carrboro Committee to Preserve the Adams Property,on Bolin
Creek The Board appointed Rich Shaw as the County Commissioners representative to the
Carrboro's Committee to Preserve the Adams Property on Bolin Creek.
n. Appointment to the Hiillsborouah Board of Adjustment to an Extraterritorial Jurisdiction
(ETJ) Position
The Board removed this item for separate consideration at the end of the Consent Agenda.
VOTE ON THE CONSENT AGENDA: UNANIMOUS
ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA
e. HOME Proctram -Property Acciuisition
The Board considered authorizing a,development agreement with the Town of Chapel Hill on
behalf of the Orange County HOME Consortium for the acquisition of rental property in Chapel Hill.
Commissioner Jacobs said that he recalls approving$75,000 for a similar single unit rental
property acquisition also in Chapel Hill. This seems like a tremendous expenditure to benefit a single
family. He suggested that the$75,000 in bond monies could be better spent for some other projects
proposed or the monies held until they could be used to benefit more people. He asked that the
Affordable Housing Advisory Board review this project and provide any recommendations about the
appropriation of the $75,000.
Commissioner Brown suggested asking the Chapel Hill Department of Housing about this
property. Housing and Community Development Director Tara Fikes agreed to do this..
A motion was made by Commissioner Jacobs,seconded by Commissioner Brown to approve
expenditure of the HOME Consortium funds for the property acquisition and then get further information
and values regarding whether or not to expend bond funds on this as well.
VOTE: UNANIMOUS