Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutRES-2012-076 Resolution Detailing Orange County's Recommendations Regarding Goals for Inclusion of 2013-2014 Legislative Goals Package RES-2012-076 ORANGE COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS Resolution Detailing Orange County's Recommendations Regarding Goals for Inclusion in the North Carolina Association of County Commissioners' (NCACC) 2013-2014 Legislative Goals Package WHEREAS, the North Carolina Association of County Commissioners (NCACC) organizes a process every two years to develop a legislative goals package; and WHEREAS, the purpose of the package is to develop a consensus of broad support on legislative goals and issues for matters affecting North Carolina counties that may be addressed during the upcoming North Carolina General Assembly sessions during next two calendar years; and WHEREAS, the goals and issues included in NCACC package, with their broad support, guide and strengthen NCACC representatives and staff as they converse with individual legislators and committees on legislative matters; and WHEREAS, NCACC has begun the process to develop its 2013-2014 Legislative Goals Package and Orange County and all other North Carolina counties have been asked to submit proposed legislative goals by September 17, 2012 for consideration for inclusion in the 2013-2014 Legislative Goals Package; and WHEREAS, Orange County believes there are many issues of importance to all North Carolina counties that should be included as goals in NCACC's 2013-2014 Legislative Goals Package; NOW THEREFORE we, the Orange County Board of Commissioners, do hereby recommend that NCACC include the following goals in the NCACC 2013-2014 Legislative Goals Package: 1) Support the expansion of revenue options and protection of revenue sources available to county governments; 2) Support an independent Legislative Study regarding options for future transportation funding and continue to oppose legislation shifting the State's existing responsibility for funding transportation construction and maintenance projects to county governments without also providing counties the necessary additional revenue sources; 3) Support a statewide bond referendum to provide State assistance to meet public school and community college construction needs caused by increased enrollment, mandated reduction in class size and other factors; 4) Seek legislation to ensure that State-funded mental health, developmental disability, and substance abuse services are available, accessible and affordable to all residents and that sufficient state resources fund service provision costs inclusive of sufficient crisis beds; 5) Support legislation which streamlines the sales tax refund regulatory process by exempting public institutions (counties, cities, school boards, community colleges, local utility authorities, etc.) from payment of State and local sales taxes on purchases within North Carolina and thereby diminish the administrative burden on the local and State level to pursue/account for/recoup sales tax proceeds; and 6) Support legislation which provides county governments some opportunity to regulate and/or have input into, but not prohibit, bio-solids application activities, including the acceptable "classes" of bio-solids for application and the prohibition of bio-solids application in certain environmentally sensitive areas such as critical watersheds. The appropriate application of bio-solids for agricultural use should be allowed with counties playing a role in the process; 7) Support legislation to provide additional State compensation to municipalities and local fire districts providing fire protection to state- owned buildings; 8) Support actions to change North Carolina Division of Water Quality (DWQ) wastewater system classification rules which currently classify a spray irrigation system such as one utilized by volunteer fire departments as "commercial". When the flow generated by the system is domestic quality/non-industrial process wastewater, the system should be held to the same monitoring and testing standards as a residential wastewater system under DWQ jurisdiction. In the alternative, volunteer fire departments should be excluded entirely from the "commercial" classification. The annual inspections and testing costs associated with a "commercial" designation for a spray irrigation system serving a volunteer fire department can be several thousands of dollars. Accounting for the type of flow actually treated by a system rather than assigning a blanket "commercial" designation would significantly reduce volunteer fire departments' annual costs across the state; 9) Support revisions to the Homestead Exemption provisions of the Machinery Act to a) provide greater opportunities for low-income seniors to remain in their homes and not be displaced due to property tax burdens by approving a one-time ten percent (10%) increase in the income qualification standard; and maintaining the current provisions which increase the income qualification standard each year based on any cost-of-living adjustment made to the benefits under Titles 11 and XVI of the Social Security Act for the preceding calendar year; b) diminish the discriminatory features of the current exemption provisions relating to married couples by establishing graduated income qualification standards for single individuals versus married couples; and c) address the ineffectiveness of the exemption provisions in communities where property values increase at substantial rates over short periods of time by capping the increase in additional taxes to be paid to the increase in the Consumer Price Index (CPI) for the preceding year. 10)Support the streamlining of provisions requiring units of local government to prepare 10-year solid waste management plans in order to simplify the process, reduces costs, and produce results more relevant for local governments. Currently a plan and any changes to it, including three year mandated updates, must often be approved unnecessarily by multiple units of government, even those that may not utilize local waste disposal facilities. Additionally, a primary reason for requiring 10-year plans was to measure remaining landfill space to ensure the future space availability. Other State rules require an annual survey of all landfill facilities to calculate remaining space, and with modern Geographical Information Systems, there is no need for the 10 year plan to duplicate this effort; 1 1)Support legislation requiring an advance recycling fee (ARF) — for the collection and recycling of computer, television, cell phone and other discarded electronic equipment — to fund the shortfall from the existing producer responsibility funding. The producer responsibility provisions for electronics recycling require manufacturers to maintain records by category on equipment sales and pay corresponding fees to the State of North Carolina. The State in turn distributes those funds to North Carolina counties. The producer responsibility funds only cover a portion of the expenses that North Carolina counties incur for electronics recycling (Example: Orange County receives funding equal to approximately ten percent (10%) of its actual electronic recycling expenses); and 12)Support legislation enhancing river basin monitoring and streamline rule- making — enhance monitoring for all river basins in North Carolina and review the rule-making process to enhance regional cooperation. This the 6th day of September 2012. Bernadette Pelissier, Chair Orange County Board of Commissioners