HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda - 09-18-2012 - 6c ORANGE COUNTY
BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
ACTION AGENDA ITEM ABSTRACT
Meeting Date: September 18, 2012
Action Agenda
Item No. 6-c
SUBJECT: Continued Public Hearing on Zoning Atlas Amendment— Darrell Chandler
Conditional Zoning — REDA-CZ-1
DEPARTMENT: Planning and Inspections PUBLIC HEARING: (Y/N) Yes
ATTACHMENTS: INFORMATION CONTACT:
1. Table Outlining Areas of Concern Michael D. Harvey, Planner III, 245-2597
2. Applicant's Written Response Craig Benedict, Director, 245-2575
3. Additional Staff Comments Received
after August 27, 2012 Public Hearing
PURPOSE: To continue a public hearing on a request submitted by Mr. Darrell Chandler to rezone
a 12 acre portion of a 35.8 acre parcel of property (PIN 0910-34-5040)to NC Highway 57 Speedway
Area Rural Economic Development Area (REDA-CZ-1) Conditional Zoning and receive site plan
approval for a proposed self-storage facility.
BACKGROUND: This item was presented at the August 27, 2012 Quarterly Public Hearing. During
the hearing BOCC and Planning Board members requested additional feedback from the applicant
on numerous concerns relating to the development of the project including, but not limited to:
1. Access management and internal traffic circulation concerns identified by Planning staff,
2. The lack of a proposed well and septic system for the property,
3. Concerns expressed by Orange County Erosion Control over the proposed stormwater
management system for the project
4. A lack of detail relating to the disposal of solid waste generated on the property,
5. Requested modifications to identified land use buffer requirements along NC Highway 57
and an adjoining AR zoned property,
6. Proposed impervious surface levels for the project.
Planning Board members requested additional direction from the BOCC on the appropriateness of
several aspects of the project to aid the Planning Board in its review, including the proposed land use
buffers.
The BOCC requested the applicant respond to these concerns in writing. The Board decided to
continue the public hearing at the September 18, 2012 meeting to allow the applicant time to
respond to the various comments and provide the BOCC an opportunity to provide additional
feedback and guidance on the project.
2
Attachment 1 includes a table outlining the various comments/concerns identified as part of the initial
review of the project as well as those made during the August 27, 2012 public hearing. Materials for
the public hearing are available on-line at http://orangecountync.gov/OCCLERKS/120827c2.pdf.
The table provides the applicant's suggestions on addressing these various concerns.
Attachment 2 contains the applicant's written responses to the questions and comments from the
public hearing. The applicant has provided a copy of the revised site plan for review in an 11" x 17"
format. Attachment 3 contains additional documentation from various County staff members
reviewing the project.
Conditional Zoning (CZ) Process: As articulated during the hearing, the CZ process involves
the approval of a rezoning petition and a site plan to allow for the development of a specific land
use on a parcel of property. Decisions on the viability of the proposal are based on the BOCC's
determination that the project is consistent with the intent of the Comprehensive Plan.
The normal cadence of review is as follows:
• CZ applications are reviewed during one of the four joint Quarterly Public Hearings held
by the Planning Board and the BOCC;
• The applicant is required to demonstrate that the project is consistent with the provisions
of the adopted Comprehensive Plan, is appropriate for the area in which it is located, and
embodies the overall spirit and intent of the various provisions of the Unified
Development Ordinance (UDO);
• The item will be forwarded to the Planning Board for a recommendation;
• The BOCC will receive the Planning Board recommendation and make a final
determination on the merits of the request.
Per Section 2.9.2 (F) (3) of the UDO, conditions can be imposed as part this process
only if they address:
1. The compatibility of the proposed development with surrounding property,
2. Proposed support facilities (i.e. roadways and access points, parking,
pedestrian and vehicular circulation systems, screening and buffer areas,
etc.) and/or
3. All other matters the County may find appropriate or the petitioner may
propose.
It should be noted all conditions must be agreed upon by the County and the applicant.
The applicant must agree in writing to the imposition of all conditions.
• If approved, the Zoning Atlas is amended and the zoning designation of the property shall
become REDA-CZ-1.
• The applicant shall be required to submit a final site plan in accordance within Section 2.5
of the UDO. This ensures that staff can verify all imposed conditions are adhered to and
allows for final peer review by members of the Development Advisory Committee (DAC)
as detailed within Section 1.9 of the UDO. There is, however, no additional site plan
review fee assessed to the applicant.
3
This is a somewhat unique and new process for the County. The CZ process is intended to
allow open dialogue and negotiation between the applicant and the County on the viability of the
proposed land use and the overall design of a given project.
The County is now, technically, in the negotiation phase of the project as the applicant is
seeking to modify existing development criteria staff has determined apply to the project, most
notably land use buffers. Through this negotiation process, additional conditions and
recommendations can be made to address various concerns and finalize the site plan.
As the County continues this review, staff will take note of potential procedural modifications
designed to streamline the process, allow for additional opportunity for dialogue amongst the
BOCC and the applicant on the project, and make the process more user friendly for all parties.
FINANCIAL IMPACT: This request has been reviewed by various County departments who
have determined that the approval or denial of the request would not create the need for
additional funding for the provision of County services.
RECOMMENDATION(S): The Manager recommends the Board:
1. Continue deliberation on the application and provide additional feedback on the project;
2. Refer the matter to the Planning Board with a request that a recommendation be returned
to the Board of Commissioners in time for the November 20, 2012 BOCC regular
meeting; and
3. Adjourn the public hearing until November 20, 2012 in order to receive the Planning
Board's recommendation and any submitted written comments.
4
Attachment 1
Synopsis of review comments/concerns related to Darrell Chandler project - request to
rezone a 12 acre portion of a 35.8 acre parcel of property to the NC Highway 57
Speedway Area Rural Economic Development Area (REDA-CZ-1) Conditional Zoning
district.
AREA OF COMMENTS: APPLICANT RESPONSE:
CONCERN:
Includes comments made during,
and staff comments identified
within the abstract for, the
August 27, 2012 Quarterly Public
Hearing
TRANSPORTATION The turn radius for the access drive Turn radius has been increased to
to the site is not adequate for address this concern. Orange
County Planning staff turning movements of larger County staff met with the applicant
comments were outlined vehicles, vehicles with trailers or on September 7, 2012 to review a
at August 27, 2012 public emergency vehicles. revised plan calling for the increase
hearing in turn radius around proposed
storage buildings as well as the
reduction in size of proposed
buildings to ensure adequate travel
way for vehicles.
Drive-aisle, including those areas in Drive-aisle width has been increased
between proposed units, are to 24 feet. The central drive-aisle
insufficient to allow for two-way has been increased to 25 feet to
traffic. accommodate Planning and
Emergency Management staff
One-way traffic is recommended recommendations.
around the proposed storage units.
The current location of the After reviewing pictures of the area
entrance/exit is extremely close to where the proposed driveway shall
the adjacent entrance for the be located (Refer to Attachment 2)
cement plant and existing foliage Planning staff determined during the
may obstruct drivers' view of on- September 7, 2012 meeting the drive
coming traffic. location was acceptable.
There appears to be insufficient The applicant has widened the
stacking space for vehicles driveway entrance and increased the
attempting to access the site. turn radius to accommodate
additional stacking based on staff
comments.
5
AREA OF COMMENTS: APPLICANT RESPONSE:
CONCERN:
Includes comments made during,
and staff comments identified
within the abstract for, the
August 27, 2012 Quarterly Public
Hearing
TRANSPORTATION Concerns were expressed over Sign locations have been modified to
Continued proposed sign locations. Staff ensure they are located outside of
wanted additional detail to ensure established site triangles.
proposed signs were not located
within established site triangles.
BOCC members expressed After reviewing pictures of the area
concerns over existing, mature, where the proposed driveway shall
foliage near the proposed entrance be located (Refer to Attachment 2)
and asked for clarification if the Planning staff determined during the
existing trees would block visibility September 7, 2012 meeting the drive
or create a hazard for large vehicles location was acceptable and the
attempting to access the site. foliage should not be an issue.
UTILITY SERVICE BOCC members requested written Please refer to Attachment 2 for
documentation from Orange County additional detail.
County Planning staff Health and Building Inspections that
comments were outlined a chemical or other toilet system
at August 27, 2012 public could be used to support the
hearing proposed office use.
BOCC and Planning Board The applicant is making the
members expressed reservations necessary application to the Orange
over the applicants desire not to County Health Department to
develop a well on the property. investigate the placement of a well
on the property.
Several comments were made over
the need for a well to provide water Additional information concerning
for staff, to clean the facility, and to this item is contained within
address emergencies. Attachment 2.
6
AREA OF COMMENTS: APPLICANT RESPONSE:
CONCERN:
Includes comments made during,
and staff comments identified
within the abstract for, the
August 27, 2012 Quarterly Public
Hearing
SOLID WASTE BOCC and Planning Board August 29, 2012: Applicant
members indicated the applicant informed staff the plan would be
County Planning staff should provide a dumpster area to revised to denote the location of a
indicated given the allow for the orderly collection and dumpster and general use recycling
numerous revisions to disposal of solid waste generated bin on the property.
the site plan, Orange on the property.
County Solid Waste had The dumpster would be screened
been unable to finalize with a fence in accordance with the
their comments in time provisions of the UDO.
for the August 27, 2012
public hearing given the
ever evolving nature of
the project
BOCC members wanted written Pending
comments from Orange County
Solid Waste on the applicant's
revised site plan with respect to the
adequacy of any dumpster located
on-site.
A Planning Board member wanted According to the applicant large
additional comment from the waste will be disposed of by a
applicant on how he intended to private contractor hired to haul away
address the disposal of large items waste. Waste will be disposed of in
left on the property by former accordance with the Orange County
tenants. Solid Waste Management
Ordinance.
EMERGENCY Emergency Management staff (EM) The site plan was modified to
MANAGEMENT indicated the need for 20 feet of address this concern. Drive-aisles
space in between each building and and spaces in-between storage
a minimum of 20 of drive-aisle width buildings have been increased to 24
to allow for the passage of feet to ensure proper separation to
emergency vehicles. facilitate emergency vehicle access.
7
AREA OF COMMENTS: APPLICANT RESPONSE:
CONCERN:
Includes comments made during,
and staff comments identified
within the abstract for, the
August 27, 2012 Quarterly Public
Hearing
EMERGENCY EM expressed concern over turn The Turn radius has been increased
MANAGEMENT radiuses at the north-western to address this concern.
Continued portions of the project, along NC
Highway 57, as it would be difficult
to get emergency vehicles through
the area.
LAND USE BUFFER BOCC members expressed concern Please refer to response contained
over the proposed clustering of within Attachment 2
foliage along NC Highway 57 and
Mile Branch Road rather than a
continuous land use buffer.
It was recommended that a
continuous vegetative buffer be
provided consistent with County
standards.
8
AREA OF COMMENTS: APPLICANT RESPONSE:
CONCERN:
Includes comments made during,
and staff comments identified
within the abstract for, the
August 27, 2012 Quarterly Public
Hearing
LAND USE BUFFER There was a lack of consensus over Please refer to response contained
Continued the appropriateness of proposed within Attachment 2
land use buffer widths along
adjacent roadways and residentially
zoned properties.
The applicant proposed the
following:
• 20 Foot Type A buffer along
NC 57 and Mile Branch Road,
• 10 foot buffer along the
southern property line adjacent
to the Wilson property (PIN
0910-22-6989)
• No land use buffer along the
portion of property abutting the
existing concrete plant.
Staff indicated typical land use
buffers for a self-storage facility in
comparable general use zoning
districts were:
1. Type F buffer, 100 feet in
width, along adjacent
property lines abutting AR
zoned property, and
2. Type B buffer, 30 feet in
width, abutting adjacent road
rights-of-way.
Staff and Planning Board members
asked for direction from the BOCC
on this issue.
9
AREA OF COMMENTS: APPLICANT RESPONSE:
CONCERN:
Includes comments made during,
and staff comments identified
within the abstract for, the
August 27, 2012 Quarterly Public
Hearing
LAND USE BUFFER BOCC members asked staff to Staff completed a site visit on
Continued complete a field survey on an September 7, 2012 and determined
adjoining residentially zoned the property is undeveloped.
property to verify if it was
undeveloped at this time.
STORMWATER BOCC members wanted additional The site plan has been revised to
Continued explanation from the applicant on denote the proposed stormwater
the proposed stormwater management system. This system
management system. has been deemed adequate by
County Erosion Control staff.
BOCC and Planning Board The site plan was revised to include
members requested additional this detail.
detail on the site plan denoting
drainage points on the property.
This request was made after the
project engineer indicated the
property would actually drain from
multiple locations due to existing
and proposed topography.
BOCC members wanted additional Attachment 3 contains an e-mail
written comments from Orange from Terry Hacket, Orange County
County Erosion Control on the Erosion Control, signifying his review
proposed stormwater system and and preliminary approval of the
the appropriateness of runoff system.
draining into existing ponds on the
property, north of Mile Branch
Road.
10
AREA OF COMMENTS: APPLICANT RESPONSE:
CONCERN:
Includes comments made during,
and staff comments identified
within the abstract for, the
August 27, 2012 Quarterly Public
Hearing
IMPERVIOUS BOCC members requested Please refer to Attachment 2. From
SURFACE AREA additional comments from the staff's perspective there will be a
applicant on the intended means of permit/declaration of restrictions
restricting impervious surface area recorded in the Orange County
on the property. Registrar of Deeds office if this
request is approved denoting
allowable levels of impervious
surface area for the project.
A BOCC member indicated concern
over placing so much impervious
surface area on the 4 acre portion
of the property west of Mile Branch.
LAND USE There was consensus that the
proposed use was acceptable.
BOCC members asked for Notes were added to the site plan.
clarification from the application on Retail operations would be limited to
the extent of retail operations. The packaging materials (i.e. boxes,
Board want to be sure all retail tape, etc.) necessary to support the
would be connected to the self- self-storage operation. There would
storage operation. not be additional sale of items (i.e.
drinks, food, snacks, etc.) not
necessary to support the proposed
land use.
Attachment 2
b
,II 6
A ! 11111116,
i 1,,,,, k a
10 Ur lIT
1
919.732,3883 SUMMIT-ENGINEER.COM
to t
DESIGN AND ENGINEERING SERVICES 504 Meadowtand Drive, Hillsborough,NC 27278
September 11, 2012
Mr. Michael Harvey
Orange County
Planning Department
PO Box 8181
Hillsborough, NC 27278
Re: Responses to Comments/Concerns
Mr. Harvey:
On behalf of our client and the applicant, Mr. Darrell Chandler, Summit Design and
Engineering Services is providing responses to all comments/concerns discussed at the
August 27, 2012 Quarterly Public Hearing and as noted from staff in subsequent
meetings.
Summit Design and Engineering Services will be more than happy to address and provide
any clarification needed on the attached responses and looks forward to discussing these
matters with you or the respective review agencies and boards further.
Sincerely,
,UMMI)D ESIG, AND ENGINEERENGINEERING SERVICES
,......__
.„--
,--
.._.,- ----
Chad E. Abbott, P.E.
Project Engineer
12
Responses to Emergency Services will be in Bold Red Italics.
1. Emergency Management Staff (EM) indicated the need for 20 feet of space
between each building and a minimum of 20 of drive-aisle width to allow for the
passage of emergency vehicles.
Per Discussions w/Mr.David Sykes at 11:00 a.m. on September 5, 2012, this was
discussed and noted as an informational comment as all drawings that have been
submitted meet this criteria.
2. EM expressed concern over turn radiuses at the north-western portions of the
project, along NC Highway 57, as it would be difficult to get emergency vehicles
through the area.
At the referenced meeting, we reviewed the plans issued to the BOCC and discussed at
the August 27, 2012 Quarterly Public Hearing. These plans provide for 50'radii at all
corners of the site and implement a 25'center isle separating dissecting the overall
length of the proposed storage units. The plans that generated the comment above
consisted of a solid row of storage buildings that had no breaks mid site and also
extended to maintain only the requested 20'drive width at the corners. The new radii
as shown resulted in the removal of several end units on the outermost rows where
there are acute angles.Mr. Sykes indicated his concurrence with the revised plans that
the BOCC has reviewed and will be providing written confirmation to the county
planning dept.
Responses to Transportation will be in Bold Blue Italics.
1. The turn radius for the access drive to the site is not adequate for turning
movements of larger vehicles, vehicles with trailers or emergency vehicles.
The drive has been widened and a 30'Radii provided. Per discussion w/Mr. Tom
Altieri, Ms.Darcy Zorio and Mr. Harvey at Orange County offices on September 7,
2012, this is acceptable to address the comment above.
2. Drive-aisle, including those areas in between proposed units, are insufficient to
allow for two-way traffic. One-way traffic is recommended around the proposed
storage units.
The interior drive isles between buildings have been widened to 24'and the exterior
loop around the buildings has been left at 20'. Per discussion w/Mr. Tom Altieri, Ms.
Darcy Zorio and Mr. Harvey at Orange County offices on September 7, 2012, this is
acceptable to address the comment above and allow for two-way traffic movements to
be allowed on site.
3. The current location of the entrance/exit is extremely close to the adjacent
entrance for the cement plant and existing foliage may obstruct drivers' view of
on-coming traffic.
Per discussion w/Mr. Tom Altieri, Ms. Darcy Zorio and Mr. Harvey at Orange County
offices on September 7, 2012,pictures of the field conditions were provided and the
entrance was reviewed in detail. Upon review, staff determined that the location of the
driveway was acceptable with respect to the adjacent drive and the existing vegetation.
13
4. There appears to be insufficient stacking space for vehicles attempting to access
the site.
The drive has been widened and a 30'Radii provided. Per discussion w/Mr. Tom
Altieri, Ms. Darcy Zorio and Mr. Harvey at Orange County offices on September 7,
2012, this is acceptable to address the comment above.
5. Proposed storage buildings are too close to property lines to allow for an
adequate drive aisle.
The buildings as shown of the current plan and the plans submitted to the BOCC and
Planning Board both show a reduction in end units to allow for adequate drive isles
and turning movements. A center drive isle of 25'was also added in response to these
comments prior to submitting to the BOCC and Planning Board. Per discussion w/Mr.
Tom Altieri, Ms. Darcy Zorio and Mr. Harvey at Orange County offices on September
7, 2012, this is acceptable to address the comment above.
6. Concerns were expressed over proposed sign locations. Staff wanted additional
detail to ensure proposed signs were not located within established site triangles.
Signs will not be allowed in the proposed site triangles in accordance with the approval
and permitting of the driveway by NCDOT. Per the proposed locations, signs are
located out of the site triangles and AASHTO Site Lines. Per discussion w/Mr. Tom
Altieri, Ms. Darcy Zorio and Mr. Harvey at Orange County offices on September 7,
2012, this is acceptable to address the comment above.
7. BOCC members expressed concerns over existing, mature, foliage near the
proposed entrance and asked for clarification if the existing trees would block
visibility or create a hazard for large vehicles attempting to access the site.
The applicant does not recall extensive discussions on the existing foliage by the BOCC
members other than those comments already issued by the transportation planner.A
packet of site pictures are attached to assist the BOCC and Planning Board members
in getting a realization of the existing vegetation.As indicated at the meeting on
August 27, access at the Right of Way will be regulated by NCDOT, however all site
inspections and reviews of the existing site conditions do not reveal major concerns for
Summit Design and Engineering, especially since the existing vegetation will have to
be removed if deemed a hazard prior to receiving a driveway permit from NCDOT.
Per discussion w/Mr. Tom Altieri, Ms. Darcy Zorio and Mr. Harvey at Orange County
offices on September 7, 2012,pictures of the field conditions were provided and the
entrance was reviewed in detail. Upon review, staff determined that the location of the
driveway was acceptable with respect to the adjacent drive and the existing vegetation.
14
Responses to Utility Service will be in Bold Orange Italics.
1. BOCC members requested written documentation from Orange County Health
and Building Inspection that a chemical or other toilet system could be used to
support the proposed office use.
The requested documentation is attached.
2. BOCC and Planning Board members expressed reservations over the applicants
desire not to develop a well on the property. Several comments were made over
the need for a well to provide water for staff, to clean the facility, and to address
emergencies.
The applicant is checking on the suitability and availability of a well location on the
site to meet this request.If this is not possible, then the applicant will be the one who
will have the cost and time burden of using a power washer etc to clean out the units.
Water supply at a Storage facility is not mandated by regulatory review agencies and if
this item is not feasible, the applicant doesn't feel that it should be an overriding
criteria related to the application for rezoning the property. If the units are left dirty as
members of the BOCC indicated is often the case, and the applicant cannot adequately
clean them up, then it is the applicant/owner that will suffer as no potential lessee will
rent a storage unit that is dirty. Therefore it is in the applicant's best interest to keep
the units clean whether it be by using an on-site well or by a portable pressure washing
operation.
Responses to Solid Waste will be in Bold Green Italics.
1. BOCC and Planning Board members indicated the applicant should provide a
dumpster area to allow for the orderly collection and disposal of solid waste
generated on the property.
The Plans have been revised to show a proposed dumpster location as requested.
2. BOCC members wanted written comments from Orange County Solid Waste on
the applicant's revised site plan with respect to the adequacy of any dumpster
located on-site.
Noted. At the time these responses were required to be submitted, the applicant was
awaiting comments from Orange County Solid Waste on the revised site plan, however
the location proposed is the most optimal and accessible on-site and has been discussed
w/Planning Staff with no negative feedback.
3. A Planning Board member wanted additional comment from the applicant on how
he intended to address the disposal of large items left on the property by former
tenants.
Per the applicant the customer contract clearly states that there be no unwanted
storage items left at the facility. If any are left, they will be taken to the landfill site in
Mt. Tirzah, Person County which is approx. 15 miles from the subject property.
15
Responses to Planning will be in Bold Purple Italics.
1. BOCC members expressed concern over the proposed clustering of foliage
along NC Highway 57 and Mile Branch Road rather than a continuous land use
buffer. It was recommended that a continuous vegetative buffer be provided
consistent with County standards.
It was noted at the meeting that there was one member that specifically indicated
concern over the clustered buffer and landscaping along Mile Branch Road and NC
Hwy 57.As stated in the response to the BOCC member, the clustering will allow
visibility of the proposed use, but will also provide a visual break up to reduce the
monotony of the storage building façade, especially along NC 57. It was noted at the
BOCC meeting that in general, the buffers proposed on Sheet C-6 were amenable to
most of the Commissioners and this is still the direction that the applicant would like to
move in considering the ability to propose/provide buffers fitting the use and intent in
this zoning district with the lack of specific standards.
2. There was a lack of consensus over the appropriateness of proposed land use
buffer widths along adjacent roadways and residentially zoned properties.
The applicant proposed the following:
• 20 Foot Type A buffer along NC 57 and Mile Branch Road,
• 10 foot buffer along the southern property line adjacent to the Wilson
property (PIN 0910-22-6989)
• No land use buffer along the portion of property abutting the existing
concrete plant.
• Staff indicated typical land use buffers for a self-storage facility in
comparable general use zoning districts were:
I. Type F buffer, 100 feet in width, along adjacent property lines abutting AR
zoned property, and
II. Type B buffer, 30 feet in width, abutting adjacent road rights-of-way.
Staff and Planning Board members asked for direction from the BOCC on this
issue.
Coming away from the BOCC meeting, the applicant felt that there was general
consensus that the buffers proposed were appropriate and that minor modifications or
requests may be made in relation to the buffers at the next meeting. However with the
ordinance for the REDA-CZ-1 zoning being lenient on the required buffers and
setbacks, the applicant feels that the buffers proposed will achieve the intent of the
benefits that a buffer would provide in this area, given the use and location.As stated
above, the applicant is open to direction from the BOCC if it is a general consensus
that the BOCC was not satisfied with the proposed buffers. The applicant would like to
state that it does not seem fitting that this use would provide a buffer equivalent to
those in the general use districts, otherwise why would the buffer requirements be so
flexible and not list this as the minimum requirements?
3. BOCC members asked staff to complete a field survey on an adjoining
residentially zoned property to verify if it was undeveloped at this time.
16
Awaiting Staff input, however all other sources indicated that it is currently un-
occupied and un-developed.
Responses to Stormwater will be in Bold Magenta Italics.
1. BOCC members wanted additional explanation from the applicant on the
proposed stormwater management system.
Details of the stormwater management, treatment and overall system concept were
discussed at the BOCC hearing.Additional questions and comments can be addressed
at the next meeting, however the current plans have been reviewed and received
concurrence from Mr. Terry Hackett with respect to the ability to meet current
stormwater standards.
2. BOCC and Planning Board members requested additional detail on the site plan
denoting drainage points on the property. This request was made after the
project engineer indicated the property would actually drain from multiple
locations due to existing and proposed topography.
Drainage arrows are shown and indicate typical flow patterns of the onsite stormwater.
Drainage points and additional flow arrows have been provided in addition to the
topography which reveals the actual drainage patterns.
3. BOCC members wanted additional written comments from Orange County
Erosion Control on the proposed stormwater system and the appropriateness of
runoff draining into existing ponds on the property, north of Mile Branch Road.
Mr. Terry Hackett has indicated that the proposed facilities would meet the County
standards which regulate both quantity and quality of water. The runoff will be
restricted per these regulations. The fact that the runoff enters an existing pond is not
integral to the proposed development and is an existing hydrological condition.
Responses to Quarterly Public Hearing General Comments will be in Bold Cyan Italics.
1. BOCC members requested additional comments from the applicant on the
intended means of restricting impervious surface area on the property.
The applicant did not recall this request, however, the plats associated with the
property will be restrictive related to the allowed increases or limits for impervious area
for each property. This property is subject to the same laws and regulations for
inspections and reviews as any other properties located in restrictive watersheds.
Perhaps the County Staff can provide the BOCC with SOP on ensuring land owners
comply with the allowable impervious surface.
2. A BOCC member indicated concern over placing so much impervious surface
area on the 4 acre portion of the property west of Mile Branch.
The intensity of the impervious area is not regulated as long as the treatment of such
areas meets the regulations. From a planning and engineering standpoint, it is better to
have it all located in one spot to maintain more existing natural areas and allow for
easier collection and treatment efforts.
3. There was consensus that the proposed use was acceptable.
17
Noted.
4. BOCC members asked for clarification from the application on the extent of retail
operations. The Board want to be sure all retail would be connected to the self-
storage operation.
Anticipated retail operations are related to materials needed for storage and operating
a storage business such as tape, boxes,padding, etc.
Responses to Additional Comments received via email from staff on 9/6/2012 will be in Bold
Orange Italics.
1. Driveway location along the eastern property line, adjacent to the concrete
property, is still a major concern for staff. There appears to be potential for
vehicular conflicts due to the presence of existing large trees in the area
impeding sight visibility. While it is difficult to ascertain the exact distance, the
driveways appears to be 25 feet apart.
Traffic attempting to turn left from the storage facility will be unable to see traffic
emerging and turning left from the concrete plant. Also the existing driveway and
turn radius are not conducive to allowing for 2 way traffic entering and exiting
from the site.
There will be a bottle neck with large vehicles attempting to enter and leave the
site at the same time. Staff would recommend the following:
a. Move the driveway approximately 220 feet north and locate it directly
across from the proposed driveway for the office/retail area north of Mile
Branch as noted on sheet(s) C-3 and C-4.
b. Widen the driveway to approximately 35 feet to allow for adequate
spacing for cars —2 way traffic entering and exiting the site.
c. Internal circulation will have to be modified in order to accommodate
proper stacking and turn radius for vehicles
As an alternative, you could do the following:
d. Have a dedicated, separate, entrance and exit points for the property.
The entrance could be adjacent to the concrete plant property (in fact if
this option is chosen this will be the mandated entrance only point). If this
option is selected the driveway radius will have to be widened to
accommodate large vehicles entering the site.
e. Dedicated exit would be directly across from the proposed driveway for
the office/retail area north of Mile Branch as noted on sheet(s) C-3 and C-
4.
f. Staff would recommend the placement of landscape islands in the drive
area under this scenario to further regulate traffic flow.
Either way staff is concerned the proposed means if ingress and egress will
not address turn internal turn radius issues or allow for proper staging of
18
vehicles attempting to enter and leave the site. Staff also does not believe
current drive location is adequate given site visibility issues.
Per discussion w/Mr. Tom Altieri, Ms. Darcy Zorio and Mr. Harvey at Orange County
offices on September 7, 2012, the revisions to the entrance width, drive isle width and
corner radii shown on the current plans are sufficient to address the comments above.
2. Turn radius around buildings need to be at a minimum of 35 to 40 feet (You show
35 feet at the intersection of Mile Branch and NC Hwy 57 which is good but it
appears tight throughout the rest of the site).
Per discussion w/Mr. Tom Altieri, Ms. Darcy Zorio and Mr. Harvey at Orange County
offices on September 7, 2012, the revisions to the corner radii shown on the current
plans are sufficient to address the comments above. It should be noted that it is not the
corner clearance that would dictate the allowable turning movement, but the inside
radii adjacent to the buildings. The revisions to these corner radii were not in efforts to
address this comment, but to save wasted gravel and associated impacts to the
impervious areas.
3. You will need to designate one-way traffic flow on the site plan to provide staff
with a notion on the intended internal traffic flow You will need to add signage
internally throughout the site directing traffic flow. Please note anticipated
locations for this signage.
Per discussion w/Mr. Tom Altieri, Ms. Darcy Zorio and Mr. Harvey at Orange County
offices on September 7, 2012, the revisions to the entrance width, drive isle width and
corner radii shown on the current plans are sufficient to address the comments above.
Two-way traffic is still proposed. Signage locations remain on the plans in the same
locations as previously shown.
4. We need and will require a 25 foot distance between buildings.
Per discussion w/Mr. Tom Altieri, Ms. Darcy Zorio and Mr. Harvey at Orange County
offices on September 7, 2012, the revisions to the entrance width, drive isle width and
corner radii shown on the current plans are sufficient to address the comments above.
A 24'interior drive isle between buildings has been discussed and proposed on the
revised plans.
5. Staff strongly recommends elimination of approximately 60 individual storage
units so that building sizes can be reduced to eliminate traffic flow problems.
Building locations and orientations will need to be modified to address internal
access concerns.
Per discussion w/Mr. Tom Altieri, Ms. Darcy Zorio and Mr. Harvey at Orange County
offices on September 7, 2012, the revisions to the entrance width, drive isle width and
corner radii shown on the current plans are sufficient to address the comments above.
Units have been adjusted as needed to allow access and site maneuverability as needed
to address all previous comments.
19
Other issues
6. Provide a note on the site plan denoting no storage units can be used for
habitation or used to store flammable materials on site.
See note#6 on Sheets C-2 through C-4 for details and restrictions on the use of the
units. This is language that has been provided by the applicant as part of the tenant
agreement that will be in place with all Lessees.
7. Provide a note on the site plan indicating storage units cannot be used as repair
garages or to support commercial operations inconsistent with the self-storage
facility.
See note#6 on Sheets C-2 through C-4 for details and restrictions on the use of the
units. This is language that has been provided by the applicant as part of the tenant
agreement that will be in place with all Lessees.
20
ATTACHMENT 1
21
plIIIIIIIr
;T4, ^ •
R. w
v ti *4rr t
� � } Fr� t� f•4 ( ♦w f ��2 '4 a3b�•
( rte^ . "'7 -. f.i-1 _ - �!�i' —
2012/08/02 05 : 35
South of Mile Branch Road Looking East towards Concrete Plant
&Proposed Drive Entrance to the site
y fR,, .
. ,
}
2012/08/02 05 .36
South of Mile Branch Road Looking East towards Concrete Plant
22
M r T Ay,f, w',4^ •
460
`'a .i�� �Sx ! � 4,.i_ a ■+5'//�. :�'"r. ;r '`+..4'.: '1:.<ir 1
•
._.
L-.•=0,---- ''......tftev.....
200112000002 00080
North of Mile Branch Road Looking South-East towards Concrete Plant
&Proposed Drive Entrance to the site by Existing Oak Trees
"Ili
zk t
_,,A,_ , ,,. 2012/08/02 0539
West of HWY 57 Looking East towards Site (*Note vertical curve/blind spot along Mile
Branch Road, on the left hand side of this photo, in regards to driveway location)
23
ATTACHMENT 2
24
p
1
4
:'4 �
'y 3_ 'N•d.f y f at"..0 1 � Y f l 1 /
.1 is Q'r ° Y»` `+tT
, s ".� �
a y S, ' F 'f
In., —.r
iI \' 1 �1 k,
V \x rI �(��, ,+ l, 6
II
II w `y� 1 Ili � f I�N+ II ,
i
f
i i1
III . I
it , I l
Existing Treeline along Southern Property Line
t
F.y
a v
'_
Existing Treeline along Southern Property Line
25
l s
p •'
t
4� .. rk 't �- iS z .: Y �`
n
+ e�! �i s ''tt z..
x-
,:r to�a�4.y 'iYA ._ - tt .1 Alicir
, ..,.. ,ti.,,,„ _...._, , ,,.
._. , ..›.
...... „„
•
'-.'
s.
e:F �• '�, -- _
0
1 - is0
Existig Treeline along Southern Propert Line
4,t;,..,,,,,i,
r ±fr jvk J 4 *
Itlits(
hiy," .y0 ---�F. 'L`. .10.; t .?4y,, "'�"`-co. T `wad;;
,*.... ...0;;;,,b f Mbp`N R t f `our S 4 * 1' ',,i.".4: 5 ;41'.Y„:,.� .� '_' .,
.. I) "',aye f„.0. ,N'yyj 'At y! 4 _ :4f , ,r r,. "?
� Y
°Y N
r
* 1r , 'x + 4 f bra' + r
-'. -, 1 -' t ,teas d .r ,tom 1•
ate. _ '•h,4,— ;' `,i1 y I * x ` r" ''it 'ca '�rfa � �',.
i J,
Id
Existing Treeline along Southern Property Line
26
ATTACHMENT 3
Orange County Health Department 27
Colleen Bridger,MPH,PhD Prevent • Promote • Protect
Health Director 17 fir' Partnering for the Public's Health
ri*IV
\Nip,
MEMORANDUM
To: Michael Harvey AICP, CFIM, CZO
Current Planning Supervisor
Orange County Planning
From: Alan Clapp REHS, LSS
Soil Scientist
Orange County Health Department
Date: August 17, 2012
RE: 0910-34-5040
Darrell Chandler rezoning request
Mile Branch Road and NC 57
A site plan review was recently completed on the proposed rezoning request. The following
items were noted.
1. Water Supply—No well is proposed
2. Sewage Disposal—No septic system is proposed. Incinerating toilet can be used if no
public restrooms are required per NC Plumbing Code. Building Inspections would be the
permitting agency for this type toilet.
No Environmental Health issues were identified on this site since well and septic systems will
not be required for permitting.
Please feel free to contact me directly by phone at (919)245-2360, or by my e-mail
aclapps co.orange.nc.us if you have any questions, or I may be of further service.
Environmental Health Services
131 W. Margaret Lane,Suite 100 • Hillsborough,NC 27278
Phone:(919)245-2360 I Fax (919)644-3006
www.orangecountync.govienvhlth
29
GENERAL NOTES: VICINITY MAP
100:120 SC.,
' '''11;;;;;°1"1'1.1;1'""'11;11".11°1"1"111,1110'A1-1=71=112110011g01,101-1r111111'191191,11
;112=19212101011=11100=r211112=19.112200.012912.2109.112,2229001,12,
/ 2/; 910102,911111.11.9529,-,',9; '-1;14.2-9,‘,..92.'0,21.°22219.42,2101,1'1199A2202„19, 1911/'91,',....,101940
21122200,111,22,20 0,20.20.2.10,191.9.2.1999.9...; ,,,,
; ''''';;;;"11"""11°1"1';;L;';EN111'"11L1';1;;;;;'119110011r1"1';'111121109£111'
220,002/1.11.1,29.1,22001,022,1202122.112,2,1,01,0 9 I .92021 , ,,
/ / / /
ALL010,20.1.012102,8,
112A141nefivjv '-';11/114,..:92991215,1:■''1141'&1;1124 '''.:02'1't111'.
/ ////
04112121:14194111: -.121,A;"4.,;:11 ., g
....
41,44.4.::::.4 044 4e-0 f ;w.,4'c't. 1, ,p,,,t,-.,
t
,—,(04'4,;'rus.'.
.4 ,1,: 12. .:),,,,:, ;; '',.',4,,, w-,,,-t.,..-t-z.:,,,'
LEGEND.
EnD r pRoposes
,N."9"''"'"44 41S•"-S40,,A ",•-G• ,'04,-''',IIAgg rr,•-•R ";;SI.R.,,,,,I
, / / •.. :".,. ,,,';',"A4F7''"
/.00,v0
°1.1111111111311/92111104.221&22299" ,
' -' , L,,,”„m,L rt,,,,,,,,:W.,,.,-,,„z, t*.:1.:;,,q,.44:':-1Z,,,%?:..,,,,,"eP V,'k,..i, '-,-.'::: 4'4,,
V 9E91.co...C.110,n,
/'''' / .11112''''1.-C,‘-91, 0,2290,1191-0; '.."1/ 4,...1;2.9,09,19.21.01'"0,,1
201,01,1100,92, " 40,1,91.99-22.10, 99'.•.4:Pre,,,,--"1,1,,,,,,,,,,10•"'" ^''''''''''''N-
-_
t =i'u"07.:Loc,
' / ' „,.. -^`;;;-,.. . N , \ :•;153 :: , ,)--4,. .,,,k -' ,,.1,4V...
A POS1102 2/122 V%V,.
, ,....vorirt4.id*.s.,,*,-,wv.....,..n,,' "t„,i„.v*,,-,... v;-,,,.. :•,,,:,,,.. :-.,n,
/ / _ ,,,,, ,f , /..,'..:," ,-,r;; '6-'.:.` 'i ' ',,'."".;,:':::`'-'0. 4: 4:--',Wr-,N , ,:Vi', Oli PON
,,, • .912/92,29.219,.291
; 9 "W"CL919'91 .. '1/ /'19;29 2 ' -;9;92.0921.9119/ /2/1921 ,
/9 /9/ ,,. „, 'V' . 1.19 ..02201.909,,,, i N. / ; ,,. V9,110.2r10.1 V 9Y1124. 204929;919129.991910, 2 209NIV:11,1.'92;1,20..2 9,Y11,1949'2,1,11 ,,99 0,5,Tor,t,t,p
/ / 1191 4 r -, - ''...:/`:"`•,''', '---. N g re$:.4*L‘;41,4:ji.,;;N:' ltiti:4,47:441:7 M .'iNiCh
rr • 0,0°N.7
• • 111,21.01110% / /V/ / i 1 11 -' 1. T1;;":1111.21/1 11 '' I f41'1,411:9,t40111:24.■0112/.;;)14291'1 2''''''''1'191'1 '41912.41114011. 9k0,0,T149-9 1; -5,!:.0''''''
/ _9_60992,09
1010.111/g1110; 2 / / ' , 2 99
"
, 2.9021.2,210.19
; / ' ..
V
'd
/ / ' 1 , 1'. -91 92';. 'v; , 0 V ; N
/ 2/ r'' '- '' ' 'A7.,''..;`,"` s,
...,
N '
7 / -
2
i
vHr 9922 v-119 / .11/ 2 119.2'; 0; / r ;
.529,11200 LINE
/ ' \ '1 v /2
li: 91911'
0 V
;
,
v09,,,,- 221,12,01,
; / ' /2 r 9'r '2' ' --
/ /N., „c. e
/ / / ' ', . C° 1 / g
CONSTRUCTION
S
/ 1
' • 7" / I ' ' .
g Is
i JO— 'IP' \ ' I I TE'FAiF SITE INFORMATION
..,,
..
, '._- / / ez :,',6,-,1 6' '
,/ r-----, -,1,x=, ',, , , ' , / / ,'4q, I , C'NE'17E1E70:772 T D
" ' / 212.2.0.2.,20
V 9
1200.10,952.
I
9,59,199210.20.9024, in ;11
10122
219 LUVR,ER
1' 42!
9 5,1 NORTH C1,0111,
,' ."',
299.01 ‘ ; 1 ;r9;;;99'9'2e1SE CI IA 11N 4
v 0,„„90 p00,20,0,00202,22
.p
4,2t / ;
/ ...• 3/ \--;.V_ 3„,„g,„3„,,,,*,,,„ , 3 , ',--3-1-- ,\ ‘, ' : ,, --„,3, '..,,„,,-„„,,
,t,,f3 /3, ' ‘, , , --'t RE-''''''.7' -1.2,32e1 „OP., ' ' I ; 0 111111=22111=1-0
,1
,' ,.„< ,_ „ - .-\ \\ ' , ,c/7=-5-
/ ,'`7.,, //, ,E,,,,77ic, 4:1'6\ , '-'c ,, , ‘. , ------ ' ', ' ?: i N '— i ig.3,,'
,.
P-,/ ' ' \ '-. \ ' ,3H ' 3' 33 \ , i - f .,,,,,
FE4E E. w w 6 z
',';, .' - ', \ ‘\ \ ,'-, \ `, • ' ' , ', N , , ;
CD F.z a
/ // q'1/' ./ - --'‘ \ \ ''s "- '\, \' ''\ , , , •,'-‘ ' , 1- -, f ===,,,,, rg:N1.2g c7) F'_
/ ,L4,,\
4
=`',
- I i
09110229,19,2 06,21 10.729/
aultoves 235221120., 114 C.)Z -
\ \\ ‘' \i ,_:_,L'i L.. _
= z
.,, , , ,,, e 7— •1---
-tC 0:i. 0
/,, -1_ _ -- - A,S\, - 7 ,_-5 \ -,4-:---,,--,--__. _ -,, !
1 .
.,\, -----\ ,, 0.200 RAY K.,2 . , 0,, 1 0
-,, ,-..;fo'1.-, \ ,,— N . \ s \\
/
,
,- , , , „.:. , =',,L. 0970121r110'120111/20,1 00920% 'V \2 ;1°, v. ' 792f112:: 11° \ v;'' , Ili 1
9 21,012 r.90-911°Z„\ 1 9 I 0 ,11-1 ,
/1 / / r , , 11111; 11711' 1 VON,. ;111'1' 2
v„,,09.„
,I 0
0 / .
vr=nramsz. -
12-0191
811. .,..,,,,.,,.....,,.,
DRAM.WAD
120191 EX 1
kl GRAPHIC SCALE
el, 15 0 25 50 100 200
Know where below. j (1109,.. C-1
Call before you dig.
29
,g
„".7seTryrsM=.7r,S17VinSOMF”—\
c_.H,Prycl1,1%/ROUGHTSTE,rry,NCE CP, 1 0,,ssa,,,,,Ta.1,E=.10x,rgsg=„%% \
,FI,A,D177,170017%,7%,SUNFACE PO,
I . -
; 7.NOLSE.SESIDEN%,„7
illt 1 1) I •• •-• PI Si .-- DE7%
.'
; ' 0 1=1=11W"'''''' / ! 2.3 RIJNNERS- INI
,.
/ I MEM
: 1 ,
LAN,UTSSMXT,ANT „Sf '„ 8
1 I
I GATE RETAINER / I
, es°ON.%cao 30,,S1 DUMPSTER PLAN
TYPICAL DOUBLE%I'M ROLLOUT CA%
DAS%R..7 Hcsary \
1,,i,i.I
I %,17,1,,,7[1,1%fory ,..,,,,,Zaisa.. ,\'',,,•-`''''' 1"'...,1,,,1,,,,,,T"' \
EXHIBIT
,
'',7 / /// ..
„i.,' 1 SCASE 1,2.
7 ,
:1 , ,:,.gma-T•0„, ::,1 , • , , - ,
SITE INFORMATION • „„„_
. ,
- • \ \GATE RETAINERS '----, WOODEN DUMPSTER / <41::"RX • „'-
/,/
\ \
iiii.i \. "Lzon,,,Aug,tsz:Qr,044 ENCLOSURE DETAIL /.3\33/ / /;;;'
, •;44/ / V/ RV RiEg4M”
• ;,„„., ;;,'LLE,,;:i',",-,7,,
r•,'1,1=',1',
/ /,4::::.•:.:::6, ,
/4.1g,•:v .1
,":•",,,,,o,:,
,.....,..,,,,,,,,, .9'6
Nm, . /.. \ \
'''''''"'"
,o„„,:„,.....<, b
1. .=.0-1-%%BrE=8;g,GROSINC,r11,11.4,001,1017.1%.,,UNI,ALL SIDES USE 7"S071%, ' 7 /,,,,,,,,,,W 1
(7- STATE,170.1.CAROL%
ta./
'/' ,
3 CONCRETry...0 TO EXTESS%13,701,0 EDGE 0,,,,C70507%.% , , 77
3 1„,,..6irMTOMIn.77%,TOP OF POS7 TOPP%0170,0 Rrylus%70 BE.Fa.c.170,
'Y ,, //
r(- , ■ ----
REFERENCE, EV
% \
WOODEN DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE R''''R=v--" \ /3I310,3 ,3/ ,sz..0i,S:,,,,S1 .4C)Spor....%nisonriscss e,...N.In„711%.4,1
AND GATE DETAIL • \ ,\R'43:3,3;3;'`, ; //
sysp.sEirEff
/ \s'''''4,6;6"."Vf '',. ;\ / ' ' 8 r:'crolru.se7s=c..
1-4
GENERAL NOTES: glint'
, '' "'
Y Ail-„k,,' 7 v ,, ,
1 .01.1ry,,,,,01,17.-S0111,,,Is SSONISE.,..7 ics.71 oss 0,1%%ED 11/19%9 ALL 0-178,,XIsTir.ry%%I%AND ' isiS4,,, „ry,------7, b,SIGH SPEED SC7,711 7,
-0,...,APHIC rrysoRsuynot,SA%%NI 0,710,COUNTS%%As%ASR,S PM1S,700SAPI-SS.:77,1 FIELD...CA.0.S SS, / / rycryst ' \ \
FRONISSISACA, 7, 4.miry. ''-," f
, „,,,,,;------- —10,70.31%,,,,LE
IT,.EACH SID, s t SID,SCroAry, ,SI 161,171 ,:;.'
2 THE PROSERTS,S.,%,,,%,.,111%,RESIDES:1,,AN,IS LOC„, S.RI _ c
ei SE,S.71,Cry 37 NSA
.3 gr=f2T171rjr,g,==S111)=ErISI''''',F0''..NZT:SPF'REST'EREF,IFE1 / e, ,,,,-- A \ ,-. S.,,ASSON,S7LOWED I.,,,,I,US, 1.S.SSS SS 11,-. NOT OR
i EXISTING IMPERVIO,SASE, „S./5, ,1737ry,
4 ',ER SECTION dr,1 sc,KING%%SR%LOVE IS SEW% i ,ryorOSED ImpER,701,..1% 76.S.SSSE ,asoM
„S. ...,,,,,C7 VEHICI,CCESS 0EsEr7711.7 7,0ry owl%ry,%ATE si asssolry,Ery vii,,,,ACCESS ry...18,Es1,, SSRSONNEL
/ / 4,17 ry,,,,' --/1.,\ Vc
_______\ TOTS,V,P,SVIOUSAREA. 5.7187 SE 16 72, 4.4-Ai
sSIL,B,,,,0017:f oR ACCESS,2,%ATE IS 1,01,401,%0 SNISRGE,SC7 PERSONNEL„VILL,,,,,,es r„,FOR ACCES, / „Kfy ,,,,,, 'kLi, V, A REMA1NING,LSONEE,CAPERVIOUS, .3,,,SS 7 78,
6 IN ACCORDANCE%I THE TM%AGSVC%71,0,0SE0%HE CMJER THESTORACS SAC%S7,%OBJECTS°77E ,
F'grgT7'.,, (
„ \ i ,,,,,,0„,%,10,,,,,S,sioll,REP CS77,LATIONS.
/ %
TFORDPS.1 E 1,011%,NISSORAGE%Vs 1......1%.E0,1.0./S. / .,„,, / //,‘, %SEPARATE% \%,,, %
7„
TRovirsisssrpry,710,,,,REAT,111,ACILI,0,1,711,Foolir,,%,,C1,7121,%%0,LOSVISIG o CONTRAI%D.
/ / , , ',„„
WEA,ONS EXPLOS%W.V..,sunimAssE%MICAS,1L7EGAL OR LEGAL DrysiGS%.%1071 Tom,OR HAZARDOUS -2) \
...7..TERIALS CR WASTE.PETROLEUM PSCOUC,ns At,rill,OIL GAS TIRES ETC%IMES 1,777,,,,,,,WIT-1,FOUSSmE% / cS.4" / /' ''''" 'S, , --\
'
SIRNAGEmErli,1,71,11,,,SIOL,pEss,s1,1%...SoLINS OR MESE!Rlei CON1,1%O.AuS7.NG 77%0%HOLD COmBUSTIBLE , 7,..% , „/;,---„,/ , % \ (7---- . —7,-;.ngr-r0%
LI%PROPANE,OXYGEN 0,',Cuss,.TANKS cry's TAISKS117,0077.1%,0%007%,1,10,%71.kk CHtsli%Or \ t PARS%REOUry,o,,SPACE PER EMPIOVEE,13 SECTION 6, CONSTRUCTION
Arcs 1%GAS pOsSER,E,EQUIPMENT Cry%I essry RI,sus%op r..,.D Ss II,EGAL ONDERS1.7,0%ossesc,v,°RCA.. ' / ,q''' / 4,,,,,,,"„al, *\ ' X ' '''', c„ REDNEr,TO%%17
s,, sk ,ARSISSO,ROV,Dsolls,A0E
,
D.,,,,,,,,,,,GE or,'0,..0%,7,7 cry,..1,710EvER,.0.1,1,7ALS%Ill%Srlc,12%,IN 1-1-1,RENTA1711.17
UTVH=F4='1V74STS=ItIg=PXISSSUASSOL'gf'STB'ETElfs.71,71,1==1;',714=''' ,,, / 0 / /7„S,A. „'924,„'' ,
. ''', 710,RS OF 0,ERAIION:%AM-S.00,u,,cAys a.ssEEK,
SA,RDA,%NG,,,,,,,,SON,8%77
171.1%,,,,,,,ED,Es TH,Try,S.10%.,%,71,1%01 et■1%AS A.SRE EC!,HOBSISS GAsAG,SALES CNOOING 7%, / 9,)‘,',/,‘S' X/ \
, A/6, A6, , ,,,,,A, '4':,1„rvcp..„,, \ -',19 \,_—,--------- ,,-•
%MISS sc,,,Es,,771101.%%,,,,,ION 0,1 ALL THE',BOVE%,5/No%%12%7,1,CCOR,INGsry ' -.2\ AW;
,223/4-g v,-..0::,,,:-twx,,,r:,,,,,.,,,A, , A,,, \ :.
, , ,
,------ ., ,
STANDARDS OF EVALUATION: / •• -•'/, 'Nfi 4,;', ".',,'0V/:/'kg, ,...? , \ ._
PER sECTIoN 333 Of-HE ORANGE CO.,oxiriEDD,ELOpuENT 012171,11,1.00,1[TOLLOwa.,,,I. ,
THE STAND.%OF DECELOVSnessrFsca 77s sEas-c,,O,STRICI. 7
---------'1'"==10'"
1 APPSICASIONS„Os%%CA I DISTRICT%LS BE ACCS%ONLY FOR SAS%DEUNEATSD SS SENO
SUITnes,FOS 7,01-R,SIDENI-477LEVELOPNIENTryst%II 7,C111,311%:,,,Emv,,,,,,s%ARE„,,ss . ,,i, ,, ,,,,,r,7.,.:.,i,„.„,. .:,,,„,,,,,,,,,,,, =A, \
c
S %
..,,OSI,B7 THE%COSI AUG%2:07 1// W., / 'fir /4e0g02,,:Alt14 --v lk'4 \
7 pOIENTAL sis,,,,,RESTRICTED TO THOS,LSSTED,%I%SOSTH,RE%/1 DISTRICT IN SE.,SION
cc%)
47' i
(„7/17' SUB ryl,ris sirs,
\ \c__-------
3 spEs,,,,,,,,,,EL sE%FS,TO THOSE APPROVE%ft!,%RD 05.7%,INISSIONERS. ,
ryes4. .
r
C,-- LEGEND
DA'S'',s'io=1-YSIg°,7,Six's,',"=',/fif,,,,,/',RT'ErE'ECIERE'T a'SI C,'OtilS'SVOAMITL:SFRTERTIcrl'Nor'''' '1''''''%„ / 1 7 S,' y ,/,,,*J ::,A0,-.,v.Av.::,,,:2410\51 \,.. ,..A,,,,-, \ ,x%,„,
9 ALLOw.01,10.1,,,,,,SURFACE AI,IS BASED ON THE%ER.,,017C.01,07,%,171%111
,ry,711-1-1,,R0,Elisv Is soc/TEr,REHR TO SECT%0,SOR As,,,,D0.7,0%,.1.1.0WABL, ,4, / 1%-c#V„" 44?.0,4.„.t*."''% '''',YX7,,KV'S:4i. ---- '''
-0.,...,. .4,,,,,,-
5 o'sr,',,olu'r',',FIATryCiVlis'E'CONDIT.01.1.,ZONING Dn.,-S.,,nEx,ez-rc%S7=ii%,,
\ .
Ssn'Eg=1F.S=V,roLse■ESF;g1I'ASZISIZS"""A"' ' / ,-,S4-'1>_7'/Y4n,.'.4it):.\.„.,:wg,„,,,,,o,
' ','":1ZroVS17rAPP2',ZETT=F71,7=rs',===77111=E-ZrZSZgrZT,R / g S''' 7) /,„/ .,4*-'' d..i..'...
■
5 PtArICIVAII7,0 ge,,,,,,,,D WHAT 4770,1,1 Of GROUNDWATER WIII,SAWAL,S,FRry7 sus,11,8, o ''/7' , ory„,..„,,,Ary:,,.%,, %,„,7s,
, a,',==,',;x7x,,rnn,==is,=070-r.r,Lrzr==,„ ,,,,f_f„-' 4,Div,'•:..nwr s,, ,,,,0-'-ht:,,: , F14,,W,'
,., MECHANICALJOINI;SEND 0 1 E3
',, ,A,,,,,,,,A.,,,r,.8,„,,K,...,8,,,,,,,,;,' ,„„,;..,,,,.,-• ,,,,,, „,;kw-,,,,,,,,,,,,ns" :01., \1:',8\ A fO,INDICA/%71,1,1,
fl, sols Rs1,,,,v,vE 17.,
..r..,,0.3,'
CY \, \ (1, • SPNRARYS.,,,,,,I,NOL, W TsJ
C? C) z
,t,'214,4,',147,r.r...q,,:; .., 8,, \ 1 818 • cor,,,,,
,...>:.
„:17EREEFFj:i■- '- ' '^.-4'8,4418,8:8`,88.8CP*.s.".,,,i0:<-,-,,e8,.;-'_,-,,.88,84,,, ,,A8A-8,W .
8 DI • DROP!NSF CP Z"
„„,,,,,,,,,, / 0AS,0ry-NS%"%ff-MS.MX%, 7, \ C.
.0, \ 77 ,I1, frywa,o%%ON OS, g 44'
/ ' --'(''''',/ ''',S'fr'll'Sr-41.41377.7,'''ItfraiSSistigi1070R,...ftry'S'71.0..,V7is'SMSSSA,%://SiSS:SV:774,/%'',,,S. ,, \ Al„.\ \
1 EeSiFsCISI \ \
.4.:.. .....\'.\ 4.
/ 'S'''''',/,'SS7'74j's''.7.,"7,7'0'''.0''S', 7,,,,,777.7,,',7,!.7%,7,7%,.7s,,,..S:',,,,,,,47 ,,,7',.'Pa''ryS,",.'",' ':',*,`,;`-
\
, PROPOSEE%S.IN P2 . 1
/
/ / ,/ / 101ggOgEL;3e4WIL:\ ..
■ ',:;., -
/
=a .:W-.A';4'h.M'. 42,324v4, 222%;.: :,./■.:. .:.2,,r,22,. --- ,2'r'''''. .....7. ss......... ESISTry10,0%, 0 a.{7 —.
i
- LC, ...1'S.F D''..."''. 6T-,■-7,Z °-
/ / , / ,\,-. -- ---- I :;,,-,,',,,.tQlr,,,,;;;M:',7,:-.:;::.'10-- .,•,:,,,N1,04%,".".V.-',:' - -,' ---..,--t, '--
A
" / /...s■'■.•••■■4, ',.' ss's 7 77.7 T 7„._=.,_7_7,=7,_,,,j J.....,_7.._.,.._,,_..., ,_,,-,--,-,;%,,-,---'\._41\ ,, .84,
811,,, / ,
/ , P L''..'''TH''''''''''S''''''''' I -7,7-Tzamfg,- .0„ --- —,:w— —
%%COM% \ AR% , ...----"' o,,=,
12-0191
, ;" FR,,,,L117%71/17,1711,E% I
''T ' 1,73%, \ j N,—,...‹,..,7,
DB E 7,.''''.'59713%'P'5.5 a PO 1201919-1
i,l‘,-:-
/ /GRAM.SCALE
e15%V.% GATE KEVP.4:1- ,--Esa,0.1(TR,Es
\ \''IN 27 26 ACRES
SOUSHEI,MPS%CO
2, 0 25
sAulcusE:R.Fsrne%
Know what's below. ---„,--.-=,---,,.„.--. .,,,Z)%:lli'=,,", ---\\:-,-=, i . , ,,,T117%.„..0017
Call before you dig. (IN FEET1 LAND Urgilgtnla.AL I
C-2
I 7%
/ '2 22r/2i`4g2 2./ 7-
GENERAL NOTES: 7 I
\ -......, /
•Ivir 57 f100,,,
3.0
2ig.2
7 I,CgON 4..5 Of Ter 01,,,L LOWING ORONRUgg THE PROlgligg g ligirge. A lOgg IgngggViOgg SUP,CgARkeeLLOIMEigi OF 1 gg Ole 7 / ,g
.'
5 gAggG51,I gg gigg.f.ACCESS pfgErJggIG igrON Ogaggg,1111f GATE IS p..101;?ftragfe.0 gCCES EMERGIN, PFRSOMNEL WHIM"Vet,
/
//1',,9' • , , \
, '-',,..-n';',,,A.:.'',n4":g.,;s,r„,r,=,.,1,7TT-,',=,. ',T,..=-.',,,;,.?,-,•EF.g,f4:,,c„11.,„,,,r,EF,,,,,,,,,,,,„
,...."
gef ORM..NOLIGEMONT STOgg GE Calle,121.1,3 ARE.FOLLOWS I ''):7 /
7 g 67 ACRE
.rg_nr..E.,,MA)NOT grOgg ArTHIS fACIle,OP.1-1113 FACIL.glgNJERANY gIRCUMSTANCE511-1,0,0,10:4XgRAggigg NEAgOgg , g 7 LAM:urfr..ng giggrf gIT g g- gg, ,
g-=1ZgrOAS'C7fAre'l\g4'1,1\j'OrG..ti;Ef- ',.=';‘i z,T,z;tmv,7,==.,,A=Tz,,Ell
/ g .'7 \ ; ,,,, g gg--•::::::::7 1
Pkg.gm gksoggig OR DIESEL it g.CON Aw...s na ANYTHING,Kr WOOD 1101,00..&E UGJID gg0g.eNg OXYG,OR RCEMENE -k ',
-,11,4,14,141,5 geg-CONTAIN EXPLPSIVECON,Ng gOAGRICATURECNggICAL,OF erg KIND GAS 1-,Ogggegg ggl rgm,41.ore Are!Ur, ( 7
rier7=1°1770Crtn'L'S'.6\.=TOTHZ\'6.'KEPI-rIgi'=171==i,?!N:ML\g11711?:='S'C=rgl.SALB , g /17 DARRELL gs,1g.Fig\18
DB..,ZgraiTg.5 gg>„k eg g90g-gg' Sggegggg 7
F.A..0'1-1\j=lgZgr'O'n1S,P11,7Z=I'rOR'LlZ4"'Z'grre'Cl%Ug,';I:LIZk\g'19-1A-r7.1,\31=t1=ZTNIS-'1.1%IlWrYg%T=T\''' 7 \L\ ggg.g.,
,0,.,,Q2,2e2,22E,ONGOING LgOgg e.g.PRACTICES POKIIES SOC AL OggiEggg STAGING AREA ggg,gggVegg Erg TEN.ggir g g LAND Ogg gnnFigg g I g/g,„ 1
ACKNOWIEDGESTHATTHEIgg g,CIA,IggiglrOg R,SIDENIIAL INCL.,ggle-Vggagg Ol MIRCIKIgggg ggggrEr:TOO,gig 6USNESS CR
eggnoggin,FWERPRIS,AnNAGEmE1,10.5 FULL DISCRETION ON nit-Mg ABOVE ISSUES Avg WILL EggORCE,grAgCCORDINGLV \ 7/ \ , l /
/''''6'''r(''''''''' „/"..,' EXHIBIT A
„C' \ SCALE:1,250
STANDARDS OF EVALUATION: 7
.2 .
ZR.,S,75:,0,,,T,7.Orf,1g013.51,GE COON,111.1,DDF,LOPMENr ORDINANC,JOI THF FOROWING FIrlia[1,,STAIIDARDS,DEVELOP'.NI'
SITE INFORMATION
1 .„2-0-02,222„..222r2.224.2„2222.2.22242-2444,122„2,2J,.-2,220„E224-4 ,, \ 44444 .2\4 ,42-
DEvEgOgtegryg g g1-114-1-1E NC H,I MAY g7 SPFagg AV AR,.SMALL AP,TIAN ADCPTFD BY gge BOCC ON AUGUST gl glOg g-7'gggkr..* // ''''E 2 EAP .',gro2q.2.
9 PaggrIggl USES SHALL BE IgESTRICIgg 10,03,1,0 AS PERX11,0 FOR NE RED,CZ I DKR,IN geggION g g g ,g- \ \ '
w,.,,.,,,,,,
E,2'K, ,,7ggggggg-
gESTRICTION5
A Alt014,1.,IPERVIOUS SURFACE art,g 3P.5E.,ON 11-E OggERSHED Xg0,,fgggi 0 ighl,MTN.11,1 WiggiggggHOPER-1,10CPIED Rega '=.7,'.' / ,\\ ,,,.,7,1 -'-'
Y z.,,,-A/,c'\/
rg ga.1101,2 6.f OR n BREAK,00.,0,4 m,vpplelgIPEPVIOUSgUR,CEAR,
5 ogvEgoggAgN,ITHIN Ng COnignION,mum,DISTR,ISHALL BE SUB-11,10 egg,PLICABLE USES-W..0g ragr.Fr.Irg.4EgCLES 3 ge..50, LANC(.41\0°K.Z[RACK 7/ 7 7 C011trl OgANG, 8,1 rg',E'01,qi.
gry.5 0,7111,,CE OP PRO,.CREedgg AgEgggrrgEgPier MEET THE WENT MO SP.Of 71-E RE-GUUMN, 7 / -4-'7" "/k-\''\-g-- EIGS'53Mi.FI,' gg g \ \ ,Sgr.=j'ig.71gTgr,PRO-rECTEDI g gg,'.i.1Eg
' 'P'FFe'D\Ig=S=E°:rg'itCy=ltf'l 11'g\;=■.‘';gr:D..\S'N4'C\;;Z\701rt\70= 1-17-rZrg'11=g1=rr' 7, EtUan5M
,11-1DRAWAL IS SggE n.51A7g.NABLE IN ME ggNIED,rg VICANI V Or rig L17,AND rg OTHER WELL,WILL BE Agg ECTED B)SUCH Wrgiggegg, /
,......., , „ ,
7 All Ne,g1 DEVELOggEng SHALL JAI GROUNDWATER INTIHDRAWALS TO NOI ggige THAN gg.uptiggi,M gill,PER ACRE / ,g/ggggekV kg g\, g--------\PaCE,\g'gr\STI,'"' g, _geggnigg 17,,g,PG,6P,LPG 70
E NO NEW utvggOggIENT 45,,PgIGNIfignigiNEGgrg,ggrAC-g,x,ag ROADWAY,7,A,FC Pnrrg,1.3 OR StirgAgg gaggle,,E gio-rggNS g
Sgeg Be g EgNrrigg...SAN gPF.ROPRIATE MO VIAPIE.301,10g HAS gEggge,k0vgg.I.,7 MiligggErgig,COND,TIONS I g 4 gg'\/--k k-g '/Y gg-k----. 7,g g
-----------\\ ,
',. gm..g Fr AREA g15.3115.9 Sg.75.89 4C1 II
LEGEND: / .. 2 =n1
/ /ZI'- ,,,,' / 1%\ \.1.;, \ , _
_,---- % EXETING gge FN.,.giggigg
PROPOSED gge SE,gOaggE
i 1
7-' /%/1=1-1*, '4‘:. c \ t I%=E=g.i:d.=1A1'47 Ag,g„IDEI,AL„CPER,,23 eg AC„, 2 3 ,ggg
-__
/ gga 7 1,'''''''\EAt i'\ g gg \--------
g 0 VggrEIE roFER Z g , g
/ /,_4tlfr„, ,_ Rs- , , ,,,,,,,,„,-\\ ...,,, „o-
,,
,,,-------'- \ \
- ( XV-MO',',Ce, s I =igtt. ' Tg 'Irk'
/--gg' / A.=,..R '„7 ■ ,' \, ) ':,-T NO.T-:::, FOR'
A Reg(,FoICATOR VT,E./21VI
/ /
/ eg e /,,,,,,,,,g, egg , g 7'4Y\
EgSggig,IggleggalS Agge ggr,75f I,ggg4
PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS Aggg g4g. Igg I , p 1Iggg
, g CURREN1 TOTAL gIC0,1.P.agg 156 ggn gg /10..1
gg • seri!PRY SENER mg.I.101, \A gge/'' 7, 'egg',V g',..g%\?iMgg'4. g,'-'\., , g. ,. REM,NINGALLOWE0 ggegggIOVS. aoal 8 sf 1177,
l V
-'—_-'„'—k,-1g•_'7I-kC,I,:-g,,,3--'-I g--\:--',\,.3\.1 g„.0-\e',--0't__'--'„t4'-7.V g c.,_'•.0,,.„...„'',_'—.'','g',,.ETgi'XP„„Ege"I'.D,FegEgR.xLxngR.lPngg1I/.E-E\.eggOg O-NoOi.,s.',\RE,7g1C-,"rPiP'8 gS„vgggEg.,00O-.1org,R,iOgN.,1,,G0's,„SOg,-,Ef'g E-L gg"1-T,oSg i,gG\EAp10 D 7 DgN
eIC,E
gGgS0gS 7.gR"„,NgIi,T'.gg-ggI'%-Rg-O\gS gg„g\
4REr„.e.BN rB\E'M-rurgA g"gg,„„F g gerlNggE
:aogI lgA-N,
Cii,gg 1.0 igE ggN g E gl 1gc.
, /7O:c,, *,,*.'r 22,.',,7,.!•264'„2:,,,..,\fk,:.4,'4,,\,:,\t'''W 2,”,-,k',O,g1 r%g,.;g";,':."-,,:-.;F,.,0,,',2,.'.2%:i:‘2,„.;,V-g,:i,2,:0 g,;..,2.!i'-,;.,„'J:k-'.2,,,7,A'',::2!'g'.':v:,,.,„,'7'!',-,2,,'':„,,14,gg,g,=,'g',,e,i,,,„I.:,',",4,-,2,;1''\'.1,,,„7g,-,',,.4.,f,*.H,2,'.,:,-742.':i'',T,.\44e-'-,e4.,.;r,,-g„7,i:,,,z':,.zqg;n3,,\2,.,`4,-,,"N,:.,,g-.-5 2:,44,2 g'e'J,,:6,.';!.-,.•=„';L-\.I,\:7,,tA,,-ma,,,\-,s.,'1„:i,",,':,.-,\:1„gi,,L„--v\','';i',,:,?4,s;„,_;'A-','''-.,1,,O-',,.,7-y)k,,;.,A%,''\,,\,',\A 7,5t_A._,,■__,sg_'e,A7im.\,c_",,_;:_(,,\,,E_,„_,„),,,,1/4,_,\_,__,\,-\.o_,.,1,.,,■\--\-',„q-,,\g—''
e',',,'',„''''0''„'p,0■rg';r.,,
.eg
e...ir'lg:O g,g,aFeg,g l(,0gSgg,.O T,HB,IE S<S,SA,f,EODD,E,f OT,DP,r0g R,Io7,V1gE1,g,N3i0g,,gr i,g gO i,,(gFg,FI,CP LE D,,,AE,,-NAkD Lg-S gg ggeegig,-lgg5,i g,
P„,,LAig.-1n,R,a0,DIR„1/4 O.,-m,,ADrg,,e.g,P,l.IiT q,g I.,O.I,g gO,.,g iN D\gg F,R,,,og,.Ofg,\Ov g,gO,\g U,g,1i OF.l Ii'R.ggIE C,g5 D
iPUOA.P R DI N,I,gS,R i S g P IP
\Ve SA A,CAE p
1CC1/4 Cg3A5g..E Q
Eg1,5111
.D\0007,g.
3,.0 a1A1,„\9,gS5S5 F I,,g F,C,\OOD\1,1l,f,1 N.',,0 8,2 70..2S,7I,1.11 M,.1,,,%,7•1
.12A..kgg.Ca g E 5g,g..%"e./gEgioE0Cr.1].
.,8',1 C.:2-2 30 NIONIGHI
:CO0n:Y'NS TI.!i 1 I 1 i R
U14”''2 i_,.',—,",
C 1 Tg:
O(,7f','i,,tr.N/ ?44
/ < / / 1/4 \
. , e '\
/ * \ 2
,k
/ ,,,,-.4'7,9,Z'', rf,tY
,,.„,„ 1,,,,\ \
,..„,” .f.V.,-- -,5Qig ,A.,;,,s,A4.4I-rj,-.- -MA-1.,‘"-,.: -;-,.? \ (-
r
' ;,•,,,,F.,,,, ,,, 4, Alt g„..,-,4,vorgi,-,-,ip...;:-:,,,,,,ik'', , -.._
\
,' // // /7 1' --ge'4',-'if0,, ,40` ,, :§ifgf,‘0, FV&,',,,,,,,,45.e.:-:'' , ,„ ,,-=„g.:\ ',-- p'=,;g=',,,
‘, `, \ P-,F
/ / / \ ,-`,..,,,),,; ,,,, ,:'„,..e.o.rwe„,,9-,x,-,- 4,,, ,.,-,-,F,-:,,t;t,„$:i':,,--6,4,,,,,,,,,,L,!g,-:-ir.,..,,,.-'ow.-',:,..e.,-,5,,i-,;-:,,\, ‘,„ \.;„, '''\ARA'\\'gg, ..--- .-,--,'''l''''''-''''''''' --
kg, g'1.--gkg ,5:,;!?r,,,,?',V0 ,,,,'e ..:,',.r,',,,,,,,,;,-;,,,,,,,,,m,,,■ ,,,,,w,,,„,,,„,,,,- ,,,_,,,,,,,X;,,,, ,
,,,,,,, ..c,,,:,,,,, ,,,,,,,,4.- 0,. .,,,,,,, ,, o--pf,t,4,,,,,,,,,,-;,,, ,,,,,,,.,s_t;,,, ,,,, ,,,,,,T Y'r, ” ',------"------
' )‘ ,, .1
T.,t,
,
,
W4 47 3
CD z
..x„giggiiglANGLE
' A.,,,, ‘.:1',,,,,„,,,,..:',.,'x,',S'.4b'r,,-er,<',''t' .,.'V..,'ZA:Z=.. 'rWl".'<-S,,,,':iM,','''''t,'''t''''''''''"'_;ll''-•''',''”''''„,,,,,,,,4,, \ ,,,_ ,,,,,,-„,,,,,,,,,. , i -
P2 9 f
icONCRETE 77_.'e-,
BLDG COPNER PP, APRON
!egg UZS?"ZiiIM-IURAL IgND dr
811, t..la g.
'5'''-g7\ g gOJECT NO
12-0191
25 GRAPHIC 252212E
2
12.019121
Know what's below. (1,ffi9 r,
Call before you dig.
''''',-, ■ ,
31
/ 1
,' \ b ' /
GENERAL NOTES:
/ \■ /,6`,/// ,' / A \ .-- ...57,00.g.
I „..„„lbrirOPItIONTS„.gt.t„,..gOISCAL_Egt DA„D11/19.0....„„EXISTI„trbt 1.......0.tg.1.0....1 1. ? 77? ' = '-L
TAKEN........r....C...GIP DATA At gb-PIPL.P.P.I.P.gCTUALFIE.LOGAIGNStig F.P.IONS gr...PROMPNOSE SHOWN mtg. T
i 'Prb=1r
PROP.:S[0 LOCATI.P.5 AND Elf.TIONS.g NEM>.PP FILLO.J.STED.ACCO,....C.E.Fbritg..,t1HAtt..., ''
/gb/Plgrtt / / tg'OP'n1.VIRL-= n k-- /,' r JP,011 Pt,PPPPFG132
2 1-111PPPOPERtS Star.......112ALREIDENtLI Ago Lb.C.Eg P.11141gENEOPEREVgg Pg.bgre Ht..'g LOCATE.I.HINTNEFtRIVER , 72.2.„2„, \ --- ,,
PROlf.,......DISTRICT.tTAILEG WI.INSPC-POrt 2 OF TF.N.EC Dege....1 QgDINANCE /itt
?„.?....rt
P PER SECT...I 2 b 0,1'1.........ORDINANCE 11..OKR-Prt 1.11EIT TO ATOTAI IMPERVIDIPS.P.,Et....0.1ENTOF It.031,57.8,
/ /
urbouggrAGartgruagb . T, g.
, 7/ /
g gATgrgT,TFT,Inttgoir==ugurr tb..,-.IPC.FISIrtglbgt,ir PADACC,PS gter.ENCY pg.t.gbwrigget,ENCODEFOR
/,
tfOROPIPIEROUGEIPCNISTORgGPCENTIPPLESARE.FOrbt. //fgt.!?
.1.1.egSgErrtglICITSTOREtINISPACILT,OR US.I.gt11....,,,..r.C........ESTI.FOLLOWING gCON-iRtAlt Veg.°.ant,
/
bribetRKS Ht...DIEWCALS ELM.nr.I.N DIPPC,P.P.I.M.1 IOXIC CP Krt...MATER.I.S OP WAPPT,PETROLP....tbr.S,g. ?/..r.b.;t ,,‘ 7 Pg ACRES prg kg- .
lq.Ort.,11PES ETC gArr,,,P01.TargST.N....gbtebb.....g.treNi[Mgt.,gbOrt PROPFRIPI C.501..E.PPESEtitt....I.S t g
.......ITTOLILDHOLDCOMPUPPIPLPLIP.ID PRP,....C..E.,OtCEPPLEt TANKS tg1.11...0trgIN PPP...cow,.NO \ ' \ ' \ / ' '
P.C.ICCL-PPEC.MICALSOFttlt GAP itriERED B,UIPAP.1-0,ANY I.,111.....C.I.PEPIEGALUNDEttlE OR gtERALLATY. ' /r/tPr/ rgT t rt/ gt ' ggPtt P.gARRIS t 1 O'rgT
tr.Trum(g.FFSTORAO,Nr-OR P.P.,.ANY V?....POtERI ITO MM.Ct.Pt Pt,BEKE.IN THE RErttNII LPSPbb.... ,
CONDUCT.,BUSINESS,COMPrEPC.tb.PURCHASE-PPANSPC1101.OP PERFORM giORPt P....11....11-.5.0.,PR-Eb......01 rr./.r..)........t , .'.?-'tk
l'Pinr=ertIrrlI=bTOPbfO'bLrr.ItZrP=r'll'bfr=PtP-TinNTll.bngIPtl:e.TXdr0b'b-g12Lgt',PfrgV'Tr==rttrn/PrPP_I''.Tr'JgF=OnnflntIggg'r=gnr=bnC'rX-,rNr=GZtP-PTtIV?.g'Or"Zrtg'Eg"7t=t"nt?1-''e ,
/ ?ne/ gt/7 ?'g I
\
/
STANDARDS OF EVALUATION: ' . - ge mg D;PS r:2rR2t.2 6r'gPAA2:rICPPR=P,.."P...g.kb
E-.OX2 H?„AIB
CT gae A
grP -222;I;:TOf7r;b,,;P;,;u2.2,22—22'2” .
SCALE:1.2W
PPP.0101.8 g OF.tg,..g.t...Pt.getg,..1.1rEtbirtrtgl..-PrebOLLOWI,Pargt,......0g. 4t
(r ITEVPLOPMPIAI Mg„IP R...1 I... ? \ g
,
I APPECATONS POPP),RED.C.1 Mgt=Pbbrgb PEACCEPTEDOrt rou/recas DELINE,SDAS,/,.13.4.,fa,NON RettRAL ' gb ?Ptgbie / di , g
? 1 SITE INFORMATION '
DEVELOPIAP1,...THE NC h....57.EEP,WAttAIMALL AREA gr....TEL PYTHE POCC...1.01,1-gr 3.7
,
2 po„NlIALLSES„ALLB„13,1CI„TOTHO„LISTED,„,v1r(Mrd,„ERED,,,1 DISITICTIN„OrON S„ \/' g. 74..tr, g n
n , ..,.:gr,,TT..,,,===',-, ,,.. .=,N=:,,,„,,===. .
4440 '
,,,p gbg,LPtprbt,
It....tn...
?”.'1=17TtrrrDL"
tg g CtP,I g ttta..gb
I ......PERVItISSURfttRtg BASE,ONITIEW.E.ED gPC-TettrOVE...PIPI.gr rt.THE PRoFFRms
Rwwe'"'www"' gi
2.,A,22„22„2„.2222.
.... , \ , ,2:22,2.
..60...Onlgt.OR PROVETFCREATIVgArTgRNAINES I/1,1.0 gritt.....IRROPT-IPPErg-t.O. r , g 2 trtMgPi
6 APPLICANTSS11......EACOMPREHENSIVE GP...W..1r g it rt.....,TE.TURE n..00E...AP,
T %
APPROPRA.....,9 P.P0....041.Rt.,STI.7.3.111P,ILI.Wigt,tgeRt.NbICIPAggOTOBECONPUTAt rt. g r \
...UNTO,OPOUNOVIATERTM.RtPLISPAHAND SUPTAINtig IN it MPH,..1Cibint MP Ugg gbtlr P.P.P.I.b...pg g1,._ Pg ,,,,26bErt'A
g PTA,NORTHCAPSPINA
APPECT.PSUCtilt.R.N.5 g
7 ALL blgvr PTE,PLO,PPM.Art WITGROgNOWTTERT.-IgIrAglAbb IO N.MORE..29.0..0.PEP DAV P8P ACRE , , tgAttA,,,,,,v,grk ri....1Pgr gtrarvERI,,,,,,o,
.v....NE, N.
' g'gg'.17NEZP'SelbngrP=1.1n7t=',IFTP=IPPIt\XTgt=11(;1711fg=g4ng.V17-rtP=AgtgVO'lfgrrE ' \ 7\‘' ;5f: ..:t.ni /7:1117gIbT31
/ ,4b.Ap"' g DESIGN SPEEtt, '' ' t'n ,..,,,,,, „.„...„„..ggp.g.,.
t
LEGEND: _lo.„„s,„,,„„„„ ''." \ ' '
r .:7,3=';',.17,';`,1-.1=f7,:g;:::(::== 1;
/ .24;021-- 2 A , I n, TO?ItARt gl 5P,154PP rgt.P. 5
, ,x__ ',, ,----------C,
\ ' \
.._
,.,m,-,
. N WATERT., / 4-,,,,,5',e4c:.,k---A
F'ON.rgf)2='': ,' ',"
I, 1
, . WATER APEPER / 4,4;,- r, \‘‘, \ .„
/ / ,,,s,--,k, ,--," ,..;,, ,. __-----
ADJACENT gOblgr,AR .
ttt
..f,' cp , ,,,,,,%„
'
/ ' / 'Z'1,4, i•- '
::, \ \ fRONTSETPTCP. 40 As.ITA.1
SIDE SETBACK, POr 3.1,tr.1
04 POSr INDIC..„Lg..,
/ g R„RtbPg„: „ N. NOT/
‘, ,
. AIR R,EASEtbger.R.
/ pg,* \ 'nig.,
T N.I.L.ALLOW...Pt.: rgattg Mt, _bgnI"'W'S
22 • sn.nays,v,Eu mg.cy.E
kt. ggg4P,g7.Ng,M1 I
-",-• A
iNd M CUR,INLET / /7,-g tr.!. g'arte%
/ ,t.,, / gtifteett4tt. 'Ve'bt\\ ‘\' t \ \ \ REW.INNG.MWEDMI,LtiOt al t sb-T r
0 0 J..71.1150% /
.,40 'ec2
2 m fl....P.SECTION PPM , ggg, , g.//Pt T btOgrgr-*Plk T OH-It...tilt
'T- 2garbMIP=O.Wg=r!go T
,R0,0,00.,. `_',■ia\ GPAVELDRIVE. 09.1 SF rtb. CONSTRUCTION
c P.P..G...NIAIN ‘Z.‘ggi' t" ./..4.1e kb patigrttriltrt,t.. g.-rt,. %
/ C.4° tfgt , 't..Vt t?teln,ng.T.,?`tOP't\\' 1.:S.„7„\ \ ' r.bn.TE=1.111T,TSPOTCTPIN'ON'PAtilF7IPFSING7t.tr
C TO PeREVI.AND PEP1.-EDATSTAgXELJ \
r % ..POIMI.I.Ofilt/ORIVEr 5.0.10..
bp-TA, T.I.SP,P PI.
S ,
pg- g p LXISTINGOVE.E.g.CTRIC , Q' gr
(t
g PAng,REppurgEobl SPACE FM ETAPLOYFF rPFP ggt Obit Pr 1"."1 L,:'
\
\
.
„. „ EP1511,5,PrELE MAIN
togrttSET.R.I.SPRVIt
. • HOURS OP OPERATION:0,04.P...r70..AW.1
g...<.\ ,, 4
.74:Zr
.>,...z-FE7E ,
, ,47 , ,yfr 4,,,,,f,,,,t,..,,,- v, \-*?,... -;„.„,„
\
LIMITS OF DISTUPP.....NE '?tPa.ttget,Orn ?4,11•:".*\,‘ N 'a : 1.192ACRN .\
b. Tr .E.POTECTIONFENCE / /t 4Kt'/ ,-,;TiO.:.Tg ntAPp3P',trgVt.rqPrian. ‘g,t bgtrIA
g br gut.. , ( ) grggt-gptb t ttggbgtgttg? trgrgVittA.P'tgbegg % a j%rl P,.' Pt.P.g
??? / ?I?. ..,.;;14;;';22, 2-.22 22.2,2222;;A-;;;;;22;;;;;;A_A ,/-
,,-;:- f}/..,.\0-,:, 4gie,-.:4:',','.V.1.9'.\0,e..".:',0 x -'' % ''','"A i.
=...,
\ \ ,
„0 „../,''V ..".444.‹..P.0',„,01\4` /' 4,00c-f-A:0
/ - ,...„,,01,-/-,,,,,,,.',' ..a.ka/V. ,., ,.../ ...z.,.'
/ '-', P. e' '.,'4tAtWtt, '
- --;
22;
,-22
'->y 2- , Q-.,2;2.1.-22;;2;2.:
-•,`:,-
/ ,J, /1-, „
/ ''>>75,--, A- ".,.,,,,-k,,, ..g,'a, ';;;;,;;42;,.. ":0,2,2;22,2;,„-2,;22.•,,,',.;;.p,,4 ,,,,,i,i.,,*,,,;\ ,,,,,,L,,,,,,:\ ■
fEtE.Of f PROPEPrlit.
cn
7 ,7- 4:Azi,l'
Z g
/ ,4
/ A,„4-'.='\:.',, ; V. ,,Ai;:''-m01-”.
/ / A. ,,,,'..:,- 6-,,',:iv,,,,,:r., ,„„,-,„, .f t A.,•., •,,.a.,..,,,,
N---x
;2 4-
, ------T\ g,1=Zi
#Wt,., ,,x„ R.„ gt, .......P „.... p,
/ggPg.itgb tbbt. .4T-Prt grTg ?tit .,,,e rrtfgg,g gt ttgrkPqk rAggt-ttt.., 'tteg-- P ....rt tilt.\
....3t? StkInt gkebt".:Ot'.!rtt r
V N, bPfttfetVgf..-54'kg?P'7..t-.4TP;tnib.btr'n"tn.bb "ki\ti,%ntgr g\-- t. b.
,
P
. / / • -—
/,,,:ii,..0.,441,11,,, ,... ,1:e .,:gog.,„ —1- —
//,,,.....______, x_-.-::-.__- _--L-' ,, _,,T,,,T._,iTv., , _,_-, -c.o-- -/ -.-' '''I'-''''''''-'r__':''''''L--'-''-':'-',:---:---r"'c:-4'-' ''-''--,',,-,:::;::,,-'''-4'-j.--"--""-"''—'—'-'''
/ / ,' /\,--igit,';',A.ON1014.1,,,,fflitaXV.MR4ictiglitii46..I..liegaikFntl,\.7.0\-il-.0;,.:0/5',i:15.1„, ;',/ ;0 9 1 r21
cr) z
6,-■ .4 1
\-....:',":::::""'"'"' 1 `,ZT:=n,',,t7=:T■ '^""v'"-/ '"',V,V,T.,"4 , --- ',-,--:,
/
811.2 H ..,.
,,,,1 ',
—u"---- I '',E7,1EiRP'' gpogg.No,
12-0191
-7`, GRAPHIC SCALE
‘...t-tr SYPEI NO
Know .what's below. 5/5,IT.)
Call before you dig. I incl.50 ft. C-4
/�i
` % r(III
//� A GENERAL NOTES
Oe
hR
� R,R ,
ORANGE am mEuRE, 0IMEDE_w a,0, "u
�,oA��
X \
1 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PROVISIONS: � r
te,
f �/
MU MUSE,.10 CONVEY;ALLS`Or0,001,TO 01,00,1,1.;101 P0;01 E SIBSURFACEDR010000 6110 BE L0,0 �E o" °"mow °T
/ EXHIBIT M E, E / ✓ �• 1 y A `‘
h M n
� ,. -</"I
mEavi 1 z z \ �4.c: 'o E / R I 8
-3 —323333tt
/333,34/
w " 3.3--- 3/3',333333k ��,
� . .
" '
,
3/3` 33#1A / —
• . •t
F i \ \"p \ \
o uE 0,,,0,,,,,,, \ � �A_ 4
' 7 - \
7\ \
/ / / ; 9 \ • --
,-- �' , 'NOT
f
� �
/ �� /��y � � � CONSTRUCTION:1 .5/ ,z - L \ \
• ,, i F
, , / " \ 2—/
/ //.99''0,99' //1.929,5"E 1.',0,10,092 09/9E/9,9.9010,9e\ -901, \ "2'E 9 ,
/ \ LEGEND:
tt \ CI°wx\ , V FIRE D17 CONNECTION,CI
O
u
� n
. /6q,,-:6 -41L,',-,-66,6.,,,e,11-`,' I.1,1-,1,-- ..61-6,6,' 'z.::,61,-6, 3 1' \.,:,,,,,_,,,,..:)(17,7F., , ,,_/ 1/ /� / i 3 a?r' S r 4.4:1‘ s� y V� v- t/ A as o "...E,".m°�� �F� Z tis,■t*y a A F/ / i , t r -`#"$ 4 ' ' ° z ,tiE -r s " \ � L
Z/
/ / _,} •_ G W o-4 m Q v
"
811 °.., 33333333 °120191
, SCALE
Know what's below. c °°" 1 °"'E'` `""""` \ \ n ..,NO
Call before you dig. '"' S0"
C5
REQUESTED BUFFERS
SAO a
D
6 ��v o
1 NG DETAIL
-....F ; I ,� h\ / 4✓ ... Fop "T .+Y
C N." L,of / I so�mEa"Pa��ar,.E ' '` '',',1,,S4`a,,GFE,EX UNDERSCORE,)REETR 1E0,0
'� is T''" oao �Raa ®asp s �'
-x z'�3 .'
�� �a e, j �R,� i �� � '
aoR.a = �, � $ e s -�
STAKING DIAGRAM TREE GUYING DIAGRAM GUY SPACING DETAIL ''+''. -
z waKING DIAGRAM EES,a«Rw A qoT TO SCALe3 �1 � �• 3s '` ""?'• y t
, y Y mar TO SCALD aar rA SCALE ``� `.� I T - cw ;..- � ,�- �0�.. �a F
ai7°'° I- TYP.ORANGE COUNTY REQUESTED 30'TYPE B BUFFER
it .5�
GENERAL NOTES: PLANTING PLAN FOR MILE BRANCH ROAD&NC HWY 57 @'
SCALE I 20
..�a RFr�xw,�a�:�x SE�H,� soN N�o�Ea,.HOn RO. �' // c �d a -O
/� fa3 <T�
® ' tY' O AF-'�
a , / ''//asn�L,o. R�sw� - sr� ° ' ., "W�, ,
a
ror'„6E000 � �
,o avw'�oFA
TREE PLANTING AND STAKING DETAIL aoo o '''''''''''11 ro„ �«�� „
Y T Y P ORANGE COUNTY REQUESTED BUFFER PLAN71NG PLAN :ic,,,,,..,,,,r
a''�I� '=z "� / ,F / t _—T 1- FOR SOUTHERN PROPERTY BOUNDARY ' c..;.- y ,y y ,U
L
a NOT FOR
°`” PR ED SAO v. .� �,'1.
�r , +' v S(AS SHOWN).
�"f� � /I F AanoeEFrEfis €� -1� ��` r( '''9', AL t/
,� H 7 � " �r; sry ,,,°,4241,,,.,
� �,� oE�nErvE a ' a�ate„ „aaaE� � H �soEe4.,.
// '/ v , r,o,a,E,„.--EEC
CONSTRUCTION
If}'' �i- a.cxa / �- d�' \ o,
o� �K.a„a.a 1 a '� r
SCALE,20
\ P.PROPOSED 20 BUFFER PLANTING PLAN r g
/ ' ,� 1 FOR MILE BRANCH ROAD&NC HWY57
C CEEPTO AL,VET THE EH
SHRUB PLANTING DETAIL /�
1 -: �� � /_I A�/ T0 FFER PLANTING PLAN %M t4
vE K y ` a v
• e ' .y
1
,, 3�,, ono E/A ; `�� ' � t °
/ Cdr W
i
F � � � Z
y
/ SA yd,;4,,,, ,..,c.:::”:=',1",,,a.::i 4'''., :: :
/ ;aa 4,,,..2,,.....;. .:, 41:174,:,.,,,,,
-17''7:...-,,,,,
1 ` ,F = `�3`,�'',i ' J /1 Y\ i �y, i
u
A
811 �� .M,.
� / {- ,.�� � �� �'B yyw"y^aw,�s �� � �.�aA �� �,� P"';')-;191
. I I ane[rtc sca,>; 5 .�"F"i C k"`„ ttaC y0
�/ I e _ \ \ hYS� t� � sre2-A Bi L-1
Know whaPs belOW. .HOU.r�a,�.rPw+ i,�.n so:�
Call before you dig. / anP H.,. ,,,,o»s,,,. _>
C-6
Attachment 3 34
Michael Harvey
From: Terry Hackett
Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2012 9:20 AM
To: 'Kelly Sue Woody'; Michael Harvey
Cc: Chad Abbott
Subject: RE: 12-0191 Affordable Rougemont Self Storage
Kelly,
Thank you for your updated submittal for the proposed Affordable Rougement Self Storage project. Based on this
updated submittal, the project is proposing to convey stormwater from the proposed self-storage buildings and other
impervious surfaces underneath Mile Branch Road to a proposed engineered stormwater control device or "best
management practice" (BMP). The proposed BMP is a 10,000 square foot bioretention cell with internal water storage.
Your submittal also included preliminary nutrient calculations. With the addition of the bioretention it appears that
stormwater nutrient loadings will be met. The bioretention should also meet the peak flow and total suspended solid
reduction requirements. Therefore, I believe the updated proposal will meet Orange County's stormwater requirements
as outlined in Section 6.14 of our Unified Development Ordinance.
However, please understand that this is a preliminary review. A detailed stormwater management plan, as well as an
erosion control plan submittal will be required once the project has been finalized. At that time county erosion
control/stormwater staff will complete a detailed review.
We look forward to working on this project with you as things progress. If you need any additional information from
me, please let me know.
Thanks,
Terry
Terry L. Hackett
Stormwater Resource Officer
Erosion Control Divsion
Orange County Planning & Inspections Department
131 W. Margaret Lane
Hillsborough, NC 27278
919-245-2588
From: Kelly Sue Woody fmailto:kellysue.woody @summit-enaineer.coml
Sent: Friday, August 31, 2012 2:40 PM
To: Terry Hackett
Cc: Chad Abbott
Subject: 12-0191 Affordable Rougemont Self Storage
Terry,
1
35
Attached is the Grading &Storm Drainage plan for"Affordable Rougemont Self Storage". Please note that the plan has
been revised since your last issued comments. Let us know if you have any new comments otherwise please provide a
revised memo noting that all comments have been addressed to Mr. Harvey. We will be happy to discuss continued
concerns with you if needed.
Thanks for your help,
Kelly Sue Woody
Civil Designer, Land Development Branch
Phone: (919) 732-3883
Fax: (919) 732-6676
DI ON mak etstOontwuNO StrintES
Creatively Inspired-Technically Executed
b1"ON 0 /ii »J//4•
, �ti 11L ]
www.summit-enaineer.com
11010i III'" se c onsii er n v to nrest nt bet w' IIP n
2
36
Michael Harvey
From: David Sykes
Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2012 9:21 AM
To: Michael Harvey
Subject: chandler self storage
Michael,
I have reviewed the latest plan for the Chandler storage facility.The access roads throughout the property meet the
width requirements that are required by the fire code.The revised plan does include an increase in turning radius for the
access road around the outside of the storage facility. I have also been advised there will be a key pad at the gate for 24
hour access to the facility. All questions regarding emergency response and access have answered to my
satisfaction. Thanks.
David Sykes
Assistant Fire Marshal
Orange County Emergency Services
510 Meadowlands Drive
Hillsborough,NC 27278
Office: (919)245-6125
Cell: (919)537-2148
Fax: (919)732-8130
Email: dsykes(aico.orange.nc.us