The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutPH ORD-2002-024 Discussion of Carrboro Land Use Oradinance Amendments in the Northern Transition Area ORANGE COUNTY 027 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS ACTION AGENDA ITEM ABSTRACT O�T Meeting Date: August 26, 2002 Action Agen a Item No. -- SUBJECT: Discussion of Carrboro Land Use Ordinance Amendments in the Northern Transition Area DEPARTMENT: Planning and Inspections PUBLIC HEARING: (Y/N) No ATTACHMENT(S): INFORMATION CONTACT: • Staff Analysis of Amendments Craig N. Benedict, ext 2592 • Agenda Item D(1)from 5-28-02 Gene Bell, ext. 2589 Carrboro Board of Aldermen Meeting TELEPHONE NUMBERS: • 5-28-02 Board of Aldermen Minutes Hillsborough 732-8181 Chapel Hill 968-4501 Durham 688-7331 Mebane 336-227-2031 PURPOSE: To consider a County response to text amendments in Article 15 of the Carrboro Land Use Ordinance concerning Village Mixed Use (VMU) and Office/Assembly (O/A) districts. BACKGROUND: Proposed amendments to Carrboro's Land Use Ordinance (LUO) were presented at a Town public hearing on May 7, 2002. The minutes from the hearing are included as Attachment B to item D(1)from the May 28 Board of Aldermen meeting referenced above (the complete agenda for the hearing can be accessed at www.ci.carrboro.nc.us/Mayor& Board of Aldermen/Meeting Agendas/Item D(3)). The LUO amendments are applicable throughout Carrboro's planning jurisdiction, which includes the Northern Transition Area (NTA). Pursuant to the Joint Planning Agreement, the amendments were submitted to Orange County for review, but without the context of their potential usage in an upcoming rezoning application involving the proposed Winmore development. The Board of Aldermen voted on the amendments on May 28, 2002, approving, or approving with modifications, all but two of the 18 proposed changes. Those not approved were: 1. Allow Board of Aldermen to approve projects whose development standards do not specifically meet all provisions spelled out in the LUO. 2. Allow sidewalks and walkways to be brick or concrete with brick borders no longer required. Agenda item D(1) from the May 28 Board of Aldermen meeting is included as an attachment. Winmore and the LUO amendments were discussed at County Commissioner meetings on June 6 and again on June 24. Planning staff was directed to prepare the attached analysis of g\Comprehensive Planning Div\Gene\2002 Public Hearings\Aug 26\Carrboro LUO Amdts Abstract.doc\8-13-02\gb 1 0 2 the amendments for additional iscussio August 26. The amendments were reviewed for consistency with the Joint Planning Agreement and Facilitated Small Area Plan for Crbro"s N earn Study Area adopted in 1999 and staff comments regarding sistency or inconsistency, with the JPA are noted, Please also note that staff review pursu,ant to the JP s based primarily on changes that affect the land use plan .e., density, intensity). Although Carr has already acted on,the amendments, Orange County may still ish to submit comments. FINANCIAL IMPACT: None at this tire. RECOMMENDATION(S),; The Administration recommends that the Board receive the informations and discuss the desirability of a formal response to Ciro. p p p p \Comprehensive Planning v\Ciene\2002 Public He fin Mu 26\Carrboro LUO its A str c . c -1 - 2 ANALYSIS OF AMENDMENTS TO THE CARRBORO LAND USE ORDINANCE Prepared by Orange County Planning Staf, July 18, 2002; Revised August 14, 2002 The following table summarizes requested amendments to Article 15 of the Crrbro Land Use Ordinance (LO). - The text of the amendments is contained in Attachment A, SAN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE LAND USE ORDINANCE PROVISIONS RELATING TO VILLAGE MIXED-USE AND OFFICE/ASSEMBLY DEVELOPMENTS."' The amendments are applicable to C rrb ro's planning jurisdiction, including the Northern Transition Area, and most were requested in conjunction with the Winmore proposal. The table., modeled on a similar one prepared by the Carrboro Planning staff, *Identifies the amendment, action taken by the Board of Aldermen on May 28., applicable section numbers from Attachment A, and i m pti cati o ns for J o int Pla nning. U Mess otherwise noted. comments relate to consistency with the Facilitated Small Area Plan for Ca boro's Northern Study Area., hereafter SAP, that was incorporated into the Joint Planning Area Land Use Plan in February 1999. Ont.-P-lah' -Bo6rdActioh,4t7_Ft ec:;;9 M R_ equest6d"A P Ica 10 1 Sec. 15-176.2 (a) and ); Not Adopted 21304 Inconsistent. Sec. 2.3.A.of the Joint Penn Allows Board of Aldermen to Agreement addresses the admix is ration of approve projects whose Chapel Hill and Carrb ro ordinances in the development t nd rds do not Transition Areas. It states that administration specifically meet all provisions .a. 1shall be carried out in a manner so as to spelled out in L O. Board's insure that a developer complies with all decision on Blaster Plea could applicable ordinance requirements and the terms be more or less restrictive than and conditions of any permit issued by the otherwise specified for VMU respective towns.#P rojcs. 2 Sec. 15-15 (92.1 ): Creates Adopted 5,6 Consistent. "Encourage detached buildings new accessory detached behind houses, in the form of garage apartments -dwelling (ADD) definition with a or backyard cottages. ' (page 3 ) limit of 750 square feet (petitioner requested 900 square feet). Allows ADDS on lots throughout town where accessory apartments currently allowed, gCnVrensiv 1nnig Div\Gene\2002 Public Hugs\Au 26\Analysis of Cro LUO Changes for Aug 26 PH. -1 M2b ANALYSIS OF AMENDMENTS TO THE CARRBORO LAND USE ORDINANCE P� red b Oran a County Planning Staff,_duly 18 2002; Revised August 14 2002 -a - -� �.�_ -ter �._ > - -- -�• - -- - - �' ._ �- ` � - - _ a e - `- - - to '&-_A_ - �� - 3 Sec, 15-176.2(b)(1 ): - ADDS Alt rn ative 1 7 Consistent. Alt rn tiv is con I'stent with not count toward density Adopted - recommendations in SAP: the overall target allocation for a property. Two densities for the mixed use area is 5 wellirr - alternatives resented: 1 Hi units per acre." (page 7) and her residential -allows ADDS In addition to total densities, In fora, will he allowed with the number of permissible ie dwelling provision of publicly-beneficial development units ,an 2 ADD to be features, such as affordable housing, parks and courted as a half dwell in pit. o n and so on." e 8 4 Sec. 15-176.2(f)(3)(g): Adopted 8 C onsistent. "Additional elements., such as street Increase building height from and building design standards, should be 2.5 to 3.5 storms and add incorporated into the new mixed-use area(s), but three-story build-up lire of Carrboro should be' careful not to over-regulate between 30 and 35 feet -the fora -development. Street and building design standards should he a part of any good rye -trditinal-style development, and these elements can be approved through .the site plan review rote ss. ' - a 57 5 Sec. 15-176.2(f)(4)(b): Adopted 9 Consistent. "Aditinl elements, such as-street Increase building height in and building design standards, should be storefront and townhouse use incorporated into the new mixed-use area(s), but areas from 2.5 st (tes and 35 Crrbro should be careful not to over-regulate feet to 3.5 stories and 419 feet. the form of development. Street and building design standards should be a part of any good no-traditional-style development, and these elements can be approved through the site pion review r c s .: a 57 .2 4 ; Ire Not Adopted 10 Consistent. "Additional elements, such as street storefront and townhouse use and building design standards, should be areas sidewalks and walkways incorporated into the new mixed-use area(s), but may a brick or concrete; brick Grrbro should be careful not to over-regulate borders no longer required. the form of development. Street and building design standards should he a part of any good no-traditional-style development, and these elements can be approved through the site plan review r n L.' a 57) gACounprehensive Plate Div\Gene\2002 Public Hugs\Au 2 ly is of Cariboto LUO Changes for Aug 26 H.doc\7-18 2 g 2 ANALYSIS OF AMENDMENTS TO THE CARR ORS LAND USE ORDINANCE Prepared by Orange County Planning Staff, July 18.t 2002; Revised August 14, 2002 S 104ti ri I _� V-1 R-1,166hthbI .6 Itdrr 4- uestdd-Amen A_ ilqMN 44 M PT 7 Sec. 15-176.2 (f)(4)(9)(1 )(2): At Adopted with 11 Consistent. "'Additional elements, such as street least one trash can and one modification. and building design standards,, should be recycling receptacle of incorporated into the new mixed-use area(s), but approved design in each block Provides for place- Carrboro should be careful not to over-regulate and Increase spacing 'interval meat of recycling the form of development. Street and building for public benches at bus stops receptacles and design standards should be a part of any good and Green spaces from 50 feet clustering of neo-traditional-style development,, and these to no greater than 200 feet on a benches at high- elements can be approved through the site plan block. activity areas, if review process." (page 57) needed. 8 Sec. 5-176.2(f)( )(m): Adopted with 12 Consistent. "Additional elements, such as street Materials in at least one-half of modification. and building design standards, should be the buildings surroundings the incorporated into the new mixed-use area(s), but greens shall be limited to a All materials other Carrboro should be careful not to over-regulate diversity of brick textures and than b6ck subject the form of development. Street and building colors, with wood subject to to review of design standards should be a part of any good review of Appearance Appearance neo-traditional-style development, and these Commission. Commission and elements can be approved through the site plan permit-issuing review process." (page 57) authoqK. 9 Sec. 15-176.2(f)(5)(b) and (c): Adopted 13 Consistent. "Additional elements, such as street Allows deviation from and building design standards, should be prescribed minimum lot widths, incorporated into the new mixed-use area(s), but yard, and separation Carrboro should be careful not to over-regulate requirements if Board of the form of development. Street and building Aldermen has approved project design standards should be a part of any good as Architecturally Integrated rye -traditional-style development., and these Subdivision$ elements can be approved through the site plan review process."' (page 57) C4 gAComprehensi've Planning Div\Gene\2002 Public Hey rinp\Aug MAnalysi's of Carrboro LUO Changes for Aug 2 6 PH..doc\7-18NO2\gb 3 ANALYSIS OF AMENDMENTS TO THE CARRBOR0 LAND USE ORDINANCE Prepared by Orange County Planning Staff, July 1 , 2002; Revised August 14, 2002 CAP _ _ °e m - _ a� s 1- - -in 10 Sec. - -176.2 - Adopted modified 14 Inconsistent. The area is not in a water-supply inoe s impervious coverage amendm nt � �� lower impervious s ov g is from 50 65%. supportive of objective to "Mitigate potential Some lots may impact of development on streams and creeks. exceed 50%,, but (page 42 Impervious cover- - ge remains 5 for all of the lots in residential use area; allocation to each lot finalized at time final plat recorded. Sec. 1 5- 76.E 5 and Adopted 15 Consistent. ""Additional elements. such as street (5): Fire-exit stairs may he - and building design standards, should be located on a side other than the incorporated- into the new mixed-use area(s), but rear of a garage/ADD and off- Carib ro should be careful not to over-regulate street parking for ADDS shall the form of development. Street and building be located to the side or rear. design standards should be part of any good nee traditional-style development, and these elements Gan be approved through the site plan review c ss. ' a 5r 2 Sec. 1 5-1 76.2 8 b Adopted 16 Consistent. `Town-wide design guidelines Developer shall plant or retain related to parking., tree preservation, site design', sufficient trees so that for every and architectural character, as proposed in the 5 feet of street frontage there 1993 Draft Townwide reign Guidelines, would V s at (east one deciduous tree help to preserve the charier and natural beauty (page 67) that will have a trunk diameter of the Study Area. of at (east 12 inches at maturity. AC r ensi Planning Div\Gen#\2002 Public He�gAA ales f C ll r LU Changes Aug ��. � � � � 4 ANALYSIS OF AMENDMENTS TO THE CAR ORO LAND USE ORDINANCE Prepared by Orange County Planning Staff, July 18, 2002; Revised August 14, 2002 4MO lc�eiti t6d men meOA OW ion oin -Platir 0 '.-Act A 13 Sec. 15-177(a)(2) (3)(6) and Adopted 17 Consistent. "Additional elements, such as street (7): Reduce applicability of and building design standards,, should be Vernacular Architectural -incur into the new mixed-use area(s),, but Standards to 50% of dwelling Carrboro should be careful not to over-regulate u ni Ks. revise roof pitch, siding the form of development. Street and building reveal,, chimney placement, design standards should be a part of any good and ciarage door provisions. neo-traditional-style development, and these elements can be approved through the site plan review process." (page 57)_ 14 Sec. 15-291(8): Specifies Adopted with 18 Consistent. "'Town-wide design guidelines parking space requirements for modification. related to parking , tree preservation, site design, uses permitted in VMU and architectural character, as proposed in the developments. Adopted text 1993 Draft Townwide Design Guidelines, would provides for some help to preserve the character and natural beauty on-street parking to of the Study Area." (page 67) be counted. 15 Sec. 15-220 (new): Specifies Adopted 19 Consistent. "'Coordinate transportation planning that VMU developments may for the Study Area with Chapel Hill and other use NC Department of relevant agencies." (page 64) and Transportation Traditional "Incorporate transportation concepts which Neighborhood Development support mixed-use development." (page 64) Guidelines. 16 Sec. 15-14 (Table of Adopted 20 Consistent. "Provide for adequate commercial - Permitted Uses): Adds limited space such that citizens are able to conduct retail uses to provide commercial transactions within walking distance opportunity for employees or of their homes." (page 44) and nearby residents of O/A "New mixed-use classifications could be developments to obtain basic developed by integrating current B3, R2 or R37 retail goods. and 0 zoning classifications and adding some new elements." (page 57) Div\Gene�2002 Public He s\Aug 26\Analysis of Carrboro LUO Changes for Aug 26 PH.doc\7-18\02\gb g TonVrehensive Planning aring 5 ANALYSIS O F AMENDMENTS TO THE CARRBO RO LAND USE ORDINANCE Prepared by Orange County Plann" g Staff CAP in July 18, 2002; Revised August 14., 2002 g&ef 17 Sec. 15-136(l 0) and (11): Adopted 21 Consistent. SAP doesn't set a specific figure, but Retail uses limited to no more does state: "Flexibility should be allowed in the than 25% of the developed amount of commercial space permitted in these gross square footage of any areas. A baseline figure for commercial development. development should be set, but higher commercial densities should be permitted w4th the provision of publicly-beneficial development features such as parks, bicycle paths, and affordable housing." s57-58). 22,23 Consistent. Makes appropriate cross-references 18 Sec. 15-176.2(f)(5)(g) and (3): Adopted Replaces the term "Accessory to item 2. Dwelling-Unit (A )1 1E with Accessory Detached Dwelling- (ADD) and replaces 900 with 750 _§,quare feet. gXornprehensive Planning Div\Gene\2002 Public Hearings\Aug 26V�mlysls of Cadboro LUO Changes for Aug 2 6 PH.dor.\7-18\02\gb 6 035 BOARD OF ALDERMEN ITEM NO. D AGENDA ITEM ABSTRACT MEETING DATE: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 TITLE. Continuation of Public Hearing: Land Use Ordinance Amendments Related to Visage Mixed-Use and Office-Assembly Developments DEPARTMENT: PLANNING PUBLIC HEARING: YES X N ATTACHMENTS- FOR INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Draft Ordinance Patricia McGuire —918-7327 �B. Excerpt of minutes, may ,7, 2002 Mike Brou,gh—929-3905 C. Advisory Board recommendations Summary of Requested Changes/Recommendati"Otis PURPOSE The Board of Aldermen held a public hearing on May 7, 2002 to receive comment on proposed changes to the Land Use Ordinance related to Village Mixed-Use and Office/Assembly developments. The Board continued this pubfici hearing until May 28, 200,E in order to .11 the Planning Board to complete its review of the proposed amendment. The Administration recommends that the Bow of Aldermen adopt the proposed ordinance, with noted modifications. INFORMATION Robert L. Chapman, III and other associates in the Winmore Land Management LLC submitted a request for . land use ordinance amendments related to the design of a village mixed-use development.mixed-us A draft ordinance that addressed this request, and included changes r l t to ffi e/assem developments as well, was prepared and presented for public review on May 7, 2002, A number of citizens offered comments on the draft nr inan , as noted in the MM' utes of the meeting (Attachment B). The Board of Aldremen continued to public hearing to ay 28, at the request the P anni'n Board, in order to allow additional time for that Board to complete its review of the draft ordinance. The Planning Board completed its review on May 16. All advisory board recommendations are attached (Attachment Q. A summary of the requested enge s, +Mated with comments are recd ndatin , s also attached A ttac,hment D . ADMINISTRATION'S RECOMMENDATION The Administration recommends that the Board of Aldermen adopt the draft ordinance (Attachment A') with noted modifications. M 036 w p N 0 THIS PAGE HAS BEEN LEFIr BLANK INTENTIONALLY P P ., N 0, 31 ORDINANCE AN E G THE LAND USE ORDINANCE PROVISONS RELATING TO VILLAGE MMED-USE OFF CEIASS Y EVE PUMNTS THE BOARD OF ALDERMEN OF THE TOWN' OF CARRBORDAINS: Section 1. The section references contained i this ordinance ue to chapter 15 of the Cam' oro Town Code, the Carrboro Land Use Ordinance,. Section 2. The opening paragraph of Subsection 15-176.2 is amended to r 4 as follows: In a Village mixed use development a max of ten percent of th total gross acreage of the tract, or five acres, whichever is less, may be used for purposes permissible M the B-3T or OA districts, subject to any conditions or limitations (including stations on the types o ' essile uses) contained w the Tern Psns offs section Notwithstanding the foregoings the Board f A dermen may, in approwng a Mw ter Plan for the development, impose greater use limitation on the development than those lumpo=4 by the regulation of this chapter applicable to the B-3T or OA districts, or allow the develper to deviate from the use limitatiow imposed by the other prov Uions of his section. 'The developer .shall be required to identify and JusW aH deva' dous rom Section 15-176.2 and the rest of Chapter IS., Section 3. Subsecti01 5 6.2 a is amended to read as follows: Wig the portion of the tract developed for commercial purposes, the regulations (other ' than use regulations, which are g governed the provisions immediately above) applicable r r e y zoned B,-3T sal apply An SIAM: subject the mg .& WN-94A W46 r f hs section. Notw As and g he foreg ing, the Boar rm n t, i g Master Planfor the development, allow or require the developer to dev a fr m the provisions of h section or the chapter (other than use regulations, which are.governed" by the provisions immediately above) that would otherw Ue be applicable to the development. The developer shall be required to identify and justify all deviations from Section 15-176.2 and the rest of Chapter ,-;P. Section 4. The opening paragraph of Subsection 15,476.2(b) is amended to read as foilows Portions f the trot got developed accordance with the provisions or su� mection a above may be developed accordance with the provisions 'the cater applicable t property that is zoned R-10, except as those provisions are modified by the provisions of 038 this Sec � " � standing h reg gs, the rd f Aldermen may,, n a n a Master Plan for the d� oilmen allow r require the �� developer to devi f m prova' i0irls 014 his section or hisi chapter that would othewise be applicable to the development. The developer,shall be regained to idea � r and *us all deviations from Section 54 .2 and to rent of Chapter 159 p (b) n d Section 5. Section 15,115 is amended y�o adding a,new definition'(92.1) to read as M follows (92.1) RESIDENCE, PRIMARY WITHACCESSORYDETACHED DWELLRVG, A residential use i which there a located on 'the same lot primary, s"191 � residence, . .second dwelling that is detachedfivm the primary residence but that may be attached to another accessory building such as a garage, and which second dwelling unit comperes not more than jifly percent of the gross floor area of the primary residence nor more than a total of 750 square feet, exclusive of garag . Section 6.� The first scntence of Subsection i - 82(b) i's mitten to read as l ws: � c e apartment, and prm ry"Two-family c n �� tm residences with an accessory detached dwelling shall be allowed only on lotshaving at least 50 the minimum square footage required [under subsection for one dwelling unit on a lot win such dace Section p 7. Subsection 15-176.2(b)(1) is amended by adding PL new subsection 6&e7 to read as follows: [Alternative 11 en a lot w developed as a primary resmce with, an accessory detached dwelling, the accessory dwelling shall be permissible in addition. the number of dwelling.units otherwis e �" � �� "� �� .. Section. [Alternative2j. en a lot i's developed nm r residence with accessory detached dwelling, the accessory dwelling shall be counted only as hatfdwelling uni fo p rposes of determining the.number of dwelling units permissible within the entire �� tract. is Section 8. Subsection 15- 6.�2f) 3 ��ded by adding � e the end end this subsection, so tha t reads as follows# ainent visual 9. The b� � � �� o�c height establishes pror ern of a building and defines its proportion in region to the sit It should vary, with n more than sixty 60 consecutive sect of the buildup line having a sitar cone or rooffine, and be tw n one and three and one-half stories height, A two-story buildup line can range from 20 to 25 feet above average Draft Ordinance R l ,tin to and O A Developments Page 2 r 039 Wound leveL. A three-story build-up line can age ftom 30 to 35 feet abow average dun level. Sectors 9. Subsection 1 -176.2 (f)(4) is amended to read as follows, b. Maxvhum height regulations are 2,15%, 49 feet and three and a half soties. - Section 10. Subsection 15 476.2 (f)(4)(f)(1) is amended to read as follows, 1, Be constructed, frisk or concrete i such a way that they do not impede accessibility. Section I I- Subsections 15-176.2 f)(4)(g) (1) and (2) a are amended to rid as , oll ws: 1. At least one bwh can and one recycling receptacle of Vproved design in each lock 2 Public benches of approve design at bus stops, green spaces, and at ervl of no mater than -50 200 feet along both sides of ow each block and at lesser Intervals and/or, required clusters, as appropriate 1.e. high- activity areas due to to nature of surrounding es . Section 12. Subsection 1,5-176.2 f)( ) is amended to read as, follows: " M. Mate the exterior of at least one-h # f the buildings sounding the greens shall be limited . i rs ty of brick textures and colors, with ... . woo berg subject to the review of the Appearance Commission and the approval of the em -issuing authority. Awning are encouraged. Connnercial grade windows and doors shall be used, With wood encourage and other matefials being subject to the review, of the -Appearance Cornzassion and,the approval of th permit-issuing authonky. Section 13. Subsection 1 5- 76.2 1) 5 (b) and c are amended to read as follows: b. The m murn lot width at the building line shall be 40 feet unless the Board of Aldermen has also approved the development as an architecturally integrated subs' v Uffi on as described in Sec � on 15-187, Variations in the principal building position and orientation shall be encouraged, the following . . um standards, sal be observed: F yard: 15 feet n* rnum. (but 8 feet to ant porches or steps) and 25 feet maximum; Rear yard: 30 feet mimmurn for pnncipal buildings and 5 Draft Ordinance Rel VMUand OA Development Page 3 04, 0 feet for � �� Si e 20 separation for principal buildings, with no side yard less than. 5 feet unless the Boar' ofAldermen has also approved the development, as an architecturally integrated subdivision as dco ed in, Section 5- Section 4. Subsection 57 .2 (f)(5)(d) amended to read as follows: MAXi gm,d. The us coverage shall b 5 percent w for all Of �� is use arm Impervious surface area maY, be gn Creased awe .50 pert so 1009 as all addWOnal SlOrm water VOIUM e retained on site and no dhrg I's allowed Allocation each lot shall be phattized at the indicated on the conditional use pert plans and must be time a fmal plat ' recorded. For mule-pie projects, the final allocation shall be phase, N further reallocation o m�� a grace coverage for lots in this use area shall be allowed after the final plat has been recorded. Section 15. Subsection "15-176.2 # and 5) are amender. by adding a new phrase at the end of the subsection to read as follows., 1 4. Exterior u a . re,-exit stem mie on any � de s Accessory Detached Dwellings except their rear, except cases ��ADD is located above a garage., 5. Ali off-street parking for cessory Detached Dwellings shall be located the Side rear, as � ee Section 6. Subsection 5-176.2 ,(f)(8) s amended by adding a new sentence at the end offs subs=uon to read as follows: uT trees shall be provided ilong each side of all streets, public or private, exist proposed. a des � also a massed n �� , focal points along a cue M the roadway. In locations where- healthy and mature shade trees currently exist, the requIrments, or new des may be waived or modified. Section 15,315 of the Chapter notwithstanding, the developer shall f the either plant or retain sufficient tree so that, between the paved portion w street and a line runi!ing parallel and twenty-jive feet from the center line of the street there U eve rtyfee ofsrfnge �� average of one deciduous �� have when �� y mature a ink least twelve n � n diameter, Trees may be placed un f Ormly. . M Section 17. Subsection 1 a)(2), (3) (6) and aM ed-to read as WlOw : Draft dice Relating, to VMTJ and OA Development Page (a) The following standards are reconunended for all subdivisions of 5 or more UMUs and shall pertain to 50% of the dwelling um*ts in the subdivision. (2) Roofs shall be as follows. a a, Main roof Pitch — 8112 to 12/12 . Lower roof pitches —3/12 to 4-5112 C, Roofs shall have a overhang of sixteen (16) inches on all eaves and gables. (3) Clapboard or shingle s shall have fog five and if- exposure. (6) Any chimney must be located win the body of the house mess it is an all-masonry chimney,. (7) Gage doors shat be nine 9) feet wide or under. Door shall not face the street unless the garage s placed at least 10 feet behind the Principal dwelling. Section 18. Subsection 5-291 g' (Table of Pg Requirements) is amended by adding the following m appropriate nwnencal, order: .,yww,Y .,, ", .r ",* , • .,� :^dl'!'^M+"'Y';^^• m.w ^^ '^a"^* ",""r" ,,"" ""-r,^ "■'.""^'"." r, "Yv 7" ' .'M -u„—■ ",.v-,.w .gab,• - , ia"w,pw', w .. ,_,mi-T �_ R .,__ A. r^"' ■ail""" .+"," .a .�' �.r+�u.,, .�,', -^ +�,,;",-, � n a, a, ,ww ti •""" ' ",,,,,rta "'. ' ' ,X .' ,. ,. .,*X � 4■"wu,lL,, ,«" ,_.w *,+'° d■h:� ms^ -w* •_x•l`.,r"^,s ,. ltir .rq " r,� *�"�-,:,�.nn,._ Y .,L '' x, m .*n,, a . � ��., ■w+ Y'", a ,�," , . '��*, w �ioq��'a`w'`.'�' a.,, "�• ., " *N" a- - "" , "�� aJw�w '°. i " l�" °•.w" .p,, p�..., �� °awrwd , -...,.,- .,.,- ,a..'..'.�■'*i�..a.. ', .M■'�:aa ■ 1'°. "��. ., . ,'"':,.-. .,p','•^7w-,�m!'Y'h�-. ", ..., ., ", " " �.wA, .,1 d '�I «M„ s Ww.". . .n .,., , ", '",o , , w �' 2.000 2 spaces per single-family dwelling snit plus one space per accessory dwelling o unit or room rented out in each dwelling unit (see Accessory Uses, Section 15-150).). average of ].5■*5 space per each multifamily dwelling unit. A Minimum of one off-street space shall be provided,for each dwelling unit. On - street parking and space provided ' enclosed or partially enclose'garages may be counted lowardfuYUlnient of parAing requirements beyond the off-stet ■# . minimum. space per 400 square feet of gross floor area.used for commercial purposes in he "'storefront use area Shared parking shallbe allowed and shall be tested as follows: the sum of the parking places for any two uses divided by the ratios below to yield the sharedparking required, .1 Residential and Lodging: 1. Residential and Civic Use or Church Use. 1.1 Residential and Office Use: 1. Raidential and Retail: 1.2 Lodging and Civic Use or Church Use: 1.3 Draft Ordinance Relating to VMTJ and O A Developments Page 5 a m, wr-- ,.µ•n n. -. N M M ",`. w ,. ' , �, fi,y� �' ^w �,:� n� a'".". �M '��r ��"' '""VN w '.x �` , i °""� 'r�n^,v a�' .�« "�-''"', W�,!MC..� "y, i "',n""� ',y,^"'�" ", i I �� "•"y�, "� "�a"C ."1',`'>ww �n ^'M,`ti� ., .L". ., Lodging and ice 1.7 Lolling and Retail:Civic Use or Church Use and Office Use. 1. Civic Use or Church Use and Retail use: 1.3 .Office Use and Retail.Use f 1,2 Altefftative Section 18. Section 15476.2 f) e) is amended by the addition of a new subsection that rem as follows: " The permit-,issuin authont'may-allow shared use of ping. p New Section need to renumber the cinder), Section 5-176.2 0 s wnended by the addition of a new subsection that reads as follows: 0 (e) Yhe rm su � �� -s parting spaces along the front prep" line (except where there are dr cuts �� counted to the minimum number opaking spaces reuie' or the use on that lot. 19.' Axtiele XIV s amended by the addition of a new section 15-,220.1 Design Standards for Village Mixed Use Developments that reads as follows: (a) P"Wage mixed wie developments may be designed in accontance with the u worth Carolina Department of Transportation Traditional Neighborhood . o �� Gu e es. Ault x"0004 Where e Yzc NCDOT D design guidelines have been established, these#Awdl may supercde any related street day�� contained in finance, as well as� � �sandal and g e n�for utilities, d considerations. In the absence fTN specific design guidelines, '�� xt' anda ; ai , guidelines or policies still be applied. (b) For es of umnplementing the NCDOT TXD Guidelines, a village nixed use developmentshall be deemed to be classic Y7V . Article Section 20. i - agile of Pe=issible ' ses amended by remising the nn t requirements associated w � use classifications 2 2.120, .21 2.220, and x".2 30 y mss a" W"under the coin for the O A (Office/Assembly) z � s c raft Or m a Relating to VMU and Development Page 6 Section 2 1. Article IX, Sections -13 6 (10) Office Assembly and 15,,13 are amended y. the addition of new subsections that read as follows: (e) Not more than 25 percent of the total building gross floor constructed within the proposed district may be used for uses permissible within the distfict that fall within the 2.000 classification. . 1. Not more than 25 percent of the total building gr ,floo ,constructed within the proposed district may,be tuedfor uses perm tess b e within ha district ha f within the 2.000 classification Section 22. ice XI Subsection 15-176.2 f) 5 is amended by replacing the "Accessory dwelling unie' and "`ADS' with "'Accra ry Detached Dwelling" 4 j0M )$ tough . Section 23. Article M, Subsection IS-176.2 f)(SXg) (3) is amended..to read as follows: 3, The gross floor area M the ADD shall not exceed 750 square feet. Sector 24. All provisions of any town ordinance M conflict with this ordinance am repcaledw Section 2 . This orainance shall become effective upon adoption. e `orego* ordinance, i submitted t vote, Div the following vote and was duly adopted this day of 2002 Aye. Noes: Absent or excused.- Draft Ordinance Relating to VMU and OA Developments Page 044 ' p d a d Y THIS PAGE RAS BEEN LEIFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY' r 045 ATFAMEN LAND USE ORDINANCE TEXT AMENDMENT A G TO VILLAGE -USE AND OFFCE' A'SE Y DEVELOPMENTS This was i egg to receive comments on proposed changes to the Land Use Ordinance relating to Village infixed.-Use and office/assembly developments. The administration recommended that the Board of Alden adopt the proposed ordinance Patricia Mc r , the tow's Planning Administrator, made the presentation. Vi es, B un en expressed concern about changing the ordinance before hang a proi ec . He staff that hang the context of a specific design and Its relationship to the surroundings wood be helper understanding these amendments. Shirley Marshall spoke m support of the i neighborhood developer ord ce, She requested that the Town research the best mace for elderly mobility, i.e., wheel chairs, etc. then mandate that surface for all areas. Brian "Voice, a resident ern Transition Area and HOTZ meter, spoke against the amendments. He made the following suggestions: mum dice in village for village connector roads- feet Minimum distance from floodplain— 1,200 feet Include limit on overall Village dimity and C and place M� application Include impact fees to reduce tues Lit trawitional buffer 'ass SAPFO mn*th teeth Ellen Pwy requested that a requirement for an intercom systern be built into the ordinance. Julie Andresen, a Chapel ill resident, expressed concern about the amount of unpamou,s suac . Bob Chapman, a developer, invite the Board and residents to look at Testy Heights n Durham. Jay Bryan, chair ofNorthern ition Advisory Board, requested that staff revise the numbering of the advisory board recommendations. He reviewed some of the advisory board"s recommendations. David Markowitz, a.resident of the Northem Transition area, stated he is concerned about not fully understanding what the text amendments Will mom. The Board continued this public hung until May 28 2002 in order to allow the m g Board to complete its review of the proposed amen ea, Canro Board of Aldermn Page 5 May 1F 2002 P , 046 P d � Y TM,S PAGE HAS BEEN LIEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY ^ n P P � P P e d 8 P ATTACHMENT C 047 TOWN OF CARRBORO PLANNING BOARD 301 West Main Street Carrfioro, North Carolina 27514 RECOM M E N PATIO N WY 167 aaoz LVO Text Amendment: Village Mixed--Use and Office/Assembly Developments MOTION WAS MADE BY ANDE WEST AND SECONDED BY ROB HOGAN THAT THE PLANNING BOARD RECOMA+IENDS THAT THE BOARD OF ALDERMEN ADOPT"AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE LAND USE ORDINANCE PROVISIONS RELATING TO VILLAGE MIXED-USE AND QFFICE/ASSEMBLY DEVELOPMENTS"AS NOTED BELOW: SECTION I DEFINES RLPBRENCES CONTAINED IN ORDINANCE SUPPORT sEcTioN 2,3,4 nxr CHANGES OPPOSE S8G710N 5 DEFiNEs AccEssoRY DETACHED DwEErrnvG SUPPORT SECTION 6 LIMiTATiON ON SQUARE FOOTAGE SUPPORT SECTION 7 DEFINES DENSITY REQUIREMENTS ON DETACHED UwELuNG SUPPORT SECTION$ INCREASE BUILDING HBIGHTs SUPPORT SECTION 9 MAXIIIR[TM HEIGHT REGULA'T'IONS SUPPORT SECTIQN 10 BRICK BORDERS AND SIDEWALKS OPPOSE SECTION 11 PUBLIC BENCH INTERVALS SUPPORT STAFF RECOMMENDATION SECIYON 12 BRICK FACADE(SUBJECT TO APFROYAI.BY APPEARANCE COMM.) 50%/SO% SECTION 13 MINIMUM LOT WIDTH ST.TPPOIZT .. . SECTION 14 IMPERVIOUS SURFACE AREA CHANGES SUPPORT STAFF IiEGOMMENDA'fION SECTION 15 FIItE STAIR AND PARKING FOR ADU SUPPORT SECTION 16 STREET FLEE PLACEMENT SUPPORT SECTION 17 VERNAC[JI.AR ARCHITECTURAL STANDARDS SUPPORT SECTION 18 PARKING REQUIltEMENTS SUPPORT STAFF RECOMIVMNDATtON SECTION 19 NCDOT TND STArrnaRDs SUPPORT STAFF RECOMMENDATION SECTION ZO PERCENT RETAII.IN O/A SUPPORT STAFF RECOMMENDATION SECTION 21 LIMIT O/A RETAIL TO 25 PERCENT SUPPORT STAFF RECOMMENDATION' SECTION 22 66ADL7"T4"ADD" SUPPORT SFCI'ION 23 QLARwy 750 SQUARE FOOT LIMIT IN VMLT SUPPORT VOTE: AYES (5) (Babies, Haven-O'Donnell,Hogan, Seazing, West); NOES (0);ABSENT/EXCUSED (Marshall, Poulton; Treat). Ada*v.Searir%W Ghckr (datp/) ATTC19MXN C 2 048 TRANSPORTATION ADVISORY BOARD p RECOMMENDATION April 18, 2002 SUBJECT: Proposed Land Use mane Text Amendments for the Vag xed Use District * Boar recommend� the Board of MOTION: The Transportation + Alden=n approvt Sections 2, 3, and 4 as written, MOTION: Mar SE C OND: Hay VOTE: Ayes Al Noes (None). X Transportation Board recommend, the Board of MOON. The T rtati � u Aldermcn approve Section 10 as writtcn,,, Noes (None). MOTION: Hay SECOND! '� y MOTION@ The Transpottation Advisory Board (T' rcconu=d that the Bow of Aldennen am Section t 1, as ttm MOTION, Marshall SECOND: Hay VOTE! Ayes (All), Noes (None). VOTE: Ayes (AU); Not$ (None)* MOTION: The Tmnsportation AAvisory Board recommerd,that Bow of Alden 'pre Section',,15 as written,, ' MOTION: Mrsba SECOND: VOTE: Ayes (All);Noes ne Board,The' � motion Advisor' Board UABI me � y , f men approve Section �ttm With the additional recommendation diat the word "ma ." chance t "Will a the entcac : ""On-street arldng space provided w enclosed or partially enclosed prages may counted toward -fulfillmcnt of parking reurernts beyond the off-street rnmtn . MOTION: Hay SECS • Marshall VOTE: Ayes (All); Nees (None). MOTION: The Transporiation Advisory Roam A13 commend that the Board of Aldermen rove'Sec 9 as p ttert, b 4 With reference to the Las t paragraph of the x NC OT Traditional Neighborhood DevelWmcrtt CM) Guidelines (page w cation whether the Cuero ordinance. r NCT guidcli=s would take peeace. IV OT ON-0 usha l SEGO RaY VOTE AYes �� (Non� � /02 DATE A TAB Vice--Ch'a'ir u. 049 ATTACuMENT 03 Town of Carrboro C,arrboro Appearance Commiss'lon Caro,, North Carofina 2751 TEVURSDAY,NIAY 2v 2002 PROPOSED TES AMXNDMNTS TO THE LAND USE ORDDIANCE FOR GLACE MILD TJSIE PROJECTS AND OFFICE/ASSIEMLY DISTRICTS R The Appcarance CoraMission has exarru'ried the above-referenced proposal by Wuiunore Land Management, LLC, in s of its philosophical and,practical implications. Our recommendation reflect much careful discussion: We support alto one Accessory Dwelling Unit(ADU) per lot,not to exceed 750 head square feet per staff recolnuncrtdation, We support the increased density allowance reconirrie /2 unit per A comes 'th U's. We support allowing building heights up to 49 feet in VMU and Officc"Ass m ly districts, potentially accommodating 3.5 stories. We do not rec rm= any the odw proposed text cages e�� to s be ��w ��+ * to the Land Use Ordnance s time. The e C a n did not consider die proposed text amendments for the Office/Assembly district to be Within its pmviewl The Appearance C rnrnission voted unanimously ors each of the above points, and wishes make sing statement with this last one: By agreeing to consider any number,of changes 'to the LUO at the behest of one deems the Town sets a dangerous precede — treg develop like customers and the LUO like a product for sale. The Appearance Caro thinks this looks bad. VOTING: AYES: 5 (Chink Morton, Wendy Wank Gagne Devine, Leslie Rountree, and Doug Koh) NOES: Members Present 5 Chuck Morton, Wendy Wk Les' llie Round , Doug Koh, and Cathie Devine Members Absent or Excused 2 . Ruben Hayes and Richard Taylor it h zq � 4jr-am; i:r;- " Appearance nuiaissn Chair Date ABA 0 TTA04 N 4C TOWN CARRSORO ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORY B 0, p � SIP ^ •w i Meeting on May 2,, 2002 at the Carrhoro Town HaU Carr , NorLh Carolina RE COMM AV iLgO MiXed Use Text Amendments W I. Motion was made by Kt Burwell, and seconded by John Gallagher that the Environmental Advisory Board recommend denial of proposed text amendment sections numbered , 3R and 4 to the Village M*xed Use Vii . � - �� - romn STAIN - Gala er VOTE*" AYES (3-Burwell , aENT Matthews). H. Motion was made by Keith Burwell, and seconded by Scott Pohlman, that the recommends Environmental Advisory Board approval of Administration's provisional ions for ado � the proposed text r� m n ear n s m r and 6 (as numbered on the staff summary dated April 25, 2002) to the Village Mixed Use Ordinance* F Specifically, with number 14 - change to impervious surface the Environmental A *sry Board emends that the limit remain at 50 percent with provision for increase if linked , #* to demonstrable, �.commensurate redaction n srmwr runoff volume th n-s - infiltration or offer approved controls. The Environ'mental Advisory Board further supports the Administration recommendation to include a requirement for recycling stations i manc on with trash cans n the storefront andfownhouse use areas,, The Environmental A i � d chose not to comment n any remaining proposed text, amendments. Gallagher.VOTEN AMES (5) ( Beown Pohlman, Burwell. Gore); NOES , ABSENT/ CUSS 1 (Mathews). qLyni4v M. Qom, Status of Requested Amendments— Development n Village Mired-Use and O A Districts. , M!X 20G2 Requested Amendment Response to Request Draft Staff Comment(Recommendation) LUO Section 15-176.2: Ordinance language drafted that Amendments would allow the Board of Alden to Change to a so that it is speclified that the allows Boards decision on Master approve projects whose delopt standards did approved Master Plan may include ire or Phin to include moire or less 2 3 not specifically meet all the provisions spelled out in less sect standards/provisions for the VMU restrictive regulations/development the Land Use Ordinance. (Adopt wised text) design sections for B-3-T and 01A uses. � standards than those otlierwis Change to (b) its M above,porta ining to R- spaded for VMU+developments- f 0 uses. 2 Section -15 (92) Ordinance language drafted that Amendments seduce the size of accesses omits in Addition of a second example of Residence, cre rtes new accessory dwelling VMU developments. 7be amendments would also Prirnary with Accessory Apartment-a (ADD) definitiM wfth a lit of 750 5, 6 allow accessory detached dwellings on lots detached ADU that may be located over a square feet. Additional provision t1V`0Ugh0Ut tOWn where accessory apartments are garage and include up t 900 square feet of included to make it clear that duty currently allowed. .4p# eAted space. for ADD units outside of VMU&is calculated 'the same manner as that used:for prinwy residences with accessory garimpts. Section 1S-176.2- Or4miance language drafted that Accesses dwelhngs are permitted in the residential Change to specify that ADUs do not count provides Board of Aldermen with two use areas of a VMU. A village development plan towards the density allocation for a property. alternatives. First alternative allows 7 currently under view proposes a development accessory units In.addition to total dimity of approxinstely four nests per ate.If all number of pennissible dwelling its. single-family tots included an accessory dwelling Second afternative allows mite to be the density would increase to3PPTGX1M2telY 5 units .. counted as a half dwelling um'L per acre if count as a half unt"4 approxtirmtely its per acre if counted as a whole Wit. (Adopt E Section 15-176.2: Ornance language drafted to (Adopt) Change to block design requirentents in so increase the building height in tharbuildings up to . stories are permitted sees)hom 2,5 to 3.5 and to add and that the build-up lire for tie buildings twe st ry build-up he o b twen can range from 30-35 feet above average 30 and 35 feet. ground level, Section 15-176.2: Ordirmnce language drafted to Use Ordiiiance provisions for downtown Changes storefront and townhouse use area increase buikhng height in feet and districts, which may be seen as omparab1 to the design components n that the rmximum stories in the storefront and 9 downtown B-1 (c)and B-I(G)districts where up to vertical design is 3.5 stories and 49 feet. towrdmuse use areas from 2.5 sties 4 et and three ages.are permitted. Builds and 35 feet rmximunu. may include s well Yd apt) 6 Chan to storefront and townhouse use Ounce tan a drafted- A sidewalk with brick borders is ffic standard that Ewa tvs a a Requested Amendment 'Response to Request Drab Staff Comment(Recomm endadon) U design area components so that Sidewalks and request - 10 has been used in the downtown.-The change wu_Id walkways may be brick or concrete. Brick - continue to requineither Crete or brick borders would n longer b sidewalks. Brick burden would not be prohibited, but would-not be reT�yed- (A�pq i 69 The cent spacing of public bens along E. 7 Section 15-176.2-1 Weaver smet in-downtown Carib=14S Change to(f)so&at the spacing requirement & for public benchas is 200 feet other than 50 apprmumtely 400 feet. mange would allow mater flexibility, in dct � -tie spacing. (Adopt revised feet. text) g of property and project design. Pardcular features Section 15-176.2-., 12 W nt com aeon f flexibility ftm the cent mange t (I)- , t the exterior nuterils r firemen s -c*fird a y a least one � � �. A do pt) al of all the buildings sounding the particular f 9 Section 15-176.2-b warrant consideration of flexibility fiom The Current change f)that alines deviation from the prescribed in�um i widths,yard 13 rovui ons . (Adopt) qu n and separation req iremmut so long as the Board of Alen has also �pproved the as an Al 10- Section 15-176.2: Ordinance provisionbas been draftrd hnpervious surface allocations do provide a h maximum �t allows a location.of the total additional= o ging tGnwar quanta , coverage �� impervious c to residence use and quality y limiting developed area do impervious my area lots usin ern-dt review an st rtnwater infiltrationtgroundwater charge n final at preparation. occur. (Leave impervious space imitation _ s punt. Adopt explanatory text aMrwingoddifional impervious surface area so long as there is no increase ion the volume ofrmwaer discharge On !t,Un the shann oJILm2Lrvious su ace Ordinance I I Section IS-176.2:- r No change� �� LS Coved n Sections ,6 Change to(f)to specify(hat the 150 percent request. reuirements for accessory dwellIng its do not apply. &I 41L 12 Section 15-176.2: particular features of property and project desip Change to(f) so that located on a side other than the rear of a E a (Adopt) flexibility ftoni the current provisions gara c!ADU(since garages will face the 15 alley). Cha!!Lc tospecify flat of streci parking for Status 0fVMU and 01A —Requested Amendments/Recommendations Page 2 May 2, 2002 Requested Amendment Response to Request Draft Staff Comment(Recommendation) LUO # A s shall be located to the side or rear. Screem'ng is not racessag. 13 Section IS-176.2: Change cla:rifies street tree provlslow consistent with Change to street tree placement requirements. 16 requirement specified in Section 15-176.2 (r (1)reg et tree la men Vdopf) - 14 Section 15-177: Amendments would allow greater diversity/choice of Mange to(a) to reduce applicability of VAS architectural elements, some of which are.not as - to 50 percent of dwelling units, to revise the 17 ate for a.11 housing types, Greater percentage roof pit 6h.siding rev at, and chimney of dwellins Urfits meeting the standards Wight result placenwat and garage door provisions. in a more uniforms less architecturally interesting deyqo2 men t- &dopO 15 Section 15-291: (Adopt revised text) Change to miclude a park!-ng requirement for VMU developments and to more efficiently manage parking in a VMU. all 4t 16. Section 15-220: Adds a new section.that specifies that VMU 19 See attachment D I for comparison of current Town developments may use NCDOT TWD and NCDOT standards. (Adopt revised text) standards 17 Section 1 5-146 Adds retatil uses to those perMlitted in 20 Addition of luifnited retail uses would provide O/A developments cffomtnity for employees or nearby residents of O/A developimuts to obtain basic retail goods. L,4 19 Section IS-136(10)* L"' nifts, perp*W retail uses to no Twenty-five percent cap selected so that retail use more than 25 percent of the 21 could not dominate an O development. (Adopt) developed gross square -footage of any deve1 2pment 19 Section IS-176.2 (f)(5) Replaces the tenn "Accessory 22, 23 Change made for purposes of consistency. (Adopt) Dwelling Unit (ADqss with AccessoTy Detached Dwelling (ADD) and r laczs 900 with 750 s pare feet Staff-gnated. Status of VMU and OA — Requested Amendments/Recommendations Page 3 May 2, 2002 054 p TMS,PAGE HAS.BEEF LEFT BLANK ENTENTTONALLY Excerpt from Carrboro Board of Aldermen Mire es May 28, 2002 055 Section 1. The mayor and Board Aldermen hereby appoint Gordon Cook to a seat on the Recreation and 'arks Commission. Mr. Cook's term shall expire in February 2005. Section 2. This resolution shall become effective upon adopfion. The foregoing resolution having been submitted to a vote, receive, the following vote and was duly adopted this 28th day of ay 2002: Ayes: Joal Hall Broun, Herb Dorosin, Jacquelyn G st John Herrera, Diana McDuffee, Michael Nelson, Alex Zafrn Noes: None Absent or Excused: Nome PRESENTATION OF THE 2002- 3 HUMAN SERVICES BUDGET RECOMMENDATIONS The purpose of Chi's Item was to present to the Board, of Aldermen the recommendations from the, Human. Se ces. Commission for fun in requests from. the nonprofit ��n�i�� r ► ��dl services to Carrboro citizens. Lille Atwater, Chair of the Human Sery ces Commission., presented the report. Alderman Domain requested that the town staff prow do "'information on why the Human Services Commission had. recommended .� for Drama Community and Schools, Inc. � �� iven to the Town of Carrhr . CONTINUATION OF THE PUBLIC HEARING: LAND USE ORDINANCE TEXT REND N RELATING TO VILLAGE MIXED-USE AND OFFICE/ASSEMBLY DEVELOPMENTS the Board of Aldermen held a public healing on May 7, 2002 to receive comments on 'r " osed changes to the Land Use Ordinance related Village Mixed-Use and Office/Assembly developments. The Board continued this public hearing until May 28, 2002 in order to allow the Planning Board to complete its review of the proposed amendment. The Administration recommended that the Board of Aldermen adopt the proposed ordinance, with noted motiffi cations. Bob Chapman thanked the Board and advisor boards for the time spent on these proposed amendments. He said that many positive ideas were obtained from the Planning Board. James Carnahan spoke 'in favor of the proposed ordinance. He said that giving the Board greater discretion reviewing a V 'U proposal is that this increased flexibility will allow. the Board to respond more effectively w the details f a part ►cider proposal. retail inclusion in office assembly will allow greater vane of sti.nations within walking distance of residents. Urged the Board to adopt the option not to count units at all in determining density. " accessory certain that proposed, retention and management practices will ►ntin t h effective over time. e proposed architectural and landscape cape design guideline changes would allow greater flexibility and thus the possibility of greater variety. In addition, he supports red cin parking minimums encouraging shared parking. Carrboro Board of Aldermen Page 4 May 2,8, 2002 Nay Salmon, a resident of the northern Transition are, had questions about the mpery ous surace percentage and expressed concern about runof f impervious surface 'is increased. She asked that the impervious space provisions should not changed. She also suggested that the accessory w 1 � r a n n � . fian Boyce, a resident of the norther transition area, asked If the proposed amendment was seat to Orange County. Mr. Boyce asked that the Board delay actim on this matter until the residents of the northern transition area can have a public hung on this matter with the Orange County Board of C mnn*ssioners. Mr. Boyce noted to Appearance Commission's statement that agreeing to consider changes to the land use ordinance the request of one developer is not a good de . Chris Potter, a resident o northers transition area, stated that the W1nm ro development is the first project to come under the provisions of the Small, Area Plan and the suggestions made by the developer for changes are reasonable changes. MOTION WAS A E BY JOHN HERRER.A AND SECONDED BY ALEX ZAFFRON TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING, VOTE: AFFIRMATIVE AL MOTION WAS MADE BY MARK DOROSIN AND SECONDED BY JOHN HERRERA TO APPROVE SECTIONS 2, 3 AND OF THE ORDINANCE. VOTE: AFFIRMATIVE TWO, NEGATIVE FIVE (ZAFFRON, BROUNI NELSON, MCDUMEE, GIST) MOTION WAS MADE BY ALEX' Z FFRON AND SECONDED BY, MARK DOROSIN TO AFFRONT ALTERNATIVE #1 OF SECTION 7. VOTE: AFFIRMATIVE SIX, NEGATIVE ONE (GIST) MOTION WAS MADE 13Y ALEX ZAFFRON AND SECONDED BY JACQUELYN GIST TO NOT APPROVE SECTION 10. VOTE: AFFIRMATIVE FOUR, NEGATIVE THREE (MCDUFFEE, DO OSIN HERRERA MOTION WAS MADE BY JACQUELYN GIST AND SECONDED BY ALEX ZAFFRON TO APPROVE THE FOLLOWING LANGUAGE FOR SECTION I2 "MATERIALS IN THE EXTERIOR OF 13UILDINGS SURROUNDING THE GREENS SHALL BE LIMITED TO A DIVERSITY OF BRICK, WOOD, STUCCO, MASONRY, AND OTHER SIDING MATERIALS ARE SU13JECT TO THE REVIEW OF THE APPEARANCE- COMMISSION AND THE PERMIT,ISSUING AUTHORITY.111 VOTE: AFFIRMATIVE p ALL MOTION S MADE BY MARK DOROSIN AND SECONDED BY ALEX ZAFFRON THAT SECTION 14 BE AMENDS READ: '-f- E TOTAL IMPERVIOUS COVERAGE SHALL BE 50 PERCENT FOR ALL,OF THE LOTS IN THIS USE AREA. ALLOCATION TO EACH LOT SHALL BE INDICATED O THE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DEANS AND MUST BE FINALIZED AT THE TIME A FINAL PLAT IS RECORDED, FOR MULTI-PHASE PROJECT'S' THE FINAL I LOCATI N SMALL E BY PHASE. NO FURTHER REALLOCATION OF IMPERVIOUS SURFACE COVERAGE FOR LOTS IN THIS USE AREA SHALL BE ALLOWED AFTER THE FINAL PLAT HAS BEEN CORDED."' AFFIRMATIVE ALL The Board agreed to approve Sections 1, , 6, 8, 9, 11, 13, 1 5,1 6 1 1 79 189 199 207 21, 22, 23 as recommended by the town staff. MOTION WAS MADE 13Y ALEX ZAFFRON AND SECONDED BY JOAL HALL BROUN TO ADOPT HE ORDINANCE ENTITLE -) "" N ORDINANCE INANC ENDING THE LAND USE ORDINANCE PROVISIONS RELATING TO VILLAGE AND OFFICE/ASSEMBLY DEVELOP ENTS, SUBJECT TO THE ABOVE REVISIONS. VOTE: AFFIRMATIVE ALL Carrboro Boar.of Aldermen Fags 5 May 28, 2002