Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutORD-2011-038 Unified Development Ordinance Text Amendment – Section 2.5.3 Site Plan Specificationsao~,-,o -~~ ,-~ Ordinance #: 2~11-~3C~ AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE OF ORANGE COUNTY WHEREAS, there is a need to review and, as necessary, revise existing land use regulations over time, and WHEREAS, the Orange County Planning Director is authorized to initiate text amendments, and WHEREAS, there is a concern over the lack of specific language requiring projects needing site plan review to comply with adopted access management plans, and WHEREAS, the amendment is necessary to ensure compliance with adopted plans as well as encouraging and promoting acceptable traffic circulation patterns and connectivity, and WHEREAS, the County has held the required public hearing and has found the proposed text amendment is consistent with the adopted Comprehensive Plan. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Commissioners of Orange County that the Unified Development Ordinance (UDO) of Orange County is hereby amended as follows: RED = Proposed Te~ c~"~e~~# = Deleted Text Section 1. Section 2.5.3 Plan Specifications be amended as follows: (T) Methods of disposal of trees, limbs, stumps and construction debris associated with the permitted activity. Open burning of trees, limbs, stumps, and/or construction debris associated with the permitted activity is expressly prohibited; ~ jU) Compliance with County adopted access manaaement, transportation, or connectivitv plans and denote the location of future roadwav(s) and access easements whether qublic or private, to ensure and encouraqe future connectivity; and {~}~ Additional information may be required based on the site location and the type of development proposed. Section 2. That this ordinance be placed in the book of published ordinances. Section 3. This ordinance is effective upon its adoption. Upon motion of ommissioner r~(~ i , seconded by Commissioner _ , the foregoing ordinance was adopted this ~~ day of ~~ , 2011. I, Donna S. Baker, Clerk to the Board of Commissioners for Orange County, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing is a true copy of so much of the proceedings of said Board at a meeting held on , 2011 as relates in any way to the adoption of the foregoing and that said proceedings are recorded in the minutes of the said Board. WITNESS my hand and the seal of said County, this ~ day of ~~ , 2011. e ~ ~o "'~``4~~ ~/,~4 h ~*aro~~ Clerk to the Boa f ommissioners o~lJ - oZd // ~ 0~.3 ~ ~D-/~- / l ~~ d. Unified Develonment Ordinance Text Amendment - Article 10 (Definitions) The Board received the Planning Board recommendation, closed the public hearing and considered a decision on a Planning Director initiated text amendment to Article 10 of the Unified Development Ordinance regarding the definition of "Commercial-Industrial Transition Activity Node Land." Planner Perdita Holtz said that this is a housecleaning item to revise the definition of "Commercial Industrial Transition Activity Node Land." This is so the definition will be consistent with the same definition in the Comprehensive Plan. The item was heard at the August 22"d Quarterly Public Hearing, and since then the Planning Board has recommended unanimously to approve the amendment. PUBLIC COMMENT None. A motion was made by Commissioner McKee, seconded by Commissioner Hemminger to close the public hearing. VOTE: UNANIMOUS A motion was made by Commissioner Foushee, seconded by Commissioner Hemminger to approve the Ordinance amendment as recommended by the Planning Board detailed within Attachment 5. VOTE: UNANIMOUS e. Unified Development Ordinance Text Amendment - Section 2.5.3 Site Plan Specifications The Board received the Planning Board recommendation, closed the public hearing and considered a decision on a Planning Director initiated Unified Development Ordinance text amendment requiring site plans to demonstrate compliance with County adopted access management and connectivity plans. Michael Harvey said that there were no comments made at the Quarterly Public Hearing on this item. The Planning Board recommended unanimously that the Board of County Commissioners approve this item. He said that the County Attorney will be recommending the addition of a word in Attachment 5. This is Item U of Section 1. The County Attorney has suggested that the paragraph should read, "Compliance with County adopted access management, transportation, and/or connectivity plans and denote the location of future roadway(s) and access easements, whether public or private, to ensure and encourage future connectivity." PUBLIC COMMENT None. A motion was made by Commissioner Hemminger, seconded by Commissioner McKee to close the public hearing. VOTE: UNANIMOUS A motion was made by Commissioner McKee, seconded by Commissioner Hemminger to approve the Ordinance amendment as recommended by the Planning Board detailed within Attachment 5, with the change in wording as suggested by the County Attorney and shown above. VOTE: UNANIMOUS