HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes - 20020903APPROVED 11/19/2442 MINUTES
ORANGE COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
September 3, 2402
The Orange County Board of Commissioners met on September 3, 2002 at 7:30 p.m. at the Southern
Human Services Center in Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENT: Chair Barry Jacobs and Commissioners Margaret W. Brown,
Alice M. Gordon, Stephen Halkiotis and Moses Carey, Jr.
COUNTY ATTORNEY PRESENT: Geoffrey Gledhill and S. Sean Borhanian
COUNTY STAFF PRESENT: County Manager John M. Link, Jr., Assistant County Manager Rod Visser,
Assistant County Manager Gwen Harvey and Clerk to the Board Donna S. Baker (All other staff
members will be identified appropriately below}
NOTE: ALL DOCUMENTS REFERRED TO IN THESE MINUTES ARE IN THE PERMANENT
AGENDA FILE IN THE CLERK'S OFFICE.
1. ADDITIONS OR CHANGES TO THE AGENDA
Item 9-b2 was added - "Report and Action on Growth Controls in Large Residential Projects."
PUBLIC CHARGE
The Board of Commissioners pledges to the citizens of Orange County its respect: The Board asks
its citizens to conduct themselves in a respectful, courteous manner, both with the Board and with
fellow citizens. At any time should any member of the Board or any citizen fail to observe this
public charge, the Chair will ask the offending person to leave the meeting until that individual
regains personal control. Should decorum fail to be restored, the Chair will recess the meeting until
such time that a genuine commitment to this public charge is observed.
2. CITIZEN & AUDIENCE COMMENTS
a. Matters not on the Printed Agenda
There were 13 speakers signed up to speak about the Animal Protection Society, but the
Chair only allowed four people to speak due to the number of items on the printed agenda. The Board of
County Commissioners will be referring this issue to the staff and will direct which forum will be available
to the public to make these matters known.
Margie Huggins distributed a handout to the Board of County Commissioners. She read from
the handout. She lives in Chapel Hill and has adopted an animal from the Orange County Animal
Protection Society. She understands that it is a difficult task to run a shelter and has the utmost respect
for those involved. However, many people in the community have concerns about some of the practices
and oversight at the shelter. She is an attorney and she has spoken to several other lawyers and
citizens who share her concern over the appeals process and the lack of specific written guidelines. It is
critical that guidelines for matters such as adoptions and dangerous dog designations be available both
for public information and to ensure that the APS is consistent in their decision-making. She asked the
Board of County Commissioners in their contract with APS to require the APS to adhere to the open
meetings law. She made reference to a quote from Mrs. Walters in the Durham paper as follows, "The
APS is no more aquasi-governmental agency than a cleaning service is." She said that this is perhaps
misguided. She said that this agency operates as an arm of the County and makes discretionary
decisions for the good of the public and the animals. She said that Mrs. Walters also commented that
the community did not want to see the work of one person bring down the work of many. She said that
no one person is trying to bring down the work of many. To the contrary, many are calling for increased
accountability sa that the goad work can continue to be done. One of her areas of practice is animal law
and she is willing to step forward and commit to helping establish or serve on a task force to address
same of these concerns.
Stacy Hughes represents the APS and Wildlife Center and said that she is proud to be a part
of the APS. She does have concerns about internal issues -disease control, lack of medical support for
wildlife, a blatant disregard far federal regulations that places staff at risk in jeopardizing their careers in
their field, and misrepresentation of the low cost spayJneuter clinic. There is more detail on these issues
in the packets provided to the Board. They do not want to bash the APS, but they are hoping to
encourage positive change. They are employees but want to make these matters known to the Board of
County Commissioners.
Kris Bergstrand, a veterinarian for 22 years, said that she began volunteering at APS Wildlife
Rehab Center and SpayJNeuter Clinic in October 2001. When she began volunteering, she told the
veterinarian on staff that she did not hold a license in the state of North Carolina. He called the North
Carolina Veterinary Board who assured her that it was appropriate for her to work on the non-public
owned animals. She asked the Orange County Board of Commissioners to convene a public forum to
help clarify to the citizens of Orange County haw APS policy decisions are made and how these policies
affect animals, the public, and the APS staff. She is particularly concerned about the recent history of
the APS program offering low cost spays and neuters to the public. She has documentation showing
that APS management and Board of Directors have strongly encouraged the veterinary staff to perform
this service, even after they were made aware that performing this service is in violation of the Veterinary
Practice Act of North Carolina. She is very frustrated at the lack of clear policies at the APS regarding
the adoption of sick or potentially dangerous animals. She is also worried about concerns brought to her
by APS staff over the past two months about veterinary care and disease control. She understands that
the staff took the concerns to the management, but did not receive a response that could help correct the
problems. She contacted a board member and described the concerns. The board member seemed
appreciative and assured her that this would be addressed. As of today, the staff has not received any
guidance. She hopes that a task force made up of veterinarians from the community can assist APS in
being the best it can be. She said that tomorrow she could provide copies of a statement from a foster
dog volunteer who had an experience with a pit bull. The pit bull showed aggression towards people and
animals. She was advised by APS's awn trainer that the dog be put to sleep. The dog was still adopted
out at advice of the management of APS.
Judith Reitman said that she attempted to adopt a puppy, Casey, but the dog was euthanized
after being deemed aggressive by the APS. A director of a County agency told her in a documented
conversation, "Even if you write an investigative article, it want do any good." She felt compelled as a
public interest journalist to pursue documentation of these matters. She found that there is a significant
discrepancy between what APS tells the public it does and what it actually does. She also found a
discrepancy between its official mandate and its internal policies. Furthermore, the agency responsible
for the oversight of APS has assumed an inappropriate advocacy role for the organizations. Orange
County taxpayers pay about $428,000 a year of APS's shelter bills, yet APS is contemptuous of public
inquiry. All of her findings could justify a fraud inquiry. She said that the board maintains ahands-off
policy, refusing to question management's decision. She said that the Director of the Board of Health
has assumed an advocacy role, both in writing and in the media, in defending APS against critics who
simply wish to see APS fulfill its public mandate of protecting animals and the community. She is
requesting the Board of County Commissioners to assume its rightful authority and call a public forum.
The purpose is to create a public oversight body comprised of professionals in the field of veterinary
medicine, law, and the media. The intent is to clean house at APS in order to initiate and secure
enforcement of responsible and legal practices. This should include an amendment to the County
contract that places APS under the public records and open meetings law. There is no justification for
APS to conduct closed-daordeeision-making when the public is paying 213 of its bill.
Chair Jacobs asked Greg Wilder from the Manager's staff to get a-mail names/addresses for
future correspondence with the people who were signed up to speak about APS. The Board will refer
this to staff to bring back a report to the Board of County Commissioners. One of the Assistant
Managers, Gwen Harvey, will get together with Health Director Rosemary Summers and Alan Reimer
who is on the Animal Control and Environmental Health subcommittee on the Board of Health to create a
process so that there is an opportunity to document and discuss the issues that people have and to
suggest an appropriate forum for discussing that beyond the Board of Health if needed. A task force
may also be needed. Anew animal shelter is supposed to be online by 2006 and this is a good impetus
to get started.
Commissioner Halkiotis asked the County Attorney to include in the report, because of the
significant contribution by Orange County to the APS, that there is an obligation to meet the mandates of
the North Carolina open meetings law. He asked for clarification from Mrs. Reitman on the information
from the director of a County agency. He asked if she was saying that one of our directors of one of our
departments told this to her. She said yes. Commissioner Halkiotis said that he is very concerned
because he has been inundated with emails about this. He would like for the inquiry to be as complete
and as quick as possible.
Commissioner Brown would like the APS to explain the relationship between the Lantane
Center and if it is funded with any County monies.
Commissioner Gordon is grateful that the citizens have brought this to our attention and said
that we are all animal lovers.
Commissioner Carey would like the staff to bring back feedback as soon as possible even if it
is interim feedback. He asked for a shave of hands of any APS board members. There were about six
people.
John Link said that the first step is to sit down with the leadership of the Board of Health and
define what the State law requires in county government as it relates to animal control and what the
State does not require of counties with animal control. Orange County has had a rich history and
relationship with the APS. We may want to look at all alternatives for animal control in other counties to
see what is successful. He said that they are going to start immediately on this issue and come back
with a game plan for working with the Board of Health and the citizens to produce a positive outcome.
Chair Jacobs said that there would be an interim update no later than October 1St
Judith Reitman said that there are sick animals at the shelter and increasing numbers of dying
animals. Chair Jacobs said that this would be included in the charge to ask the staff to visit the APS to
make sure there is not an immediate problem that needs to be addressed from a health point of view.
George Tate, Jr. said that he was born in Efland, NC. He said that he came to the Board two
months ago and was told to go to the Planning Department to get a permit for the 7-11 in Efland. He
went before the Planning Department, but they denied him the permit. He is coming to the Board to try
and get this piece of property zoned to build this. He has a water and sewage tap now. In doing so, the
federal government filed a tax lien on his property and he had to stop the construction until he cleared
out the tax lien. He has lost about two years trying to get this permit. The piece of property is on the
corner of Richmond Road and US 70 and is approximately 1.85 acres. It is now zoned R-1 and the
Planning Department said that he would need an R-2 zoning. He has over 100 signatures {petition
included) from neighbors that want this 7-11. He said that it was not his idea to build the 7-11, but the
neighbors wanted him to build it. He also has two other pieces of property -the old JOCCA building and
a nine-acre tract that is zoned R-1. He wants the JOCCA building to be zoned commercial and he wants
the nine-acre tract to be zoned far affordable housing. He asked for the Board of County
Commissioners' cooperation.
Chair Jacobs said that this would be referred to the planning staff and Mr. Tate would be
informed when it comes back to the Board of County Commissioners.
Commissioner Halkiotis was unclear because it sounded like at one time that he did have a
building permit. Chair Jacobs said that apparently there has been a lapse of a number of years between
the time he got the permit and now. Commissioner Halkiotis verified with Mr. Tate that there was a
footings inspection and that water and sewer fees have been paid.
Commissioner Brawn asked staff to do an outline of the steps involved in re-zoning for Mr.
Tote's properties.
Chair Jacobs asked the Manager to return with information on this issue by October 1, 2002.
b. Matters an the Printed Agenda {These matters were considered as the Board addressed
the items an the agenda below.)
3. BOARD COMMENTS
Commissioner Halkiotis asked County Engineer Paul Thames to give an update on the water
situation. Paul Thames said that he did not know exactly how much rain fell in northern Orange County
over the weekend, but the rain added a foot and a half of water to Lake Orange and at Hillsborough's
West Fork reservoir. It may be over 3 weeks before we go into Stage 6 water restrictions. Cane Creek
got only about 3 inches. OWASA still plans to meet with its board this Thursday to talk about asking
Chapel Hill, Carrbaro, and Orange County to approve even mare stringent water use restrictions in the
OWASA service area.
Commissioner Halkiotis said that he had endorsed a while back a letter to DOT District Engineer
Mike Mills about a stoplight at Cedar Ridge High School. We got the stoplight. He said that the County
Planning staff has asked about a cross walk at Grady Brown to Cedar Ridge, but it was denied by DOT.
Today, he witnessed first hand the Cedar Ridge football team running across the street to practice at
Grady Brown because the field is more established. There are two driveways that are aligned with the
two schools and a crosswalk could go in there. He asked the Manager to write to Mike Mills again about
the crosswalk.
Chair Jacobs suggested copying the letter to Division Manager of DOT, Mr. Galyon.
Commissioner Brown asked if anyone was making a list of possible DOT cross walks {one is at
Seawell School Road}.
Commissioner Halkiotis suggested asking both school systems to review the cross walk issues.
John Link said that he would.
Commissioner Halkiotis said that he was around the King junk yard on US 70 and that the cars
seem to be moving closer to the road. He asked that the Zoning Enforcement Officer look into this to
see if the cars are in the right-of-way. He would like the staff to take pictures of this.
Commissioner Gordon said that the Rural Planning Organization was discussed at the Triangle J
Council of Governments meeting. A lot of the questions that she had asked about the RPO were
answered. One of the issues was the name and why it was named Research Triangle. Part of the
reason is because this is the Triangle area. Also, if you take out the two Metropolitan Planning
Organizations and the fact that Johnston County does not want to join the MPO, then everything else
that is left is in the Triangle. They also said that people wanted to be associated with the name Triangle.
It is true that it would have to be approved by everybody else if we wanted to change the name. She
asked about the bylaws and why there was not more specificity, and it was answered that everybody
would have to go back and re-sign. There is every intention that there would be bylaws that would be
made up when the groups get together. The counties that will be involved will only have one town
representative. Orange County would not have a town representative. The other three counties would
have two representatives. The people at the Triangle J COG thought it was a good agreement. She
said that people are interested in having Orange County to participate.
Commissioner Gordon said that there is an election a week from today -September 10, 2002.
There will be no run-off. She said that she got a call that one of the precinct entrances is blocked by
court order. She asked Geof Gledhill to give a brief update. Geof Gledhill said that there is no court
order and the palling place is not blocked. He said that the residents of the Oaks Community challenged
the series of special use permits issued by the Town. In the context of that litigation, an agreement was
reached that resulted in all of the litigation being dismissed. The agreement was that there were two
roads that are planned as part of the final build out of the Meadowmont Community that will not be
offered as dedicated roads to Chapel Hill until July 2003. The reason for the agreement was that the
existing community was concerned that these new roads would make their community a thoroughfare
between Ephesus Church Road and NC 54. They were also concerns about the roads being used for
construction traffic during the build out. Geof Gledhill said the roads are blocked off by flowerpots and
there are other routes to get to polling place. He said that he had been told by Carolyn Thomas that she
would provide maps and letters to all voters in the precinct area telling them how to get to the polling
place.
Commissioner Gordon did not want anyone to be deterred to vote by this road situation.
Commissioner Carey made reference to a resolution concerning the 2002 drought adopted by the
NCACC. The NCACC will probably put together a group of County Commissioners and the League of
Municipalities and if anyone is interested in serving on this group, they should let Commissioner Carey
know. Chair Jacobs said that he might be interested.
Commissioner Brown asked John Link about the Planning Department and the signage ordinance
to see if there were any election signs out of compliance. John Link said that the Zoning Enforcement
Officer went out and took down a lot of them that were out of compliance. He noted that our jurisdiction
is only with the County at large. There are other signs in Chapel Hill ar Hillsboraugh that may be out of
compliance, but that is their zoning responsibility.
Chair Jacobs expressed his appreciation for the rain and said that he walked down to 7-mile Creek
a couple of weeks ago and it was totally dry. He went down yesterday and there were several inches of
water flowing.
Chair Jacobs shared that he went to the opening of the YMCA/Carol Woods Day Care Facility.
There are only six children signed up for the daycare. It adjoins an assisted living facility, which allows
far interaction of preschool kids and senior adults.
Chair Jacobs reported that he and Commissioner Halkiotis met today with the Chairs and one Vice-
Chair of the two school systems, the Manager, and the Superintendents. This is the High School
Planning Task Force. They talked about two things for the September 24t" joint meeting with the two
school boards: 1}the possibility of getting assistance from the Institute of Government to help work on
issues of collaboration between the two Schaal districts; and 2} we asked our staff to do some cast
analysis of some of the different high school sizes that have been discussed using our current
indebtedness and other alternative funding sources.
Chair Jacobs said that the District XV B Bar Association has commissioned a mural for the
courthouse by Chapel Hill artist Michael Brown. It is going to be a gift to the County in celebration of the
250t" anniversary. The painting will reflect the rich heritage of the entire County.
Commissioner Brown made reference to the meeting today with the school boards and asked
about the status of the adequate public facilities ordinance.
Planning Director Craig Benedict said that the School and Land Use Council sent the last version of
the APFO to all local governments. Hillsboraugh had a meeting this summer and Carrboro and Chapel
Hill have some comments and minor revisions. The School Facilities Task Farce has addressed some of
the four variables within the formula to calculate the APFO. After the projection models are tied together,
all of the comments from the local governments and the School Facilities Task Force will be gathered
and sent through one more time to everyone. It will also come to the Board of County Commissioners.
This last version should be ready within about a month.
Commissioner Gordon said that she had just asked Craig Benedict in an email to get together the
update on what the jurisdictions have done on the MOU and on the Schools Adequate Public Facilities
Ordinance. She also asked far a time schedule so they could start collecting the data on November 15t"
and then get the ordinance in place by February 15, 2003. She asked when the Board of County
Commissioners would be able to discuss the MOU. She thinks the Board should get it on the schedule
in late October.
John Link suggested putting it on the work session in the second week in November.
Commissioner Gordon pointed out that the Schools and Land Use Council made recommendations
on all the things that are needed to start the SAPFO. She said that we did not have a lot of time if it is to
be implemented by February 2003. She wants to discuss this an October 11tH
Chair Jacobs said that he would discuss this with the Manager on how soon it could be put on an
agenda. Also, he would like an update on what issues remain for the Orange County School Board.
Commissioner Gordan said that the Chapel Hill-Carrboro City School district, the Chapel Hill Town
Council, and the Carrboro Board of Aldermen seem to have a sense of urgency and these schools are
growing fast as opposed to the Orange County Schools which are not filling up as quickly.
4. COUNTY MANAGER'S REPORT
John Link recognized Fletcher Barber of Cooperative Extension who gave an overview of what the
drought has done to the farmers. He said that there has been 90°lo pasture loss, which has forced
livestock producers to sell their animals earlier at a lighter weight because there was no pasture for them
to graze. The figures are that farmers in the area will lose from $10,000-50,000 because of the drought.
They were pleased to see the rain but it will not help much and if this drought continues, it will hurt the
cows. They have continued to try and educate the farmers through newsletters on the drought situation.
There is some relief for the farmers through the farm service agency as well as the soil and water. This
will give them 75% funds to help them towards watering systems, etc. They are really concerned that
most of the livestock producers are using their winter feed now. They have only had four farmers come
in and ask for assistance with their wells. Another issue from the drought is increased diseases. One
disease in tobacco has been the split worm that is between the leaves.
Commissioner Gordon asked if farmers were going to be forced out of business. Fletcher Barber
said that some farmers are on the edge of going out of business.
Commissioner Gordon asked if the County could do anything. Fletcher Barber said that he was
meeting with the drought committee and they are trying to formulate some recommendations.
Commissioner Gordon said that we have been trying to encourage farmers to keep farming and it
would be too bad if some of them went out of business.
Commissioner Carey asked about the 75% money available and Fletcher Barber said that it is loan
money through the North Carolina Agriculture Cost Share Program and the Environmental Quality
Incentive Program. These are bath administered through the Soil and Water Conservation Service.
Commissioner Brawn asked for any information about how many farmers are using irrigation.
Fletcher Barber said that he would try and provide this to her through his report.
Chair Jacobs told Fletcher Barber to remind farmers who are short on funds that the County does
have funds for purchasing conservation easements, which is a way to capitalize some of the other parts
of their operation.
5. RESOLUTIONS/PROCLAMATIONS
a. Proclamation Celebrating 250th Anniversary of Orange County
The Board considered a proclamation officially designating the year beginning September 9,
2002 as a year of celebration of Orange County's 250th Anniversary.
Economic Development Director Dianne Reid made the presentation and distributed a revised
preliminary budget. There have been some additional contributions. Sheer Associates designed and
laid out a general information brochure. This is a draft. It equates to $1,885. There was a significant
discount on the flagpoles for the banners from Dual Supply. She reminded the Board of the events on
Sunday and Monday. On Sunday, beginning at 12:30, people who wish to walk from near the original
site of the first court of Orange County may come into Hillsborough and park at the Sheriff's Department.
There will be shuttle buses. It will be a three and a half mile hike with stops along the way. At 4:00, the
Hillsborough Historical Society is presenting a speaker. On Monday, which is the official anniversary, at
noon, church and other bells will ring throughout the County 25 times and there will be a brief ceremony.
Schools have been invited also.
Commissioner Gordon asked how many brochures would be published. Dianne Reid said that
there would be 2500 printed initially.
Dianne Reid distributed items to the Board of County Commissioners - t-shirts and pins.
Chair Jacobs read the proclamation.
A motion was made by Commissioner Brown, seconded by Commissioner Halkiotis to approve and
authorize the Chair to sign the proclamation as stated below:
TO PROCLAIM A YEARLONG CELEBRATION BEGINNING SEPTEMBER 9, 2002 TO
COMMEMORATE THE 250T" ANNIVERSARY OF THE FOUNDING OF ORANGE COUNTY
WHEREAS, on September 9, 1752, a new county was born of the North Carolina colonial back country -
a county that spanned the area from present-day Greensboro to present-day Cary, from the Virginia line
to the Uwharrie mountains, and
WHEREAS, on that day Orange County became a reality as the first colonial Court of Pleas and Quarter
Sessions was held at Grayfields along the Eno River, and
WHEREAS, the new County -originally inhabited by the Occaneechi/Saponi nation and other native
American tribes -included 4,000 persons and a land area of 3,500 square miles, including all of present
day Alamance, Caswell, Person, Durham and Chatham counties as well as parts of Wake, Lee,
Randolph, Guilford and Rockingham counties, and
WHEREAS, as citizens of one of the oldest Piedmont counties, Orange County's 120,000 residents have
much to celebrate, including
- A commitment to education, from the founding of the University of North Carolina, the
nation's first state university when it opened in 1795, through the development of six
freedmen's schools formed in Orange County by 1868, to local school systems rated among
the best in the southeastern United States.
- A will to preserve cultural and natural resources such as the County's tapestry of distinctive
buildings, neighborhoods, farmlands and natural treasures like Occoneechee Mountain, the
N.C. Botanical Garden, and the Eno River Corridor.
- A growing diversity, beginning with the Indian nations, recast by the arrival of people from
Europe and Africa, and shaped recently by the addition of many persons from Asia, Latin
America and other places around the globe.
- An ongoing love of independence, whether reflected in the actions of the Regulators or the
patriots of the American Revolution, by women fighting far their equality, by African-
Americans struggling to secure their civil rights, by sharecroppers and mill workers striving for
dignity, or by free-speech advocates in the mid-20t" century.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Orange County Board of Commissioners
acknowledges the contributions and history of the past 250 years, and officially proclaims the
year beginning September 9, 2002 as a year of celebration of the County's 250t" anniversary.
This, the 3rd day of September 2002
VOTE: UNANIMOUS
6. SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS
a. Update on Mental Health Reform Planning Process
The Board received an update on the status of the state-mandated planning process for
mental health reform, and received advice concerning key choices ahead.
Gwen Harvey provided a brief introduction and said that attempting to reform a statewide
mental health developmental disability and substance abuse system is a daunting process. The County
is required to do a sweeping reform of the service system over the five-year period. There have been a
large number of meetings across the State involving a broad range of stakeholders. There was a
steering committee comprised of OPC staff including the County Managers and representatives of the
Boards for Orange, Person, and Chatham Counties. Executive Director of OPC Tom Maynard is here to
provide the Board with an update on the work of the steering committee. This is a prologue to the public
forum, which will be on October 8t".
Tom Maynard said that it is difficult to be brief when they have such a monumental task
before them. He said that Commissioner Brown has been outstanding in her involvement with the OPC
Board.
He went over the State Plan Progress Report. The planning process is on schedule. The next step is
public forums. The draft of the final plan is scheduled to be presented to the Boards of Commissioners
by November 1, 2002. The final plan will identify and recommend solutions far any issues which may
appear either controversial or represent serious risk to the County. He said that governance is a big
issue because the State has mandated that the counties participating choose a governance structure.
There are different possible structures for governance. OPC is assuming that all three counties are
staying together. So far, they are looking at a public model, which encourages strong commissioner,
consumer, and family involvement. The OPC attorney is reviewing the structural options. He said that
some OPC programs are interested in independence, but mast are not. The transition plan will take time
and must be orderly. They have also learned that County run programs are an option. Regarding the
funding plan, OPC intends to present a plan that improves services with no net increase in County costs.
Significant service improvements will depend upon aState-financing plan. He recognized Judy Truitt,
Project Manager, who has done a tremendous amount of work on the plan.
Commissioner Brown said that this has been a significant challenge far her. She said that
serving on the OPC Board has been the best experience that she has had an a board (with the exception
of the Board of County Commissioners}. She does not think that the reorganization is a positive move
because there is no funding in order to be creative. The County is going to be responsible for taking
care of the mentally ill in the next 5 years. She spent the summer visiting sites within the counties -
group homes, nursing homes, the club for mentally ill and schizophrenic citizens, etc. and tried to
understand all of the services that OPC provides to this vulnerable population. She thinks that the
reorganization will require a lot of meetings with other entities, {i.e., UNC, hospitals, health departments,
social services, churches, etc.}. She said that one piece that it is extremely troubling is the history that
has gone ahead of us and what happens to these vulnerable people. Many of these people end up living
near and around courtrooms and jails. She thinks that we need to do whatever we can to prevent this.
Housing is going to be one of the big challenges. The other piece is the nursing homes and adult care
facilities for these people to go to. Her understanding is that many of the people that are going to be
released will go to nursing homes and adult care facilities.
Chair Jacobs thanked Mr. Maynard and Mrs. Truitt. He said that we are fortunate that
Commissioner Brown has made such a commitment to representing the interests of the citizens and this
Board in this process.
Commissioner Halkiotis said that he took a tour of Umstead Hospital. He said that he really
does not know why any mature, responsible adult would venture dawn a road that has a map that is
missing so many identification points. He is not really sure that people at the State level comprehend
where they are going. He does not understand why the State plan requires that the LME {Local
Management Entity) not provide services. He thought that one of the richest components of OPC was
that it was always generating new opportunities to assist citizens. He said that the state seems to be
divesting itself of its responsibilities as State government. He is not convinced that this is a smart move.
He said that nobody uses the word "privatization" in all of this, but it smells like privatization. He would
like to see some openness on who is pushing this at the State level and what the vested interest is.
Commissioner Brown said that there has been several court cases on community care. She
said that that people have misused the community care idea to mean that all the funding is supposed to
come from the community. She thinks that the state has deliberately used it as a way to put the financial
burden on the local level.
Commissioner Carey said that the Orange County Commissioners are not the only ones in
the State concerned about this issue and that the NCACC has not embraced this program yet but they
are concerned. His question is whether the committee is going to make one recommendation on the
LME options or if it would present the pros and cons of each.
Tom Maynard responded by saying that the decision at the outset does not have to be the
final one. Some of the other options could continue to be studied and reviewed.
Commissioner Carey asked if the Board would hear some responses to some of the
questions in the agenda abstract at some point in the near future. Tom Maynard said that these issues
would be presented at the public forum.
Jahn Link said that they would come back with the pros and cans of the three models
available. They will come back during October to each of the three Boards of Commissioners and get
some collective direction on the governance issue. He thinks that, in order for this to be successful, the
County Commissioners need to be in charge. County Commissioners have demonstrated throughout the
State the ability to adapt to new programming, change, hurricanes, disasters, etc. This is an opportunity
to show Raleigh what the Board of County Commissioners can da and how they can respond for those
that cannot speak for themselves.
Chair Jacobs suggested inviting the legislators to the October 8, 2002 Forum and to look at
where we might want to suggest changes to the structure of the law. If there are glaring flaws, then the
Board can make the case to try and get it changed as quickly as possible. Orange County will go the
extra mile and with UNC Hospital it will make Orange County a mecca for other counties.
Commissioner Brown said that the Commissioners are in a good position to make this work
and it is up to the County Commissioners to provide for our citizens. It is our legislative and community
responsibility to take care of our citizens.
Chair Jacobs said to John Link that we need to think about creating some time for the Board
to find another evening to discuss these issues because it is a significant matter.
Commissioner Brown suggested that the invitation process for the October 8t" forum be wide
open so that everyone is encouraged to attend.
b. Community Development Block Grant Award - IDA Program
The Board considered authorizing the execution of a grant agreement, funding approval form,
signatory form, certification cards and a resolution for the FY 2001 Community Development Block Grant
award, and considered adoption of a grant project ordinance for the award.
John Link said that the County has been officially awarded a $40,000 Community
Development Block Grant to assist first time homebuyers with incomes below 80°!° of median income
through an Individual Development Account program. He introduced Housing and Community
Development Director Tara Fikes.
Tara Fikes said that this grant would be matched with $40,000 from the Board, which was
committed in April to this program. They will be able to assist 20 first time homebuyers who participate in
a savings program where they save at least $1,000 over an 18-month period and then the $1,000 is
matched with $2,000, giving them $3,000 to put towards a down payment on a home. The Women's
Center will be administering this program.
Commissioner Brown said that the Social Service Board sponsored a Work First program last
week. This program has worked very well for extremely low-income families that have saved money to
put in their housing fund.
Commissioner Carey asked if there was a waiting list and the answer was no because this is
a finite program with a finite amount of money.
Chair Barry Jacobs said that welfare reform was probably not the best thing, but the Wheels
for Wark program and this program are some creative responses at the local level using whatever
resources are available and that the County does kick in money for programs.
A motion was made by Commissioner Brown, seconded by Commissioner Carey to approve:
1. Execution of the Grant Agreement; Funding Approval Form; and Signatory Form and
Certification cards;
2. The adoption of the Grant Project Ordinance for this grant award; and
3. The approval of the resolution giving signatory authority to the Chair of the Board of
County Commissioners.
VOTE: UNANIMOUS
7. PUBLIC HEARINGS -NONE
8. ITEMS FOR DECISION -CONSENT AGENDA
A motion was made by Commissioner Carey, seconded by Commissioner Brown to approve those
items on the consent agenda as stated below:
a. Minutes
This item was removed and placed at the end of the consent agenda for separate
consideration.
b. Commission for Women -Four Appointments
The Board appointed Letitia Jean Burns and Angelika Langen to terms expiring June 30,
2003, Jeanette Holloman to a term expiring June 30, 2005, and Martha A. Hoylman to a term expiring
June 30, 2004 Commission for Women.
c. Budget Amendment #2
The Board approved a budget ordinance amendment for the County's 250th anniversary
celebration and capital project ordinances far the Register of Deeds office's Automation Enhancement
and Preservation Fund and Optical Imaging Records System capital project.
d. Collection of Solid Waste Fees, Fines and Penalties
This item was removed and placed at the end of the consent agenda far separate
consideration.
e. Agreement with UNC: Hospitals for hiealthy Carolinians Coordinator Funds
The Board approved and authorized the Chair to sign an agreement between the Health
Department and UNC Hospitals far funds to support the Healthy Carolinians Coordinator.
f. Extension of EMS Transportation Contract with Orange EMS and Rescue Squad
The Board renewed and authorized the Chair to sign a contract with Orange EMS and
Rescue Squad, Inc. to provide transportation for EMS through December 31, 2002.
g_ Contract with People's Channel for BOCC Meetings
This item was removed and placed at the end of the consent agenda far separate
consideration.
h. Topographic Survey of McGowan Creek Preserve
The Board awarded and authorized the Chair to sign a contract with Landmark Surveying,
Inc., in the estimated amount of $60,000, for a topographic survey of a portion of the McGowan Creek
Preserve property.
i. Topographic Survey of Chapel Hill Township Park and Educational Campus
The Board awarded and authorized the Chair to sign a contract to Mary E. Myers, PLS, in the
estimated amount of $37,100, for a topographic survey of the property planned for the Chapel Hill
Township Park and Educational Campus.
L Bid Award: Landfill Compactor for Orange County Landfill
The Board awarded and authorized the Chair to sign a bid for a landfill compactor for the
Orange County landfill to Road Machinery, Inc. of Statesville, in the amount of $317,000.
k. Amendment to HUD Cooperative Agreement for FFY 2002
The Board approved an amendment to the cooperative agreement between Orange County
and the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development for the Partnership Initiative FY 2002.
VOTE ON THE CONSENT AGENDA: UNANIMOUS
ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA
a. Minutes
The Board considered approval and/or correction of minutes from the following meetings:
March 18, 2002 work session; May 21, 2002 regular meeting; May 23, 2002 budget presentation/work
session; May 28, 2002 quarterly public hearing; May 30, 2002 budget public hearing; June 4, 2002
regular meeting; June 6, 2002 budget public hearing; June 11, 2002 budget work session; June 17, 2002
budget work session; and, June 18, 2002 regular meeting.
A motion was made by Commissioner Gordon, seconded by Commissioner Brown to approve
March 18t", May 21 ~, May 30t", and June 6t" and to hold the rest until the next meeting.
VOTE: UNANIMOUS
d. Collection of Solid Waste Fees. Fines and Penalties
The Board considered approving a resolution authorizing the Solid Waste Management
Department to collect solid waste fees, fines and penalties, and to perform other enforcement activities
provided for in Orange County laws and ordinances.
Commissioner Brown said that she brought this up because our Solid Waste department has
outstanding accounts. She wants a list of the outstanding accounts.
Commissioner Carey asked if we have made any effort to collect these outstanding accounts
in the past, and if so, what have we done.
Solid Waste Director Gayle Wilson said that we have adopted some additional fees that we
had not had in the past related to the new ordinance that was passed. There is one account for $3,000
and another one for $1,500. These accounts have been outstanding for some time. They worked out a
payment plan with one of the individuals, but they have not seen him since and he has not made the first
payment.
Commissioner Halkiatis asked if there were people with charge accounts and Gayle Wilson
said yes.
Chair Jacobs asked about additional fees for being late in paying and Gayle Wilson said that
there was a late fee. It is comparable to the properly tax late fee, about 1.5°~.
Commissioner Brown also asked for an explanation of the policy of how to administer the late
fee.
Chair Jacobs would also like to knave haw long overdue the accounts are.
A motion was made by Commissioner Halkiotis, seconded by Commissioner Brown to
approve and authorize the Chair to sign a resolution allowing the County Solid Waste Management
Department to perform necessary collection activities as provided in Orange County laws and
ordinances.
VOTE: UNANIMOUS
g_ Contract with People's Channel for BOCC Meetings
The Board considered renewing a contract with the People's Channel to telecast Board of
County Commissioners meetings for FY 2002-2003.
Commissioner Brown asked if all of the County Commissioners' meetings were shown an all
of the cable stations in the area. She said that somehow Carrboro's meetings are not available for
viewing in the Chapel Hill cable network. She does not understand how this works. County Attorney
Geof Gledhill said that it is a franchise issue. He said that the County Commissioners' meetings were
not seen in Carrboro.
Chair Jacobs said that he and Commissioner Carey met with several representatives of the
Triangle J Cable Consultation group and with the Chair of the Cable TV Committee. They came up with
a strategy for trying to reengage Time Warner to augment what we already have and to try and get them
to fulfill their obligations. One of the issues that was raised was that Carrboro could not view County
Commissioners' meetings.
Commissioner Halkiotis said that he hopes that the People's Channel will be around for a long
time.
Commissioner Brown asked if the People's Channel was willing to televise other meetings of
the County Commissioners. Purchasing and Central Services Director Pam Jones said that they have
always accommodated the County before on different meetings. The cost is based on a per unit basis.
A motion was made by Commissioner Halkiotis, seconded by Commissioner Carey to renew
and authorize the Chair to sign a contract with the People's Channel to telecast Board of County
Commissioners meetings for FY 2002-2003.
VOTE: UNANIMOUS
9. ITEMS FOR DECISION -REGULAR AGENDA
a. Scope and Timeline for Sale of 20Q1 Bonds and Alternative Financing
The Board considered amending as needed and approving staff plans to pursue the first sale
of voter approved 2001 general obligation bonds far the first installment of planned alternative capital
financing.
John Link said that they have tried to capture the comments made by the County
Commissioners previously. He said that Ken Chavious has some good news about how the County can
potentially save money in financing by rolling over some existing bonds with a refinancing in March as
well as pursuing the proposed bond sale in March.
Budget Director Donna Dean said that the proposal has asix-year plan. The $75 million band
package is included as well as the $37.8 million in alternative financing that were the priority needs
identified by the Capital Needs Task Force. She made reference to Table 5, the multi-colored page and
said that this outlines the differences between what the Board saw in March, 2002, the last iteration from
June, and then what is being proposed tonight. One of the changes is the issue dates. The proposal is
that the alternative financing issue be done in December 2002 and that the first issue of the bond be
done in March 2003. By issuing the alternative-financing plan earlier, we are able to take advantage of
being bank qualified. This means that we issue less than $10 million in a calendar year. This allows us
to take advantage of some lower interest rates. The first bond issue would be $19.1 million.
Another change is the addition to the Board of Education that the Orange County Schools had
proposed. Orange County Schools are exploring different alternatives for locating their Central Office
Staff from the Hillsborough Elementary location and possibly relocating them at other current facilities
within the district. They may not require the addition to be built. The proposal is that we postpone the
$1.6 million in alternative financing, and if it were needed, then it would be issued in future years.
Regarding the alternative financing plan, Donna Dean said that they were hoping that
sometime very soon that the Board would determine whether this is the plan that we are going to go with.
A public hearing would be needed on November 19t" and in December we would be able to go forward to
the focal Government Commission for them to approve the financing plan.
Regarding the bond issuance in March, Donna Dean said that the only difference is putting
additional money into the Orange County Schools to begin planning for the middle school. In order to
move forward with the March bond sale, a public hearing would be held in January 2003. The Board
would need to approve a resolution in February, and then the bond sale would be in early March.
Donna Dean made reference to the estimated impact on taxpayers for alternative financing
and the bond package and said that the impact would be seven to eight cents. Next year the impact
would be a little less than a penny.
Commissioner Halkiotis asked what aone-cent increase yielded and Donna Dean said
$924,000.
Commissioner Halkiotis verified that this is going to be shared with bath superintendents. He
said that he is involved in coordinating the move of the staff at the Central Office and they are going to
be going to a number of different facilities. He thinks that there is more of a personal discomfort level
because they are all one big family. They are going to Cedar Ridge High School, Orange High School,
Cameron Park, and a mobile unit. There are some similar issues with Chapel Hill-Carrboro City Schools
and both systems are going to be challenged.
Commissioner Brown verified that the renovation of Hillsborough Elementary School is going
to proceed. Six additional class rooms will be built in order to expand the population of the school by 100
students because there is a waiting list of people who want their children in year round elementary
school.
Commissioner Gordon asked about the renovations and Commissioner Halkiotis said that the
air quality and bathroom problems would be taken care of and that there is going to be a complete
renovation of the existing media center.
Donna Dean said that the funding for this includes $900,000 in bonds and $500,000 in impact
fees that the Board approved with the CIP in June.
Commissioner Halkiotis said that the school board did a very deliberate plan to address
health and safety issues and bringing the facility up to current standards.
Chair Jacobs asked about the items the Board should address because it was now 10:15.
Commissioner Carey suggested acting on the Durham Technical Satellite Campus Advisory
Committee and the ABC Board appointments and then hearing the report on growth controls.
Commissioner Brown would like to send the Jury Commission back for more applicants.
b. Master Telecommunications Plan (MTP) (Wireless Facilities)
The Board received a report and discussed the creation of a master telecommunications plan
(MTP) (wireless element).
Craig Benedict reviewed this plan and said that over the last year the staff has been reviewing
applications and finding out what aspects of the existing ordinance need revision. In March, the County
invoked asix-month moratorium, which ends September 6`". The Master Telecommunications Plan
provides an opportunity for wireless facilities to occur on public property (parks, public safety areas,
Sheriff's office, EMS facilities, etc.). He submitted a proposal of where sites can be located in the
County. He has met with various departments and located all of the park sites within the County.
Another option is locating facilities on water tanks. He said that they have contacted all of the public
entities and asked them if they would like to participate in this plan. They have also asked all of the
volunteer fire stations in the County and they have need for communication services also. A lot of sites
have been identified and the staff is asking that the Board approve of proceeding with this general
concept to identify all properties and have an actual sign-up list of people that meet the criteria. The
towers would not be more than 200 feet tall on the public properties. If they needed to be more than 200
feet tall, then it would have to go through a special use permit process. Another area that is considered
is voluntary agricultural districts. Some of these have been identified. The farming community is in favor
of having this opportunity.
Craig Benedict said that Master Telecommunications Plans throughout the country include
public rights-of-way and public property. He said that if an MTP does not get adopted at all by the
County, it does not harm the existing regulations that would be part of the Telecommunications
Ordinance. If the MTP is adopted, the first round of new towers to be built in the County will come to the
Planning Department in December of each year.
Commissioner Carey asked about the one big public hearing and if it was a joint hearing and
if it was the only time that a landowner could get a site approved. Craig Benedict said that the Planning
Board would be notifying all people in the areas. Once the MTP is adopted, anyone can add on to it
once a year. He said that there are na restrictions for putting a tower on private property, but it would
require a special use permit.
Commissioner Carey asked about the list of criteria and if there was a private site and
voluntary agricultural site in the same vicinity. He asked what process would be used so that the County
does not get accused of being biased in favor of the County site because of the revenue potential. Craig
Benedict said that for a private site, there would be a special use process, and if the site were on the
MTP, there would be a full public hearing process. There would be the same amount of public input for
both sites.
Commissioner Brown verified that the Board was to only vote on the wireless element of this
plan tonight.
Jahn Link made reference to page 10, number 6 and said that this is only an example.
Commissioner Brown asked about number 6 and what existing material would be put there or
if more material would be created. Jahn Link said that it would be whatever the Board of County
Commissioners approves.
Commissioner Gordon asked about the 20Q-foot limit and asked if that number could be
changed. Craig Benedict said that for the MTP issue, it is up to the Board because the County would
own the property.
Commissioner Gordon suggested having two different tiers of towers.
Chair Jacobs agreed with Commissioner Gordon and said that if we go to the public hearing
with all of these sites that it might not be goad and it might be better to phase this plan in gradually.
Commissioner Halkiotis agreed with Chair Jacobs.
Chair Jacobs said that the Board would take another opportunity to discuss this at a later
date.
b.2 Report and Action on Growth Controls in Large Residential Projects
The Board was to receive a report an elements associated with the implementation of growth
controls in large residential projects, and consider providing direction to the County Attorney and
Planning Director to prepare a special use process outline for major subdivisions.
POSTPONED
c. Alcoholic Beverage Control Board -Two Appointments
The Board considered two appointments to the Alcoholic Beverage Control Board.
Commissioner Carey nominated Leo Allison.
Chair Jacobs nominated Janet Cain.
This was seconded by Commissioner Halkiotis.
VOTE: UNANIMOUS
d. Durham Tech Satellite Campus Advisory Committee for Praarammina Needs
Assessment fACPNAI-Nine Appointments
The Board considered nine appointments to the Durham Tech Satellite Campus Advisory
Committee for Programming Needs Assessment.
A motion was made by Chair Jacobs, seconded by Commissioner Carey to appoint Sue
Holloday as the representative of a large employer within the County.
VOTE: UNANIMOUS
A motion was made by Commissioner Carey, seconded by Commissioner Halkiotis to appoint
Alois Callemyn as the representative from the Economic Development Commission.
VOTE: UNANIMOUS
A motion was made by Commissioner Halkiotis, seconded by Commissioner Brown to appoint
Barry Phillips as the representative of a small business employer within the County.
VOTE: UNANIMOUS
A motion was made by Commissioner Halkiotis, seconded by Commissioner Brown to appoint
Betty Eidener and Caleb Moore for the citizens-at-large representatives.
VOTE: UNANIMOUS
Commissioner Carey and Commissioner Halkiatis will serve as the County Commissioners'
representatives.
e. Economic Development Commission -Three Reappointments and One New
Appointment
The Board was to consider three reappointments and one new appointment to the Economic
Development Commission.
Postponed
f. Jury Commission -One Appointment
The Board considered one appointment to the Jury Commission.
The Board decided to re-advertise for this position.
g_ Little River Park Advisory Committee -Two Reappointments and One New
Appointment
The Board was to consider two reappointments and one new appointment to the Little River
Park Advisory Committee.
Postponed
h. Solid Waste Advisory Board -One Appointment
The Board was to consider one appointment to the Solid Waste Advisory Board.
Postponed
i. Human Services Advisory Commission -Two Appointments
The Board considered two appointments to the Human Services Advisory Commission.
A motion was made by Commissioner Carey, seconded by Commissioner Halkiotis to appoint
Lois Kinzie for a term expiring March 31, 2004 and Linda Tuday for a term expiring March 31, 2003.
VOTE: UNANIMOUS
10. REPORTS
11
12. MINUTES
13. CLOSED SESSION
A motion was made by Commissioner Brown, seconded by Commissioner Halkiatis "To consult
with the County Attorney in order to preserve the attorney-client privilege between the County Attorney
and the Board concerning two matters, one of which is Orange County v. the Nuclear Regulatory
Commission," NCGS § 143-318.11(a)(3} at 10:50 p.m.
VOTE: UNANIMOUS
14. ADJOURNMENT
A motion was made by Commissioner Gordan and seconded by Commissioner Halkiotis to
to adjourn the meeting at 11:30 p.m. The next scheduled meeting of the Board of County Commissioners
will be a Work Session on Monday, September 9, 2002 at the Government Services Center in
Hillsborough, North Carolina.
Barry Jacobs, Chair
Donna S. Baker
Clerk to the Board