HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda - 08-18-2009eAG ed
cdtgl09
ORANGE COUNTY
BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
ACTION AGENDA ITEM ABSTRACT
Meeting Date: August 18, 2009
Action Agen a
Item No.
SUBJECT: Approval of Proposed Emergency Medical Charge Review Process
DEPARTMENT: Emergency Services, Revenue PUBLIC HEARING: (Y /N) No
ATTACHMENT(S):
Proposed Emergency Medical Charge
Review Process
INFORMATION CONTACT:
Frank Montes de Oca, 245 -6100
Kim Woodward, 245 -6100
Jo Roberson, 245 -2727
PURPOSE: To present for adoption proposed appeals process for a concerned citizen to
dispute a charge for emergency medical services rendered.
BACKGROUND: From time to time since Orange County began charging for Emergency
Services in November 1996 instances have occurred when medical charges are questioned due
to billing errors, patient care complaints, and mistaken identity. These concerns are addressed
quickly by staff and are typically resolved. Infrequently, there are cases where careful review by
staff leads to the recommendation that the charge for emergency medical services rendered to
the patient be voided. Since 2000 there have been only four reviews that resulted in bills being
waived. In 2008 several transports occurred causing the Revenue Department Director and
Emergency Services Department Director to review them for correctness and appropriateness.
This was an anomaly and the procedure causing these billings has been corrected.
Currently only the Board has the authority to abolish emergency medical charges. However, it
would be a breach of patient confidentiality under Health Insurance Portability and
Accountability Act ( HIPAA) if the emergency medical documentation required for a
determination were to be presented in a public meeting for Board action. HIPAA and state laws
do not necessarily preclude sharing of patient information among and between EMS providers
and other health care providers, law enforcement, regional and state quality assurance
systems, and other users of public health data. However, in the exchange of such information,
EMS providers and systems are to be vigilant in ensuring the protection of data for the purpose
it is being released. The sharing of protected information should be kept at a minimum
ensuring that anyone with access has received the training required to access private health
information.
Staff in consultation with County Attorney's Office has developed an appeals proposal that
would provide for timely, objective review and resolution of patient concerns by the appropriate
County officials in compliance with HIPAA regulations.
2
Under the proposed process, the County Manager, or designee, would be delegated authority
by the Board to receive the review and recommendation of the Emergency Services Director
and /or Revenue Director, and make a final decision on whether a bill for emergency medical
services should be voided.
The specifics of the proposal are contained in the attachment. If approved by the Board, Staff
will begin immediate implementation of the process.
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
Management decisions, under authority delegated by the Board, to void patient bills would
impact total revenues received for by the County for Emergency Medical Services rendered.
However, Departmental experience indicates only a small number of cases have occurred in the
past decade that would have amounted to less than $5,000.
RECOMMENDATION(S): The Interim Manager recommends the Board approve the proposed
Emergency Medical Charge Review Process.
3
ORANGE COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
Hillsborough, North Carolina
Emergency Medical Charge Review Process
PROPOSED
OBJECTIVE: When complaints or concerns arise after EMS care has been
rendered and billing conducted, customers should have an appropriate venue for
a fair and timely review of charges and records. The review process must be
sanctioned and delegated by the Board of County Commissioners since theirs is
the only authority to void medical fees, should that be the ultimate outcome,
Also, the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPPA), the federal
regulation that regulates protected health information, dictates that patient
medical records must be handled and reviewed by persons trained in the
protection of health information. This document outlines a proposed process for
the proper review of medical records and the resolution of a concern on behalf of
the Board consistent with protected health information rules.
SCOPE: This review process applies to billing for Emergency Medical Services
rendered to patients. Emergency Services charges to special events standbys
are not included.
POLICY /PROCEDURE:
Questions related to billing for EMS services rendered typically fall into one of
two categories: Billing, filing and insurance concerns, (i.e. a patient's insurance
company does not have enough information to process the claim) or medical
care complaints (i.e. the patient is concerned the Emergency Services unit failed
to provide the appropriate level of service) However some complaints will require
investigation in both categories.
Billing, Filing, and Insurance Concerns
• All concerns about billing, filing, and insurance should be directed to
the Revenue Department.
4
• If the EMS division receives a complaint and determines that the issue
is predominately one that involves billing, filing, or insurance the
complaint information will be forwarded to the Revenue Department.
Medical Care Complaints
• All concerns about medical care rendered by the Orange County EMS
should be directed to the Emergency Services Department.
o The EMS Operations Manager will acquire the patient care
report.
o The EMS Operations Manager, in compliance with federal,
state, and local confidentiality rules will contact the complainant
and will ascertain their relationship to the patient.
o The EMS Operations Manager will document the call and will
log the question on the appropriate form.
• If the Revenue Department receives a complaint and determines that
the issue is predominately one about medical care rendered by Orange
County EMS, the complaint information will be forwarded to the
Emergency Services Department.
• If the complainant is not lawfully allowed to represent the patient, the
complainant will be informed that Emergency Services is unable to
discuss the details of the medical care. Emergency Services will
describe who is legally able to represent the patient.
• If the complainant is lawfully allowed to represent the patient, the EMS
Operations Manager will make reasonable effort to discuss the
concern with the patient or their representative.
• If after speaking with the EMS Operations Manager the patient or
representative requests further review related to the care rendered, the
EMS Operations Manager will forward the concern to the Emergency
Services Director.
o The EMS Operations Manager will provide to the ES director a
synopsis of the concern as it relates to the medical care rendered,
the contact information for the representative, and any appropriate
documentation.
2
5
o The Emergency Services Director will review the documentation
and may contact the patient or their representative. The Director
may also confer with the Medical Director as necessary.
o The Emergency Services Director will submit a written
recommendation on whether the bill should be voided to the
County Manager, or County Manager designee, for a final decision.
o The complainant will be notified in writing of the County Manager's
decision. The Revenue Director will also receive a copy of the
notification.
• If the patient or representative has further questions or concerns
related to billing, filing, or insurance the issue will be referred to the
Revenue Director.
o The Revenue Director will continue the complaint
documentation per the guidance above.
C