Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutORD-2003-142 PD-1-03 State Employees Credit Union Addition Special use permitORANGE COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS AN D PLANNING BOARD PUBLIC HEARING AGENDA ITEM ABSTRACT Meeting Date: November 24, 2003 1 ~~~ p ~~.,. ado ~ - l~ ~ !~' 07 y ' ~ .`~ Action Agenda Item No. C.1 .a SUBJECT: PD-1-03 State Employees Credit Union Addition Planned Development Rezoning and Class A Special Use Permit DEPARTMENT: Planning & Inspections PUBLIC HEARING: (YIN) YES ATTACHMENT(S): INFORMATION CONTACT: NCDOT Requirements (1997 Letters) Craig Benedict, Director, Ext.2592 Application Eddie -Kirk, Planner II, Ext. 2582 Vicinity Map Staff Memorandum TELEPHONE NUMBERS: Findings of Planning Staff Hillsborough 732-8181 Additional Information Chapel Hill 968-4501 Site Plan Maps (Separate Enclosure) ~ Durham 688-7331 NCDOT Comments (11-17-03 Letter) Mebane 336-227-2031 Hillsborough Area EDD Cross Section __ PURPOSE: To receive evidence and public comment regarding the State Employees Credit Union proposed Planned Development rezoning and Class A Special Use Permit for expansion of -the existing facilities. BACKGROUND: Applicants: State Employees Credit Union 1000 Wade Avenue P.O. Box 27665 Raleigh, NC 27611-7665 (919) 839-5000. O'Brien/Atkins Suite 400 5001 S. Miami Blvd. Durham, NC .27.709 (919) 941-9000 Location: At the intersection of Old NC 86 and Oakdale Drive (SR 1133) Township:. Hillsborough Proposed changes: The applicant is requesting the existing 5,000 sq. ft. building be increased to -7,334 sq. ft., a 634 sq. ft. remote teller office be constructed with a 2,000 sq. ft. canopy and the existing drive through facilities be relocated with the addition of one drive through lane. Current Conditions.: Zonin :Economic Development -Limited Office 1 (ED-L0-1) Adjacent Property Zoning: Economic Development -Limited Office 1 (ED-LO-1 } Proposed Zoning: Planned Development Economic Development Linear Office (PD-ED-LNR), Class A Special Use Permit Total Acreage: 3.25 The addition. of 1.37 acres to the existing 1.88 acre site. ~ ~:~ 2 Traffic Patterns: bequest is for three access points, two from Old NC86 and one from Oakdale Drive. NCDOT is recommending one access point to Old NC 86. Planning Staff is recommending one right-in / right-out access point to Old NC86. One stub-out will be constructed to the southern property line to provide for interconnectivity. Water-Sewer: Hillsborough water and sewer is located at the site. Lines will be extended to the remote teller office. Agency Comments: Comments attached from Town of Hillsborough, Sheriffs Office, Emergency Management, and NCDOT. Zoning. Consistency: The proposed expansion plan does not meet three of the performance standards of the ED- LNRzoning district. However, the ordinance allows the Board of Commissioners to deviate from these standards through the Planned Development process if it (BOCC) determines that a public benefit or purpose is being met. • The maximum floor area limit in the Linear Office District is 5,000 square feet for each. 20,000 square foot zoning lot. - This proposal will be on 3.25 acres or 141,570 square feet.. The total constructed square footage proposed is substantially less than that which would be allowed with. eight separate 20,000 square foot lots [i.e. 40,000 square feet]. This proposal is to expand the existing building to 7,334 square feet total with a new remote teller station of 634 square feet and arelocated -new canopy of 2,000 square feet. The total construction will be 9,968 or less than one-fourth of what would be allowed in the district using minimum sized zoning lots. If the 1.37 acres were subdivided and developed separately as two zoning lots, each lot could allow up to 5,000 square feet each. Additional office space to accommodate walk in traffic is a part of this. proposal., • The Hillsborough Area EDD has a prohibition against drive-through facilities. - The existing facility has four drive-through lanes, including the ATM lane. The request is to relocate these lanes and add- one extra drive through lane. The additional lane has the potential to reduce emissions by shortening the wait time of individuals performing transactions. The Credit Union- is promoting use of on line banking which also may reduce the number of trips. • The maximum building height is 30 feet. - The existing building is 35 feet in height. The additions are less than 30 feet in height. The following conditions were placed on the State Employees Credit Union when the Special Use Permit was originally approved on April 21, 1998. Existing Class A, Special Use Conditions: (Recorded 7-17-98; Book 1763, Page 450) 1. Sewer lines shall be installed at the time of site development. 2. Parking, landscaping and buffers shall be installed and maintained as shown on the February 6, 1998 site plan. 3 3. Sidewalks shall be constructed and maintained by the State Employees' Credit Union until the property is annexed by-the Town of Hillsborough: 4. NCDOT requirements as specified in its April 17, 1997 letter and September 16, 1997 letter shall be complied with. (See attached letters) 5. If any condition of this Special Use Permit shall be held invalid or void, then this Special Use Permit shall be void in it's entirety and of no effect. 6. This Special Use Permit shall automatically expire within twelve (12) months of the date of approval if the use has not commenced or construction has not commenced or proceeded unless a timely application for extension of the time limit is approved by the Board of County Commissioners as provided by Section 8.4.11. of the Orange County Zoning Ordinance. Development Process. Schedule, and Action Articles 8.4.3 and 8.4.4 of the Zoning Ordinance require that the Zoning Officer's recommendation be presented to the Planning Board. The public hearing is the time scheduled for presentation of the Zoning Officer's recommendation. Zoning Officer's Recommendation The Zoning Officer has not received information which would esfablish grounds for making a negative finding on the general standards. These sfandards include maintaining or promoting fhe public health, safety, and general welfare, maintaining or enhancing fhe value of contiguous property, and the use being in compliance with the general plan for fhe physical development of the County. The Zoning Officer has reviewed the applicafion, the site plan and all supporting documentation and has found fhat the applicafion-does comply with the specific standards and required regulations concerning the Rezoning,. Planned Development and Special Use Permit except for the requirements the applicant is requesting deviation from. Provided the Planning Board and County Commissioners find in the affirmative on the general standards, fhe Zoning Officer recommends approval of the request. for a Rezoning, Planned- Development, and Special Use Permit for the Sfafe Employees Credit Union subject to the following conditions: 1. Sewer and water lines shall be extended at the time of site development. 2. Parking, landscaping and buffers shall be installed and maintained as shown on the November 3, 2003 site plan. Existing trees wil( be preserved wherever possible. 3. Sidewalks shall be constructed and maintained by the State. Employees' Credit Union until the property is annexed. by the Town of Hillsborough. 4. All NCDOT construction requirements shall be met. Rights-of- way shall be dedicated where required. 4 ~ ~ ~ 5. One right in/right out access entrance on Old NC 86 shall be permitted. 6. A stub out to the south shall be constructed as indicated on the November 3, 2003 site plan. Across-access easement agreement shall be approved by the County Attorney's office prior to recordation of Special Use Permit. 7. If any condition of this Special Use Permit shall be held invalid or void, then this- Special Use Permit shall be void in it's entirety and of no effect. 8. This Special Use Permit shall automatically expire within twelve (12) months of the date of approval if the use has not commenced or construction has not commenced. or proceeded unless a timely application for extension of the time limit is approved by the Board of County Commissioners as provided by Section 8.4.11 of the Orange County Zoning Ordinance. No decision on the application is made by either the Planning Board or the Board of Commissioners at the public hearing. Instead, the Planning Board has 3 regularly scheduled meetings within which to prepare and submit a recommendation to the Board of Commissioners or the Board of Commissioners may direct the Planning Board to provide a recommendation by a date certain. Failure of the Planning Board to submit a recommendation within the required time, the application shall be forwarded to the Board of Commissioners without a Planning Board recommendation. FINANCIAL IMPACT: None determined. RECOMMENDATION(S): Planning Staff Recommendation: Approval of the proposed Zoning Atlas Amendment. rezoning the property from ED-LO-1 to PD-ED-LNR. Approval of the Special Use Permit, Class A with the conditions as listed above. Administration Recommendation: Refer the proposed Zoning Atlas Amendment and proposed Class A Special Use Permit to the Planning Board for a recommendation to be returned to the Board of County Commissioners no sooner than January 26, 2004. ~~..ry ' ~~5 STATE OF N01ZTH CAROLINA DEPART1vtENT OF 1~tANSPORTATION JA~~tES B. Hu~vr JR DNISIOI`1 OF HIGHWAYS GARLivp B. GArxttr JR GOVEtLVOA SECRETARY P. 0. Box 766 `~ Graham, North Carolina ?7253-0766 April 17, 1997 ORaNGE COUNTY Eddie Kirk, Planner . Orange County Planning Department 306F Revere Road Hillsborough, NC 27278 Subject: State Employee's Credit Union -Hillsborough, NC Dear Mr. Kirk: Please be advised that I agree with the Traffic Impact Analysis for the above subject which consists of the following: 1. Developer dedicates an additional five feet of right-of--way along Oakdale Road. 2. Developer dedicates additional right-of way to create a 50-foot right-of--way from the center line of Old NC 86 to the property line. 3. Developer dedicates a 35-foot by 35-foot triangle at the intersection of the two rights-of way. 4. Recommend that Credit Union driveway be shifted approximately 115 feet to the south to line up with other driveway as indic?ted in analysis if ?full movement drive is desired. 5. If shift is not feasible with the proposed site plan, it will become a restrictive drive and other measures will need to be discussed with Orange County and- with NCDOT. Do not hesitate to call Michael S. Venable, Assistant District Engineer, at 910-570-6833 if you require further information. Sincerely, ~~~`A T. J. Dyer DISTRICT ENGIIYEER T7D:MSV:kww - - cc: J. W. Watkins, P.E. ads JA1~tES B. HUNT ~R. GOVER,VOR ORANGE COUNTY ~s r M s' ~~'°'' STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTNI~NT.OF TRANSPORTATION DIVISION OF HIGHI~VAYS P. 0. Hox 766 Graham, North Carolina 27253-0766 16 September 1997 Eddie Kirk Orange County .Planning Department 306F Revere Road Hillsborough, NC 27278 919 732-8181 EXT 2580 tf i G~tu~ty ~ B. G.~w~n-) R SECRETARY SUBJECT: Final Plan Review: State Employees Credit Union (Hillsborough) Dear Mr. Kirk: This office has .completed its review of the subject's proposed final plans for compliance with current Department of Transportation minimum construction standards. We wish to advise that the final plans received at this office on 12 September 1997 are under standby status awaiting revisions. Pursuant to any approval,. this office will require the owner/developer to meet the following requirements before starting any construction. 1. Prior .to any construction of any new access or alteration of any existing access within the right of way, the developer/owner is required to secure a permit with this office.. It is the responsibility of the owner/developer to obtain a permit. 2.~During the construction, it is the responsibility of the. owner/developer to provide verification certifying that the roadway surface, drainage, and seeding satisfies the approved design outside the State's right of way. 3. When working within. the State's right of way, the,- owner/developer will contact the Graham District OfFice before. each of the following phases: (A) Drainage, (B) Grading, (C) Placement of base, (D) Paving, and (E} Seeding.. Failure to notify this office before .each phase of construction may-justify a verification certified and signed by a professional engineer. 5. any area within the State's right of way and/or easements disturbed during the construction and/or maintenance shall be repaired to the satisfaction of the District Engineer or his representative.. ~ ~ -_ ---- ------- -- f' ~o®®~ .~ 6. Before planting. any landscape within the right of way, the encroaching party shall submit an application for a planting permit to this office. The permit must be approved-prior to installing any plants. ~., 7. The owner/developer shall adhere to all the attached requirements and/or the notes. marked on the submitted plans to include A. Traffic movements need to be delineated in driveways B. An encroachment agreement needs to be submitted for the sidewalk that is within the right of way. C..Yard Inlet #8 is,not an approved junction bo:c for DOT R/W D. Storm drainage table should include Drainage Areas and Discharges (Q25) ~ . E. 10' x 70' Site Distance triangles need to be at edge of R/W F. Right of Way needs to be dedicated not reserved If you have any questions, feel free to call me or Mr. Michael Venable at (910) 570-6833. Attachments cc: J. W, Watkins, P.E. Division Engineer Sincerely, -~~~`~ T. J. Dwyer DISTRICT ENGINEER ~~~ (PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT+ INK ONLY). 8/88 APPLICATION FOR CLASS A SPECIAL USE PERMIT ORANGE COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS DATE:~~/~/ G1~ APPLICATION NUMBER: PD- I - 03 I (~Ve) request a Class A Special Use Permit. as rovided for in,}~Article `~• `(/,e2 ~ of the Orange County Zoning Os~rdinance for O,n ~ +~'~on ~? ._..1^e ~' ale. eveEs C+r'~'f- The following information is provided in support. of this request: A. PROPERTY INFORMATION: Street' Address or Location:- 2~ (''~ ~~C~l U[ ~b(o ~ ~°~ ~ So~. Orange County Tax Map i{y Block Lot(s) `~'`tY ~5• ~ ~' Township ~f Zoning District(s): -L-O- to o - = Lot./Parcel Size: .2 } - ~S acres or hi~~7aS L square fee Number of Existing Buildings: Gross Floor Area: ~NSr3'7 s~uare fee Number of Proposed Buildings: t ~' ' ross Floor Area: 63y SP- Elder ~ oZS3~ sF~squa~e fe Water Supply: lS^N~Itsb.%~ (Public (Specify) Community Individua Wastewater Disposal: Public (Specify) Community Individua School District: Fire District: General Land Uses in Area: sue,' . 'o..I ~'+~+ Critical Areas: Stream/Drainagewa Flood Prone Are; Watershed (Specify) Historic Si Other (Explain) ~'hts i5 an 2xrs}1`n~ L`re~~ LM~o., ~o~~`v^- B. SITE PLAN INFORMATION: Twenty-six (Z6) copies of a Site Plan, prepared by a registered North Carolina .surveyor or engineer, are provided as required by Article 8.8 and which contain the following information: North point, scale, and date. ~_ Extent of area to be developed. ~~ Locations and widths of all easements and rights-of-way within or adjacent 'to the site, Location of all existing and proposed structures on the site. ~+nr" .Location of all areas on the .site subject to flood hazard or inundation as shown on flood maps or soils. maps. e` • ~`~ocation of all watez courses on the site, including direction of flow. X Existing topography at a .contour interval of five (5) feet based on .mean sea `y' ~ level datum. ~ - /` Existing and proposed fencing, screening, gates, parking; service, and storage "`~~~ TTT~~~--~~~~ areas. . _~` Access to site, including sight distances on all roads used for access. (PLEASE COMPLETE. REVERSE SIDE) Oda C. OTHER SUBMITTAL INFORMATION: X Elevations of all structures proposed to be used in the development. x Two (2) full-size copies of. the applicable Orange County Tax Map, one (1) copy with the property in question clearly marked. . ~ The names and addresses of the property owner(s) and/or applicant(s), and the names and addresses are all persons owning groperty within five hundred (500) feet of the property in question. ~C Application fee as set by the Orange County Board of Commissioners. , ~ Traffic impact study as required by Article 13 of the Zoning Ordinance. Additional information regarding the proposed Speciai Use as required by s-*~-i-cle--8-of the ~-~nin_g~rdinance Narrative (or letters from appropriate agencies) indicating: 1. Method and adequacy of provision of sewage disposal facilities, solid waste disposal, and water service. Where public sewer is not available, a letter from the Orange County Health Department certifying the suitability of the existing and/or proposed wastewater treatment system for the property. _ 2. Method and adequacy of police, fire, and rescue squad protection. 3. Method and adequacy of vehicular access to the site and traffic conditions around the site. I (We), the applicant(s), hereby certi~fy~ that the foregoing application and supporting documentation is complete and accurate_ I understand that it shall be my (our) responsibility to present evidence to the Board of Commissioners the form of testimony, exhibits, documents, models, plans, and the like to support the request for approval of the Class A Special Use Permit. n ~ ,~ ~ ~ , APPLICAN~SIGNATURE(S) ~ ~ ~" ~. DATE NOTE: If title to the above mentioned property is not in the name of the applicant(s), please include a letter from the owner(s) signi-Eying approval of the request. «ss*~*s«*~**«***~**s*:*****~***~•***s*s*t'+*v~*s**~**s***++v~***~****+***+~ss*:***~ /~03d. dD ~Q3-Q034 . -FEES: Amount $ /, D90, Od Date Paid: ~/ / /~ / 0,~ Receipt # o3-~Q3; ~.1 CURRENT PLANNING DIVISION Application For Orange County Planning & Inspections P1aIlIIeC1 DeVelopmBIIt Di5trlCt P.O. Box 8181 Hillsborough, NC 27278 Zoning Atlas Amendment 919 245-2575 ~1 FAyX 919 644-3002 1. I(We) `''~pttt ~M,w~y~er_s ~t :~' ~nion ~ Owner CASE# Street Address. City do hereby petition to amend the Zoning Atlas of Orange County. NG 61 •7 S 9 i4 . SS3R. So+~o State Zip Code Telephone ----~-Bq-reelassi~ing-#~r~rit~~--Zaniag~District ~ - ~{~ to the Zoning District ~~=~~ - (N~ 3. The properTy located 01 ~ 'x'313 ~~~ Nf ~Sh anCll ~ 1~ ~ ~ ~H~ and having frontage(s) along bordering streets as follows 4. Containing _ 3•~ t?. acres. 5. TM$L(s) PIN#(s) ,•~~• b, o~v~ ~: qy.:~r~ , ati 6. Intended use(s) of the property; (1t'e(~,t~ (/11iv ~ ,j:x~s'f'~" (Please attach on a separate sheet any additional information about the intended use or any special c 7. Ov/ner(s S Ign e(5}: a acknowledge the provisions in the Zoning Ordinance for general. use and ann dev p ent ni and hereb proceed with a planned d velopment zoning petition. 8. If the. petition is executed by property owner, but an attorney or an agent will handle public speaking, etc., please indicate; s00 ~ a~r:en lA~ •ns ~~#a `{0~ S. ~!l;w,,,: t3lt~d. Atto ey or Aeent Street Address City State Zip Telephone 9. Notification signs will be prepared and posted by the Planning Staff whegthe rewning application is scheduled for Public Hearing. The required legal advertising is also handled for you by the Planning Staff. PLEASE MAKE AN APPOINTMENT FOR SUBMITTAL OF YOUR APPLICATION IMPORTANT: Only Applications with on final signatures are considered complete. Fazed Applications NOT accepted. a2) ons to which the petitioner wishes to be bound) Q~~ I. GENERAL 6ITE INFORMATION TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT, WITH ASSISTANCE FROM PLANNING DEPARTMENT AS NEEDED A. Zoning and use of adjacent property. North ~<S~r.~<~.~~a ~ South _ 'C~a~'d~c.~u East ~ Co.,..,,.,e.r.~a./ West Rcs,d~„h~, ~ H. Topography: highest elevation ~~l lowest elevation ~`~ general direction of ~ slope ~~ ~e•S'~ _ .Estimate $ of property with 0 - 5~ slope $~~° 5 - 15$ slope ~ a 15 - 25$ slope more than 25$ slope 1Rectuired only for the portion of the site associated with or impacted by the proposed activit,~~ C. Drainage . Are there any streams r drainage .easements located on ..the property? _ b~~ ~ ~1~,;,~„6(~ !~, G~ ~{ I.tSGS Is any of the site located within ac Watersupply Watershed Water Quality Critical Area ~Floodplain Describe +~ ~~ 3 D. Does the property contain any of the following Inventory Natural or Cultural Resources? (As identified in the "Inventory of Sites of Cultural, .Historical, Recreational, Biological, and Geological Significance in the Unincorporated Portions of Orange County" or the "Inventory of Natural Areas and Wildlife Habitats of Orange County, North Carolina".) ~e s no a. b. c. e. f. g• cemeteries X archaeological sites ~C _ historic sites _~ --- .._ _ ~a~a~o-f-g=eoi=o g z-ca-i=s-i-grrrf c designated natural areas ~ _ cL designated habitat other For each "yes" answer above, please indicate location on site plan and complete the following, with the assistance. of the Orange County Environmental Planner.- Also complete Attachment A. (1)~ Type of resource Inventory reference no..or page Description of Resource (2} Type of resource Inventory ref erence.no. or page Description of resource _ (Attach additional sheets if needed) II. TO BE COMPLETED SY APPLICANT A. PROJECT DESCRIPTION 1. Describe proposed use of property 2---i~umbei'--o-f--i=oT . n - _ ~.._,- - - _ ~~~-/-c~,~,ria~z.-!o . T 3. Number of structures d~ 4. Estimated square footage of area to be graded for. development of attached residential units (excluding roads, but including parking .areas) 5. Estim ted square footage of area to be ded for non-residential use (excluding roads)- cc! s 6. Estimated area to be graded for roads Ilo ~ ~aa-Q~ 7. Road Type: .Public Private Class A Class B Class C Total road length 8. Hours of operation for commercial -or industrial use I~,~`~a -5: 3 o IVl - ~ C fv s ~.o~ S~ ~ ~n.c~Y __ ?~~ S. STATE PERMITS REQUIRED 1. Does the project involve the mining of earth products? ~r~~F~ • _ If so,.how many cubi feet of material are expected to be excavated? .~..~. ~ Has an application for a Mining Permit been submitted to ' NCDRCD? Please attach map indicating. expected. extent of proposed ar+-ivii-v_. _ _. _.. _ 2. -Does the project involve generation or storage of hazardous or toxic wastes, as identified by the Environmental Protection Agency? (A listing of all hazardous materials is available from the Planning Department ) Ny-~ c.~ Describe the wastes to be generated. How much material is expected to be generated per month? Will any material be treated onsite? Volume? Will any material be stored onsite? .Volume? Where will disposal of the material take place? How will materials be transported to the disposal site? What measures are proposed to protect water quality and air quality in case of spills? ~. 3. Nill the project involve a land applicatioa system for treatment of wastewater? ~Iv N~ If yes, describe Has an application for a non-discharge permit been submitted to the NC Department of Environmental • Management or Orange County Department of Environmental Health? 4. Is a segtie tank system .proposed which has a design ._._. _.. - CanaCity- nf-tnr~re~ ..then- Rnnn nwl lnric nsar ~w7_.....__.. ~ ~_. If yes, describe Has an application for a non-discharge permit been submitted to the NC Department of Environmental Management or Orange County Department of Environmental Health? 5.' Does the activity iavolve sludge disposal? If yes, where is the source of the sludge? Describe where and how the sludge is being disposed. Has a NPDES permit from the NC Division of Environmental Management been issued? 6. Hater Usage a. Estimated no. of employees ~ x 25 gpd LSD gpd b. Estimated water use-for climate control gpd c.Process water gpd $ consumed $ discharged to septic system $ discharged to' surface (including storm sewers ) (describe: ) - ~ evaporated ~ reclaimed/reused $ other loo $ [P 9Pd d. Water used for cooling, heating, etc., in association with production or manufacturing reused M~~f~, ~ consumed ~ discharged . (describe: ) ~ other 1.0 0_ _ . 9Pd Total Water Usage e. Describe sour..//ce ,off +water ATTACHMENT A TO BE COMPLETED ONLY IF INVENTORY'SITE(S) IS/ARE IDENTIFIED IN I.E. (ATTACH ADDITIONAL SHEETS IF NECESSARY) (1) a. Impact on Resource from Proposed Development b. Proposed Mitigation (2) a. Impact on Resource from Prop sed evelopment b. Proposed Mitigation / 0 ~~s d ~ . c-1 ~~ , c 1 4.45R..1 •1 C 4.44.6.24 4.45R..1 4.44.6.25 4.45 .. 4.45R..28 .44.6.20 4.44.6.2 8 4. .8.1 E 4.45..2 4 .B.1 D 4.44.8.2 .44.6.20 8 O ~~ L+ ~.. ~~ Butkr t of Pueek This ma carrtains entory P PaY within ?err t;aeet Tent P parcels prepared for the irrv d real ro N peR~ Orange County, and is compied from recorded deed, plaLt: and otlter public jor Roses records and data Users of th's map arc hereby rrortified tltat the aforementioned comas public primary irdomration sources should be consulted for verification d the n ?ert ?axndrp?ext information wrdained on this map. The county and its mapping companies assume ~ .4~~d ~~ ~ tx no legal responsibility for the information contained on this map. Oran a Count GIS ~~ PAGE 1 OI< 3 8/11/2003 TMBL OWNER OWNER2 OLDPIN ADDRESS CITY STATE ZIP 4.45R..28 ALAMANCE NATIONAL BANK 9873060807 1128 SOUTH MAIN ST GRAHAM NC 27253 4.45R..27 ALAMANCE NATIONAL BANK - - 9873062921 P O BOX 1310 GRAHAM- NC 27253 4.45R..1A OLD MILL PROPERTIES LLC 9873071242 P O BOX 1904 GREENVILLE NC 27835 4.45R..1 OLD SOUTH INVESTMENTS LLC 9863979149 103 MILLSTONE DR HILLSBOROUGH NC 27278. 4.45..2C MOORE BOBBY RANDALL JR & COC PROPERTIES INC 9863977490 807 S 3RD STREET MEBANE NC 27302 4.40_A.23A DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTA 9873072758 PO BOX 1351 RALEIGH NC 27602 4.44.A.15 GORDON LAWRENCE 9863877678 201OAKDALEDR HILLSBOROUGH NC 27278-8754 4.44.A.16 LAWS C A ETAL & LYNNE J 9863970720 1300 FAUCETTE MILL RD HILLSBOROUGH NC 27278-8606 4.44.A.17 JENNINGS ELIZABETH 9863971680 109 OAKDALE DR HILLSBOROUGH NC 27278 4.44.A.18 DALEHITE EDNA D & WILMA D WADE 9863973676 P O BOX 806 HILLSBOROUGH NC 27278-0806 4.44.A.19 WADE JAMES H JR ~ & WILMA D ' 9863972881 PO BOX 806 HILLSBOROUGH NC 27278-0806 ~~~ PAGE 2 OF 3 8/11/2003 TMBL OWNER OWNER2 OLDPIN ADDRESS CITY STATE ZIP 4.44.A.20 FREELAND DONNA L 4.44.B.19 ALEXANDER ROY F JR & BRENDA 9863869708 210 OAKDALE DR HILLSBOROUGH NC 27278-8754 4.44.B.19A RAY EMILY E 9863970241 118 OAKDALE DR HILLSBOROUGH NC 27278-8753 4.44.B.19C HAYNIE RUTH WARREN 9863879171 BOX 365 HILLSBOROUGH NC 27278-0365 4.44.B.19D HAYNIE ROBERT H JR & BEVERLY W 9863961606 2419 DALTON DR EFLAND NC 27243 4.44.B.19E 986396]785 4.44.B.19F 98638781.16 4.44.B.20 9863971293 4.44.B.20A 9863964502 4.44.B.20B 9863963812 4.44.B.22 9863974356 GAINEY ELEANOR JEAN RAY & JOHNNIE 118 OAKDALE DR HILLSBOROUGH NC 27278-8753 STANLEY RAY L JR & MARSHA 204 OAKDALE DR HILLSBOROUGH NC 27278-8754 ISAACS CLIFFORD C & BRENDA R ISAACS ] 12 OAKDALE DR HILLSBOROUGH NC 27278-8753 ISAACS CLIFFORD C & BRENDA R ISAACS 112 OAKDALE DR HILLSBOROUGH NC 27278-8753 ISAACS CLIFFORD C_ & BRENDA R ISAACS 112 OAKDALE DR HILLSBOROUGH NC 27278-8753 STATE EMPLOYEES CREDIT UN PO BOX 26807 1000 WADE AVE RALEIGH NC 27611-7665 D~1 PAGE 3 OF 3 TMBL OWNER OLDPIN ADDRESS OWNERZ CITY 8/11/2003 STATE ZIP 4.44.8.24 STATE EMPLOYEES CREDIT UN 4.44.8.25 STURDIVANT JUANITA S 9863965912 2401 OLD NC 86 HILLSBOROUGH NC 27278 4.44.826 9863965768 4.44.B.27 9863965688 4.44.8.28 9863966573 4.45..1 9873071422 4.45..2 9873263893 UNDERWOOD EDWARD LEON Sl 6518 SCHLEY RD HILLSBOROUGH NC 27278-7819 MILLER AUDREY S 24I 1 OLD NC 86 HILLSBOROUGH NC 27278 SMITH JAMES W 2417 OLD CH HILLSBOROUGH Rl HILLSBOROUGH NC 27278 ORANGE COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION DAVIS CHARLES W & JAMES CANTER DAVIS 718 GRAHAM ST RALEIGH NC 27605-1123 ~~ ~ fishier: Wendy Dixon I >ate Document No Document Type Transaction Type Amount 3/11/2003 Public Grantor: ~ Grantee: S 11 JC1,R5 40.00 Public Total: 40.00 Fee Total: 40.00 Orange County Register of Deeds PO Boz 8181 Hillsborough, NC 27278 Receipt for Services Batch #: 2985 Date: 08/11/2003 Time: 03:46:05 PM I CHECK 10130 Payment Payment Total: 40.00 40.00 Page 1 of 1 OCT 14 2003 1008 FR ADMINISTRRTION tS19839555.5-r i u Uar~ 1 cirn ~ n i ~..~ ...`.. __ ~o~nt P o~ ® ~or~x2714 ~AC~ 148 t ~. ~ti1~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 17 ~ ~~ ~~/ ~ ~4~t~ ~~`o~,o Joyce H. Pearson Register of Deeds Urange Couxa.~y Noah Carolina State of North Carolina, County of Orange The foregoing Certificate/s of Penny S. Flake, Notary/Notaries Public for thte Desi~Zeated Governmental units islare certified to he correct. See filing certifeate hereia. This ds~y September 17, 2002 1 TO~CCE H. P1rARSUN, REGISTER OF DEEDS $y= ~ f ~ Deputy/ _ t Register ofi Aeeds ~=~ TOTAL PAGE.05 ** sip $D~JK2~~.4 PAGE j.~:~ a~~ STATE OF NOF.TH CAROLINA COIIN'Y'X OF ORANGE I, ~~hvl,tj 5 ~ ~~~- ,Notary Public of the aforesaid County and State, do hereby certify that GART~i B_ HAAS AND WIFE, KELLY 5. HAAS personally appeared before me this day and acknowledged the due execution of the foregoing instrument. witness my hand and seal, ~.k~.s the ~q~N- day of ~_~„ 2002. / ) n ~2 . My commission expires: C STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA ~ r '~ ~ ~3- I~. ~~nnu ~. FlQ_k~ ,Notary Pu tic o e aforesaid County and State, do hereby certify that HAMS C_ HAAS, AND WIFE, SHEILA C. HAAS personally. appeared before me this day and acknowledged the due execution of the foregoing instrument. Witness my hand and seal, this the lG~ day of , 2002. NOTARY PUBLIC My commission expires : ~/~gJac~ti; STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA COUNTY OF ORANGE / P~-Y~yy s r1+p~, • 9~ f}~}~~ e<,, ~ ~;1 _, ~~fh-u.- ~J• r~![.lf,e ,Notary Public of the aforesaid County and State, do hereby certify that DARIEAN G_ HAAS, DzVORCED .personally appeared before me this day and acknowledged the due execution of the foregoing instrument- Witness my nand and seal, .this the I urt~7 day of ~i~(r.~, 2b02_ ,~ ~f`/_ TARP PUBLIC O ~ My commission expires . y-,~.q 19oc~ ~ b~a '~'o `-'' -k,4,r.*#ff~k;fff~f}f*a~~*+;fft~t,Ff~#f~.,tf~f.tft~rs~+t,c~txx,r,rx,i:t~t*- Y ~tG~~~,tr~t STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA m ~~~ '` ~ ~ COUNTY OF ORANGE no, c . ~: r ~h~ T • ~~.h.-LU S - r ~G•!~- .Notary Pub " he aforesaid County d State, do hereby certify that INGA K. H~,AS, SEPERATED personally appeared before me this day and acknowledged the due execution of the foregoing instrument- Witness my hand and seal, the (p~~7 day of `~, 2002. ~- ni NU'FARY PUBLI ~T' 'O My commission expires: ~ f /1.q /apa~ t`~ a N `~~i RE\HAAS . GWD ~ p y .Q ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~/ Of;~1iGS ^_auNTT Nc iz og!~7/2002 t. s ~ ~~~~~ ~ C~'.' j' ~%CI a T27f GA FILEL' 17 gEP 20~~, at ~4:19c39pm 4~ 4 PAGE ~ bJOi(~7~ X04 k X71 ~ ~ Page 1 ~+5 -- ? 48 , . Joyce H. Rearson Register rf C~e_d~, Grange County, ~V. C, GENERAL FIARRAN'7'Y DEED Prepared by: D _ MICHAEL PARKER ~~"~==='-- '~~~~ ~~~~ • ~ .Return to : Grantee : SECLL. I GaQb ~i}141t1 t~t~e, ~ `9GG ~ 7G/! NQRTH CAROLINA ORANGE COUNTY THIS GENERAL WARRANTY DEED, made and entered into this the JO~t~.j~ day of September, 20Q2, by and between, V. ERTCH EAAS AND WxFE, CHRISTY L. HAAS, GARTH H. HAAS AND WIFE, KELLY 5_ SAAS, HAMS C _ HAAS AND WIFE, SHEILA C _ HAAS AND DARIEAN G . HAAS , DIVORCED AND INGA !C. HAAS, SSPE'R.A-TED, Parties of the Fzrst Pa7~t, hereinafter referred to as "GRANTORS", and STATE EMYLOYL'1ES CREDIT UNIDN, Parties of the Second Part, hereinafter referred to as "GRANTEES", W Y T N E S S E T H That the said Grantors, for and in consideration of the sum of TEN DOLLARS ($lo,DO) to her in haled paid and other good and ~craluable considerations, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, has and by these presents does-grant, bargain, sell and convey unto the Grantees in fee simple all that certain tract ar parcel of land located in~Hillsborough Township, orange County, North Carolina and being more particularly described as follows: PIN #986.3-97-51.x2 TM 4.44.B_24 BEING-ALL of Lots 62, 63.64,.65, 78A anc~ 78B of Gray W. Lloyd Property according to survey and plat of F:M. Carlisle,. C: E_, dated Jan,uazy 14,.1949 and recorded in Plat Book 5, Page 110 of the orange County Registry to which plat reference is hereby made for a more fiarticular description of the same, TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the aforesaid tract or parcel o€ land Ut.l 14 GCl!'JJ lU'•U'( rK HUI'I11Y151 RHItui• ~~~.--.r~~-----~ _ __.._ so~K2`~14 Face 14~ ~~~ TO HAVE ANb TO HOLD the aforesaid tract or parcel of land .and -all privileges and appurtenances thereto belonging to the Grantee in fee simple. And the Grantors covenants with the Grantee that the Grantors is seized of the premises in fee simple, has .the right to convey the. same in fee simple, that title is marketable and free and clear of all encumbrances, and that the Grantor will warrant and defend the title against the lawful alarms of .all persons whomsoever except for the exceptions, if any, set forth above. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Grantors has hereunto se hazxds and seals ( the day and ye r first ov itten . • (SEAL) V. gRZCB HA85 1 ~~ ' {SEAL) C STY~~ L ..~ S / `'l~ .~~~ i'F..~' (SEA]'} .~ _ GARTH 8~ BAAS '. ~~i (3EAL) Y S. S' ~h~ C . 1-~cc, ~ cs~.) 51~ILA C _ AAAS ~~ c5~.) gaars c . aAns ts~AL) D F.AN G . HAAS • D~ ~/.f~ '.~~ t~~y~ ~ (SEAL) . INCA K. HAAS *~-r*~~c,r~~r***,E+~~~~~~~i,rftfii+~~~ **,~w***f*~~tftfff#tff#*}f~tt~fft~ STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA COUNTY OF ORANGE I, ~{ ,~,y~y~,uj. ~ ,Notary Public of the afores~.id County and State, do hereby certify -that V. ERICH HAAS AND WIFE, CFRISTY L. FIP.AS personally appeared before me this day and acknowledged the due execution of the foregoing instr ent. . Witness my hand and seal, this the1f~day of =~-, zoos _ My commission expires:4'~~~~'Ob~ PUBLI O .~.o ls+l ~ v E :2 ~ v {~~: ~1C ~'BRIEN/ATKINS Associates, P.A. ~ FIELD REPORT Architecture/Engineering Landscape Architecture/Planning Interior Design P.O. Box 12037 - Research Triangle Park, NC 27709 919/941-9000 TO: Larry Bennett-. LT Bennett Construction Robert -_Bennett Landscape and Maintenance • THE FOLLOWING WAS NOTED: Parkinct Lot Expansion ~~~ DATE: 10/29/03 JOB NO. 2001092 PROJECT Wake Forest Operations Center -parking lot LOCATION 3110 Wake Forest Road CONTRACTOR OWNER LT Bennett SECU WEATHER TEMP- TIME Fair 68 8:30 am no~ccw~r w-r ~rrt. Robert Bennett Jay Smith, O/A 1. Redbuds in middle parking aisle and southern edge flagged, follow up on condition in spring. Specimens requiring replacement to be finalized in spring at 1yr inspection. 2. Grass is 90-95% established in all disturbed areas, landscape crew has over-seeded where necessary. 3. Adjust rip-rap- at entry of Bio-Retention Area to protect the left bank. 4. Relocate shrubs from outflow of emergency spillway. 5. Adjust rip-rap in spillway necessary to protect outflow point. 6. Virginia Magnolia at north of parking lot is flagged, follow up condition in spring. 7. Some of the ground cover at edges of the beds appear to be killed by overspray from weed killer applied by grounds maintenance crew. 8. Temporary irrigation system to be drained to protect during winter. System to be removed at end of 1 yr warranty period. All punch list items were corrected from previous site inspection. CC: all attending Bilt O'Brien Jay Smith Robert Hall Patty Munns Signed:, (~~8 Town of ills Sirroe i75 T ~~ ~r October 27, 2003 Re: State Employees' Credit Union - ili and Ex ansion/Renovation Drive Up Fac ty p 2313.Old NC 86 Water & Sewer Review APPROVED AS NOTED Mr. Ehnaz D. Kapfer, PE TITANATLANTIC GROU_ P 5240 Green's Dairy. Road e ~1~1 ~~ r~ Dear Mr. Kapfer: I have reviewed the water and sewer utilities plans for the State Employees' Credit Union Drive- Up Facility and Expansion/Renovation dated August 7, 2003, and they are hereby Approved as Noted. The following comments must be addressed prior to construction (all comments are in reference to Sheet LA-3): 1. Backilow Prevention: A DCVA backflow preventer must be installed immediately following the water meter, above-ground with an insulated box cover,. Annual testing will be required of the customer, with testing data submitted to the Town. 2. Sanitary Sewer Profile: The length and percent grade of each section of gravity sewer must be shown on the sanitary sewer profile. 3. Sewer Bore & Jack/Encasement Pipe: The encasement pipe must be a minimum of 12" to provide adequate clearance for the 8" DI sewer pipe joints. Also, DIP is noted for the encasement pipe, however, steel encasement pipe is acceptable. 4. Water & Sewer Connection Fees: An invoice is attached, which details the fees required far connection to the To«~n water and sewer system. The Water Capital. Facilities Fee is not assessed since the existing water service will be utilized.. Further instnictions on the Town. requirements during and after construction can be found in the "Checklist for Approval and Acceptance of Utilities Projects", which is available from my office and on the Town website (www.ci.hillsborou~h.nc.us). The permit application to NCDWQ for the sewer extension should be prepazed for signature by the Town Manager, Eric J. Peterson. The Hillsborough Utility Inspector (Russell Lloyd, 919-201-1432) should be notified prior to construction, and prior to any testing of the water and sewer facilities to be installed: As always, you may notify my office if you are unable to reach the inspector. . l0l East Orange Street P.O. Box 429 -Hillsborough, North Carolina 27278 1 ~WI1 of ills h s:~ ~~s, g To: STATE EMPLOYEES' CREDIT UNION, 2313 Old N From: Kenneth P. Keel, PE, Town Engineer/IJtilities Director INVOICE i~"rae7 6, Hillsborough, NC 27278 .~w~.,. ~.,_.....,. _., ---- Subject: Water 8z Sewer .Connection Fees - SECU DRIVE-UP FACILITY AND. EXPANSION/RENOVATION, 2313 Old NC 86, Hillsborough, NC The following is a list of water & sewer charges for the connection of the SECU Drive-Up Facility and Expansian/Renovation Project, at the southwest quadrant of the traffic circle in Hampton Pointe development, in Hillsborough, NC (OUT-OF-TOWN: Water Capital Facilities Fee (EXISTING 3/."wafer service) N/C Sewer Capital Facilities Fee (New sewer service connection} $ 634.36 Water Lateral Fee (EXISTING 3/." wafer service) N/C Sewer Lateral Fee (to be installed by Developer} N/C New S/8 " x 3/ "Water Meter _ . $ 300.00 Water/Sewer Review Fees ~ 600.00 TOTAL = $ 1,534.36 An additional deposit will. be required for each account prior to initiation of service.. Please remit payment, payable to the Town of Hillsborough, to .137 North Churton Street (PO Box 429), Hillsborough, NC 27278. Payment is required. prior to connection to the Town Water & Sewer System. Quoted fees are valid through June 30, 2004, and are subject to change if not paid by that date. Please notify the Town Engineer (Kenny. Keel, 919-732-1270 x75) or Utilities Inspector (Russell LIoyd, 919-201-1432) prior to start of utilities construction. Cc: Sherry Carter, Finance Director File 27616 ..,..,, 101 East Orange Street - P.O. Box 429 • Hillsborough, North Carolina 27278 . _ ___ ... .. ,. ,~ n+n nii nnnn QJQ Town of j~ills gh ~. ~ ~-- _ .~..~j -. ~_ .~ ~ , __ ~. F.~_ REVISED INVOICE To: STATE EMPLOYEES' CREDIT UNION, 2313 Old NC 86, Hi sboro . From: Kenneth P.. Keel,_PE,_Town Engineer/[Jtilit_ies Direc_to_r _ '_ .Date: October 28, 2003 VYdter QL ~7CWCC l.VlulGGl~VU rcw - viw ia~a~i:ra~a~~ti EXPANSION/RENOVATION, 2313 Old NC 86, Hillsborough, NC 27278 **The original invoice dated October 27 2003 contained an error in the description of the project location This description has been corrected. and the fees shown are unchanged ** The following is a list of water & sewer charges for the connection of the SECU Drive-Up Facility and Expansion/Renovation Project, adjacent to the existing State Employees' Credit Union facility at 2313 Old NC 86, in Hillsborough, NC (OUT-OF-TOWN): Water Capital Facilities Fee (EXISTING 3/. "water service) N/C Sewer Capital Facilities Fee (New sewer service connection) $ 634.36 Water Lateral Fee (EXISTING 3/. "water service) N/C Sewer Lateral Fee (to be installed by Developer) N/C New S/8"x 3/~" Water Meter $ 300.00 Water/Sewer Review Fees $ 600.00 TOTAL = $ 1,534.36 An additional deposit will be required for each account- prior to initiation of service. Please remit payment, payable to the Town of Hillsborough, `to 137 North Churton Street (PO Box 429), I-fillsborough, NC 27278. Payment is required prior to .connection to the Town Water & Sewer System. Quoted fees are valid through June 30, 2004, and are subject to change if not paid by that date. Please notify the Town Engineer (Kenny Keel, 919-732-1270 x75) or Utilities Inspector (Russell Lloyd, 919-201-1432) prior to start of utilities construction. Cc: Sherry-Carter, Finance Director ElmarD. Kapfer, PE, Titan Atlantic Group, 5240 Green's-Dairy Road, Raleigh, NC 27616 Jay W. Smith, O'Brien Atkins Associates, PA, PO Box 12037, RTP, NC 27709 Eddie Kirk, Orange County Planning Dept. . File IOI East Orange Street • P.O. Box 429 • Hillsborough, North Carolina 27278 919_7.?2.199n Fnr a7Q_RQ~_2?Q/1 1 ~ STOPIVIWATER MANAGEMENT REPORT i ~~ ~ for STATE. EMPLOYEE'S CREDIT UNION HILLSBOROUGH, NORTH CAROLINA .. . SUBMITTED TO: O'Brien Atkins Associates i P.O. Boz 12037 Research Triangle Park, NC 27709 PREPARED FOR: NCDENR North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources Raleigh Regional Office Division of Land Resources ' Land Quality Section 1628 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699 SUBMITTED BY: TITAN ~.~.~~l~~i~~c ~~'~r~~~~i~ A lit Company 5240 GREEN'S DAIRY ROAD RALEIGH, NC 27602 ``,~<<iurrtUi~~~~' ~ OFD O "~~ ~~~~~ 4 26TS9 .,,~qR t3 . K~.~` ` I~ ~~~i~~rntt~~N~ August 8,.2003 ~~2 Hillsborough State Employees Credit Union Stormwater Report Project # 70994252 Project Overview The State Employee's Credit union intends to increase the size of its facility and parking area at the Hillsborough, North Carolina location at the comer of Old Hillsborough -Chapel Hill and Oakdale Roads. The project will involve converting a new piece of land into a parking azea with a small building to service a new drive through teller system Methodology Water Quantity - - Tliis hydraulic study was preformed using HydroCAi3®6: -This-is- a software package hy-Applied- - - Microcomputer Systems, which can be used to model a variety of watersheds, ponds and a v ereo . wasp r~xi i'i'R-5~ii~~ivcfinsgrap~M~dr Please refer to the attached sununary (Appendix A) for the peak flows and water levels and to the attached calculations for details. Wafer Quality For nitrogen runoff analysis, the two lots were combined. and treated as one large area. The nitrogen was calculated using method 1 from the Orange County Stormwater ordinance for Lands within the Neuse River Basin. Site Description The existing credit union is on 2.26 acres, consisting of a building and parking area that takes up most of the site. A detention pond is located near Oakdale Road, which drains into a culvert beneath Oakdale Road. The new property is to the south of the existing building, consisting of a few small buildings, driveways, fencing and a house. The new land will have a small building for new drive through tellers, and additional parking. Proposed Stormwater Management The existing pond and Stormwater system will remain in place, with the addition of only one yard inlet. The quantity of Stormwater through the existing system will increase slightly with the addition of some runoff from the new site. The pond is capable of handling a large increase in quantity while still detaining the runoff from the site. The current pipe system can accommodate the slight increase in flow, but would not be able to .handle the runoff from the whole new property. Therefore a separate Stormwater detention system for the new development was designed. The new property will decrease runoff quantity to the predevelopment values through an underground detention system beneath the proposed pazking area. This underground detention system will consist of 400' of 36" HDPE piping. The outflow of the detention system will be controlled through the cap at the end of the pipes. A 5" pipe will restrict the outflow in the two year storm to the pre-construction levels, and the cap will be open at the top for free outflow in lazger storm events. Because the post-development Nitrogen. values will be less than 10 pounds per acre per yeaz, the owners plan to make a payment toward .the wetland mitigation fund and not implement any nutrient reduction practices. The nitrogen calculations can be seen in Appendix B: A small azea will not be directed to the stormwater detention system because of the elevation differences. This water will be directed to the effluent pipe from the detention system, and the water will be directed to a rip-rap dissipater pad. The value of this flow has been taken into consideration in water quantity analysis. 08/08/03 Page 1 Hillsborough State Employees Credit Union Stormwater Report Project # 70994252 Computer Modei Lnput for Watershed Areas Through the use of HydroCAD, many aspects of the effluent flaw were analyzed. The program requires certain input regarding the characteristics of the land. The input required is: 1. Design Storm information a. Length of storm b. Depth of rainfall c. Time increment for analysis (dt) 2. Time of Concentration 3. Composite Areas with Corresponding SCS Runoff Curve Numbers esrgn torms An SCS Type II 24 Hour rainfall distribution was assumed for the storm analysis, with 0.01-hour increments. A rainfall of 3.00 inches was used for the one-year storm analysis. For the 10-year storm, 5.38 inches of rainfall was used. Time. of Concentration The time of concentration route was identified as the longest path that water would flow to reach the pond. Each route was broken into two segments: sheet flow and shallow concentrated flow.. TR55 methods were used to calculate the sheet and shallow concentrated flow times, through the HydroCAD program, Con~osite Areas and Corresponding- SCS Runoff Curve Numbers The composite areas were entered into HydroCAD using measurements taken from the design drawings. The corresponding SCS curve numbers were selected based on the surface composition, and can be seen in the HydroCAD reports included in Appendix A. Summary After careful consideration of the pre and post development conditions at the Hillsborough State Employees Credit Union, discussions with the Orange County Inspections Department, Landscape Architects from O'Brien Atkins, and after taking concerns for the surrounding watershed into consideration, the proposed stormwater plan was developed. This plan incorporates the existing stornrwater structures and the addition of a new underground detention system 08/08/03 Page 2 4~4 Appendix A HydroCAD results HitisSECU Type 1l 24-hr Rainfall=3.00" Prepared by Titan Atlantic Page 1 HvdroCADC~ 6 00 s/n 002026 ©1986-2001 Applied Microcomputer Systems 3/17/2003 Time span=0.00-24.00 hrs, dt=0.01 hrs, 2401 points Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Type II 24-hr Rainfall=3.00" Reach routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method -Pond routing by Stor-Ind method Subcatchment 1S: New Land Pre-Developed Tc=21.3 min CN=77 Area=60,267 sf Runoff= 1.53 cfs 0.123 of Subcatchment 2S: Runoff without bypassed land . ~ - - - ~ - - Tc=5.0 min CN=87 Area=48,003 sf Runoff= 3.51 cfs 0.160 af. Pond 1 P: 400'.36" underground storage Peak Storage= 2,076 cf Inflow= 3.51 cfs 0.160 of Primary= 0.91 cfs 0.159 of Outflow= 0.91 cfs 0.159 of Runoff Area = 2.486 ac Volume = 0.282 of Average Depth =1.36" ,~, ti,F HiIIsSECU Type ll 24-hr Rainfall=3.00" Prepared by Titan Atlantic Page 2 HvdroCAD~ 6.00 s/n 002026 ©1986-2001 Applied Microcomputer Systems 3/17/2003 Subcatchment 1S: New Land Pre-Developed Runoff = 1.53 cfs @ 12.15 hrs, Volume= 0.123 of Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Time Span= 0.00-24.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Type II 24-hr Rainfall=3.00" Area (sf) CN Description 8,725 98 impervious a1,aQZ ~4 ^~o~s _ -- 60,267 77 Weighted Average Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 19.5 200 0.0315 0.2 Sheet Flow, Grass: Dense n= 0.240 P2= 3.60" 0.8 150 0.0413 3.3 Shallow Concentrated Flow, Unpaved Kv= 16.1 fps 0.2 50 0.0550 4.8 Shallow Concentrated Flow, Paved Kv= 20.3 fps 0.8 90 0.0678 1.8 Shallow Concentrated Flow, Short Grass Pasture Kv= 7.0 fps 21.3 490. Total Subcatchment 1 S: New Land Pre-Developed Hydrograph Plot h v 3 0 . . 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 2~ - Runoff Time (hours) o~~ HiIIsSECU Type !I 24-hr Rainfall=3.00" Prepared by Titan Atlantic Page 3 HydroCAD® 6.00 s/n 002026 ©1986-2001 Applied Microcomputer Systems 3/17/2003 Subcatchment 2S: Runoff without bypassed land Runoff - 3.51 cfs @ 1'1.96 hrs, Volume= 0.160 of Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SGS, Time Span= 0.00-24.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Type N 24-hr Rainfall=3.00" . .._ _Area.(sf)----CN--Descript(or~_------------....._..... .__ '.~~s-3 QR Paved parking & roofs LL,VVV ~O - - ~ - -_ 22,350 74 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG C 48,003. 87 Weighted Average Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min} (feet) (ft/ft) (ftlsec) (cfs) 5.0 Direct Entry, . Subcatchment 2S: Runoff without bypassed land Hydrograph Plot 0 o ,; n 1 2 3 4 5 R 7 R 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 1 R 19 70 21 22 23 2. - Runoff Time (hours) ~~~8 HiIIsSECU Type ll 24-hr Rainfall=3.00" Prepared by~Titan Atlantic Page 4 HydroCAD® 6.00 s/n 002026 ©1986-2001 Applied Microcomputer Systems 3/17/2003 Pond 1 P: 400' 36" underground storage Inflow = 3.51 cfs @ 11.96 hrs, Volume= 0.160 of Outflow = 0.91 cfs @ 12.09 hrs, Volume= 0.159 af, Atten= 74%, Lag= 7.4 min Primary = 0.91 cfs @ 12.09 hrs, Volume= 0.159 of Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-24.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Peak Elev= 642.13' Storage= 2,076 cf ---~g~f ls~r~~„~~-ir~ae~-9:o -,T,~„~leui-a~cl-fe~ ~~l-a~-(a-0(1-°~°-cif-i~#tew; -- Storage and wetted areas determined by Conic sections. Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store Wet.Area (feet) (sq-ft) (cubic-feet) (cubic-feet) (sq-ft) 640.00 0 0 0 0 640.25 663 55 55 663 640.50 895 194 249 896 640.75. 1,038 241 491 1,042 641.00 1,130 271 762 1,139 641.25 1,182 289 1,051 1,199 641.50 1,200 298 1, 348 1,234 641.75 1,182 298 1,646 1,270 642.00 1,130 289 1, 935 1, 330 642.25 1,038 271 2,206 1,426 642.50 895 241. 2,447 1,572 642.75 663 194 2,641 1,805 643.00 0 55 2,697 2,468 Primary OutFlow (Free Discharge) L1=Culvert ~2=Orifice/Grate 3=Sharp-Crested Rectangular Weir # Routing Invert Outlet Devices _ 1 Primary 640.00' .18.0" x 105.0' long Culvert RCP, square edge headwall, Ke= 0.500 Outlet Invert= 637.00' S= 0.0286'/' n= 0.014 Cc= 0.900 2 Device 1 640.00' 5.0" Vert. Orifice/Grate C=0.600 3 Device 1 642.20' 2.6' long x 0.5' high Sharp-Crested Rectangular Weir 2 End Contraction(s) HillsSECU Type 1l 24-hr Rainfall=3.00" Prepared by Titan Atlantic Page 5 HydroCAD~ 6 00 s/n 002026 O 1986-2001 Applied Microcomputer Systems 3/17!2003 Pond 1 P: 440' 36" underground storage °Hydrograph Plot ~. , -Inflow • 3:~.~. : ~ - Pnmary -- - _.. _ L ~. , , , , ~ , - - - o LL , , -,;.. 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 1~7 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Time (hours) ~~~ Hi11sSECU Type 1124-hr Rainfall=5.38" Prepared by Titan Atlantic Page 1 _H_ydroCAD® 6.00 s/n 002026 ©1986-2001 Applied Microcomputer S stems 3/17/2003 Mme span=0.00-24.00 hrs, dt=0.01 hrs, 2401 points Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Type I! 24-hr Rainfall=5.38" Reach routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method -Pond routing by Stor-Ind method Subcatchment 1S; New Land Pre-Developed Tc=21.3 min CN=77 Area=60,267 sf Runoff= 4.38 cfs 0.338 of Subcatchment 2S: Runoff without bypassed land Tc=5.0 min CN=87 Area=48,003 sf Runoff= 7.59 cfs 0.360 of Pond 1P: 400' 36".underground storage Peak Storage= 2,691 cf Inflow= 7.59 cfs 0.360 of Primary= 7.57 cfs 0.359 of Outflow= 7.57 cfs 0.359 of Runoff Area = 2.486 ac Volume = 0.698 of Average Depth = 3.37" ~~~ HillsSECU Type l! 24-hr Rainfall=5.38" Prepared by Titan Atlantic ~ Page 2 H}„~~„r~ann ~ nn c/n 002026 ©1986-2001 Applied Microcomputer Systems 3/17/2003 Subcatchment 1 S: New Land Pre-Developed Runoff = 4.38 cfs @ 12.14 hrs, Volume= 0.338 of Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Time Span= 0.00-24.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Type {I 24-hr Rainfall=5.38" Area (sf) CN Description ~ _ 8,725 98 impervious 60,267 77 Weighted Average Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) _ 19.5 200 0.0315 0.2 Sheet Flow, Grass: Dense n= 0.240 P2= 3.60" 0.8 150 0.0413 3.3 Shallow Concentrated Ftow, Unpaved Kv= 16.1 fps 0.2 50 0.0550 4.8 Shallow Concentrated Flow, Paved Kv= 20.3 fps 0.8 90 0.0678 1.8 Shallow Concentrated Flow, Short Grass Pasture Kv= 7.0 fps 21.3 490 Total Subcatchment 4 S: New Land Pre-Developed Hydrograph Plot N V O 11. . n ~ i ~ ,. • r c -~ e 0 in 11 19 iZ id 1S 1R 17 7R 19 9n 71 4.36 cfs ~ i... -•--. - - - ~ --. -. - - --- - - - - - - .- •- --. . ; 1 7 ~ ~ ~ _ -. .._.- .- _ .. . . . . . .. .. .. . . - Runoff ~~~ HiIIsSEGU ~ Type lI 24-hr Rainfa/l=5.38" Prepared by Titan Atlantic Page 3 HydroGAD® 6.00 s/n 002026 ©1986-2001 Applied Microcomputer Systems 3/17/2003 Subcatchment 2S: Runoff without bypassed land Runoff = 7.59 cfs @ 11.96 hrs, Volume= 0.360 of Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Time Span= 0.00-24.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Type 1124-hr Rainfall=5.38" Area.(sf) CN Description 3,653 98 Paved parking & roofs -- .22,350 ~ 74 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG C 48,003 87 Weighted Average Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description _ (min) (feet) (ftlft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 5.0 Direct Entry, Subcatchment 2S: Runoff without bypassed land Hydrograph Plot N U O LL i 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 R 9 1(] 11 19 T3 14 15 1R 17 1R ~o ~n ~~ ~~ ~~ ~, 7.59 cfs T -~ - - --- - - -- 3 -- -- .. _ -. _ . . 2 --- - - ~ - . - --- --•- - ~ - - - 1 ---- -- - ~ -- _ - Runoff - Time (hours) - - - - - • - • - -- - . __ -_ - =~ e3 Mi11sSECU Type 1124-hr Rainfall=5.38" Prepared by Titan Atlantic Page 4 HydroCADO 6.00 s/n 002026 ©1986-2001 Applied Microcomputer Systems 3/17f2003 Pond 1 P: 400' 36" underground storage Inflow = 7.59 cfs @ 11.96 hrs, Volume= 0.360 of Outflow = 7.57 cfs @ 11.96 hrs, Volume= 0.359 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.3 min Primary 7.57 cfs @ 11.96 hrs, Volume= 0.359 of Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-24.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Elev= 642.97'. Storage= 2,691 cf Storage and wetted areas determined by Conic sections Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store Wet.Area (feet} (sq-ft) (cubic-feet) (cubic-feet) (sq-ft) 640.00 0 0 0 0 640.25 663 55 55 663 640.50 895. 194 249 896 640.75 1,038 241 ~ 491 1,042 641.00 1,130 271 762 1,139 641.25 1,182 289 ~ 1,051. 1,199 641.50 1,200 298 1, 348 1,234 641.75 .1,182 298 1,646 1,270 642:00 1,130 289 1,935 1,330 642.25 1,038 271 2,206 1,426 642.50 895. 241 2,447 1,572 642.75 663 194 2,641 1,805 643.00 0 55 2,697 2,468 Primary OutFlow (Free Discharge) t-1=Culvert ~2=Orifice/Grate 3=Sharp-Crested Rectangular Weir # Routing Invert Outlet Devices 1 Primary 640.00' 18.0" x 105.0' long Culvert RCP, square edge headwall, Ke=.0.500 Outlet Invert= 637.00' S= 0.0286 '!' n= 0.014 Cc= 0.900 2 Device 1 640.00' 5.0" Vert. Orifice/Grate C= 0.600 3 Device 1 642.20'- 2.6' long x 0.5' high Sharp-Crested Rectangular Weir 2 End Contraction(sj '~: HiIIsSECU Type !! 24-hr Rainfall=5.38" Prepared by Titan Atlantic ~ Page 5 HydroCADO 6.00 sln 002026 ©1986-2001 Applied Microcomputer Systems 3/17/2003 Pond 1 P: 400' 36" underground storage Hydrograph Plot 8 ~ - - ~7.57cfs' - - -- - - ~- - - _ Inflow Primary 7 -~ -- . _ .. _- ..~--- - - - - - - 6 ~ .- --~ -- - - -.. _ 5 ~- - -- - - - ~- - -- -. . _ _ c 4 .. .._ _ - - - - .- ---• - -- - -- ~ ~- - - - - w 3 ~ - ---~~ -- - - --- -- -- -• ----- ---- -- - -- - --- - - - -- -- -- 2 - - ~ _... .. - - - - - .. 1 ~ - - -- -.- -- - -- - ----------- -- ---- - - -- ._ _... _.._ 0 .. . 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Time (hours) ~~~ Appendix S Nitrogen Calculations ~~b Hillsborough Credit Union Project #66-20852 ' Combined Land Pre-Development Land Cover Area TN-Coeff. TN Export TN Export TN Exp. TN Exp. TN Exp. (acres) Qbsladyr) (Ibslyr) (Ibs/arJyr) (Wet Pond) (Wetland) (Rip. Buffer} Undisturbed open-space 1.52 0.6 0.9 Managed open space 1.06 1.2 1.3 Impervious 1.04 21.2 22.0 Total 3.62 24.2 5.0 4.0 4.7 $1,694 $494. $1,294 Combined Land Posf-Development Land Cover Area TN-Coeff. TN Export TN Export TN Exp. TN Exp. TN Exp. aces a yr a yr on e Undisturbed open space 0.74 0.6 0.4 Managed open space 1.32 1.2 1.6 Impervious 1.56 21.2 33.1 Total 3.62 35.1 7.3 5.8 6.8 $4,387 $2,649 $3,808 1:160\66 -Civil Dept\Projects1200216...\D. StormwaterlNitrogen __ i:07 FA7C 919 941 9006 03rien/Atkins Kssactates, PA Arch itecture/~ng ineering Landscape ArchltecturelPlanning Interior Design ~r vuc r~ :J' F'fi l _ _ _ _ .-- --- t~B~~nAt~Ctr~~ z i :l 2103 Eddie Kirk orange County Planning Department Hillsborough, NC 2727$ Re: .State Employees Credit Union- Office Addition and Remote Teller Drive-Through Vtx. Kirk, Thank you for your time in reviewing-this project. We have. reviewed the existing configuration, as approved in 1998 by Orange County, and stzived to maintain the same level of appearance in our proposed plans for expansion. We believe that our proposed site . renovations, although moderate in scale, will have a xzainimal impact to the existing conditions of as found at this intersection: We, working directly with the Credit Union, have tried to actively address any possible : ~.~w~ n s that result from our plans aS follows: 1. Landscaping: We are proposing, with input from the Planning staff to add to the appearance of both the existing building and new remote teller office. a. We are proposing large beds of evergreen screening along Clld NC 86. b. We are replacing all damaged landscape around the existing building, restoring it to the original design intent. c. We are proposing tl}e replanting of the existing slope !orated between the teller office and the main building. d. We are preserving several large trees that are found on the new site. e. We are continuing to preserve the large existing trees found in front of the main building at the intersection of Old NC 86 and Oakdale Drive. 2. Parking= Additional pazlcing is being provided to better serve this branch office at peak hours. This parking is beneficial to the site because: a. This will help recover drive aisles lost to parallel parking by members and staff. b. Provide better emergency service access c. Allow for the future cross connection to function more effectively due to a better internal traffic circulation. OBRIEN/ATAINS Post Office Sax 12037 Durf-am 919!941-9D00 Research Trfar~gle Park, NC 27709 l2alalgh a181755-10.2 Chapel HiN 919!968-4571 ocumsnt: D~igr- t~[drrdtidn 1Vov12 2003.doc i1ii3/Oa THU 11:07 FAg 919 941 9006 U!S![1L'1V/AlAl1VJ ~i i b ^.~zs z of 3 =~^ted Wednesday, November 12, 2003 3. Ariveway 1VJ(od~ifications: With this addition we are proposing the redevelopment o£ the entrance and exits to the site in order to provide relief to Old NC 86. a_ Anew £ull service drive is proposed appmximate]y 4601f from the intersection of Old NC 86 and Oakdale Drive. i.,~rt,~.a,-ouldbP a-az~e ~ane_an ~nd~ ~aneS out~sight~nd~n~l_eft turning lane) ii. This allows for a better stacking condition for those members that are wanting to make a left turn movement from Old NC 86 into the site while allowing the commuters that want to access .Oakdale drive, to have a less impeded approach further down at the signalized intersection. b. The existing full service drive is being converted to a limited access drive that will only allow a right in-right out movement along Old NC 86 4, Utilities: The minor increase to Sewer and Water needs has been reviewed and approved by the Town afHillsborough. Acopy of the approval letter was submitted with the application. 5. Propexty Value: The building value will increase substantially further. increasing the tax value ofthe prope>sty and surrounding properties. Total estimated value of building additions is to be approx. $350,000 and the remote teller off ce to be approx. $100,000 added to the existing property's cutTent value_ 6. Environmentally sound: The credit union as a financial institution, has a low impact on the environment in terms of pollution, noise, .and waste. We are proposing to handle all new storm water impact by the use of an underground detention system. This system allows for our site to meet county and state requirements while preserving the visual appearance of the Old NC 86 corridor. Without this system, we would have to utilize an above ground pond that would be visible from the street. '1, pppearancc: All proposed work is to match the existing building in terms of materials and finishes. The remote teller office will utilize similar materials as well a. Both the additions and the remote teller office will bE below 30' tall. Section/Eleyations have been provided in the packets illustrating these heights. b. Continuation of quality facility maintenance and landscape maintenance far the site. ~~ ~:.?rP are only a few. concerns that we are not able to meet fully with these additions and ask for relief from the Planning.staff and County Cvmanissioners given the Credit Union's positive influence to the area and long standing relationship. These issues are reflected in our request far a change in zoning: Document: Desi~rs Narratlon_Nov12-2003.doe .'. =~•' 11:07 FAg 919 941 9006 OBRIEN/ATgINS [004 - ~ =~ e7 Page 3 of 3 Panted Wednesday, November 12, 2003 _ 1. 1~'laxinnurn ~3uaXdiutg ~exglat: Although none of the proposed additions exceed . the 30' limitation as required in the zoning code, the existing building is 35'. We ask for this condition to be ~coepted as apre-existing condition in this case and not have it impact our current petition. - ~--~te~ar-d-~ec~~r-e~x~ 'lr~the existing facility to remain a conforming structure by relaxing the buffer requirements to what is already provided, 50+' of heavily planted buffering. 3. Maximum Building Square footage: The ordinance limits buildings to 5000 gsf an tracts of 2 acres in the EDD. We are proposing 2 additions and a remote facility for a total of +/- 8000 gsf on 3.25 acres of land_ 'We request that our larger site be used as a means to allow for tie increase in building square footage. We are actively pursuing a work session with NCDOT and the County Transportation planner to discuss our driveway plans and .request that we be kept on the agenda for the council meeting by xxtalcing ~ICDOT appravai a.canditian-of approval far the special use permit. We feel that we are presenting a plan that represents a positive impact to the surrounding p*ouerty owners and to this area of Hillsborough and drange Caunty and hope to work with the Flanning Department and Board of Commissioners on making this a reality. Sincerely, ~'F,IFNIA•ricrNS ASSOCIATES, FA Jonathan Parsons Jep Attachments: 3 pages following cc: !'VVS, W1,U, Robert Hall, Tyreta LeCates, Randell Welborne. .Document. T~esign NaRatfon_Nov12-20Q3.dac '11:3/03 T$Lt 11:08 FAZ 919 943. 9006 OBRIEN/ATKIN5 0 005 l.ll L'1/'Lbb3 14: l7 329=672-:1921 RANDY KEMN' & aSSOC PIsGE 02103 lVlr. Jonathan Parsons Ol~r1Cl1/1~.tk1I1S .pL650C1atCS, PA :: C~~? SaUtl] IVtiam~i BOUlevard wham, NC 27703-8526 4aze-n wnay Hili a~,~ ~NL. Raleigh, North Carolina 27604 Phone: 919.s72S 7 7 5 Fax: 919.878.5416 November I2, 2003 Reference: State Fanplayees' Credit Union I3illsbora7~gh, North Carolina f J .Dear lvlr. Parsons: ;~:~~ey Kemp and Associates, Inc. (RKA) has eomplcted a preliminary. review of the ymposcd site plan for the expansionJrEnovation of the existing State bnmployees' Credit Union (SECU} in Hillsborough. $ased ors tl~e site plan, the existing ECU includes a i 4,811 square foot (s.f.} building with three dcive~-thi:ougta wiltdovvt; attd arse ds7ive-throv.~h A'fM. It is our understanding the existing building will be expanded an the north side and sc=.ztti side by s total of appmxirr~ately 2,523 a.f. to include storage space and a few aew atlices_ Zn addition; the existing drive-through, lanes will be relocated to the south side of j the property anal ome drive-through lane will be added, bringing the total number of drive- through lanes to four service lames plus one A~'M ]arts. The following comments are based on a preli~aunary review of trat£ic operations far the proposed "expansianlrenovations of the n%Aa `The new -site plan indicates the existing full-access. driveway on Old NC 86 will be restrioted to right-in/right-out mavecnents only, while a new full-access. driveway will be provided on Old 1VC 86 approximately 4G0 feet fromt the Old NC 8~/Oakdale Road intersee7xon. Yncrexsing the spacing between afull-access driveway and the "Old NC is6/Oakdale Road intersection is expected to provide safer and mare cf~cient access to and from the site, pardctil.arly for lel} turning vehicles from the site driveway and left tumirag vehicles into the site driveway from Old NC 86. These vehicles would not blacked by northbound queues on Old NC 8b at the i>Ytersecgon with Oakdale Road. _.eicwaing the drive-through vtiindaws to the south side of the property renataves the drive- ~rough vehicles circulating along the building, which- improves safety far pedestrian traffic between the building and parking areas. RAl,EIGH,NC - RICFiMONb,VA Oa THU 11.08 FA% 918 84I 9006 OBRIEN/ATSINS f~006 '".._ ' :u cnras t4: i / 'jl`~-fl72-3921 RF~ME~ .KEMP & ASSOC P4GE ~3/B3 Page 2 Mr. Jonathan Parsons '_+Iavember 12, 2003 The site plan indieaxes a stub-out will be provided along the southern boundary of the property to provide interconnectivity for future developtr,.ent. When future develapxnent occurs, it~ is recommended to provide stop control an the future development caffieetion and the SECLT internal roadway such that the inbound traffic fxazn Old 1~iC 86 has the right- o~ way. This should prevent inbov~ traffic from queuing back from the site driveway auto Old NC 86. ~s1~ A Traffic Itrigact Analysis ('Z7A) report was prepay by Kimley Horn and Associates, Inc. r~T-~~ in April 1997 far the ex~lstixie SBCi7 Based an the capacity atialvsis results in tlt~ ~'{.~~; ^~1 study intersections were expected to operate at acceptable levels of service under p.r.~.. peek-hour build out (1998) cauditions. Unless significant traffic growth has accurreci. in the study area since 1998, all study intersections would be expected. to operate at acceptable levels of service in 2003 with I'be expausiom/renavati.ons to the existing site. Although it is anticipated that thG SECU expansion and additional drive-through window" will inr±w~ce traffic generated by the site, the inorease In traffic is not expected' to be significant. Please tote that These comments are based an a preliminary review of the site plan and are =;~t based an our analysis results.. A mare detailed analysis of the trip generation and tersectian operations would bt: necessary to validate .the preceding comments and observations. If you have any questz4ns, please contact me at (919) 872-OQ-80 x 110. Sizicerely, RA14fEY1~E11;f,P 8G ASSOCIATES, .i~YC Rynal G, Stephenson, P.E: '_' i' %/Oa MON 14:44 FAZ 919 i 32 6990 HP&FY-HILLSBOROGH ~ 002 ®~+ ~ • ~' • ' • " ~ i li w RING 5rstr••Er .~~ = ' +~ 1•iTl_LStiQRUl1C,11, NL 77278 Ull$. (419) 7:52-(ilUl f':\?~ (419) 732-bS14Q IiQWARD 1'1rRRY ~vr-.t(slri' ttp~ei~,~~n AND WALS'1"ON `~ ^urmber 17, 2U03 lie: State Employee°s Credit Union e-C 1 .A,itn: Lddie Kirk ~E~ Box 8181 Hillsborough, NC 2728 Dear Mr. Kirk, . have been a realtor in the Hillsborough area with Howard. Perry & Walston since 1991 and am fanuliar with the residential and commercial market With regard to the proposed addition io the exi5~ting Stale Employee's Credit Union, which has been in service at its current location since 1999, it is my opinion that this expansion would have np negative impact to the surrounding property values anal would have a positive effect on the local business community while increasing the ability of this branch to serve its members with a higher level of quality and efficiency. Sipcercly, r k for fi~,~~an,a~Yi ~utSs'ii. Each Office !s Inde~enden(ly Owned And Operated. ~n,ra,irh ~x,•,Y.~c.~n,i ~an~ 4e°~ sa •'' t V s" ~ 4 xa P C,tb Ctt~" ORANGE COUNTY EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT PO Box 8181 Hillsborough, NC 27278 Fire Marshal Hazardous Materials Team Disaster Response 9-I-1 Communications Dttrirtg Normal Business Hours.• 919-968-2050 9I9-644-3030 24 Hour Warning Porttf: 919-933-2600 9I9-732-SI61 Busrziess Fax Machrne: 919-968-4066 24-HourFaxMachirre: 919-967-9026 DIRECTOR Nick Waters nwaters(ct~,co. oranae.nc.us DEPUTY DIILECTOR/EMS C. Kent McKenzie kmckenzie(a~co.oranre.nc.us DEPUTY DIRECTOR/FIRE MARSHAL Mike Tapp mtapp~u,co.oran~e.nc.us DEPUTY DIRECTOR/COMMUMGATIONS Gwen Snowden. gsnowden(a~co.oran e~ nc•us ADMINISTKATIVE ASSISTANT Tammy Comar tcomar(a~co.oran eg nc.us U' c.6~ TO: .Eddie Kirk Orange County.Planning Department FROM: Mike Tapp N'~ Deputy Director/Fire Marshal RE: State Employees Credit Union Drive-Up Facility and Expansion/Renovation 231301dNC86 Hillsborough, NC DATE: November 5, 2003 We have completed the site plan review for the expansion and - renovation.project at the State Employees Credit Union, 2316 OId NC &6 and find the plans acceptable. If you need further information, please contact us. 11/07f2003 15:27 9197326403 ORANGE CO SHERIFF PAGE 01 ®e3`~ Office of the Qrange County Sheriff Lindy Pendergrass, Sheriff ?.O. Box 8181 - Marge L~t11b wiiussoftorx~H Hlllsbot~ugh, NG 27278 . 818 T82.816i/644-3E150 Novemi~r 7, 2p03 Eddie Krric, Planner II •~' R.r~d C~urrty planning ;,yam-F Revere Rd_ Hillsborough, NC 27278 Request from: O'Brien Atkins Associates PA Address: PO Box-12037 Research Triangle Park NG 27709 Site Name: State Employees credit Unian Site Address: Ofd NC 8~ and Oakdale Drive Bulk+ing Additions: Remote Teller Offit~ to accommodate 2-3 stgfF members Drive thru canopy to be replaced by several offices Relocation of driveway entrance Eddie, I received a le#ter from O'Brien Atkins, asking if we can provide law enforcement services for the above-proposed additions. We routinely patrol this area on a 2~4-hour '~~..=.~s: These additions will not require additional personnel nor equipment for us. ': a~ § ~ $lsp sending tt~a request r+sc~ived by me to you for your file. aespectfully, ~ i t~ ~.AL~` ~[. ~ - Lindy Pendergrass Orange County Sheriff GG: Jonathan Parsons t)`Brien Atkins ORANGE COUNTY PLANNING & INSPECTIONS DEPARTMENT Craig N. Benedict, AICP, Director d Current Planning ~n +,~ °: 306E Revere Road (919) 245-2575 ~ g P O Box 8181 (919) 644-3002 (FAx) - Hillsborough, www.co.orange.nc.us "'°~r~ ~s•~~"~ North Carolina, 27278 MEMORANDUM --.--- ~E COUNTI~P~Cp-NN1~Bi7/~R AND BOARD OF-COMMISSIONERS - FROM; ORANGE COUNTY PLANNING STAFF DATE: October 27, 2003 SUBJECT: PD-1-03 PLANNED DEVELOPMENT CLASS A SPECIAL USE PERMIT STATE EMPLOYEES CREDIT UNION GENERAL INFORMATION APPLICANT: State Employees Credit Union James C. Blaine 1000 Wade Avenue P.O. Box 27665 Raleigh, NC 27611-7665 STATUS OF APPLICANT: President REQUESTED ACTION: Rezoning from an Economic .Development District (ED-LO-1) to a Planned ~ Development -Economic Development -Linear Office District (PD-ED-LNR} zoning designation and approval of a "Class A° Special Use Permit .under .Section 8.8.23 (Planned Developments) of the Orange County Zoning Ordinance.. PURPOSE: To expand the existing building to 7,334 sq. ft., construct a 634 sq. ft. remote teller station with a new 2,000 sq. ft. canopy. EXISTING LAND USE AND ZONING: NORTH - Oakdale Drive.. SOUTH - Single Family Residence zoned ED-LO-1. EAST - Old NC 86. WEST - Single Family Residences zoned ED-LO-1. LAND USE PLAN: The Land Use Element of the Comprehensive Plan designates the area as Economic Development. Q~b FINDINGS OF THE ORANGE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT PERTAINING TO STATE EMPLOYEES CREDIT UNION APPLICATION: James C. Blaine -President of State Emplovees Credit Union Planned developments must comply with general and specific standards as set forth~in Article 8 for Special Uses as well as those set forth in Article 7 for Planned Developments. Article 8.2.1 b) requires written findings certifying compliance with the following: (1) Specific regulations governing individual Special Uses as set forth in Article 8.8. These regulations are divided into two (2) sections which include: (a- Application components; and (b) Specific standards for Planned Developments (Article 8.8.23 refers to Article 7 standards) and Special Uses (Article 8.2.4 and 6.29.2). (2) Other. requirements as set forth in the Hillsborough Area Economic Development Districts Design Manual 1 Listed below are the findings of the Orange County Planning Department regarding the application in question. The findings have been presented by Article and requirement to assist the Planning Board in its deliberations. ARTICLE 8.6 AND 8.8 -APPLICATION COMPONENTS ("Yes" indicates compliance• "No" indicates non-compliance) PLANNING STAFF RECOMMENDED EVIDENCE SUBMITTED PLANNING BOARD FINDINGS TO SUPPORT FINDINGS FINDINGS Ordinance Requirements 8.6 -Application submitted on forms. providing full and accurate description of proposed use., including location, appearance and operational characteristics. 8.8 a) -Twenty-six (26) copies of the site plan prepared by a registered N.C. land surveyor, architect, or engineer. 8.8 b) -Elevations of all proposed structures to be used in the development. 8.8 c) -A fee, as set by the Board of County Commissioners. _x_Yes No A complete application on Yes No appropriate forms. has been submitted. _x_Yes No .Twenty-six (26) copies of the Yes No site plan, prepared by Obrien Atkins Architects have been submitted. x Yes No Elevations. are shown on the Yes No plans. The State Employees Credit Union building and remote teller station are the only buildings proposed. _x Yes No The application fee has been Yes No paid. ~~ ~, ARTICLE 8.8.23 SPECIFIC STANDARDS FOR EVALUATION/PLANNED DEVELOPMENTS ("Yes" indicates compliance; "No" indicates non -compliance) Article 8.8.23 indicates that the application shat( comply with the applicable sections of Article 7 -Planned Developments ARTICLE 7 -SPECIFIC STANDARDS FOR EVALUATION/PLANNED DEVELOPMENTS ("Yes" indicates compliance; "No" indicates non-compliance) Ordinance Reouirements Article 7.4 indicates the application must first comply with all requirements specified in Article 20 -Amendments. Those requirements include: 20.3.2 a) Map showing affected property at scale of not .less than 1 " =100' nor more than 1"=20'. *20.3.2 b) Legal description of property. 20.3.2 c) Explanation of alleged error, if any, to be corrected by proposed amendment. 20.3.2 d) Changed conditions, if any, which make amendment reasonably necessary to promote public health, ..safety and general welfare. 20.3.2 e) Manner in which proposed amendment will carry out purpose and intent of adopted Comprehensive Plan. PLANNING STAFF RECOMMENDED EVIDENCE SUBMITTED PLANNING BOARD FINDINGS TO SUPPORT FINDINGS FINDINGS x Yes No Site plan provided at a scale Yes No of 1"=20'. x Yes No The legal description was Yes No - - provided. Yes No N/A - No error alleged.. Yes No N/A x N/A Yes No N/A -The property is zoned N/A x Economic Development District-LO-1. The proposed zone is PDED-LNR. A Planned Development Special Use Permit is required since ,several requirements can't be met. x Yes No The application indicates that Goal Six of the Comprehensive Plan encourages the promotion of economic development which emphasizes employment, meeting local needs while preserving the character of communities and protecting the natural environment. Goal Nine also encourages the provision of water and sewer lines. Yes No N/A Yes No Q~~ 3, ARTICLE 7 -SPECIFIC STANDARDS FOR EVALUATION/PLANNED DEVELOPMENTS ("Yes" indicates compliance; "No° indicates non -compliance) (continued) PLANNING STAFF RECOMMENDED EVIDENCE SUBMITTED PLANNING BOARD FINDINGS TO SUPPORT FINDINGS FINDINGS Ordinance Requirements Article 4.2 identifies the criteria which will .normally be used to determine the application of a zoning district designation. The applicant has applied for a Planned Development-Economic Development designation. The criteria for the Economic Development district are set forth in Article 4.2.19 and are as follows: a) The district is located x Yes No The district is located Yes No adjacent to a Federal adjacent to Old NC 86, a Interstate Highway or a major arterial road. major arterial road. b) The district is located x Yes No The district is located outside Yes. No outside of the Chapel Hill- of the Chapel Hill-Carrboro _Carrboro Rural Buffer area Rural Buffer. as designated in the adopted Comprehensive Plan. c) The district shall not be x Yes No The district is not located in Yes No located within the critical the critical area of a water area of a designated supply watershed. water supply watershed. d) Urban services, such as x Yes No Water and sewer lines .are water and sewer mains, available at the site. are desirable, but not required if acceptable alternatives are available. ~' `~ 4 ARTICLE 7 -SPECIFIC STANDARDS FOR EVALUATION/PLANNED DEVELOPMENTS ("Yes" indicates compliance; °No" indicates non -compliance) (continued) PLANNING STAFF RECOMMENDED EVIDENCE SUBMITTED FINDINGS TO SUPPORT FINDINGS Ordinance Requirements Article 7.4 then indicates the _ application must comply with certain specific requirements common to all Planned Developments. These include: 7.4.1 So located with respect x,Yes No to major streets and mass transit facilities and designed so as not to create traffic on minor streets in residential districts. 7.4.2 So located with respect x Yes No to water, sewer and storm drainage facilities that .enlargement or extension will not result. in higher net public cost or earlier- incursion of public cost. and So located with respect to _x Yes No police, fire and rescue services, and schools and parks sous to have access in - the same manner as permitted. under the existing zoning. 7.4.3 Site suitable for " x Yes No development within hazard from flooding, erosion, -and soil subsidence of slipping. PLANNING BOARD FINDINGS Access is provided via Yes No Oakdale Drive and to Old NC 86. No minor residential streets wilt be affected by this project as proposed. The proposed development Yes No has public water and sewer, therefore, no higher net public cost will result. Letters regarding adequate Yes No service provision have been received from the Sheriff's Department, and fire and rescue services. The site is not located in a Yes No flood hazard or poorly drained area. ~~~ ARTICLE 6.29 -DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT (ED) DISTRICTS 5 ("Yes" indicates compliance• "No" indicates non -compliance) (continued) PLANNING STAFF RECOMMENDED EVIDENCE SUBMITTED PLANNING BOARD FINDINGS TO SUPPORT FINDINGS FINDINGS Ordinance Requirements 6.29.2 Design Review Process 1. Building elevation drawings for each proposed structure. 2. A minimum of two (2) drawings of sections through the site illustrating existing. and proposed grade, as well as the relationship of different site features. 6.29.3a Standards in the Hillsborough Area Economic Development District .Design Manual Standards genera//y a) Harmonious and efficient organization. The site plan shall be organized harmoniously and efficiently in relation to existing topography, the size and type of plot, the character of adjoining property, and the type and size of buildings. The site. will be developed to facilitate orderly development of surrounding property and with minimal disturbance to the natural environment. b) Preservation of natural state. Desirable vegetation or other unique natural features shall be preserved in their natural state when practical. The Environmental Protection Plan shall include the locations of all existing trees 12" diameter four feet above the ground. c) Enhancement of residential privacy. .The site plan shall provide reasonable visual, lighting, and sound privacy for all adjacent dwelling units. x_Yes No Building elevation drawings were submitted with the site . plan. _x_Yes No Existing and proposed grades, as well as the relationship of site features .are indicated on the site plan. _x_Yes No The site plan has been organized harmoniously 'and efficiently to indicate existing topography, size and type of .lot, character of adjoining property, type and size of buildings to provide for orderly development with minimal disturbance. x Yes No Vegetation and natural features have been preserved when practical. The Plan includes the locations of all existing trees 12" in diameter. _x_Yes No The site plan provides reasonable privacy for adjacent dwelling units through plantings, topography and lighting that meets the Orange, County lighting standards. Yes No Yes No Yes Yes Yes No No No ~1 s ARTICLE 6.29 -DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS. FO_R ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT (ED) DISTRICTS ("Yes" indicates compliance; "No" indicates non -compliance) (continued) PLANNING STAFF . RECOMMENDED EVIDENCE SUBMITTED PLANNING BOARD FINDINGS TO SUPPORT FINDINGS FINDINGS Ordinance Requirements Emergency access is provided through the two entrances. One on Old NC 86 and one on Oakdale Drive. Yes No d) Emergency access. _x Yes No Structures and other site features shall be arranged to permit practical emergency vehicle access to all sides of buildings. e) Access to public ways. x_Yes No Every structure and .,dwelling unit sha!! have access to a public street, walkway or other area dedicated to common use. f) Non-motorized circulation. x_Yes No A non-motorized circulation system shall be provided which is direct, efficient, and pleasant. The system shall be complementary to, but. independent of the vehicular circulation system. g) Design. of access and x_Yes No egress drives. The location, size, and numbers of ingress and egress drives to a site will be strictly limited to minimize the negative impacts on public streets and on adjacent property. This shall include formal entryways and access to .outparcels from inside the •. development only. hl Coordination with off-site x Yes No circulation systems. The arrangement of rights-of-way or .easements for circulation shall coordinate with the pattern of existing and planned streets, pedestrian and/or bicycle pathways and transit routes in the area. Connection to adjacent properties is encouraged where possible. Access is provided to Otd NC Yes No 86 and Oakdale Drive. Walkways are existing Yes No around the existing building and will be extended around the addition and along Old NC 86. Two access and egress drives exist now. The proposal is to provide one new entrance on Old NC 86 and change the ofd entrance to a right in, right out only however, NCDOT is recommending only -one access on Old NC 86. The Planning Staff is recommending this access be a right in and right out only. The arrangement for circulation coordinates with the pattern of existing circulation and .streets. Connection to adjacent properties is proposed when adjacent properties are developed. Yes No Yes No Q~"2 ARTICLE 6.29 -DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT (ED) DISTRICTS ("Yes' indicates compliance• 'No" indicates non -compliance) (continued) Ordinance Requirements i) stormwater .control. Protective measures shall ensure that removal of stormwater runoff will not adversely affect neighboring properties or the public storm drainage. system. Provisions shall be made for construction of wastewater facilities including grading, gutters, and piping to direct stormwater and prevent erosion. Surface water on all paved areas shall be collected at intervals that do not obstruct vehicular or pedestrian traffic. j) Exterior lighting. Location, type, size and direction of exterior lighting shall not glare or .direct illumination that interferes. with adjacent properties or safety of public rights-of-way. k) Protection of property values. Elements of a site plan shalt be arranged to have minimum negative impact on values of adjoining property and. other on-site uses. SpeciFc standards Unless otherwise indicated here, .the relevant standards for the specific Economic Development Districts shall apply. Where actions, designs, or solutians proposed by the applicant are not literally in accord with -the applicable regulations of this ordinance, but the Board of County Commissioners makes a finding in the particular case that public purposes are satisfied to an equivalent or greater degree, the Board may make specific modification of the regulations in the particular case. Any modification of regulations shall be explicitly indicated in the approved permit. PLANNING STAFF RECOMMENDED EVIDENCE SUBMITTED FINDINGS TO SUPPORT FINDINGS _x Yes No Orange County Erosion Control has reviewed protective measures for removal of stormwater runoff. _x_Yes No Exterior lighting meets all requirements including glare, direction and safety requirements of the lighting standards in the Orange County Zoning Ordinance. _x_Yes No Elements of the site plan have been arranged to provide setbacks and buffers to have minimum negative impact on adjoining properties. The ED-LNR zone requires structures less than .5,000 square feet, no drive through facilities and a building height restricted to 30 feet. The applicant is requesting the Board make specific modifications on these requirements to allow the following: 1. Two structures on the site. The existing building will be expanded to 7,334 sq. ft. and the remote teller station is 634 sq. ft. with a proposed new canopy of approximately 2,000 sq, ft, 2. Relocate existing drive through lanes and add a fifth one. 3. The existing. building height is 35 feet. PLANNING BOARD FINDINGS Yes Yes No No Yes No Q ~ 3 >3 ARTICLE 6.29 -DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT (ED) DISTRICTS ("Yes" indicates compliance; "No" indicates non -compliance) (continued) PLANNING STAFF RECOMMENDED EVIDENCE SUBMITTED PLANNING BOARD . FINDINGS TO SUPPORT FINDINGS FINDINGS Ordinance Requirements a) Relationship of buildings to site. 1. The site shall be planned to provide for adequate planting, safe pedestrian movement, and parking areas. 2. Parking areas shall be treated with decorative elements, building wall extensions, plantings, berms, or other innovative means so as to screen parking areas from view from public ways and reduce heat generated by paved areas. 3. Without restricting .the permissible limits of the applicable zoning district, the height. and scale of each building shall be compatible with its site and existing or anticipated adjoining buildings. 4. All utility services shall be underground. b) Relationship of buildings and site to adjoining areas. 1. Attractive landscape transition to adjoining properties shall be provided. 2. Lighting intensity at the property line .adjacent to residential uses shall not be greater than Y: footcandle. _x Yes No _x_Yes No Plantings, walkways and parking areas have been so designed to extend the existing development and provide .adequate facilities. Plantings, berms and the building will be used to screen parking areas from view. Yes No Yes No _x,Yes No x_Yes No _x_Yes No `x_Yes No Building height in the ED-LNR is restricted to 30 feet, however, the existing building is 35 feet. The applicant is requesting the Board make a finding that public purposes are satisfied and make a specific modification to this requirement. All utility services will be underground. Attractive landscaping has been provided around the existing .building and will be extended with the addition. Lighting intensity at the property line adjacent to the residential- uses do not exceed Yz foot candle. Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No ARTICLE 6.29 -DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT (ED) DISTRICTS ("Yes" indicates compliance; "No" indicates non -compliance) (continued) PLANNING STAFF RECOMMENDED' EVIDENCE SUBMITTED Ordinance Requirements c1 Building design. FINDINGS TO SUPPORT FINDINGS 1. Architectural style is not _x_Yes No restricted. Evaluation of the appearance of a project shall be based on its relationship to the surroundings. Primary and pedestrian facades . are encouraged to ~ complement and reflect the characteristics of downtown Hillsborough. 2. Specific building materials _x_Yes No are not endorsed. Evaluation of the appearance of a project shall be based on the relationship to surroundings. i. Materials and design x_Yes No shall be compatible with each other in multiple building projects. ii. Materials shall be x Yes No selected for suitability to the type of buildings and the design in which they are used. Utilitarian materials shall be limited to inconspicuous facades and non-public or service areas. Materials -with unique or special character are encouraged. 3. Buildings and .building x_Yes No components, such as walls, windows, doors, eaves, and parapets, shall have human proportions -and relationships to one another. Architectural style and appearance will match existing building facades. Appearance of the. project addition: is based on existing surroundings. Materials and design compatible with existing building. Materials were .selected to be compatible with existing building. Building components have the same proportions as the. existing building. 9~ PLANNING BOARD FINDINGS Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No ^ r ~5 ~o ARTICLE 6.29 -DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT fED) DISTRIGTS ("Yes" indicates compliance; "No" indicates non -compiiancei (continued) PLANNING STAFF RECOMMENDED EVIDENCE SUBMITTED FINDINGS TO SUPPORT FINDINGS Ordinance ReQUirements PLANNING BOARD FINDINGS 4. Mechanical equipment or x Yes other utility hardware on the roof, ground,. or buildings shall be screened from public view with materials harmonious with the building, or they shall be so located as not to be visible from any public ways. This provision does not apply to the installation of electric vehicle charging stations. 5. Exterior lighting shall be x Yes part of the architectural concept Fixtures, standards, and all exposed accessories shall be harmonious with building design. 6. Recycling and waste `x_Yes removal areas, service yards, storage yards, and exterior work areas shall be located away from and screened from view from .public ways, using materials as stated in criteria for equipment screening. Areas shall be sized to accommodate changes in technology and local refuse ordinances. 7. Variation of detail, form, material, and siting may be used to provide visual interest. In multiple building projects, variable siting of individual buildings may be used to prevent a monotonous appearance. _No Existing. mechanical Yes No equipment is located behind the building. The additional mechanical equipment needed will be located beside the existing equipment. ^No Exterior lighting wilt be Yes No harmonious with existing exterior lighting and will meet lighting standards in the Orange County Zoning Ordinance. _No Waste and recycling. will be Yes No handled as it is currently handled. x Yes No The proposed drive-thru will be separated from the existing building with a remote teller office. Yes No ~~~ 11 ARTICLE 6.29 -DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT (ED) DISTRICTS ("Yes" indicates compliance• "No" indicates non -compliance) (continued) PLANNING STAFF RECOMMENDED EVIDENCE SUBMITTED FINDINGS TO SUPPORT FINDINGS Ordinance Requirements d1 Landscaping and site _x_Yes No Much of the existing treatment. Landscape landscaping will remain. elements included in these New landscaping will be criteria consist of all forms added around the addition of planting and vegetation, consisting of plantings. ground forms, rock consistent with the existing groupings, water patterns, vegetation. and all visible construction except buildings and utility structures. New and existing vegetation shall be maintained in a flourishing manner. 1. Natural or existing x Yes No Topography will only be topographic patterns _ _ modified as necessary to contributing to the beauty accomplish additions. and utility of a development shall be preserved and developed. Modification to topography will be permitted where it contributes to good appearance and does not adversely affect significant natural features and. drainageways. 2. Grades of walks, parking _x_Yes No Grades of new walks and. spaces, terraces, and other paved areas will be paved areas shall provide consistent with existing an inviting and stable grades and provide a stable appearance. appearance. 3. Landscape treatment shall x_Yes No Landscaping will enhance be provided to enhance architectural features and the architectural features, visual corridor along Old. NC strengthen vistas and 86. The larger remaining important visual corridors, trees will also provide shade. and provide shade. 4. Unity of design shall be _x_Yes No New landscaping will be achieved by repetition of added with varieties of certain plan varieties and plantings consistent with other materials and by existing vegetation. correlation with adjacent developments. PLANNING BOARD FINDINGS Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No ~k~7 ,z ARTICLE 6.29 -DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT (ED) DISTRICTS ("Yes" indicates compliance• "No" indicates non -compliance) (continued) PLANNING STAFF RECOMMENDED EVIDENCE SUBMITTED FINDINGS TO SUPPORT FINDINGS Ordinance Requirements 5. Plant material shall be selected for its structure, texture, and color for interest and for its ultimate growth. Use of native plants is encouraged; others that will be hardy, harmonious to the design, and of good appearance can be allowed. 6. Appropriate curbs, tree guards or other devices shall be employed to protect plants susceptible to injury by pedestrian or motor traffic. . 7. Parking areas and trafficways shall be enhanced with landscaped spaces containing trees or tree groupings. 8. Service yards and other unsightly places shall be screened by use of walls, fencing and/or planting. e) Signs 1. Every sign shall have appropriate scale and proportion in its design and in its visual relationship to buildings and surroundings: A unified signage plan shall be submitted and .approved with the Special Use Permit.. 2. Every sign shall be designed as an integral architectural element of the building and the site to which it principally relates. 3. The colors, materials and lighting of every sign shall be harmonious with the building and site to which it principally relates. _x_Yes No _x_Yes No _x Yes No x Yes No Plant material was selected based on existing vegetation. Native plants have been selected that are harmonious to the design. Curbs are existing and will be extended to protect plants. Parking areas and trafficways have been landscaped. There are no service yards proposed. x Yes No Existing sign will not be changed. No additional signs are proposed. _x_Yes No Existing sign will not be changed. No additional signs are proposed. _x_Yes No Existing sign.. will not be changed. No additional signs are proposed. PLANNING BOARD FINDINGS Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Q~~ ARTICLE 6.29 -DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT (ED) DISTRICTS ("Yes" indicates compliance• "No° indicates non -compliance) (continued) PLANNING STAFF RECOMMENDED EVIDENCE SUBMITTED FINDINGS TO SUPPORT FINDINGS Ordinance Requirements 4. The number of graphic _x_Yes No Existing sign will not be elements on a sign shall be changed. No additional signs held to the minimum are proposed. needed to convey the sign's major message and shall be composed in proportion to the total area of the sign face. Plant material shall be selected for its structure, texture, and color for- interest and for its ultimate growth. Use of native plants is .encouraged; others that will be hardy, harmonious to the design, and of good appearance can be allowed. 5. Freestanding signs shall not _x_Yes No Existing sign is not pole- be pole-mounted. mounted. f) Maintenance, planning and design factors. 1. Materials and finishes shall x Yes No Exterior materials consist of be selected for their _ brick and .stucco for durability and wear as well durability, wear and as for their beauty.- Proper appearance. measures and devices shall be incorporated for protection against the elements, neglect, damage, and abuse. 2. Provisions for cleaning x_Yes No Configurations that tend to buildings and .structures accumulate debris and dirt and control of dirt and have been avoided. refuse shall be included in the design. Configurations that tend to accumulate debris and dirt shall be avoided. 13 PLANNING BOARD FINDINGS Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No 4~9 14 ARTICLE 6.29 -DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT (ED) DISTRICTS (°Yes" indicates compliance• "No" indicates non -compfiance- (continued) PLANNING STAFF RECOMMENDED EVIDENCE SUBMITTED FINDINGS TO SUPPORT fINDINGS Ordinance Requirements g) Transportation Network Capacity Two access and egress drives exist now. NCDOT is recommending one entrance on Old NC 86 instead of the two that are proposed. The existing 4 drive through lanes will be relocated and a fifth one added. The ED-LNR zone does not allow drive through facilities, therefore the applicant is requesting the Board make a finding that public purposes are satisfied and make a specific modification to this requirement. PLANNING BOARD FINDINGS Yes No ARTICLE 8.2.4 -SPECIFIC STANDARDS ALL SPECIAL USES ("Yes" indicates compliance; "No" indicates non -compliance) PLANNING STAFF RECOMMENDED FINDINGS Ordinance Requirements Article 8.2.4 requires the applicant to address the following: a) Method and adequacy of x Yes No provision for sewage disposal facilities, solid waste and water service. b) Method and adequacy of x Yes No police, fire .and rescue squad protection. c) Method and adequacy of _x Yes No vehicle access to the site and traffic conditions around the site. EVIDENCE SUBMITTED TO SUPPORT FINDINGS Applicant indicates water and sewer will be supplied by Hillsborough. Fire protection will be provided by the Hillsborough Fire Department, rescue service by , the Orange County Emergency Management, and police protection by the Orange County Sheriff's Department. The property will have direct access onto Oakdale Drive and Old NC 86. A traffic impact analysis has been requested. Changes may be made to the site plan to meet NCDOT and the Orange County Transportation Planner's recommendations. 15 PLANNING BOARD. FINDINGS Yes No Yes No Yes No ~~1 16 ARTICLE 8.2.1 & 8.2.2 -APPLICATION COMPONENTS ("Yes" indicates compliance• "No" indicates non -compliance) SUBMITTED INFORMATION (SEE .ATTACHED APPLICATION EVIDENCE SUBMITTED PLANNING BOARD INFORMATION) TO SUPPORT FINDINGS FINDINGS Ordinance Requirements In accordance with Article 8.2.1 and 8.2.2 of the Zoning Ordinance the Board of County Commissioners shall also consider the following general conditions before the application for Special Use shall be approved: Article 8.2.1 & 8.2.2 A description, To be determined by Board Will -Will Not 1. The use will maintain or narrative and site after receiving evidence to be promote the public health, plan of the proposed submitted or heard at public safety and general welfare, if addition have been hearin 9• submitted along with located where proposed and letters from EMS and developed and operated the Sheriff's Office. according to -the plan as - submitted. Article 8.2.1 A letter from To be determined by Board Will. -Will Not 2. The use will maintain or Howard Perry and after receiving evidence to be ' enhance the. value of Walston has been submitted or heard at public contiguous property (unless received. hearing. the use is a public necessity, in which case the use need not maintain or enhance the value of contiguous property).. Article 8.2.1 The application will To be determined by Board Is _Is Not The location and character 3 permit and expand after receiving evidence to be . if developed of the use an existing use. The submitted or heard at public , according to the plan Hillsborough Area hearing. Economic submitted, will be in harmony Development District with the area in which it is to Design Manual calls - be located and the use is in for this area to be compliance with the general Linear Office. plan for the physical development of the County as embodied in these regulations or in the Comprehensive Plan, . or portion thereof, adopted by the Board. of County Commissioners. NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ORANGE COUNTY BOARD OF~ COMMISSIONERS A public hearing will be held in the Judge F. Gordon Battle Superior Courtroom of the New Orange County Courthouse, 106 E. Margaret Lane, Hillsborough, North Carolina, on Monday, November 24, 2003, at 7:30 PM for the purpose of giving all interested citizens an opportunity to speak for or against the following items: A. ORANGE COUNTY-ZONING ATLAS AMENDMENT 1. PD-1-03 State Employees Credit Union Request for rezoning of an Economic Development -Limited Office 1 (ED-LO-1) district to a Planned .Development Economic Development Linear Office (PD-ED- LNR) district with a Class A Special Use Permit. The proposal will add 2,523 square feet to the existing building, a 634 square foot remote teller station with a 2,000 square foot canopy, and relocate the existing drive through lanes and add a fifth lane. The 3.25 acre tract is located 2313 Old NC 86, the southwest corner of Old NC 86 and Oakdale Drive (PIN numbers 9863-97-4356 and 9863-97-5102) in the Hillsborough Area Economic Development District. Development projects such as this site and building expansion in the Hillsborough Area Economic Development District which requires a minor deviation from the standards specified in the Hillsborough Area Economic Development District Design Manual may be approved by the Board of County Commissioners as a Planned Development with a Class A Special Use Permit. Purpose: A public hearing on this request is needed- because the proposed project is a special use permit modification and requests a minor deviation. of the standards specified in the Hillsborough Area Economic Development District Design Manual which would allow for administrative approval. B. CONCURRENT TEXT AMENDMENTS TO THE ORANGE COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE AND ORANGE COUNTY SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS 1. Text amendments to require a subdivision located in more than one zoning- district, including. a subdivision located in more than one. overlay district or a subdivision located in a non overlay district .and an .overlay district, to go through the planned development rezoning process. Purpose: To promote uniformity and consistency in .design for subdivisions that cross zoning district boundaries and/or where densities may be inconsistent in the different districts. 2. ZONING ORDINANCE: Amend Article 22 (Definitions), Article 4.1 (Establishment of Use Regulations), 4.3 (Permitted Use Table), and 6.29.4 (Additional Requirements for Certain Subdivisions) to require subdivisions with more than 20 lots, in rural designated areas, to follow a planned development/special use permit/zoning atlas amendment process. Existing regulations require subdivisions with more than 40 .lots, in rural designated areas, to follow a planned development/special use permit/zoning atlas amendment process. The following amendments, a-d, delete the category of rural special use between 21 lots and 40 lots because the G ~~ amendment replaces this lot range with a proposal of 21 lots and above as a planned developmentlspecial use. a. Article 22 (Definitions) -Delete the definition. of a "Major Subdivision, Class A Special- Use, Rural Designated" and amend the definition. of a "Major Subdivision, Planned Development, Rural Designated". b. Article 4.1 (Establishment of Use Regulations) -Delete the definition of a "Major Subdivision, Class A Special Use, .Rural Designated" and amend the definition of a "Major Subdivision, Planned Development, Rural Designated." c. Article 4:3 (Permitted Use Table) -Delete the "Major Subdivision, Class A Special .Use, Rural Designated" note and amend the "Major Subdivision, Planned Development/ Special Use, Rural Designated" note. d. Article 6.29.4 (Additional Requirements for Certain Subdivisions) -Delete the definition of a "Major Subdivision, C{ass A Special Use, Rural Designated" and amend the definition of a "Major Subdivision, Planned Development, Rural Designated". 3. SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS: Amend Section II (Definitions) and Section 1lI-D-3 (Preliminary Plat Approval) to the same definitions as those in the Zoning Ordinance referenced above. C. TEXT AMENDMENTS TO THE ORANGE COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE 1. Amend Article 4.3 (Permitted Use Table) and Article 8 (Special Uses) artd the standards therein to allow "School, elementary, middle, and high," with the approval of a Class A special use permit and to apply special use permit standards that meet the general standards, zoning district requirements and the applicable standards detailed in Section 8.8.29 and 8.8.30 of the Zoning Ordinance. Purpose: Schools are an essential public facility and are allowed in most zoning districts by right. However, they do pose certain impacts, most notably traffic. Addressing them as a special use in all the districts, besides the presently designated Economic Development zoning district, will make if possible to more effectively mitigate impacts and be consistent throughout the county planning jurisdiction. 2. Telecommunication Towers: Amend Article 6.18 (Telecommunication .Towers and Equipment) and Article 8.8.17a (Telecommunication Towers) to require: a. At the annual telecommunications projection meeting that .the initial propagation studies begin with co-locations on existing structures. b. Photo simulations to be submitted at time of application. c. Balloon photos and panorama photos to be filed at time of application. d. Payment of $1,000.©fl into the escrow account at pre-application meeting to .cover fees incurred by consultant prior to formal application submittal e. Propagation studies, to scale, of entire network. f. Revise the intent, scope, and use of.the Master Telecommunications Plan (MTP) to create a planning tool for information purposes, g. Revise standards of evaluation in Section 8.8.17a.2 to establish a hierarchy of preferred locations and procedures. h. Other minor changes to improve process and clarity. Y7 ~ Pumose: During review of four Telecommunications Tower applications under the r recently adopted amendments, a few minor inconsistencies have become apparent to applicants, the staff, the consultant and attorneys. These minor amendments are intended to clarify those inconsistencies to provide a better understanding of the various aspects of the review process. Also included in these amendments is a revision of the intent, scope and use of the Master Telecommunications Plan (MTP) concept which was adopted as a placeholder in the ordinance pending future BOCC review and approval. D. TEXT AMENDMENTS TO THE ORANGE COUNTY SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS 1. Amend section IV-B-3.. Streets, to consider requiring bicycle facilities, sidewalks, and common .access points concurrent with development projects that abut or adjoin roadways with approved access management plans.. Purpose: To more effectively address the transportation impacts and multi-modal aspects of development projects. 2. Amend section V-D. Final Plat. Purpose: To update certifications that are outdated, to add a certification and an endorsement for the Schools Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance, and to add statements for water and sewer endorsements; also minor changes related to process. and procedure and information to be shown on final plat. Changes may be made in the advertised proposals that reflect debate, objections and discussion a# the hearing. Accommodations for individuals with physical disabilities .can be provided if the request is made to the Director of Planning at least 48 hours prior to the Public Hearing by calling the appropriate number listed below. The full text of the changes may be obtained after November 19, 2003 from the Planning Department. Also, the text may be obtained at the County website www.co.orange.nc.us at the Agendas and Reports link prior to the meeting. Questions regarding the .proposals may be directed to the Orange County Planning Department located in the Planning and Agricultural Center, 306E Revere Road, Hillsborough, .North Carolina. Office hours are from 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Monday through Friday. You may also call 245-2575 (Hillsborough), 688-7331 (Durham), 967-9251 (Chapel Hill-Carrboro) or 227-2031 (Mebane/Graham). Please ask for extension 2575 or 2585. You will be :directed to a staff member who will answer your questions. PUBLISH: News of Orange Chapel Hill Herald Chapel Hill News November 12, 2003 November 12, 2003 November 12, 2003 November 19, 2003 November 19, .2003. November 19, 2003 F ~~ ~~~~ ~~~~~ r~ b SR 17 CLARET WALT RS Rd -~__ ~ .44A.19 4.4OA.23A 4.44A.1 4. A.15 A.18 4.45.. 4.45._2C 4.44.6.22 4. . 9A .44.6.20 4 B 1 4.45R..1 4. .B.1 C 4.44 B 24 4.45R..1 4.44.8.25 4.45 .. 4.45R._28 .44.8.20 4.44.8.2 .44.6. 9 4. .B.1 E 4.45..2 4 .B.1 Q ..4.44.6.27 - ~~ log--~ C Q Falter i otParcek This map wrdains parcels prepared for the irwentory of real propety WBhin N 7ezt Street Teat - - Orange County, and is compOed Born recorded deed. plats. and btfld pubfie - Pie~e Roads records and data. Users of th's map are hereby notified that the aforementioned ublic Pranary i~ormation SOllrces should be consulted for verification of the 1 :4000 - ~ Teat Townshp7exi p information conained on this map_ The rowdy and ifs mapping companies assume ~ 'Townships no legal responsibility for the irdormation contained on this map: aon alyrm . ..Oran e Coun GIS - 'd ORANGE COUNTY PLANNING & INSPECTIONS DEPARTMENT Craig N. Benedict, AICP, Director `o`atP oI ®' - Administration ,~~ * ~. '°~ 306E Revere Road (919) 245-2575 u 4 P O Box 8181 (919) 644-3002 (FAX) ,- Hillsborough, www.co.orange.nc.us '"°r~b ~a~~~'~ North Carolina, 27278 CERTIFICATE OF MAILING REZONING PLANNED DEVELOPMENT and CLASS A SPECIAL USE PERMIT ORANGE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA " I, Eddie Kirk, Zoning Officer, Orange County, North Carolina, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that on or about November 7, 2003, I mailed, by certified mail, postage prepaid, a Notice of the Public Hearing to be held on the request for a Rezoning Planned Development and Class A Saecial Use Permit under Article 8.8.23 of the Orange County Zonin4 Ordinance to construct additions to the State Employees Credit Union facilities, to each properly owner as required by Article 2 Section 2.3.3.4 of the Orange County Zoning Ordinance The notice mailed specified the date, time, place and subject. of the Public Hearing on the zoning variance request. WITNESS my hand, this the 7~' day of November, 2003. ~. ~~~ ~~~ EDDIE KIRK ZONING OFFICER i~ ~ I •,,,.w 6d~o ~'Q~pyN,N® STATE of NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION MICHAEL F. EASLEY LYNDO TII'PETT GOVERNOR SECRETARY November 17, 2003 ORANGE COUNTY Mr. Eddie Kirk Orange County Planning 3 06-F Revere Rd. P.O. Box 8181 Hillsborough, NC 27278 Subject: Plan Review for Proposed Addition to the State Employees Credit Union Located on SR 1009 (S. Churton St.) in Hillsborough Per you request this office has reviewed the. site plan submitted by O'Brien Atkins and has conducted a site visit during the PM peak hour. The proposed addition does not appear to significantly increase the trips generated by this site. The proposed new full access driveway located near the southern property comer on Old NC 86 is too close to the existing Millstone Drive. This location would potentially result in conflicts with • southbound left turn movements onto Millstone Drive. This office does not recommend a full. access driveway at this location. The conversion of the existing driveway on OId 1VC 86 to a right in-right out would eliminate potential left turn conflicts. It should be noted, however, that during the peak hour field visit, na functional problems were noted with. this existing full access driveway and the nearby intersection of Oakdale Drive and Otd. NC 86. The proximity of existing neighboring driveways and intersections provide little opportunity for appreciable traffic flow improvement at this time. TIP project R-2825 has been included in the 2004-2010 Transportation Improvement Program. This project will include the widening of Old NC 86 from I-40 to U.S. 70 Business to a multilane facility. The current design is a divided facility with limited median cross over. It is anticipated that once this project is constructed that all access to this site on Old NC 86 would be limited to right in right out only. With this information in mind this ai~ice 'makes the following recommendations: P.O. Box 766 Graham, N.C. 27253 Telephone (336)-570-6833 2 ~u~ 1. The existing full access drive on Old NC 86 appears to function satisfactorily and may be retained. 2. The proposed new driveway is too close to Millstone Drive and should not be constructed. No additional access to Old NC 86 should be constructed. 3 . A public right of way 50' from the existing center line of Old NC 86 and 40' from the centerline of Oakdale Drive should be dedicated to accommodate the proposed TIP project and future improvements if possible. 4. Connectivity to adjacent property is encouraged to ultimately provide an access across from Millstone Drive. 5. On site flow should be managed to prevent a traffic queue onto Old NC 86. This can be mitigated by one- way internal flow. If I can be of further assistance, feel free to contact me. .Sincerely, `--~~''T C. N. Edwards 7r., P.E. District Engineer HILLSBOROUGH AREA EDD 1-4alOld N.C.Highway 8s District ;* Other than 1-40, only one road has been included on the Orange County and HiAsborough Thoroughfare Plans -Old N.C.Highway s6. - Classified as art arterial street, Old N.C.Highway s6 is currently capable of handng t 0,000 vehicles per day and har! an average dau7y traffic volume of 8,300 vehicles per day in - - 1986. By the year 2005, traffic on the road is expected to reach 19,600 vehicles per day. With traffic volumes expected to exceed the capacity of the - road, the Hiusborough Thoroughfare Plan calls for the widening of Old N.C.Highway 86. The proposed cross section for widening is a four-lane fac~7ity, with sidewalks and two travel • lanes in either drection, plus a center turn lane. To accomplish the widening, the right-of-~,vay would also have to be expanded from 60 feet to 90 feet. 100' ROW Travel lanes, Travel lanes 16' ~ 12' 12' 16' i i _s' Sidewalk,. mss' Sidewalk 4' Bike Lane 25' landscape Median 4' Bike lane ~~ Prr~xss~d'Irrw~-,rarer cross.st~cf~ 1~r Rather than ut7ize the five-fare facility proposed in the OklN.C. Hg~e"i ira~/ Pr. - - Hillsborough Thoroughfare Plan, a different cross section is _ desired. To provide an attractive entranceway inta "Amerrde~d r - r 7-sty :Hillsborough and to prevent the strip commerciallcross-traffic - - -turning movements associated with Churton Street, the cross section would be changed to provide a landscape median instead of a center turn lane. Turn. lanes would only be avau'lable at designated access points. These points were identified on the schematic plans presented in section 2.t, Development Preas. In addition to the landscape median, the outside lane would be widened from 12 feet tot 6 feet to accommodate bike lanes EC0Y't~0R7iC Devek~a-rrerttDistricts 17es~'t I-4arwaf Page 33. ro AGO APPROVED 4/13/2004 MWUTES !JD ~ f y ORANGE COUNTY ~/Q~ " °~ ~ ~ BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS ~~~,t s~-D 3 AND ORANGE COUNTY PLANNING- BOARD C . l• cr.~ QUARTERLY PUBLIC HEARING NOVEMBER 24, 2003 7:3Q pm: The Orange County Board of Commissioners and the Orange County Planning Board met in joint session fora :public hearing on Monday, November 24; 2003 at 7:30 p.m. in the F, Gordon Battle Courtroom in Hillsborough, North. Carolina. COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENT: Commissioners Moses Carey, Vice Chair Alice M. Gordon, Stephen H' Halkiotis and Barry Jacobs COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ABSENT: Chair MargarefW. Brown., COUNTY ATTORNEY PRESENT: S. Sean Borhanian GOUNTY STAFF PRESENT:.. County Manager John M. Link, Jr., and Clerk to the Board Donna S. Baker (All other staff members will. be identified appropriately below} PLANNING. BOARD MEMBERS PRESENT': Vice..-Chair Hunter Schofield and members Noah.. Ranells, Jay Bryan, Cranford Goodwin, Barry Katz,.: Sam Lasris, Ted Triebel Bryan' Dobyns, PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS. ABSENT: Chair Nicole Gooding-Ray; Rachel Preston, Maria Tadd, °Renee Price NOTE: ALL DOCUMENTS REfERRED TO IN THESE'MINUTES ARE IN THE PERMANENT AGENDA FILE CN THE PERMANENT AGENDA FILE IN THE' A. Opening Remarks from the Chair -Vice-Chair Alice Gordon called the meeting to order,. in the absence of Chair Brown.. B. Public Charge.-Commissioner Alice Gordon-dispensed with the .reading of the public .charge; Commissioner Gordon said that she will open the meeting, call for the motions ofthe BOCC', -.and close the meeting. Vice-Chair of he Planning Board Hunter Schofield will chair the :public hearing items:: C, Public Hearing-Planning Board Vice-Chair Hunter Schofield 1'. Orange County Zoning Atlas Amendment - PD-1-03 State Employees Credit Union a. Request for rezoning of an Economic Development -Limited Office 1 (ED-LO-1 } district to a Planned Development Economic Development Linear Office (PD-ED LNRt district with a Class A Special Use Permit. Hunter Schofield reviewed the: procedure for this part of he agenda :item:. Procedures for Re-Zoning and Special Use Permit The Re-zoning will be=legislative The Special Use' Perm;~t is quasi-judicial' and these are the procedures:. 1,. Call of Agenda item by Planning Board Vice-Chair Hunter Schofield'' - There will be three minute time limit for statements 2. Presentation by'Staff Agenda Item Number 1 -:Orange County Zoning Atlas Amendment, PD-1-Q3 -State Employees Credit Union.. This is a request for a rezoning of an Economic Development Limited Office First, procedures for a rezoning', this involves procedures for a rezoning and,a special use permit. The rezoning will be legislative.. The Special Use Permit. process is quasi judicial and there will be, certain procedures>which will be followed tonight. First and foremost, there'll' be a swearing in by Donna Baker. And we'll do that en masse, and so she'll ask for everyone who intends to testify at` this quasi-judicial hearing to stand and be sworn in. Secondly, there'll be a presentation by staff:. Thirdly, there'll be statements in support of the proposal by the applicants. Fourthly, there'11 be an opportunity for opponents to the proposal to speak, and, then, if necessary, there'll be rebuttals from both sides. Wiih that, let me go ahead and turn this over to Donna. Baker for the swearing. in. 3. Clerk to the Board Donna Baker asked for anyone who will be providing testimony on this item -Special Use Permit- to please come forward in order to give them an oath:. She asked" if there was anyone that was going to testify'that would object o being sworn in. If so, she will .:give them a separate oath. (Na one did). The Clerk asked the 5 individuals who were being sworn in to place left hand on;the Bible; and she asked them,. "Do you solemnly swear°to tell the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth, so help you God?" Robert Davis, Craig Benedict, .Jonathan Parsons., Jay Smith and Ryna Stephenson took the oath. The Clerk then asked them to leave any materials that they were using in support or opposition to this amendment with-the Clerk and" she will retain them in the Clerk's office Hunter Schofield: 0K. We're now ready to proceed with the presentation by staff. Planning Director, Craig Benedict. Craig Benedict: Good evening. This ifem is both: a rezoning and a special use permit. As the Vice= Chair said, it is a process that involves°two separate: issues, one being legislative, one being quasi=: judicial.. We are nestling those two together tonight :because, atone point, there'll be a decision on the rezoning but not at tonight's meeting. But that would- be a separate decision at some time in he future, whetherit is appropriate to change from its existing zoning district to this new zoning district.. After that decision is made at a subsequent meeting: to this, if that is found to be acceptable from a legislative standpoint, then.. you will move into the second process, which is a Class A Special Use. Permit.. Both of these issues will.. have eventual recommendations from the Planning Board, again, at a meeting. subsequentto this.. And then a Special Use Permit is an opportunity to set a list of conditions on .how the site plan would eventually unfold:.. This site development plan., which will be part of he Special Use Permit, is very .close to a formal site plan. To go through:the actual information to be submitted by staff, Robert.Davis,. the current Planning Supervisor, will go through that -item to explain the different aspects of the proposal. And` then, we'11 turn it aver to the different-:parts of the process. So I'll introduce .Robert;,. Davis and he'll continue with this application. Technical Evaluation:: Robert :Davis; As he had said, this is a planned development request #o rezone property to Planned Development Economic Development Linear Office, which i5 the district that was .designated for this portionof the EDD (in the Hillsborough,area EDD),_:back when the BOCC redid the Hillsborough EDD about two years ago, This is the State Employees' Credit Union. It is located at the intersection of Qakdale and NC 86. Lt's in the Hillsborough'Township. It is adjacent to the Citgo service station, which is located back. over to the east (pointing to map). You have the Hillsborough EDD to the north. Back to the western side, you have a single family home,.: but that is .also in the Orange County EDD, And on the south side of the property you have asingle-family house that's also in the ED-t_O district. The building size that is there, now is a 5,000-square foot`building. It was built back in '97-'98 time period...:. And they have run out of space. They have recently acquired the property to the south and are looking to expand this.-:from. the 1:,88-acre site, which is the :current site,,. by adding another 1.37 acres to that, for a total of 3.25 acres. The building itself 'has an ATM' lane.. -The ATM machine is actually in the building. That is one lane.: And then there are three drive-through'; lanes: for the conducting;of business by the people' that ga through. They have a total of four-lanes including the ATM. The current zoning on the site is ED-LO-1, on the northern portion. And it has a special use permit. that the Commissioners approved, that was not removed when this was rezoned to ED-LO-1. So the Special Use Permit, fo'r at least the northern portion, is still in place.. The southern tract is for general: use zoning, ED-LO-1 for all of the uses that are currently in the table of permitted uses of that district. What they're. doing now, :through the planned developmen# process, is a map :amendment, which is the legislative part, to rezone the whole tract to a planned.. development ED-LO-1 classification with a Special Use Permit, which is the quasi-judicial part, that includes the site plan review. (pointing to rnap) The Credit Union is asking to add a little bit on the northern side of the property. (Mr. Davis referred to a map] They want to put some office space there;- converting of the canopy area that is the .existing drive-through lanes. That would also be converted to office with the pavement around. that portion to be taken. up and re-sown with grass and landscaping. They would also have a new bui ding that wou d be built on the southern entl of the property, which is about fi35- quare feet, hat would be a remote teller station for the employees to work, handling the new, relocated drive- through lanes. They are requesting. a total of five lanes- one ATM, and one of them would be an addition - so 'it would be a 33-percent expansion of what they have., Also, there would be a 2000 square foot canopy that would be built over those drive-throughJanes. It would be an additional 2334-square foot addition to theaite: The water and sewer currently is now provided by the Town of Hillsborough and would continue to be served by Hillsborough. They would work through the Hillsborough requirements to expand the water and sewer within their site. The Planning .Department has received agency comments from. the Sheriff's Department: The Sheriffs office said that they do not have any issues with this. Emergency Managementand the Fire Marshal have indicated that they would not have any problems servicing the area. And NC- DOT has provided some comments: relating to the- access.. The Credit Union currently has a full service access. on NC 86 and a full service access on Oakdale:. What they (Credit. Union) had- requested on this .plan was another full-service access to the south. One of DOT's comments-was that access would be too close to the business park access -Millstone Drive- and'. that they would recommend that'that driveway be re--located because the intersection is too close, Staff also is recommending that that oneaccess'be eliminated on this plan, and to-continue to use the driveway on the northern side on the existing site. Mr. Davis said that there are some performance standards that they have .not met yet under our ordinance. If a developer or an applicant cannot meet all of the requirements of the particular district in which they're located, they can ask-for minor deviations from #the plan. And the Board has 'the ability to approve those minor deviations if there is a public purpose or a public benefit that` could be derived. from making those minor deviations: The first one is the maximum floor area in the ED-Limited Office - in the Linear Office District. That district is set' up fora minimum 20,OOQ-square foot size lot: Vl/e have a maximum floor area ratio of 5,000 square' feet for each building of the 20,000. It is roughly 25 percent of the lot that could be covered with the building:. This particular zoning lot, once you tlo the two additions for the two properties, will be 3;25 acres,or 1'41,000 square feet. If you .played out the 20,000-square foot-lot, that would be the equivalent of about 40,OQ0 square feet that you could actually build on those. lots if they were :all indivdually° ubdivided and then brought back in with their 5,000-square foot maximums each.. However, the Credit Union.. is not proposing to do that.. The other thing,that could have happened on this site is, had the Credit Union not<purchased the property, tha#'adjacent property cou d have been subdivided into 20,000-square foot ats and each° of those could have come back with 5,000-square foot additions. So, roughly 10,000 square feet could have been built if that adjacent property had been sold, or if someone else had. purchased it, and they legally subdivided it and then .brought back a requirement. You could have had-= up to 40,000 square feet on the same size lot, oc, under the second scenario, you could have had, an additional 10,000 on that adjacent lot. What they are asking for is 7,334 square feet fatal for the entire 3.25-acre site. It is up to the Board to decide and the Planning Board. to look at as to whether or' not this request has sufficient public benefit. to allow this: request as it is now: being proposed. The seconddeviation that;the Credit Union is requesting wild be the Hll sborough Area EDD, which was approved by BOCC as not allowing drive-through facilities: The four lanes that are there now are technically grand-fathered in. They are also under a Specia Use .Permit and they cannot. be deemed illegal under the Special'Use Permit (SUP) because the SUP was in place when he new zoning. was put into effect. So the additional lane would be a request to deviate from the standards of no drive-through facilities. The 33 percent expansion would be a request;to this Board.. 'The Planning Department researched this to find out what they may or may not be doing. They are promoting their Internet banking. The Credit Union is encouraging people to do more of their business by the Internet, The Credit Union will then. be able to reduce-the amount of "sit" times for people looking to transact business at the drive-through.. They are looking to .service their existing :clients and possible increase heir clientele. There is a'lirnitation as to what can be added to the. Credit Union based on their criteria. I don't think just anyone can join the Credit Union. Sa they are limited as to who would be able to joint the Credit Union over the--Tong.. term. They are looking at this expansion as a way#o serve their existing client base, which#hey feel could also reduce emissions because people are sitting for shorter amounts of time. The third issue or deviation is really not a deviation.. The maximum building height in this proposed district is 30 feet. The existing building is, in a<couple o€ places, 35 feet. Buf what the Credit Union in asking.to add on is significantly less than the 30 feet. Any addition that they are looking to add on to this building meets the requirements of the district. But, if it's rezoned.. to PD-ED-LNR, you will. have anon-conforming situation and would'need a deviation that. is five feet, which would be a little bit too all. There,were cand'itions placed on thisrn 1997. We'have incorporated all of those back to it, related: #o sewer and landscaping... NCDOT requirements .back then were to dedicate. right-af-ways, which they did. For some reason it has not shown up on the Land Records system, but there was right-of- way dedicated along. Hwy 86 for 20 feet. And the Credit Union figs requested. an additional five feet along Oakdale, which we're going to ask for that same amount`again, and to verify that it actually has been done. If the .Board were to approve the Special Use Permit, it would only last for one year. If'the Credit Union has not started anyconstructionwithm one year, it would: expire, And #hat has to do mainly with our zoning. The actual recommendation by Staff is the Zoning Officer's. recommendation. And we have not found anything in our investigation to indicate that this isnot a reasonable good use in that particular area. And if the County Commissioners and the Planning Board make any recommendation, and could see that the deviations were reasonable, hey could recommend the site plan with a couple of conditions that we felt at the staff level would be an addition far safety purposes. We're staying with the same ones that were on the .previous plan. The access that DOT is saying needs to be eliminated, we're staying with that. We agree with the. DOT since it is their road;. Also, in reference to the .northern driveway, Staff is recommending that it be converted to a right-in- right-out at this time.. DOT's recommendation was to do it at a later-date when the cross-section for Hwy $6 was improved. They'are calling for that to be a 100-foot right-of-way,. 16- and 14-foot travel lanes with sidewalks, and a 25-foot median, which takes you to a 100-foot cross-section. And the Credit Union is saying, when that happens, and where they're thinking roughly 2010, maybe, then that would become aright-in-right-out. So, we're .actually saying maybe it might be best to get used. to that now.. That's one of the staff conditions. There's also, for interconnectivity purposes, along the franc with the undeveloped. area, with the house to thee. south should hat properly develop, to allow-access between. these two tracts, and #hat potentially, if that next tract develops, you could have the Millstone Dtiveway ne up into this side of the road, which would a low properties up here to came out at potential y a lighted intersection for afety purposes.. In no event would we recommend the southern driveway as they propose.. We also have a traffic study that was updated. The Credit Union has a presentation on the traffic patterns. Weihavethe 1997 traffic impact study, and then there was a, one-page update on that that shows the amount of raffic and how much drive-through traffic that they have at certain times of the year. We will; look at the ite plan now. The Credit Union is proposing some underground storage of`their storm water.: As you all know, (here is an over ground storage,-area .next to aakdale Road, that has a chain link fence around :it with a brown tarp. That would stay in place to handle the exs#ing. drainage on the existing site. For the new addition, they are proposing an underground drainage storage tank-that would; discharge at a rate that would' not provide any storm water problems. That would be located roughly underneath [Mr. Davis refers to map]., the parking area,.. next to teller station.:: They had looked into doing underground storage a few .years' back on this but nothing ever came of that. But there were a couple of people that ditl inquire about the potential of doingthat. It would' have required that some of the trees be removed up in the front portion of the site so you would have. to build it at another location. You could not tear this one up until you got the other one in place. So, you would end' up with some trees gone:. So they more or less dropped that. That completes the staff's report. I'd be glad to answer arty of your questions now or later. Hunter Schofield: Questions for staff by members of the Commission? Commissioner Jacobs:.:. I'll wait until after we hear`the other presentation.... Commissioner Gordon: 'The area of`the_ntersection of'Oakdale and' Old 8fi that is showing. (referring to map} that beautiful area with the large trees. 1s there any intent at any point to disturb that? Robert Davis: No, not according to this plan; that: is going to stay. For the most part, thee. existing. cite w%ll stay the same with the exception of converting some of those spaces on the north end to° compact spaces because of'the addition. And then the canopy area is going to be enclosed for office. space. But, other than that, the majority of the work will. be on the new portion to the south: And there will be some enhancement on the landscaping along the frontage there. Commissioner Halkiotis` Could somebody just paint out where DOT's 2010 sidewalk would.: eventually come out to? In the middle of those trees?' Robert Davis.: No sir. We have the 100-foot right-of-way up to the sidewalk included at the very back. portion of the right-of-way. The way the profile looks, is, you would have asix-foot walkway, curb and gutter, a 16-foot travel lane, a 14-foot travel lane. It's a;14 -1'6, it's 30 plus the s~ feet= ~6. Same way on the other side -would be 76. And they're calling far a 25-foot median. It would really have to be 24. That's the way it would work, Craig Benedict: One comment, (or `alignment') the Oakdale and Oakdale Drive extension, we have discussions with DOT about how that would be made. a little more perpendicular through here.. So the acquisition of additional right-of-way may be on the other side, and looks like it has been .accommodated on the Oakdale. side. Even with this 100-foot cross section you would not have landscaping right at this intersection but would internally. But farther down Old 86 there would be a four-lane divided highway. And that is what was approved in the Economic Development District proper. We've also: talked' with NCDOT - it probably will. have to be Hillsborough -about possible right turn lane improvements here, whether it's through some small urban money, or working with Hillsborough. There has been a :need in this intersection for some improvements. The important thing. is that you .have the right-of=way dedicated. to do an expansion. Hunter Schofield: Any other questions before we turn this over to the' applicants-for presentation? Barry Katz: I have a question about the lanes, the. temporary exiting of the bank of the Credit Union. The way it is now, you're proposing that if be right-in and right-out.- And what has been proposed forhow people who were trying to drive, let's say north after they leave the bank. How are they going to get to go north' -for those people who come from the South and driving north -how are they going to get .into the bank? Robert Davis: They will have a full service access on Oakdale, which is a lighted' intersection. It's safer. Generally, DOT prefers people to use' a, lighted intersection rather than the movements :across busy highways. If you wanted to enter the site from the south, you would go up to the light, take a left, and come in that way. And`the same way with when you are leaving. If you wanted to go right, you would take your right out and go towards Interstate 40. If you wanted. to come back into town, you'd go-out Oakdale and take a left there, Haunter Schofield:: Let me just mention to members of the Planning Board., there will also be several opportunities as we go forward in this hearing to ask questions of different. presenters and some concluding questions, if you happen to have any. Robert Davis: One important thing is the zoning amendment - we would recommend approva'I of that -for the zoning to PD-ED-LNR. And for the site plan-and Special. Use Permit, Staff would.. recommend. approval of the site ..plan, provided you :make. the findings that the deviations would be necessary. Administration; recommends referring both items back to the Planning Board for a recommendation back to the BOCC. We would take it to the Planning Board the first week in .January,. and then get it will.. back to the County Commissioners in January or early February. That is our recommendation. Hunter Schofield: Very good. pk, let's move forward. 1f we could hear from the applicants: Please make sure you've been sworn in -and please: state your name as you come forward. I have a list of speakers here, but I'm not sure if they overlap with the applicants. I've got a Jona#han Parsons. Is that one of the applicants? Jonathan, please. come forward.. Welcome. Statements h sunnart of the nroaosal; :Jonathan Parsons:: I appreciate your time. this evening to go overthis project and basically just to sum up what Mr. Davis.has already spoken to you about. We are an existing bank site or credit union sate. And, we're, quite literally, trying to do this: improvement #o better serve our current customer base that is slightly expanding, but we're just mainly out to give our clients the best possible facility they can have. As it was stated, we are trying to minimize any impact to the existing site... We're. helping to preserve those really large cedars and the: hemlocks and the grasses. And; in fact, we're actually incorporating similar materials into all the expansion area to help make if anice--uniform, very visually-pleasing appearance from the intersection,. so when you`re coming by you see one homogenous appearance. Ands. if you go back.#o, the landscape plan, you would see it in the section showing a very similar character.. With that, we have talked at length with. the Planning 'Department and have agreed with al'mast all of the frndings. And we've talked with NCDOT and have gotten their input on Phis. We would like.. to move forward with the site plan°with the exception of - we will. accept their condition of removing the second proposed driveway. But, :pending a presentation by my traffic engineer, Rynal Stephenson, we would Tike to keep the existing driveway a full access drive, as we understand in 2010 or so, that drive- would be converted to a right-in and right-out.. But, with the current facility being as it is, we can`t'foresee when the adjacent southern parcel would develop and give us that full access intersection with Millstone. And DOT has reviewed our plans and they'believe the intersection that is currently there, the existing driveway, is a functional driveway. It's not an optimum, but it is functioning. There is enough queue space for people making alert-hand turn into our site and`vice versa on Oakdale, so it seems to work. With that, we are prepared to go forward with the right-of- way dedications. We've actually shown it on all of our plans that we submitted to the State. We have carried the additional right-of-way an $6, and it is in line with the entire sidewalk we're proposing. We're planning on extending that to the edge of our property line. And the same with Oakdale. I believe that was actually already filed with the previous site plan:. If there are any questions of me specifically aboutthe site plan, I'd be happy to cover them now, Otherwise, I'll let our traffic engineer give you a quick analysis of what they found from an actual'.: study of thearaffic countwe've done in'the past week, just to help justify why we think we're making a qualitative improvement, not pushing the quantity up too much:. Hunter Schofield:- If it's ok with'the Board, I think we'll hear from all of the applicants and their consultants, and then, perhaps, we'll turn it over to questions. Isthat agreeable? OK. Then I've got J':W. Smith and Rynal Stephenson and it can be in#hat order, or how you choose. And again, please make sure you've been worn in :and please state your°name. Rynal Stephenson: Good evening. My name is Rynal Stephenson and t`m with Raimey Kemp and'. Associates, a'traffic engineering. firm out of Raleigh, N.G'. We went out on Thursday of last week: and conducted traffic counts during the. morning from eight o'clock to tern o'clock a.m, and":also in the afternoon from four o`clock to sa :o'clock p.m. This handout that Jonathan: is currently passing out -the first page gives.-you a summary of this brief study-that we have conducted. and is followed``. by a couple of tables that show the trip generation of the; existing Credit Union and, also, if you add an additional drive-through window, we have a very: conservative estimate, which is towards the high end of the traffic that maybe generated.. And,`the second table is a summary of level. of service, which is the measure. of haw the intersections will operate during. the morning and afternoon peak periods, And it's: followed by some five figures that show the-traffic volumes that we counted last Thursday and, also., the existing Credit Union traffic followed by same of the percentages of where the traffic is currently going, and where we anticipate::-any additional traffic to go. We went out and did traffic counts on Thursday, and came back and looked at those traffic volumes and got an idea of where. the traffic was going. We wanted to get an idea of how the intersections. would operate if the expansion were to occur and an additional drive-through lane were added, with some expansion of the office space:... If L can refer to Table 1 on he second page; there was a traffic study done -for this development in 1.997, I 'believe. On the very first line of-that table,. which shows you the estimated traffic-numbers or trips hat will be generated by the Credit Union, and if you will look down on the secontl row., where it says, "RKA Count," that is the traffic volumes that we counted:, l would like to point out that the 1997 traffic study based the trips on the square footage of the development of the. site. And it appears that it's a little bit: low in the morning; but it's a little bit high in the evenings. So when .the Credit Union was built, it accommodated these traffic volumes and in the afternoon the traffic volumes are not quite as high as what the -study was predicting. But the very last row in Ghat table will show you the traffic numbers that we believe. could potentially be generated wifh this .expansion. And, like I said earlier, this is a very conservative estimate because you're adding one drive-through window to an existing bank that likely has their clientele base already built up. So these numbers should be pretty conservative. And they would also take into consideration any expansion of the actual buildings to a few of the offices that may be built. 'We took these numbers and distributed them out across the intersections and performed an analysis ofthe intersections: If you'll look on Table 2, which is on the following page, it gives yo;u a brief summary of-the restalts of that analysis. The first raw is the Old 8610akdale signalized intersection. You can see that existing in the morning, it a;perates at a level of service B, which'is quite good. Now, please understand that the side streets-are given less green time because they have Tess traffic on them. So they would experience a little bit more delay than the traffic on Old 86, which is given more of the green time. But, as you can ee, it operates at a level of sen+ice B in thee: morning and afternoon. And when you add in the expansion of the Credit Union, you can see the: levels of service all remain.. the same. And the numerical values in parentheses are' the delay calculations -the average delay experienced by a vehicle in seconds. And you can see there is very little change there. You're taking a relatively small increase in traffic and you're spreading it out aver these two intersections, the two. driveways, and as a result, you're not increasing. traffic a great deal there. This analysis that we looked of does consider that there isone driveway, the existing driveway, on 01d 86 is a full access.. So, it remains 'allowing less in and less:out in the future. And., one thing.. I'd like to point out is if that is made: into aright-in and right-out, what you will have is -Like the ,gentleman that asked about earlier, `How would the vehicles get: in and out?'-The vehicles to exit wanting to go-.back north on Old 86 aregoing to have to use the:0akdale driveway. And,'you can -see, if you lookon Figure 1,,which is on the following page, that has the existing traffic volumes at the Oakdale/Old 86 intersection. If you'll look specifically at the left turn from Oakdale onto northbound Old 86s there are 140 cars in the morning and -112 in the afternoon. That volume is going to increase. l know that I said earlier that minor street movem°ent is given less green time. because the traffic on O(d 86 is heavier. And if you force those cars to turn, to go out the old Oakdale Road driveway, they're going to have to turn left from Oakdale onto Old 86 at the: light where they're going to .have some delay there, instead of going out onto OId 86. If you're going o increase thaftraffic, and they're already given less:green ime there, it's going to increase that delay. And sort ofthe same is true for the vehicles coming from the south on Old 86 wanting to turn left into the Credit Union. You're going to farce them to go up to the signal, make a left. there, where they're currently not provided a protected movement, according to what I ee on the signal plans. They don't have a green arrow, so they're not going solely as an exclusive movement. They`re having to wait for gaps in the southbound traffic to try to make that left turn movement:. And that's not ideal for the left:'turns to do. 50 it's pretty much the same situation you have down at the southern driveway. But there is storage available in the turn lane, in the middle turn lane there, for those cars to get out of through traffic, which is a plus. So, you wouldn't be forcing those :cars to go up to the signal, make a left and.. then come in off of Oakdale if we allowed the intersection to remain full access.... I' also should -point out, that when these improvements come in by DOT or the TIP Project is built in the future, you're going o have an improved cross section there that is able to carry the traffic: more efficiently. So, it won't be as big a deal for those cars to go-out to Oakdale atthe intersection... You're going to have more through. lanes there for the traffic on Old 86 o clear that intersection quicker:. So; it wouldn't be as bad to send those cars out the Oakdale driveway. Hunter Schofield; We've gat one more member representing the applicant, Jay W. Smith.. Jay S"mith: I have nothing to add. Hunter Schofield: Nothing: to add. Thank you. We wantto go ahead and direct any questions to the applicants at this point before we turn to anyone who might wish to speak in apposition to this :application... Jonathan Parsons:: Right now-it's, on;peak days, two to three,. and that's what we :anticipate for the remote office.. Sam Lasrs: How many-employees work inside the bank? Jonathan Parsons:;: At the islands inside? That's about seven, sa full'-time. Hunter Schofield:. Otherquestions from the Planning Board? Barry Katz: When we talking about traffic moving in and out of the CreditUnion but Old 86 is becoming a more heavily trafficked road and (suppose-everybody expects and hopes that there. will be more commercial development in the area that has been zoned for commercial development there: And the number of cars on that road, one would expect to increase. I know through Hillsborough there is a possibility of something like 96,000 trips a day or something. My point is that if you have cars that are not trying to get into the credit union, you: have a higher burden of traffic going past the credit union; then people trying to make left-turns. are going.. to find more and more difficulty to make a left turn safely at the entrance that you :currently have. And i know you're: looking to the traffic improvements that will happen in 201.0 or thereabouts to sort of dissolve the flow of traffic past there, but the recommendation. was o actually make right turns only on Old 8~ in order to-avoid the left turn problem. I hink that the'left turn problem will quickly become-a problem:. before 2010 .because of the volume increase in traffic. 1 would strongly support the idea of the recommendation that the Planning Department has made.: Rynal Stephenson: One thing 1' would like tp Sayabout that is that when you have cars turning'lefk in or left out of the southern, existing;driveway, the traffic signatup at Oakdale will stop traffic in the sou#hbound direction and northbound direction. And, when that outhbound traffic is sto-peed, that will allow gaps in that traffic for'the cars to turn left out, and either get i;n the centerturn lane, and far the traffic coming up from-the south, wanting to turn left in, they'll have pretty much a clear shot into the Credit Union; That's not as critical a movement as the left turn out. But, one benefit of having a traffic signal at the. location that it is, is that it will stop traffic in the southbound and northbound direction, which will°provide some gaps in that traffic stream forthose cars to turn in and out. Barry Katz: How many feet is it between your entrance and exit ...at the traffic light? Jonathan Parsons:: Thee. existing distance is approximately Z00 feet give or'take: Barry Katz; Roughly two cars or something?' Rynal Stephenson: It'susuallyabout 20 to 25 feet per car. Barry Katz: Ok, how .many cars would that: be? Rynal Stephenson:: About eight.: Barry. Katz:: if you're in the eighth car fitting at that traffic light, in traffic, and you couldn't make a left turn onto there:.,... Jonathan: Parsons: You: would still. be able to make a left turn if there are only`eight cars there Rynat Stephenson: Yes you could. And the analysis shows in the print-outs that l have with rne. The analysis print-outs are showing that the queues are going to backup about, I think it's tike a 190 feet or, something like that., Barry Katz;- Ls that right near the one car making a left-hand turn or twa cars making a left when sharing the traffic light when the traffic light is red? Jonathan Parsons: That's assuming there's a full. back up on Oakdale;.. Rynal Stephenson: That number I quoted' you, 190 feet, is what they-calla `95"' percentile queue, -which is the, it's not maybe the max,. but it's sort of the worst case scenario during'the heaviestl5 minutes of the heaviest hour: Barry Katz:. I don't want: to belabor it at all, but 1 anticipate Hillsborough traffic -Old 8G traffic -will increase significantly, and' hat's my opinion. Rynal Stephenson: Yes, I justwanted to point out about the sgnaC. Ted TriebeL• A couple of general questions onthe-traffic. You took cone-day look:af this on a Thursday. Is-that standard procedure, to take aone-day traffic count and then to generalize that to 365 days? Rynaf Stephenson.: Yes; sir. Well, it's just typically what the profession does, yes, sir. It's the traffic data collection is very expensive. You know to have someone., you know, sitting out there: counting all these intersections, you know, for days at a time, and that's accepted in the .profession. Yes: 'Ted Treibel: '1 understand why you wouldn't pick a peak day -the 15"' ar the 30t"'-but is there any reason why you_pick a Thursday, aid why didn't you pick a Friday, orsome other day? Rynal Stephenson: UUell in a typical weekday, you can. see, too, that the :traffic numbers that we counted were higher in the morning than the study had predicted and .pretty close in the afternoon, so, we feel that it was a pretty typical weekday. And, it may not be the 15~' or the 30~', but it's a typicai.weekday. Sam Lasris: What advantage does the Credit Union get out of °people using their cars for banking as opposed to going inside. Is there a :definite advantage to the GreditUnion to have people banking in their cars? ...Jonathan Parson; There is a definite advantage, I mean, you .can only have so many people inside the building at any one time.. Whereas, in the cars........... Sam Lasris: You could expand your bank. I think the thing that bothers me'is that we're always expanding to accorrmmodate automobile traffic rather than,to accommodate people,. Jonathan Parsons: The opposite way to look at that, the more-:people you put inside the: building, the larger parking lot you will need, vice versa. The: more traffic you have stalling into the parking lot.... You'd stilt: have, to have parking for those"cars,: though. You'd have 20 people to handle, or 30 people. Jay Smith: My name is Jay Smith with O'Brien Atkins Associates, and I'm representing the applicant. The thing that I would. like to add to that conversation, or that comment you made, is that. the clientele of banking: -you maybe the exception -are wanting to have their transactions acquired quicker. And so that's why the advent of teller lanes and ATM lanes and alt these, the `car, the vehicle for getting your transactions done is becoming more popular. So, the Credit Union is not alone, and many banks are approaching #heir business in this manner. Commissioner Jaeobs: I'll walk--until we getto ask our questions after they're finished.:.. Noah Ranells: Was there any delay on the first day turning leftonto :86 due-to traffic? Rynal Stephenson.: I was not there counting the traffic, but ourtraffic counters didn't notice any unusual delays oranythtng out of the ordinary. Noah Ranells: Is that requested information? Rynal Stephenson: Yes they know to look for those things. They're trained to look for those-sort of things. We don't have an exact number of vehicles. They're°not' able to ime the delay for the cars, but they do observe traffic patterns while they are out there:. Jay Smith: C7ne final point. In your packet is a letter from the forth Carolina Department of Transportation. lt's a November letter... On page two of that -essentially what the Credit Union is :asking: is that you consider whaf the North Carolina Department of Transportation is recommending:.. It's an acknowledgement"that 86 is getting busier. However, it's not until sometime later that the right-in and right-out would be needed. The Credit Union is simply asking. far that convenience for their customers, that the existing`full service entrance that they have now be maintained during that time. The Credit Union is completely willing to, at some time later in the future, when those numbers have warranted such, that the right-in right-out be imposed upon them. As stated earlier,. it's also at that time that the new° entrance opposite the Millstone facility may be in-place and then further improve access to those groups of properties.. Noah Ranells: We are dealing. with air quality issues in this County and it's having. an impact on everything we do. Opening up another lane with concern for idling vehicle , I'm wondering if of the development sites you have considered air pollution concerns in developing whether there ate any opportunities. Jay Smith: Quite honestly,the addition of the ATM lane will reduce that. The same number of cars trying to<get through fewer ATM lanes or teller lanes will be idling`longer than more throughways-where `they'll be :processing themselves quicker. Noah Ranells: It does: (The clerk swore in Randall Wellman.:) Randall Wellborn: My name is. Randall Wellbum and I work for the State .Employees' Credit. Union.: Hunter Schofield: Was there a comment that you wanted to respond ta. Randall Wellborn: How long would it be until the same wait time with 15 to 20 cars. I just didn't want tto sound like there's 15 to 20 cars there. It's just on peak days such as teacher pay days, or the 15`h and 30th that were mentioned? Hunter Schofield: Just a note to the Planning Board to keep in mind that this will. be returning to us in the period of one to two months for deliberation within the Planning Board as to the merits of this proposal. So this would not, of course, be our only opportunity to weigh in on this application before us,tonight. With. that being said,... we're. still open to questions. Yes, Mr. Katz. Barry Katz: Are there any sites around there that are available for commercial base of food stores or anything else of that nature? Robert Davis: The ED-LO is the base district in that area. It has some components.. It's mostly limited' office. But you do have undeveloped property down in the business park. And- down the road there is the potential for the planned development through Hillsborough,. the Waterstane Project. Barry Katz: So, if they have an increase in residents, and with the possibility that without a .supermarket developed in there in that stretch or something that could dramatically increase the traffic here in this area, you are basically working,in a retail vacuum over there. Nothing lrt there., you know? And.: with the potential that the customer base is there, you may well have an emergence of retail space there which will dramatically change all your traffic patterns one day: Robert Davis.: Right. Plus, you also have the fact that this is not a funded improvement through the NCDOT, so it could go quite a while before it gets improved, and the traffic would increase:. Normally when you get to'the 125 percent capacity, you get a road maybe five years later. So, we're looking at that too: It could be a long time before you see an improvement. That is why we were recommending the turning movements-now but that will be the Board's choice. Commissioner Halkiotis: I just wanted to make;a quick observation. I may be the only member of this Board who does his banking at the Credit Union. This Board doesn't include you Hunter Schofield. I'm just talking about Commissioners with all due respect. And, I've got to tell you guys,: I have .never come in on the Hwy 86 side. I thinkthe safe driving technique tells you to come in from Oakdale. And I exit out Oakdale whenever I can. I think that has been one of the issues all along. I think the DOT's idea about right in and right out is right°for right now and forget about ten years from now. You guys may not like that, but I go in and out of there at least once or twice week. And when all the parking spaces are filled up in there, as hey usually are, and those people at the teller windows, they're inside conducting business. You people are doing a big business down there. And it's my opinion, you don't have enough parking spaces so people'. can turn their engines off and go inside. And when you've got a couple of cars you're selling because people couldn't make their payments, you lose a couple of parking spaces there, because you've got them? in a lot with a For Sale-sign on them. You have got to look at what you're doing because we need every parking space we can get so people can turn their engines off. But for somebody who uses it day in and day out on this Board of Commissioners, Oakdale, in my opinion, is the way to go for right stow. It's the safest way in and the safest way out. Commissioner Jacobs: I have questions for our Staff if we're done with the applicant. Jonathan Parsons'::: If'I could make this one response to Mr. Halkiotis"comments? I just want to quickly. address the parking issue directly. With the plan that we are proposing right now-with the middle parking bay, moving all the staff parking from the lower lot up into that area, we are trying to add as much parking as is possibly allowed by the existing Ordinance. Albeit limitations by impervious soil, storm water, .etc., so we are addressing the parking demands directly by at least gettingall the staff`and the one or two impounded cars out of that mainstay and helping -clear up the circulation as well from the entrance on 86. So, right now,:-there are currently some- people that parallel parkin that driveway. By doing the plan with the parking we're showing, we're ,anticipating eliminating all of that driveway congestion, which will also make that existing drive function much:.. safer and cleaner, as well as helping the Oakdale drive:. Hunter Schofield: 1 have one>quick question for the applicants:. No one's discussed, that 1've heard about, 'incidents of'traffic accidents at that 86 access. Can anyone speak to that? Jonathan Parsons: When I spoke with Mr. Tapp, who is the Public Safety Reviewer for Orange County, he dial not bring:anything to our attention. He felt that the current site planand the new site plan both functioned., albeit not a perfect situation; there was nothing he brought up specifically telling me that there are issues. And that is why we got theirapproval straight out. He was happier to see :our new traffic pattern with the four-way access bypass fame on the far side as welE. ice-Chair Scofield: What about your own experience? Can you speak at all to that. Jonathan Parsons:. 15 odd trips to Hillsborough..: Hunter Schofield: I'm also a member of the Credit Unio , but I was looking if there was someone who actually'works at the Credit Union at this particular location,..: if they' in `any way°had any anecdotal observations that might give us some insight in terms of the potential hazard ar,lack thereof that that access currently creates: Randall Weliburn: 'No. l don't think we have anything. There have been no accidents out front that we're aware of"at all. Hunter Schofield:: During what: period of time?' Randal Well'burn: Since: we moved in June 1999: Hunter Schofrelds OK, Thank you. That was my question. Rynal Stephenson, The NCDOT also maintains the crash data.. We could get a report from them.. It would probably take a week or so to get that from hem. Hunter Schofield: 1 just thought that was germane, so I thought I'd ask the question. Any other questions before we let the applicants take their seats? 4. Statements in oapositon to the aroposa( {Planning Board Chair will ask each them "Have they been sworn in?" and c,f so, ..proceed; if not the Clerk will swear them in.} There was no one to speak ih opposition to the proposal': 5. Rebuttal s#atements by suaaorters. (Planning 'Board Chair will ask each of them "Have they been sworn in?" and if so, .proceed; if not the Clerk will wear them in.} °!None. fi. Rebuttal statement by the opposition. (P'lanning Board Chair will ask each of them "Have they been sworn in?" and if so, ..proceed; if not the,Clerk:will swear #hem in.} None. Commissioner Jacobs: First'1 want to ask questions about something that Com'missioner' Halkiotis just said. Are there in fact cars for sale that are parked. on this property and would that be consistent with the zoning? Robert Davis: No that would not be consistent with the zoning... We'II have `to look at that. Commissioner Halkiotis: I didn't mean to blow the whistle on anybody, you know. I always follow the righteous path.:.. Commissioner Jacobs: I wish you woultl look into that and tacking about having access kind of in tMe middle where it would' be more dangerous, more movements going in both directions::.. So could you please just;talk about the thinking behind. that? Robert Davis; You're speaking of the access back off of Oakdale all ahe way to the back? Commissioner Jacobs::. Correct;:. Robert Davst Even if'you look at the existing site, you can see that there's a retaining wall there where They have done quite a bit of cut into that area. And they were looking at the prospect of doing more cutting on that site to do that. We preferred, actually, the rear access for the ioterconnectivity back there. That was. not well. received, and there was going to be a lot more dirt to be moved,., and probably a loss of more trees,<akhough it looks like they have got most of them on the back, at least where the driveway is. They still own some of that property back up on the top of the map, back over tothe west. But ideally, a road back there-could. serve this tract, the adjacent south tract, and also the western tract. Commissioner Jacobs:. To me, this is an example: of how we make anecdotal decisions that destroy any comprehensive planning opportunities. Because if, say there was a light at Millhouse, artd then somebody wanted to go over°to Oakdale by not going on Old 86, it would be so dangerous as to virtually be eliminated as a possibility to have to I®ave through the middle of properties. and through the traffic-coming, even if these is a rightturn in and a right turn out, as opposed to going. along the northern portion of the property -the western portion, excuse me._ Robert Davis;:.. Right. We would have encouraged traffic that is already in .there to have; different options to go out, but no# someone to cut through Mil stone and weave their way through.:. You could still take that road: across, :but it would have to quickly move up to the property line to get .around over to service. That whole portion of property back there is owned, I think, by one: individual, all the way down to Cornwallis Hills. They would need access to come through from MiNstone to tie into that.. But, it was basically a grade issue. We originally started out with all thee: connectivity: in the back, but with the queuing up from the folks going through the ATM,. they were backing up into your iwo-way traffic. It did not function like we would have liked to have seen it. You were having people sitting there queued up to go into the ATM and into the drive-throughs backed up into thetwo-way traffic lane in the back, so they proposed something upfront, which has its own drawbacks because you` have people leaving, such as not paying attention jsticking their money in their wallets) pulling out, and you have traffic coming across the front.:. Commissioner Jacobs::. I would hope hat the Planning ,Board and the S#aff and the Commissioners would consider adding astub-out there, so that if we decided that was more optimal' in the future, we had not precluded that possibility. Now, one thing thaf was mentioned, is there or is there not aright-of-way dedicated on Oakdale at' the intersection with; Old 86? Robert Davis: One of the DOT comments was to dedicate a site distance triangle up a# the corner there, which tells me that that was done but this did not pick up the 86 right-of-way,.: but they"ve dedicated their portion there on weir ide, at least:. Commissioner.Jacobs: So, we're sure then. that you could put a right turn, or, at least a #aper in there a#this time. Robert Davis: You may have to go curb and gutter for drainage purposes but the cross-section is wide enough --it's generally 12-foot {antis. Twelve, twelve, twelve, and then; #urn lane -right; lane - '12 -that's 3fi feet. And you have a 55 foot right-of-way.. Commissioner Jacobs:. Because one of the things #hat having: a right turn there would do would be to address some of the concerns that were raised about making a left turn at that light.- Because, since there's no option but o sit there until you get #o the light to make a right turn, it queues the traffic way more than it has to. I spoke at the '[997"Public Hearing, and Orange County's Transportation Planner at that time said it wasn't necessary. I think it's an example of how,. when we don't look ahead, the problems are created. Were there a right turn lane .there now, people wouldn't drive through the swell' o make it anyway. I would suggest that we talk with DOT about whether there will be - we had mentioned this. to them -whether there would be money available under NC Moving Ahead, if in fact we do have adequate right-of-way, to have that paved.:, without asking the applicant to pave it I`think that ought to be,part of this process,. that we have that discussion, about- how we're going to require or acquire a righttum' lane there, because I think that will-address some of those questions about if we're moving the traffic so tha#:'it goes out to the traffic light.: And I use that intersection a> lot.. The way I look at that, the existing driveway on Old 86 lines up with the existing driveway on the Citgo. Am I correct? There's no control of access there, so you. have people making opposite left turns :going across traffic, one of the most highly traveled roads in this part of the County. And. just because NCDQT does things in a stupid way doesn't mean that we have to perpetuate it. If that's their recommendation, fine. But drive up Churton Street. There: are all sorts of examples of -this. The taperforthe left:-turn lane starts almost at that same point. S'o you have people who think: they're moving left, to get in the left turn lane, people turning left, people turning left,. and people coming this way.. As Barry said, as it ge#s more highly trafficked, it just gets worse. To say that it's programmed without funding, is to say that we wish it will. be true but there's no guarantee that that's going to happen. And I think, that where it's within our purview - we saw this with the Super Wal-Mart -which was not within our purview -where it's within our purview, and we carrsee a way to make a traffic improvement,. in advance of when DOT might get the funding five or ten or fifteen years from now, we ought to go ahead and do it., There's a 2300 square foo# house on the new lot, is: that correct'? Robert Davis: No the house, t call`it a Cape Cod, as you come out of Millstone on the southern tract, there is a small structure there right now. They had talked about moving, or allowing it to be moved. There was some discussion. 1 don't know if they are still on that track or not. They had, at least one of the gentlemen with the Credit Union was open to that.,: It could be. It seems to be in fairly good: shape. It could be moved. Commissioner Halkiotis There are two different structures there. There is a house and a workshop out back: So, which:one are you talking about? Robert Davis: The house is the one I'm speaking of. Commissioner Jacobs::: I'm just asking what's on ithere. Robert Davis: Yes.:, there's an existing structure.. Commissioner Halkiotis: There's a good size garage-workshop, freestanding, out back: Commissioner Jacobs. I assume that we would require that it be deconstructed if it wasn't removed, Robert Davis: We `haven't addressed that. We can add that as a condition.. Commissioner Jacobs: I' would certainly want to add that. Just a couple more comments. I was taking notes about the right-in and the right-out, which I also support. Those of you who drive on Old 86, there's alert-turn lane into Cornwallis Hills. DOT did not require that. It didn't think it was necessary when Cornwallis Hills was built. The Orange County Planning Board thought that it was necessary. The.. County Commissioners agreed. And I think anybody who drives through there, is very glad there's: a left turn: lane there for Cornwallis Hills. The whole discussion that we had in working on the Economic Development District, regarding the limitation on` drive-throughs, was exactly what you said, Sam. We are trying to change the way that people do business. For better or for worse, we're in an air quality non-attainment area, and to me, to build more drtve-through lanes is only to encourage people to stay in their cars, as opposed to, since the standards require a certain amount of parking, to meet the square footage of the building. The idea is, presumably, that you can accommodate business inside. That's why we have parking standards. So i don't see a need to increase drive-through lanes. In fact, I think it's sending a message that we're not very serious about the standards that we set if we're going to actually expand the use. I'd just as soon see banks without the drive-through. I've forced myself to get out of my car at the bank I use so that I don't contribute to the problem. And I certainly wouldn't want to, as an elected official, vote to make the problem worse., Hunter Schofield: Othercomments-from the Commission?' Any comments from members of the Planning Board? Sam Lasris; Were the residents notified of this action? Robert Davits: Yes-sir, it's in the packet. And there is a certification letter in there that they were notified. Sam Lasris: Was this their only chance to respond? Robert Davis: No, they getto go to the Planning Board. There was a public ad and also a sign pasted on the property. They can still come to the Planning Board, provided all comments are in writing after this meeting,. Hunter Schofield: I think we're ready to proceed`. Commissioner Gordon.. Comm°issioner Gordon:: I'm .ready for a motion to accept the Planning Staff's recommendation to refer the proposed Zoning Atlas Amendment and proposed Class A Special Use Permit to the Planning Board fora recommendation to be returned to the Commissioners no sooner than January. 26th, 2004... A motion was made by `Commissioner Halkiotis, seconded by Commissioner Jacobs to accept the Planning Staff s recommendation to refer the proposed Zoning Atlas Amendment' and proposed Class A Special Use Permit to the Planning Boartl fora recommendation to be returned to the BOCC no sooner than January 26, 2004. VOTE: UNANIMOUS 2. Concurrent TextAmendments to the Orange.. County Zoning Ordinance and Orange County Subdivision Regulations a. Tent amendments to require a subdivision located in more than one zoning district including a subdivision located in more than one overlay district or a subdivision located in anon-overlay district and an overlay district to go through the planned devaloprhent rezoning process. Craig Benedict said that this item has more speck language to clarify requirements and identify thresholds. The item is on a blue handout. This item came up with the discussions of the new growth. management standards, which set thresholds based on location and amount of lots. There was a :question when there are subdivisions that may intersect two watersheds, there are some :inconsistencies between the land uses that can occur between the two overlay districts, impervious area: requirements, or density changes. He pointed out a map with all. of the watersheds:. The hope is to have less inconsistencies among the borders and to have better transitions: This amendment is an attempt'to bring forward for subdivisions that.: are over six lots in the major subdivision process. (rezoning or special use permit process). Also, if an applicant that spans the two districts uses the lower density or the more. restrictive land use regulations (impervious or-land use) then they would not have to go through a rezoning. process. 'Hunter Schofield clarified that we have now .given landowners who happen to reside on a piece.. of :property that share joint zoning jurisdictions the option of selecting a more restrictive zoning jurisdiction and developing under the rules and regulations set forth under that more restrictive- zoning district. A motion was made by Commissioner Jacobs,: seconded by commissioner Carey to consider a motion to accept the Administration's recommendation to refer the proposed. amendments to the Planning.: Board.. for a recommendation to be returned to the BOCC no later than January 26, 2004.. VOTE: 'UNANIMOUS