Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutRES-2003-069 MTIP Resolutions Endorsing Orange County Transportation Priority List for 2006-2012 TIP`o _ z~- ~,~~ 3 ORANGE COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS `sb A RESOLUTION CONCERNING PROJECTS TO BE CONSIDERED FOR INCLUSION IN THE 2006 - 2012 DURHAM-CHAPEL HILL-CARRBORO METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM WHEREAS, the North Carolina Board of Transportation and the Durham-Chapel Hill- Carrboro Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO), every two years, prepares a Transportation Improvement Program that identifies transportation projects scheduled for State and Federal funding over the next seven years; and WHEREAS, the North Carolina Board of Transportation and the MPO solicits input for identifying transportation projects of local and regional importance to be included in the FY 2006-2012 Transportation Improvement Program; and WHEREAS, Orange County, as a member of the Durham-Chapel Hill-Carrboro Metropolitan Planning Organization, will continue to work with the Transportation Advisory Committee (DCHC TAC) to develop a complete list of project priorities for the portion of Orange County that lies inside the urbanized area boundary; and WHEREAS, Orange County gives priority to identified safety needs on existing roads and bridges, to other transportation projects that encourage alternatives to automobile travel, to projects that minimize adverse impacts on the natural environment and cultural sites, and to those projects that foster economic development in the designated Economic Development Districts; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Orange County Board of Commissioners that: 1. The Board of County Commissioners endorses the attached priority list of transportation projects to be considered for inclusion in the FY 2006-2012 Transportation Improvement Program; and 2. The Board of County Commissioners provides the attached comments concerning .local transportation projects contained in the 2004-2010 DCHC Metropolitan Transportation Improvement Program. Upon motion of Commissioner ,seconded Commissioner the foregoing resolution was adopted this the ~[_ day of~~~?-x-2003 I, Donna Baker, Clerk to the Board of Commissioners for the County of Orange, .North Carolina, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing is a true copy of so much of the proceedings of said Board at a meeting held on October 21, 2003, as relates in any way to the adoption of the foregoingr at said proceedings are recorded in the minutes of said ~r ~P~.e ~`~ ~ Board. a~ ~;.., c~F~ ~ WITNESS my hand an~ ~t~ - , i County, this~_ day of ,.2003. 4 ~ ~~ Ey , ~1~~°`~ k z :r,~ ~ ,~-- ,~ ~ ~`~ ~ ~ ~ Clerk o the Board of Commissioners ,;}tea °~art ORANGE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION PRIORITY LIST FOR CONSIDERATION OF FUNDING IN THE 2006 - 209.2 DURHAM-CHAPEL HILL-CARRBORO METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZION TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 1. SR 1006, Orange Grove Road, at Interstate 40: Construct a pedestrian bridge over I-40. New Grady Brown Elementary and newly constructed Cedar Ridge High School are located on New Grady Brown School Road which has access from Orange Grove Road south of I-40. The schools are within walking and cycling distance from residential areas north of I-40. Bicyclists and pedestrian must share the roadway with motor vehicles crossing the narrow two-lane bridge that carries Orange Grove Road over Interstate 40. The bridge is too narrow to accommodate a pedestrian walkway. Lack of an adequate pedestrian .crossing presents an unsafe environment for students to walk to the schools. 2. U-2805: Homestead Road (SR 1777) Improvements: Improve Homestead Road from SR 1$34, High School Road, to NC 86. This project should include bicycle and pedestrian facilities. There are three schools in the vicinity of Homestead Road: Chapel Hill High School, Smith Middle School and Seawell Elementary School. Many students live within walking distance and cycling distance to Chapel Hill High School and must walk or cycle along Homestead Road, and cross the road daily. Provision of sidewalks is of utmost importance for the safety of students and other pedestrians who use this corridor. Provision of bicycle facilities is, likewise, necessary far the safety of students and others. This project should also include appropriate safety improvements to the intersection of Homestead Road with High School Road and the intersection of Homestead Road with Seawell School Road. Both of those intersections are near public schools. 3. NC 86, Bicycle Lanes: Construct bicycle lanes (4-foot paved shoulders) from Chapel Hill (Whitfield Road) to Hillsborough (US 70 Business). This project will extend bicycle lanes on Airport Road (NC86) in Chapel Hill to US 70 Business in Hillsborough. Bicycle lanes have recently been completed along NC 86 from UNC to Whitfield Road (SR 1731) in Orange County. NC 86 from Chapel Hill to Hillsborough is experiencing increasing numbers of bicyclists using this route and there are also two schools along this route. This route is listed as priority I of the primary bicycle routes proposed in the Orange County Bicycle Transportation Plan adopted April 6, 1999. This project is listed in the 2002-2008 TIP, as an incidental bicycle need. Orange County requests that bicycle lanes be constructed as an independent project, and, if necessary, programmed in phases. ORANGE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION PRIORITY LIST 2006 - 2012 DCHC MTIP 4. Old NC 86 (SR 1009~Bicycle Lanes: Construct bicycle lanes (4-foot paved shoulders) from Carrboro (Eubanks Road) to Hillsborough (i-40). This project, from the Carrboro Transition area (Hickory Forest Road) to Lafayette Drive, is priority 6 of the primary bicycle routes listed in the Orange County Bicycle Transportation Plan, and would extend bicycle accommodations requested in TIP Project R-2825 to Carrboro, where its Transportation Advisory Committee has also established bicycle routes on Old NC 86 as a transportation priority connection between proposed bicycle facilities along Old Fayetteville Road, Homestead Road and Eubanks Road. The feasibility study for TIP Project R-2825, improvements to South Churton Street, recommends afour-lane divided section for Old NC 86 (S. Churton St.) from I-40 to Lafayette Drive. That study also anticipates accommodations for bicycles (wide outside lanes) from I-40 to I-85. This project would connect bicycle facilities proposed in the South Churton Street project to Carrboro. Carrboro's Transportation Advisory Committee has recommended bicycle lanes along Old NC 86 in two separate requests for Carrboro's Priority List for the 2006-2012 TIP: • from Old Fayetteville Road to Homestead Road; and • from Homestead Road to Eubanks Road. 5. R-2825 Improvements to South Churton Street: Develop congestion management, limited access, aesthetic and capacity improvements between US 70 Business and Interstate 40. The portion between Interstates 40 and 85 will conform to the design criteria of the Economic Development District Design Manual (4-lane divided section with bike and pedestrian improvements). The feasibility study completed in February 2002 recommends a 4-lane divided, with 16-foot median, curb and gutter cross section for the entire corridor from I-40 to Eno River. Orange County stresses the need to study improvements within the current right-of-way for the segment north of Interstate 85. Improved capacity through widening is not the County's first choice because of significant constraints between Interstate 85 and US 70 Business and the proximity of the historic district north of the project limits. Orange County requests that, where conditions do not prevent the addition of frontage roads, the feasibility study include the addition of frontage roads with limited access from the corridor: 6. US 70 Bypass Widening: Widen, from the Orange/Durham County Line to the US 70 - I-85 Connector east of Efland, US 70 Bypass to a four-lane divided section with bike and pedestrian improvements. This project should be phased to address traffic counts and existing congestion. Orange County requests that this project be identified as a need and included in the 2006- 2012 STIP. 2 ORANGE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION PRIORITY LIST 2006 - 2012 DCHC MTIP 7: NC 86 (North of Hillsborough) .Improvements: Widen NC 86, from US 70 Bypass north of Hillsborough to SR 1332, Coleman Loop (Coleman Loop also being the intersection area of the planned connector between NC 86 and NC 57), to four lanes with intersection improvements at US 70 Bypass. NC 86 is the major north-south route through Orange County. NC 57 converges into US 86 just north of US 70 Bypass. The segment of NC 86 between NC 57 and US 70 is congested, rendering a high accident location at the intersection of US 70 Bypass at NC 86. Development pressures in this area will exacerbate traffic congestion and acciden# proliferation. 3 ORANGE COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS COMMENTS REGARDING THE 2004 -2010 DURHAM-CHAPEL HILL-CARRBORO METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZION TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 1. Comments on Proiect U-3808 Elizabeth Brady Road Extension A. The Orange County Board of Commissioners is pleased that bicycle and pedestrian facilities have been included in the Elizabeth Brady Road Extension project connecting US 70 Business with US 70 Bypass. The Board requests that the 2004- 2010 DCHC Metropolitan Transportation Improvement Program use the following alignment and cross section for the project. 1. An alignment that has the least impact on the Eno River, the natural environment and cultural sites. 2. An alignment that does not cross the Eno River, but is aligned along the ridge south of the river (if that alignment has the least impact on the natural environment and cultural sites). This recommendation is in accordance with the Economic Development District Transportation Work Group priority order by preference of options to be studied for environmental analysis. 3. A road configuration of two lanes with right-of-way reserved for four lanes (four lanes if necessary). The Board further stresses that it does not endorse the alternative for this project that proposes a western bypass of Hillsborough with an interchange at I-40/I-85 that would impact the critical area of the Upper Eno Watershed. B. An Economic Development District (EDD) Transportation Work Group made up of Orange County and Town of Hillsborough elected officials, planning staff, developers and community groups was established to address transportation issues regarding the Hillsborough area EDD. That group's recommendations and comments regarding the planning and design of this project were submitted on December 3, 2001, as part of Orange County's Transportation Priority List for Consideration of Funding in the 2004 -2010 Transportation Improvement Program. 2. Comments On Other Tip Projects Initiated By NCDOT A. I-3306 Section A: widening of I-40 to six lanes from I-85 in Orange County to NC 147 (Buck Dean Freeway) in Durham County. The Orange County portion of this project is currently listed in the TIP as an unfunded project; however, this project is nearing completion (scheduled for .2004) in Durham County. Project planning and design for this facility was completed for both phases of the project and the environmental studies rendered a Categorical Exclusion (CE) in 2000. The studies for the project in Orange County should be reviewed prior to construction, especially with respect to the recently completed study concerning high occupancy vehicle (HOV) lanes. ORANGE COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS COMMENTS REGARDING THE 2004 -2010 DCHC MTIP Orange County is opposed to any widening of I-40 through Orange County unless there is a commitment by NCDOT to provide HOV and/or dedicated bus lanes. Transportation modeling studies indicate that the existing four-lane section from I-85 to NC 86 may be adequate to handle projected future traffic, but HOV lanes, along with widening to a six-lane section for general traffic, will be needed to help alleviate congestion from NC 86 to Wake County. Orange County requests that, if funding cannot be secured through another project, this project include widening the bridge on Orange Grove Road over I-40 to provide safe access for bicycle and pedestrian traffic over the interstate as recommended in the (2002) Orange Grove Road Study executed by a joint committee made up of Orange County and Town of Hillsborough Commissioners and staff from Orange County and Hillsborough Planning Departments, Orange County Economic Development Department, and NCDOT. Orange County also requests that NCDOT provide aesthetic landscaping at interchanges for this project. B. I-305: widening of I-85 to six lanes and reconstruction of intercha at Hillsborough to Durham County Line Orange County is opposed to any widening of I-85 through Orange County unless there is a commitment by NCDOT to provide HOV and/or dedicated bus lanes. This project is programmed for planning in FFY 04, design in FFY 06 with construction to start in FFY 10. Orange County requests the following infrastructure improvements as they relate to the I-85/US 70 Economic Development District. 1. Erosion Control Measures -Orange County requests that NCDOT provide permanent erosion control measures throughout the project. 2. Landscaping of Interchanges -Orange County requests that NCDOT landscape all reconstructed interchanges in an aesthetic manner. 3. Pedestrian and Bicycle Facilities -Orange County requests that NCDOT consult County staff in the determination of where and what type of facilities are to be included in this project. Among the features requested for inclusion are sidewalks and bike lanes (see the Regional Bicycle Plan for Durham and Orange Counties) along roads where interchange improvements are required and adequate guardrails on overpasses. 4. Wildlife Corridor Under I-85 (in the vicinity of US70 Interchange) -Orange County requests that NCDOT consult County staff during the planning stage, and that this issue be brought to the attention of the NCDOT Staff Biologist. 2 ORANGE COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS COMMENTS REGARDING THE 2004 -2010 DCHC MTIP Constructing this wildlife corridor is one of the recommendations presented in the "The New Hope Corridor Open Space Master Plan: Proposals for Linking Duke Forest and Eno River State Park." Orange County also requests that NCDOT consult county staff in designing the interchange at US 70 to provide a pedestrian trail under I-85 linking New Hope Creek and the Eno River (New Hope Rustic Woodland Trail proposed as an element of the Lands Legacy Program). 5. Intersection of Pleasant Green Road (SR 1567) & Mt Herman Church Road SR 1713 - NCDOT Division 7 Traffic Engineers have recommended that this intersection be included as a part of I-305 because of its proximity to the I- 85/US 70 interchange. The entire intersection should be realigned so that Pleasant Green Road intersects US 70 at a 90-degree angle. 6. US 70 from NC 751 to University Station- Road (SR 1712) -Due to the needs of the Pleasant Green Road\US 70 intersection, Orange County requests that US 70, from NC 751 to University Station Road, be upgraded to provide for a suitable transition from/to I-85. 7. Mt Herman Church Road (SR 1713) -Preliminary plans by the Planning & Environmental Branch, Division of Highways of NCDOT indicate that this road may be relocated as part of I-305. Orange County requests that this road be designed with 12' wide travel lanes and 4' wide bicycle lanes for a total paved width of 32'. 8. Old NC 10 (SR 1710) -Preliminary plans by the Planning & Environmental Branch, Division of Highways of NCDOT indicate that this road may also be relocated as part of I-305. Orange County requests that this road be designed with 12' wide travel lanes and 4' wide bicycle lanes for a total paved width of 32'. . 9. NC 86 - NCDOT has expressed concern that the width (2-lane) of the NC 86 overpass is inadequate for increased traffic volumes that would result from proposed development in the adjacent Economic Development District. Orange County requests that the NC 86 overpass be widened. 3