HomeMy WebLinkAboutORD-2003-030 Stream Classification AmendmentsBOCC Adopted Ordinance ~ Q ,~ _ ~~ ~ ~ ,,, Q 31 O
(With Changes made by BOCC) ~~a QQ _-~~V ~
0
An Ordinance Amending the Zoning Ordinance
Of Orange County
Be it ordained by the Board of Commissioners of Orange County that the Orange
County Zoning Ordinance is hereby amended as follows:
Section 1. Amend Article 22 definition for Stream Buffer to read as follows:
Stream Buffer--A stream buffer is an area of land adjacent to a
streams or a FEMA-identified floodplains,
whichever is greater, which, except as permitted in Article 6.23.7 of this
Ordinance, must remain undisturbed in its natural state. °°,-~,~1
Streams are sfiewr~ identified as by any of the following means: 1)
shown as solid blue lines a~ or as broken blue lines on the USGS
Quadrangle maps, 2) shown as a water feature in the Orange
County Soil Survey, or 3) a water feature identified by a field
determination of County staff trained in surface water
identification through the North Carolina Division of Water Quality
(NCDWQZ. Stream buffers shall extend around the perimeter of all
other water mss-features if any portion of the stream buffer touches
the water ~edy feature. Disputes pertaining to water feature
identification decisions by County staff shall be filed directly to
the NCDWQ. Stream buffers for Soil Survey streams shall only be
calculated using Method A as explained. in Section 6.23.7d.
Section 2. Amend Stream Buffers definition in Article 6.23.7definition to read as
follows:
a) Definition---See Article 22 Stream Buffer
Section 3. Amend Article 22 to add a new definition for Water Feature to read as
follows:
Water Feature-A prominent aspect or characteristic of a
geographic area that exhibits verifiable evidence of a presence of
water in the soil. Examples of water features include, but are not
limited to, perennial and intermittent streams, lakes, ponds,
reservoirs, springs, artesian wells, irrigation wells, marshes or
swamps, wetlands, and natural drainage ditches (non-ephemeral).
Section 4: Amend Section 6.23.10 APPLICABILITY to read as follows:
a) Existing Development
BOCC Adopted Ordinance
(With Changes made by BOCC)
For the purpose of determining compliance with or applicability of
Article 6.23 of this Ordinance, existing development is defined as a
residential or non-residential structure which:
1) was constructed prior to January 1, 1994 (October 19, 1999,
with respect to the October 19, 1999 amendments related to the
CANE-CA and CANE-PW districts; and September 19, 2001
with respect to the Stream Buffer/Usable Lot amendments; and
May 20, 2003 with respect to the Stream Classification
Amendments), or
2) was constructed in accordance with a valid building permit
issued prior to January 1, 1994 (October 19, 1999, with respect
to the October 19, 1999 amendments related to the CANE-CA
and CANE-PW districts and September 19, 2001 with respect to
the Stream Buffer/Usable Lot amendments; and May 20, 2003
with respect to the Stream Classification Amendments) or
3) was included as part of a Site Specific Development Plan
approved by the Board of Commissioners prior to January 1,
1994 (October 19, 1999 with respect to the October 19, 1999
amendments related to the CANE-CA and CANE-PW districts
and September 19, 2001 with respect to the Stream
Buffer/Usable Lot amendments and May 20, 2003 with
respect to the Stream Classification Amendments); or
4) had otherwise established a vested right under North Carolina
Zoning law prior to January 1, 1994 (October 19, 1999 with
respect to the October 19, 1999 amendments related to the
CANE-CA and CANE-PW districts and September 19, 2001
with respect to the Stream Buffer/Usable Lot amendments
and May 20, 2003 with respect to the Stream Classification
Amendments).
Existing development is hereby deemed to be conforming with
respect to requirements of Article 6.23 of this Ordinance. Periodic
updates to FEMA maps may affect structures located within the
floodplain of specific streams. The zoning ordinance text
amendments dated September 19, 2001 and May 20, 2003 only
affect the Stream Buffer section of the ordinance and are not meant
to supersede any FEMA regulations or requirements.
Section 5. Amend Article 6.24.1 Additional Requirements for Lots Outside of
Watershed Protection Areas to read as follows:.
In areas not identified on the Official Zoning Atlas as Watershed
Protection Overlay Districts, a stream buffer a minimum of 50 feet in
width shall be established along both sides of streams s#~ewr} identified
as by any of the following means: 1) shown as solid blue lines a~ or
BOCC Adopted Ordinance
(With Changes made by BOCC)
as broken blue lines on the USGS Quadrangle maps, 2) shown as a
water feature in the Orange County Soil Survey, or 3) a water
feature identified by a field determination of County staff trained in
surface water identification through the North Carolina Division of
Water Quality (NCDWQZ. Stream buffers shall extend around the
perimeter of all other water 13ed+es-features if any portion of the stream
buffer of a "°r°^^i,~ i+r in+°rmi++°n+ stream touches the water bed-y
feature. Disputes pertaining to water feature decisions by County
staff shall be filed directly to the NCDWQ. Stream buffers for Soil
Survey streams shall only be calculated using Method A as
explained in Section 6.23.7d.
Section 6. That this ordinance be placed in the book of published ordinances.
Section 7. This ordinance is effective upon its adoption.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Orange County
Commissioners that this ordinance entitled "An Ordinance Amending the Zoning
Ordinance of Orange County" be adopted.
Upon motion f Commissioner seconded by
Commissioner ,the foregoing ordinance was adopted
this ~ day of , 2003.
I, Donna S. Baker, Clerk to the Board of Commissioners for Orange County, DO
HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing is a true copy of so much of the proceedings of
said Board at a meeting held on , 2003 as relates in any
way to the adoption of the foregoing and hat said proceedings are recorded in the
minutes of the said Board.
WI ESS my hand and the seal of said County, this ~~ day of
2003.
SEAL
Clerk o t Boar of Commissioners
14
C~aQF~-'o2ad,3 -e~.3~
1'.,yjd • .Ldo '~
Commissioner Jacobs said that he has heard some regret that dental facilities were not added
to the Southern Human Services Center. He asked that when the staff discusses the CIP, that they look
at the possibility at the end of the five-year lease having our own dental facilities at the Southern Human
Services Center.
A motion was made by Commissioner Jacobs, seconded by Commissioner Halkiotis to
approve the lease renewal for Carr Mill Mall space as presented and to authorize the Chair to sign on
behalf of the Board.
VOTE: UNANIMOUS
g, Orange County/Hillsborough Courtesy Review Agreement
The Board considered a revised courtesy review agreement with the Town of Hillsborough.
Commissioner Jacobs said that he thought that before Hillsborough was asked to reserve the
utility capacity, this was where the joint meeting was supposed to be held. This is not reflected in this
process. He asked that this be brought back so that this process is clear. Also, there are two senior
housing projects within the County's jurisdiction, both of which have asked for annexation. The Board
has never had an opportunity to comment on these. He would like the Board to look at these two
projects, Waterstone, and The Preserve sometime before Hillsborough makes a decision.
John Link said that the staff could put these on the agenda. There might need to be a special
meeting for this.
Chair Brown suggested having regularly scheduled joint meetings with Hillsborough.
Commissioner Gordon asked for some sort of black lining so that she can tell what was
changed.
The staff will come back with some suggestions for joint meetings with Hillsborough.
This item was deferred.
r. Stream Classification Amendments
The Board considered closing the Public Hearing and making a decision regarding the
proposed Stream Classification Amendments to the Zoning Ordinance.
Commissioner Gordon made reference to pages five and seven and asked about method A.
Craig Benedict said that method A is referenced in another part of the code about taking cross sections
of the stream every 250 feet. It is an existing process about how to calculate stream buffer widths based
on the slope of the banks. Commissioner Gordon asked that this be referenced.
Commissioner Gordon asked about the 65-80-fopt buffers. Craig Benedict said that the 50-
foot requirement applies to areas that are not in protected watersheds. The 65-80-foot buffers is where
there are slopes 7.5% or greater. The amendments have nothing to do with increasing stream buffers,
but identifying streams on soil and water maps.
Commissioner Gordon said that there is a reference to someone being able to ask for a
variance in case the entire property would be taken by these rules. Craig Benedict said that a variance
could be requested down to the minimum that the State requires. In some cases, we exceed the
minimum buffer requirements of the State, which is 30 feet.
Commissioner Gordon is concerned that someone's lot could be made unbuildable. Geof
Gledhill said that there are two levels of variance. A property owner could even go beyond 30 feet if the
application of the dimensional requirement would cause a taking of the property. The principle focus of
this is to guide the development of land and not to take any lots.
Commissioner Jacobs said that a lot of clarification could be achieved if there was a statement
that, "under existing rules...."
A motion was made by Commissioner Jacobs, seconded by Commissioner Carey to approve
the proposed Stream Classification Amendments with the clarifications as suggested above.
VOTE: UNANIMOUS
s. Whiffed Human Services Center Renovation -Authorization to Contract for
Environmental Remediation
The Board considered authorizing the Manager and staff to approve change orders and
execute additional contracts necessary to cant' out the Whitted Human Services Center renovation
project; and authorizing the Purchasing Director and Public Works Director to negotiate and execute a
contract and any related documents with Wildlife Nuisance Control, Inc. in the approximate amount of
$50,000, to carry out environmental remediation work essential to completion of the Whitted Human
8'~