Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
ORD-2003-002 -Senior citizen Health Promotion Program Grant Proj Ord
Attachment 2 Senior Citizen Health Promotion Program Grant Project Ordinance Project Number 11 -671 �✓� _ l Be it ordained by the Orange County Board of County Commissioners that pursuant to Section 13.2 of Chapter 159 of the General Statutes of North Carolina, the following grant project is hereby adopted. Section 1. This project authorized is the Senior Citizen Health Promotion Program to develop a comprehensive and coordinated County health promotion and disease prevention program for citizens involving a partnership of public agencies, University Health Affairs and private groups. Section 2.The officers of the County are hereby directed to proceed with the grant project in accordance with the mutual - cooperation agreement between the County and the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, as approved by the Board of County Commissioners on June 30, 1997. Section 3.The following revenue is anticipated to be available to complete this project Grant Funds (1994 -95) Grant Funds (1995 -96) Grant Funds (1996 -97) Grant Funds (1997 -98) Fees for Service (1997 -98) Grant Funds (1998 -99) Fees for Service (1998 -99) Grant Funds (1999 -00) Fees for Service (2000 -01) Grant Funds (2000 -01) Grant Funds (2001 -02) Grant Funds (2002 -03) Total Revenue Section 4. The following amount is appropriated for this project: Human Services - Senior Citizen Health Promotion $32,539 $37,498 $33,779 $52,434 $14,835 $57,645 $12,000 $69,250 $24,000 $49,668 $80,364 $142,588 $606,600 $606,600 Section 5.The finance officer is hereby directed to maintain within the Grant Project sufficient specific detailed accounting records to provide the accounting to the grantor agency. Section 6.Funds may be advanced from the General Fund for the purpose of making payments due. Reimbursement requests should be made to the grantor agency in an orderly and timely manner. Attachment 2 6 Section 7.C6pies of this grant project ordinance shall be made available to the finance officer for direction in carrying out this project. Section 8. Positions authorized through this grant project ordinance include: 1.OFull Time Equivalent Senior Health Public Educator This position is authorized through June 30, 2003. Subsequent funding in future years is contingent upon the availability of grant funds. Section 9.This ordinance supersedes all previous "Senior Citizen Health Promotion" Grant Project Ordinances. Section 10. This project, originally adopted May 2, 1994 and subsequently amended, is in effect through June 30, 2003. Adopted this 17th day of February 2003. OR.7 -- a210.3 ©v a h. Budget Amendment #8 aZ- / 7''0,61ea The Board approved the budget ordinance and grant project ordinance amendments for the Department of Social Services, Department on Aging, Emergency Management, Human Rights and Relations, and Dispute Settlement Center, for the 2002 -2003 fiscal year. i. School Adequate Public Facilities — Memorandum of Understanding Addendum This item was removed and placed at the end of the consent agenda for separate consideration. L 2002 -2003 Small Business and Technology Development Center (SBTDC) Contract The Board approved a contract in the amount of $10,000 with the Small Business and Technology and Development Center to continue support of small business development services as stated in the Economic Development strategic plan and authorized the Manager and the Clerk to the Board to execute the contract. k. Participation in the National Smallpox Immunization Plan and Protection for Participating Employees This item was removed and placed at the end of the consent agenda for separate consideration. VOTE ON CONSENT AGENDA: UNANIMOUS ITEMS REMOVED FROM CONSENT AGENDA i. School Adequate Public Facilities — Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) Addendum The Board considered approval of an amendment to the Schools Adequate Public Facilities (SAPF) MOU adopted on December 20, 2002 for the Town of Carrboro. The Town of Chapel Hill requested that the same addendum be adopted for Chapel Hill. Commissioner Jacobs said that we received a letter from Carrboro with some concerns about the SAPFO and he asked that this be included in the discussion on the 26th. The concerns were about high school capacity and the letter asked if the Board of County Commissioners would follow the model used with the middle school level in the Orange County system and suspend consideration of the capacity, consider merger, or find other ways to build capacity. Planning Director Craig Benedict said that he attended the February 18th Carrboro work session and Carrboro had issues and questions. The outcome of the work session is the letter and the County staff will be meeting with Carrboro's staff about some technical implementation questions. In the short term we need to address where Carrboro is with this ordinance in order to move forward. Commissioner Gordon said that Roy Williford, the Carrboro Planning Director, was at the recent Schools and Land Use Council (SLUC) meeting, and he explained Carrboro's concerns. She said that she is not sure how the County Manager's office is going to address this because there is no money budgeted for the middle school in 2007 -2008 in the capital improvement program. John Link said that he received a call today from a reporter and he did make a response. He said that we should put this response in writing for both Chapel Hill and Carrboro. The capital improvement plan identifies the major projects in outlying years. He said that 2007 -2008 is beyond the short term financing plan we have for addressing any capital item. It does not mean that the CIP is not totally legitimate and that the planning process is not solid. He also told the reporter that since 1988 this Board of Commissioners and the citizens of Orange County have approved three bond issues, and using pay -as- you -go and State funding, we have addressed over $225,000,000 in school construction. He said that this demonstrates the ability of Orange County and the commitment of Orange County to fund those identified needs — school or County related. The citizens should be confident that Orange County would address the needs of the future. Chair Brown said that she went to the Chapel Hill meeting when the SAPFO was adopted and they had no such questions. She hopes that the questions from Carrboro do not delay the implementation of the SAPFO. Craig Benedict said that as soon as Carrboro's staff is satisfied with the questions then the mayor wants it back on the agenda. The SAPFO can be implemented as late as April with no problem.