Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda - 06-09-2011 - 3ORANGE COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS ACTION AGENDA ITEM ABSTRACT Meeting Date: June 9, 2011 Action Agenda Item No. 3 SUBJECT: Outside Agencies: Recommended Allocations FY2011-12 DEPARTMENT: PUBLIC HEARING: (Y/N) No County Manager's Office Financial Services ATTACHMENT(S): 1. BOCC Adopted Policy Guidelines 2. Application Evaluation Teams INFORMATION CONTACT: Gwen Harvey, Assistant County Manager, 245-2307 Clarence Grier, Financial Services Director, 245-2453 Allison Chambers,. Budget Technician, 245-2121 PURPOSE: To provide supplemental background information to the BOCC in budget work session to support allocations recommended by County Management to Outside Agencies for FY2011-12. BACKGROUND: County Management recommendations for Outside Agency Funding begins on page 29-1 in the Proposed Operating Budget Document In December 2010 the BOCC, after extensive review in a fall work session, adopted a set of guiding principles to guide County Management in evaluating and proposing recommended funding allocations in subsequent budget years. These guidelines reflected BOCC community partnership interests along with continuing concerns for strong performance, non-duplicative efforts, collaborative pursuits, and safety net considerations. The BOCC policy guidelines are provided in Attachment 1 to this agenda abstract. To facilitate coordinated and objective review of the Outside Agency applications, application evaluation was assigned according to affiliated County Department management team and its advisory board/commission. Each used the approved Outside Agency Evaluation Scorecard to determine the raw score and provide additional narrative to support their findings and conclusions (not funding amount) to Financial Services and County Management. Team assignments are provided in Attachment 2 to this agenda abstract. A diverse team of non-management County employees was organized and reviewed applications that did not 2 naturally align with any particular County Department and entailed general community services to Orange County residents. Their findings and conclusions (not funding amount) was also shared with Financial Services and County Management. The Proposed Annual Operating Budget Document also includes the following attachment: • Historical funding by Orange County, additional financial support coordinated through individual Orange County Department operating budgets, and In-Kind Contributions provided to an Outside Agency by Orange County in lieu of direct payment • Outside Agency Revenue analysis: Various means of financial support per Agency • Outside Agency Descriptions and Recommended Allocation FY201-12 is the second fiscal year in a row in which contributions for Outside Agencies was recommended at substantially reduced amounts. Outside Agencies are informed each December at the Organizational and Orientation meeting prior to application submission of BOCC -established policies, guidelines, and perspectives, particularly an overall funding amount not to exceed the funding amount of the previous fiscal year. Outside Agencies are notified of the County Management recommended allocations as soon as the Proposed Budget document is release to the BOCC and general public. Agencies recommended for a significant variance are especially contacted to assure their knowledge and welcome their participation at one of one of the budget public hearings. Notable changesltrade-offs contained within County Management recommendations impacting relations between Outside Agencies and partner County Departments are detailed below: Senior Care of Orange County Inc. (SC of OC, Inc.): The Department on aging recommended budget contains approximately $25,000 in new funds to cover all congregate meal expenses associated with both senior centers and the adult day health center. Previously, SC of OC, Inc. contracted through the Department on Aging for senior meals and then reimbursed the Department. This method allows the Department to gain efficiencies and manage overall costs through the approved vendor. The annual Home Community Care Block Grant generally covers, with senior donations, the cost of congregate meals, but as vendor costs increase and with the end of federal stimulus dollars, closer coordination and control for senior meals will be even more important. The Social Services Department recommended budget contains approximately $22,500 in new funds to provide senior and family choice and flexibility in the "purchase" of adult day care services and related support under both the social and health models. In coordination with Aging, Social Services can better control and direct County dollars through "purchase" agreements with either SC of OC, Inc. (central/northern Orange) or the Charles House (southern Orange)., including any opportunities for family participation in cost for service. Hillsborough Youth Athletic Association (HYAA): The Social Services Department recommended budget contains approximately $10,000 in new funds to allow youth/parent/guardian to select any athletic and recreational programs within 3 Orange County for youth participation, including HYAA. Eligible youth will receive a County scholarship or subsidy accordingly. Priority will be given to youth in foster homes or with mothers in Work First. This provides choice and flexibility based upon need, without direct financial support directly any one agency or organization within the County. Orange County Congregations in Mission (OCIM) -Hillsborough: An increase of $5000 above their FY2010-11 approved allocation is recommended to provide supplemental support for home delivered meals and food pantry to frail seniors, the disabled, and families with food insecurity brought on by budgetary emergencies. OCIM has a history of being a strong collaborator and ally with Social Services in extending and supplementing relief to individuals and families in need. Inter Faith Council (IFC) -Chapel Hill: An increase of $5000 above their FY2010-11 approved allocation is recommended specifically to supplement IFC in insuring and/or increasing transitional housing at Home Start to client referrals from the Social Services Department. IFC administers Home Start, a program for women and families seeking refuge from homelessness including domestic violence and abuse. Joint Orange and Chatham County Community Action Agency (JOCCA) - Pittsboro The recommended allocation for JOCCA steps down an additional $20,000 from FY2010-11 to continue to decrease Orange County general fund support for agency administrative costs versus direct services to Orange County residents. FINANCIAL IMPACT: The BOCC appropriated over $900,000 in financial assistance to Outside Agencies in FY2010- 11.The proposed funding for FY2011-12 totals $779,000, a decrease of $123,000. The BOCC as part of its budget deliberations determines the final total amount to be provided to Outside Agencies and the specific funding by Agency. Approved Agency allocations are administered through an annual performance agreement and allotments distributed by the County on a reimbursement basis through the fiscal year. RECOMMENDATION(S): The Manager recommends the Board receive the information and background documentation provided with this agenda abstract and within the Proposed Annual Operating Budget and provide further direction, as may be desired, to assist in deciding Outside Agency contributions from the General Fund for FY2011-12. ~~~~ i 4 OUTSIDE AGENCY FUNDING: FEEDBACK AND DIRECTION ORANGE COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS DECEMBER 2010 The following elements -taken as a whole or singularly -constitute the basis for why an Outside Agency is selected for Orange County Funding. The County Manager incorporates all feedback and documentation from participating departments and advisory boards, most notably Financial Services, in preparing recommendations on Outside Agencv funding allocations as part of the operating budget presentation to the BOCC in the spring" First and foremost, benefits Orange County residents. • It is desirable that the location of service delivery be in Orange Count Funding the Outside Agencv leverages County dollars because the Agency can provide services less expensively by the use of volunteers or other means Supports the social safety net; i.e., the Outside Agency exists to feed the hungry; house the homeless; address human suffering (example: Housing. for New Hope) Leaacy/historical relationship; i.e., the County helped co-create or was among original funding group (example: Dispute Settlement Center) .Performance review/ranking; i.e., the Outside Agency scores a baseline numerical ranking or above on its Application Scorecard (example: Piedmont Health Services) Unique mission/service; i.e., the Outside Agency meets a specific need not otherwise met for County residents (example: EI Hispano) Financial need; i.e., the Outside Agency fulfills an important mission but requires government assistance to help accomplish its service goals (example: OE Enterprises Principal partnership; i.e., the Outside Agency has demonstrated its effectiveness in supplementing and/or supporting County departments in their delivery of service to vulnerable populations (examples: Orange Congregations in Mission and the Inter-Faith Council) Geographic balance; i.e., the Outside Agency helps ensure opportunity and access to key programs and services are available on both ends of the county (example: Communities in Schools/Middle School After School) 5 Matching grant; i.e., the Outside Agency specifically needs County dollars to match a unique, desired investment in services to county residents (no examples in FY10-11) Enables new initiative• i e. the Outside Agencv addresses unmet needs it perceives in the County (example: Bridge /1 Spots -not funded in FY10-77) Grounds for Funding Commitments The BOCC intent is a "zero-base" approach wherein Outside Agencies must annually prove themselves according to pre-set criteria, such as the Outside Agency Application Scorecard or other indices. While Outside Agencies may wish for a fairly consistent and predictable revenue stream, the BOCC makes annual allocation decisions on the basis of policies and provisions as set forth in this document. Limitations on Funded Amount by Agency or Total Funds Available for all Agencies Dollar Limit by Single Agency - • Percentage of its overall budget (Rule of thumb: No more than 50% of Agencv budget should come from County and Town sources) • Flat dollar amount • "Challenge" or "Match" amount • "Step down" approach -diminishing amount over a period of fiscal years • Agency has demonstrated a reliable, diverse funding stream of which governmental assistance is a small portion Dollar Limit to Amount Available for All Outside Agency Funding - BOCC sets maximum figure available for the upcoming fiscal year. • Typically, County management has begun with a working figure roughly equivalent to the amount funded in the current fiscal year for the next fiscal year. (The historic figure for working purposes is a target the BOCC may choose to match, increase, or decrease in its final budget decisions). Other Defining Criteria • Financial support that brokers a new partnership or collaboration with a County operating department, preferably supportive of the social safety net. Reduce or eliminate funding for Outside Agencies whose • Primary mission is not related to the social safety net 6 • Pertormance data is historically weak or deteriorating • Principal programs and services are duplicated within the Outside Agency network of providers Factor the net value of County facility space provided free of charge to recipient Outside Agencies • Amend Outside Agency award by net value amount ADOPTED BY THE BOCC ON DECEMBER 6, 2010 a~ z OUTSIDE AGENCY APPLICATION REVIEW FY11-12 ORANGE COUNTY DEPARTMENTS/COUNTY EMPLOYEE TEAM/OPC LME ASSIGNMENTS Social Services Board/Nancy Coston 1) Child Care Services Association 2) Dispute Settlement Center 3) Interfaith Council 4) Joint Orange-Chatham Community Action Agency (JOCCA) 5) Orange Chatham Alternative Sentencing 6) Orange Congregations in Mission 7) Hill-Carrboro YMCA/Boomerang Board of Health/Rosie Summers 1) Duke Homecare & Hospice 2) Piedmont Health Services 3) Planned Parenthood 4) Rape Crisis Center 5) Family Violence Prevention Center 6) Alliance on AIDS 7) Eyes, Ears, Nose and Paws Aging Advisory Board/Janice Tyler 1) Charles House Association 2) Disability Awareness Council 3) Triangle Radio Reading Service 4) Senior Care of Orange County, Inc. 5) Meals on Wheels Affordable Housing Advisory Board/Human Relations Commission/Tara Fikes 1) Housing for New Hope 2) Community Housing/Land Trust (Line Appropriation) 3) EmPOWERment 4) Habitat for Humanity 5) The Women's Center A_ nimal Services Advisory Board/Bob Marotto 1) Piedmont Wildlife Center 2) Triangle Wildlife Rehab Clinic Recreation and Parks Advisory Committee/Lori Taft 8~ Dave Stancil 1) Hillsborough Youth Athletic Association (HYAA) 2) Bridge to Sports 3) Triangle Land Conservancy 8 4) Historic Hillsborough Commission 5) Boys & Girls Club 6) Big Brothers Big Sisters OPC/Local Management EntitylJudy Truitt 1) The Arc of Orange County 2) Club Nova 3) KidScope . 4) Freedom House 5) Orange Enterprises, Inc. Community Benefit Agencies/Perdita Holtr, Employee Committee* 1) Communities in Schools 2) CIS -Middle School/After School 3) Historic Hillsborough Commission 4) American Red Cross (Orange County/Durham County) 5) Orange Literacy Council 6) EI Centro Hispano 7) The Hill Center 8) The Arts Center *Employee Committee Membership: 1. Perdita Holtz, Planning & Inspections, Convener 2. Sahana Ayer, County Attorney's Office 3. Cody Marshall, Solid Waste 4. David Hunt, County Clerk's Office 5. Greg Wilder, County Manager's Office 6. Doris Cecil, Emergency Services Updated 5/30/11