Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutORD-2010-083 Justice Facility - Contractor Extended Overhead Request & Approval of Budget Amendment #2o~~- ao~o- 08~ ORANGE COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS ACTION AGENDA ITEM ABSTRACT Meeting Date: September 2, 2010 Action Agenda Item No. ~- - SUBJECT: Justice Facility -General Contractor Extended Overhead Request and Approval of Budget Amendment # 2-B DEPARTMENT: Asset Management & Purchasing Services (AMPS) Financial Services PUBLIC HEARING: (Y/N) No ATTACHMENT(S): A: Project Sources and Uses Summary B: Extended Overhead Request Letter INFORMATION CONTACT: Pam Jones, AMPS, 919-245-2652 Jeff Thompson, AMPS, 919-245-2658 Michael Talbert, Financial Services, 919-245-2153 PURPOSE: To consider: 1. Approving a negotiated amount related to requested by the General Contractor; and 2. Approving the attached Budget Amendment 2 project. extended construction overhead costs B that captures all costs in one capital BACKGROUND: The Justice Facility reached substanfial completion in May 2010. As a result of a significant delay due to a major fire rating re-design in the summer and fall of 2009, the General Contractor, Bordeaux Construction, has requested additional compensation related to the costs of the extended overhead costs related to the necessary, iterative re-design. These costs exceed the costs associated with the fire assembly change order G-10 presented to the Board in December 2009. Attachment A, "Project Sources and Uses Summary" illustrates the revenue and expense categories as they relate to both Board and Manager approvals (in the case of change orders). Items darkly tinted refer to expenses encumbered and paid for through operating funds due to their unrelated nature to the capital project. These expenses included new District Attorney office refurbishment costs, interstitial space repair, concurrent programmed refurbishment within the existing Justice Facility (restroom renovations, paint & carpet replacement), and extended asbestos testing/abatement processes. FINANCIAL IMPACT: Staff has negotiated an extended overhead compensation of $40,000 (see Attachment B, "Extended Overhead Request Letter"). Board approval of this action will effectively allow the closeout of the capital project. Both the New Courthouse Project and the River Park Development Project have been considered as part of the Justice Center Facility Project. The Justice Center Facility .Project has a shortfall of $161,217 and these funds are available in both the New Courthouse Project and the River Park Development Project. To insure accurate project accounting and asset recognition for the Justice Center Project, a total of $161,217 would be transferred to the Justice Center .Project. There would be $87,440 transferred from the New Courthouse Project, $50,000 transferred from the River Park Development Project, and $23,777 appropriated from the Town of Hillsborough for the River Park Development Project. The revenue was received in 2009 but never appropriated. The approval of Budget Amendment # 2 - B will effectively allow the closeout of all three Capital Projects: Justice Center Facility, New Courthouse, and the River Park Development. All funds are currently encumbered in the County Capital Projects Fund and no additional capital is required. Budget Amendment #2 - B Justice Center Facility: Project # 10013 Revenues for this ro'ect: Through FY 2009-10 FY 2010-11 Amendment FY 2010-11 Revised Alternative Financin $10,200,000 $10,200,000 2/3rds Net Debt Bonds 190,000 $87,440 277,440 Sales Tax 1,726,112 1,726,112 .Transfer General Fund 50,000 50,000 Contrib From Hillsborou h 0 23,777 23,777 Total Pro'ect Fundin $12,116,112 $161,217 $12,277,329 Appropriated for this project: Through FY 2009-10 FY 2010-11 Amendment FY 2010-11 Revised Desi n $1,374,103 $1,374,103 Construction 9,992,009 $161,217 10,153,226 Other 750,000 750,000 Total Costs $12,116,112 $161,217 $12,277,329 River Park Development: Project # 20032 Revenues for this ro'ect: Through FY FY 2010-11 FY 2010-11 2009-10 Amendment Revised Contrib From Hillsborou h Transfer General Fund $50,000 $50,000 2 Total Project Fundin $50,000 ($50,000 e.,.,r„nri~+cr+ fnr +hic nrniart• ., ~ ~. Through FY FY 2010-11 FY 2010-11 2009-10 Amendment Revised Construction $50,000 $50,000 Total Costs $50,000 $50,000 New Courthouse: Project # 10015 RAVAni iAS fnr this r)rniect' Through FY 2009-10 FY 2010-11 Amendment FY 2010-11 Revised 2/3rds Net Debt Bonds $190,000 $87,440 $102,560 Transfer General Fund $167,961 ~ 167.,961 Total Project Fundin $357,961 $87,440 $270,521 Annrnnriatr~rl fnr this oroieCt: • -r •-r•------ --- ----- - Through FY 2009-10 FY 2010-11 Amendment FY 2010-11 Revised Desi n $30,000 $30,000 General Renovations $327,961 ($87,440) $240,521 Total Costs $357,961 ($87,440 $270,521 3 RECOMMENDATION(S): The Manager recommends that the Board: 1. Approve the $40,000 negotiated amount related to the extended construction overhead costs requested by the General Contractor; and 2. Approve the attached Budget Amendment # 2-B consolidating all costs for the Justice Center Facility into one capital project account. g 8~~~ m ~;g~ ~~ d y ~g ~ ~ tx}Qj{ mtL ~~~mS v ~`m (q ~ S a ~~~~ 0 0 o y° ~ ~~" ~~~~ ~s~ a~~is 3 ~ga~ ~*i~~ yy~ ~~~yyggg E S E~ E 8 g ~_ ~ ~~~9~90~~ ~ ~ . ~ y¢a~ p F E ~ ~ s g ~~~~~~~~~$~ ~~~ ._.. __..._._... -__,.,_AA.._ 3 S m OO.~ ~ O'S m a S m~ N ~~mt7 K~N f h y ~ y.. 4 C yyy~5 C LL m v ~ n m ~ a ,: ~ a _ $ a s s s 8 ...E Y (4 g pp 3 i = £ a g ; C I ~ x' ~ o a ~ 3 m e a 0 a n e 4 ----------~ -~ --- ~ ~ ACT /V ~ ~~~~~.~ ~ LIfC~'rT 5 C~r'~~'~ C®RL~~ ~EI~F~®T SACK ~. 111 ARCHITHCTS • BIdGfNBSRS pLANNH&S . June 14, 2010 ~ ~ Va Telefax GLENN D.CORLBY,ArA Mr. Chad Lloyd Chafrntatt Bordeaux Construction Co., {nc. ~H.ItEpPOOT,AIA,LEEDAP 100 East Britania Avenue Presldenf Durham, NC 27704 MICHARL L. NA?~YfE[iSLEY, PE ParNter Re: Orange County Justice Expansion ANoaswR.c~utic,A~,~AP P t CRZ Project # 0417 ner ar X128110 Extended Overhead Letter DAVID bL. TAYLOR, AL1, L58D AP Partner KFMEERLY n. Ems, Atly LSeP AP Dear Mr. Lloyd: - Assnciate LAUxENCSw•stnvc~,AfA On June 1, 2070, we received the attached May 28, 2010 A~°°`°te our office in which you are requesting a total of tter from L xa~~YnLr>3NSErr y e $64,922 in extended overhead costs for the time perlod Ass°ctafc from June 17, 2010 thru November 20, 2010, a perlod o ~N~rx~s'v~ some 156 calendar days. ~°eiate We have reviewed your chronological.llsting of issues along . with your work progress analysis and cost assignment as you feel you have been impacted. On the basis of your ' lefter without benefit of time sheets, daily logs, and other supporting paperwork, we feel that you have .shown sufficient cause to merit a time{y meeting with the Owner to discuss your claim further. By copy of this [etter, we are recommending to the Owner that a meeting be scheduled ro soX zs6s between Bordeaux Construction Company and the Owner ~~elx~u, Nc z~SZ~-z~~s to review the claim letter, table relevant questions, and zzx clofster Court ~ discuss ways of reaching an amicable settlement. Chapel Efi71, NC 275142212 Surely, `~ (919} 401-8586 Telephone (9I9} 493-7306 Fax yrww.corlepr edfoo tzack.com KES/kes Attachments Cc: Ken Redfobt David Taylor Pam Jones Jeff Thompson 6 ~ ® R ® ~ A lJ. X Constriction Company , Inc . a~ircf;g 4 ~c. sr+c._.. ~1 i ~ ~ '' k May 28, 2010 Ken Smith Corley, Reelfoot, Zack . 222 Cloister Ct. Chapel HiII, NC 27514 RE: Orange County Justice Expansion Mr. Smith, . Bordeaux Construction Company, Inc. is hereby issui2lg a formal request far extended overhead cost for Orange County Building Inspections imposed code improvement revisions, the schedule impact of asbestos abatement revision and delays as associated with extended. overhead cost, per revisions xequested,by Orange County Building Insp~ctisns ~3e~axtment fo~'~ne abnvb referenced.proj~~~c3r,your review and_a~provaL Reques>r~2• ex~l~ded. oger~ead cost is baupali i3ela~s mid ;i2ie~c2eucies as outlined intimelinebelo~v: - . • • , _. • • 1. June 11~ ; 2009: Bordeaux Constriction directed to stop ALL work associated with Field Memo #56 by CorleyRedfoot Zack based on ongoing concerns with Orange County Building Inspections; BCC proceeding with base bid. scope of work. ~ " 2. "July 1~ ; 2009: BCC de-mobilization from pmject as no further work can be done at this time with regards to base bid renovation completion or proposed change orders pendiing approval. ' ~. July It}tn 2009:.C12Z distribl2tes pdfdrawil~gs as they relate to associated revisions to'.IM#56 for pricing based upon'OCBI comments. 4. August 31~ ; 2009: BCC returns to site to proceed with work associated with Owner Change Order #I2 t"Restroom Retloyations). BCC demo of 1~ and 2"a floor gang bathroom, no other trades on site at this time. • 5. September 9a', 20009: BCC presents proposal to CRZ and OC for adclitional cost associated with revisions to Field Memo # 56. At this time OC felt cost were prohibitive aniirequested BCC to.pul'sue solicitation o;~bids to spri2lkler buildilig. - - - . ,. ep a ~7' , agrees o review p~rovlslolls pmvl a sp eel ...._ v-~"`~ ".~""'° . . ~ buildiing (existing court]~ouse~ system.. BCC to.pxepare pricing; 7 ~ ~ ~ ~Septelnber.24~', 20D9: BCC,provides pricing to CRZ ~`rom-A$L ~S~irinlcleir to • provide:fully.sprinkledbuildzng.~ystemfor•owner appxovaL _ •~ ' " PO Box 2935, Durham, NC 27715-2935 I00 E. Britania Aye., Durham, NC 27704 (9I9) 220-I I41 tel (919) 220-1247 fax . wstnvbordeauxconsh•ucdonco.com ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ A U X Conslruct[on Company, Inc. 8. September 280; 2009: OC cannot move_forward with sprinkler approval at this time as ap~roval~ from board is required . 9. October S , 2009: BCC provides proposal to CRZ for cost of sprinkler shop drawing only. To date NO approval has been given with regards to any items associated with Field Memo #S6. IO.October 140; 2009: CRZ notifies BCC that OCBI has reviewed and approved associated drawing revisions {FM#S6 Code Improvements); BCC to prepare revised priding. 11.October 160i, 2009: CRZ upon approval of OC releases BCC to begin preparations of sprinkler shop drawings. 12.October 30~ ; 2009: BCC provides FM#56 "Code Revisions" revised pricing to CRZ for owner appxval . . 13. Novembe>a2"~, 2009: BCC, CRZ and OC meet to discuss change proposal. At this time OC feels as cost are still prohibitive and request BCC to revise pricing again and remove items chat will be performed by the owner. Also addressed at this meeting; Tom Bordeaux (BCC) and Jeff Thompson (OC) discussed the additional lost ineuned by BCC during this process of code revision pricing and Mr. Thompsoni ac~owledged that Bordeaux had incurred additionai cost but requested that BCC separate the extended cost from this CP ; Mr. Bordeaux agreed to do us and both parties agreed to access this'cost upon completion of the contract. 14. November Sa; 2009: BCC provide additional revisions requested by OC for approval {CF#S7R2). 15. November 140; 2009: BCC stops drywall subcontractor from concealing all walls and ceilings as No• further work can be done (BB or CO} at this time pending owner approval on code revisions. 16. November 1601, 2009: CRZ notifies BCC that code improvements in the existing building cannot be approved by theowner at th}s ~timeg.owner will have to go before BOC for approval 17. November 1801, 2009: BCC given stop work notice on code revisions by OC and requested to revise CP#S7R to reflect additional cost as stated in CRZ letter "11/18/Q9 Change Order G-13 Status": 18. November 200', 2009: BCC demobilizes from project for a second time. 19. November 300; 2009: BCC provides CRZ with CP#S7R3 for approval and execution. 20. December 4a ; 2009: BCC receives cover letter for CP-I3 for signature. --~- ~~- - ~--..,-.~---~-.,---..,.-...~._.. _~~. 0,..ti .,r .. ~._-.--,,.-..,,.-.,.._,.-..-~_....~-.~ -,...,..,.~ 21. Dece"-'giber 2~$ , 2~3: ~CZ; receives ndtsce o~ egec e CP=13 y owner {SCC-~- ~~~--~ . ~ signed 12/7/CRZ signed 12/10 & OC signed 12/18) ' 22. J:anllary 4~', 2010: BCC and associated subcontractors remobilize to site to complete associated. code revision CO and building completion. Pd Box 2935, Durham, NC 277!5-2935 I00 E. Brita~ria Ave., IIurfiam, NC 27704 ~„ (919) 220-1141 teI (9I9) 22D-1147 tax wu~tvbordeauxcanstrncdonrncom 8 • •&o'tYSte+u•etion•• Company, lne. ~ + 23. January 4a', 2010-April 28~': CodQ Revision w.d associated finish work ongoing until date of substantial. completion Apri128a', 2010. • Associated Cost per above time line: • _ n June'' 17~; 20U~ August 316 ; 2Q09: On Jung 11~', BCC zeeeived stop work directive •ozi~ all work associated with FM#56, at this'time BCC was . working on oxg. contract work to the extent possible. Work was limited. to ..+ • ~ - selective demolition in areas throughout the building only. •Sub-contractor work was•halted at this poilrt until resolution. could be made to move forward with code revisions. On July 1~, X009 BCC'demobilized•fromtha pxojeCt site. .. . . General~Conditions (a3 $324.00/day (x} 61 days = $19,724.00 . • Supervision & Ilxsuranees @ $446.001day (x) 61 days= *$CC allocated supervision and labor forces during this period on various . othergroject sites throughout the company as to not layoff any of our staff sllocatecl for this project **Upon acceptmrsce of this proposal BCC wi11 not seek any fiirther labor or supervision cost incuxxed for this time period. • Sub-Total during this period: $19,724.OA _ I~ August 31~; 2009 November 20~; 2009: During this period Bce maintained an ansite presence of one superintendent and 2 laborers, working on CP-12, site wall~way revisions and misc interior up fits associate with~OCBI code ilr~pxovements; subeoxctractorworkwus minimal to non-extent during Ibis geriod oftime as BCC was working under premise tjlat ongoing code review pricitlg would.,be.approved. Cost is r0ftective-of BCC workilig at M4~45Y effieieflcy, • • General Conditions @ $324.OOtday (~c} 81 days =$26,244.00 « Supervision &-Insurances @ $446.00/day (x) 81 days = $36,126.00 . . • dub-Total during this period: $62,370.00 (-)BCC ongoing work @ 45% efficiency = $28,Q67.00 • Total forthisperiod =$34,303.00 . II~ November 20a; 2009-December 28a', 2009: OnNavember 18~", Z009, BCC . -received letter from CRZ {Change Order G 13 Status) stating the intezit.bf the owner to execute Change Order G-13 and tfLat said change order wot~Id be executed no later than December 1.5, 2009 by OCBC. In this letter the • owner also "request that you stop work on the project on any items which . will negatively affect or impact the future work of the code ' PO Box 2935, Durham, NC 27715-2435 IDO E. Brltania Ave., Du'rflant, NC 27704 (919) 220-1141 tel {919) 220-1147 fax ' tnvt~v.6ordeaua~consCructionrn.mm r 9 ' Con;traction Company, lnc: - improvements". At this stage BCC determined that'no work org. contract • or other change orders could proceed without negatlvely affecting the • • associated word described in the letter and de-mobilized. from the project life onlVov: 20~; 20Q9. • • *$ot<desux Construction ima?r aura by no fault of out own,•tbat'wewere i'oxced fromthe projectsite as no work•dpuld contu~ue'without . __ : ,~• negatively effec'tiilg the •code itllpraveineiltitoms set forth in CP~13. , ~, ~ *~'Ipon rcceeptance of Phis proposal Bordeaux Construction will not . ' .seek exfendecl the, extended'overhead aild cost incurred during this time • peiiod. ~ . ' ~ BCC Project Management & F,stimating Time. (C~dei gevisio~Pricang} . Project Manger/Estimator (1 Nfonth) $9;072,00 • . -. . S~uperintendeirt (Room by Room Itemized Code Improvement sunnmation fo>>` pricing of org. FM##5~ (1 Week) • $1,823.00 • Sub-Total of item N: $.IO, 895.00 V) Summation of Ifems I N: ~~ • ' Schedule Impact Total: $64,922.00 Note: .. • . ~ , • • i.) All pricing is based on original base bid general condition &'supervisions pacing. It•s~lould be noted that this pricing is,over 3 years old. . 2.) (leneral Conditions, Supervision and rilsurances are based on Overhead - .. • .operating cost~set.fozfih in, fhe approved saheiiuie of vahle~ for Ibis project. Upon receipt of tbis:proposal we formally request your response witilin.ten business days. Please know,tli,~t we are available to discuss: ~Yus ml~tter in persblr at pour earliest ' eanvenien,ce. If you. have any questions, do riot hesitate to can~ct us,. • :• - .. Sincerely, • .. ... ~ - . . Bordea Cari coon Campauy; Inc. , - ' Chad'Lloy ~ ., . • . •• Project Manager •. .' .. ~ • PO Box 2935,17urham, A1C 27715-2935 I00 B. Britavia Ave., Duihazn, NC 27704 (919} 220-1141 te! (919) 220-1147 fax ivivtixbordeauxrnnstructionco.mm - 10 _' '~ ® 1~ ® ~ A ~U X ~^1r Constru ctfon Company, Ine ~ ' CC: • • - Project File - - Tom Bordefiux' . Ken R.edfoox • - • • - ' .. . David Tay1o.~ ~ , ' - JeffT#IOmpson Pam Jones PO Boy 2935, Durham, NC 277IS-2935 100 B. Britaiua Ave;, Durham, NC 27704 {9I9) 220-114I te! (919) 220-1147 Eaa - navx:bordeacn:canslruciioam.cam 4 The Board approved on second reading the granting of a franchise for afive-year term to AAA Transport, Inc. Basic Life Support Convalescent Transport Services and Emergency Services; authorized the Chair to sign the Franchise Ordinance; directed staff to discuss and enter into an Operations Agreement with AAA within 90 days that identifies the subcategories under which AAA will be permitted to operate the Convalescent and Emergency Medical Basic Life Support Franchise based on the needs of the County and the capacity and capabilities of AAA as well as to provide for the daily operational functions of AAA as it works within the Orange County Emergency Services System; and after the Emergency Services Director negotiates the Operations Agreement with AAA, authorized the County Manager to sign the Agreement subject to review by the County Attorney or his staff. The granting of the Franchise Ordinance is conditional upon successful completion of the Operations Agreement with 90 days of acceptance of the Franchise Ordinance by AAA Medical Transport. m. Second Reading: Implementation of a One-Week Payroll Deferral - Amendment to Orange County Personnel Ordinance Article III Section 1 0 The Work Week and Resolution Authorizing the Use and Advancement of Sick Personal and Petty Leave During Pavroll Deferral The Board approved on second reading the amendment to Article III, section 1.0 of the Orange County Personnel Ordinance and approved the resolution authorizing use and advancement of up to forty hours of sick leave and personal and petty leave accrued through June 30, 2011 for the sole purpose of supplementing employee pay for the period ending October 8, 2010 during implementation of the payroll deferral. n. Second Reading: Amendment to the Orange Countv Personnel Ordinance Article VI. Sections 5.1 and 5.2 of the Position Classification Plan The Board approved on second reading an amendment to Article VI, Sections 5.1 and 5.2 of the Position Classification Plan. o. Second Reading: Amendment to the Orange County Personnel Ordinance Article II. Recruitment and Employment to Add Section 5 7 Appointments of Incumbents and Others to Vacant Positions The Board approved on second reading an amendment to Article II, Sections 5.0 Appointments and 5.7 Appointments of Incumbents and Other to Vacant Position, with staff providing the Board with the administrative rules and procedures guiding the implementation of this amendment at an upcoming meeting. ~ Animal Services Facility -Third Amendment to Agreement for Construction Manager at Risk and Approval of Budget Amendment # 2-A This item was removed and placed at the end of the consent agenda for separate consideration. g, Justice Facility - General Contractor Extended Overhead Reauest and Approval of Budget Amendment # 2-B The Board approved the $40,000 negotiated amount related to the extended construction overhead costs requested by the General Contractor; and approved the attached Budget Amendment #2-B consolidating all costs for the Justice Center Facility into one capital project account. The total of all costs for this project is $12,277,329. r. Change in BOCC Regular Meeting Schedule for 2010 The Board amended its regular meeting calendar for 2010 by: - Adding a location for the Orange County Assembly of Governments Meeting, which is scheduled for Thursday, September 16, 2010 at 7:00 p.m. and will be held at the Southern Human Services Center. 2501 Homestead Road in Chapel Hill O~IJ-~~/0- 0~3 '~ VOTE ON CONSENT AGENDA: UNANIMOUS