HomeMy WebLinkAboutGrant - Planning - 1998 Historic Preservation Fund Grant Application 01-20-1998-9c1
ORANGE COUNTY
BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
ACTION AGENDA ITEM ABSTRACT
Meeting Date: January 20 1998
Agenda Abstract
Item # ~- (~
SUBJECT: 1998 HISTORIC PRESERVATION FUND GRANT APPLICATION
DEPARTMENT: Planning PUBLIC HEARING: Yes X No
BUDGET AMENDMENT REQUIRED: Yes X No
ATTACHII~IENTS: INFORMATION CONTACT:
Donald R. Belk
(1) 1998 Historic Preservation Fund Grant Application: Preservation Planner/ X2594
St. Mary's Road/Trading Path Historic Corridor National
Register Nomination PHONE NUMBERS:
(2) Application Packet from State Historic Preservation Office Hillsborough 732-8181
(3) National Register Fact Sheets Mebane 227-2031
(4) Draft Notification Flyer for St. Mary's Road Property Owners Durham 688-7331 _
Chapel Hill 967-9251
PURPOSE: To consider a 1998 Historic Preservation Fund grant application for recommendation and
submission to the State Historic Preservation Office.
BACKGROUND: The State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) has announced the application period for
1998 federal Historic Preservation Fund grants. Eligible projects include azchitectural and
azcheological surveys, prepazation of nominations to the National Register of Historic
Places, and preservation plans.
This yeaz, an estimated $70,000-$130,000 (depending upon Congressional action) may be
available for preservation grants to local communities or nonprofit organizations. In
accordance with federal requirements, $65-70,000 is reserved for grants to communities,
such as Orange County, that participate in the Certified Local Government (CLG)
program. Grant awazds, representing up to 60% of estimated project costs, aze generally
in the $5-15,000 range.
Grant applications must be completed and submitted to the SHPO by January 31, 1998.
Grant awards will be announced in Mazch 1998 and projects must be completed by July
31, 1999.
The attached 1998 Historic Preservation Fund grant application requests funding to
complete a nomination of the St. Mary's Road/Trading Path Historic Corridor to the
National Register of Historic Places. During the development of Orange County's
Preservation Plan, interviews were conducted with members of the Historic
Preservation Commission and the local preservation community to elicit their views on
preservation priorities for the county. In addition, a series of public meetings was held
to seek information and opinions from citizens about places in the County they
considered historically significant and worthy of preservation. The St. Mary's Road
corridor was consistently cited as an important resource because of its historic
association with the Trading Path and its scenic qualities as a gateway to Orange
2
County. Citizens also acknowledged that suburban sprawl threatens the cultural and
historical significance of the azea. The Historic Preservation Commission advocates
measures to protect the integrity of St. Mary's Road as a preservation resource.
Durham County is also interested in the St. Mary's Road/Trading Path. The Durham
County Historic Preservation Commission has approved the concept of a St. Mary's
Road/Indian Path Historic Corridor. They are currently updating their historic
resources inventory and will include their portion of St. Mary's Road in the
reassessment. The Hazdscrabble Plantation (circa 1775), located on the Durham
County side of St. Mary's Road, is a (Durham) County Historic Landmazk.
According to Orange County's historical architecture survey, fifteen historic inventory
sites aze located along the road, including three National Register sites and three
National Register-eligible sites. The Historic Preservation Commission believes the St.
Mary's Road/Trading Path Corridor contains suitable contributing characteristics to
qualify as a rural historic district. The corridor exhibits elements of a historic cultural
landscape that has evolved through use by the people whose activities and occupancy
have modified the physical environment. The corridor possesses a significant
concentration, linkage, and continuity of land uses, buildings and structures, roads, and
natural features that would qualify it as a National Register Rural Historic District.
Grant funds would be used to develop a National Register nomination for the St_
Mary's Road/Trading Path Historic Corridor. Funds would be used to hire a consultant
to conduct survey work aimed at developing a thorough historic context of the rural
landscape of the corridor. The scope of work would include: determination of historic
area boundaries and evaluation of the landscape elements; expanded surveys on historic
structures and azcheological sites; evaluation of significance and historic integrity of the
landscape and built environment; application of the National Register criteria, and
preparation of the National Register Multiple Listing forms. The work would also include
the required photography for the nomination forms and preparation of a color slide
presentation.
Listing in the National Register of Historic Places is an honorary designation which
recognizes the importance of a site to the Nation's heritage. National Register designation
imposes no restrictions on property owners; however, it does offer a degree of protection
by ensuring a review of federally-funded projects to determine if they pose adverse
impacts to National Register sites. This requirement is described in Section 106 of the
National Historic Preservation Act. Similazly, North Cazolina law (General Statutes Sec.
121-12a) provides for consideration of National Register sites in state-funded or state-
licensed projects. (The attached National Register Fact Sheets provide additional
information on the National Register.)
RECOIVII~NDATION: The Administration recommends that the County Manager be authorized to apply for up to
$18,000 from the Historic Preservation Fund Grant Program. If the grant proposal is
accepted by the State Historic Preservation Office, the Planning Department will request
$8,000 in the FY1998-99 Budget as a cash match. The grant and matching funds would
be used to complete a National Register nomination for the St. Mary's RoadlTrading Path
Historic Corridor.
3
1998 HISTORIC PRESERVATION FUND (HPF) APPLICATION FORM
State Historic Preservation Office
North Cazolina Division of Archives and History
I. PROJECT INFORMATION (Please type or print with black ink)
Title: St. Mary's Road/Trading Path Historic Corridor
Project Type:
Archaeological Investigation
Architectural Survey
Survey Manuscript
X National Register (NR) Nominations
ArchitecturaUEngineering Studies
Restoration/Rehabilitation (NR Property)
Other (Specify)
II. APPLICANT INFORMATION
Contact Person: Donald R. Belk Title: Preservation Planner -
Address: 306F Revere Road
Telephone:
fax: (919) 644-3002 a-mail: dbelk(a,co.oranee.nc.us
Applicant Organization or Agency: Orange County
Applicant Organization or Agency federal ID #:
Certified Local Government (if applicable): Certification effective April 13, 1993
Local Matching Funds: (non-federal) Attach list if necessary
Donor: Orange County
Source: General Fund
Date Available: July 1, 1998 Kind (cash/other) Cash/In-Kind Amount: $8,000/$4,000
Local Project Coordinator: Same as Contact Person (abovel
Address:
fax:
Telephone:
e-mail:
John Link, County Manager January 20, 1998
SIGNATURE AND TITLE: Officer of Applicant Organization DATE
(2)
III. ABSTRACT OF PROPOSED PROJECT (SEE ATTACHED ABSTRACT.)
On a separate sheet, please describe in one well developed pazagraph what will be accomplished with
the grant and matching funds, and how the project meets the goals of Legacy, North Cazolina's
comprehensive historic preservation plan for the 1990s (see enclosed information).
Applications for azchitectural surveys should include the estimated number of acres and properties to
be surveyed. Archaeological survey project abstracts must be accompanied by a map (LJSGS Quad)
showing the azea(s) to be covered and a narrative statement/estimate of the acreage to be covered.
Historic Preservation Office staff aze available for assistance in developing the project description,
including an estimated budget (see contact information).
Please limit the abstract to three double spaced typewritten pages.
IV. BUDGET: AN ESTIMATE OF PROJECT COSTS
Below is an itemized budget for work to be accomplished with both grant and matching funds
during the estimated project period of 12 months beginning 7-1-98 and ending 7-1-99
(Matching funds must constitute at least 40% of actual costs).
Budget Items:
Principal Consultant*
Project Coordinator
Fihn/Developing
Mapping/GIS Coordination
"Consultant's fee is all-inclusive of professional fee, travel, and per diem.
Estimated Cost:
$ 25.000
2.000
1,000
2,000
TOTAL PROJECT COST $ 30,000
GRANT REQUEST $ 18,000 MATCHING FUNDS $ 12,000
Budget Notes:
(1) Cash funds must be available for payment of direct costs, such as salaries or contractor fees,
travel, film and developing. Be sure that grant funds are matched with sufficient nonfederal cash
match to meet this requirement.
(2) In-kind contributions may include office costs, use of equipment, donated labor or material,
indirect costs (universities only), and project coordination, provided they are essential to the project
and property documented.
(3) Matching funds must constitute at least 40% of actual costs.
4,
Send original and two copies (with Equal Opportunity Statement) by 1/31/98 to:
Grants Administrator, State Historic Preservation Office, N.C. Division of Archives and History,
109 E. Jones Street, Raleigh, NC 27601-2807. (See special deadlines for projects in CLG areas).
5
1998 HISTORIC PRESERVATION FUND (HPF) APPLICATION FORM
State Historic Preservation Office
North Carolina Division of Archives and History
III. ABSTRACT OF PROPOSED PROJECT
When white settlers began arriving in the North Carolina Piedmont during the eazly-to-
mid eighteenth century, many of them traveled south along a trade route used for centuries by
native inhabitants. The Indian Trading Path extended from present-day Petersburg, Virginia, to
the North Cazolina-South Carolina border near Union County and beyond. During colonial
times, it was a major route of travel into Hillsborough and Orange County. Farmsteads and
plantations were built along the road. Farmers used the ancient path, once trod by bison, to drive
hogs on the hoof to Petersburg. The Trading Path spawned numerous villages and became the
main corridor for a system of colonial travel and trade. Today, only remnants of the Trading
Path remain. Disrupted by settlement and land use patterns, there aze only faint reminders of a
route that was significant to the growth and development of North Cazolina.
During the development of Orange County's Preservation Plan, interviews were
conducted with members of the Historic Preservation Commission and the local preservation
community to elicit their views on preservation priorities for the county. In addition, a series of
public meetings was held to seek information and opinions from citizens about places in the
County they considered historically significant and worthy of preservation. The St. Mary's Road
corridor was consistently cited as an important resource because of its historic association with
the Trading Path and its scenic qualities as a gateway to Orange County. Citizens also
acknowledged that suburban sprawl threatens the cultural and historical significance of the area.
The Historic Preservation Commission advocates measures to protect the integrity of St. Mary's
Road as a preservation resource.
St. Mary's Road (NCSR 1002) in Orange County parallels and incorporates much of the
Trading Path route. As part of the primary trail for colonial settlers migrating into North
6
Carolina from coastal Virginia, numerous historic sites are located along St. Mary's Road.
According to Orange County's historical architecture survey, fifteen historic inventory sites are
located along the road, including three National Register sites and three National Register-
eligible sites. The Historic Preservation Commission believes the St. Mary's Road/Trading Path
Corridor contains suitable contributing chazacteristics to qualify as a rural historic district. The
corridor exhibits elements of a historic cultural landscape that has evolved through use by the
people whose activities and occupancy have modified the physical environment. The corridor
possesses a significant concentration, linkage, and continuity of land uses, buildings and
structures, roads, and natural features that would qualify it as a National Register Rural Historic
District.
Grant funds would be used to develop a National Register nomination for the St. Mary's
Road/Trading Path Historic Corridor. Funds would be used to hire a consultant to conduct survey
work aimed at developing a thorough historic context of the rural landscape of the corridor. The
scope of work would include: determination of historic area boundaries and evaluation of the
landscape elements; expanded surveys on historic structures and archeological sites; evaluation of
significance and historic integrity of the landscape and built environment; application of the
National Register criteria, and preparation of the National Register Multiple Listing forms. The
work would also include the required photography for the nomination forms and preparation of a
color slide presentation.
National Register listing would provide a basis for more extensive citizen-based planning
initiatives, wherein the residents of the St. Mary's Road/Trading Path Historic Corridor would work
toward a consensus on a vision of their community's future. One approach could involve a
community "visioning" process that uses visual preference surveys, hands-on modeling and other
techniques to develop a plan for the azea. North Cazolina Scenic Byway designation, a corridor
management plan, rural district designation and design guidelines would be among the tools for
implementing a future community-based plan.
A National Register nomination for the St. Mary's Road/Trading Path Historic Corridor
would address several objectives of the county's Historic Preservation Element; namely,
promoting nominations to the National Register, incorporating archeological sites into the
county's priority list of significant historic resources, and broadening the base of support for
historic preservation in the community.
This proposal fora 1998 CLG grant would provide a model for meeting the goals and
objectives of the Legacy plan. Orange County is already implementing its own historic
preservation plan through a number of initiatives. These include a local landmazks designation
program and a National Register nomination for the Cedaz Grove Crossroads Rural Historic
District. The County is also considering creation of a preservation division within its Planning
Department to effectively integrate historic preservation concerns into the planning process.
Therefore, the proposed project, under the auspices of the County's ongoing preservation-
program, meets all the objectives of Legacy Goal #2 (Planning). In addition, the project
immediately addresses Objective #4D. Upon listing of the St. Mary's Road/Trading Path
Historic Corridor in the National Register, Objectives #SD through #SG will be addressed
through the County's continued commitment to historic preservation.
8
STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICE
DIVISION OF ARCHIVES AND HISTORY
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CULTURAL RESOURCES
Addendum to Subgrant Applications
EQUAL OPPORTUNITY STATEMENT
THE NORTH CAROLINA HISTORIC PRESERVATION PROGRAM
RECEIVES FEDERAL FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE FOR IDENTIFICATION
AND PRESERVATION OF HISTORIC PROPERTIES. UNDER TITLE VI OF
THE CIVIL RIGHTS ACT OF 1964 AND SECTION 504 OF THE
REHABILITATION ACT OF 1973, THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF
THE INTERIOR PROHIBITS DISCRIMINATION ON THE BASIS OF RACE,
COLOR, CREED, NATIONAL ORIGIN, SEX, RELIGION, AGE OR -
HANDICAP IN ITS FEDERALLY-ASSISTED PROGRAMS. IF YOU BELIEVE
YOU HAVE BEEN DISCRIMINATED AGAINST IN ANY PROGRAM,
ACTIVITY OR FACILITY, AS DESCRIBED ABOVE, OR IF YOU DESIRE
FURTHER INFORMATION, PLEASE WRITE TO: OFFICE OF EQUAL
OPPORTUNITY, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR,
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20240.
Signed: John M. Link. Jr.
Title: Count~Manager
Date of Signing: January 20. 1998
Project: St. Marv's Road/Trading Path Historic Corridor
Note: Acknowledgement of the Equal Opportunity Statement above shall
accompany each application for federal funding. Receipt of this signed and
dated statement will fulfill this requirement.
~'`~- °,,. STATE' ~~"
g~ r` ..,.,~,'~~
P"
A
~ ~='~ s
J I l~ . ~/yQ~
•~'• puu +dV.
North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources
James B. Hunt Jr., Governor
Betty Ray McCain, Secretary October 1, 1997
MEMORANDUM
TO: Potential Grant Applicants --_~
FROM: David Brook, Administrator G~.'t/~(~-~
Historic Preservation Office
RE: 1998 Historic Preservation Fund Grants
9
Division of Archives and History
Jeffrey J. Crow, Director
This memorandum is to announce the application period for 1998 federal Historic Preservation
Fund (HPF) grants. An estimated $70-130,000 (depending on Congressional action) may be
available in matching funds for preservation grants to local communities or nonprofit '
organizations. In accordance with federal requirements, $65-70,000 of the state's allocation
must be reserved for grants to communities that participate in the Certified Local Government
(CLG) program (see enclosed map).
I enclose a 1998 Grant Application packet. The narrative information and application form can
be used by both CLG and non-CLG applicants and for all types of projects. A competitive
process is used to select all recipients. Grants are awarded on a 60/40 matching basis, and
range from $5,000 to $15,000. All projects must be completed by July 31, 1999.
Eligible projects include architectural and archaeological surveys, preparation of nominations
to the National Register of Historic Places, local government preservation plans, and the
preservation of properties listed in the National Register. Educational programs, research, and
publications are usually not funded. Grants for restoration or rehabilitation of historic
properties are extremely limited.
If you have any questions please feel free to contact Lloyd Childers, grants administrator, at
(919) 733-4763.
Enclosures
DB:I0:98annouai
North Carolina's historic preservation program receives federal ftnaacial assistance for identification-and
`preservation of historic properties. UnderTitle VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and Section 504 of the
Rehabilitation Act of 1973, the U;S.: Department of the Interior prohibits discrimination oa the basis of race,. _ _
__ .
color, creed,'tuttiooal origin, sea, religion, age, or handicap is its federally-assisted programs. If you lielieve-
you have been discriminated against is any program, activity, or facility, as described above, or if you desire
further information, please write, to: Office for Equal Opportunity, U.S. Department of the Interior,
.Washington, DC 20240..
109 East Jones Street • Raleigh, North Carolina 27601-2807 g~~
10
Certified Local Governments and Staff Contacts
North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office
September 1997
CoZCnry CLGs
Municipal CLGs
Alamance County: Steve Hundley
910/228-1312x261; Fax: 910/570-6788
City of Asheville/Buncombe County:
Maggie O'Connor
704/259-5836; Fax: 704/259-5428
Town of Beaufort: Wendy Daw
919/723-2141; Fax: 919/728-3982
City of Burlington: Wes Armstrong
910/222-5103; Fax: 910/222-5019
Town of Chapel Hill: Beverly Kawalec
919/968-2728; Fax: 919/969-2014
City of Charlotte/Mecklenburg County:
John Rogers
704/336-5994; Fax: 704/336-5123
City of DurhamlDurham County:
Steve Cruse
919/560-4137x236; Fax: 919/560-4641
City of Elizabeth City:
Catmalite Boehne-Hooper
919/338-3981x251; Fax: 919/331-1291
Forsyth CountyNillage of Clemmons/
Town of Kemersville/City of Winston-
Salem: LeAnn Pegram
910/727-2087; Fax: 910/748-3163
Gaston County: Barbara Brose
7041922-7681; Fax: 704/922-7683
City of Greensboro: Mike Cowhig
910/373-2755; Fax: 9101412-6315
City of Greenville: Elizabeth Dowd
9191830-4486; Fax: 919/830-4483
City of Hickory: Tricia Reynolds
704/323-7422; Fax: 704/323-7550
City of High Point: Leslie Wagle
910/883-3545; Fax: 910/883-3056
Town of Hillsborough: Margaret Hauth
919!732-2(04; Fax: 919/644-2390
City of Kinston: Robert E. Clark
9(9/939-3253; Fax: 919/939.3127
Lincolnton/Lincoln County:
Darrell Harkey
704/736-8440; Fax: 704/732-9010
City of Monroe: Carol A. Rhea
704282-4525; Fax: 704/282-4735
Orange County: Don Belk
919/732-8181,ext/2594;
Fax: 419/644-3002
City of Raleigh: Dan Becker
9191890-3678; Fax: 919/890-3690
City of Rockingham: James Armstrong
9101895-9088; Fax: 910/997-6617
City of Salisbury: Heidi Galanti
704ib38-5230; Fax: 704/638-8437
City of Sanford: Ed A. Salem
919!775-3242; Fax: 775/8207
City of Statesville: Robert Johnson
704/878-3578; Fax: 704/878-3464
Transylvania County: Mark BtuTOws
704/884-3205; Fax: 704/884-3275
Wake County: Robin Quinn
919/856-6327; Fax: 919/856-6184
City of Washington: Susan Holladay
919/975-9384; Fax: 919/946-1965
City of Morganton: Kimberly N. Woolard City of Wilmington: Arcelia Wicker
704/438-5263; Faz: 704/432-2670 910/341-4626; Fax: 910/34(-7801
City of New Bern: Greg Sekula City of Wilson: Lu-Ann Monson
919/636-4077; Fax: 919/636-2146 919/399-2217; Fax: 919/399-2233
INSTRUCTIONS FOR
1998 PIISTORIC PRESERVATION FUND GRANT APPLICATION
State Historic Preservation Office
Division of Archives and History
North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources
Deadline for Submission: January 31, 1998
(note special deadline for projects in CLG areas)
INTRODUCTION
Please use the attached application form for proposed projects funded by the 1998 Historic
Preservation Fund (HPF), a federal matching grant program made available to the State
Historic Preservation Office (HPO) through the United States Department of the Interior's
National Park Service. All projects must address one or more goals included in Legacy, North
Carolina's comprehensive historic preservation plan (see enclosed list of Goals and
Objectives).
11
Grant funding for 1998 is estimated to range between $70, 000 and $130, 000, depending on
Congressional action. In accordance with federal requirements, $65-70,000 of the state's
allocation will be reserved for grants in communities that participate in the Certified Local
Government (CLG) program (see enclosed map and list of contacts).
New projects may include survey and planning activities or predevelopment and development
projects. Priority will be given to projects involving completion of the statewide
architectural and archaeological surveys.
After review by the HPO, your proposed project(s) may be included in the 1998 Application
for Federal Assistance to the National Park Service, U.S. Department of the Interior. If
federal assistance becomes available, you may be asked to submit additional information.
NOTE: SPECIAL DEADLINES FOR PROJECTS IN CLG AREAS.
Preservation organizations sponsoring projects that are located within a CLG jurisdiction must
be reviewed and submitted to the HPO by the authorized CLG (or its designated CLG
commission). These applications should be delivered to the appropriate CLG sta„~`', not the
HPO, by December 15, 1997. The CLG will evaluate all applications and send them to the
HPO with their comments by the January 31, 1998 deadline.
ificatioR and
color, creed; national origin, sex; religion, age, orhandicap in,its federally-assisted programs. If you believt
you have been discriminated against in arty program; activiry, or facility, ar described abovE, or if you desire
further information; please write to: Office for Equal Opportunity, U. S Department of the lnterlor,
Washington, DC 20240.
2
STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES
All projects must address one or more of the goals included in Legacy, North CaroIina's
comprehensive historic preservation plan. Reference to specific goals objectives and a
statement of how the project will accomplish them (see enclosed information) should be
included in the Abstract of the Proposed Project (Part III of Application Form).
Activities funded under this program will be performed in compliance with the applicable
Secretary of the Interior's "Standards and Guidelines for Archeology and Historic
Preservation," and shall be conducted under the supervision of the Historic Preservation
Office.
Professional qualifications of the staff, consultants, or principal investigators undertaking the
grant project(s) must meet the applicable minimal professional qualifications in 36 CFR 61,
Appendix A.
All federal grant applications include an Equal Opportunity Statement form which must be
completed and returned with the application. Applications without this form will not be
considered for funding.
SELECTION CRITERIA
All proposals will be reviewed and evaluated on the basis of the
following:
* emphasis in areas of known development activity
* benefit to minority and/or disabled populations
* contribution to statewide architectural or archaeological inventory of historic resources
* quality of resources in project area
* soundness of project application
* impact on local community
For more information contact Lloyd Childers, grants administrator, Historic Preservation
Office, 109 East Jones Street, Raleigh, NC 27601-2807. Telephone: (919) 733-4763
ELIGIBLE APPLICANTS AND ACTIVITIES
Eligible applicants include: Local governments; universities; private nonprofit organizations;
Certified Local Governments (CLGs) or potential CLGs which will be certified by March,
1998. Information on the status of CLG certification may be obtained from Lloyd Childers,
grants administrator/CLG coordinator, administration, at (919) 733-4763.
Eligible activities: Survey and Planning. Priority consideration for funding will be given to
projects for comprehensive architectural or archaeological surveys and nominations to the
National Register of Historic Places. Preservation planning activities; development of
educational materials, and preparation of publishable manuscripts from approved architectural
surveys are also eligible for consideration. Publication of surveys, museum exhibits, research,
and educational programs usually are not funded.
12
3
Predevelopment projects may include: archaeological investigations, architectural plans and
specifications, engineering services, or feasibility studies for restoration.
Development projects may include archaeological excavations or restoration/rehabilitation of
historic structures. Structures or sites must be Ilsted in the National Register of Historic
Places, either individually or as a contributing property within a National Register historic
district.
Owners of the assisted property must sign a Preservation Agreement. Grants in excess of
$5,000 require time-limited Restrictive Covenants registered with the deed to the property.
NOTE FOR CLG APPLICANTS: All projects must be located within the jurisdiction of the
approved local government.
APPLICATION PROCESS
Projects in CLG Jurisdictions: Send the completed original application and three copies to
the CLG in whose jurisdiction the project will take place by December 15. 1997. The CLG
commission will evaluate all applications received by the December 15 deadline and submit the
original and two copies to the HPO by January 31. 1998 (one copy should be retained for the
CLG's files).
Projects in Non-CLG Areas: Send the completed original application and two copies to the
HPO by January 31. 1998.
Mail original and two copies of applications to: Grants Administrator,
State Historic Preservation Office, 109 East Jones Street, Raleigh, NC 27601-2807.
(Note: applications sent by fax or a-mail are not acceptable)
Successful applications will be announced in March, 1998. Projects may begin
April 1, 1998.
Projects must be completed by July 31, 1999.
YOU SHOULD ALSO KNOW THAT:
* HPO staf)' will work with applicants to fully develop project proposal, including a realistic
budget (see contacts below).
* Grant funds may represent up to 609'0 of total project costs. The nonfederal matching
share must constitute at least 409'0 of project costs.
* Federal standards and accounting procedures apply to grants.
* Payment of grant funds is on a reimbursement basis.
13
4
SAMPLE PROJECTS
The following are some examples of recently funded HPF projects:
* Second and final phase of a comprehensive county architectural survey in a previously
unrecorded area. Project will add 350 additional properties to the inventory and provide the
basis for local preservation planning. ($15,000 non-CLG grant)
* Updates of 1970s surveys to help establish a planned preservation strategy for an azea
subject to extreme development pressure. Work will include approximately 10,000
structures in municipal neighborhoods, county communities, and rural areas. ($10,000
CLG grant)
* Preparation of a National Register Historic District nomination for approximately 150
properties in a mid-19th and early 20th century residential neighborhood threatened by
university expansion, student housing, and parking needs. ($4,000 CLG grant)
* Completion of exterior restoration of the oldest frame house in Western North Carolina to
allow public access and encourage interior restoration. ($10,000 CLG grant)
* Archaeological reconnaissance survey of 800 acres of an 18th century land grant, including
agricultural lands, pasture and woodlands, and residential tracts, to determine outbuilding
locations and search for a grist mill. ($7,500 CLG grant)
CONTACTS FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
e-mail: crbrown(~ncsl. dcr. state. nc. us
(East) Scott Power (919) 830-6580; fax: 830-6583
(West) Jennifer Martin (704) 274-6789; fax: 274-6995
(Piedmont) Catherine Bishir
Nominations to the National Re inter
Linda Edmisten (919) 733-6545; fax: 715-4801
e-mail: crbrown(~ncsl. dcr. state. nc. us
Melinda Coleman (919) 733-6545; fax: 715-4801
e-mail:crbrown(B?ncsl. dcr. state.nc. us
ArchaeoloQv
Stephen Claggett (919) 733-7342; fax: 715-2671
e-mail: azchaeology~ncsl. dcr. state. nc. us
Predevelogment or Development
A. L. Honeycutt, Jr., (919) 733-6547; fax: 715-4801
e-mail: swazd(~ncsl. dcr. state. nc. us
14
98insccu
General questions about applications or CLGs
Lloyd Childers (919) 733-4763; fax: 733-8653
e-mail: swazd@ncsl. dcr. state. nc. us
15
GOALS AND OBJECTIVES OF LEGACY
North Carolina's Comprehensive Historic Preservation Plan
Beginning October 1, 1996, all projects funded by the State Historic Preservation Office with
federal Historic Preservation Fund (HPF) grants must address one or more of the goals
included in Legacy, North Carolina's comprehei:sive historic preservation plan for the 1990s.
The goals and objects are printed below for your reference.
Please include in your project narrative reference to~ecific Goals and Objectives (e.g.#4A),
as well as describing how the project will meet the goals and objectives (e.g. by updating the
1976 architectural survey of Anytown, NC). Applications which do not address Legacy goals
and objectives will be eliminated from funding consideration. If you wish to discuss the goals
and objectives and whether the project you plan to submit will qualify under them, feel free to
call the staff members listed on page 4 of the instructions.
Goal #1--Education/Technical Assistance
Educate the public and public officials about the state's historic resources and preservation
programs. _ -
Objectives:
A. Develop statistics and data on the economic benefits of historic preservation and how
successfully preservation activities are working in North Carolina.
B. Promote historic preservation and North Carolina's historic resources through
educational materials and programs that are easily understood and accessible to all the
state's citizens and its leaders.
C. In partnership with preservation and educational organizations, including the
Department of Public Instruction and local boards of education, develop historic
preservation materials and programs for grades K through 12.
D. Cooperate with colleges and universities to incorporate historic preservation courses
and research projects into history, anthropology, planning, conservation, and any other
related curriculums.
E. Work~with community colleges and vocational training programs to develop technical
courses and apprenticeship programs that teach preservation skills and techniques.
F. Conduct workshops for building and planning professionals and cultural resources
consultants to enhance their knowledge of preservation techniques and programs
relevant to delivery of their services.
G. Provide technical assistance and expertise on historic preservation matters.
16
Page 2
Goal #2-- Planning
Integrate historic preservation into all levels of public planning to ensure the development and
implementation ofpreservation-compatible public policies and activities.
Objectives:
A. Clearly define the purpose and value of historic preservation in the larger context of
resource conservation and the quality of life in North Carolina.
B. Encourage the development of a statewide comprehensive land use plan with a strong
preservation element.
C. Encourage the incorporation of historic preservation into local and state comprehensive
planning.
D. Promote stewardship of historic resources as part of the conservation and protection of
the state's natural and historic environment.
E. Encourage local governments to integrate preservation with and make it relevant to
high-priority local needs and improvements such as housing, neighborhood -
conservation, community and economic development, beautification, anefficient
infrastructure, and delivery of service.
Goal #3-Enabling
Enable public agencies, private organizations, and the state's citizens to carry out successful
historic preservation planning, programs, and projects.
Objectives
A. Promote historic preservation's role in fostering and protecting a community's identity,
its livability, and its citizens' enjoyment of daily activities.
B. Provide support, information, and assistance for local governments and commissions in
carrying out successful preservation activities.
C. Support and facilitate the preservation efforts of local organizations, businesses, other
cultural and ethnic groups, special populations, volunteers, and individuals by
providing technical assistance, information, training, and grants.
Goal #4--Identification and Evaluation
Identify and evaluate the historic resources of North Carolina, including azchaeological,
architectural, historical, and traditional cultural properties.
Objectives .
A. Complete and periodically update the statewide azchitectural and azchaeological surveys
to recognize the diversity of the state's historic resources and the people and cultures
that produced them.
17
Page 3
B. Develop strategies to focus surveys in areas not yet inventoried and unable to match
survey and planning grants.
C. Integrate the results of all surveys and evaluations, including those generated by
Environmental Review, into the statewide survey.
D. Evaluate and nominate all properties eligible for listing in the National Register of
Historic Places (NRHP).
E. Publish and publicize survey results and NRHP nominations.
F. Clarify the purpose of the NRHP and the nomination process.
G. Incorporate new technology into survey procedures, data gathering, and storage.
Goal #S--Protection and Enhancement
Protect and enhance the state's significant historic properties and resources.
Objectives:
A. Coordinate with federal, state, and local agencies to ensure early consideration of
historic properties and cooperation in the environmental review process.
B. Strengthen state laws to protect historic resources affected by state or local
governmental plans or actions.
C. Strengthen North Carolinians' understanding of how they can make a difference in the
future of a historic property.
D. Promote the conservation and preservation of historic districts and landmarks through
local designation.
E. Develop incentives and legal mechanisms to preserve historic properties and stronger
disincentives for damaging or destroying them.
F. Foster a sense of stewardship for historic properties owned or controlled by public
agencies. .
G. Promote the stewardship and restoration of privately owned archaeological and historic
properties.
H. Provide for safe and efficient storage and retrieval of information about and artifacts
from historic properties.
r:
18
Page 4
Goal #~VI-Coordination
Provide support and a statewide framework for historic resources and local preservation
programs.
Objectives:
A. Provide opportunities for preservation, conservation/environmental, educational, and
other interested or affected agencies, organizations, or individuals to build partnerships
and communication.
B. Foster communication among local preservation commissions to exchange information
and strengthen their role in local planning and preservation issues.
C. Facilitate coordination among local, state, and federal government agencies in
preservation and in community and economic development.
D. Support the advocacy efforts of historic preservation and archaeological organizations
and revolving funds.
E. Foster a multicultural approach to preservation that encourages alliances across racial
and class lines.
F. Recommend statewide policies and priorities for the expenditure of public funds to
include historic properties and preservation.
G. Maintain a professionally staffed and adequately funded HPO within the DCR to
administer the state's historic preservation program.
H. Continue to develop and revise Legacy to reflect the changing needs, issues, and trends
of historic preservation.
lc:scauplan:goal-ob2
NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF ARCHIVES AND HISTORY 19
STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICE
NATIONAL REGISTER FACT SHEET 1
WHAT IS THE NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES?
The National Register of Historic Places is the nation's official list of buildings, structures, objects, sites, and
districts worthy of preservation for their significance in American history, azchitecture, archaeology, and
culture. The National Register was established by the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966. The
purpose of the Act is to ensure that as a matter of public policy, properties significant in national, state, and
local history aze considered in the planning of federal undertakings, and to encourage historic preservation
initiatives by state and local governments and the private sector.
What the National Register Means for the Private Property Owner
The listing of a property in the National Register places no obligation or restriction on a private owner using
private resources to maintain or alter the property. Over the yeazs, various federal incentives have been
introduced to assist private preservation initiatives. A private owner of a National Register property becomes
obligated to follow federal preservation standazds only if federal funding of licensing is used in work on the
property, or if the owner seeks and receives a special benefit that derives from National Register designation,
such as a grant or a tax credit described below.
National Register listing should not be confused with local historic property and historic district designations_
These designations are made by a local governing board on the recommendation of a local historic
preservation commission. This program of local designations is an option available to local governments
under North Carolina enabling legislation (G.S. 160A-400). Properties and districts listed in the National
Register sometimes also receive local designation in jurisdictions where local preservation commissions have
been established according to the state enabling legislation, but there is no direct correlation between
National Register listing and local designation.
National Register listing means the following:
1. Consideration and Protection in Public Planning:
All properties and districts listed in or eligible for listing in the National Register .aze considered in the
planning of federal undertakings such as highway construction and Community Development Block Grant
projects. "Federal undertakings" also include activities sponsored by state or local governments or private
entities if they are licensed or partially funded by the federal government. "Federal undertakings" do not
include loans made by banks insured by the FDIC or federal farm subsidies.
National Register listing does not provide absolute protection from federal actions that may affect the property.
It means that if a federal undertaking is in conflict with the preservation of a National Register property, the
North Cazolina Historic Preservation Office will negotiate with the responsible federal agency in an effort to
eliminate or minimize the effect on the historic property. This review procedure applies to properties that aze
determined eligible for the National Register in the day-to-day environmental review process as well as those
actually listed in the National Register.
Similarly, North Cazolina law (G.S. 121-12a) provides for consideration of National Register properties in
undertakings funded or licensed by the state. Where a state undertaking is in conflict with the preservation of
a National Register property, the North Cazolina Historical Commission is given the opportunity to review the
case and make recommendations to the state agency responsible for the undertaking. The commission's
recommendations to the state agency are advisory.
(see other side)
National Register Fact Sheet 1, Page 2 2 0 ~
2. Incentives for the Preservation of National Register Properties:
Tax Benefits. Under the Tax Reform Act of 1986, aprivately-owned building that is listed in the National Register
or is a contributing building in a National Register historic district may be eligible fora 20% federal income
investment tax credit claimed against the costs of a qualified rehabilitation of the building. These credits apply only
to income-producing, depreciable properties, including residential rental properties. The credits do not apply to
owner-occupied residential properties. The cost of the rehabilitation must equal or exceed the adjusted basis of the
building (original cost minus land value, minus previous depreciation, plus previous capital improvements). Plans for
the rehabilitation aze reviewed by the North Cazolina Historic Preservation Office and the National Pazk Service, and
work on the building must meet federal rehabilitation standazds. For more information and applications, contact the
Tax Act Coordinator at the address given below, or telephone (919) 733-6547.
Effective January 1, 1994, taxpayers who receive the federal income tax credit for rehabilitating certified historic
structures aze allowed to take as a credit against North Carolina income taxes an amount equal to one-fourth of the
federal credit.
The Tax Treatment Extension Act of 1980 provides federal tax deductions for charitable contributions of partial
interests (easements) in historically significant properties for conservation purposes. Interested individuals should
consult legal counsel or the local Internal Revenue Service office for assistance in determining the tax consequences
of the provisions of this act.
Grants and Loans. A limited program of matching grants for the rehabilitation of National Register properties,
including those that are privately owned, was authorized by the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, but has
not been funded to a significant degree since the early 1980s. A loan program authorized by the Act has never been
funded.
In 1993 and 1994, the North Cazolina General Assembly passed bills which provided funding to the Department of
Cultural Resources for grants to local historic organizations for fiscal years 1993-94 and 1994-95. The purpose of the
grants is to encourage the protection, preservation, and interpretation of historic assets with local or regional
significance. Priority consideration is given to properties listed in or eligible for listing in the National Register. The
deadline for grant applications for the second yeaz of funding was October 15, 1994. Continuation of this program in
future yeazs is dependent upon additional funding by the General Assembly.
NOTE: A privately owned property may not be listed in the National Register over the objection of its owner or, in the case of a
property with multiple owners, over the objection of a majority of owners. A district may not be listed in the National Register over the
objection of a majority of owners of private property within the proposed district. For a complete description of procedures for objecting
to a National Register nomination, see National Register Fact Sheet 5: "Procedure for Supporting or Objecting to National Register
Listing."
See also the following numbered National Register Fact Sheets:
2: "National Register Criteria for Evaluation"
3: "How Historic Properties Are Listed in the National Register of Historic Places"
4: "The National Register of Historic Places in North Cazolina: Facts and Figures"
See the handout entitled "A Comparison of the National Register of Historic Places with Local Historic Landmark and District
Designations" for a review of the differences between these two programs.
FOR MORE INFORMATION:
Historic structures and the National Register: Survey and Planning Branch, 919/733-6545.
Archaeological sites and the National Register: Office of State Archaeology, 919/733-7342.
Preservation tax credits and technical restoration assistance: Restoration Branch, 919/ 733-6547.
Environmental protection and planning: Environmental Review Coordinator, Administration Branch, 919/733-4763.
Written inquiries to each of these branches may be sent to the State Historic Preservation Office, N.C. Division of Archives and History,
109 E. Jones Street, Raleigh, North Carolina 27601-2807.
The National Register program is governed by the following federal and state rules and regulations: 36CFR Part 60 (interim rule),
36CFR Part 61 (final rule), and North Carolina Administrative Code T07:04R .0300.
NORTH CAROLINA DMSION OF ARCHIVES AND HISTORY 21
STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICE
NATIONAL REGISTER FACT SHEET
NATIONAL REGISTER C'RiTF.R1A FOR EVALUATION
The following criteria are designed to guide the states, federal agencies, and the Secretary of the Inte-
rior in evaluating potential entries for the National Register.
The quality of significance in American history, architecture, archaeology, and culture is present in
districts, sites, buildings, structures, and objects that possess integrity of location, design, setting,
materials, workmanship, feeling, and association, and:
A. that are associated with events that have made sign cant contribution to the broad patterns of
our history; or .
B. that are associated with the lives of persons significant in our past; or
C. that embody the distinctive characteristics of a type, .period, or method of construction, or that
represent the work of a master, or that possess high, artistic values, or that represent a significant
and distinguishable entity whose components may. lack individual distinction; or _
D. that have yielded, or may be likely to yield, information important in prehistory or history.
Criteria Considerations (Exceptions): Ordinarily cemeteries, birthplaces, or graves of historical fig-
ures, properties owned by religious institutions or used for. religious purposes, structures that have
been moved from their original locations, reconstructed historic buildings, properties primarily com-
memorative in nature, and properties that have achieved sign~cance within the past SO years shall
not be considered eligible for the National Register. However, such properties will quay if they are
iraegral pans of districts that do meet the criteria or if they fall within the following categories:
A. a religious property deriving primary significance from architectural or artistic distinction or his-
torical importance; or
B. a building or structure removed from its original location but which is significant primarily for
architectural value, or which is the surviving structure most importantly associated with a historic
person or event; or
C. a birthplace or grave of a historical figure of outstanding importance if there is no other
appropriate site or building directly associated with his or her productive life; or
D. a cemetery that derives its primary significance from graves of persons of transcendent impor-
. lance, from age, from distinctive design features, or from association with historic events; or
E. a reconsm~cted building when accurately executed in a suitable environment and presented in a
dignified manner as part of a restoration master plan, and when no other building or structure
with the same~association has survived; or
F. a property primarily commemorative in intent if design, age, tradition, or symbolic value has
invested it with its own historical significance; or
G. a property achieving signi, ficance within the past SO years if it is of exceptional importance.
(see other side)
APPLYIIVG THE CRITERIA
National Register Fact Sheet 2, Page 2 '
22
The two principal issues to consider in determining eligibility for the National Register are "significance" and "integrity."
A property may have "significance" for association with important events or patterns of history (criterion A); for association with
as important historical figure (criterion B); as as important example of period architecture, landscape, or engineering (criterion C);
or for the information it is likely to yield (criterion D, applied to archaeological sites and districts, and sometimes applied W certain
types of structures). A National Register nomination must demonstrate how a property is significant in at least one of these four
areas. For properties nominated under criterion A, frequently cited areas of significance are agriculture, community planning and
development, social history, commerce, industry, politics and government, education; recreation and culture, and others. For tech-
nical reasons, criterion B (significant person) nominations are rare. Criterion C (architecture) is cited for most, but not all, nomina-
tions of historic buildings. Archaeological sites are always nominated under criterion D, but may also have significance under one
or more of the other three criteria. .
Properties are nominated at either a local, state, or national level of signifcance iiepeading on the geographical range of the impor-
tance of a property and its associations. The level of significance must be justified in the nomination. The majority of properties
(about 7096) are listed at the local level of signifcance. The level of significance has no effect on the protections or beaefita of list-
lag. '.
Besides meeting one or more of the above criteria, a property must also have "integrity" of 'location, design, setting, materials,
workmanship, feeling, sad association.' This means that the property must retain enough of its historic physical character (or in the
case of archaeological sites, intact archaeological features) to represent its historic period sad associations adequately.
All properties change over time, and in soma cases past alterations can take on historical significance is their own right. The degree
to which more recent, incompatible, or non historic alterations are acceptable depends on the type of property, its rarity, and its
period and area of significance. Buildings with certain types of alterations are usually turned down by the National Register
Advisory Committee. For example, 19th sad early 20th century wood frame buildings that have bees brick veneered in the mid-
20th century are routinely turned down for loss of historic integrity.
Criteria Exceptions
The criteria exclude birthplaces and graves of historical figures, cemeteries, religious properties, moved buildings, reconstructions,
commemorative properties, and properties less than SO years old, with certain exceptions. T1ie following exceptions are sometimes
encountered: '
Historic churches that retain sufficient architectural integrity can usually be successfully nominated under criterion C (architecture),
sometimes together with criterion A for social or religious history.
Genets ies may sometimes successfully be nominated wader criterion C when they retain important examples ofhistoric stone carv-
ing, funerary art, and/or landscaping, and they also may be eligible wader criterion A or criterion D. However, both the National
Register Advisory Committee and the National Regrstet have turned down nominations of graves when the historical importance of
the deceased is the sole basis for the nomination. The National Register was created primarily to recognize and protect historic
places and environmeata that represent how people lived, worked, and built is the historic past. Human burials are recognized and
protected under other laws and programs.
Moved buildings may sometiaaa be successfully nominated under c-riterioa C for architecture when they remain is their historic
communities and the new setting adequately replicates the original setting. The point to remember is that the program is called the
National Register of Historic Places. not HrBtOr'1C Buildings or Historic Things, because significance i8 embodied iII locations sad
settings as well as is the structures themselves. Buildings moved great distances, buildings moved into incompatible settings (such
as a farmhouse moved into as usbsa neighborhood or a downtown residence moved to a suburb), and collections of buildings
moved from various locations to crate a psenda-historic 'villaga' are routinely turned down, Ia soma cases, the relocation of a hia-
toric building to a distant or incompatible setting may be the last sad only way to save it, sad such an umdertaldng may ba
worthwhile. However, sponsors of such a project must understand that the property dY may not be eligible for the
National Register.
If a property is less than SO years old, it can be nominated only if a strong argnmeat can be made for exceptional significance. For
example, Dorton Arena oa the State Fairgrounds was completed in 1953. It was successfully nominated to the National Register is
1973 as ono of the most important examples of modernism is post W WII American arahit~ecs<ue.
03/24/95
NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF ARCHIVES AND HISTORY 2 3
STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICE
NAT70NAL REGISTER FACT SHEET
HOW HISTORIC PROPERTIES ARE LISTED IN
THE NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES
Who Administers the National Register Program?
The National Register of Historic Places is a list maintained by the National Park Service of build-
ings, structures, sites, objects, and districts that are significant in American history, architecture,
archaeology, engineering, and culture, and that meet criteria for evaluation established by the
National Historic Preservation Act of 1966. Nominations to the National Register aze submitted from
each of the states by the State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO). In North Cazolina, the SHPO
is the Director of the Division of Archives and History. 1fie section within the Division that adminis-
ters the National Register and related programs is the Archaeology and Historic Preservation Section,
also called the Historic Preservation Office (HPO). The personnel of the Historic Preservation
Office serve as staff for the SHPO in National Register activities and duties.
In every state, a review board examines potential nominations and makes recommendations to the
SHPO regazding the eligibility of properties and the adequacy of nominations. In North Carolina, the
review board is called the National Register Advisory Committee (NRAC). The NRAC meets
quarterly (January, April, July, October) to consider the eligibility of properties for nomination to the
National Register. ~ Nominations prepared under the supervision of the HPO staff and approved by the
NRAC are forwarded to the Keeper of the National Register in the National Park Service in Washing-
ton, D. C. Final authority to list properties in the National Register resides with the National Park Ser-
vice.
How are Eligible Properties Identified?
Properties and districts that may be eligible for the National Register are usually brought to the atten-
tion, of the HPO staff and the NRAC either (1) through a county or community survey of historic
properties co-sponsored by the Historic Preservation Office and a local government or organization;
(2) by interested individuals who provide preliminary information about properties to the HPO staff;
or (3) through historic property surveys conducted as part of the environmental review process.
Persons who seek National Register listing for properties that have not been recorded in survey
projects co-sponsored by the Historic Preservation Office may submit a "~tud~List AvRlication" to
the HPO. If adequate information and color slides of the property are included with the application,
the NRAC will consider the property at its next quarterly meeting. If in the opinion of the NRAC the
property appeazs to be potentially eligible for the National Register, it is placed on the Study List.
This action by the NRAC authorizes the HPO staff to work with the owner to coordinate a formal
nomination of the property to the National Register.
The NRAC can best evaluate the eligibility of an individual property within the context of a
community-wide or regional inventory of historic or prehistoric properties. This provides a basis for
comparing the relative significance of similaz types of historic or .prehistoric properties in a com-
munity or region. In counties or communities where no such inventory has been assembled, the NRAC
will sometimes find it necessary to defer a decision about the eligibility of an individual property until
a comprehensive survey of historic properties has taken place. Likewise, the NRAC may consider
some properties as contributing components within larger districts but not as individually eligible.
Information about grants to local governments for local historic property surveys and nominations is
available from the Historic Preservation Office.
(see other side)
24
National Register Fact Sheet 3, Page 2
What is a National Register Nomination?
A National Register nomination is a scholarly and authoritative document that thoroughly describes
and evaluates a property's setting and physical characteristics, documents its history, assesses its sig-
nificance in terms of its historic context, and demonstrates how it specifically meets National Register
criteria for evaluation. It is supported by professional quality black and white photographs, maps
delineating the property's boundanes, and other materials and information. The nomination must be
prepazed according to federal and state guidelines.
Who Prepares National Register Nominations?
Most nominations aze prepazed by private consultants hired either by individual property owners or by
local governments or organizations. Nominations of archaeological sites aze sometimes prepared by
professional azchaeologists as part of their on-going research. HPO National Register staff is
responsible for reviewing, editing, and processing nominations prepared in these ways. Due to the
great demand for National Register nominations, the small HPO staff is unable to prepare nominations
as a public service.
An owner of a Study List property who seeks to have it listed in the National Register may hire a pri-
vate consultant to prepare the nomination. A list of qualified consultants is available from the His-
toric Preservation Office. HPO staff cannot quote fees, and fees will vary depending on the consul-
tant and the complexity of the nomination. An owner may expect to pay a professional historian,
architectural historian, or azchaeologist the equivalent of 40 to 80 hours of time at a professional
hourly wage.
Some owners aze interested in preparing their own nominations and aze capable of doing so. A packet
that includes the NPS instruction manual, the supplementary state instruction manual, and sample
nominations may be purchased from the Historic Preservation Office for $10.00. The level of
description, historical documentation, analysis, and writing in every nomination must meet accepted
professional standazds. The SHPO will not submit substandard norrunations to Washington, and HPO
staff cannot make major revisions or provide detailed critiques of inadequate nominations. Because
documentation of azchaeological properties always involves excavation, analysis, and interpretation
requiring specialized training, nomuations of azchaeological properties are always prepazed by profes-
sional archaeologists.
What Happens to the Finished Nomination?
The nomination is reviewed by members of the National Register Advisory Committee at one of the
regular quarterly meetings. If the NRAC recommends that the nomination be submitted to the
National Register, it is signed by the State Historic Preservation Officer and forwarded to the Keefer
of the National Register. At the National Register office, the nomination is reviewed and the decision
to list or not list is made within not less than 15 and not more than 45 days of receipt. If the property
is listed, the HPO will notify the owner and provide a certificate stating that the property has been
listed in the National Register of Historic Places. Owners who desire plaques may order them from
private commercial suppliers. The HPO does not provide plaques or recommend any particular sup-
plier, but a list of manufacturers is available on request.
FOR MORE INFORMATION CONTACT: National Register Coordinator
Survey aad Plaaning Branch
State Historic Preservation Office
N.C. Division of Archives sad History
109 East Jones Strcet
Raleigh, North Carolina 27601-2807 919/733545
Offices of the Survey sad Planniag Breach are at 515 N. Blouat Street is Raleigh. For information about archaoological
. sites and the National Register, contact the Officx of State Archaeology at the above address or telephone 919/733-7342.
03/08/95
NORTH CAROLINA DMSION OF ARCHIVES AND HISTORY 2 5
STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICE
NATIONAL REGISTER FACT SHEET /~
T
Tk~ NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES ]N NORTH CAROLINA:
FACTS AND FIGURES
. There are over 62,000 listings of historic buildings, structures, sites, objects, and districts in the
National Register across the United States and its territories.
. The first nominations from North Cazolina were submitted in 1969. Today there aze approximately
1,900 National Register listings in the state. ]n recent years the state has submitted an average of
60 new nominations per yeaz to the National Register. Most nominations aze prepared by private
consultants working for local governments or for private property owners. Nominations are
carefully prepared and screened in the review process, and 99 9b of all nominations from North
Carolina have been successfully listed. A list of all National Register entries in North Cazolina as
of the end of the most recent half-calendar dear, arranged alphabetically by county and giving
name, town or vicinity, and date listed, is available from the State Historic Preservation Office for
$5.00.
. Of the 1,900 total listings in North Cazolina, about 250 are historic districts, some of which
contain several hundred contributing historic buildings or sites:.Types of districts include
residential neighborhoods, commercial districts, prehistoric and historic archaeological districts,
industrial complexes, mill villages, and rural farming districts, Since the first historic district
nominations did not include complete lists of all properties within district boundaries, it is not
possible to determine the precise number of historic properties in North Carolina that are listed in
the National Register. The National Pazk Service..estimates that. approximately 30,000 historic
properties in North . Cazolina are listed in the National Register either as individual listings or as
contributing properties within districts. Properties within districts that contribute to the historic
character of the district are eligible for federal environmental protections and benefits to the same
extent as if they were individually listed. ~ .
. Of all North Carolina properties listed in the National Register, approximately 85 % aze privately
owned and 15 % publicly owned. About 70 % are listed at a local level of significance, 25 9b at a
statewide level, and 5 ~ at a national level of significance. The level of significance at which a
property or district is listed does not affect its eligibility for benefits or the consideration it receives
in environmental review processes. .
. North Cazolina's National Register listings reflect the whole spectrum of the state's human
experience through its long history: prehistoric Indian sites; shipwreck sites; modest log houses of
settlers and slaves; houses and outbuildings of ordinary farmers and townspeople; the mansions of
wealthy planters and merchants; churches of all sizes and denominations; courthouses, schools and
other public buildings; commercial buildings of many types; and industrial and transportation
buildings and sites. Lastwgs vary from 10,000-year-old archaeological sites to the 1953 Dorton
Arena at the State Fairgrounds. What all these places have in common is that they reveal in a
tangible way some important aspect of past life in North Carolina and its diverse communities.
. The State Historic Preservation Offiice reviews over 2,500 federal and state actions annually to
determine their potential effects on properties listed in or eligible for listing in the National
Register. Where a federal or state undertaking is in conflict with the preservatton of a National
Register property, the State Historic Preservation Office will negotiate with the responsible agency
in an ahempt to eliminate or rnmimize the effect under rocedures prescribed by -federal law
(Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 19~ or state law (G.S. 121-12a).
(see ocher side)
26
National Register Fact Sheet 4, Page 2
. Between 1976 and 1993, 803 National Register properties in North Carolina were rehabilitated
under federal historic preservation tax incentive programs, representing an investment of over
5286,000,000 in National Register properties in the state.
. The Restoration Branch of the State Historic Preservation Office offers technical restoration
consultation services to owners of historic properties, including municipal and county governments,
churches, businesses, and private property owners. Restoration Branch staff provides consultation
services to more than 1,500 historic properties in a typical year. Restoration staff is located in
Raleigh (919/733-6547), Asheville (704/274-6789), and Greenville (919/830-6580).
. Since the mid-1970s three-fifths of North Carolina's 100 counties and scores of municipalities have
participated in survey and planning grant projects co-sponsored with the State Historic Preservation
Office to conduct comprehensive surveys of histonc properties and prepare nominations of
properties and districts to the National Register of Historic Places. Many other counties have
participated in regional reconnaissance surveys. The .Survey and Planning Branch maintains an
estimated 65,000 survey files with photographs and information about historic structures. The
Office of State Archaeology maintains information concerning the approximately 25,000
prehistoric and historic archaeological sites recorded in the state. Thirty-seven counties and twent~r-
five municipalities have published historic architecture survey catalogues, many of which are still
in print and available for purchase from the State Historic Preservation Office.
For iafon~ation about why the National Register was created and what listing means to a property owner, see NATIONAL
REGISTER FACT SHEET 1, "WHAT IS THB NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES?"
For as explanation of National Register criteria for evaluation, see NATIONAL REGISTER FACT SHEET 2, "NATIONAL
REGISTER CRITERIA FOR EVALUATION.'
For information about how properties sad districts are listed is the National Register, see NATIONAL REGISTER FACT
SHEET 3, 'HOW HISTORIC PROPERTIES ARE LISTED IN THE NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES."
See the handout titled "A COMPARISON OP THE NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES WITH LOCAL
HISTORIC LANDMARK AND DISTRICT DESIGNATIONS" for an explanation of the differences between the two
ProBm~•
FOR MORE INFORMATION:
Historic structures and the National Register. Survey and Planning Branch, 919/733-6545.
Archaeological sites and the National Registex: t]ffce of State Archaeology, 919/733-7342.
Preservation tax credits and technical restoration assistance: Restoration Branch, 919/733547.
Greats to local governments and organizations for historic property surveys and National Register nominations: Groats
Coordinator, Administration Branch, 919/733-4763.
Lists of available architecdiral survey publications: Administrative Assistant, Administration Branch, 919/733-4763.
Address correspondence to the appropriate broach named above at the State HisWriC Freservation Office, N.C. Division of
Archives sad History, 109 E. Jones Street, Raleigh, N.C. 27601 2807.
The National Register Program is governed by the following federal and state tales and regulations: 36CFR Part 60
(interim rule), 36CFR Part 61 (final rule), and North Carolina Administrative Code T07: 04R .0300.
7/15/94
NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF ARCHIVES AND HISTORY 2 7
STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICE
NATIONAL REGISTER FACT SHEET 5
PROCEDURE FOR SUPPORTING OR OBJECTING TO
NATIONAL REGISTER LISTING
Under federal law a privately owned property may not be listed in the National Register over the objection of its owner
or, in the case of a property with multiple owners, over the objection of a majority of owners. A district may not be
listed in the National Register over the objection of a majority of owners of private property within the proposed
district.
Supporting a National Register Nomination:
Private owners who seek National Register listing for their properties are not required to submit statements of
concurrence, though letters of support of the nomination aze welcomed and become a permanent part of the nomination
file. Owners who wish to support aze nomination aze encouraged to submit letters of support to the State Historic
Preservation Officer prior to the National Register Advisory Committee meeting at which the nomination is to be
considered.
Objecting to a National Register Nomination:
Any owner or partial owner of a nominated private property who chooses to object to listing must submit to the State
Historic Preservation Officer a notarized statement certifying that he or she is sole or partial owner of the private
property and objects to the listing. Each owner or partial owner of the property has one vote regardless of what part of
the property or how much property the individual owns. Owners who wish to object are encouraged to submit
statements of objection prior to the meeting of the National Register Advisory Committee at which the nomination is
being considered. However, statements of objection may be submitted and will be counted up until the actual date of
listing, which usually takes place at least 15 days but not more than 45 days after the nomination is mailed to the
Keeper of the National Register following the National Register Advisory Committee meeting.
If a majority of private property owners should object, the property or district will not be listed. However, in such
cases the State Historic Preservation Officer is required to submit the nomination to the Keeper of the National
Register for a determination of eligibility for the National Register. If the property or district is determined eligible for
listing, although not formally listed, it will be treated as a listed property or district for purposes of federal undertakings
in the environmental review process. Such properties aze not eligible for federal preservation grants or tax credits until
the objections aze withdrawn and the property is listed.
Address letters of support or objection to:
State Historic Preservation Officer
N.C. Division of Archives and History
109 E. Jones Street
Raleigh, Nortlt Cazolina 27601-2807
National Register Advisory Committee meetings are open to the public. Meetings normally are held the second
Thursday of January, April, July, and October in room 211 of the Archives and History Building, 109 E. Jones
St., Raleigh. For more information, call 919/733-6545.
FOR MORE INFORMATION:
Historic structures and the National Register: Survey and Planning Branch, 919/733-6545.
Archaeological sites and the National Register: Office of State Archaeology, 919/733-7342.
Preservation tax credits and technical restoration assistance: Restoration Branch, 919/ 733-6547.
The National Register program is governed by the following federal and state rules and regulations: 36CFR Part 60 (interim rule), 36CFR
Part 61 (final rule), and North Carolina Administrative Code T07:04R .0300.
ORANGE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT
28
306F REVERE ROAD
HILLSBOROUGH, NORTH CAROLINA 2,2~g DRAFT
volt u w
~e
~~
v s
HISTORIC PRESERVATION CObIlVIISSION
January 31, 1998
Dear St. Mary's Road Property Owner:
The Orange County Historic Preservation Commission (HPC) is proposing a study on the history of the St.
Mary's Road corridor.
St. Mary's Road (NCSR 1002) in Orange County includes much of what was known as the Indian
Trading Path. This route extended from present-day Petersburg, Virginia, to the North Carolina-South
Carolina border and beyond. During colonial times, it was a major route of travel into Orange County.
A number of historic sites are located along St. Mary's Road.
The Historic Preservation Commission believes the St. Mary's RoadlTrading Path Corridor contains
suitable characteristics to qualify as a historic district. With the approval of the Orange County Board of
Commissioners, the HPC has applied for grant funds to conduct a study that would lead to the eventual
nomination of the St. Mary's Road/Trading Path Corridor to the National Register of Historic Places.
For owners of historic properties within a National Register district, listing on the Register is a
prestigious honor, for a property that is listed on the National Register of Historic Places has been
deemed important to the Nation's heritage. The listing of a property in the National Re i~¢ ster places no
obligation or restriction on the private landowner usin¢ private resources to maintain or alter the
ro .Owners of National Register sites may benefit from the availability of federal tax credits for
rehabilitation of income-producing properties, such as rental and commercial buildings. National
Register sites are also given a higher level of review by the state and federal government when federally
funded projects, such as road construction, may adversely affect the area.
A "National Register Fact Sheet" is enclosed that describes the National Register of Historic Places and
what it means to the property owner. If you have any questions about the proposed study, please contact
our staffperson, Don Belk, at 732-8181, extension 2594. We also invite you to attend a meeting of the
Historic Preservation Commission. The HPC meets every fourth Wednesday at 7:00 PM at the Planning
and Agricultural Center at 306 Revere Road in Hillsborough.
Sincerely,
Tom Allison, Chair