Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes - 19861103 ~~~ MINUTES ORANGE COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS REGULAR MEETING NOVEMBER 3, 1986 The Orange County Board of Commissioners met in regular session on Monday, November 3, 1986, 7:30 p.m. in Superior Courtroom, Orange County Courthouse, Ha.].lsborough, North Carolina. BOARD MEMBERS PRESENT: Chair Don Willhoit, and Commissioners Moses Carey, Ben Lloyd and Norman Walker. BOARD MEMBER ABSENT: Shirley Marshall. ATTORNEY PRESENT: Geoffrey Gledhill.. STAFF PRESENT: County Manager Ken Thompson, Assistant County Managers William Laws and Albert Kittrell, Clerk to the Board Beverly A. Blythe, Planning Director Marvin Collins, Purchasing Director Pam Jones, Planners Gene Bell and Brad Torgan, Sheriff Lindy Pendergrass and Personnel Director Beverly Whitehead. A. BOARD COMMENTS At the request of the County Manager Chair Willhoit added an executive session for the purpose of discussing a personnel matter. He announced that Commissioner Marshall will not be in attendance because of a flight delay. B. AUDIENCE COMMENTS - 1. MATTERS ON THE PRINTED AGENDA Those persons who wish to speak to matters on the printed .agenda will be recognized at the time their specific item appears on the agenda. 2. MATTERS NOT ON THE PRINTED AGENDA None C. MINUTES Motion was made by Commissioner Carey, seconded by Commissioner Lloyd to approve the minutes for October 6 as corrected. VOTE: UNANIMOUS. Motion was made by Commissioner Carey, seconded by Commissioner Lloyd to approve the minutes for October 21 as circulated. VOTE: UNANIMOUS. D. PUBLIC HEARING ON THE PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE INSPECTION FEE SCHEDULE Director of Planning Marvin Collins presented for the purpose of receiving public comment the proposed amendments to the Inspection Fee Schedule. This was presented at public hearing on October 6, 1986 and continued to this meeting. Collins explained in detail the proposed amendments and clarified the application of fees for certain types of construction and the plan review/approval procedures. In addition, the provision regarding "Late Fees" would be incorporated and all schedules containing fees ending in $ .50 would be rounded off to be consistent with the computerized permit system program. In answer to a question from Commissioner Carey about inspections when there is a change in occupancy for commercial property, Collins explained that whenever there classification to another, the determine if that building is requirements. Collins clarified Inspection Fee Schedule we surrounding jurisdictions. Collins responded members of the audience o that many of the fees we County. - is a change in occupancy building inspector looks still in compliance with from one commercial at the building to the new occupancy for Commissioner Lloyd that the increases to the re based on a comparison of fees in many of the to several specific questions from the Board and n items listed on the fee schedule. He explained re state mandated and beyond the control of the PUBLIC COMMENTS Dixie Knight, Knight Heating and Air Conditioning, spoke in opposition to the proposed increased fees for the installation of heating and/or air conditioning equipment. Harold Colclough asked about the installation of a hot water heater and Collins explained that for any installation of any plumbing or heating system, the electrical work must be performed by a licensed contractor. The sole exception is if the homeowner is doing the installation. In all cases a permit must be secured and an inspection performed. Donna Cooler asked about the increase in fees for the moving of a mobile home. She questioned why park owners were not notified. Collins explained that the inspection fee schedule was part of the budget process and that public hearings were advertised for the purpose of receiving citizen input. WITH NO FURTHER COMMENTS FROM THE AUDIENCE, THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED. .:;_';. E. JAIL REPORT -~~ The report of the inspection that was performed September 25, 1986 of the Orange County Jai]. facility was received and acknowledged by the Board. F. ITEMS FOR DECISION - CONSENT AGENDA Fl and F3 were removed from the consent agenda and placed under items for decision as items G16 and G17. The County Manager recommended the fallowing action by the Board: 2. LEASE AGREEMENT RENEWAL - SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION OFFICE Approve the renewal of a lease with Centel for office space currently occupied by Soil and Water Department personnel at a monthly rental of $200 per month for a period of one year .beginning December 1, 1986 and ending November 30, 1987 and authorize the Chair to sign. 4. BUDGET AMENDMENT Amend the 1986-87 Budget ordinance by the following changes: GENERAL FUND Appropriation - Social Services $ 1,040 Source - OPC Foster Parent Training $ 1,040 JAIL CAPITAL PROJECT FUND Appropriation - Rewiring $ 1,700 Source - Ccunty Capital Projects $ 1,700 COUNTY CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND Appropriation - Jail Capital Project $ 1,700 Source - Fund Balance Appropriated $ 1,700 5. APPRAISAL SERVICES CONTRACT - Approve a revised appraisal services contract for the Efland sewer ~~ project with Ms. Kathy Buck to perform services at a cost of $150.00 per parcel and authorize the Chair to sign. 6. EMERGENCY AID AND ASSISTANCE CERTIFICATE -_~S Approve the issuance of a certificate to the Mebane Fire Department granting them the right to regularly respond to requests for emE~gency aid and assistance, and to administer medical aid and assistance to patients in emergency medical situations. Motion was made by Commissioner Lloyd, seconded by Commissioner Carey to approve items 2, 4, 5, and 6 of the consent agenda. VOTE: UNANIMOUS. G. ITEMS FOR DECISION 1. PROPOSED ZONING ORDINANCE TEXT AMENDMENTS (1) DESIGN STANDARDS - EXISTING MOBILE HOME PARKS Marvin Collins presented for Board consideration proposed amendments to the Zoning Ordinance. Concerns have been identified by mobile home park owner/operators and residents about the application of design standards in Article 6.21.1a)2). Deletion of this Article from the Zoning Ordinance would "grandfather" existing parks, excluding them from the application of new design standards. The proposed text amendments would exclude existing mobile home parks from complying with new design standards for mobile home parks. The Planning Board approval of the proposed amendments and the deletion of Article 6.21.1a)2) is based on the understanding that the Mobile Home Park Advisory Group will meet with the Ordinance Review Committee and Planning Board to ,develop standards for parks which address health and safety issues. Motion was made by Commissioner Lloyd, seconded by Commissioner Walker that Article 6.21.1(a)(2) of the Orange County Zoning Ordinance, as amended March 18, 1986 and which reads ". and (2) that .the space be improved in accordance with Subsection 7.20.4(a) of this Ordinance" be deleted. VOTE: UNANIMOUS. The following are verbatim minutes as requested by the Board of commissioners: Marvin Collins - In October the Planning Board met following the public hearing on October 6 and they recommended of the proposed amendments that being the deletion of Article 6.21.1a (2). They made that recommendation based on the understanding that the mobile home park advisory board would meet with the Ordinance Review Committee of the Planning Board in developing standards for parks which address health and safety issues. That Advisory Board has met on two separate occasions with the Ordinance Review Committee and will meet again this week. They have been addressing health and safety issues as well as design standards that relate to new mobile home parks. The issue of whether or not the standards would apply to existing parks in the future is still a question by the Ordinance Review Committee and the Mobile Hvme Park Advisory Board which has to be resolved. They are meeting and discussing standards for the~~ new parks . Don Willhoit - The recommendation of the Planning Board is the deletion of Article 6.2.1.1a(2). Is there a motion? Sen Lloyd - Mr. Chairman I move that Article 6.21.1(a)(2) of the Orange County Zoning Ordinance as amended March 18, 1986, the exact wording that reads as follows; that Article 6.21.1(a)(2) of the Orange County Zoning i ~~~ ordinance, as amended March 18, 1986 and which reads ". and (2) that the space be improved in accordance with Subsection 7.20.4(a) of this Ordinance." I move that be deleted from the Ordinance Norman Walker: I second the motion. Ben Lloyd: That is the article of concern - Arta.cle 6.21.1(a)(2) of the Zoning Ordinance referring back to subsection 7.2.04. Thats where the problem lies and my motion is just simply Don Willhoit: Your motion is then to move approval of the Planning Board recommendation. Ben Lloyd: I want specifically, this removes the present mobile home parks from any of the new regulations that was passed on March 18. Don Willhoit: And that is the Planning Board recommendation. Is that not right Mr. Jacobs. Barry Jacobs: Yes. Don Willhoit: The comment on the agenda item which was based on the understanding - I think that is what you are objecting to -~ that is not part of our motion that is the Planning Board - they have established a Mobile Home Advisory Group which I thought was something the mobile home park owners and the people that live in mobile home parks wanted. That they wanted to establish this advisory board and as I read what the recommendation of the Planning Board is that they plan to continue meeting with that Advisory Board to try to work out regulations which are acceptable to you all. -~~` Ben Lloyd: This is another matter - the motion deals specifically with removing the action that was taken on March 18. Now if its the matter of having this review committee, I think it was expressed by some of the mobile park owners that that was their desire. I approve of that but that is not a part of the motion. I'm sure that that will be a reality. Don Willhoit: I was trying to point out that the Planning Board recommendation that its Ordinance Review Committee continue to meet with the Mobile Home Advisory Board does not affect the Planning Board recommendation to delete that article. (Article 6.21.1 (a)(2)). Don Willhoit: I want to make it clear that that is the Planning Board recommendation. No Comment was made by anyone. Dori Willhoit: There is a motion and a second. Those is favor of the motion say aye. (All said aye). Opposed -(none) -motion carries. (2) OFF-STREET PARKING (HANDICAPPED PARKING FACILITIES) Marvin Collins presented for consideration of approval the proposed amendments to Section l0 of the Zoning Ordinance. The Planning Board recommended approval. Motion was made by Commissioner Carey, seconded by Commissioner Lloyd to approve the Planning Board recommendation. The amendment adds to Section 10.3 b) that "Handicapped parking spaces shall have a minimum width of 13 feet and length of 20 feet." and adds Section 10.8 Handica ed Parking Facilities which reads: "A minimum of two (2) spaces per parking lot or at least ~~~ one (1) handicapped parking space for every twenty (20) standard parking spaces or fraction thereof, whichever is greater, shall be designed for use by the physically handicapped. Such spaces shall be clearly marked and reserved for the exclusive use by handicapped persons. A sign designating the space for the physically handicapped shall be placed at the head of the space. Handicapped spaces shall be placed within 100 feet of the major entrance of the building or function. Curb cuts or r-amps shall be provided for each space for access to adjoining walkways or paths. VOTE: UNANIMOUS. 2. RAW WATER STORAGE ELEVATION AT LAKE ORANGE Ken Thompson presented for a response from the Board a previous request from the Town of Hillsborough that Lake orange be raised two feet. He stated that Hazen and Sawyer Engineers have studied the situation and have determined that the property abutting the lake would not be flooded if the lake was raised one cr two feet. They have outlined that a collapsible flashboard system could be installed to. increase available spillway capacity in the event of the 100 year flood. The cost of the improvements would be approximately the same for a one or two foot increase. Thompson noted that the opinion among the lakefront property owners appears to be divided on what to do with the lake level. He outlined two alternatives: (1) Proceed with engineering design to raise the lake by 1 foot, or (2) Poll the residents to determine their views on raising the.-,~ lake 2 feet and authorize engineering design to go to 2 feet contingent upon obtaining clear title. Chair Willhoit proposed for discussion purposes that the --- engineering be designed to raise the lake level one foot but have the capability to raise the lake two feet and that a survey be taken of the .property owners on raising the lake level two feet. Chair Willhoit further explained his proposal and Don Cordell explained the collapsible system and how the level monitoring system would alert County officials of impending high lake levels. PUBLIC COMMENTS Michael Spears, representing the group led by Betsy Tilley, spoke briefly about the equity and fairness of raising the level without the County maintaining clear title. He talked about the necessity of considering other water sources in the long range. Wayne Tilley, Lake Orange property owner, briefly described in chronological order the events that led to this point in time. He reviewed the cost estimates far the project and made comments about the improvements that would be necessary to the property abutting, the Lake if the.. lake was raised two feet. Pat Key, Lake Orange property owner, asked that the County determine at the .outset if the Lake will be raised one or two feet. She had the understanding when she purchased her property that Lake orange was a backup water supply, but now understands that Lake Orange is the main water supply. She made reference to the protection as stated in her deed between the 615 and 620 foot elevation level and questioned the legality of raising the Lake two feet. Randy Medlin, Lake orange property owner, read and presented a petition with signatures from 29 property owners. The Petition reads as follows: "We the following landowners of waterfront property of Lake Orange, Orange County North Carolina, are in favor of raising the level of Lake Orange two feet (24") (from elevation 614 to elevation 616), provided the County of Orange take necessary steps to insure that no Lake Orange Lake front property be ~- lessened in value by the Lake level increase proposed." Sob Glutaueff, Lake Orange property owner, expressed concern about the original development of Lake orange and the subsequent agreements with those who donated land for the Lake. He stated that it is evident that Lake orange will continue to be~drained and the landowners will have minimum use of the Lake. Horace Johnson, Water Commissioner for the Town of Hillsborough, reiterated that the Town Council in April, 1.986 stated their position to raise Lake Orange by two feet. He noted that the reservoir .was not built for recreational purposes but to provide raw water storage for Northern Orange County to be used by all of Orange County. The long range plan is to build a new reservoir and to complete the water line to Durham. Motion was made by Commissioner Carey, seconded by Chair Willhoit to authorize that the County Manager draw up an engineering agreement to be brought back to the Board for approval to proceed with the engineering design to raise the level of Lake Orange by one foot with the design to be capable of raising the Lake two feet with the use of flashboards and contingent upon resolving property ownership, and to further authorize the County Manager to complete a survey of the Lake Orange property owners to determine their concerns about and support for this project. VOTE: UNANIMOUS. 3. PROPOSED AMENDMENTS - INSPECTION FEE SCHEDULE Motion was made by Commissioner Carey, seconded by Chair Willhoit to table the proposed amendments to the Inspection Fee Schedule. VOTE: AYES, 2; NOES, 2 (Commissioners Lloyd and Walker) Motion was made by Commissioner Carey, seconded by Chair Willhoit to approve the proposed amendments to the Inspection Fee Schedule with the exception of those fees for campaign signs. VOTE: AYES, 2; NOES, 2 (Commissioners Lloyd and Walker) 4. PARTIAL WIDTH R W - EVELYN TERRELL MINOR SUBDIVISION Director of Planning Marvin Collins presented for consideration of approval a request for a partial width right-of-way of 30 feet to serve the Evelyn Terrell minor subdivision. The Planning Board recommended approval of the partial width right-of-way of 30 feet. Motion was made by Commissioner Carey, seconded by Chair Willhoit to approve the Planning Board recommendation. VOTE: UNANIMOUS. 5. PARTIAL WIDTH R/W - JACK GATES SUBDIVISION ~- Marvin Collins presented for consideration of approval a request for a partial width right-of-way of 40 feet for a distance of approximately 1,230 feet to serve a one lot minor subdivision located in the Shirley Gentry Subdivision. It is understood that, if a partial width right-of-way is approved, Mr. Gates will apply for a major subdivision of his property to create a lot for each of his three daughters. The Planning Board recommended approval as a Class Broad in a 40' partial width right-of-way. Motion was made by Commissioner Walker, seconded by Commissioner Lloyd to approve the Planning Board recommendation. ~~~ VOTE: UNANIMOUS. 6. CREEK SIDE SUBDIVISION PRELIMINARY PLAN Marvin Collins presented for consideration of approval a._,,~ Preliminary plan for Creek Side Subdivision. The property is located on Harmony Church Road (SR X1341) in Cheeks Township. Two lots are proposed out of 12.92 acres. The property is zoned Agricultural Residential and designated. Agricultural Residential in the Land Use Plan. The Planning Board recommended approval of the Preliminary Plan with the condition that a revised Preliminary Pian be submitted showing setbacks and required landscaping. Motion was made by Commissioner walker, seconded by Commissioner Lloyd to approve the Planning Board recommendation. VOTE: UNANIMOUS. 7. MEL-OAK ESTATES PHASE 4 - PRELIMINARY PLAN Marvin Collins presented for consideration of approval a preliminary plan for the Mel-Oak Estates Phase 4 Subdivision. The property is located in Chapel Hill Township. Six lots are proposed, each approximately 40,000 square feet. The property is. located in the Rural Buffer which presently requires a two acre minimum lot size. The developer is requesting approval of the six-lot design since Mel~Oaks has been an on-going subdivision. The 8.3 acre tract is zoned R-1 and located in the University Lake Watershed. The Planning Board recommended approval of the proposed six-lot subdivision because they felt that phase 4 was a continuation of a previous subdivision and to require two acre lots at this time would create an inconsistency within that development. Collins made reference to the policy adopted by the Board on October 3 and indicated that the Planning Board suggested that the Board -; alter the policy to allow for any phased development that had been planned in phases to be completed under the old standard of one acre lot size. This would insure consistency within those developments. The Planning'`'=-~~ Board recommended approval with the attachment of four conditions. After ensued discussion, it was decided that the policy would be revised to include those phased developments which have received in part preliminary plan approval -that are phased and at least one phase has received preliminary plat approval and where the sketch plan has been approved for the entire project. A revised policy will be presented at the November 18 meeting. This item was postponed until November 18. 8. HOMESTEAD HILLS: PHASE II PRELIMINARY PLAN Marvin Collins presented for consideration of approval the Preliminary Plan for Homestead Hills Subdivision - Phase II. The property is located in Chapel Hill Township on the north side of Homestead Road (SR 1777). The tract is bordered by residential development and proposed recreational property owned by Orange County. Eleven lots are proposed out of 12.23 acres. The zoning of the property is R-1 .and the Land Use Plan designation is Suburban Residential. The Planning Board recommended approval of the Preliminary Plan contingent upon the following conditions: (1) Indicate that this is "Phase II" of Homestead Hills Subdivision. (2) Revise plans to provide radius (220') in second curve as recommended by NCDOT. (3) Provide dedication of additional five (5) feet of right-of-way from Lot 1. Carrboro recommended 20 feet to dedicate half of a 100-foot right-of-way. The Chapel Hill-Carrboro Thoroughfare Plan designated Homestead Road as a minor thoroughfare (collector street). Orange County requires a 70- foot right-of-way for collector streets or five (5) additional ~~ feet on both sides of an existing sixty-foot right-of-way. (4) Payment in lieu of dedication ($2455) or dedicate 13,690 square feet of land to Orange County for expansion of Homestead Community Building property. Requirement is based on 1/35th of an acre per dwelling una.t or lot. Recreation Department has .indicated desirability of 34-foot wide strip from Lots 6 and 7. A strip of that width would reduce area of Lot 6 to 35,505 sq.ft., making it conforming. Given the circumstances if dedication is prova~ded, the applicant is given an option. (5) That a landscaping plan be submitted, showing trees to be preserved upon project completion, specifying their location and approximate size. Plans shall be prepared and trees preserved in accordance with Section IV-B-8 of the Subdivision Regulations. (6) Provide a 30' easement/pedestrian walkway so that residents of the subdivision can walk to the public recreation area from the cul-de-sac without having to walk along Homestead Road (SR 1777) as recommended by the Recreation Department. Motion was made by Commissioner Lloyd, seconded by Commissioner Walker to approve the Planning Board recommendation and the recommended conditions. VOTE: UNANIMOUS. 9. Z-7-86_(REZONING REOUEST) ALLEN AND DORIS TURNER Marvin Collins presented for consideration of approval a rezoning request submitted by Allen and Doris Turner of a 14.97 acre tract located on a gravel access road partially maintained by NCDOT. The access road connects to U.S. 70 at the southwest intersection corner of U.S. 70 and I- 85 in Eno Township. The present zoning classification of the property is Rural Residential. The applicant is requesting the lot be rezoned to General Commercial-4. The Planning Board recommended denial with resubmission as a Planned Development. Motion was made by Commissioner Walker, seconded by Commissioner Lloyd to approve the request as submitted by the developer to rezone the lot to General Commercial-4. VOTE: AYES, 3; NOES, ~. (Commissioner Carey). 10. Z-8-86 R.B,_BARLOW, JR._AN_D ROBERT FAIRCLOTH Marvin Collins presented for consideration of approval a rezoning request from R. B. Barlow, Jr. and Robert Faircloth. Two lots are involved. Lot 10 is a vacant, wooded lot and zoned Existing Commercial (EC-5). Lot 11 contains five buildings and is presently zoned R-l. The Planning Board recommended approval of the rezoning for Lot l0 from EC-5 to R-1 and recommended that Lot 11 be left in an R-1 classification. Motion was made by Commissioner Lloyd, seconded by Commissioner Carey to approve the Planning Board recommendation. VOTE: UNANIMOUS. 11. LAND USE PLAN AMENDMENT - INVENTORY OF CULTURAL. HISTORICAL, RECREATIONI ._BEOLOGICAL AND GEOLOGICAL RESOURCES (Copy of the text amendments with the addition of the inventory as appendix to the Land Use Plan will be made part of the Orange County Land Use Plan located in the Clerk's office). Marvin Collins presented for consideration of approval proposed text amendments to the. land Use Plan which includes the inventory of cultural, historical, recreation, biological and geological resources inventory as appendix. Motion was made by Commissioner Carey, seconded by Chair Willhoit ~~ to approve the amendment to the text and the incorporation of the inventory as an appendix to the Land Use Plan. VOTE: UNANIMOUS. 12. PROPOSED SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS TEXT AMENDMENT Marvin Collins presented for consideration of approval the:. proposed text amendments to the Subdivision Regulations which will bring the County into conformance with the North Carolina uniform Plat Law. The Planning Board recommended approval of the amendment as follows: Section III - E 5 a Revised to read "Final plats shall be drawn in waterproof ink on satisfactory reproducible material on sheets no smaller than 8 1/_2" x 11" or cxreater gran 21" x 30" and must include mar ins of at least 1 1 2" on the left en .more tnan one requires .•• Motion was made by Commissioner Carey, seconded by Chair Willhoit to approve the Planning Board recommendation. VOTE: UNANIMOUS. 13 PLANNING BOARD/BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS MEETING Marvin presented for consideration a meeting date for the Planning Board to meet with the Board of Commissioners to review the status of the Planning Department's work program, discuss departmental organizational changes, and outline work program objectives for the 1987-88 fiscal year. It was the consensus of the Board that December 4 would be set for this meeting contingent upon the approval of Commissioner Marshall. 14. I-40 QUESTIONNAIRE After Tseveral concerns were raised by Chair Willhoit and --~ Commissioner Carey, motion was made by Commissioner Carey, seconded by. Chair Willhoit to table this item. VOTE: UNANIMOUS. 15. LEASE OF SPACE FOR DRIVER'S LICENSE OFFICE Questions were raised about the cost of utilities and the 5~ annual increase after two years. This item was postponed until the next meeting. 16. LEASE OF DUPLICATING E UIPMENT (Originally ztem Fl) Motion was made by Commissioner Carey, seconded by Chair willhait to approve the sixty-month lease with Xerox Corporation for one (1) Xerox 1090 copier machine, and authorize the Director of Purchasing to execute the Sales Agreement on behalf of the County. VOTE: UNANIMOUS. 17. ENFORCEMENT AGREEMENT - TOWN OF CHAPEL HILL SOIL EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL ORDINANCE (Originally Item F3) Motion was made by Commissioner Carey, seconded by Chair Willhoit to approve the enforcement agreement as corrected (paragraph 5) between the Town of Chapel Hill and Orange County permitting the Orange County Sedimentation and Erosion Control Officer to enforce the Chapel Hill ordinance within the Town limits, including portions located in Durham County and authorize the Chair to sign. VOTE: UNANIMOUS. H. APPOINTMENTS NURSING HOME COMMUNITY.ADVISORY COMMITTEE Motion was made by Commissioner Carey, seconded by Commissioner Lloyd to reappoint Lynn Bechard to this committee. eF~ilr~ VOTE: UNANIMOUS. HILLSBOROUGH BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT Motion was made by Commissioner Carey, seconded by Commissioner Lloyd to appoint Vance Spinks to this Soard. VOTE: UNANIMOUS. ORANGE COUNTY BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT Nomination of Everett Kennedy was made by Commissioner Lloyd. Nomination of Henry Crane was made by Chair Willhoit. NO VOTE WAS TAKEN. ORANGE COUNTY PLANNING BOARD Nomination of Larry Cole was made.by Commissioner Walker and seconded by Commissioner Lloyd. Nomination of Richard Bullock was made by Chair Willhoit. NO VOTE WAS TAKEN. I. ADJOURNMENT With no further items to come before the. Board, Chair Willhoit adjourned the meeting.. The next regular meeting will be held on Tuesday, November 18, 1986, 7:30 p.m. in the courtroom of the old Post Office, Chapel Hill, North Carolina. Don Willhoit, Chair Beverly A. Blythe, Clerk