Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutORD-2007-222 - Economic Development Districts Orange County Zoning Ordinance 6.29ORANGE COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS ACTION AGENDA ITEM ABSTRACT Meeting Date: November 19, 2007 Action Agenda Item No. _ SUBJECT: Economic Development Districts Orange County Zoning Ordinance Section 6.29 DEPARTMENT: Planning and Inspection PUBLIC HEARING: (Y /N) No Department ATTACHMENT(S): INFORMATION CONTACT: 1) PowerPoint Craig Benedict, Planning Director, 245 -2592 Willie Best, Interim Economic Development Director, 245 -2308 PURPOSE: To discuss possible amendments to the Economic Development District Manual and add performance criteria for retail establishments and other uses, including an amended review and approval process. In addition, a new threshold categorization classification of low - intensity non - residential use is possible. BACKGROUND: Economic Development District (EDD) land use designations were created in 1994. Subsequently, Orange County amended the Zoning Ordinance Article 6.29 to include `The Orange County Economic Development Districts Design Manual'. This document sets forth the description and intent of three economic development zones; ■ 1 -85 Buckhorn Road, ■ 1-40 10ld NC 86 (now known as the Hillsborough Area EDD) and the ■ 1 -85 /US Hwy 70 (now known as Eno Township EDD) SMALL AREA PLAN AND INFRASTRUCTURE ACTIVITY These areas are in varying degree of planning and infrastructure research, analysis and Small Area Plan Implementation. Portions of these areas have received or are in the process of receiving water and sewer infrastructure and therefore additional planning is underway to ensure compatible uses and a pattern of development that will support existing uses as well as future uses. Other planning efforts regarding these areas are the Efland- Mebane Small Area Plan Implementation Focus Group, Waterstone Area Planned Development and Eno EDD Task Force. REEVALUATION OF PERMITTED USES, PROCESSES, AND STANDARDS The manual and table employs different sets of approval processes, i.e. administrative, Class A or B Special Use Permit (SUP) or Planned Development (PD) rezoning. Although, this is a classic zoning mechanism that can be effective, other methods can be used to promote compatibility. In fact, the two other EDD zones used other methods such as placing compatible uses in a prescriptive large zone (either Primary or Secondary EDD) so the potentially conflicting land uses of retail and light industrial or residential would not occur. 2 Another method uses heightened performance standards such as is noted in the Design Manual to create better access, appropriate buffers and landscaping, and master planning to manage the patterns of development. Also, the scale and /or employment impact of a project can be considered. The ranges of uses are still generally allowed, but the process type promotes a certain generalized use category located in a particular zone. Since these different EDD zone types are being suggested to be intermixed, there is a different and higher level of performance standards and procedural scrutiny that is involved. A PowerPoint presentation will be provided at the meeting. FINANCIAL IMPACT: Existing planning staff will support the writing and implementation of the proposed ordinance. RECOMMENDATION(S): The Manager recommends that the Board: 1) Receive the presentation and provide comments and direction to staff; 2) Refer to Economic Development Commission and Planning Board for their participation in ordinance development; and 3) Direct staff to prepare amendments for the February 25, 2008 Quarterly Public Hearing. Economic Development Districl (EDD) Possible Amendments to Zoning Code Section 6.29 EDD Design Manual I. EDD Intent - (By Area Zone) II. Development Approval System III. Permitted Use Table (Future Work) and Associated Approval Processes I. Design and Application Standards Outline of Discussion Retail- Office - Service • More Cars, Less Trucks • More Internal Traffic Capture • Support for Nearby Job Centers • Better Transition to Lower Density • Higher value office is invested in an area where there is less potential of industrial. • Peak and Non -Peak Traffic Page I. Strategic Development Area Focus- EDD Intent 4 A. Retail - Office - Service 91 a v 1. Description 5 2. Intensity Level Categories 6 &7 B. Industrial - Manufacturing - Wholesaling- Distribution 1. Description 6 2. Intensity Levels g C. Mixed Use 10 II. Development Approval System 11 &12 III. Specific Permitted Use Table and Approval Processes n/a IV. Design and Application Standards 13 &14 Retail- Office - Service • More Cars, Less Trucks • More Internal Traffic Capture • Support for Nearby Job Centers • Better Transition to Lower Density • Higher value office is invested in an area where there is less potential of industrial. • Peak and Non -Peak Traffic Focus- EDD Intent • Focus certain development uses in areas best matched for its type attributes. • Focus means make process easier for a use in one area over another but allow in both if conditioned appropriately. • Target Preferred Businesses and Industries. Examples: • Industrial near rail and high power transmission lines. • Retail/Office near good customer and employee access and as a transition to lower intensity use. Primary ED Zoning Retail, Office, Service Category Systems (INTENSITY LEVEL THRESHOLDS) PRIMARY LEVEL SQUARE FOOTAGE ■ ED 1 < 5,000 sf ■ ED 2 5,000 - 20,000 sf ■ ED 3 > 20,000 sf 1 91 a v isr_U Focus- EDD Intent • Focus certain development uses in areas best matched for its type attributes. • Focus means make process easier for a use in one area over another but allow in both if conditioned appropriately. • Target Preferred Businesses and Industries. Examples: • Industrial near rail and high power transmission lines. • Retail/Office near good customer and employee access and as a transition to lower intensity use. Primary ED Zoning Retail, Office, Service Category Systems (INTENSITY LEVEL THRESHOLDS) PRIMARY LEVEL SQUARE FOOTAGE ■ ED 1 < 5,000 sf ■ ED 2 5,000 - 20,000 sf ■ ED 3 > 20,000 sf 1 Retail, Office, Service EMPLOYMENT BASIS ■ < 200 employees ■ 200+ employees BUILDING TYPES • Freestanding Building • Enclosed Mall • Drive -thru Restrictions Industrial, Manufacturing, Wholesaling, Distribution Intensity Levels PRIMARY LEVEL SQUARE FOOTAGE TOTAL ■ ED 5 < 50,000 sf ■ ED 6 50,000 - 100,000 sf ■ ED 7 > 100,000 sf I• Development Approval System Process X - Multi - Departmental EDD Staff Advisory Committee Employing Elements of Central Permitting System i.e. Permitted by Right staff B - Class B Special Use Permit (SUP) eon A - Class A Special Use Permit (SUP) Pe/Bocc Industrial /Manufacturing/ Wholesale Transportation/Utilities • High truck traffic • Rail Access • High Power Transmission Lines • Better access to US Hwy 70 Corridor or Interstate • Non -Peak Activity Traffic • Large Building Footprint Development Approval RUM_ Mixed Use PRIMARY /SECONDARY LEVEL ■ ED 4 V' ` 1. New Topic - More Discussion Necessary 2. Placeholder - 3. Could include medium -high density Sr residential and low- medium Won- t= residential. (Co-mingled in structure or separate Conditional Use Permit development parcels) Development Approval System Process 'D - Step I ... Planned Development/ PBIBOCC Conditional District Zoning (CDZ) Legislative Rezoning (Article 713) Step 2...Special Use Permit Class A Quasi-Judicial Concurrent :UD - Conditional Use District Rezoning PwBocc Site & Use Specific Plan (Article 7A) Legislative Conditional Use Permit start 2 In Design and Application Standards A. Smart Growth Site Design Attributes B. Master Planned Program (Similar to Planned Development) 1. Roadway System 2. Infrastructure 3. Environmental 4. Flexibility (Removes need for stringent Building /Site /Landscape Volume Ratios) Design and Apple Standards C. Architectural Design *Common Element D. Landscape Design •Xedscaping, Buffering E. Circulation and parking -Shared Parking Systems F. Service and Storage *Access and Screening G. Signs and Lighting -Economically Competitive 3 concerned about floating districts, She wants it to be clear about how this is different from spot zoning. Michael Harvey said that staff knows that the Board of County Commissioners needs time to review this. It is the goal to get it to the Board of County Commissioners as soon as possible. He said that he could accommodate the concern about the process. The process will be fairly consistent with the existing Class A Special Use Permit, review process. Chair Carey asked when language would be available to the County Commissioners and Michael Harvey said by the first of December. Planning Director Craig Benedict said that the reason they are proceeding with conditional uses is that when the rezoning occurs it is talking about' an exact proposal for a piece of property, versus a general use that could have 50 different uses. Conditional Use Districts are very specific to the parcel and what will be put there. 3., Economic Development Districts Orange County Zoning Ordinance Section 6.29 Craig Benedict made a PowerPoint presentation. He said that over the last two or three years, the County has had to help Hillsborough out in the joint areas to move forward with Hillsborough's Strategic Growth Plan. The Waterstone project was the product of two years of work with two County Commissioners and two Town Commissioners and modifying the existing economic development district booklet to make it more user - friendly. The County has proceeded on an as- needed basis to modify the EDD'. Presently, the County is working in Durham with the Eno EDD. It is time to look at all three EDDs together and try to make them somewhat consistent. He then made the powerpoint presentation given below. Economic Development Districts (EDD) Possible Amendments to Zoning Code Section 6.29 EDD Design Manual ■ EDD Intent — (By Area Zone) ■ Development Approval System ■ Permitted Use Table (Future Work) and Associated Approval Processes ■ Design and Application Standards EDD DISTRICTS (map) ■ Enclosed Mail ■ Drive-thru Restrictions Industrial /Manufacturing/ Wholesale Transportation/Utilities ■ High truck traffic ■ Rail Access ■ High Power Transmission Lines ■ Better access to US Hwy 70 Corridor or Interstate ■ Non-Peak Activity Traffic ■ Large Building Footprint Industrial, Manufacturing, Wholesaling, Distribution Intensity Levels PRIMARY LEVEL SQUARE FOOTAGE TOTAL ■ ED 5 < 50,000 sf ■ ED 6 50,000 — 100,000 sf ■ ED 7 > 100, 000 sf Mixed Use ■ New Topic — More Discussion Necessary Placeholder ■ Could include medium-high density residential and low-medium non-residential. (Co- mingled in structure or separate development parcels) Development Approval System X - Multi-Departmental EDD Staff Advisory Committee Employing Elements of Central Permitting System i.e. Permitted by Right staff B - Class ;B Special Use Permit (SUP) BOA A - Class A Special Use Permit (SUP) Planning Board/BOCC Development Approval System PD — Step 1-Planned Development / Planning Board/BOCC Conditional District Zoning (CDZ) Legislative Rezoning (Article 713) Step 2-Special Use Permit Class A Quasi-Judicial Concurrent CUD - Conditional Use District Rezoning Planning Board/BOCC Site & Use Specific Plan (Article 7A) Legislative Conditional Use Permit staff Craig Benedict agreed and said that the EDC is ready to move forward with making minor comprehensive and cohesive revisions by February, and anything else will be put in a report for some later date. 4. Report on Courtesy Review Craig Benedict said that this was requested by Jay Bryan of the Planning Board regarding how the courtesy review process is working with Chapel Hill and Carrboro. If there is an opportunity to have a more elaborate agreement with Hillsborough, then there is a question of what gaps can be closed. Planner Gene Bell showed a map that highlighted the courtesy review areas present with Chapel Hill, Carrboro, and Durham'. He presented relevant sections of the Joint Planning Agreement, as shown below. JOINT PLANNING AGREEMENT (Excerpts pertaining to Courtesy Review- other sections omitted) Section 1`.2 Definitions A. Joint Planning Area.. The area within the Rural Buffer and Transition Areas designated on the Joint Planning Area Land Use Map lying outside the extraterritorial planning jurisdiction of Chapel Hill and Carrboro F. Joint) Courtesy Review Area. A portion of the northern Rural Buffer Area bounded on the east by 1 -40 and shown as such on Exhibit A. 1. Development Permit. Major subdivision preliminary plat approval and any discretionary permit (whether called conditional or special use permit or some other term) issued by the Orange County Board of Commissioners, the Chapel Hill Town Council, or the Carrboro Board of Aldermen. Section 2.3 Permit Administration Within the Transition Area B. Whenever Chapel Hill or Carrboro receives an application fora development permit as defined in this Agreement relating to land within their respective portions of the Transition area, it shall forward copies of the application' to Orange County for review. The towns shall establish timetables to insure that Orange County has an opportunity to make recommendations regarding such applications within the framework' of the County's regularly scheduled meeting dates. To the extent possible, the timetables of the County and the towns shall provide for simultaneous review to expedite application processing; provided, however, the towns may not vote to issue or deny a permit until they have received the recommendations of Orange County or until the expiration of forty -five (45) days after Orange County has received the application, whichever comes first. Section 2.4 Permit Administration in the Rural Buffer B. Whenever Orange County receives an application for a development permit relating to land located within the CHJDA Rural Buffer or the Joint Courtesy Review Area, it shall forward copies of the application to Chapel' Hill for review. Similarly, whenever Orange County receives an application for development permit relating to land located within the CJDA Rural Buffer or the Joint Courtesy Review Area, it shall forward copies of the application to Carrboro for review. The County shall establish