Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes - 19840618~~~ I~I_ I_ N U T „~S 1 ORANGE COUNTY BOARD DF COMMISSIONERS Z2~L~~' -PAC.. L3~~ JUIQE 18, 1984 (Continuation of May 29, 1984 ,joint Public Hearing) The Orange County Board of Commissioners met in a joint public hearing on June 18, 1984 in the Commissioners Room, Orange County Courthouse, Hillsborough, North Carolina. Commissioners Present: Chair Don Willhoit, and Commissioners Lloyd, Marshall, Walker, and Tv'hitted. Planning Board tiembers Present: Chair Alice Gordon, and members Burnette, Greenberg, Kizer, Laszlo, Pearson, Pilkey, Shanklin, and Yatasz Staff Present: Collins, Smith, Coutu, Kirk, and Bradshaw C-1 -47~.,___8~51~~.T..L1~. 'L~4~i1_C4R~~~D' C-2 Z-5-B~~S~.'~ZONI~~ REQUEST ~ The presentation was given by .. Jeff Coutu. These agenda items were continued from the tfay 29, 1984 public hearing to receive additional staff and public input on a rezoning request by Wildwood Corporation to change 12 acres f rora Residential-1 to General Commercial-4 and to change 62 acres from Residential-1 to Industrial-2 on the east side of N.C. 86 adjacent to I-85, part of Lot 4, Tax Map 45, Hillsborough Township. The property is within the HB-4 Central Orange Node which is designated Commercial/Industrial Transition and a Ten Year transitional node. The proposed rezoning would allow commercial aru7 industrial development on the site. Paliouras Enterprises has requested that I5.0 acres of land be rezoned from CC-3 Community Cor~unercial and R-1 Residential to GC-9 General ' Commercial. The property is located on the west side of N.C. 86 in back of the present Chris' Restaurant (Truck Stop) site. The property is known as lot number 11A of Tax clap 45, Hillsborough Township. The site is located in the Commercial-Industrial Transition Activity Node, and the zoning category requested is one of six (6) commercial zoning districts permitted in such a node. The proposed rezoning would allow development of the Truck Stop which may include establishment of a motel as well as possible commercial truck sales. The Planning Department report identifies other impacts of the proposed rezoning. (see par,~~f these Minutes) Traffic information and projections were presented by Coutu (see pages of these Minutes). Chair Gordon inquired as to how high/low figures were obtained. Coutu clarified, indicating rough estimates. Willhoit suggested that the key was not knowing the specific uses. He felt it was --- incumbent upon the developer to indicate specific uses, the kind of traffic that would be generated and some suggestions as to how to handle the increase in traffic. Cyrus Hogue, representing Paliouras Enterprises, stated that since five acres of this property is already in use as the truck stop, that part of the traffic burden was already included in these figures. Cputu responded that the figures were based on the entire 15 acres being rezoned as GC-4. It may or may not be the same uses. Kizer inquired which level of service is the road. Coutu responded the Planning Research Board of DOT had indicated the upper level of Service C. 'r'hi ~ i.~ hptween C and D. ~~u z Walker noted it would still be considered a stable flow and Coutu responded yes. Same of the things they look at in terms of flow adjustment would be eliminating a left turn lane and lowering speed limits to accommodate capacity. harshall noted the traffic is at capacity already and that she, too, felt the burden should be on the developer to tell what uses Would be theca --- and how to manage the traffic increase. Kizer noted that with five acres of the Paliouras property already in use, the traffic contribution had been overestimated by 1/3. t~illhoit responded that the level of service was determined in 19x3 and it was not clear as to ..whether or not the truck stop was operating at the time these levels were determined. Walker asked if this meant we were going to gear our growth to road capacity. Willhoit responded it was inappropriate to give carte blanche approval of projects without this type of information. walker inquired what the penalty would be if the developer gave this information and it resulted in greater traffic generation than he had said it would. Whitted responded that the way to handle this was a Special Use Permit or planned development. This would show the specific use. • Walker felt it was unnecessary for the developer to provide the information. _.. Willhoit then reviewed a planned development versus a straight rezoning approach. He felt the Planning Board should specifically look at proposals to deterriine which approach is more appropziate. He continued that there _. were apparent concerns here given that this is one of Hillsborough's entranceways in a critical area, as opposed to an undeveloped area where a straight rezoning request could be received. He suggested that the Planning Board develop the criteria under which a Planned Development/Special Use Permit should be required, so that developers would know what to expect. James Rae Freeland, developer, stated that most industries do not v~ant to talk to developers until they have zoning. He noted further that he did not really understand the process or time frame. He felt this property was ideally located for industrial and commercial development. Marshall noted that the Land Use Plan clearly states what we expect to do on this property. She was concerned that there must be a means to be sure we are not creating problems. Freeland noted that he did not know what was going to be there yet so how could he do planned development. Whitted agreed with Marshall that the Land Use Plan did designate this area as an industrial node but traffic was a big concern. A great concern was the truck traffic. The County would be foolish to consider burdening this area with mare traffic until the road can be improved or we could know that industry would be going in that would generate little or no traffic at all. Marshall asked the developer to come in with a planned development showing how the traffic will be managed and how it will be laid out so it can be seen that something is not being created that simply will not work. Whitted inquried how this development could co-exist with access across from the truck stop. ~~L 3 Freeland stated that he intended to have 2 entrances, one at each end of the service road running parallel to 86. Whiffed noted that they could not judge by this because it needed to be an a site plan. Freeland asked if he needed a plan for the entire 40 acres and Whitted responded the need was for fhe portion showing how the traffic is going to be handled. Whitted and Marshall both agreed that the management of traffic was the main concern. Freeland asked if he had an industry intereted in four acres, would he have to show what he was going to do with the whole 60 acres? karshall noted that if he planned industry incrementally, there was the possibility of ending up with precluding further industry. She also noted that perhaps a lot of thoucht needed fo be put into the proposal. Freeland stated that he didn't know what to tell industry about what was available. This item was referred to the Planning Board for recommendation. Public EIearing adjourned at 8:00 p.m. Beverly Blythe, Clerk Joanna Aradshaw, Planning Secretary Don Willhoit, Chair APPROYID 7/2/84 ~~l S 03'i 1982 dVERg6E-ABLY TRdFFIG ~~"'' VOLUMES-(I Ss/NC 86) ~~ g~ ~cu~c~~aoT -~~.af~1~v~1~i. G ~~ ~ -S5 ~? ~ ORANGE COl7NTY PLANNIIV'G DEPARTIV~NT _ H'1TTSBOROIIGH IPORTS CAROLINA, $7275 - swq v a 1 ti ~ ~ u . 't-" W~~~~a T0: ORANGE COUNTY PLANNING BOARD FRDM: ORANGE COUNTY PLANNING STAFF DATE: May 14, 1984 RE: Z-5-84 paliouras Enterprises (REZDNING REQUEST) GENERAL INFORMATION Applicant: Paliouras Enterprises Route 3, Box 173 Hillsborough, N. C. 27278 LOCATION: ~At the interchange of Interstate 85 and NC 86 West side of NC 86 REQUESTED ACTION: Rezone from CC-3 Community Commercial and R-1 Residential to GC-4 General Commercial PURPOSE: To enable truck stop development which may include the establishing of a motel as well as possible commercial truck sales. LOT SIZE: 15.0 acres or 653,400 sq. ft. EXISTING LAND USE: Gas Station, Gene's Convenience Store, Truck Stop, Vacant SURROUNDING North - Hines Liner Lumber Co., Zoned I-2 Medium Industrial, LAND USE: Carolina Activities Antiques zoned GC-4 General Commercial, Esquire Health Parlor zoned GC-4 General Commercial, and Special Use Permit . South - `Existing and projected single-family residential development (Wildwood Subdivision zonerd R-4 and R-5 Residential, and Joppa Oaks Subdivision zoned R-2 Residential), single--family residences zoned R-1 Residential. piedmont Power Company zoned Planned Development Office/Institutional, Woods Brothers, Inc.: various commercial uses zoned GC-4 General Commercial and EC-5 Existing Commercial. ` ~L} 14 Page 2 Planning Board May 14, 1984 East - Asco (warehouse), Colonial Storage, and X10 Depot Convenience Store all zoned EC-5 Existing Commercial, Security Doar & Window Company zoned E-1 Existing Industrial, Orange Concrete Company zoned I-3 Heavy Industrial and Orange Mobile Home Court and single-family residences zoned R-1 Residential. s West - Vacant land zoned R-1 Residential LAND USE PLAN: The subject property is at the H8-4 Node, located at the inter- section of Interstate BS and NC 865. The plan category far this node is Commercial-Industrial Transition. The requested GC-4 district is one of six (6) commercial/office zoning designations allowed in a Commercial-Industrial Node, provided certain criteria are met. APPLICABLE REGULATTONS: Listed below is a comparison of uses permitted in the CC-3 Community Commercial, R-1 Residential and GC-4 General Commercial Districts. "'~" indicates a use permitted 'by right. "A" indicates a Special Use Permit is required from the Planning Board/Board of Commissioners. "B" indicates a Special Use Permit is required from the Board of Adjustment. "0" indicates the use is not permitted. PERMITTED USES CC-3 R-1 GC-4 Day Nursery, Daycare, Private Kindergarden * B Dwelling, Single Family * * 0 Dwelling, Two Family 0 Dwelling, Multiple Family * 0 0 Dwelling, Mobile Home 0 * 0 Family Care Home * i '~ * Group Care Facility B B 8 Rehabilative Care Facility * 0 * Hotels. Motels * D * Residential Hotel (fraternities, etc.) A p A temporary Mobile Home 0 B D Accessory. Uses * * * Airport, General Aviation 0 A 0 Botanical Gardens * '~ * Buildings, Portable B 8 B Bus Passenger Shelter * Bus Terminals & Garages 0 0 * Cemetery 0 B 0 Church * * * Community Center * B 0 Extraction of Earth Products 0 A A Governmental Protective Services * * * Land Fills (2 acres or ~+ore) 0 A 0 Land Fills (less than 2 acres) 0 B 0 Military Installations * 0 Parks, Public & Non-Profit * * * Parking as Principle Use, Surface or Structure * p ~ Public Utility Stations ~ Substations A A A Radio/TV Towers B B B ~~~ Schools, Elementary, Middle & Secondary Schools, Vocational Schools, Dance, Art ~ tdusic y Transmission Lines Universities, Colleges ~ Institutes Governmental Facilities Water/sewer Pump Stations Adult Uses Animal Hospitals, Veterinarians Assembly Facility Less than 300 Assembly Facility Greater than 300 Banks ~ Financial Institutions Beauty & Barber Shops Social Clubs & Lodgss Drive In Theatres Farm Equipment & Sales Funeral Homes Greenhouse (No On-Premise Sales) _ Greenhousa (On-Premise Sales} Health Services: Under 10,000 sq. ft. _ Health Services: Over 10,000 sq. ft. Hospitals ' Junkyards Kennels/Riding Stables Laundry & Dry Cleaning Services Libraries Motor Vehicle Maintsnance & Repair Motor Vehicle Sales & Rental Nightclubs 52B Offices & Personal Services $29 Offices & Personal Services S30 Offices ~. Personal Services Postal ~ Panel Delivery Services Printing ~ Lithography 534 Recreational Facilities 535 Recreational Facilities 536 Recreational Facilities Repair Service: Electronic ~ Appliance Research Facility Restaurants: Carry Out Restaurants: Drive In Restaurants: General 542 Retail Trade, Sales, etc_ 543 Retail Trade, Sales, etc. S44 Retail Trade, Sales, etc. 545 Retail Trade, Sales, etc. 546 Retail Trade, Sales, etc. -- 547 Retail Trade, Sales, etc. SEorage ~ Warehousing; Inside Building Waste Management Facility Wholesales Sales CC-3 0 B 0 ~. 0 0' ~r 0 0 0 6 ~r 0 ~r B ,r 0 0 May 14, 1984 GC-4 R-1 0 s A 0 ,~ ,~ A 8 ~r -~ ~r ~r ~- B ,r *-• a~ A 0 0 B +~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 ar 0 0 0 ,~ 2 ~ ~t Page 4 Planning Board May 14, 1984 pIMEN5I0NAL REQUIREMENTS -•- CC-3 R-1 GC-4 Minimum Lat Area Use 2,000 sq. ft. 40,000 sq. ft. 40,000 sq. ft. Minimum Lot Width 20 ft. 13D ft. 75 ft. Front Yard Setback y 50 ft. 40 ft. 35 ft. Side/Rear Yard Setback - 20 ft. Building Height 45 ft. 25 ft. 45 ft. Minimum Grass Land-Area .400 .058 .492 Maximum Floor Area Ratio .72 .84 .71 Required Minimum Open Space Ratio .26 _ .24 Required Minimum Landscape Ratio NOTE: Although not a planned development, the open space ratio and landscape ratio apply to GC-4. APPLICATION CRITERIA The purpose of the General Commercial IV (GC-4) District is to provide suitable situated and sized sites in Eno and Hillsborough Townhhips that allow a broad range of commercial, office and service uses. Performance standards will be used to insure the -- absence of adverse impacts beyond the zoning district boundary. Section 4.2.11 of the Zoning Ordinance states that the district designation will usuall ' "- be applied when the following conditions exist: 1. The site is within an area designated as either Commercial or Industrial Transition Activity Nodes, by the adopted Land Use Plan, in Eno or Hillsborough Townships. Staff Comment: As indicated previously, the site is at the I;B-4, Harman Youn~j node which is designated in the Drange County Land Use Plan as a Commercial- - Industrial Activity Node and is located in Hillsborough. - - 2. Water and sewer mains exist at the site or are to be made available as part of the development process or .the lot size for individual uses are appropriate to the method of water supply and sewage disposal. Staff Comment: Water service is provided by the Town aF Hillsborough. The developer proposes to obtain a right-vf-way from an access to the Hillsborough sewer. Prior to obtaining the Hillsborough sewer service any building will 6e on its own individual septic system as approved by the Orange County Health Department. 3. All property to be designated for new development under this classification shall have direct access to major collector streets, as desienated by the .adapted Land Use Plan. 5tafff Comment: The subject property is located at the HB-4 Activity Node. This node is focused on the interchange at the intersection of an interstate (I-85) and an arterial highway (NC 86). This sine is located and has direct access on the west side of an arterial (NC 86) as designated in the Land Use Plan. 2~?u An estimate of traffic generation is possible using data from the National ' ,_ Institute pf Traffic Engineers. If developed For commercial purposes, an estimated 6,480 vehicle trips per day would result (432 trips/acre). If developed far office purposes, an estimated 3,375 vehicle trips per day would result (225 trips/acre). The average traffic on. NC 86 was 6,DDD vehicles per day in 1982. The capacity level in 1982 was 9,500 per day. The site, if developed far commercial or office • purposes would increase traffic on NC 86 'beyond capacity levels (see 1982 traffic data diagram far I-85/NG 86). OTHER INFORMATION Fire protection far the property in question would be provided by the Orange Rural Fire Department, approximately 2.0 miles from the site and located within the Town of Hillsborough on Churton Street. Response time to the site would be approximately 3-4 minutes. Law enforcement protection would be provided by the Orange County 5heriff's Department. The site falls within Patrol Area 11 which is patrolled on a 24-hour basis, three shifts, one deputy per car. Application of the LUI, floor area, open space and landscape ratios indicates the following limitations for the development of the site: Acres 5 uare Feet Site Area 15 .00 653,400 Gross Land Area (1) 0.6t 67g,g72 Floor Area Limitation (2) 334,546 Open Space Required 3) 482,780 Landscaped Area Required (4) 163,193 Notes: (1) Computed by multiplying LUI (53) times road frontage ( t 500' ) and adding resulting 0.61 acres to site area.. (2) Grass land area times maximum floor area ratio (Q.492). (3) Gross land area times open space ratio (D.71). (4) Gross land area times landscape ratia.(.24). Open space includes primarily all land area not covered by buildings. It does - include off-street parking areas, landscaped areas, etc. Landscaped area can include lawns, trees and pedestrian paths but not parking areas.. Given the open space require- ment, a two-story building would have to be utilized if the maximum floor area ratio was to be attained. -