Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes - 19840402r'~ ~ ~. ~.~ 1 I~iINUTES OP,F,NGE COUI~aY BOARD OF COPIT~IISSIDNEfiS April 2, 1984 The Orange County Board of Commissioners met in regular session on April 2, 1984 at 7:30 p.m. in the Superior Courtroom, Orange County Courthouse, Hillsborough, North Carolina. Commissioners Present: bon FtiTillhoitr Chair, and Commissioners Ben Lloyd, Shirley t~'arshall, t.arman Walker and Richard t-7hitted. A - ~~8.~5911~IT~ Commissioner P7hitted requested adding to the agenda a report from Commissioner Lloyd on his n;eeting with the town of Mebane. (item fi19) Conunissioner )'.loyd added a report about the multi purpose center. (item ~2~) Iie also requested that item 7 Proposed West Orange Land Use Plan: Land Use Plan and Zoning Text Amendments; and Zoning of Cheeks Township - be removes from the agenda because he was absent from the meeting ir, which this item w«s added. Commissioner Y?illhoit e::plained this item was put on the Aiarch 5th agenda far discussion only because Commissioner Lloyd was out of town. T,9otion was made by Cammissianer Lloyd, seconded by Comr..issioner r•;alker that item 7 - Proposed T4est Crange Land Use Plan: Land Use Plan and Zor.ina Text Amendments; and Zoning of Cheeks Township be removed from the agenda.) VOTE; A1•es, 2; P:oes, 3 (r•7i11hoit, Ti7hitted and Tarshall) . B • &T)~~~~41'"fT3~i~ 1' ~~s~~].n~~~-Ace~da Chair S•~illhoit will recognize those who would like to speak on Zoning of Cheeks Township at the proper time although he pointed out that - the public hearing on this item was held on November 28, 1983. 2 • I<~DTOt op_~brr_~~~.Ilt~~.g~~~ Pir. Plartin, Town Commissioner for Hillsborough, requested adding to the agenda for discussion the animal control resolution the Board received from the town of Hillsborough. After discussion it was decided to add this item onto the April 17 agenda, at cvhich time the County Manager will give a report. C . ~F~ twiotion was made by Commissioner Marshall, seconded by Commissioner -.. Whitted to approve the June 7, 1983 minutes as circulated. VOTE: UT]ATd2T40US. potion was made by Commissioner 69hitted, seconded by Commissioner Marshall to approve the June 21, 1983 minutes as corrected. VOTE: Ayes, 3; Noes, 2 (Lloyd and t'?alker) . Commissioner Lloyd requested that an item be added to the agenda for a study to be done with regard to attorney fees. (item X21) T•otion tvas made by Commissioner Whitted, seCOnded by Commissioner Tarshall to approve the minttes of August 16th as circul«ted. VOTE : UNAT~ II90US . iKotion was made by Commissioner I•iarshall, secondeu by Commissioner Lloyd to approve the December 5, 1983 minutes as circulated. vnmF . r7raAr rr.~nrrs . ~~~ 2 I~IOtion was made by Commissioner j?bitted, seconded by Commissioner I•iarshall to approve the February 27, 1984 minutes as corrected. VOTE: UPdANII1OU5. D • APPO~~I~~~~ Commissioner t•?illhoit explained that most of the vacancies appear for the first time for information only. However, the Soard received from the -- tovan of Hillsborough a recommendation for the Economic Development - Commission far consideration. Motion was made by Cammiss.ioner Lloyd, seconded by Commissioner Ivhitted to approve the appointment of Paul Williams to the Economic Development Commission. VOTE: UNANIMOUS. E . T~EM~~QR_P~~.I~~I 1 • Pi~Q~Z~&~i~~~R9&1;~'_t)gt:37~tain ~8°fi.i;~s F~~~1~~1~1~h__-__ Choir hillhoit read the proclamation for the audience and commended the Happy Hearts 4-H Club for their effort in making everyone aware of Rocky Mountain Spotted Fever and the severity of the disease. i<iotion was made by Commissioner h'hitted, seconded by Commissioner t•Iarshall to approve the proclamation for Rocky Mountain Spotted Fever Pdeek. VOTE: UNANIMOUS. _ Evelyn Lloyd, Chair of the Health Board read the proclamation for Public Health Week and noted that an open house is set for Friday, April 13 -.. from 11:D0 to 1:30 at the Health Department. PIotion was made by Commissioner V7alker, seconded by Commissioner I4arshall to proclaim April 8-14 as Public Health Week in Orange County. VOTE: UNANIMOUS. 2. ~~Q1iQSJ.~_~.rani Ken Thompson, County Manager noted the grant is for • reimbursement in the amount of 5503 from the State for a clinic held throughout the state. r`_otion was made by Commissioner Walker, seconded by Commissioner Whitted to accept this grant from the State and authorize the Finance Director to sign accordingly. VOTE : UNANIMOUS . 3 • ~QSi~~-3oi],s+S~89Qf~Surye:v Thompson explained tvaa bids had been received for the survey of all county roofs and meetings held between the Board of Commissioners and the two school systems to review the bids. Bids were received from: (1) Stafford far 560,000; and (2) Law Engineering Testing Company for 516,000. Motion was made by Cammissioner Plarshall, seconded by Commissioner t4Yiitted to award the contract for the roof survey to Lava • Engineering Testing Company and authorized payment out of the capital fund which has an undesignated remaining balance of 522,500.00. VOTE: UNANIMOUS. 4. ~ ~_.=3~k~RQL~Q_$ecomm~ng~j~~ Thompson outlined the recommendations from the Ad Hoc School Capital Task Force to the Board of County Commissioners: 1. Raise annual General Fund appropriation for capital to 5750,000 per system. iii 3 2. Authorize a vote on a 8 to.9 million bone issue (7.8 million dollars in identified needs were presented in the report). 3. Implement, by resolution, the 1/2~ local option sales tax. ~. Dedicate 100 of the County's share of the 1/2~ sales tar. for school capital and school debt service, indefinitely. 5. Consider a supplemental county-wide tax `f or school capital. ti~7allace Harding, Finance Director, presented data on a 7.8 million bond issue and the accumulation of sales tax proceeds in a Capital Reserve fund and gave the advantages and disadvantages of both. (see the permanent files for a copy of this presentation). Commissioner t3hitted noted that the recorunendations from the P.d Hoc Capital Task Force were put on the agenda for discussion only in an y effort to understand all the ramifications that a decision on any one of the five recommendations will have on the other. In order to address all the needs of the schools, all five recommendations will be needed. A decision on the recommendation for the revenue from the sales tax to be used to retire the bond indebtedness will need to be made prior to the decision on the sales tax. If there is no bond issue then there would be no recommendation in terns of the sales tax. Commissioner ti•7alker stated that if the sales tax passes he would be in favor of a pay-as-you-go phased construction and an 80/20 split. He felt it unrealistic to plan for 20 years in advance because the needs will change in that time. Richard Sharpless, Chair of the Ad Hoc Committee acknowledged - that with the pay-as-you-go plan, the recommendations would simply have to be put off until money is available to pay far them. Commissioner Whitted indicated that with the passage of the sales tax, there ~~~ill stir be a need to increase the property taxes. Also, the sales tax recommendation made by Commissioner ti~7alker will not provide sufficient revenue to meet all the school needs, and county programs that were identified by the Task Force . Canunissioner Lloyd indicated the payback of a bond issue with -sales tax monies. would be expensive and make it impracticable. Commissioner E:arshall pointed out the complexities of this issue and the need for education dollars, for capital and other needs in the future. There is no way to determine if a bond issue cvould pass or nat. There are an enormous number of people very concerned about the needs of the schools but additional information is needed be r""ore presenting a referendum for the bond issue. Commissioner piarshall would support going to a referendum if a pacF:age was developed that could be promoted defining _.._ how each school system will use the money and specifically Stanbeck School. Additional revenue is needed and the 1/2 cent sales tax is the better way - to go at this time. Commissioner ti?hitted expressed concern that each recommendation from the Ad Hoc Capital deeds Task Force be addressed and a determination be made for each recommendation. 5 • L~Y~~F. `~1:~~~`~'x~&I,~-~LF-HALF $.~83~+~~.A~)~~~i Glotion was made by Commissioner 47alker, seconded by Commissioner Lloyd that the one-half ~ sales tax be levied with phased construction or pay-as-you-go with an 80/20 split for a period of 5-1/2 years. It was understood that with the above motion Con'saissioner ti•7alker eliminated any possibility of the bond issue. 15~ 4 Chair Willhoit agreed that the pay-as-you-go plan is attrGctive. However, the needs to be met need to be prioritized and steps of implementaiton for these immec,iate needs taken. Chair willhoit reiterated that the pay-as-you-go will yield eight and one half million after 5-1/2 years. He recommended lin}:ing the approval of the sales tax. with the committment nn the pay-as-you-go ar a bond issue.. Conunissioner Lloyd agreed that the school needs can not wait for S-1/2 years. Commissioner i4hitted indicated that tl~e motion for the passage of the sales tax is not flexible enough to address the needs as identified by the task force and expressed concerns of levying the tax by resolution. (1) By resolution the County will receive at this time 91~ of the proceeds. (2) The food tax is regressive; and (3) in municipalities where they operate water and sewer systems they would be mandated to spend.40y of the tax on water and sewer. That is not the case in the Orange County municipalities so the people must pay the 1/2 cent sales tax and also bear the full cost of water and sewer. Therefore, Commissioner Y7hitted did not support the motion for the these reasons stated above and because of the construction of the motion. Chair willhoit stated that the schools have significant needs and the county must make an effort to meet those needs. 6aithaut the sales tax, a property tax would be needed. He indicated he believed the sales tax would pass in a referendum and recommended to go ahead and pass it at this time. He felt the property tax would give the landowner a reason for raising the rent which would put the burden on. the low income and senior citizens. Commissioner ~?arshall expressed a desire to take the issue of the sales tax to the citizens of the County for their input and felt the advantages on the referendum outweigh doing it by resolution. Chair j^7illhoit noted that if the sales tax is not passed by resolution the municipalities would not be able to include the 1/2 cent sales tax in their budgets for 1984-SS. I•iotian was made by Commissioner tiYalker, seconded by Commissioner Lloyd for the adoption of the one-half ~ sales and use tax with 80/20 split with the pay-as-you-go plan. VOTE: Ayes 2; P7oes 3 (j~Tillhoit, Whitted, tarshall) Notion was made by Corunissioner Lloyd, seconded by Commissioner walker to adopt the one-half ~ sales and use tax with 80~ of the money going to school capital for a period of 5•-1/2 years to be effective on June 1, 1984. VOTE: Ayes 3; Noes 2 (Marshall, whitted). = Thompson reported that revisions have been made to the project .since the .February update; the next step is to contact the town of Hillsborough for a meeting. He requested a work session with the Board of Commissioners to hear and consider the revision. A meeting was scheduled for Pionday, April 9, 198# at 5:00. ~I+&I~? ~~BNA_.~QNTN~_ ~RbTNZ,t.•C~ TE~3~&~IyPN~LT,~ Z 1 N F 'Jj~1Sf;~,g Idarvir. Collins, Diretor of Planning, presentee information on the west Orange Land Use Plan (see (;~ in the permanent file for a copy of tha ZPPSt Or_cnae Land Use Plan). I)urina October and November three oublic • i~u 5 meetings were held for the purpose of identifying the area and e~:plaining the recommendation made by the staff. The proposal was reviewed ~s well as the alternatives. A public hearing coos held on November 28, 1983. No immediate action was taken pending a reservoir study indicating the reservoir sites in the upper Eno area and how they related to the land use plan. on Idarch 29, 1984, the Township advisory Council for Cheeks, Hillsborough and Eno township held a meeting. The Hillsborough Advisory - Council endorsed the findings and recommendations of the Planning Board with regard to the i~7est Orange area development standards. The Cheeks Advisory Council endorsed the resolutions they had made previously with regard to the G7est Orange Plan for Cheeks Township which included (1) positive recommendation for the extension of water and sewer throughout the T-85 and US 70 corridor; (2) the deletion oz the water critical area along 7-85 and US 70 connector and (3) a minimum lot size for Industrial use be reconsidered. They did not made a recommendation about the zoning of Cheeks. The Orange County Planning Board met on biarch 19, 1984. One major concern with regard to the reservoir study was the .time frame. They endorsed the Y2est Orange area study including the Seven t~,ile Creek reservoir study proposal and the water critical area. The seven mile creek reservoir site was the first priority. Collins entered into the record the resolution (~~_ in the resolution permanent file). Y,e pointed out that the water quality critical area as presented an November 28, 1983 used _ property lines for boundaries. These areas are now indicated by usin ridge lines. The Planning t3oard unanimously recommends to the Board of - Commissioners the adoption of the G7est Orange Study and Land Use Plan as .. presented at the November 28 public hearing with the revised designation of the water quality critical area in determining boundary lines. A proposal was made to add to the Ylest Orange Land Use Plan a new land use plan category for the water quality critical area. The description is as follows: Designate anew plan category, Water duality Critical Area, far the area adjacent to water supply inpoundrients to provide far more comprehensive development standards for .water quality protection than in less critical areas of the water supply watershed. The plan category is applied to land draining directly to existing or future water supply impoundments (Lake Sen Johnson, Corporation hake, proposed expansion of Cor~;oration Lake and proposed Seven Mile Creek) by overland flow and interflow, called shorelands and draining directly into the main channels of trunk streams emptying into the impoundments. The Planning Board unanimously supported (1) the land use plan category designation; (2) location criteria; and (3) land use goals and policies as presented at the November 28, 1983 meeting. Commissioner Lloyd requested the criteria for establishing the water quality critical lines. Collins explained that by using a topographic map, the proposed reservoir sites were drawn and identified by drawing a line along the ridge lines of those lands that would drain directly into the lake without doing through any tributaries. Going up the tributary to the first fork and back to the proposed impoundment identifying those lands that would drain directly into the main channels ~.~c and the lances draining directly ir_to the reservior constituter; the critical area. Con~rnissioner Lloyd requested the supporting data showing this is where the water critical area should be. Collins indicated several sources of documentation and research studies by the University of P7orth Carolina and other universities. Corvaissioner j~hitted indicated that Secretary Grimsley and now Secretar; Summers has convened a task force:, to convince local government officials to initiate a plan for the protection of water supply and watersheds. In the absence of local governments coming up with an acceptable plan, the state will be bound to take action because of the investment they have made in the Jordan, Falls and Neuse Lakes and the critical need for this water. He explained .that the identification o~ vrater quality critical areas addresses not only the different particles in the water but vrhat gets into the water, how it gets there and a way to provide same reasonable protection to keep it out. All Counties are faced with the protection of their watersheds. If it is not done locally, the state will do it. Commissioner Lloyd e::pressed disagreement with going into one township and determining the water cruality critical area without doing it county-wide to determine the full irnpact. He noted that with proper precautions there is na reason for industry not to locate within these watershed areas which would provide jobs and increase the tax base. Commissioner 6~dhitted explained the reason for not extending water '- or sewage is that it is not economically feasible unless you have development and if you have development you won't hive water quality. There is a need to have identified water quality critical areas with the appropriate tools in place to protect the water supply. Gordon Brown, a landowner and attorney representing landowners within the water quality critical area, referred to the ordinance in which all corunercial and industrial use will be prohibited and emphasized that with modern technology there is no reason to assume that Commercial and Industrial uses are always incompatible with good water quality care. Brown referred to his suggestion that a special use procedure be adopted to consiGer uses under certain conditions whereby each request can be _ considered fairly on a case by case basis and whereby the County can be 'selective. There are a number of uses in the -zoning ordinance that would not pose any threat to the water quality in Orange County. He questioned the definition of "commercial" and "industry" in the ordinance. He requested that words be clarified in the ordinance; that the.ardinarce is __, insufficient in its legal expression for its purpose and is too rigid in terms of the people issue and their constitutional rights. -•- Commissioner t~Thitted indicated that industrial development is only prohibited in the water quality critical areas and there is available land for economic development. This plan provides for the protection of the water supply and also provides land for economic development. Collins noted the special uses as contained in Article ~ - (See ~ ~"~ in the permanent file) Broom noted there is no provision for special use procedure under this ordinance and would not permit a major transmission line. Lindsey Efland, businessman and landowner, noted the process involving the advisory township council as outlined was not followed. A7sn. the water cuality critical area ciasianation should ne countywide. ~ ~:~~ 7 The audience indicated by a show of hands they would support reasonable zoning. Efland emphasized the people of Cheel:s Township are not against zoning, and proposed a committee be set up to work at resolving the impass and enhance communications. Commissioner Iti"hitted noted that time had been provided for ail questions to be answered and the proposed land use plan was reasonable. Bobby Nichols, farmer and landowner, questioned the use of the -- land owned by Duke University and was told that the area is designated as a public interest area which is more restricted than a water quality critical area. George Johnson, representative of the Hillsborough Economic Committee commented one the importance of proper zoning for economic development. He referred to the land in Cheeks township zoned Industrial and noted that 600 acres along the corridor is zoned agriculture. tie endorsed the special use permit concept. Chair 6•Fillhoit noted that prezoning would provide sites suitable and ready for industrial development but first a land use plan and zoning must be in place. Myron Martin, Hillsborough Planning Board T~tember, noted that on two occasions he had requested maps of the v?est Orange Land area from the Planning staff and received no response to his requests. }te emphasized a need for land. to be zoned industrial. Lillie Coble spoke opposing the zoning of Cheeks Township and the -. minimum lot size that can be purchased to build a house. Chair t•7illhoit pointed out that the coning will not prevent anyone from living on one acre -. of lane; that the Health Department controls the minimum size of the lot and zoning would not require a larger lot except in certain areas. Richard t2oore, Cheeks Township, spoke about economic development issues and a study of the southeast area of the country conducted by the N.C. Occupational. Safety and Health in which he sited four reasons for industry to move into a particular area. Tn all studies cuality of life was in the first 5 categories of the survey. In the top 10 categories of the survey was the quality of water supply. Economic Development is important. Bill Dorsett, Landowner and Chairman of the Cheel:s Advisory Council, expressed concern about the watez quality critical area being only mapped for a part of Cheeks Township, and expressed a desire that the people of Cheeks Township have more input into the decisions for Cheeks Township. Roy c4cAdoo indicated too much studying of the project was done with no final results. He is not against zoning that is fair and suitable for the people. Commissioner Lioyd pointed out the delay in the process because of the sewer line and felt no determination could be made on the land use plan until a location is determined for the sewer line and the reservoir. He referred to the February 20th minutes of the Planning Board which discussed Cheeks zoning and the water critical area and Dr. Ervin's proposal to proceed with the installation of a sewer line to the Efland Estates area znd the Efland Chee}:s School at a minimum cost and conduct further studies on the larger service basins after zoning is instituted and the land use plan adopted; thus correlating the zoning ordinance and land ~~i~. use lam with the 8 p provision of sewer. Commissioner Lloyd endorsed Lindsey Efland's proposal. Commissioner rarshall noted the Planning Board indicated they cannnot deal with sewer and water issues until the basic land use L~lan and zoning is in place. The land use plan may be amended if it does not work. Commissioner t•7hitted noted that the only difference between whet is proposed in Cheeks Township and what exists now in Chapel Hill. ii:ingham, Eno and Hillsborough Township is the water quality critical area and that will be extended to the other areas that have impoundments. The proposed _: map does provide industrial sites; addresses the five acre minimum lot size except in water cuality critical areas and input has been considered and where possible revisions have been implemented. Carl j7alters, member of the Orange County Planning Board pointed on the map to the 1.1 mile area between the railroad and z-S5 which is wasteland that with water and sewer has been designated as a workable area for the Econon•~ic Development Commission, and noted that the land use plan and zoning ordinance can be amended at a later date if necessary. iaoug Efland, owner of land in the water quality critical area noted that the industrial area will not be developed, overnight; that it is phase a or 5. notion was made by Commissioner Lloyd, seconded by Commissioner Walker that the ti~~est Orange sand Use Plan be tabled until the procedures that tar. Efland submitted are carried out. VOTE: Ayes 2; P1oes 3 (Carimissioners Willhoit, t9hitted and Marshall) t4otion was made by Commissioner tfhitted, seconded by Commissioner Marshall, to approve the Planning Board's recommendation for the approval of the West Orange Land Use Plan, including the text amendments. Chair T7illhoit pointed out that the current land use plan is not appropriate and is mat something the Planning Board can deal with in terms of sewer line extension. This proposed Y7est Orange plan will aadress the concerns for providing adequate space for industry and provide for the protection of the water supply that will provide for future growth. Tt provides a planning tool for dealing with these issues. Ed Copeland questioned changing or amending the Land Use Plan at a later date. He asked about the legalities that had beer, raised and the need for these to be corrected. He requested this land use plan be tabled until the legal questions ac,dressed. VOTE ON THE ~~TEST ORANGE LAND USE PLAN AND TEXT APdETdDA;ENTS: Ayes 3; Noes, 2 (Commissioners Lloyd and S•~alker) P•lotion was made by Commissioner Lloyd, seconded by Commissioner - walker for the zoning ordinance to be tabled until the procedure presented by hir. Efland is fallovred through. Commissioner Lloyd stated has opposition to the zoning until such time as the zoning is acceptable to the people of Cheeks Townshir. Lindsey Efland had proposed that a committee meet and work out a solution for the 4oning of Cheeks Township. Commissioner ~•7i11hoit reiterated the process and procedures followed for zoning issues and his concern far developing a process to get the input at the proper stage in the process. He agreed with the proposal i; the group would meet with the Planning Board and have the report given by the Planning Board. r ~~~ Commissioner Parshall indicated lookin at the 9 g process to be sure the work of the Planning fioard will not be brought to an absolute stop on the sewer line. Legally, the Planning Board must work in accordance with the general statutes Dr. Alice Gordon expressed no objection for the Commissioners to take whatever action they feel best but strongly objected to the creation of an Ad Hoc committee since there is a statuatory process in place. Conunissioner j~7illhoit stated that the consideration of the question of process could take place at the next meeting and criteria for _. the procedures to review the proposed coning of Cheeks Township. Commissioner Lloyd moved to table the motion until the cuestian of process is discussed. VOTE: Ayes, 3; Noes, 2 (Commissioners Marshall and ti~hitted) 8 • ~'S2D1~9 - ~;VELOPb1E~~ Collins presented information on a request from Hampton Dawns, Tnc. for a proposed planned development district designation for 29.7 acres of. land west af. N.C. Highway 86 and south of the southern Railroad. The Planning Board recommended denial because of the lack of compliance with the 100 foot setback requirer,.ent and the adverse effects of the access that the proposed traffic would generate by the development. Gledhill explained the special use process in that the County Commissioners must determine if the applicant has met the recuirements of the special use permit and if so issue the permit. The first step is a fact-finding process. Section 7.3 is a general purpose authority to make modifications in the requirements if you find that the public purposes are satisfied by the general requirements. tdotion was made by Commissioner t~ialker, seconded by Canunissioner Lloyd to approve the proposed planned development district designation for 29.7 acres of land cvest of N.C. Highway 86 and south of the Southern Railroad. • .notion was made by Commissioner ti•~hitted, seconded by Chair Willhoit, to table decision on this proposed planned development district. VOTE: Ayes, 3; Noes, 2 (Commissioners Lloyd and Walker) It was agreed that this item would be added to the special meeting agenda for ivionday, April 9, 1984. 9 . ~I'~. ~9~~SiBp~~~.~~I~.~_PIiBS~~ It was decided this item would be added to the agenda for the special meeting set for Monday, April 9, 1984. 11. kBNTH~8~9~7F~'~.P1iF tirraj~~y- P-LAN t•Iotion was made by Commissioner Whitted, seconded by Canunissioner _ t~tarshall to approve the Preliminary Plan surveyed for Orange County Board of Education located in Hillsborough Township on SR 1555 ( Miller Road) and proposed to be served by a private road, lot 2B on Tax I~~ap 6. The private road is to be constructed to Class S standards with a,50 foot right-of--way and a 12-foot roadway width. vOTE : vtaANTr•:ous . notion was made by Conu~issioner Lloyd, seconded by Commissioner G~lhitted to approve the Planning Board recommendation of the preliminary plan for Deer Pieadows located in Hillsborough Township on SR 1555 (Aiiller F.oad), ?ot 25 of tax raap 6, Slock A with the construction of a private road to Class C standards with turnaround and road name. Vf7TF e iiP'ATI7PinITF . X64 10 16. OI3ILD SUP~4~'_ BUDGET Janet Sparks, Child Support Enforcement, requested tentative approval of the 1984-85 child support budget (see #)~~-~S in th4 permanent file) . P4otion was made by Commissioner (•7hitted, seconded by Cammissioner rarshall to approve tentatively the 1984-85 Child Support budget. VOTE : UPIAT:ID9OUS . _ 10. TIR;BERI~~~Qjl~iT~ PLAN T~Iotion was made by Commissioner Lloyd, seconded by Commissioner F7alker to approve the Timberidge Court preliminary Plan - Phase IT located in Bingham Township east of SR 1102, lot 20A of Tax flap 28 subject to a note on the plat indicating that lots 5, 7 and 8 will use the mound system. Tdound system will be on lot 6. VOTE: UPIAT72i•i0U5. 13. ~~~~B`I~PS..~.-~I~~BI?~PI.~ Motion was made by Commissioner ~s'hitted, seconded by Commissioner [~Iarahall to approve the preliminary .plan for Alexander Pioods - Section twa located in Ena Township off University Station Road (SR 1712), lot 16, tax map 26 with a public road constructed to state standards. This approval is based on the following criteria: (1) the density would meet the reouirements for the state" except the road (two pauses per 1/10 of a mile). (2) possibilities for development along front portion of road _ (3) the subdivision is located just across SR 1712 from a 20 year transition classification ir_ the land use plan (4l the total subdivision contains 11 lots, including Alexander jaaods section one (5) property Lines should follow a 10' x 70' sight distance at the intersection of Myrtlewood Drive and University Station Road. VOTE : UNAT~ IT•ZOUS . 14 . ~~I~XN~_.~~~i~~~7D~Q~j~~_j~]Q~7COI~FOR I~ smY>;s Motion was made by Commissioner Marshall for approval of the proposed zoning ordinance text amendments -,,,qpArtiale 11 - D?onconformities as submitted by the Planning Board (see aQn the permanent file) Commissioner Lloyd requested this item be tabled for further study and consideration, seconded by Commissioner ~•7alker. VO^a E: Ayes, 4; Noes, 1 (Commissioner Parshall) 15. ROAD -&I~I~~~~ - CAt>.~S$~N~..$~aD hlotian was made by Commissioner Flhittec, seconded by Commissioner T+larshall for approval of the addition of Camp ground road to the State maintained road system. The road extends south from TdC 54 for 0.55 miles and is located 0.30 miles east of Plevie Road (SR1945). VOTE: UPIANIT•iOUS. 17 . I3A~L~Ir?~.B~~B~~b~~_~~~ b2otion was made by Commissioner 4ihitted, seconded by Commissioner rarshall for approval of two housing rehabilitation contracts: ~~ S~r~Pt ~~ntractor $j.~ _ mount 6 l 1 38 Torain Street Eugene Morrow S 900.00 110 Faucette Mill Road Frank Griffin & Assoc. 2$20.00 VOTE: UNANIMOUS. 1$. ~~F _PROPERTY Motion was made by Commissioner Whitted^ seconded by Commissioner Marshall to approve the assignment of bid made by Orange County to Wilbert J. McAdoo, Jr. upon payment by him of the purchase price an tract 402723, shown on tax map 10-A-7. w 19. BPPED__ITEM - REPORT_FR MEBANE Commissioner Whitted requested this item be carried forward to the next regular Board meeting. 20. ~p~~D ITEM - REPORT ON THE_~EI•~Nn MULTIPURPOSE CENTER Commissioner Lloyd was approached by the Center forftiwds to paint the Center. The estimated cost would be $2500. Thompson indicated that an appropriation is made to ,7000A for the upkeep of this facility and he would check with them to determine if an additional appropriation is needed to da the work. Commissioner Willhoit indicated he would take this matter up with ,7000A at their next meeting. 21. AbDED_ ITEM - • ~ Commissioner Whitted requested this item be carried forward to the next regular Board meeting. ADJOURNAIENT Motion was made by Commissioner i?hitted, seconded by Commissioner Marshall to adjourn the meeting. Don willhoit, Chair Beverly A. Blythe, Clerk At~ovsn 8/6/84