HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda - 06-01-2010 - 4dORANGE COUNTY
BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
ACTION AGENDA ITEM ABSTRACT
Meeting Date: June 1, 2010
Action Agenda
Item No._
-SUBJECT: Property Tax Refund Request
DEPARTMENT: Tax Administration PUBLIC HEARING: (Y /N) No
ATTACHMENT(S): INFORMATION CONTACT:
Jo Roberson, 245 -2727
Resolution
04/02/2010 Refund Request Letter
04/12/2010 Refund Denial Letter
PURPOSE: To consider adoption of a refund resolution related to one (1) request for property
tax refund.
BACKGROUND: The Tax Administration Office has received one (1) request from a taxpayer
for refund of property taxes paid in a prior fiscal year. North Carolina General Statute 105 -
381(b), "Action of Governing Body" provides that "upon receiving a taxpayer's written statement
of defense and request for release or refund, the governing body of the Taxing Unit shall within
90 days after receipt of such a request determine whether the taxpayer has a valid defense to
the tax imposed or any part thereof and shall either release or refund that portion of the amount
that is determined to be in excess of the correct liability or notify the taxpayer in writing that no
release or refund will be made ". North Carolina law allows the Board to approve property tax
refunds for the current and four previous fiscal years.
Under North Carolina General Statute 105 -380, "the governing body of a taxing jurisdiction is
prohibited from releasing, refunding, or compromising all or any portion of the taxes levied
against any property within its jurisdiction except as expressly provided ". Per the same statute,
any tax that has been refunded in violation of law may be recovered from any members of the
governing body who voted for the refund.
In this case, the taxpayer has requested a refund for tax years 2005 through 2009, but there is
no legal basis for granting a refund. In response to the taxpayer's inquiry, this property was re-
visited in 2010. After review, it was the appraiser's judgment that a reduction in value for the
current year was warranted.
Although the 2010 field review did result in a reduction in value, the General Statutes (GS 105-
381) very clearly define the standards for refunds. For a refund to be legal, the taxpayer must
demonstrate that there was (a) a tax imposed through clerical error; (b) an illegal tax; or (c) a
tax levied for an illegal purpose.
N
It is the Tax Administrator's recommendation that the requested refund be denied. This
recommendation is based on several statutory reasons. First, neither appraiser judgment nor
an error in measurement constitutes an illegal tax. The Tax Administration office has worked
closely with the County Attorney's office and specifically the Staff Attorney to define an illegal
tax. The area in question is the space above the garage. The County incorrectly assessed the
area as being finished. A field inspection verified that the area was not a finished space.
However, the space does exist and has not been taxed twice. By definition, an illegal tax is a
duplication of taxation, a situation where one is taxed twice for the same property. An example
of this would be where the same house is taxed on two different tracts of land when it only
existed on one tract. An illegal tax could also occur when the County appraiser mistakenly
appraises the home as having two floors when only one floor exists.
Second, appraiser judgment does not constitute a clerical error. Again, the Tax Administration
office has worked closely with the County Attorney's office to define a clerical error. By
definition, a clerical error is an error of transposition. For example, a clerical error would result
when the clerk is keying from the appraiser's property record card and the clerk enters "two
stories" when the appraiser indicated on the property record card that the house is a single
story. Another example might be when the appraiser indicates that the house was built in the
year 2000, but the clerk enters "2000" into the data entry area for fireplaces.
Finally, the taxpayer has been notified at least twice each of the years in which a refund is
requested as to the value of the property. There were opportunities to appeal the value each
year within the statutory deadlines. Also, there is no guarantee that the value would have been
changed in previous years had a timely appeal been made.
FINANCIAL IMPACT: Denial of this application for refund will result in no reduction in monies
from the County, municipalities, and special districts. However, approval of this request would
result in a reduction in monies from the County, municipalities and special districts for the total
of all refund years in the amount of $2,172.69.
RECOMMENDATION(S): The Manager recommends that the Board approve the attached
resolution denying one (1) property tax refund request in accordance with North Carolina
General Statute 105 -381.
NORTH CAROLINA " ' E's- a 0 to — 0+(0
ORANGE COUNTY
REFUND/RELEASE RESOLUTION (Denial)
Whereas, North Carolina General Statutes 105 -381 and/or 330.2(B) allows for the refund and/or
release of taxes when the Board of County Commissioners determines that a taxpayer applying for he
ref ind /release has a valid defense to the tax imposed; and
Whereas, the properties listed in each of the attached "Request for Property Tax Refund/Release"
has been taxed and the tax has been collected: and
Whereas, as to each of the properties listed in the Request for Property Tax Refund/Release, the
taxpayer has timely applied in writing for a refund of the tax imposed but has not presented a valid defense
to the tax imposed as indicated on the Request for Property Tax Refund/Release.
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF ORANGE COUNTY THAT the presented property tax refund(s) and
release(s)are denied.
Upon motion duly made and seconded, the foregoing resolution was passed by the following votes:
Ayes: Commissioners
Noes:
I, Donna Baker, Clerk to the Board of Commissioners for the County of Orange, North Carolina,
DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing has been carefully copied from the recorded minutes of the
Board of Commissioners for said County at a regular meeting of said Board held on
said record having been made in the Minute Book of the minutes of said Board,
and is a true copy of so much of said proceedings of said Board as relates in any way to the passage of the
resolution described in said proceedings.
WITNESS my hand and the corporate seal of said County, this day of
12010.
Clerk to the Board of Commissioners
C 4
04!02/2010
Guerry W. O'Briant
1615 Efland- Cedar Grove Road
Efland, N. C. 27243
Orange County Tax Assessor
P.O. Box 8181
Hillsborough, N. C. 27278
Re: Tract # 364257 Pin # 9545 -88 -6455
Att: Jo Roberson, Tax Collector -RMV
Dear Jo Roberson,
Last year when I received my property tax bill I called your Dept, to
review my accost with Tersea Moore and found out that since I moved in our
house in 2005 we have been charged for having a completed apartment over the
garage -
In 2004 when I was building these house and garage I was informed by
Orange County planning that the garage could not be habited after it had been
roughed in. I stopped all work on the apartment, since it could not be used Had I
been informed this from the start I could have saved myself money! However h
was still considered a bedroom when I went for a septic permit ??
I found this out and asked to have it corrected. Mr. Ray Jordan came out
and confizxmed that the apartment was not completed.
When your Dept did the tax appraisal in 2005 they were told by me that
the apartment was not going to be completed.
Ms. Moore told me to send a letter to you to be reimbursed for the tax I
had been over charged since 2005. Your prompt attention into this would be
appreciated
Also since the economy has taken such a down swing I would like to have
my whole place reappraised and ray property taxes adjusted-
Sincerely
Guezry W. O'biiant
05126/2010 16:05 9196443091
5
11 L
je!'C
ORANGE COUNTY TAX OFFICE
228 SOUTH CHURTON STREPT
P.O. BOX 8181
HILLSBOROUGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27278
TELEPRONE (9M2"100. FAX 6"3091
April 12, 2010
Guerry W O'Briant
16155 Efland Cedar Grove Rd
Efland, NC 27243
RE: Tract #364257 Refund ,Request
Dear Mr. O'Briant:
This letter is in reference to your correspondence received April 2, 2010 requesting a refund
of taxes paid for the 2009 and prior tax years.
North Carolina General Statute 105 -381 allows for the refund of taxes under very limited
circumstances. Since receiving your refund request we have tried to find a way to legally
honor your request. We keep ending up at the same conclusion that this situation falls
under a category that statutorily is not refundable. Instead, the proper step is to make the
correction for the current tax year and future years_ In accord with these conclusions, I am
enclosing a copy of your 2010 property record card to assist you in determining that you
are properly taxed now. Please review the property record card and let me laiow if there
are any further changes or questions. If it would be helpful, I will be glad to have an
appraiser meet with you at your home to go over everything and make certain everything is
correct.
We always endeavor to find a way to make refunds. Sometimes we are not successU,
Refunds have to be approved by the Board of County Commissioners, If the commissioners
were to make a refund not authorized by the statutes those commissioners individually
become personally liable for those improperly refunded fiords. Due to this liability we are
always careful and diligent in determining the legality of each refund request.
05/26/2010 16:05 9196443091 -- --
A
On the basis of our findings, a refund is not authorized under NC GS 105- 381and could not
be recommended to the county commissioners for approval. However, you do have thirty
(30) days to formally appeal the 2010 valuation as indicated on the enclosed property
record card. If you wish to appeal you should make written request to the Board of
Equalization and Review, PO Box 8 18 1, Hillsborough, NC 27278.
If I can provide any further explanation or assistance of any kind, please do not hesitate to
call.
Sincerely,
Judy Ryan
Deputy Assessor