HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes - 19830627 46I
�.xrr(1T�s
June 27, 1983
The Orange County Board of Commissioners met in a joint public hearin;
with the Orange County Planning Board on f.Ionday, June 27, 1983 at 7:30 P-ICI. in
the Superior Courtroom of the Orange County Courthouse, Hillsborough, North
Carolina.
Commissioners Present: Richard E. Whitted, Chair, and Commissioners Den
Lloyd, Shirley E. iiarshall, Forman Walker and Don Willhoit.
Planning Board Nembers Present: Dr. Logan Irvin, Chair, and I_embers
Steve Kizer, Frank Pearson, Sharlene Pilkey, Tom Bacon, Nancy Laszlo, and Carl
Walters.
A. ���?iIT77TS
There were no comments.
S. AUDIEI.0 COI1i-= jk
There were no comments.
2. Tl�ts_ R - on_ the_Prin � ragja�j
C. IC1y-C_AQT- J!rggent?�ti�II_�
Dallas Sanders was accompanied by John Watkins, Division Engineer and'
14ike 114ills, Highway "lairtenance Engineer. I•r. Sanders state& that the
secondary roads improvement program this year for Orange County is for
approximately $495,000 -- money generated from 1 3/8 cents of the state
gasoline ta::.
Mr. Watkins outlined two significant changes made in the rating syster..
for transportation: (1) criteria now gives six points per home. By giving more
points to each home the roads that have the greatest density will go up on the
priority list. (2) subdivisions now will be included in the rating. : r.
61atkins requested that the Board review the proposed changes and recommend ways
for allocating the monies. A complete list of the reconlimended changes was left
with the County Idanager.
The board of Transportation has again adopted 20% of the monies for paves:
road systems, 15% for spot improvements, and 65% for paved and unpaved roads.
He noted the anticipated secondary road allocations. (See pages ____of this
book) .Ir. Watkins commented or, Linden Road and its right-of-way problems --
there is no problem as 45,000 has been reserved from contingency for cost
overruns. (See Petition #2 in Clerk's -oermanent files) .
Commissioner Gihitted noted that this item will again be on the agenda for
August 5, 1983.
Because the Planning Board lacked a quorum, Iter.. D (Rezoning-James Rae
Freeland) was delayed.
E. 11nrificptienf_r3___C1 _ pgZT[titlT;isliLar._&irport (see
pages of this book)
John Northen, Attorney for the Developer, presented information on the
location of the maintenance hangars and the proposed uses to be contained
within.. Northen indicated the possibility of a fire access road through
leadowcrest and Headwaters Subdivisions to substitute for the Teer Road fire
access road, but added that the easements have not been obtained. He noted that
if easements through Ileadowcrest could not be obtained, the applicant would
like the request to delete the condition regarding a fire access off Teer Road
to stand. Yorthen noted that no evidence could be presented at this time
�,,,h,
46�
2
Commissioner Whitted responded that the evidence could not be accepted
after the close of the public hearing.
Attorney Geoffrey Gledhill indicated the Board could impose a condition
that the required easements be obtained.
Mr. Northen stated that the applicant would try to obtain the easement,
but, if unobtainable, desired the request to delete the condition regareins
fire access to be considered.
Planning Board t•lember Pilkey inquired about the width of the right-of-way
and if the travelway of the alternate fire access through rieadowcrest is paved.
Planning Department Staff responded 60 feet and unpaved.
Pilkey inquired what property owners would be involved. Northen
questioned the accuracy of displayed access map, but responded the developer of
the large lot subdivision. Fe added the fire access spur would split a lot an(i
that the developer - Just Us :Iortage Company, had retained ownership of the
lots. The Planning Staff indicated the airport site extended beyond that shown
on the display.
Planning Board 'ember I.izer asked the attorney if he was prepared to
provide information on the square footage of the uses. Attorney Northen
responded at issue was what the accessory Uses included in the development.
Kizer questioned the impact of accessory uses and indicated the Planning Board
did not have copies of the hangar accessory -uses diagram to speak, to. He asked
the size of the proposed hangars. Susan. Smith of the Planning Staff indicated
the approximate size of the har_gar is 16,000 square feet. I:izer asked how vany
hangars would be located on the site. Northen responded three (3) hangars.
Kizer inquired if the second floor would contain similar uses. Northen answered
possibly, but that the issue was the type of uses, not their location. I,iser
asked if a branch banking facility was included. Northen responded if the
Board of Commissioners considered it an accessory use. He felt the accessory
use issue was critical as there is a big difference between a use incidental to
an airport and a large use not usually associated with a small airport.
There were no audience con-aaents.
Commissioner vThitted asked if the Board wished to adjourn the public
hearing until August 1, 1583, to receive the Planning Board recommendation.
Commissioner I•iarshall moved, seconded by Commissioner Lloyd to adjourn
the public hearing. The vote was unanimous.
The Board continued the regular meeting. Following a break at 8:40, and
the arrival of Carl Walters, the necessary Planning Board member to make a
quorum, the Board reconvened the joint Public Hearing to discuss Agenda Item D
Rezoning - James Rae Freeland.
D. R�ninS�n�� Fs���ad
Ilarvin Collins, Planning Director, made the following presentation: kr.
James Rae Freeland is requesting that the zoning be changed on 35.11 acres of
property located south of I-85 on the west side of N.C. Highway 86. The
property is shown as a portion of lot 4 on Tax Map 45-Hillsborough Township.
He noted the zoning is Rural Residential (R-1) which would allow one (1)
residential dwelling unit per acre.
The requested zoning is High Intensity Residential (R-5) which would
allow up to five (5) dwelling units per acre with a minimum lot size
reruirement of 7,500 square feet. Development of the tract at such densities
could result in as many as 163 lots.
Property to the north is zoned R-1 Residential and contains scattered
single-family homes. To the south is a 10-acre tract zoned R-4 Residential and
4bt!
3
under-development as a single-faa:ily subdivision. Property to the east is
zoned R-2 Residential and consists primarily of the Joppa Oaks Subdivision.
Land to the west is vacant and zoned R-1 Residential.
The Land Use Plan 6esignation .for the property was changed on Narch 7,
1983 from 20-Year Transition and Rural Residential to 10-Year Transition. The
change was made in conjunction with a rezoning request for an R-4 designation
on an adjacent 10-acre tract to the south presently called Wildwood Phase I.
The intent of the-R-5 district is to provide locations for high intensity
residential development and supporting recreational, community, service or
educational uses in areas where the full range of urban services are available.
it is further intended that the R-S district be used to promote
economically-mixed housing and to contribute to the provision of a range of
housing types for lower-income households.
The zoning Ordinance states that this district will usually be applied
cohere the following conditions exist:
(1) The area is designated by the adopted Land Use Plan as a Transition
Area which can reasonably be annexed by a municipality ii- the ensuing
10-20 years.
(2) Water and sewer lines should exist at the site or be assured of
installation as part of the development process.
(3) Vehicular access must consist of direct access to a street classified
as either arterial or collector as designated by the adopted Land Use
Plan.
(4•) The full range of urban services exist or are proposed at the time of
the development including fire, police, recreation, education,
commercial and cultural activities.
t1r. Collins continued, as indicated previously, the property in cuestion
has been designated as 10-Year Transition on the Land Use Plan by action of the
County Commissioners in March, 1983.
The property has good access to N.C. Highway 86, a route which has been.
designated as an "arterial" in the Land Use Plan. However, road improvements
may be necessary due to proposed development in the area to accommodate
additional turning movements and allow for smooth traffic flow. The question
of these improvements can be addressed during the subdivision approval rrocess.
Water and sewer lines are being extended to serve the property as part of
the development of an adjacent le-acre tract to the south. These lines would
be connected to the Town of Hillsborough's water and sewer system.
Police and fire protection would be provided by the Orange County Sheriff's
Department and the Orange Rural Fire District respectively.
One question to be resolved is the ability of the existing school system, to
provide adequate educational space for new children. A redistricting plan for
the elementary schools has been completed and Grady-Brown Elementary appears
capable of handling approNimateiy 30 additional students. Stanback Niddle
School has one (1) vacant class (25 pupils) , but Stanford Jr. High and Orange
Sr. High are already at capacity.
Development of the property in question at R-5 densities could result in as
many as 163 new students (1 student per lot) . If apportioned to each school,
Grady-Brown Elementary, Stanford Jr. High and Orange Sr. High would require
subdivision of larger classrooms into smaller ones or, more likely, additional
classroom trailers.
One additional factor that comes into play regarding this request is the
Land Use _intensity System (LUI) . This system applies to L1 Planneu
nl T'a nbnPr nrnipci"Q lnr-at ari ir, Ti- R-P pn(1 T:-13 7oni.nc
464
districts. It applies in the latter situations because of the high-density
nature of such projects and sets standards for open space, recreation,
liveability, and building spacir-g. Preliminary indications are that the
requested rezoning and subsequent application of the LUI system will require
the developer to provide 1.2 acres of recreation area within the project.
Finally, the property in question is adjacent to an area known as the
Harmon-Young Activity Node. The Node is currently under study by the Planning
Staff.
John i.cAda,;.s, consulting engineer representing the developer, race a
presentation on the overall development of the lot and reviewed the water and
sewer service to the area from the Town of Hillsborough's system.
Commissioner T°7illhoit asked if a pump station was required. IicAcai,
responded that two pump stations were involved, one on site, and one north of
the site with a force main required to connect onto the existing Hillsborough
system. He also states: that the expected construction completion crate is
mid-July.
Commissioner Tlillhoit noted that the County helped to purchase the e--sting
line on US 707• partly as justification for attracting future industry. He also
asked if the buffer was missing along NC 86. Nr. -McAdams stated that he %;as
observing Wi?dwood Phase I. Commissioner Tlillhcit asked if a better buffer was
planned for Phase 11. 14c Adams noted that he comtemplated the use of a similar
buffer.
Commissioner Tiillboit inquired about access to NC 86. NcMams stated that
access would be through Wildwood Phases I and II, and no lots would access
directly on NC 86.
Kr. Collins noted that recreational facilities are required in R-5 zoning
areas.
Planning Board I•Iember Pilkey asked how many taxpayers would indirectly fund
the project, but not benefit from the water and sewer lines. I•ir. el lams
responded that the Town would recognize sewer revenues far in excess to address
"fairness" issues. He noted the Town of Hillsborough was supplying the labor
and the developer the materials as part of the negotiated agreement. He also
stated that the Town wanted a line sized far in excess of that needed to serve
the development and wanted to avoid a payback agreement to the developer by
sharing the costs up front. He noted there was a 12 inch water line which
would enable the Town to create a loop system with Joppa Oaks.
Planning Boars: Chair Irvin expressed concern with the high density proposed
and asked what preparations were being made for stormwater management. I-icldams
responded these measures had not yet been designed.
Dr. Irvin inquired what land buffer would be established to protect the
residential development from fu-ture industrial development. Dir. McAdams
responded that the developer was uncertain if the industrial development would
be proposed as the Land Use Plan does not yet designate such uses in the area
and his client did not have strong feelings about it. He added that any buffer
would include setbacks, vegetation and visual screening, but noted it is a site
design not a rezoning consideration. Irvin noted that he did not feel a
railroad is a good buffer.
Planning Board -:ember Pilkey asked if the houses in the R--5 rezoning would
contain the sane footage as those in Wildwood Phase I and inquired if a. road
through the R-8 section would connect NC 86 and Old NC 86 making two access
roads onto ?IC 86. IicAdams responded that the houses would be 950 s(yua.re feet
and that a connecting roar: was not under his client's control. He added that
they had not yet consiCere6 if they would oppose extending the access roads to
the property line. Planning Board Hember Pilkey further clarified that there ,
would be two access roads onto I.0 86. Kr. McAdams was in agreement.
Ms. hazel Lunsford, resident of the area, e..nressed concerns about
increasing urbanization, the tax base, devaluation of property, high taxes,
neighborhood protection and loss of the area's identity. She acknowledged
other area residents in the audience. She continued, expressing concerns
regarding school redistricting and traffic, noting this was a high risk area
and suggesting the need to install traffic lights. M5. Lunsford noted she was
satisfied with well water, and did not want to be forced to pay a water
availability charge. She did not express opposition to sewer services. Other
areas of concern included, "dumping", lack of greenboxes, street access to the
site behind existing homes and the inability to obtain access via the purchase
of 2/10 of an acre from her neighbor which would result in the neighbor 's lot
being too small.
With no further comments from the audience, the public hearing was
adjourned.
F-1. pates processing CoDtractr�oro_ (see page of this book)
Commissioner 1arshall moved, seconded by Commissioner Willhoit to provide
data processing service to the Town of Carrboro. VOTE: Ayes, 5; Noes, 0.
F-2 Housi�c� rehabi ; �q�ytracts (see page of this book)
Commissioner Sihitted moved, seconded by Commissioner Willhoit to award two
Housing Rehabilitation Contracts. VOTE: Ayes, 5; Noes,. 0.
F-3 BuLZ2_t_Amendmei= (see page for these amendments)
Commissioner L•:illhoit moved, seconded by Commissioner Marshall to approve
the proposed budget amendments. VOTE: Ayes, 5; Noes, 0.
F-A CBTA - ZQ;_ cj Qrcinance Air;endment (see page _ for this
Project Ordinance Amendment) Commissioner Willhoit moved, seconded by
Commissioner Marshall to approve the project ordinance amenc:ment for the CETA
program. VOTE: Ayes, 5; Noes, 0.
tgxi? Pavj.nc�graject (see rage of this book)
Commissioner I.arshall. moved, seconded by Commissioner Willhoit to approve
Northside Drive (SR 1964) as a Participatory Paving Program project.
VOTE: Ayes, 5; Noes, 0.
F-6 12dai Services- Child Support (see page of this boot: for a
copy of this Cowiissioner Marshall moved, seconded by Commissioner Yaillhoit to
approve renewal of the contract for legal services for the County's Child
Support Enforcement Program. VOTE: Ayes, 5; Noes, 0.
F-7 yegal 2ocia qervines (see page for a copy of this
contract) Commissioner - illhoit moved, seconded by Commissioner
Narshall to approve renewal of contract for attorney representation for
Protective Services matters. VOTE: Ayes, 5; Noes, 0.
With no further business to come before the board the meeting was adjourned.
Richard E. Whitted, Chair
Beverly A. Blythe, Clerk
APPROVED 1/17/84
M .., 006#..
_2-
ORANGE COUNTY
PROPOSED 1982-1983 SECONDARY
s ROAD IKF OVEWMT PROGRAM
Map Priority _ SR Estimated:
:lo. No. No. Nam and DeacriPtion _Length cost-
Pavia& Unpaved Roads =
- - �a
3 1892 Seven Springs Road from US 70 to a Dead End 0.46 $27;000:0(
(P. 0. P.-Paving)
4 1605 Oak Snob Court from SR 1595 to a Dead End, 0.38 30,000:0(
(P. 0. P. Paving)
1
5 1964 Northside Road from SR 1919 to SR 1990 0.26 18,00 0(
(P. 0. P. Paving) sN
6 2013 System Streets in-Rangewood Subdivision, 1.04 55,000:01
2014
2015
2016
2017
7 1 1566 Linden Road from US' 70 to SA 1590 0.42 60,000.0
8 1574 John Watkins Road from SR 1548 to SR 1002 1.4 85,000.0
(Complete Funding)
Contingency to be-Used for Overruns, Additions $45,641.0
to System, Paving Rural Fire Department Drives,
aid Property Owner Participation
Note: If right of way is not available on the
above unpaved roads, the funds will be
programed on other roads in the order
of priority or applied on property owner
participation paving.
004
ORANGE COUNTY
PROPbSED 1983-1984 SECONDARY
ROAD IHMOVEIE'NT PROGRAM
• y
1983-1984• Secondary Allocation (Anticipated) $495,641.00
Map Priority SR. Estimated.
ITO. No. No. Name'and Description Length Cost
Paved Secondary Road_Imerovement
1 1919 Smith Level Road from SR 1962 to US 15-501 1.35 $74.000.00
Widen Four (4) Feet and Strengthen
2 1734, Erwin Road from US 15-501 to SR 1733 0.44 26,000.00
Widen Four (4) Feet and Strengthen.
Spot Stabilization of Unpaved Roads
SR 1550, SR 1712, SR 1575, SR 1131, SR_1531, $75,000.0[
SR 2001, SR 1525, SR 15331 SR 15359 SR 1519,
SR 1335, SR 1556, SR 1520, SR 1515, SR-1572,
SR 1569, SR 1130, SR 1955, SR 1127, SR 1135,
SR 1141, SR 1143, SR 1341, SR 1340, SR 1336,
SR 1113, SR 1115, SR 1175, SR 1950, SR 1114,
SR 1137, SR 1140, SR 1182, SR 1730, SR 1538,
SR 1540, SR 1541, SR 1516, SR 1548, SR 1508,
SR 1536, SR 1512,. SR 1544, SR 1351, SR 1366,
SR 1346, SR 1361, SR 1353, SR 1383
North d i.
• � tM¢ 1175 �y I � 9
1
O i Qy;� ;RU$ R0. --
\
ITTT
N
°""moo ;� FAMA
e. _
C M' f O
MAC �V�� ITyy i• _ -
� ``�• � t O ltd � FF1100mm`ry �?
N
---. � t /• � nos
. kC Sv
'1lte Cr i — y
1 ; ''►arm, � sa
X°� �'
�9 1 +w� 'a"" uC0.'[
CAM a= to
ra
W
M1/f1f �SW.�"Q
1005
SUlsm► S �D. 9 net t98q r
l JI
VQMC go RSr M.
Nnt
004 ai 1
y MAY
two
1 n�
-wry t i ryq� •y �" y�j Y
.........
F
/ t , .>~7
fJ a•ttlttp� �' /o r+ rw4 j �pti �h �- enui
i
P /. Jar �'
IM
Chatham °�. �. 9 j as
County
4 4 cum Hrritoge Hills j a malft a,man
ahcrny�
o�os� chrarq� Ao T o�os ws churc•h Ro�I
7,M( churn i3o qp�
SCALE:
o aaoo' a
V
4 b
.xz�. c�uti
c ~'y 01P
$Q12�7 CF CG[•�1TSaxa`1=�.� .1/s..SC7� ��°
:VIE June 27,. 1983
_
i
Subjec�,-: MODIFICATION of CLASS A SPECIAL USE PERMIT FOR A GENERAL AVIATION AIRPORT FOR
BUCK MOUNTAIN DEVELOPMENT COMPANY
� �I *'ems: PLannin
Eu1-11in Hearn I r:
AttzckLa=n-.(S)_ a) Maintenance Hangak QX=Uon C=tZ=t- Marvin Collins
Schematic;;b) See May 23, 1983 Public Heari = ate: 732-8181 Ext. 346
agenda packet.
IMMU -: Continuation of the May 23, 1983 Public Hearing to receive citizen input on
additional material submitted as part of the request to delete or modify.
three (3) conditions placed on the approval of the Class A Special Use Permit
granted Buck Mountain Development Corporation for a general aviation airport,
NEED: At the May'23, 1983 Public Hearing, the Board of County Commissioners malted to
continue the.public hearing on June 27.,• 1983 in order 'to .permit submittal of
additional information on specific accessory uses to the.airport facility and
the possible alternative fire access route through Meadowerest Subdivision.
• I
_ 1
o.
IMPACT: Submittal of the additional information will facilitate continued discussion and
public comment on the requested change to the Class A Special Use Permit,
specifically Condition #3 and the addition'of uses not documented on the site plan
approved through the Special Use Permit.
• i
I
t4"
1.
i
T
z
r,
C
x:76
NORTH CAROLINA
014
ORANGE COUNTY
AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT is entered into this day of , 1983 and by and
between the Town of Carrboro, a municipal .corporation ("'Phew own) and Orange
County,• a body politic and corporate ("The County").
WHEREAS, the County presently operates.and maintains a computer system
serving various County departments and agencies and wishes to, make its computer
operations and services available to the Town; and
WHEREAS, the Town desires to purchase certain necessary computer services i
from the County;
� I
NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and the mutual promises
set forth below, the parties agree that, for an.initial payment and a fixed . j
annual fee, the County shall provide 24-hour, 7 day a week computer services
to the Town, including equipment,.:hardware and software maintenance, required
operator training and software programs along with required communications linkage,
with the following terms, conditions, and specifications: ;
1, Subject to paragraphs two and eight, the County shall provide to the .
Town by July 1, 1983, the following required equipment;
- Aa 2 Prism II Word Processing terminals
B. 5 "Adds" Data,Processings Terminals
C. 1 150 LPM Line Printer
D. 2 4-Channel Multiplexers
E. 2 9600 Baud Modems
F. 2 Two-way automatic "Intelligent" Switches
G. 1 Manual 3-way Switch
H. 1 Manual.2-way Switch
I. 2 One Channel Modem (to Public Works Shop)
J: 1 300-500 wmp "Letter Quality" Printer
2. The County shall not be required to purchase more than $20,000 in
equipment to meet the requirements of paragraph one. Ownership of equipment
purchased pursuant-to this agreement shall remain in Orange County, However,
in the event less than $20,000 is expended to meet these requirements, the
initial payment (see paragraph 12) shall, be reduced by the difference between
$20,000 and the amount actually spent. The Town of Carrboro may provide addi-
tional funds for equipment cost exceeding $20,000 or have the option of deleting
certain equipment items except for Items D and E..
3. The County shall provide all equipment maintenance. The level of
maintenance shall be the same as that provided for other users of the Orange
County Data Processing System. The Town shall be responsible for repair of and
the cost of repair and replacement to and the cost of replacement to equipment
damaged by the Town's negligent or abusive use of the equipment.
4. The County shall not be liable for any and all damages incurred by
A the Town caused by interruption and/or delay of service from causes not under
its direct control. Causes of such interruption and/or delays may include but
is not limited to, telephone line failure, and equipment failure. However, the
County shall do all things reasonably expected to bring the service up to the
required level as soon as possible.after identification of the problem causing
the interruption and/or delay.
4,x1
UIU
5. The County shall provide the same "software" maintenance services as
provided other users of the Orange County Data Processing System,
6. The County shall make available to the Town all existing "software"
operational programs or new programs or re-programming that may become available
to other users of the Orange County Data Processing System. The County agrees
to make such "cosmetic" changes, as may be required to meet the particular needs,
of the-Town, such changes not to exceed.200 hours of programming. Additional
programming is to be charged to the Town,at'�a rate not to exceed $20 per hour.
The hourly charge may be adjusted at the end 'of each year of the agreement to
reflect increase in cost. This adjustment may not exceed 5% per year.
7. The County shall provide required operator training for each program
to be used by the Town.
8. The County shall provide necessary communication .linkage, including
linkages between the Town's.Publ.i.c Works garage located on Highway 54 at
Greensboro.Street and the Town Hall for one terminal and the required linkage
between Town Hall and the Central Processing unit facilities located in Hills-
borough for all equipment.
9.. The County shall provide all installation and have all equipment and
software programs operational with operator training complete by July 1, 1983,
unless the Town of Carrboro specifically waves some portion of this requirement.
In the event the system is not functional July 1, 1983, the County shall refund
a prorata share of the monthly cost based upon the number of working days in
the month the system was not functional.
10. Subsequent to initial.installation, -the County shall provide the Town
with -the same level of service, including user priorities as other users of the
Orange County Data Processing System.
11. The County shall provide a security system as a part of the software
programming that will permit the Town to assign user accessibility.
12. The County shall provide the same data security and retention of data
for the Town as provided for other users of the system, including daily "back-up"
and other routine security storage.
13. Subject to paragraph two, the Town shall make an initial payment to
Orange County of $8,500. This .payment'shall be made not later than July 1, 1983.
14. The Town shall make an annual payment to the County in the amount of
twelve thousand dollars. Such payment shall be made on July 1 , 1983 and on July
1 of 1984, 1985, and 1986.
15. This agreement shall begin July 1, 1983 and end June 30, 1987.
i
-,
....4 72
0.16
This agreement is executed in. duplicate originals the day and year first
written above.
TOWN OF CARRBORO ORANGE COUNTY
By: By;i and unter, own Manager char Witted, air
Orange County Board of Commissioners
Attest: Attest:
Sarah C. 1 Aamson, own C er a to e• ounty Comm�ss7aners
Provision for payment has been made by an
appropriation duly made or bonds. or notes ,
duly 'authorized, pursuant to the Local
Government Budget and Fiscal Control Act.
Don Casper, finance erector
i
i
I
i
,. 47Z �
° RESLTLTS OF BID OPENING
° APPLICATION NUMBER 63
04,INER- Samuel Jo
COST ESTIMATE: 6,438°00
ADDRESS: Hill Street
PERCENTAGE OF BID OVER 10.52 UNDER
CHECK ONE: JOB BID JOB NEGOTIATED
BID AMOUNT
COMPANY
1. Frank Griffin & Associates
Gates Construction 8,365.00
Z. �
Taylor Home Improvements 7,195.00
3. i
4.
5.
i
. i
Bids .opened by:
Robert Wilson
Time of Bid Opening:
i
F
Date of Bid Openin June 17, 1983
Witnessed by: Roxanne Warren
i
#3e3eie4e3estt3r3rie�k�c9e3c3r�*3e3r dc��3r�r3e de:k�ck�e3e 3e9e 3cde�cir�e3r9ejri:'c�tk�t-k�*ick�iraC��ric3c�s'k�3r:h�r�.tkt�ent*�k
Lowest Acceptable Bids
7,195.00
Negotiated Amount:
N/A
Taylor Home Improvement
Contractor:
NAME
1156 Fiske Street Durham N.C. 2 7
ADDRESS
688-3214 -
PHONE NUMBER
� I
Com,EENTS:
i
DXrE-
Submitted by: --
Bid Approved by:
Proceed Order: Issued Not issued
CO*,ANTS:
- 474F
f
RESULTS OF R:: u:E?tzhG
APPLICATION NUMBER 144
p:.�wR:• Caleb ��lo r
�1.JT DR SS
E : Harper Street
.COST ESTIMATE: 32
?ZRCENTAGE OF BID .OVER 1.14 UNDER
CHECK ONE: JOB BID M JOB NEGOTIATED r=
COKPANY BID_AMOUNT
1.
Frank Griffin &:Associates 9 485.0
7,681L 00
2. Gates Constri,Ctia j
3. Taylor Home Im rov m
6,395.00
i
4.
I
Bids opened by: Rn-ipct Wilson
Time of Bid Opening: 3:0 i
Date of Bid Opening June 17 1983
Witnessed by: Roxanne Warren
Lowest Acceptable Bid: 6,395.00
I
Negotiated Amount: NSA j
Contractor: Taylor Home Improvement
NAN,E
1156 Fiske Street, Durham, N.C. 27707
ADDRESS
688-3214
PHONE N"- ER JI
Co:n`[ENTS: Community Development's contribution towards the rehabilitation of
this dwelling unit will be $6,000.00.
I
Submitted by: DATE
I
Bid Approved by:
Proceed Order: Issued Not Issued Q
Cp:L`917iTS:
I
k
021 ,
i
I
Orange County
Proposed
r
1982 - 83 Budget Amendment
The 1982 - 83 Budget Ordinance of Orange County as adopted on June 22, 1982,
and subsequently amended, is hereby amended as follows:
GENERAL FUND:
a) Appropriation:
I
Sheriff $ 3,800.
Source:
Jail Fees - State Reimbursements $ 3,800.
To increase Sheriff's Board and Provisions account.
b) Appropriation: 1
t
Elections $ 6,500.
County Commissioners 5,000.
Source: i
Contingency $ 11,500. i
To cover under-budgeted items.
c) Appropriation:
Janus House $ 600.
i
f
Source:
Community Based Alternatives $ 600.
To accept additional year-end allocation.
I
i
Y.
A
Adopted this day of 1983.
[y
'm
47C . s
023
Orange County
Proposed
1982 - 83 Project Ordinance .
Amendment
The 1982 - 83 Project Ordinance of Orange County as adopted on September
27,. 1982 ., and subsequently amended, is hereby amended as follows:
CETA:
a) Source of Revenue:
CETA IV SYEP Grant $206,264.
Appropriation:
I
- CETA Admin Pool - .Personnel 16,852.
E - Operations 21012.
CETA IV SYEP - Participants - Personnel 150,174.
- Operations 3,893.
CETA IV SYEP - Service Staff - Personnel 32,202.
- Operations
1,131.
To accept CETA IV SYEP Grant.
b) Source of Revenue:
OPC Mental Health $ . 4,Q88.
Appropriation:
CETA - Willie M 4,088.
i
To accept contract entered between OPC Mental Health and Orange County
Employment and Training.
1
Adopted this day of , _ 9 .1983.
i OaZLZE CCU: 4 Tt Q24-
BaP00 (F Ca-21ISSza-NI—ERS Action lq�� i
- Acczc` F��:iay rya E,is•t•:>��:cz zt:�: iu-.ar~.��
rT?1G I)Z June 27, 1983
Subject: Participatory Paving Project
Planning PubU H -U19: YZS X no
At zchsr�rit:(5)= M fne ►�'_a' contact: Susan Smith •
1?Ictise iqumrbl -^x: 732-8181 Fact. 359•
°C1RP0�: Board approval of request that Northside Drive (SR 1964) be paved under the'
Orange County Participatory Paving Program.• j
s
NEM: Northside Drive is an unpaved'state-maintained road in Dogwood Acres which
intersects with Smith Level Road (SR 1919) at its western end and Carlton ,
Drive (SR 1990) 'at its eastern end. Both of the referenced roads are paved.
Northside Drive serves 23 residential lots. SY
TH IiE IV�,�,
- uNlv�es+w "W
WACT: Acceptance of the project into the Participato ving Program will provide
for improvement of the road during the 1983-84 Secondary Roads Improvement
y
program.
If accepted, Northside Drive will become project #3 on the Orange County .
Approved Projects list. The local share of the construction costs is
$5,440, bringing the total Program project funding requirements to
$35,414 to date.
I
- I
RECOMMENDATION: Acceptance of Northside Drive (SR 1964) as a Participatory Paving Program
project. "
- I
027
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA )
CONTRACT OF EMPLOYMENT
COUNTY OF ORANGE )
THIS CONTRACT made and entered into this the day of
,.1983, by and between Orange County, hereinafter
County, and Coleman, Bernholz, Dickerson, Bernholz, Gledhill and Hargrave,
hereinafter Attorneys.
� .WITNESSETH--
I
THAT WHEREAS, the County desires to employ Attorneys as its
x
counselors at law for.the County of Orange upon the following terms: !
1.. This Contract shall begin July 1, 1983 and unless sooner
terminated by 30 days' notice of either party shall exist and continue through .
I
June 30, 1984.
a
2. Attorneys, upon reasonable notice, -are to be available for ;
consultation, legal advice and for representation as requested by the Child
1
m
Support Enforcement Agency on all legal matters arising from the duties of
County under Sections 128 through 140 of Chapter 110 of the North Carolina
General Statutes and Title 42 of the United States Code, Sections 651 through
660 and the federal regulations lawfully promulgated pursuant thereto.
3. Recognizing that from time to time representation of County
by Attorneys may result in a conflict of interest for the Attorneys, it is
agreed that when such a conflict arises, the Attorneys may refer cases
requiring legal services to other lawyers in Orange County. Such referrals
shall be with the consent and approval of the County Manager. In all cases
of referrals, the attorney to which the case is referred shall be compensated
in the same manner as specified in paragraph 5 below, and shall keep an
itemized record of work performed County on a case-by-case basis, submitting
474..
028
a bill therefor showing a breakdown of services performed on a case-by-case
basis as specified in paragraph 5. In the event such an attorney is awarded
counsel fees by the Court in this regard, an accounting shall be made to
County in the same manner as provided for in paragraph 5 below.
4. Attorneys agree to comply with all the requirements of
Sections 128 through 140 of Chapter 110 of .the North Carolina General !
_ i
Statutes, Title 42 of the United States Code, Sections 651 through 660, and
s the regulations promulgated pursuant thereto .relating .to the performance of
5
program legal services including, but not limited to, maintaining such records !
� i
as are required by County, to make said reports available for federal or state
audit, if required, and to make financial, statistical, and program progress
reports as are required.
5. For their services under this contract, County agrees to pay
i
Attorneys Forty-Five and No/100 Dollars ($45.00) per.hour for each hour spent j
by them providing legal services under the Child Support Enforcement
Program. Suctr hourly rate shall encompass all expenses, including but not
a i
limited to, those for salary; supplies, office space, heating and maintenance
for office space, telephone service, long-distance telephone calls, and travel.
Attorneys are not to be reimbursed for any extraordinary expense incident to
i
performing the services included under this agreement; except, that County
agrees to pay all court costs and filing fees which are required to be paid in i
conjunction with services provided by the .attorneys under this agreement.
S. Attorneys further agree to attend at least one training session
I
on Child Support Enforcement per year conducted by the Child Support
Enforcement Agency. Reimbursement shall be made based upon the hourly
rate but not to exceed a maximum of $150.00 or such amount as set by the
029
State Child Support Enforcement Agency. Failure to attend one approved
workshop per year shall be construed as an indication that Attorneys do not
wish to continue providing services under this agreement.
IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, said parties.have executed this contract
in triplicate originals, one of which is to be retained by County, one of which
is to be retained by Attorneys, and one of which is to be filed with the Child
Support Enforcement Section, Division of Social1ft'vices of the Department of I
5 Human Resources, Raleigh, North Carolina.. .
COLEMAN, BERKHOLZ, DICKERSON,
BERNHOLZ,.GLEDHILL AND HARGRAVE
i
� BY
g
_ eof r e
ORANGE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
BY:
Richard E. Whitted
Chairman
= ATTEST: i
Y I
Paulette Pridgen-Pond
Clerk to the Board of Commissioners
This instrument has been +
preaudited in the manner required by the �
Local Government Budget and Fiscal Control Act.
I
Orange County Finance Officer
i
481
i.!34 l
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA '
COUNTY OF ORANGE
THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this the 1st day of July, 1983,
by and between NORTHEN & LITTLE, Orange County, North Carolina, a
partnership organized under the laws of the State of North Carolina engaging
in the practice of law, hereinafter referred to as ATTORNEYS, and ORANGE
COUNTY, hereinafter referred to as the COUNTY:
s
W I T N E S S E T H
WHEREAS the Orange County Department of Social Services (hereinafter
referred to as the DEPARTMENT) has need of special legal services, not
I
otherwise provided by County government agencies, in connection with its i
services to needy and dependent persons in Orange County, the administration
of its functions under the provisions of Article 8, Chapter 110 of the
General Statutes of North Carolina and other laws of the State and
representation of the DEPARTMENT, its caseworkers and employees before the
I
various courts and agencies of the State of North Carolina; and
WHEREAS, it is the desire of the COUNTY and ATTORNEYS to enter into a
_ I
contract, one with the other, for the purposes and considerations as set i
forth herein for a period of July 1, 1983 through June 30, 1984;
I
NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and mutual terms and
agreements hereinafter set forth, the COUNTY and ATTORNEYS do contract, each
I
with the other, as follows:
1. That ATTORNEYS shall perform such services and render such advice
i
to the DEPARTMENT on such occasions as shall be required by the Director of !
the DEPARTMENT and with the approval of said Director, employees and
caseworkers shall require the services of ATTORNEYS.
I
i
2. That ATTORNEYS shall be compensated for all services rendered in
connection with Paragraph No. 1 above based on an hourly rate for services
performed of Forty--Five Dollars ($45.00) per hour, such hours and amounts to i
be furnished to the County Finance Officer or his designate for payment. I
The ATTORNEYS shall also be•compensated for and reimbursed for the services
i
of clerks and legal assistants hired by them to assist them in the
performance of their duties to the DEPARTMENT, based on an hourly rate of
NORTHEN&LITTLE I
ATTORNETS AT LAW 6T. services performed of Ten Dollars ($10.00) per hour. The COUNTY shall be
4s1 W,FRANKLIN
CHAPEL HILL.N,C.$7514
responsible for all costs and expenses incurred in the performance of the
i
1
I
I
} r 48r I
-2-
services rendered the COUNTY pursuant to this Contract. All Costs and
expenses advanced by ATTORNEYS on behalf of COUNTY shall be reimbursed to
AT MINE YS.
3. That ATTORNEYS shall keep an itemized record of work performed
for the DEPARTMENT on a case-by-case basis and shall submit its bill
therefor showing a breakdown of those services performed and the cost.
4. That this Agreement shall exist and continue from July 1, 1983 to
and including June 30, 1984, unless sooner terminated by thirty (30) days
written notice to the other party.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the COUNTY and ATTORNEYS have hereunto signed
this Agreement in duplicate originals, one of which is retained by each
party hereto and either of which is sufficient as the original.
ORANGE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
By:, ,
RICHARD E. WHITTED Chair
Orange County Board
of Commissioners
Attest:
Sharon Allison
Acting Clerk of the Orange County !
Board of Commissioners
NORTHEN & LITTLE
Attorneys at Law
i
By:
ERSON LITTLE
i
This instrument has been preaudited in the manner required by the
i
Local Government Budget and Fiscal Control Act.
i
NoRTHEN eLITrLE WALLACE HARDING, Orange County Finance Officer
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
•at W.PRANRLIry ST.
CHAPEL HILL,N.C.27514
f
% 1