Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes - 19830627 46I �.xrr(1T�s June 27, 1983 The Orange County Board of Commissioners met in a joint public hearin; with the Orange County Planning Board on f.Ionday, June 27, 1983 at 7:30 P-ICI. in the Superior Courtroom of the Orange County Courthouse, Hillsborough, North Carolina. Commissioners Present: Richard E. Whitted, Chair, and Commissioners Den Lloyd, Shirley E. iiarshall, Forman Walker and Don Willhoit. Planning Board Nembers Present: Dr. Logan Irvin, Chair, and I_embers Steve Kizer, Frank Pearson, Sharlene Pilkey, Tom Bacon, Nancy Laszlo, and Carl Walters. A. ���?iIT77TS There were no comments. S. AUDIEI.0 COI1i-= jk There were no comments. 2. Tl�ts_ R - on_ the_Prin � ragja�j C. IC1y-C_AQT- J!rggent?�ti�II_� Dallas Sanders was accompanied by John Watkins, Division Engineer and' 14ike 114ills, Highway "lairtenance Engineer. I•r. Sanders state& that the secondary roads improvement program this year for Orange County is for approximately $495,000 -- money generated from 1 3/8 cents of the state gasoline ta::. Mr. Watkins outlined two significant changes made in the rating syster.. for transportation: (1) criteria now gives six points per home. By giving more points to each home the roads that have the greatest density will go up on the priority list. (2) subdivisions now will be included in the rating. : r. 61atkins requested that the Board review the proposed changes and recommend ways for allocating the monies. A complete list of the reconlimended changes was left with the County Idanager. The board of Transportation has again adopted 20% of the monies for paves: road systems, 15% for spot improvements, and 65% for paved and unpaved roads. He noted the anticipated secondary road allocations. (See pages ____of this book) .Ir. Watkins commented or, Linden Road and its right-of-way problems -- there is no problem as 45,000 has been reserved from contingency for cost overruns. (See Petition #2 in Clerk's -oermanent files) . Commissioner Gihitted noted that this item will again be on the agenda for August 5, 1983. Because the Planning Board lacked a quorum, Iter.. D (Rezoning-James Rae Freeland) was delayed. E. 11nrificptienf_r3___C1 _ pgZT[titlT;isliLar._&irport (see pages of this book) John Northen, Attorney for the Developer, presented information on the location of the maintenance hangars and the proposed uses to be contained within.. Northen indicated the possibility of a fire access road through leadowcrest and Headwaters Subdivisions to substitute for the Teer Road fire access road, but added that the easements have not been obtained. He noted that if easements through Ileadowcrest could not be obtained, the applicant would like the request to delete the condition regarding a fire access off Teer Road to stand. Yorthen noted that no evidence could be presented at this time �,,,h, 46� 2 Commissioner Whitted responded that the evidence could not be accepted after the close of the public hearing. Attorney Geoffrey Gledhill indicated the Board could impose a condition that the required easements be obtained. Mr. Northen stated that the applicant would try to obtain the easement, but, if unobtainable, desired the request to delete the condition regareins fire access to be considered. Planning Board t•lember Pilkey inquired about the width of the right-of-way and if the travelway of the alternate fire access through rieadowcrest is paved. Planning Department Staff responded 60 feet and unpaved. Pilkey inquired what property owners would be involved. Northen questioned the accuracy of displayed access map, but responded the developer of the large lot subdivision. Fe added the fire access spur would split a lot an(i that the developer - Just Us :Iortage Company, had retained ownership of the lots. The Planning Staff indicated the airport site extended beyond that shown on the display. Planning Board 'ember I.izer asked the attorney if he was prepared to provide information on the square footage of the uses. Attorney Northen responded at issue was what the accessory Uses included in the development. Kizer questioned the impact of accessory uses and indicated the Planning Board did not have copies of the hangar accessory -uses diagram to speak, to. He asked the size of the proposed hangars. Susan. Smith of the Planning Staff indicated the approximate size of the har_gar is 16,000 square feet. I:izer asked how vany hangars would be located on the site. Northen responded three (3) hangars. Kizer inquired if the second floor would contain similar uses. Northen answered possibly, but that the issue was the type of uses, not their location. I,iser asked if a branch banking facility was included. Northen responded if the Board of Commissioners considered it an accessory use. He felt the accessory use issue was critical as there is a big difference between a use incidental to an airport and a large use not usually associated with a small airport. There were no audience con-aaents. Commissioner vThitted asked if the Board wished to adjourn the public hearing until August 1, 1583, to receive the Planning Board recommendation. Commissioner I•iarshall moved, seconded by Commissioner Lloyd to adjourn the public hearing. The vote was unanimous. The Board continued the regular meeting. Following a break at 8:40, and the arrival of Carl Walters, the necessary Planning Board member to make a quorum, the Board reconvened the joint Public Hearing to discuss Agenda Item D Rezoning - James Rae Freeland. D. R�ninS�n�� Fs���ad Ilarvin Collins, Planning Director, made the following presentation: kr. James Rae Freeland is requesting that the zoning be changed on 35.11 acres of property located south of I-85 on the west side of N.C. Highway 86. The property is shown as a portion of lot 4 on Tax Map 45-Hillsborough Township. He noted the zoning is Rural Residential (R-1) which would allow one (1) residential dwelling unit per acre. The requested zoning is High Intensity Residential (R-5) which would allow up to five (5) dwelling units per acre with a minimum lot size reruirement of 7,500 square feet. Development of the tract at such densities could result in as many as 163 lots. Property to the north is zoned R-1 Residential and contains scattered single-family homes. To the south is a 10-acre tract zoned R-4 Residential and 4bt! 3 under-development as a single-faa:ily subdivision. Property to the east is zoned R-2 Residential and consists primarily of the Joppa Oaks Subdivision. Land to the west is vacant and zoned R-1 Residential. The Land Use Plan 6esignation .for the property was changed on Narch 7, 1983 from 20-Year Transition and Rural Residential to 10-Year Transition. The change was made in conjunction with a rezoning request for an R-4 designation on an adjacent 10-acre tract to the south presently called Wildwood Phase I. The intent of the-R-5 district is to provide locations for high intensity residential development and supporting recreational, community, service or educational uses in areas where the full range of urban services are available. it is further intended that the R-S district be used to promote economically-mixed housing and to contribute to the provision of a range of housing types for lower-income households. The zoning Ordinance states that this district will usually be applied cohere the following conditions exist: (1) The area is designated by the adopted Land Use Plan as a Transition Area which can reasonably be annexed by a municipality ii- the ensuing 10-20 years. (2) Water and sewer lines should exist at the site or be assured of installation as part of the development process. (3) Vehicular access must consist of direct access to a street classified as either arterial or collector as designated by the adopted Land Use Plan. (4•) The full range of urban services exist or are proposed at the time of the development including fire, police, recreation, education, commercial and cultural activities. t1r. Collins continued, as indicated previously, the property in cuestion has been designated as 10-Year Transition on the Land Use Plan by action of the County Commissioners in March, 1983. The property has good access to N.C. Highway 86, a route which has been. designated as an "arterial" in the Land Use Plan. However, road improvements may be necessary due to proposed development in the area to accommodate additional turning movements and allow for smooth traffic flow. The question of these improvements can be addressed during the subdivision approval rrocess. Water and sewer lines are being extended to serve the property as part of the development of an adjacent le-acre tract to the south. These lines would be connected to the Town of Hillsborough's water and sewer system. Police and fire protection would be provided by the Orange County Sheriff's Department and the Orange Rural Fire District respectively. One question to be resolved is the ability of the existing school system, to provide adequate educational space for new children. A redistricting plan for the elementary schools has been completed and Grady-Brown Elementary appears capable of handling approNimateiy 30 additional students. Stanback Niddle School has one (1) vacant class (25 pupils) , but Stanford Jr. High and Orange Sr. High are already at capacity. Development of the property in question at R-5 densities could result in as many as 163 new students (1 student per lot) . If apportioned to each school, Grady-Brown Elementary, Stanford Jr. High and Orange Sr. High would require subdivision of larger classrooms into smaller ones or, more likely, additional classroom trailers. One additional factor that comes into play regarding this request is the Land Use _intensity System (LUI) . This system applies to L1 Planneu nl T'a nbnPr nrnipci"Q lnr-at ari ir, Ti- R-P pn(1 T:-13 7oni.nc 464 districts. It applies in the latter situations because of the high-density nature of such projects and sets standards for open space, recreation, liveability, and building spacir-g. Preliminary indications are that the requested rezoning and subsequent application of the LUI system will require the developer to provide 1.2 acres of recreation area within the project. Finally, the property in question is adjacent to an area known as the Harmon-Young Activity Node. The Node is currently under study by the Planning Staff. John i.cAda,;.s, consulting engineer representing the developer, race a presentation on the overall development of the lot and reviewed the water and sewer service to the area from the Town of Hillsborough's system. Commissioner T°7illhoit asked if a pump station was required. IicAcai, responded that two pump stations were involved, one on site, and one north of the site with a force main required to connect onto the existing Hillsborough system. He also states: that the expected construction completion crate is mid-July. Commissioner Tlillhoit noted that the County helped to purchase the e--sting line on US 707• partly as justification for attracting future industry. He also asked if the buffer was missing along NC 86. Nr. -McAdams stated that he %;as observing Wi?dwood Phase I. Commissioner Tlillhcit asked if a better buffer was planned for Phase 11. 14c Adams noted that he comtemplated the use of a similar buffer. Commissioner Tiillboit inquired about access to NC 86. NcMams stated that access would be through Wildwood Phases I and II, and no lots would access directly on NC 86. Kr. Collins noted that recreational facilities are required in R-5 zoning areas. Planning Board I•Iember Pilkey asked how many taxpayers would indirectly fund the project, but not benefit from the water and sewer lines. I•ir. el lams responded that the Town would recognize sewer revenues far in excess to address "fairness" issues. He noted the Town of Hillsborough was supplying the labor and the developer the materials as part of the negotiated agreement. He also stated that the Town wanted a line sized far in excess of that needed to serve the development and wanted to avoid a payback agreement to the developer by sharing the costs up front. He noted there was a 12 inch water line which would enable the Town to create a loop system with Joppa Oaks. Planning Boars: Chair Irvin expressed concern with the high density proposed and asked what preparations were being made for stormwater management. I-icldams responded these measures had not yet been designed. Dr. Irvin inquired what land buffer would be established to protect the residential development from fu-ture industrial development. Dir. McAdams responded that the developer was uncertain if the industrial development would be proposed as the Land Use Plan does not yet designate such uses in the area and his client did not have strong feelings about it. He added that any buffer would include setbacks, vegetation and visual screening, but noted it is a site design not a rezoning consideration. Irvin noted that he did not feel a railroad is a good buffer. Planning Board -:ember Pilkey asked if the houses in the R--5 rezoning would contain the sane footage as those in Wildwood Phase I and inquired if a. road through the R-8 section would connect NC 86 and Old NC 86 making two access roads onto ?IC 86. IicAdams responded that the houses would be 950 s(yua.re feet and that a connecting roar: was not under his client's control. He added that they had not yet consiCere6 if they would oppose extending the access roads to the property line. Planning Board Hember Pilkey further clarified that there , would be two access roads onto I.0 86. Kr. McAdams was in agreement. Ms. hazel Lunsford, resident of the area, e..nressed concerns about increasing urbanization, the tax base, devaluation of property, high taxes, neighborhood protection and loss of the area's identity. She acknowledged other area residents in the audience. She continued, expressing concerns regarding school redistricting and traffic, noting this was a high risk area and suggesting the need to install traffic lights. M5. Lunsford noted she was satisfied with well water, and did not want to be forced to pay a water availability charge. She did not express opposition to sewer services. Other areas of concern included, "dumping", lack of greenboxes, street access to the site behind existing homes and the inability to obtain access via the purchase of 2/10 of an acre from her neighbor which would result in the neighbor 's lot being too small. With no further comments from the audience, the public hearing was adjourned. F-1. pates processing CoDtractr�oro_ (see page of this book) Commissioner 1arshall moved, seconded by Commissioner Willhoit to provide data processing service to the Town of Carrboro. VOTE: Ayes, 5; Noes, 0. F-2 Housi�c� rehabi ; �q�ytracts (see page of this book) Commissioner Sihitted moved, seconded by Commissioner Willhoit to award two Housing Rehabilitation Contracts. VOTE: Ayes, 5; Noes,. 0. F-3 BuLZ2_t_Amendmei= (see page for these amendments) Commissioner L•:illhoit moved, seconded by Commissioner Marshall to approve the proposed budget amendments. VOTE: Ayes, 5; Noes, 0. F-A CBTA - ZQ;_ cj Qrcinance Air;endment (see page _ for this Project Ordinance Amendment) Commissioner Willhoit moved, seconded by Commissioner Marshall to approve the project ordinance amenc:ment for the CETA program. VOTE: Ayes, 5; Noes, 0. tgxi? Pavj.nc�graject (see rage of this book) Commissioner I.arshall. moved, seconded by Commissioner Willhoit to approve Northside Drive (SR 1964) as a Participatory Paving Program project. VOTE: Ayes, 5; Noes, 0. F-6 12dai Services- Child Support (see page of this boot: for a copy of this Cowiissioner Marshall moved, seconded by Commissioner Yaillhoit to approve renewal of the contract for legal services for the County's Child Support Enforcement Program. VOTE: Ayes, 5; Noes, 0. F-7 yegal 2ocia qervines (see page for a copy of this contract) Commissioner - illhoit moved, seconded by Commissioner Narshall to approve renewal of contract for attorney representation for Protective Services matters. VOTE: Ayes, 5; Noes, 0. With no further business to come before the board the meeting was adjourned. Richard E. Whitted, Chair Beverly A. Blythe, Clerk APPROVED 1/17/84 M .., 006#.. _2- ORANGE COUNTY PROPOSED 1982-1983 SECONDARY s ROAD IKF OVEWMT PROGRAM Map Priority _ SR Estimated: :lo. No. No. Nam and DeacriPtion _Length cost- Pavia& Unpaved Roads = - - �a 3 1892 Seven Springs Road from US 70 to a Dead End 0.46 $27;000:0( (P. 0. P.-Paving) 4 1605 Oak Snob Court from SR 1595 to a Dead End, 0.38 30,000:0( (P. 0. P. Paving) 1 5 1964 Northside Road from SR 1919 to SR 1990 0.26 18,00 0( (P. 0. P. Paving) sN 6 2013 System Streets in-Rangewood Subdivision, 1.04 55,000:01 2014 2015 2016 2017 7 1 1566 Linden Road from US' 70 to SA 1590 0.42 60,000.0 8 1574 John Watkins Road from SR 1548 to SR 1002 1.4 85,000.0 (Complete Funding) Contingency to be-Used for Overruns, Additions $45,641.0 to System, Paving Rural Fire Department Drives, aid Property Owner Participation Note: If right of way is not available on the above unpaved roads, the funds will be programed on other roads in the order of priority or applied on property owner participation paving. 004 ORANGE COUNTY PROPbSED 1983-1984 SECONDARY ROAD IHMOVEIE'NT PROGRAM • y 1983-1984• Secondary Allocation (Anticipated) $495,641.00 Map Priority SR. Estimated. ITO. No. No. Name'and Description Length Cost Paved Secondary Road_Imerovement 1 1919 Smith Level Road from SR 1962 to US 15-501 1.35 $74.000.00 Widen Four (4) Feet and Strengthen 2 1734, Erwin Road from US 15-501 to SR 1733 0.44 26,000.00 Widen Four (4) Feet and Strengthen. Spot Stabilization of Unpaved Roads SR 1550, SR 1712, SR 1575, SR 1131, SR_1531, $75,000.0[ SR 2001, SR 1525, SR 15331 SR 15359 SR 1519, SR 1335, SR 1556, SR 1520, SR 1515, SR-1572, SR 1569, SR 1130, SR 1955, SR 1127, SR 1135, SR 1141, SR 1143, SR 1341, SR 1340, SR 1336, SR 1113, SR 1115, SR 1175, SR 1950, SR 1114, SR 1137, SR 1140, SR 1182, SR 1730, SR 1538, SR 1540, SR 1541, SR 1516, SR 1548, SR 1508, SR 1536, SR 1512,. SR 1544, SR 1351, SR 1366, SR 1346, SR 1361, SR 1353, SR 1383 North d i. • � tM¢ 1175 �y I � 9 1 O i Qy;� ;RU$ R0. -- \ ITTT N °""moo ;� FAMA e. _ C M' f O MAC �V�� ITyy i• _ - � ``�• � t O ltd � FF1100mm`ry �? N ---. � t /• � nos . kC Sv '1lte Cr i — y 1 ; ''►arm, � sa X°� �' �9 1 +w� 'a"" uC0.'[ CAM a= to ra W M1/f1f �SW.�"Q 1005 SUlsm► S �D. 9 net t98q r l JI VQMC go RSr M. Nnt 004 ai 1 y MAY two 1 n� -wry t i ryq� •y �" y�j Y ......... F / t , .>~7 fJ a•ttlttp� �' /o r+ rw4 j �pti �h �- enui i P /. Jar �' IM Chatham °�. �. 9 j as County 4 4 cum Hrritoge Hills j a malft a,man ahcrny� o�os� chrarq� Ao T o�os ws churc•h Ro�I 7,M( churn i3o qp� SCALE: o aaoo' a V 4 b .xz�. c�uti c ~'y 01P $Q12�7 CF CG[•�1TSaxa`1=�.� .1/s..SC7� ��° :VIE June 27,. 1983 _ i Subjec�,-: MODIFICATION of CLASS A SPECIAL USE PERMIT FOR A GENERAL AVIATION AIRPORT FOR BUCK MOUNTAIN DEVELOPMENT COMPANY � �I *'ems: PLannin Eu1-11in Hearn I r: AttzckLa=n-.(S)_ a) Maintenance Hangak QX=Uon C=tZ=t- Marvin Collins Schematic;;b) See May 23, 1983 Public Heari = ate: 732-8181 Ext. 346 agenda packet. IMMU -: Continuation of the May 23, 1983 Public Hearing to receive citizen input on additional material submitted as part of the request to delete or modify. three (3) conditions placed on the approval of the Class A Special Use Permit granted Buck Mountain Development Corporation for a general aviation airport, NEED: At the May'23, 1983 Public Hearing, the Board of County Commissioners malted to continue the.public hearing on June 27.,• 1983 in order 'to .permit submittal of additional information on specific accessory uses to the.airport facility and the possible alternative fire access route through Meadowerest Subdivision. • I _ 1 o. IMPACT: Submittal of the additional information will facilitate continued discussion and public comment on the requested change to the Class A Special Use Permit, specifically Condition #3 and the addition'of uses not documented on the site plan approved through the Special Use Permit. • i I t4" 1. i T z r, C x:76 NORTH CAROLINA 014 ORANGE COUNTY AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT is entered into this day of , 1983 and by and between the Town of Carrboro, a municipal .corporation ("'Phew own) and Orange County,• a body politic and corporate ("The County"). WHEREAS, the County presently operates.and maintains a computer system serving various County departments and agencies and wishes to, make its computer operations and services available to the Town; and WHEREAS, the Town desires to purchase certain necessary computer services i from the County; � I NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and the mutual promises set forth below, the parties agree that, for an.initial payment and a fixed . j annual fee, the County shall provide 24-hour, 7 day a week computer services to the Town, including equipment,.:hardware and software maintenance, required operator training and software programs along with required communications linkage, with the following terms, conditions, and specifications: ; 1, Subject to paragraphs two and eight, the County shall provide to the . Town by July 1, 1983, the following required equipment; - Aa 2 Prism II Word Processing terminals B. 5 "Adds" Data,Processings Terminals C. 1 150 LPM Line Printer D. 2 4-Channel Multiplexers E. 2 9600 Baud Modems F. 2 Two-way automatic "Intelligent" Switches G. 1 Manual 3-way Switch H. 1 Manual.2-way Switch I. 2 One Channel Modem (to Public Works Shop) J: 1 300-500 wmp "Letter Quality" Printer 2. The County shall not be required to purchase more than $20,000 in equipment to meet the requirements of paragraph one. Ownership of equipment purchased pursuant-to this agreement shall remain in Orange County, However, in the event less than $20,000 is expended to meet these requirements, the initial payment (see paragraph 12) shall, be reduced by the difference between $20,000 and the amount actually spent. The Town of Carrboro may provide addi- tional funds for equipment cost exceeding $20,000 or have the option of deleting certain equipment items except for Items D and E.. 3. The County shall provide all equipment maintenance. The level of maintenance shall be the same as that provided for other users of the Orange County Data Processing System. The Town shall be responsible for repair of and the cost of repair and replacement to and the cost of replacement to equipment damaged by the Town's negligent or abusive use of the equipment. 4. The County shall not be liable for any and all damages incurred by A the Town caused by interruption and/or delay of service from causes not under its direct control. Causes of such interruption and/or delays may include but is not limited to, telephone line failure, and equipment failure. However, the County shall do all things reasonably expected to bring the service up to the required level as soon as possible.after identification of the problem causing the interruption and/or delay. 4,x1 UIU 5. The County shall provide the same "software" maintenance services as provided other users of the Orange County Data Processing System, 6. The County shall make available to the Town all existing "software" operational programs or new programs or re-programming that may become available to other users of the Orange County Data Processing System. The County agrees to make such "cosmetic" changes, as may be required to meet the particular needs, of the-Town, such changes not to exceed.200 hours of programming. Additional programming is to be charged to the Town,at'�a rate not to exceed $20 per hour. The hourly charge may be adjusted at the end 'of each year of the agreement to reflect increase in cost. This adjustment may not exceed 5% per year. 7. The County shall provide required operator training for each program to be used by the Town. 8. The County shall provide necessary communication .linkage, including linkages between the Town's.Publ.i.c Works garage located on Highway 54 at Greensboro.Street and the Town Hall for one terminal and the required linkage between Town Hall and the Central Processing unit facilities located in Hills- borough for all equipment. 9.. The County shall provide all installation and have all equipment and software programs operational with operator training complete by July 1, 1983, unless the Town of Carrboro specifically waves some portion of this requirement. In the event the system is not functional July 1, 1983, the County shall refund a prorata share of the monthly cost based upon the number of working days in the month the system was not functional. 10. Subsequent to initial.installation, -the County shall provide the Town with -the same level of service, including user priorities as other users of the Orange County Data Processing System. 11. The County shall provide a security system as a part of the software programming that will permit the Town to assign user accessibility. 12. The County shall provide the same data security and retention of data for the Town as provided for other users of the system, including daily "back-up" and other routine security storage. 13. Subject to paragraph two, the Town shall make an initial payment to Orange County of $8,500. This .payment'shall be made not later than July 1, 1983. 14. The Town shall make an annual payment to the County in the amount of twelve thousand dollars. Such payment shall be made on July 1 , 1983 and on July 1 of 1984, 1985, and 1986. 15. This agreement shall begin July 1, 1983 and end June 30, 1987. i -, ....4 72 0.16 This agreement is executed in. duplicate originals the day and year first written above. TOWN OF CARRBORO ORANGE COUNTY By: By;i and unter, own Manager char Witted, air Orange County Board of Commissioners Attest: Attest: Sarah C. 1 Aamson, own C er a to e• ounty Comm�ss7aners Provision for payment has been made by an appropriation duly made or bonds. or notes , duly 'authorized, pursuant to the Local Government Budget and Fiscal Control Act. Don Casper, finance erector i i I i ,. 47Z � ° RESLTLTS OF BID OPENING ° APPLICATION NUMBER 63 04,INER- Samuel Jo COST ESTIMATE: 6,438°00 ADDRESS: Hill Street PERCENTAGE OF BID OVER 10.52 UNDER CHECK ONE: JOB BID JOB NEGOTIATED BID AMOUNT COMPANY 1. Frank Griffin & Associates Gates Construction 8,365.00 Z. � Taylor Home Improvements 7,195.00 3. i 4. 5. i . i Bids .opened by: Robert Wilson Time of Bid Opening: i F Date of Bid Openin June 17, 1983 Witnessed by: Roxanne Warren i #3e3eie4e3estt3r3rie�k�c9e3c3r�*3e3r dc��3r�r3e de:k�ck�e3e 3e9e 3cde�cir�e3r9ejri:'c�tk�t-k�*ick�iraC��ric3c�s'k�3r:h�r�.tkt�ent*�k Lowest Acceptable Bids 7,195.00 Negotiated Amount: N/A Taylor Home Improvement Contractor: NAME 1156 Fiske Street Durham N.C. 2 7 ADDRESS 688-3214 - PHONE NUMBER � I Com,EENTS: i DXrE- Submitted by: -- Bid Approved by: Proceed Order: Issued Not issued CO*,ANTS: - 474F f RESULTS OF R:: u:E?tzhG APPLICATION NUMBER 144 p:.�wR:• Caleb ��lo r �1.JT DR SS E : Harper Street .COST ESTIMATE: 32 ?ZRCENTAGE OF BID .OVER 1.14 UNDER CHECK ONE: JOB BID M JOB NEGOTIATED r= COKPANY BID_AMOUNT 1. Frank Griffin &:Associates 9 485.0 7,681L 00 2. Gates Constri,Ctia j 3. Taylor Home Im rov m 6,395.00 i 4. I Bids opened by: Rn-ipct Wilson Time of Bid Opening: 3:0 i Date of Bid Opening June 17 1983 Witnessed by: Roxanne Warren Lowest Acceptable Bid: 6,395.00 I Negotiated Amount: NSA j Contractor: Taylor Home Improvement NAN,E 1156 Fiske Street, Durham, N.C. 27707 ADDRESS 688-3214 PHONE N"- ER JI Co:n`[ENTS: Community Development's contribution towards the rehabilitation of this dwelling unit will be $6,000.00. I Submitted by: DATE I Bid Approved by: Proceed Order: Issued Not Issued Q Cp:L`917iTS: I k 021 , i I Orange County Proposed r 1982 - 83 Budget Amendment The 1982 - 83 Budget Ordinance of Orange County as adopted on June 22, 1982, and subsequently amended, is hereby amended as follows: GENERAL FUND: a) Appropriation: I Sheriff $ 3,800. Source: Jail Fees - State Reimbursements $ 3,800. To increase Sheriff's Board and Provisions account. b) Appropriation: 1 t Elections $ 6,500. County Commissioners 5,000. Source: i Contingency $ 11,500. i To cover under-budgeted items. c) Appropriation: Janus House $ 600. i f Source: Community Based Alternatives $ 600. To accept additional year-end allocation. I i Y. A Adopted this day of 1983. [y 'm 47C . s 023 Orange County Proposed 1982 - 83 Project Ordinance . Amendment The 1982 - 83 Project Ordinance of Orange County as adopted on September 27,. 1982 ., and subsequently amended, is hereby amended as follows: CETA: a) Source of Revenue: CETA IV SYEP Grant $206,264. Appropriation: I - CETA Admin Pool - .Personnel 16,852. E - Operations 21012. CETA IV SYEP - Participants - Personnel 150,174. - Operations 3,893. CETA IV SYEP - Service Staff - Personnel 32,202. - Operations 1,131. To accept CETA IV SYEP Grant. b) Source of Revenue: OPC Mental Health $ . 4,Q88. Appropriation: CETA - Willie M 4,088. i To accept contract entered between OPC Mental Health and Orange County Employment and Training. 1 Adopted this day of , _ 9 .1983. i OaZLZE CCU: 4 Tt Q24- BaP00 (F Ca-21ISSza-NI—ERS Action lq�� i - Acczc` F��:iay rya E,is•t•:>��:cz zt:�: iu-.ar~.�� rT?1G I)Z June 27, 1983 Subject: Participatory Paving Project Planning PubU H -U19: YZS X no At zchsr�rit:(5)= M fne ►�'_a' contact: Susan Smith • 1?Ictise iqumrbl -^x: 732-8181 Fact. 359• °C1RP0�: Board approval of request that Northside Drive (SR 1964) be paved under the' Orange County Participatory Paving Program.• j s NEM: Northside Drive is an unpaved'state-maintained road in Dogwood Acres which intersects with Smith Level Road (SR 1919) at its western end and Carlton , Drive (SR 1990) 'at its eastern end. Both of the referenced roads are paved. Northside Drive serves 23 residential lots. SY TH IiE IV�,�, - uNlv�es+w "W WACT: Acceptance of the project into the Participato ving Program will provide for improvement of the road during the 1983-84 Secondary Roads Improvement y program. If accepted, Northside Drive will become project #3 on the Orange County . Approved Projects list. The local share of the construction costs is $5,440, bringing the total Program project funding requirements to $35,414 to date. I - I RECOMMENDATION: Acceptance of Northside Drive (SR 1964) as a Participatory Paving Program project. " - I 027 STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA ) CONTRACT OF EMPLOYMENT COUNTY OF ORANGE ) THIS CONTRACT made and entered into this the day of ,.1983, by and between Orange County, hereinafter County, and Coleman, Bernholz, Dickerson, Bernholz, Gledhill and Hargrave, hereinafter Attorneys. � .WITNESSETH-- I THAT WHEREAS, the County desires to employ Attorneys as its x counselors at law for.the County of Orange upon the following terms: ! 1.. This Contract shall begin July 1, 1983 and unless sooner terminated by 30 days' notice of either party shall exist and continue through . I June 30, 1984. a 2. Attorneys, upon reasonable notice, -are to be available for ; consultation, legal advice and for representation as requested by the Child 1 m Support Enforcement Agency on all legal matters arising from the duties of County under Sections 128 through 140 of Chapter 110 of the North Carolina General Statutes and Title 42 of the United States Code, Sections 651 through 660 and the federal regulations lawfully promulgated pursuant thereto. 3. Recognizing that from time to time representation of County by Attorneys may result in a conflict of interest for the Attorneys, it is agreed that when such a conflict arises, the Attorneys may refer cases requiring legal services to other lawyers in Orange County. Such referrals shall be with the consent and approval of the County Manager. In all cases of referrals, the attorney to which the case is referred shall be compensated in the same manner as specified in paragraph 5 below, and shall keep an itemized record of work performed County on a case-by-case basis, submitting 474.. 028 a bill therefor showing a breakdown of services performed on a case-by-case basis as specified in paragraph 5. In the event such an attorney is awarded counsel fees by the Court in this regard, an accounting shall be made to County in the same manner as provided for in paragraph 5 below. 4. Attorneys agree to comply with all the requirements of Sections 128 through 140 of Chapter 110 of .the North Carolina General ! _ i Statutes, Title 42 of the United States Code, Sections 651 through 660, and s the regulations promulgated pursuant thereto .relating .to the performance of 5 program legal services including, but not limited to, maintaining such records ! � i as are required by County, to make said reports available for federal or state audit, if required, and to make financial, statistical, and program progress reports as are required. 5. For their services under this contract, County agrees to pay i Attorneys Forty-Five and No/100 Dollars ($45.00) per.hour for each hour spent j by them providing legal services under the Child Support Enforcement Program. Suctr hourly rate shall encompass all expenses, including but not a i limited to, those for salary; supplies, office space, heating and maintenance for office space, telephone service, long-distance telephone calls, and travel. Attorneys are not to be reimbursed for any extraordinary expense incident to i performing the services included under this agreement; except, that County agrees to pay all court costs and filing fees which are required to be paid in i conjunction with services provided by the .attorneys under this agreement. S. Attorneys further agree to attend at least one training session I on Child Support Enforcement per year conducted by the Child Support Enforcement Agency. Reimbursement shall be made based upon the hourly rate but not to exceed a maximum of $150.00 or such amount as set by the 029 State Child Support Enforcement Agency. Failure to attend one approved workshop per year shall be construed as an indication that Attorneys do not wish to continue providing services under this agreement. IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, said parties.have executed this contract in triplicate originals, one of which is to be retained by County, one of which is to be retained by Attorneys, and one of which is to be filed with the Child Support Enforcement Section, Division of Social1ft'vices of the Department of I 5 Human Resources, Raleigh, North Carolina.. . COLEMAN, BERKHOLZ, DICKERSON, BERNHOLZ,.GLEDHILL AND HARGRAVE i � BY g _ eof r e ORANGE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA BY: Richard E. Whitted Chairman = ATTEST: i Y I Paulette Pridgen-Pond Clerk to the Board of Commissioners This instrument has been + preaudited in the manner required by the � Local Government Budget and Fiscal Control Act. I Orange County Finance Officer i 481 i.!34 l STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA ' COUNTY OF ORANGE THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this the 1st day of July, 1983, by and between NORTHEN & LITTLE, Orange County, North Carolina, a partnership organized under the laws of the State of North Carolina engaging in the practice of law, hereinafter referred to as ATTORNEYS, and ORANGE COUNTY, hereinafter referred to as the COUNTY: s W I T N E S S E T H WHEREAS the Orange County Department of Social Services (hereinafter referred to as the DEPARTMENT) has need of special legal services, not I otherwise provided by County government agencies, in connection with its i services to needy and dependent persons in Orange County, the administration of its functions under the provisions of Article 8, Chapter 110 of the General Statutes of North Carolina and other laws of the State and representation of the DEPARTMENT, its caseworkers and employees before the I various courts and agencies of the State of North Carolina; and WHEREAS, it is the desire of the COUNTY and ATTORNEYS to enter into a _ I contract, one with the other, for the purposes and considerations as set i forth herein for a period of July 1, 1983 through June 30, 1984; I NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and mutual terms and agreements hereinafter set forth, the COUNTY and ATTORNEYS do contract, each I with the other, as follows: 1. That ATTORNEYS shall perform such services and render such advice i to the DEPARTMENT on such occasions as shall be required by the Director of ! the DEPARTMENT and with the approval of said Director, employees and caseworkers shall require the services of ATTORNEYS. I i 2. That ATTORNEYS shall be compensated for all services rendered in connection with Paragraph No. 1 above based on an hourly rate for services performed of Forty--Five Dollars ($45.00) per hour, such hours and amounts to i be furnished to the County Finance Officer or his designate for payment. I The ATTORNEYS shall also be•compensated for and reimbursed for the services i of clerks and legal assistants hired by them to assist them in the performance of their duties to the DEPARTMENT, based on an hourly rate of NORTHEN&LITTLE I ATTORNETS AT LAW 6T. services performed of Ten Dollars ($10.00) per hour. The COUNTY shall be 4s1 W,FRANKLIN CHAPEL HILL.N,C.$7514 responsible for all costs and expenses incurred in the performance of the i 1 I I } r 48r I -2- services rendered the COUNTY pursuant to this Contract. All Costs and expenses advanced by ATTORNEYS on behalf of COUNTY shall be reimbursed to AT MINE YS. 3. That ATTORNEYS shall keep an itemized record of work performed for the DEPARTMENT on a case-by-case basis and shall submit its bill therefor showing a breakdown of those services performed and the cost. 4. That this Agreement shall exist and continue from July 1, 1983 to and including June 30, 1984, unless sooner terminated by thirty (30) days written notice to the other party. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the COUNTY and ATTORNEYS have hereunto signed this Agreement in duplicate originals, one of which is retained by each party hereto and either of which is sufficient as the original. ORANGE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA By:, , RICHARD E. WHITTED Chair Orange County Board of Commissioners Attest: Sharon Allison Acting Clerk of the Orange County ! Board of Commissioners NORTHEN & LITTLE Attorneys at Law i By: ERSON LITTLE i This instrument has been preaudited in the manner required by the i Local Government Budget and Fiscal Control Act. i NoRTHEN eLITrLE WALLACE HARDING, Orange County Finance Officer ATTORNEYS AT LAW •at W.PRANRLIry ST. CHAPEL HILL,N.C.27514 f % 1