Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes - 19830118 L MINUTES JANUARY 18, 1983 The Orange County Board of Commissioners met in regular session on Tuesday, January 18, 1983, air.7:30 P.M. in the Courtroom of the Old Post Office Building in Chapel Hill, North Carolina. Commissioners present: Chairman Richard E. 14hi-tted and Commissioners Ben Lloyd, Shirley E. Marshall, Norman Walker and Lon 'Wil7,hoit. A. BOARD COMMENTS Commissioner Whitted added two items to the agenda, both dealing with prp_ posed local legislation. Commissioner Lloyd announced that a local newspaper had incorrectly reported his comments on meeting once a month in Chapel Hill; he said he is in favor of meeting in Chapel Hill. B. AUDIENCE COMMENTS Commissioner ',RLitted said that he knew there were several people in the audience who wished to address the Board about items on the agenda and they would be given that opportunity during the course of the evening. Chapel H;LU Councilmember Jonathan Howes welcomed the Commissioners to Chapel Hill on behalf of the Council; Chapel Hill_Carrboro Chamber of Commerce President John Morgan welcomed the Commissioners to Chapel Hill on behalf of the Chamber. C. PUBLIC HEARING: PRELIMINARY ASSESS14E<1T ROLLS--MACZ ROAD AND DUMONT DRIVE PARTICIPATORY PAMIG MACE ROAD: Ms. Susan Smith, Planning Department, told the Board that all participants were in favor of the project for Mace Road. Commissioner Villhoit moved, seconded by Commissioner Marshall, approval of the Final Assessment Roll for Mace Road Participatory Paving at 7:36 F.M. Vote: Ayes, 5; noes, 0. (All documents relating to the Assessment Roll for Mace ,Road may be found on pages 3�ps-.Ja of this book.) DUMONT DRIVE: Ms. Smith made two corrections in the Assessment Roll for Dumont Drive. The first is an error in the names of Jack Patterson Loy and Gladys C._ Loy who are listed as Jake Patterson Loy and Gladys Patterson on the Assessment Roll as prepared from the Tax Listing. The second is an error on the tax maps of one of the lots owned by Mr. John H. McInnis showing 100'more than actually exists on Mr.McInnis' plat. Ms. Smith said the County Commissioners could do one of two things regarding this error: 1) readvertise and reassess the ind-. ividual property otiners, or, 2) the County could absorb the cost of the error. Ms. Smith said the County Attorney said it would cost approximately $195.00 to readvertise plus attorney's fees and staff time. The error is approximately $195.00 also. Commissioner Willhoit moved, seconded by Commissioner Marshall, to confirm the Final Assessment Roll for Dumont Drive as corrected at 7:40 P.M. and for the County to absorb the cost of the error on Mr. McInnis' property. Vote: Ayes, 5; noes, 0. (A71 document.$ relating the the confirmation of the Assessment Roll. for Dumont Drive may be found on pages 'd� f this book.) D. BOARD DECISIONS D-3 SEVEPT SPRIPIGS ROAD ADDITION Commissioner Walker moved, seconded by Commissioner Lloyd, the addition of Seven Springs Road in Seven Springs Subdivision to the State maintained secondary road System. Vote: Ayes, 5; noes, 0. D-4 COMPLAINTS RE: WILD AND VICIOUS ANIMALS The Board chose to listen to citizens' Comments prior to discussion of this issue among themselves. Mr. Bill Sheffield, an attorney: Said that he was representing a number of people from both Duke University and UNC who owned small animals called servals. He said the Board had several options: 1) do nothing--he advises against that option; Z) flat prohibition--he feels this option is "unwise"; 3) adopt an Ordinance regulating wildlife--he feels this is most appropriate. Mr. Sheffield passed copies to the Board of an Ordinance regulating wild animals which he helped draft. He said the unique quality to this ordinance was its classification system of animals. He urged the Board to consider this proposed ordinance closely. Ms. Lorie Stephenson, a resident near an animal compound: Spoke asking that an ordinance be adopted which prohibits such wild animals /leopards, tigers, bears, etc.% within Orange County. She presented a petition to the Commissioners from people in her neighborhood who supported such a. prohibition. /That petition is on permanent file in the Office of the Clerk to the Board.] Ms. Stephenson cited safety concerns for adults and particularly children should such exotic animals escape. She added that she was concerned for the animals' safety too, as, in con- . , versation with Dr. Richard Kelly of the USDA in Raleigh, she learned that the com- pound off NC 86 does not meet minimum requirements for such enclosures. Mr. Jack Griffith, UNC Staff and County resident: Urged the Board to consider an ordinance of the type presented by Mr. Sheffield which claps ifies animals. He said such an ordinance provided protection for citizens and personal freedom for individuals who wished to keep such animals; an example he gave was keeping the animals for research purposes. He said he does keep servals for researc. and described his enclosure for the animals, Mr. Griffith cited the unique aspects of the Research Triangle Park, climate, professional researchers and yet still rural, which made it attractive to those doing such animal research. Mr. Griffith summed up his statement by saying that adoption of an ordinance such as Mr. Sheffield's would: 1) protect the public; 2) protect the animals; and, 3) provide a humane environment for the animals. Mr. Paul Modrich and Ms. Vickers Burdette, a husband and wife who live in Orange County and are on Duke's Staff: Both urged a rational approach to animal control . They own servals. They urged the classification approach to exotic animal control . Mr. Tim Greene, Orange County resident and owner of several exotic animals: Said he wished to clarify that the animals belong to him personally, and are not in any way connected with Greene Valley Kennels. He maintains that his animals are properly enclosed however, he said he planned to put up a fence. Mr. Greene invited the Commissioners to visit his animals. He said the USDA had refused him accredition , for two reasons: 1) fecal discharge; and, 2) a mudhole that existed when the inspector , visited. Mr. Greene described his enclosures and reiterated the safety of such , enclosures, He urged a "reasonable" ordinance and said he is opposed to banning , exotic animals from the County. Ms. Patrice Solberg, an attorney representing residents near Mr. Greene's 0 property, including herself: Cited the series of events which led to several of , the exotic animals being moved from Chatham County to Orange County. She continued , that cows had miscarried in Chatham County, due, presumably to the lions making noise; and, that one cow had been killed while the leopards were loose in Chatham County. , She added that there were no eyewitnesses to the killing but the cow's owner had , said its back was slashed open. She said the risk to human life was not worth taking 6 and asked for a total ban on exotic animals in Orange County under the authority • granted the Board by G.S. 153-A Article 6. Ms. Solberg said Ms. Sue Pressman, of the Humane Society of America and the American Veterinary Association both e • recommended a ban on private ownership of these types of animals. Mr. Wilson McKerrow, Chapel Hill resident: Said that he was a member of the Board of Directors of the National Humane Association for eighteen years and it is not in the interest of either the public or the animals that such animals be kept in confinement such as he had heard described tonight. He urged the Board consider an ordinance for protection of the public and the neighborhood. Ms. Karla Ball, County resident: Cited an obligation to "these rare animals" and called for a responsible County ordinance which set reasonable standards for keeping exotic animals. She asked that they not be banned from the County. Mr. Olin Doar, County resident: Said he worked at Green Valley Farms where his wife is a partner. Green Valley Farms is, he emphasized, a dog and domestic cat boarding and breeding facility only; no exotic animals are kept there. He added that Ms. Sue Pressman had helped Mr. Green obtain his first leopard in .Virginia where the Greens had gone to an animal auction. Mr. Green was interested in the leopard and Ms. Pressman told him there was a question as to whether or not this "was a free and legal cat" due to its having been purchased in North Carolina and taken without a permit to Virginia. With Ms. Pressman's help the Greens bought the leopard legally and returned to North Carolina without a permit. The USDA discovered this via the press which reported it. A representative of the USDA visited the Greens and eventually "con- fiscated that animal on our property for the leopard's life, until it died." He said the leopard belongs to Tim Green and is on his property now. Mr. Doar added that they had been unable to give the cat to any zoo because the zoos were unwilling to accept it. Ms. Jacquline Moredoch, Curator at the NC Museum of Life and Science and Orange County resident: Said the public was not well educated about exotic animals and that indiscriminate breeding of such animals needed to be controlled. She said she owned a cat and doesn't think they should be banned. Commissioner Whitted asked Ms. Moredoch how, if private ownership were per- ' mitted, breeding could be controlled. Ms. Moredoch said the owners would have to come to an agreement regarding that. Commissioner Lloyd asked if the animals could be kept without endangering the public. Ms. Moredoch replied that the Museum was able to do so adding that housing requirements should be very strict. Commissioner Marshall asked who provided the license and inspection for the Museum and Ms. Moredoch replied the Fish and Wildlife Service inspected every six weeks. She continued replying to Commissioner Walker that the Fish and Wildlife Service had no jurisdiction over Mr. Greene as he is a private individual . Mr. Sheffield said that the servals were particularly selected for their genetic makeup and that most zoos don't want genetically unknown cats. He con- tinued that devices were implanted in the females (to prevent conception and removed if a zoo wished to breed the animals. Mr. Greene: Replied that the tigers from Pittsboro were particularly selected for genetic content. He continued that the animals were very rare and we should do something to preserve them. He contended that the bears had not escaped from their enclosure, but from leashes; he said the tigers had been frightened by a helicopter which landed near their cage and escaped then. He said that Dr. Bleyman had tranquilized the animals by hand even though "they are wild and vicious animals." Mr. Bruce Gay, a neighbor of Ms. Stephenson's: Cited safety concerns for his family. He noted that he was present when the bears escaped and said the keepers "scratched their heads" and wondered what to do. Mr. Greene: Replied that the bears would be gone in six months. Mr. Whitford, a geneticist and researcher: Urged serious consideration of the ordinance proposed by Mr. Sheffield, noting that the classification system for different animals distinguished between those animals which are dangerous to human beings and those which normally are not by specifying different confinement requirements. As a geneticist he noted the importance of preserving animals for research and said he felt that the private, well-informed individual could do a better job breeding animals than zoos. There were no other citizens who wished to speak on this matter and Board discussion ensued. Enforcement of any proposed ordinance, the Board agreed, appeared to be a major problem. Commissioner Marshall moved, seconded by Commissioner Willhoit, to refer all ordinances provided in the agenda packet and those presented by Ms. Solberg and Mr. Sheffield to the Manager and County Attorney; enforcement questions as , well as fiscal impact are to be included in the Manager's report. Vote: Ayes, 5; noes, 0. Mr. Bleyman, an animal owner from Chatham County, said that most people will • comply with an animal control ordinance but that he foresaw the possibility that those • people who own poisonous reptiles would be driven underground. Following this vote the Commissioners took a five minute break. Commissioner • Walker left the meeting during the break and did not return. D-5 SECTION 8 HOUSING CONTRACT The County Manager reviewed the contract with the Board of Commissioners. Commissioner Marshall moved, seconded by Commissioner Willhoit, to approve the contract. Vote: Ayes, 4; noes, 0. D-6 AUDIT CONTRACT Commissioner Willhoit moved, seconded by Commissioner Marshall, to approve the audit contract for 1982-83 to Touche Ross and Company, for the County audit. Vote: Ayes, 4; noes, 0. D-7 BUDGET AMENDMENT Commissioner Willhoit moved, seconded by Commissioner Marshall, to approve the budget amendments as recommended by the Manager. Vote: Ayes, 4; noes, 0. (See page 41NI of this book'for those amendments.) D-8 HOUSING REHAB AWARDS Commissioner Marshall moved, seconded by Commissioner Whitted, to award the rehabilitation contracts to Taylor Home Improvement for units 29 and 29A ($8,010.00 and $8,115.00 respectively) and to Eugene Morrow for unit 35 for $7,148.00. Vote: Ayes, 4; noes, 0. (For complete bid results see pages y44,1'of this book.) D-9 FEBRUARY MEETING SCHEDULE Commissioner Lloyd moved, seconded by Commissioner Willhoit, to cancel the fourth Monday meeting in February (February 28). Vote: Ayes, 4; noes, 0. Commissioner Whitted announced that the Manager had a tentative date for a joint meeting with the two Boards of Education; this meeting is a follow up meeting to the October 7, 1982, where capital needs were discussed. The Manager announced February 14th as the recommended date. Commissioner Willhoit moved, seconded by Commissioner Lloyd, to schedule a joint meeting with the Chapel Hill- Carrboro and Orange County Boards of Education to discuss capital needs budgeting. Vote: Ayes, 4; noes, 0. E. SOCIAL SERVICES REPORT Mr. Tom Ward, Social Services Director, presented a report on the Child Protective Services and Adult Protective Services showing the impact on meeting the mandated services of the DSS of the additionally-funded -persorinel 'in the Protective Services program; statistics indicate that now the time mandates usually can be met qnd indicate, that the increase in the percentage of neglect over abuse cases may be due to the earlier intervention possible with the increased workers. DSS, now meeting mandated schedules in Child Protective Services is much closer to meeting them in Adult Protective Services where there is an increased demand for services. Ms. Janice Schopler, Chair of the Social Services Board, said that morale in the department has improved due to the increase in workers and everyone is doing a better job. D-10 PARCEL IDENTIFICATION NUMBER INDEX--Added Item Commissioner Willhoit moved, seconded by Commissioner Marshall, to approve c the Register of Deeds' request that we ask our local legislators to introduce a bill enabling Orange County to institute the PIN prior to July 1, 1983. Vote: Ayes, 4; noes, 0. D-11 ONE STOP ABSENTEE VOTING--Added Item Commissioner Whitted said he had received a letter from Representative Barnes wherein she proposed legislation to permit establishment of a branch voter registration office in Chapel Hill if the Board so desired. Commissioner Willhoit moved, seconded by Commissioner Marshall, to request this legislation of our delegation for Orange County. Vote: Ayes, 4; noes, 0. With no further business to come before the Board, Commissioner Willhoit moved, seconded by Commissioner Whitted, to adjourn. Vote: Ayes, 4; noes, 0. Richard E. Whitted, Chair Paulette Pridgen, Clerk CERTIFICATE OF MAILING I, Paulette Pridgen Pond, Clerk to the Board of Commissioners of Orange County, North Carolina, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that on or about January 6, 1983, I mailed, by first-class mail, postage prepaid, a Notice to each property owner of the Public Hearing to be held on the Preliminary Assessment Roll for the financing by Orange County of the local share of the cost of paving Mace Road (S.R. 1384), located in Cheeks Township, Orange County, North Carolina. The Notice mailed set the date and time of the Public Hearing and also the amount of assessment on the property owned by the person to whom the Notice was sent according to the County tax records. WITNESS my hand and official seal of the Board of Commissioners of Orange County, North Carolina, this the day of January, 1983. aulette Pridgen Pond, Clerk .to the Board of Commissioners of Orange County, North Carolina ' y NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ON PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL FILED WITH THE CLERK TO THE BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF ORANGE COUNTY PURSUANT TO THE DIRECTION OF THE ORANGE COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS AND PURSUANT TO THE BOARD'S DECISION TO FINANCE THE LOCAL SHARE OF THE COST OF PAVING MACE ROAD (S.R. 1384), IN CHEEKS TOWNSHIP, ORANGE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA Notice is hereby given that, pursuant to Article 9 of Chapter WA of the General Statutes of North Carolina, the Board of Commissioners of Orange County has completed and filed a Preliminary Assessment Roll. Pursuant thereto: 1. Orange County shall undertake the financing of the local share of paving Mace Road (S.R. 1384), in Cheeks Township, Orange County, North Carolina. The amount to be financed by Orange County is estimated to be Eighteen Thousand Eight Hundred Thirty-Nine and 02/100 Dollars ($18,839.02), including costs and attorneys fees. That portion of the costs of paving the above roads not financed by Orange County will be borne by the Department of Transportation or the State of North Carolina. 2. The assessment roll completed is on file with the Clerk to the Board of Commissioners of Orange County, and available to the public for. inspection. 3. The Public Hearing will be held at 7:30 o'clock p.m. on January 18, 1983, at the Orange County Courthouse, Hillsborough, North Carolina, the regular place of meeting of the Board of Commissioners of Orange County, North Carolina, in order to discuss all matters pertaining to the Preliminary Assessment Roll. At the time and place above stated, any resident of Orange County or any other interested person may appear and be heard. Dated, this the 6th day of January, 1983. Paulette Pridgen Pond, Clerk to the Board of Commissioners of Orange County, North Carolina To The Durham Herald Papers Please publish once on January 6, 1983 and send proof of publication to Geoffrey E. Gledhill, 110 North Churton Street, Hillsborough, North Carolina 27278. r NOTICE TO: SUBJECT: PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE ORANGE COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS' DECISION TO FINANCE AND ASSESS THE LOCAL SHARE OF THE COST OF PAVING MACE ROAD (S.R. 1384), IN CHEEKS TOWNSHIP, ORANGE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA. PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that a Public Hearing will be held by the Orange County Board of Commissioners on January 18, 1983 at 7:30 o'clock p.m., at the Orange County Courthouse, Hillsborough, North Carolina, to discuss all matters pertaining to the subject Preliminary Assessment Roll. The Preliminary Assessment Roll has been filed with the Clerk to the Board of Commissioners of Orange County at the Orange County Courthouse, Hillsborough, North Carolina, and is available for public inspection. Please note that the amount of assessment on the property described in this Notice is S as shown on the Assessment Roll on file in the Office of the Clerk to the Board of Commissioners of Orange County, North Carolina. PAULETTE PRIDGEN POND, Clerk to the Board of Commissioners of Orange County, North Carolina � 4 The Board of Commissioners for the County of Orange, North Carolina, met in regular session in the Courtroom in Chapel Hill, North Carolina, the regular place of meeting, at 7:30 p.m. on January 18, 1983. Present: Commissioners Lloyd, Marshall, Walker, Whitted and Willhoit. Absent: None. The Chair announced that this was the hour and day fixed by the Board of Commissioners for the Public Hearing on the Preliminary Assessment Roll filed •with the Clerk. to the Board of Commissioners of Orange County pursuant to the direction of the Orange County Board of Commissioners and pursuant to the Board's decision to finance the local share of the cost of paving Mace Road (S.R. 1384), in Cheeks Township, Orange County, North Carolina. The Chair also announced that the Board of Commissioners would immediately hear anyone who might wish to be heard on the Preliminary Assessment Roll. No one appeared on the said Preliminary Assessment Roll. Thereupon, upon Motion of Commissioner Willhoit, seconded by Commissioner Marshall and carried, the Preliminary Assessment Roll for the financing by Orange County of the local share of the cost of paving Mace Road (S.R. 1384), in Cheeks Township, Orange County, North Carolina, was confirmed in toto. The vote upon confirmation of the assessment made against each property owner was: Ayes: Commissioners Lloyd, Marshall, Walker, Whitted and Willhoit. Noes: None. Upon motion of Commissioner Willhoit, seconded by Commissioner Marshall and unanimously approved, the Clerk to the Board was directed 'to enter into the minutes of the Board the confirmation date, hour, and minutes. Thereupon, the Clerk to the Board entered the confirmation effective 7:36 o'clock p.m., the 18th day of January, 1983. Upon motion of Commissioner Willhoit, seconded by Commissioner. Marshall and unanimously approved the Clerk to the Board was directed to deliver a copy of the confirmed Assessment Roll to the Orange County Tax Collector. Upon motion of Commissioner Willhoit, seconded by Commissioner Marshall and unanimously approved, the Orange County Tax. Collector was directed to publish once, a Notice, no earlier than 20 days from the date of confirmation as herein set forth, that the Assessment Roll for the financing by Orange County of the local share of the cost of paving Mace Road (S.R. 1384), located in Cheeks Township, Orange County, North Carolina, has been confirmed and that assessments may be paid without interest at any time before the expiration of 30 days from the day that the Notice is published and that if not paid within that time, all installments thereof shall bear interest in an amount equal to the interest on past due ad valorem taxes in Orange County. The Chair directed that said Notice shall be published in the Durham Herald Paper. Said Notice shall be in substantially the following form: NOTICE OF CONFIRMATION OF ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR THE FINANCING BY ORANGE COUNTY OF THE LOCAL SHARE OF THE COSTS OF PAVING MACE ROAD (S.R. 1384), LOCATED IN CHEEKS TOWNSHIP, ORANGE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA Notice is hereby given that pursuant to Article 9 of Chapter 153A of the General Statutes of North Carolina, the Board of Commissioners of Orange County has confirmed the Assessment Roll for the financing by Orange County of the local share of the cost of paving Mace Road (S.R 1384), in Cheeks Township, Orange County, North Carolina, in toto. The specifies of any adjustment made are in the minutes of the Orange County Board of Commissioners for its meeting on January 18, 1983. The confirmed Assessment Ron reflects any adjustment. Pursuant thereto: 1. The Board of Commissioners of the County of Orange, North Carolina, met in regular session in the Courtroom in Chapel Hill, North Carolina, at 7:30 p.m. on January 18, 1983. 2. The Chair announced that this was the hour and day fixed by the Board of Commissioners for the Public Hearing on the Preliminary Assessment Roll pursuant to the Board's decision to finance the local share of the cost of paving Mace Road (S.R. 1384), located in Cheeks Township, Orange County, North Carolina. 3. All persons attending and wishing to be heard were recognized by the Chair and were heard. 4. The Board confirmed the Assessment Roll and directed its delivery to the Orange County Tax Collector. 5. The assessments confirmed by the Board may be paid without interest at any time before the expiration of 30 days from the date of the publication of this Notice. If not paid within this time, all installments thereof shall bear interest at the rate set for past due Orange County ad valorem taxes. John T. Horner, Tax Collector for Orange County, North Carolina I, Paulette Pridgen Pond, Clerk to the Board of Commissioners for the County of Orange, North Carolina, do hereby certify that the foregoing is a true copy of so much of the. proceedings of the Board of Commissioners for said County at a meeting held on January 18, 1983, as relates in any way to the confirmation of the Assessment Roll for the financing by Orange County of the local share of the cost of paving Mace Road (S.R. 1384), located in Cheeks Township, Orange County, North Carolina. Paulette Pridgen Pond, Clerk to the Board of Commissioners of Orange County, North Carolina (SEAL) • i � t. PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE FINANCING AND ASSESSING BY ORANGE COUNTY OF THE LOCAL SHARE OF THE COST OF PAVING DUMONT DRIVE (S.R. 1595), IN ENO TOWNSHIP, ORANGE COUNTY, NORTII CAROLINA a The property described below, the names of the owners of 'said property, the assessment levied against each parcel of property, the basis for the assessment levied against said parcel and the terms of payment of the asse s;l;ent all set fortis below, together with tax maps of the project, constitute the assessment roll for the paving of Dumont Drive (S.R. 1595), in Eno Township, Orange County, North Carolina. BASIS FOR ASSESSMENT The basis for assessment against the property described bel.ov., is frontage abutting the road at an equal rate pc., foot of frontage. Tha togs amount asse<s..ed is ?24,688.00 which represents the total local share of tha c,-3L of this project. TERMS OF PAYMENT OF ASSESSMENT A. Within. thirty (30) days after notice of- the confirmation cf assessment roll is published each owner of assessed property may pay his or h r assessment in full without interest. B. Any assessment not paid in full as provided above shall be paid in five (5) equal annual installments with the first such installment, ti}ith interest, due when 1983 property taxes are due, and the remaining installrents, vJth interest, due on the same date in each success,ve year until the ass sn e�t is paid in full. 7 . 4 4 r• ' ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR THE LOCAL SHARE OF TEE COST OF .PAVING DUD.JONT DRIVE (S.R. 1595), IN ENO TOWETSI.11P, ORANGE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA Map, Property Owners Amount of Block & rYtailingAddress Assessment & Lot 1.1,6 Charlie Thompson $1610.16 Route 1, Box 134 Hillsborough, N.C. 27278 11,7 Roy B. Zuieidinger $1888.93 Ruth Zuieidinger Route 1, Box 184XX Hillsborough, N.C. 27278 14,8 Crawford J. Make, Jr. $1306.14 Brenda H. Riley 5755 Roxboro Road Durham, N.C. 27712 A-��-- _ 14,8 =-crest-r•rrLo� D $790.60 Gladys =«p,,a- 9114 Veeittte-1, Box 488E 11'4i Hillsborough, N.C. 2727E 14,10 Betsv Levin $1467.03 University of Colorado at Boulder Campus Box-1401 Boulder, Colorado 80309 14,12 James 77. Condie $858.05 Gal. M. Condie Route 1, Box 184C7 Hillsborough, N.C. 27278 14,13 Macon B. 011is $440.10 Linda B. 011is Route 1, Box 184E Hillsborough, I1T.C. 27273 14,25 Leacho W. Walker, Jr. $331.99 Carolyn Walker 672 McAdams Road Hillsborough, N.C. 27278 14,25 Leacho W. Walker, Carolyn Walker $629,19 672 McAdams Road Hillsborough, NC 27278 14,27 Clarence Yarrboroug'h $330.54 Willie Yarrborough 428 Crescent Burlington, N.C. 27215 14,28 Dorothy Price $311.24 P. O. Box 97 Holiday Park Hillsborough, N.C. 27278 14,29 John. H. McInnis $321.24 Lillie -McInnis 615 Ripp'_in- Stream F-ond Durham, N.C. 27704 14,30 Leacho 11. Walker, Jr. $311.24 Carolyn Walker 672 McAdams Road Hillsborough, N.C. 27273 14,31 Milton Townsend $435.74 Gloria Townsend P. 0. Box 157 Hillsborough, N.C. 27278 14,32 John H. McInnis $1522.49 Lillie McInnis 615 Rippling Stream Road Durham, N.C. 27704 14,33 Walter Fairbuult $555.13 Daisy Fairbault R.cite 1, Box 184C Hillsborough, V.C. 27278 14,35 Cla:ence Yarborough $622.38 Willie Yarborough 428 Crescent Burlington, N.C. 27215 14,36 Ledhard Mayo $443.87 Elizabeu-� Mayo P.O. Box 237 Iiillsboroulh, NC 27278 14,37 . Robert Maxwell and Lilian Maxwell $1029.59 2244 Sanford Lane Charlotte, NC 28211 14,6A James P/I. Thompson $1265.74 Ruthlean Thompson Route 1, Box 184-42 Hillsborough, N.C. 27278 14,6E Dempsey L. 17hitted $444.37 Mary ltihitted P. C. Box 547 Hillscorough, N.C. 27278 14,6C Howard Vanhooke, Jr. $974.71 Majorie Vanhooke Route 1, Box 184-32 Hillsborough, N.C. 27278 14,6D Willie L. Glover $435.74 Rosette Glover P. O. Box 831 Hillsborough, N.C. 27273 14,6F Willie L. Glover $618.31 Rosetta Glover P. O. Boy 881 Hillsborough, N.C. 27278 14,6F Clarence Mayo $584.51 Corine Mayo P. O. Box 312 Hillsborough, N.C. 27278 14,6G James H. Smith $632.86 A-molia Smith P. O. Box 50S Hillsborough, N.C. 27278 14,613 Frank P. Penn, Jr. 4 $311.24 . Jean Penn P. O. Boa 386 Iiillsborough, N.C. 27278 14, 61 Lr!roy Hope, Frances L. Hope $481.28 1'--'6 R.o,,?er Road Graham, NC 27253 15,12 Edmund A. Reiss $965.GO Louise Reiss Route 3, Box 137 Durham, N.C. 27713 15,13 Noah T. Dunn $674.36 Sherdb Dunn 415 Whitt Road Durham, N.C. 27712 13,1 Virgiria D. Edwards $771.88 Route 1, Pox 184 6 Hillsborough, N.C. 27278 18,2 Alinnie MI. Kelly $946.11 Route 1, Box 184-rd;. Hillsborough, N.C. 27278 18,3 W.D.Petty, F.A. Ward, and $62.25 J.T. Pickard P.O. Box 8794 Durham, NC 27700 CERTIFICATE OF MAILING I, Paulette Pridgen Pond, Clerk to the Board of Commissioners of Orange County, North Carolina, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that on or about January 6, 1983, I mailed, by first-class mail, postage prepaid, a Notice to each property owner of the Public Bearing to be held on the Preliminary Assessment Roll for the financing by Orange County of the local share of the cost of paving Dumont Drive (S.R. 1595), located in Eno Township, Orange County, North Carolina. The Notice mailed set the date and time of the Public Hearing and also the amount of assessment on the property owned by the person to whom the Notice was sent according to the County tax records. WITNESS my hand and official seal of the Board of Commissioners of Cl. Orange County, North Carolina, this the day of January, 1983. Paulette Pridgen Pond, Clerk to the Board of Commissioners of Orange County, North Carolina ORDINANCE The Wilson County Board of Commissioners does hereby ordain and enact as follows: POSSESSION Or NON-DOMESTIC ;INimXLS paoHIBITED 1. Except as herein Provided, it shall be unlawful for any person, firm or corporation to possess or harbor any non- domestic animal or ani.nals in Wilson_ county which are dangerous to persons or property or which have the potential Of being- dangerous to persons or property. This ordinance shall not apply to bona fide circuses,. petting zoos and other traveling cor„rercial animal exhibitions of limited duration- 2. The violation of this ordinance shall be a misdemeanor and any person. convicted Of such violation shall be punishable as provided in G.S. 14-4. Each dav,s" violation of this ordinance is a separate offense. In addition r ens orcemert of this ordinance may be by appropriate equitable remedy, injunction, or order of abatement issuing from a court of competent jurisdiction pursuant to G.S 153A-123(d) and (e) _ Adopted, this 6th day of December, 1982. The Board of Commissioners for the County of Orange, North Carolina, met in regular session in the Courtroom in Chapel Hill, North Carolina, the regular place of meeting, at 7:30 p.m. on January 18, 1983. Present: Comissioners Lloyd, Marshall, Walker, Whitted and Willhoit Absent: None The Chair announced that this was the hour and day fixed by the Board of Commissioners for the Public Hearing on the Preliminary Assessment Roll filed with the Clerk to the Board of Commissioners of Orange County pursuant to the direction of the Orange County Board of Commissioners and pursuant to the Board's decision to finance the local share of the cost of paving Dumont Drive (S.R. 1595), in Eno Township, Orange County, North Carolina. The Chair also announced that the Board of Commissioners would immediately hear anyone who might wish to be heard on the Preliminary Assessment Roll. No one appeared on the said Preliminary Assessment Roll. Thereupon, upon Motion of Commissioner Willhoit, seconded by Commissioner Marshall and carried, the Preliminary Assessment Roll for the financing by Orange County of the local share of the cost of paving Dumont Drive (S.R. 1595), in Eno Township, Orange County, North Carolina, was confirmed save and except: 1) Orange County Tax Map and Parcel #14-32, owned by John H. McInnis and Lillie McInnis was corrected from assessment of $1,522.49 to $1,315.00 and 2) Orange County Tax Map and Parcel #14-9, corrected from showing Jake Patterson Loy and Gladys Patterson, Route 1, Box 183-D, Hillsborough, N.C. 27278 to read Jack P. Loy and Gladys C. Loy, Box 184-G, Hillsborough, N.C. 27278. The vote upon confirmation of the assessment made against each property owner was: Ayes: Commissioners, Lloyd, Marshall, Walker, Whitted and Willhoit Noes: None Upon motion of Commissioner Willhoit, seconded by Commissioner Marshall and unanimously approved, the Clerk to the Board was directed to enter into the minutes of the Board the confirmation date, hour, and minutes. Thereupon, the Clerk to the Board entered the confirmation effective 7:40 o'clock p.m., the 18th day of January, 1983. Upon motion of Commissioner Willhoit, seconded by Commissioner Marshall and unanimously approved the Clerk to the Board was directed to deliver a copy of the confirmed Assessment Roll to the Orange County Tax Collector. Upon motion of Commissioner Willhoit, seconded by Commissioner Marshall and unanimously approved, the Orange County Tax Collector was directed to publish once, a Notice, no earlier than 20 days from the date of confirmation as herein set forth, that the Assessment Roll for the financing by Orange County of the local share of the cost of paving Dumont Drive (S.R. 1595), located in Eno Township, Orange County, North Carolina, has been confirmed and that assessments may be paid without interest at any time before the expiration of 30 days from the day that the Notice is published and that if not paid within that time, all installments thereof shall bear interest in an amount equal to the interest on past due ad valorem taxes in Orange County. The Chair directed that said Notice shall be published in the Durham Herald Paper. Said Notice shall be in substantially the following form: NOTICE OF CONFIRMATION OF ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR THE FINANCING BY ORANGE COUNTY OF THE LOCAL SHARE OF THE COSTS OF PAVING DUMONT DRIVE (S.R. 1595), LOCATED IN ENO TOWNSHIP, ORANGE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA Notice is hereby given that pursuant to Article 9 of Chapter 153A of the General Statutes of North Carolina, the Commissioners of Orange County have confirmed the Assessment Roll for the financing-by Orange County of the local share of the cost of paving Dumont Drive (S.R. 1595), in Eno Township, Orange County, North Carolina. Adjustments to the Preliminary Assessment Roll were made to the following properties: 1) Orange County Tax Map and Parcel #14-32, owned by John H. McInnis and Lillie McInnis was corrected from assessment of $4522.49 to $1,315.00 and 2) Orange County Tax Map and Parcel #14-9, corrected from showing Jake Patterson Loy and Gladys Patterson, Route 1, Box 183-D, Hillsborough, N.C. 27278 to read Jack P. Loy and Gladys C. Loy, Box 184-G, Hillsborough, N.C. 27278. The specifics of the above adjustments made are in the -minutes of the Orange County Board of Commissioners for its meeting on January 18, 1983. The confirmed Assessment Roll reflects any adjustment. Pursuant thereto: 1. The Board of Commissioners of the County of Orange, North Carolina, met in regular session in the Courtroom in Chapel Hill, North Carolina, at 7:30 p.m. on January 18, 1983. 2. The Chair announced that this was the hour and day fixed by the Board of Commissioners for the Public `Hearing on the Preliminary Assessment Roll pursuant to the Board's decision to finance to local share of the cost of paving, located in Eno Township, Orange County, North Carolina. 3. All persons attending and wishing to be heard were recognized by the Chair and were heard. 4. The Board confirmed the Assessment Roll and directed its delivery to the Orange County Tax Collector. 5. The assessments confirmed by the Board may be paid without interest at any time before the expiration of 30 days from the date of the publication of this Notice. If not paid within this time, all installments thereof shall bear interest at the rate set for past due Orange County ad valorem taxes. John T. Horner, Tax Collector for Orange County, North Carolina I, Paulette Pridgen-Pond, Clerk to the Board of Commissioners for the County of Orange, North Carolina, do hereby certify that the foregoing is a true copy of so much of the proceedings of the Board of Commissioners for said County at a meeting held on January 18, 1983, as relates in any way to the confirmation of the Assessment Roll for the financing by Orange County of the local share of the cost of paving Dumont Drive (S.R. 1595), located in Eno Township, Orange County, North Carolina. Paulette Pridgen-Pond Clerk to the Board of Commissioners of Orange County, North Carolina (SEAL) NOTICE OF CONFIRMATION OF ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR THE FINANCING BY ORANGE COUNTY OF THE LOCAL SHARE OF THE COSTS OF PAVING DUMONT DRIVE (S.R. 1595), LOCATED IN ENO TOWNSHIP, ORANGE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA Notice is hereby given that pursuant to Article 9 of Chapter 153A of the General Statutes of North Carolina, the Commissioners of Orange County have confirmed the Assessment Roll for the financing by Orange County of the local share of the cost of paving Dumont Drive (S.R. 1595), in Eno Township, Orange County, North Carolina. Adjustments to the Preliminary Assessment Roll were made to the following properties: 1) Orange County Tax Map and Parcel #14-32, owned by John H. McInnis and Lillie McInnis was corrected from assessment of $1,522.49 to $1,315.00 and 2) Orange County Tax Map and Parcel #14-9, corrected from showing Jake Patterson Loy and Gladys Patterson, Route 1, Box 183-D, Hillsborough, N.C. 27278 to read Jack P. Loy and Gladys C. Loy, Box 184-G, Hillsborough, N.C. 27278. The specifics of the above adjustments made are in the minutes of the Orange County Board of Commissioners for its meeting on January 18, 1983. The confirmed Assessment Roll reflects any adjustment. Pursuant thereto: 1. The Board of Commissioners of the County of Orange, North Carolina, met in regular session in the Courtroom in Chapel Hill, North Carolina, at 7:30 p.m. on January 18, 1983. 2. The Chair announced thatk this was the hour and day fixed by the Board of Commissioners for the Public Hearing on the Preliminary Assessment Roll pursuant to the Board's decision to finance to local share of the cos~ of paving, located in line Township, Orange County, North Carolina. • r' l 3. All persons attending and wishing to be heard were recognized by the Chair and were heard. 4. The Board confirmed the Assessment Roll and directed its delivery to the Orange County Tax Collector. S. The assessments confirmed by the Board may be paid without interest at any time before the expiration of 30 days from the date of the publication of this Notice. If not paid within this time, all installment; thereof shall bear interest at the rate set for past due Orange County ad valorem taxes. John T. Horner, Tax Collector for Or,inge County, North Carolina Please publish once in the Durham Morning Herald on February 8, 1983 and -end statement along with Proof of publication to Geoffrey E. Gledhill, 110 North Churton Street, Hillsborough, North Carolina 27278. OFMCE COUNTY v BOA1M OF COMMISSIONEFS Action Agenda ACTION AGENDA ITEM A&STRACT Item No. LA MEE71=3 DATE January 18, 1983 Subject: Complaints as to Wild and Vicious Animals Department- Health County Manager I-Public Hearing: yes X no_� . Attachments Information Contact: Yes Health Director - 732-8181 ext. 311 County Manager - 732-8181 ext. 501 Phone Phmiber: PUE20SE: To consider whether to regulate or ban the keeping of such animals in the county. NEED: Various citizens have raised concerns over wild non-domestic, or vicious domestic animals being harbored in the County. The concern is that they are dangerous to persons or property or have the potential of being dangerous to persons or property. Looking just to the recent past, several incidents can be noted. In October complaints were reported over the escape of a bear from a kennel , located near Chanel Hill. In December, the Health Department investigated an incident where a pit bull dog had escaped the owners progerty near Hillsborough and attacked an 18 month old boy inflicting life-threatening injury. in January a boa constrictor escaped its owner in an apartment complex in Chanel Hill. All of these incidents point out insufficient attention by the owners as to what is necessary for security of confine- ment and proper care. The question is whether Board action is necessary to insure health, safety and welfare measures for the public's protection. Present local laws (zoning ordinance, animal control ordinance) do not address these types of animals. The State Wildlife Commission rules only apply to animals which are indigenous to the area. The U.S. Department of Agriculture's regulation apply only to persons interested in securing licenses as a dealer or exhibitor of exotic animals. They do not apply to people who might contend the animals are being kept as personal pets. In regard to kennels,. USDA only inspects once a year. It's response time would be slow in dealing with animal escapes or allegations of inhumane treatment. If Board action is deemed necessary the General Statutes of North Carolina authorize boards of county commissioners to take action. Section 153A-121 permitscounties "to define, regulate, prohibit, or abate acts, omissions, or conditions detrimental: to the Realth, safety or welfare of its citizens and the peace and dinnity of the county". Section 153A-131 permits counties to regulate, restrict or prohibit the possession or harboring of animals which are dangerous to persons or property. Two approaches are attached as exhibits. The Chatham County proposed ordinance describes a regulatory approach whereas one in effect in Wilson County exemplifies a prohibition approach. RECOMMENDATION: As the Board decides. We, the undersigned, hereby petition the Orange County, North Carolina Board of Commissioners to establish an Ordinance prohibiting the harboring of mild animals in Orange County. w NAME ADDRESS .I r I-ILL ef 2L,) ciaiwi 1-t 1Z n �T �• ). A J y1�4 We, the undersigned, hereby petition the Orange Countyq North Carolina Board of Cons issioners to establish an Ordinance prohibiting the harboring of wild animals in Orange County. NAME ADDRESS xl�"� i dpi-a�� ..•�7�;'�-, L���... - (' AL .L 6J Z We, the undersigned, hereby petition the Orange County North Carolina Board of Commissioners to establish an Ordinance prohibiting the harboring of wild animals in Orange County. NAME ADDRESS K. - l i 71 ' J ' L - M1y'7 7 1 , j •'-"Y ice` r� J 7-�, mL 1< I1 ;.`! 1•�/I�JZ _,rJ,,, ��' rr�'�r r 4L _1 j_(.-L, 1J yvu We, the undersigned, hereby petition the Orange Countyl North Carolina Board of Commissioners to establish an Ordinance prohibiting the harboring of wild animals in Orange County. NAME ADDRESS mil" {�^.•� � � :c-.�,�c'f - . I , L? - I _ ��dF• Wei the undersigned, hereby petition the Orange Countyl North Carolina Board of Commissioners to establish an Ordinance prohibiting the harboring of wild animals in Orange County. NAME ADDRESS '7 J t i LL �t t:. :�L i :; 1 .. \L; )' 1 Q0.(• 'l-[? y V, 7 -� �1 �!'•v�';`t /-�.0-:. - ire+ 1 7c i . ✓• � -,cz.., �,� � .,,, .=�^,J; :•,�� ter.4c C ./! .,� w �. ��" `�..• ���'w� ,�' it_•��'c�.!r 4_M.'Y� _ �� .' / �r, � (^.- ., _••� �r-r 1, A l ./. 1 EL Wei the undersigned, hereby petition the Orange Countyp North Carolina Board of Commissioners to establish an Ordinance prohibiting the harboring of wild animals in Orange County. NAME ADDRESS r 1 r r _ r LA �� 1 We, the undersigned, hereby petition the Orange Countyl North Carolina Board of Commissioners to establish an Ordinance prohibiting the harboring of wild animals in Orange County. NAME ADDRESS ^ ` J. 1 i _! 1� r. fy E-77-s We, the undersigned, hereby petition the Orange county, North Carolina Board of Commissioners to establish an Ordinance prohibiting the harboring of wild animals in Orange County. NAME ApDRESS T im G1�,✓. C��iA L l�,/VC CIA r J ✓ T �,�z2�, Ul���v�' ��%'c��:-� �.i � !•a.C�7 �..>'ti�� !��, c d��t�,r Id�cG K _ /• f�C:S !' � '�:/�/�,:��.[.�.4.'-� ,�?`, �,�m�,�✓.c-fir' _ -1-4C Wei the undersigned, hereby petition the Orange Countyl North Carolina Board of Commissioners to establish an Ordinance prohibiting the. harboring of wild animals in Orange County. NAME ADDRESS en .� �.%/'✓�/l�rs 2� � f�.D� ,mss-/C.h! a ezi 6 �•o lr).e G 3� a 375 L.l� ie 22 Z 37 ��.,;'III. �/%I���:(i'=��• � :�a 3 F�- 7 �� X41 We, the undersigned, hereby petition the Orange Countyt North Carolina Board of Commissioners to establish an Ordinance prohibiting the harboring of wild animals in Orange County. NAME ADDRESS C' Si 'Y.rik �1. IZS ld2r3u�c,� �,. OIL � 1 � J _ 7' r'� I lam_. /"k ,- 7; r ' may.,/ •I; _ J ✓� 1 c � rl/ice•-�- .�. - i'., _ `'.� • - We, the undersigned, hereby petition the Orange Countyo North Carolina Board of Commissioners to establish an Ordinance prohibiting the harboring of wild animals -in Orange County. NAME ADDRESS At �C t 0 r(C -2--r y c.: We, the undersigned, hereby petition the Orange County, North Carolina Board of Commissioners to establish an Ordinance prohibiting the harboring of wild animals in Orange County. NAME ADDRESS n 7 n r a4 We, the undersigned, hereby petition the Orange County) North Carolina Board of Commissioners to establish an Ordinance prohibiting the harboring of wild animals in Orange County. NAME ADDRESS /�2 3 ��Sr + 4r, We, the undersigned, hereby petition the Orange County, North Carolina Board Of Commissioners to establish an Ordinance prohibiting the harboring of wild animals in Orange County. NAME ADDRESS 7z C //�4 - f=5 op ma: COUNTY 4 G BaFM OF MMMISSIOZOMPS Action Agen& ACTION AMM rtEM P13,STF411= Item No.a�- p�, maj January 18, 1983 Subject: Section 8 Housing oepa -tment; Cuutity Manager Public Hewing: yes X�no: Attachtn<nt.s information Contact: County Manager's Office phone fir: 732-8181 ext. 501 PUF20SE: For the Board to approve an agreement between the County and the Chapel Hill Housing Authority for the administration by the Authority of the Section 8 Existing Housing Program and the Section 8 Moderate Rehabilitation Program. N== At its 'November 22, 1982 meeting, the County Board of Commissioners moved to contract with the Authority to administer the Section 8 Housing Programs for the period January 1, 1983 through December 31 , 1983. Since that meeting, County staff has updated and revised the previously existing contract. The updated contract was approved by the Housing Authority Board at its January 11, 1983 meeting. INPACP: Some features of the contract are: - Submission by the Authority to the County of monthly financial reports of receipts and disbursements Vesting,of authority in the County Board of Commissioners to approve any amendments to the budgets of the Section 8 programs - Requirement that the Authority inventory all fixed assets acquired with Orange County Housing Assistance Payments Program Funds - Submission by the Authority to the County of copies of all correspondence with the U. S. Department of HUD pertaining to Section 8 60 days termination, clause - Requirement that the Housing Authority comply with provisions of the Local Government Budget and Fiscal Control Act RECOMMENDATION: As the Board decides. a4i MAIZE.CaMY BOAAM Cr-- CMUSSIOVnS Action Ps1_nda.) ACTION AMCA IMI ABsnm= Item r o. �p MEEMM, DATE January 18, 1983 Subject: AUDIT CONTRACT--1982-83 Departent: Finance Hearing: es Attachment(s): 1x fo=tion Contact: Wallace Harding AUDIT CONTRACT • Ply._ Phanber: 732-8181 pUgppSE; To contract with the accounting firm of Touche, Ross & Co, for the second year per our request for proposal. Ate: General Statute 159-34 requires each local government to have its accounts audited annually by an independent auditor. Attachment P'af OMBA-102 requires an organization-wide single audit of all federal grants. Benefits to the County of a single audit are as follows: 1) The organization-wide audit of grants will provide substantial benefits in the form of efficiencies and economies in comparison to the grant- by-grant approach. The principal benefit -is that no further federal audit requirements will be imposed. 2) The audit of all federal and state programs at a common date should minimize the interruption of normal operations. 3) The time required of Finance and other department personnel assigned to work with auditors generally will be reduced. 4) The cost of conducting an organization-wide audit can be charged against the grants. IMPACT: The financial audit contract is for the agreed upon second year price of $22,100. The Federal Government requires that a single audit be done for all grant funds, therefore, this audit has been included at a cost of $9,200. The $9,200 expenditure will be charged to the grants that are being audited and will result in complete recovery for the County. RECOMMENDATION: Approve attached contract. �46 0Rm-7GE axi-LTV BaZUTU CF Ca^11ISSIOV&'%S Action Agee a Itam, Ido.� . ACTION ;E .:%T 1=1 �.sTTe`ZCT rL k'TLCG ERTE January 1$, 1983 Subject: Budget Amendments PpbLi.0 Hearing: yes —.L—p ft4: Finance p taCYuttent(s): yes SnfO=EB:•-jon tact: Patricia Stutts Phan-°. Dhank�2s: Ext. 495 pCRP05E. To consider budget amendment Community Development D®: To provide funds to cover personnel costs during interim period between termination of 1982 funds and release of 1983 funds. IMPACT: No additional county funds are required. RECOMMENDATION: Approval ORANGE COUNTY PROPOSED COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 1980-81 PROJECT ORDINANCE AMENDMENT The 1980-81 Project Ordinance of Orange County as adapted on December 1, 1980, and subsequently amended, is hereby amended as follows: Appropriation: Community Development III Administration - Personnel $ (3,168-) .Rehabilitation - Personnel (4,691.) Contingencies 7,859- To transfer back to contingencies, funds used for personnel costs as per instructions from HUD. Appropration: Community Development II Ad-ministration - Personnel $ 1,073. - Operating (7,954•). - Capital (1,013,) Rehabilitation - Personnel_ 7,894• To provide funds from unspent Community Development II .funds to cover the cost of personnel and fringe incurred between termination 'of CD III hinds and F/Y 1983 CD funds release as per HUD suggestions. Adopted this day of , 1983. OpuzeZE com= 7�' BOARD c7-- caMisS20, Action Panda 6 zt�'n Na.�O AC-01CM AGE-Vok Tr='l FZ'T""CC b1 nZG D.NTr January 18, 1983 S,ibject- Housing Rehabilitation Contract Award Public Fl2�xixig= 2:s:: X no : Community Develo ment Attacl�m�t(s)- Erie o �On COn��' Wi 1 bert McAdoo Bid Results �= 732-8181 Ext. 429 PUMIose: Award of three Housing Rehabilitation Contracts. NEed; Sealed bids were received and opened on November 16, 1982. Attached is a tabulation of the bids 'by dwelling unit numbers. zTPzct: Award of contract to the lowest bidder will be consistent with present housing rehabilitation bid procedure. vmcoarn?n:?ation(s) DUn Street Contractor Bid Amount 29 Torain Street Taylor Home Improvement 8,010.00 29A Torain Street Taylor Home Improvement 8,115.00 35 Torain Street Eugene Morrow 7,148.00 RESULTS OF BID OPENING OWNER: Bryant Roberts APPLICATION NUPIBER 35 �ODRESS: D.U. 35 Torain Street COST ESTIMATE: 6,395.00 =ERCENTAGE OF BID OVER 10.54 UNDER ____ COST ESTIMATE C�{rCK ONE: JOB BID I_ X JOB NEGOTIATED COMPANY B I D ANOUN T Eugene Morrow _-7_,.1 4�8.0 0 -- Taylor Home Improvement 7.220 — Gates Construction 8,365-00 Bids opened by: Robert Wilson Time of Bid Opening: 3:00 p.m. Date of Bid Opening: November 16 1982 Witnessed by: Wilbert McAdoo Lowest Acceptable Bid: 7,148.00 ',agotiated Amount: �— NSA --- --- Contractor: Eugene Morrow _ NAME Rt. 2 Box 394 Mebane, N.C. 2_7302 ADDRESS 563-3023 PHONE NUMBER COMMENTS: Community Development's contribution towards the rehabilitation of this dwelling unit will be 46,000.00. Submitted by: DATE: C L '– Bid Approved by: Proceed Order: Issued �' NoL Issued ����•U�ic�7T5: I RESULTS OF BID OPENING APPLICATION NUMBER 29 OWNER; Bryant Roberts COST ESTIMATE: 8,949.00 ADDRESS: D.U. 29 Torain Street UNDER 10.50 COST ESTIMATE :ERCENTAGE OF BID OVER CHECK ONE: JOB BID JOB NEGOTIATED BID AMOUNT COMPANY Eugene Morrow Taylor Home Improvement 8 010.0 3• . Gates Construction Bids opened by: Robert Wilson Time of Bid Opening: 3:00 m• Date of Bid Opening: Nobember 16 1982 Witnessed by: Wilbert McAdoo ' *****+Y***#Y*+•k*+4*#**-1*#*x#**�/x++x+*Y#***+ir*#**#Y**Y*#*****Y*i'-r**i:x#*A•++-kx#Y#+'** Lowest Acceptable Bid: 8,010.00 egotiated Amount: N/A Contractor: Taylor Home Im rovement NAME 1156 Fiske Street Durham N. . ADDRESS 688-3214 PHONE NUMBER - COMMENTS: Community Development's contribution towards the rehabilitation of this dwelling unit will be $6,000.00. DATE: Submitted by: / Bid Approved by: Proceed Order: Issued I J Not Issued COMMENTS: out D — v [, W RESULTS OF BID OPENING wNER: Bryant Roberts APPLICATION NUMBER I 29A -DDRESS: D.U. 29A Torain S resat COST ESTIMATE:--8,93g-nn =EaCENTAGE OF BID OVER_ UNDER 9.13 COST ESTIMATE :HECK ONE: JOB BID JOB NEGOTIATED I� COMPANY BID AMOUNT Eugene Morrow _-9118-OD---- Taylor Home Improvement 3_ Gates Construction 9,865.00 Bids opened by: Robert Wilson Time of Bid Opening: 3:00 Date of Bid Opening: November 16 Witnessed by: Wilbert McAdoo _lwest Acceptable Bid: 8,115.00 "n otiated Amount: N/A Contractor: Taylor Home Im rov m NAME 1156 Fiske Street Durham, N.C. ADORE 6883214 PHONE NUMBER COMMENTS: Community Development's contribution towards the rehabilitation of this dwelling unit will be $6,000.00. 4 Submitted by: 7 —DATE: �~ J aid Approved by: Proceed Order: Issued ( Not Issued COMMENTS: Bmm OF anvasslamll- Action Agenda. ACTION AGEMA IM ABSMCF item No- MEEMC DATE January 24, 1983 Subject: Parcel Identification Number Index t• Register of Deeds V Public Hearing: es no At t s Infoxmat�on Contact: Yes Betty June Hayes Phone Number: 732-8181 ext.366 PUMICSE: To consider seeking a local act from the General Assembly to institute the index prior to July 1, 1983. NEED: Records within the Register of Deeds Office are indexed according to alphabetic listing of owners. Since 1980 a new index by property inden- tification number has been under development. In December 1982, the Department of Administration certified that the new index met the require- ments of State law and thereby could become the recognized official index as of July 1 , 1983, unless a local act movinn up the data were approved. The Register of Deeds desires to have an earlier approval date since the index is ready and since a cost saving could result. Currently, it takes 3.5 boxes of naner or $77 per month and 18 hours of computer time for the multiple printing of the alphabetic index. This could be discontinued once the computer is utilized for retrival. Representatives Anne C. Barnes and Joe Hackney are willing to carry a local act through the process for approval if the Board makes known its request for action. Authority to utilize the PIN index could become effective as of, February 1, 1983, given this oo ahead. Orange County's index would be the first of its kind in the State to receive official status. RECOMMENDATION(S): A9prove request for local legislation.