HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes - 19820426U~`35t3
`! ~~~~
¢-..
APRIL, 26, 1982
The Orange County Board of C~anissioners met in re9u]-ar session an Monday,
April 26, 1982, at 7:30 P.M. in. the Oa~remissianers' 1~otn, ~~ge ~mty ~~`
house, Hillsborough, North Carolina. -
Conmissioners resent: ri,_-;_,~*,^an R.iChard E. TnIlzitted, and Cbmnissioners Norm
C,~istaveson, Shirley E. Marshall, Nornr'1n WallcYr and Don Willhait.
A. Board Oasmients:
Oa~missicsier Willhoit asked about the Awxil;r~ for response to the (axe Creek
Envaxorunexital Impact Statement and the Oaunty's plans for such resp~se. Staff .
told ~issioner Willhoit that the Cane Greek EIS was scheduled for tY~ May,3rd
agenda and that Plarnzing Staff response was available now if the Board desired i.t.
Ccnmi_ssioner Wa7acex added-an item about the possibility of a local nrr7~nane~c?
prohibiting spotlighting of deer.
B. Audience CaRnents:
There were none.
C. Items For Decision By Board:
1. Addition of Chesidy Gircle in Oak Hills Subdivisicsi to the State maintained
system. Oa~gnissioner Marshall moved to appresve, seamded .by Conmi.ssicsier WilJhozt:,
the addition of (hesidy Circle to the State Seoondary Road System. Vote: Ayes,
5; nees, 0.
2. Public Hearing date far naro;ng Of State and n~-State maintained xx~ads.
7.'he Board set May 18, 1982, aS the date far the pub?-ic hearing an the State and
non--State maintained roads.
3. Resolution supporting passage of Statewide Ref?~°e_~?d+~+ on Clean Water Bonds.
Oartmd.ssiomer WiLlhoit moved, seconded by Cknmuissier~r Marshall, to adopt the
Resolution supporting passage of the Statewide referendum on Clean Water Bonds
(That Resolutiann is on page of this book.) During discussion, 0~-~~~~er •.-
Willhoi.t said that awaxding of Clean Water Bond money should not be contingent
upal-- obtaining other sources of funding; that there should be no "strings" on
the source of matching funds far Clean Water Bond money. There was a cronsensus
of the Board to include a statlt to this effect in the letter of t~n~+;ttal
to Triangle J Wuncil of Gav?rn~ts. Vote: Ayes, 5; noes, 0.
(6~t~3~7
;~.,
.. y
A . P.dded ztem--Discussion of a local ordinance to prohi}ait the spotlighting
of deer. C~n¢nissioner Walker had a copy of an ordinance which had been passed
and applied to thirty-eight counties in North Carolina prohibiting the spot-
lighting of deer between certain hours. Qastmi-ssionax Gustaveson moved, secarided
by Ca~enission~s Walker, to refer this ordinanoe to the County Attorney far his
opinion and if it was a matter of getting orange County added to the list of
thirty~ight counties already under the orcL^anae that the Attorney should be
in contact with our Legislators to acc~nplish same. Vote: Ayes, 5; noes, U.
There being no furth~s business to caane before the Board, it adjourned by
consensus.
Richard E. F~,itted, Chair
Paulette Pridgen-Pond, Clerk