HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda - 08-30-2000 - 1ORANGE COUNTY
BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
ACTION AGENDA ITEM ABSTRACT
Meeting Date: August 30, 2000
Action Agenda
Item No. 1
SUBJECT• Construction and Demolition Waste Recycling Task Force Report
DEPARTMENT: Solid Waste Management
PUBLIC HEARING: (YIN) No
ATTACHMENT(S):
8/24/00 Staff Memo
C&D Recycling Task Force Report
(distributed at 8/15/00 BOCC meeting)
INFORMATION CONTACT:
Gayle Wilson, Solid Waste Management
Director, 968-2885,
awilson(cr~.co.orange. nc.us
Blair Pollock, .968-2788,
bpollock(p~co.orange.nc.us
TELEPHONE NUMBERS:
Hillsborough 732-8181
Chapel Hill 968-4501
Durham 688-7331
Mebane 336-227-2031
PURPOSE: To review and discuss the final report from the Construction and Demolition (C&D)
Waste Recycling Task Force.
BACKGROUND: In November 1999, the BOCC appointed a citizen task force to develop
recommendations for improving management of C&D waste that would observe the following
principles:
• Promote and encourage the `3Rs' hierarchy -reduce, reuse, recycle -for C&D waste
management.
• Promote and encourage pre-generation alternatives such as development of C&D waste
plans, building permit provisions, surety bonds or up front fees, education, etc.
• Promote, encourage and/or require early separation of reusable and/or recyclable materials.
The C&D Recycling Task Force met from December 1999 through May 2000. They developed
a report and submitted it to the BOCC on August 15, 2000 with detailed recommendations for
recycling and reducing C&D waste in Orange County. Staff recommends that the Board
discuss the findings and recommendations reflected in the task force report and provide
direction that the staff will develop into a detailed implementation plan for subsequent review
and approval by the BOCC.
FINANCIAL IMPACT: There is no direct financial impart associated with the review and
discussion of the task force report itself, but the financial impact of implementing the
"'~'.ommendations could be significant. That would include at least a new position related to
nentation of a proposed mandatory C&D separation ordinance for Orange County (see
2
Attachment B to the report for position details and costs). Additionally, the impact could also
include the costs of development of a mixed C&D recycling facility and site. The estimated
financial impact of C&D task force recommendations can be refined as part of the Manager's
recommended implementation plan.
RECOMMENDATION(S): The Manager recommends that the Board discuss the task force
recommendations and provide direction to the Manager and staff regarding a C&D waste
management implementation plan to include: timeline; cost analysis; budget; staffing;
equipment needs; and estimated impact on the C&D waste stream.
MEMORANDUM
To: John Link, County Manager
From: Gayle Wilson, Solid Waste Management Director
Subject: Construction and Demolition Waste Recycling Task Force Report
Date: August 24, 2000
At their August 15, 2000 meeting, the BOCC received a copy of the Construction and
Demolition Waste Recycling Task Force report. The report contained:
• a set of principles
• a history of the task force meetings
• a summary of recommendations
• details of those recommendations, and
• appended background materials on C&D recycling
The report did not include an action plan or set priorities for the recommendations.
The set of eleven specific recommendations included:
• mandating separation of C&D waste for recycling
• adoption of policies to implement the separation program
• finding a location for C&D management
• hiring a second recycling educator to focus on C&D
• pursuing C&D recycling partnerships
• diversion of inert debris
• consideration of a used building materials retail center
• addressing UNC C&D recycling possibilities
• conducting acounty-wide-survey of abandoned mobile homes
• promoting green building and deconstruction
• urging implementation during the 2000-2001 fiscal year
Action on some or all of these recommendations would involve a significant potential workload
for Commissioners and staff. Given the extensive work carried out by this citizen task force, the
potentially positive impacts that some of their recommendations could have on reducing the
C&D waste stream, and the limited capacity remaining at Orange County's C&D landfill, I
believe it would be fruitful and expedient for the BOCC to provide direction to staff at the August
30 work session regarding the Board's interest in and priorities for implementing
recommendations in the Task Force report.
I would recommend that we refrain from referring the Task Force report to the Solid Waste
Advisory Board for a number of reasons:
• the SWAB has an extensive workload of other pressing solid waste matters that need
their attention;
there has already been substantial, diverse citizen input into the development of C&D
waste management recommendations through this task force process;
4
• several of the C&D Task Force members are likewise members of the SWAB and
accordingly have already provided some SWAB input into the process; and
• time is of the essence in moving forward with action steps that may lengthen (even if only
briefly) the life of the existing C&D landfill and in resolving the County's plans for
managing C&D waste after that landfill closes.
However, I do believe it would be valuable to circulate the recommended implementation plan
for future C&D waste management to both SWAB and C&D Task Force members for their
comments, prior to the Manager's distributing it to the BOCC for formal approval this fall.
The current C&D landfill has only about 18 months of life left and any effective recycling
program that involves processing or storage of materials cannot be practically and cost-
effectively initiated at the current location atop the disposal unit. Thus, a new location is likely
needed for both C&D recycling and disposal. Development of a new location that could
accommodate recycling and/or disposal is expected to take at least a year. Action by the BOCC
early this fall could greatly improve the chances of securing a site and making it operational by
the time the current C&D landfill area is full, sometime in early 2002.