Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes - 198107071. z. ~. 4• s• 6. 7. 8. 9. l'0. Ll. '.2. .3. .la.. .5. .6. 7. S. ~J. Oe 2. 3• ~• 5. ~. 7. 3. 3. ). i f ..i o ,. ~~ e JULY 7, 1981 -psi . ~- _~~: 77~e Grange County Board of Cctimissioners met in special session with the Orange County Planning Board Tuesday, July 7, 1981, at 7:30 P.M. Grange County Courthouse, Superior Courtroan, Hillsborough, North Carolina. Cca~missioners present: Crnmissioner Anne Barnes, Chair, and Come missioners Norman Gus-k~veson, Nornr~n Wa].]sar, Richard [omitted and Don Willhoit. Planning Board Membezs present: Ms. Pat Crawford, Chair,and Art Cleary, Ms. Alice Gordon, Ms. Claudine Barris, Mr. zAgan Irvin, Mr. Steve Kizer, Ms. Nancy Laszlo, Ms. Hazel Lansford, Mr. David Shanklin, and Mr. John Wilson. Co:~unissianQS Barnes operned the meeting and ainlounced. the purpose . of the joint meeting was to have a public hearing ~ the proposed 7.oxiing Grdinance, Land Use Plan and Zoning Atlas. Before she turned the meeting over to Ms. Crawford, Commissioner Barnes noted that the Boattl of Commissioners needed to appoint a Tax Supervisor and Tax Collector for Orange County. Agenda Item 1: P~~intmant of Tax Collector and Tax S~tlxrv?--e;or- - CamLissioner Whined moved to reappoint Mr. William T. haws Tax Supervisor of Orange County for a tear of two years, in compliance with the Machinery Act; Comni.ssioner Wa.]ker seconded the motion. Vote: Ayes 5; noes, 0. Cc~amissioner TnIlzitted moved to. reappoint Mr. John Horner Tax Collector of Orange County fora Lean of one jr'eax; Oa¢~missioner Walker seoonded the moti~. Vote: Ayes, 5; noes, 0. The Clerk of Court, Mr. Frank Fxederi.ck, achnini.stered the oaths of office to Messrs. Horner and Laws. Copies of the oaths of office axe on pages 3Pa-,3Q~ in this book. Ae~ra~nda rtem 2: Public Daring: 7~onin~ Qrdinance, Land Use Plan and Zcaiuz Atlas . Caimi.ssicmer RarnpG turned the meeting over t0 the Q1ai_r of the Planning Board, Ms. Pat Crawford, who px~oaeeded to anruxm~ the purpose of the hearing and the order of consideration. Ms. Crawford said that the ~. 29 a. :.._ . ~ ~, 3"• 4. s. 6. 7. 8. 9. 0. 1. 2. 3• 4. S. b. 7. 8. 0 Q a 1. 2. ~• 1~. ~. b. 7. 8. 9. 0. 1. 2. 3. ZF • 5. 6. 7. 8, Land Use Plan portion of this public hearing was a cca~tinuatian of a public hearing held on June 4, 19$1, and asked that those persons com- menting on that portion cca~fine their remarks to areas which had nat been addressed at the first public hearing. Mr. Jim Pvlatty, Planning Director, reviewed the Land Use Plan in detail. Ms. Crawford called for public tents, asking those who wished to speak to cones to the front of the roan and idemti~~ themselves to make their cam~lts. Land Use Plan Ca[ments Paula Bree--Lives ai SR 1948; void her c~~rn over the propassed airport developmsnt. She feels the agricultural aspect of the land should be protected. She was also ~ncerned over the impact such airport develop- mant might have on the water quality and transportation patterns in the area targeted for the development. John Payne--Representing the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill: He spoke for the health px~gram at the University, saying they used five airplanes and made an average of one flight px day for the health pro- gram. Mr. Payne said the health program serviced clinics over the entice State. Fie said the University was ~,tprn~ for adequate safety and physical, fii-anAarrl~ at an airport which might serve its needs. Mr. Kizer asked Mr. Payne i.f Duke University used the Horace 'nilliams Aixpvrt. ~Ir. Payne replied. yes. Mr. Shanklin asked about the distance fran the University such an airport might be located. Mr. Payne said it was a "difficult question" but he guessed about ten miles. Cc~ti.ssioners GUstaveson and Barnes asked Nh•. Payne the percentage. of flights associated with the health program and if the University plann- ed to phase out the Floras Williams Airport. Mr. Payne rcplie~l about 5~ and yes, the Chancellor had indicated it would ]~: phased out by the late 1980'x. Dan Fdelmar_, Bingham township: Fie said the last paragraph in the Land Use Plan, page 152, should be deleted. .Stanley Bennett: Route 5, Chapel Hill: Indicated his support for the Land Use Plan. He said the Horace Williams Airport was sufficient for 9. .0 . ,, ,. e 29~ ___:; the needs of the University. He felt the pzaposed Mi-dwaY Aix'Port and the associated Industrial Park were not in the public interest. Barry Jacobs--~lapk~ 'Ibwilship: He feels the airport issue deserves further public clisaassian. Macy Penta--Halifax Road. lapel Hill: A professiana7. health •care deliverer who uses the Horace Williams Airport.. She is opposed to in use of the Horace Williams Airport and feels another site should be considered for hemmer air traffic use. 'his ooncludsd the cat[t~nts of the public oa the Land Use Plan. Mr. Polatty reviewed the Zoning Atlas and Zoning Oxt3inance, ex^ plaining both. Ms. Crawford called for cc~aztS ~1 the Zoning Atlas. Zoning Atlas CCrlments Jim gay-gaute 4, Hillsborough: SR~sti~edwhlr 2.2.3 had been chariged~, ~„~.,,; ng mernbersh_ip; and said he felt those townships which were un- affected should not have equal representation on the Planning Board. Ccs~nissi:oner Walke.X discussed the difficulties in getting a re- presentative fran Little River Township on th~ Planning Board. - Mr.. Ki2er said that Planning Boatod thisilci-ng had• }peen 'to have enough repre_~tation from each township to identify local Planning problems.. Mr. Irvin said he had felt that those townships which wise excluded frGm the Land Use Plan should not be represented on the Planning Beard. Mr. Wilson noted that the Planning Board had been divided on this issue. Ca~missioRler td~.itted said he felt the point Mr. Ray was making was that those persons living inside incorporated areas which would not be affected by the Zoning Ozdinance wire not excluded from serving•on the Plann.>.ng Eoaxd. Mr. Cyrus Hague An Attorney represent-ing Mr. James Freeland: pro- tested the proposed zing of Old Ntmber 10 as residential; He asked that it be zoned I-3. He said the land doesn't perk and there's no water and sewer service. MS. I17Y1Sfoxd said it was a question of the desirability of certain types of develog~zt next door to a hrtmeaa~.er. 1. ~~4 . 3• 4~ Nlr. Paul Separk-~:hesh,ise Drive, Hillsborough: He said there ~~ wire ccannercial c-xitexprises in this axea already. 6. Mr. Calvin Arefozrl-Cheshire Drive, Hillsborough: Is part owner 7~ of one of the rcial areas; he felt he had the right to make use of 9. his property just as the hanecwner thouc~'it he could use his respective 9. pxoperty.as he desired. He listed the things his occ~any had done to ~. prese~.-ve the pxivacy of the residents in the area, such as a buffer zone . 1. and na entrances or windows at the arci.al enterprise facing the re- silents. 3• Ms. Ltimsford noted the problem of traffic in the area. +~ Mr. Areford re lied that with his p property listed non-oociforming ~. he would be unable to sell it. ~. Mr. Alois Callemyn, Surveyor: said the area will lose a valuable 1. tax base if the land is not zoned o?~**prcial; he said it will not perk. 3. 'This concluded the oam~ents on the Zar:ing Atlas . 3. Conmissioner Barnes told the Planning Board. she had received sane ), mail which supported rnsidential/agricultural zoning for Binc~am Township and she wished td give it to the Clerk to he made part of the record of _> the public hearing, as ~-~+~~*~ by the letter writers. (Copies of these 3. letters are on pages ~a-~3 of this book.) she also introduced a letter ~• from the Hello Teer Ccunpany asking that its asphalt plant on Bethel Chuxrrh ~. Read be zed industrial and therefore in oompliarice with the zoning ordinance. ,. This concluded the ca~rents on the 7,cming Atlas. ~o ihs . Crawford called for C].ts on the 7rm i ng Atlas ; there wire none. ~~ Ms. Crawford called fox general cce~ents. Ms. Josephine 8arborsr, Hillsborough: Queried whether or not the Plan- ring Board was accepting written tents and fox how long? Ms. Crawford replied it onuld depend en the a~-+.~on the Planning Board took tonight. 0 Ms. Rarhn,~r then asked if a cost analysis had been done on the zon- ing ordinance and if that land whose use was restricted would autamatioally have its taxes reduced? she suggested that those areas designated for public use be required to have an enva.rontnental impact assessment done. 0 S'~F;• 29L r~~: ,:; - ~~_... Mr. Stanley Bennett: Said a zoning ordinance could ham beneficial effects on property values; he said the general effect. of such an ordinance would be to protect property values. Mr. Jacobs: Asked how the decision to exclude sore ~nnzships was made? Ms. Crawford respoa~ded, "Political pressure." Mr. Jacobs: Sait he felt the general impact of a Tanr7 Use Plan would be to protect property and he felt the decision to exclude some townships should be rec~sidered. Mr. Shanklin said he was welcraxie to the Qr?eks lbwnship Advisory Council meetings. Mr. Jacobs thanked him for the invitatica~. Ms. Crawford t1~.nked those who had spoken tonight and returned the meeting t0 Commissioner Barnes. Commissioner Barnes thanked the Plarming Board and referred the doc~ntients bacac to the Planning Board. Ca~anissianex Barnes then declared the joint meeting between the F3oard of Commissioners and the Planning Board of Orange County adjourned. Anne Barnes, Chair Paulette Pridgen-Fond, Clerk