HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes - 199512041
APPROVED 2/12/96
SPECIAL MEETING
ORANGE COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
MONDAY, DECEMBER 4, 1995
5:30 P.M.
The Orange County Board of Commissioners met in special session on Monday, December 4,
1995 at 5:30 p.m. for the purpose of receiving information on Welfare Reform and its impact on
families and children in Orange County.
COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENT: Chair Moses Carey, Jr., and Commissioners William L.
Crowther, Stephen H. Halkiotis and Don Willhoit.
COUNTY COMMISSIONER ABSENT: Commissioner Alice M. Gordon
COUNTY ATTORNEY PRESENT: Geoffrey Gledhill
STAFF PRESENT: County Manager John M. Link, Jr., Assistant County Manager Albert Kittrell and
Clerk to the Board Beverly A. Blythe (All other staff members will be recognized appropriately below)
NOTE: All documents referred to in these minutes are in the permanent agenda file in the
Clerk's Office
INTRODUCTORY REMARKS
Social Services Director Marti Pryor-Cook said that she is not sure about the timeline for the
welfare Work First program. She is preparing her staff for what they feel is going to be the impact of
this plan.
Jan Schopler, Chair of the Social Services Board, thanked the County Commissioners for this
opportunity to present information on what they see as the impact of funding cuts on young children
and their families. She said that while they don't know the specifics of welfare reform, they do know
the direction it is going and feel the community needs to be involved in working out the specifics for
welfare reform. She introduced the other members of the Social Services Board. They are Rutha
Brooks, Phil Cook, and Bill Crowther.
PROFILE OF RECIPIENT POPULATION
Gwen Price summarized and compared the profile of recipient population in Orange County
to that of North Carolina. This included AFDC, Medicaid, S/CSA and Food Stamps. She noted that
there will be a large impact upon the AFDC population with the implementation of the Governor's
new Work First program. With regard to Aid to Families with Dependent Children in Orange
County, the average household size is 2.32 and the average payment is $223.36. The average
monthly number of recipients is 1,990 and the average monthly number of cases is 858. The
average duration of payments is 16 months. In Orange County 83.6% of the recipients are high
school graduates which is higher than the state 70%. She continued with the age and race
breakdown of the AFDC recipients. With regard to the JOBS program, Orange County has 267
active participants. It is projected that the Work First participants will increase this number to more
than 600 in 1996 and 1100 in 1997. Gwen Price continued with some AFDC recipient profiles.
OVERVIEW OF MAJOR CHANGES
Marti Pryor-Cook stated that the NC Association of County Directors of Social Services
supports a welfare reform program that will help people move from welfare to work, strengthen
2
families through work and promote personal responsibility, however, they want to ensure that the
program keeps children safe and fosters family stability.
Marti Pryor-Cook emphasized that welfare reform means that there will be major changes in
how Social Services are administered in this Country. One of her challenges is to look at how they
function as an agency, a community and a government. It requires a different way of looking at
things which is the real challenge.
Marti Pryor-Cook gave an overview of the NC House Plan (HB 5) for welfare reform and also
the Governor Hunt/Senate Bill (SB 35). This information is in the permanent agenda file in the
Clerk's office. She listed the °Carrots" of each plan and the impacts of each plan. She noted that a
crisis in Medicaid could be imminent. The House bill would only permit Medicaid growth of 15
percent for the period between October 1, 1994 and October 1, 1996 whereas North Carolina
Medicaid has grown by 23 percent in half that time.
IMPLICATIONS FOR FAMILIES AND CHILDREN
John Walker noted that with welfare reform there is a need to develop new ways of doing
business. Collaboration will be needed in order to achieve the outcome they desire. Their focus
must be on what they hope to achieve from the programs they can afford to offer. Collaboration is
vital to the outcome. People who have talent, experience and resources must be brought together
for the purpose of achieving something they cannot achieve by themselves. Welfare Reform is too
big to be taken on by only a few people. The process must include people bringing whatever
resources they have to the table.
Michele Rivest, Executive Director of the Orange County Partnership for Young Children,
(Smart Start) summarized the funding cuts for young children and their families. She said that block
grant reductions and restructuring are likely to have significant negative impact on the lives of young
children and their families in Orange County and North Carolina. Young children are likely to
experience multiple impacts, and will be hit hardest in the areas of child care, child safety and child
health. She feels that emphasis for priority services must be placed on programs and services that
achieve measurable outcomes for young children and their families.
OPPORTUNITIES FOR SERVICE DELIVERY
Marti Pryor-Cook talked about opportunities for collaboration. She said that there are many
changes in how they do business which presents many challenges to her and her staff.
NEXT STEPS/COMMENTS
Commissioner Crowther, member of the DSS Board, thanked everyone for their participation
in this presentation. He feels that the information will help the County Commissioners to set goals
for this coming year. He emphasized the importance of being ready to implement the changes in
service delivery when the state and the Federal Government finalize their bills. By being prepared, it
will help the Board to plan the budget for next year. He feels it is very important to find out what the
community wants as the outcome from welfare reform. He suggested setting up a 90-day task force
to pull in all the stakeholders in this process to address what needs to happen in order to address
what is necessary to reach the desired outcome in Orange County. He asked that the County
Commissioners help in this process.
Commissioner Halkiotis said that the information presented is really depressing. The needs
are real and he supports a committee to work on addressing what will be necessary to reach the
desired outcomes of the community.
Commissioner Willhoit suggests that the services currently provided by DSS need to be listed
in priority order, starting with mandated services. This will help in determining how to apply available
funds. He would also like an estimate of the reduction in administrative workload if the client
population is reduced as the result of changes in eligibility requirements.
Marti Pryor-Cook said that the time saved with simplified forms will give her staff adequate
time to do the people work that will be required of welfare reform. Within her department, she is
looking at major reorganization and training needs for her staff.
Commissioner Willhoit asked if there were any models in terms of impact on the organization
and if there could be a shift of funds that are now going for administration.
John Link said that everyone will have to do their own model. The County should approach
welfare reform as a social tornado or hurricane. It is a matter of pushing the state in terms of giving
the local counties as much latitude as possible. He supports the idea of a short term task force using
the people resources in Orange County .
It was the consensus of the Board that a charge and composition for this task force will be on
the first agenda in January for Board consideration.
ADJOURNMENT
With no further comments, this special meeting was adjourned. The next regular meeting of
the County Commissioners is scheduled for December 4, 1995 at 7:30 p.m. in the courtroom of the
Old County Courthouse in Hillsborough, North Carolina.
Moses Carey, Chair
Beverly A. Blythe, Clerk
APPROVED 2/12/96
1
MINUTES
ORANGE COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
Regular Meeting
December 4, 1995
The Orange County Board of Commissioners met on Monday, December 4, 1995 at 7:30
p. m. in the courtroom of the Old County Courthouse in Hillsborough, North Carolina.
COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENT: Chair Carey, and Commissioners William L.
Crowther, Alice M. Gordon, Stephen H. Halkiotis and Don Willhoit.
COUNTY ATTORNEY PRESENT: Geoffrey Gledhill
COUNTY STAFF PRESENT: County Manager John M. Link, Jr., Assistant County
Managers Rod Visser and Albert Kittrell and Clerk to the Board Beverly A. Blythe (all other staff
members will be identified appropriately below)
NOTE: ALL BACKGROUND INFORMATION ON ALL ITEMS REFERRED TO IN THESE M{NOTES IS IN
THE PERMANENT AGENDA FILE IN THE CLERK'S OFFICE
I. ADDITIONS OR CHANGES TO THE AGENDA -NONE
II. AUDIENCE COMMENTS
A. MATTERS ON THE PRINTED AGENDA
Chair Carey announced that anyone who would like to speak to an item on the printed
agenda will be recognized at the appropriate time.
B. MATTERS NOT ON THE PRINTED AGENDA -NONE
PUBLIC CHARGE
Chair Carey dispensed with the reading of the public charge.
A. BOARD ORGANIZATION
1. Election of Chair and Vice Chair
Chair Carey was elected Chair until the first meeting in December, 1996. The vote was
unanimous. Commissioner Halkiotis was elected Vice-Chair until the first meeting in December,
1996. The vote was Commissioner Halkiotis -four votes and Commissioner Gordon -one vote.
2. Designation of Voting Delegate for all NCACC and NACo meetings for calendar
year December 1, 1995-1996
A motion was made by Commissioner Gordon, seconded by Commissioner Halkiotis to
designate Commissioner Willhoit as the voting delegate for all NCACC and NACo meetings for the
next twelve months beginning December 1, 1995.
VOTE: UNANIMOUS
B. APPOINTMENTS
1. Manager
A motion was made by Commissioner Gordon, seconded by Commissioner Crowther to
appoint John M. Link, Jr. as County Manager.
VOTE: UNANIMOUS
2
2. Clerk to the Board
A motion was made by Commissioner Halkiotis, seconded by Commissioner Gordon to
appoint Beverly A. Blythe as Clerk to the Board.
VOTE: UNANIMOUS
3. County Attorney
A motion was made by Commissioner Halkiotis, seconded by Commissioner Gordon to
appoint the law firm of Coleman, Gledhill and Hargrave for legal services.
VOTE: UNANIMOUS
4. Board Member Appointments and Other Appointments
The Board decided they would discuss some of the appointments at their Goal Setting
Retreat on Saturday. They felt there is a need to redefine the role of a County Commissioner
serving on some of the boards where it is not mandated that a Commissioner serve.
A motion was made by Commissioner Gordon, seconded by Commissioner Crowther
to adopt the list as presented in the agenda.
VOTE: UNANIMOUS
III. BOARD COMMENTS
Commissioner Gordon noted she is the Commissioners' liaison on the University of North
Carolina Planning Panel for planning the Horace Williams tract and the Mason Farm tract. The
Consultant has presented a plan and the Panel will meet this Friday to prepare a response. She
made reference to the area adjacent to the proposed Human Services Center on Homestead Road
and said that the plan is to have a road to the west which will access the northern part of the tract.
Under potential uses they have included visitor services which will provide health services for people
who are visiting in the area. Another use would be for research. She feels the uses would be quite
compatible with the County's facility. She asked that the County Commissioners let her know of any
comments they want her to make. She made reference to the last item on the agenda and said that
the State's School Capital Construction Study Commission will be coming to Chapel Hill for a public
hearing on school construction issues. This is for the purpose of determining the role of the County
and State in funding school construction.
IV. COUNTY MANAGER'S REPORT
John Link made reference to the Goal Setting Retreat scheduled for Saturday and said that
there will be a dedication ceremony for those citizens who made contributions so that the Homestead
Center could become a reality for the community. He also distributed a youth guide that had just
been published. This was a collaboration between the Youth Services Advisory Committee and his
office.
V. RESOLUTIONS/PROCLAMATIONS -NONE
VI. SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS
A. Presentation -Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reaorting
John Link said that Orange County has been awarded the Government Finance
Officers' Association Certificate of Achievement each year since 1982. Each year the eligibility
standards for the award become more stringent.
3
The County Commissioners congratulated Ken Chavious and his staff for their
dedication and hard work necessary to win this award each year. The staff members present who
were congratulated were Debbie Smith, Joyce Refiners and Howard Fitts.
VII. PUBLIC HEARINGS -NONE
VIII. ITEMS FOR DECISION -CONSENT AGENDA
A motion was made by Commissioner Halkiotis, seconded by Commissioner Crowther to
approve those items on the Consent Agenda as listed below:
A. MINUTES
The Board approved the minutes for October 17, 1995 as presented.
B. EXAMINATION OF BONDS
The Board approved the bonds for officials pursuant to G.S. 109-5 at their current
levels listed in the abstract. The bonds ire written for the following amounts:
Sheriff $ 25,000
Register of Deeds 25,000
Finance Director 250,000
Tax Collector 30,000
All County Employees
(for faithful performance) 250,000
C. SECTION 8 SOFTWARE CONVERSION
The Board approved a Software License Agreement with Creative Computer Solutions
for the Section 8 Existing Housing Assistance Program and authorized the Chair to sign the
document upon approval of the County Attorney.
D. CRIMINAL JUSTICE PARTNERSHIP PROGRAM DISCRETIONARY GRANT
AWARD ACCEPTANCE
The Board accepted the grant for $166,320 which will be used to assist in the
expansion of Freedom House and authorized the County Manager, if necessary, to make minor
changes to the contract within the approved contract amount.
E. UNIVERSITY MANOR -PRELIMINARY PLAN
This was removed from the Consent Agenda and placed under items for decision
because the Planning Board approved this proposed subdivision by a 7-1 vote.
F. TUPELO RIDGE, PHASE TWO -PRELIMINARY PLAN
This property is located in western Chapel Hill Township on the east side of Union
Grove Church Road south of Albert Road. The total acreage of Phase Two is 40.84 acres.
Approximately 12.62 acres are in Orange County's jurisdiction. Twelve new residential lots are
proposed in Phase Two. The Board approved the Resolution for the Preliminary Plan as per the
Planning Board recommendation.
G. ORDINANCE RESTRICTING THE DISPOSAL OF CORRUGATED CARDBOARD
The Board adopted °An Ordinance Restricting the Disposal of Corrugated Cardboard at
the Orange County Regional Landfill" and approved the resolution imposing the penalty fees for
violations of the ban as stated on the next page:
4
RESOLUTION
ORANGE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
AN ORDINANCE RESTRICTING THE DISPOSAL OF CORRUGATED CARDBOARD AT THE
ORANGE COUNTY REGIONAL LANDFILL
WHEREAS, the Landfill Owners' Group has recommended that the local governments in Orange
County adopt ordinances banning from disposal at the Orange County Regional Landfill clean,
recyclable corrugated cardboard from non-residential generators; and
WHEREAS, it is estimated that as much as 4,000 tons of such cardboard could be removed from
Orange County's annual waste stream, thereby extending the life of the current landfill by up to eight
months and assisting in progress toward the statewide 40°~ waste reduction goal;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE ORANGE COUNTY BOARD OF
COMMISSIONERS THAT:
Section 1. Disposal of recyclable corrugated cardboard is restricted and regulated per the following
conditions:
a) Disposal of recyclable corrugated cardboard from non-residential sources is prohibited at the
Orange County Regional Landfill.
b) Disposal of recyclable corrugated cardboard in mixed solid waste receptacles maintained
throughout Orange County is prohibited, provided that incidental disposal of such material by
residential generators at staffed solid waste convenience centers maintained by Orange County shall
not be subject to such prohibition. Waste reduction and recycling of clean corrugated cardboard by
solid waste convenience center users will be encouraged, and any visible clean corrugated
cardboard will be removed from convenience center waste receptacles prior to transport of their
contents to the landfill. All bulk waste containers within Orange County shall be labeled with a
permanent visible sign, prominently displayed, stating that recyclable corrugated cardboard is
prohibited from being dumped. These signs shall be in place by March 1, 1996.
c) Any hauler of non-residential waste to the landfill shall be subject to this prohibition. The disposal
prohibition applies to all non-residential loads of waste delivered by haulers to the landfill including
mixed loads that contain both residential and non-residential waste. All waste delivered to the
landfill in small quantities by pick-up trucks, vans, small trailers and automobiles will also be subject
to this prohibition.
d) For the purpose of this prohibition, non-residential waste includes, but is not limited to, waste
generated by:
(I) the commercial, institutional, industrial, construction, and multi-family sectors;
(ii) waste collected from bulk containers, including dumpsters, compactors, roll-off containers,
and delivered to the landfill in bulk container collection vehicles, except for those bulk
containers provided for at staffed solid waste convenience centers maintained by Orange
County, and;
(iii) all other waste generated by the non-residential sectors that is delivered to the landfill in any
type conveyance.
e) For the purposes of this prohibition, recyclable corrugated cardboard refers to all corrugated
cardboard that is deemed recyclable by current industry standards. Any cardboard that is not
recyclable due to contamination at the source (e.g. saturated with food) or due to its nature (e.g.
waxed boxes) is exempt from the corrugated cardboard ban and the penalty imposed by this
5
ordinance. Cardboard contaminated by action of the generator or hauler is not exempt from the
penalty fee imposed by this ordinance.
Section 2. Haulers found in violation of Section 1 are subject to a penalty fee as adopted, and
periodically revised, by the owners of the Orange County Regional Landfill.
Section 3. The penalty provisions in Section 2 shall be effective March 1, 1996. The remainder of
this ordinance shall be effective upon adoption, this 4th day of December, 1995.
ORANGE COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
A RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING A PENALTY FEE FOR THE DISPOSAL OF NON-RESIDENTIAL
RECYCLABLE CORRUGATED CARDBOARD AT THE ORANGE COUNTY LANDFILL
WHEREAS, the Landfill Owners' Group has determined that a prohibition on landfilling of clean,
recyclable corrugated cardboard in the Orange County Regional Landfill will extend the life of the
landfill by at least eight months, and
WHEREAS, recyclable corrugated cardboard has steady recycling markets easily available to
Orange County, and
WHEREAS, corrugated cardboard is aloes-density, easily identifiable material which takes up
considerable landfill space, and
WHEREAS, ,recyclable corrugated cardboard has been successfully collected and recycled
throughout the County by public and private haulers for the past seven years, and
WHEREAS, alternatives are available to those affected by the ban who do not wish to hire a service
to remove recyclable cardboard for recycling, and
WHEREAS, Orange County finds that it is in the best interest of all the citizens and would promote
the public health if corrugated cardboard is not accepted for disposal at the Orange County Regional
Landfill, and
WHEREAS, Orange County has adopted an ordinance which prohibits the disposal of non-
residential recyclable corrugated cardboard at the Orange County Regional Landfill;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Orange County Board of Commissioners that ;the
penalty fee for haulers violating the ordinance banning disposal of non-residential recyclable
corrugated cardboard at the Orange County Regional Landfill shall be equal to twice the prevailing
tipping fee per ton, or $25.00, whichever is greater, effective March 1, 1996.
VOTE ON THE CONSENT AGENDA: UNANIMOUS
IX. ITEMS FOR DECISION -REGULAR AGENDA
A. CONTRACT APPROVAL FOR JAIUCOURTHOUSE PROJECT
The Board considered approving a contract with Trafalgar House Construction
Company for construction of the Jail/Courthouse project. The final contract price with Trafalgar
House is $3,482,968. This will leave approximately $225,000 for contingency.
Commissioner Halkiotis expressed a concern about the 10 month time period. He
does not think it can be finished within 10 months. Purchasing Director Pam Jones will keep the
Board informed of the progress on these projects.
A motion was made by Chair Carey, seconded by Commissioner Crowther to approve
the contract with Trafalgar House Construction Company for the construction of the Jail/Courthouse
6
project in the amount of $3,482,968 contingent upon Attorney and Staff review and authorize the
Manager to execute change orders as may become necessary to the extent of the project budget,
and to authorize the Chair to sign on behalf of the Board.
VOTE: UNANIMOUS
B. BID AWARD -OLD COURTHOUSE PAINTING AND MAINTENANCE WORK
Pam Jones asked that the Board consider awarding a bid and approving a contract to
Trafalgar House Construction Company for maintenance work to be done at the Old Courthouse.
The work involves painting all exterior trim, replacing gutters and reglazing windows.
A motion was made by Commissioner Gordon, seconded by Commissioner Crowther
to award the bid for maintenance work to be done at the Old Courthouse and approve the contract
contingent upon Attorney and Staff review to Trafalgar House Construction Company in the amount
of $107,100 and authorize the Manager to execute change orders as may be necessary to the extent
of the project budget and authorize the Chair to sign on behalf of the Board.
VOTE: UNANIMOUS
C. SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT GOALS
The Landfill Organization and Financing Options Work Group has been meeting
throughout 1995 to consider options for reorganizing the management of solid waste in Orange
County and its municipalities. During a series of meetings, the work group discussed and refined a
list of proposed solid waste management goals and a mission statement designed to help the group
establish a foundation for the future governance of the landfill and other solid waste management
activities.
In answer to a question from Commissioner Gordon, Commissioner Willhoit stated that
the Orange Solid Waste Management Group is a citizen group which has been meeting for several
years. Wilbert McAdoo is the County staff support for this group.
A motion was made by Commissioner Gordon, seconded by Commissioner Halkiotis
to adopt the solid waste management goals and mission statement as presented in the agenda.
VOTE: UNANIMOUS
D. VOLUNTARY DUES -THE GREATER TRIANGLE REGIONAL COUNCIL
Chair Carey asked that the Board consider approving an allocation of $3,000 in
voluntary dues for the Greater Triangle Regional Council. The Council has very low administrative
fees and they have received grants from different businesses. He said that the Council is focusing
on three strategic directions:
1. the project to examine regional development choices
2. the Triangle Universities Research Consortium on Youth at Risk, and
3. regional wastewater management alternatives
Commissioner Gordon noted that this was a group created and sponsored by Triangle
J Council of Governments. When it was created, it was thought that resources would be raised
privately. She feels this item needs to be considered as part of the budget process. Her major
concern is that there are so many regional organizations that governments are trying to fund. She
also questioned if it is appropriate for this group to be working on a regional land use plan.
After additional discussion, the Board decided to consider this request during the
regular budget cycle.
ITEM FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA
7
E. UNIVERSITY MANOR _ PRELIMINARY PLAN
The property is located on the south side of NC 10 east of New Hope Church Road.
Forty-seven residential lots are proposed on the 95-acre portion of the property located on the west
side of Stoney Creek. Individual on-site septic systems are proposed. Water will be provided by
community wells. Approximately 23 acres (24%) of the subdivision are contained within an open
space area to be owned by the homeowner's association.
Commissioner Gordon questioned the location of the two community wells. Planner
Mary Willis said that the two community well sites have been approved by the Orange County
Environmental Health Division and the Public Water Supply Branch of the NC Division of
Environmental Management. If they drill and find no water, they would need to find alternate sites.
Before the subdivision can receive 1'tnal approval, the well system will have to be completed. The
wells will be owned by the homeowners association but conveyed to a utility company .
Mary Willis said that the schools reviewed the plan in June and showed no interest in a
school site. Also, the Stoney Creek Planning Group reviewed this project. This needs to be
approved by January 18, 1996.
Commissioner Gordon asked that #4-B on page 7 be deleted so that the community
water system must be constructed according to the plans approved by DEM's Public Water and
Sewer Branch with no other choice.
Commissioner Halkiotis asked how many community water systems there are in
Orange County. This information will be provided before the next meeting.
A motion was made by Commissioner Gordon, seconded by Commissioner Willhoit to
table this item until December 19, 1995.
VOTE: UNANIMOUS
X. REPORTS
A. JOHN JEFFRIES _ OCCANEECHI RE UEST FOR STATE RECOGNITION
Mr. John Jeffries distributed a map which showed the Indian attractions in North
Carolina. It also showed the proposed Occaneechi VillageNisitor Center for Hillsborough.
After a brief discussion a motion was made by Commissioner Halkiotis, seconded by
Commissioner Gordon to approve the resolution of support for state recognition as stated below:
RESOLUTION OF SUPPORT
FOR
STATE AND FEDERAL RECOGNITION
WHEREAS, the ancestors of the Occaneechi-Saponi were an ancient people who
collectively called themselves Yesah or the people who originally came from
lands to the west, over the Appalachian and Blue Ridge mountains in an area
known today as the Ohio River Valley, and
WHEREAS, nearly one thousand years ago, the Yesah came under attack from a
powerful enemy and were forced to migrate over the mountains to their east
and settle in what is now the piedmont of Virginia and North Carolina, and
WHEREAS, as a result of their power, the influence of the Occaneechi and
of the Yesah peoples were spread far and wide and both the general language
of trade and the rituals of the indigenous religion of the region were
spoken in the Occaneechi dialect, and
WHEREAS, in May of the year 1676, the independence of the Occaneechi and of
the Yesah peoples came to an abrupt end, when Nathaniel Bacon led his
militia into the land of the Occaneechi in the spring of the year and
forced a fight .which ultimately broke the power of the tribe and scattered
the Yesah people, and
8
WHEREAS, after being attacked by Bacon's militia, the Occaneechi were
forced south and settled along the Eno River near present day Hillsborough,
North Carolina, and
WHEREAS, in 1713, the colony of Virginia and Great Britain signed a treaty
of peace with the Yesah and the Occaneechi returned to Virginia where they
were joined by their cousins the Saponi, Tutelo, Stuckanocks, and
Meiponsky, and
WHEREAS, all the tribes joined together and adopted the name of the Saponi
and were thereafter known as the Saponi Nation, and
WHEREAS, by the mid 1700's the tribe had resettled in what is now
Greensville, Brunswick, Mecklenburg and Northampton counties on the
Virginia/North Caroilna border, and
WHEREAS, they stayed there until the 1780's when in response to increasing
pressure from neighboring whites, the community began moving back to the
area near the Eno River where they had once lived, settling in the
northeast section of Alamance County and adjoining Orange County and
WHEREAS, since that time, some of the people moved to Ohio and Indiana but
the bulk of the Saponi people remained in "Little Texas" forming an
independent Indian community which was based on small scale farming, and
WHEREAS, the Saponi people formally reorganized in 1984 as the Eno-
Occaneechi Indian Association, Inc. with a Tribal Board of Directors which
represents the tribe at the local, state and national level and which deals
with problems facing the community, and
WHEREAS, in February of 1995, the Tribal Board of Directors voted to amend
the name of the tribe to the OCCANEECHI BAND OF THE SAPONI NATION
to more accurately reflect the ancestry of the tribe.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE ORANGE COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS does hereby
recognize the OCCANEECHI BAND OF THE SAF'ONI NATION as a Native American
tribe indigenous to Orange County and
FURTHERMORE, THE ORANGE COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS does hereby support
the OCCANEECHI BAND OF THE SAF'ONI NATION in their request for State and
Federal recognition.
VOTE: UNANIMOUS
B. REPORT ON VOLUNTEER FAMILIES FOR CHILDREN
Executive Director of the Volunteer Families for Children Juanita Clemmons explained
that the Volunteer Families for Children organization recruits, trains and licenses volunteers who
then make their homes available on an emergency basis to children and teenagers who do not fit
other programs' guidelines and thus have nowhere else to go. This is the only organization which
does this on an emergency basis. They receive funding from the Department of Social Services and
CBA. She asked that the County Commissioners consider an allocation of $15,000 to help pay for a
full-time Social Work Coordinator.
John Link suggested and the Board referred this request to the administration to review
this request and bring back to the Commissioners a recommendation. Commissioner Crowther
suggested that the Human Services Advisory Commission also review this request.
C. ORANGE COUNTY SMALL BUSINESS LOAN PROGRAM
The Board received a proposal to develop an Orange County Small Business Loan
Program. A verbal agreement has been reached with the bankers to participate in a 3-year, one half
million dollar loan pool. This program would provide market-rate loans to local small businesses.
The banks would provide all initial capital at cost. The County would manage the program and
provide a 30 % loan loss reserve.
9
Commissioner Gordon said she is generally in favor of this program but asked if priority
could be given to those who presently live in Orange County . She feels that the program should
encourage small businesses for those who now live in Orange County.
Chair Carey feels it is an excellent idea. However, he does not think the program
should be limited to applicants who reside in Orange County. He is concerned with jobs for Orange
County citizens and not so much where they originate.
Karen Raleigh, Chair of the Economic Development Commission, answered various
questions about the Loan Committee which will consist of 6 representatives from the participating
financial institutions and 2 representatives appointed by the County.
Commissioner Gordon asked that there be an appeal process for banks which are not
chosen to participate in this program.
A motion was made by Commissioner Crowther, seconded by Commissioner Gordon to
direct the staff to develop the legal documents to start the program and bring back this item for final
approval.
VOTE: UNANIMOUS
D. FINAL REPORT OF SKILL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM BOARD
The Board received a report from the Orange County Skill Development Program
Board. The findings and recommendations from the 23-member workgroup are included in the
agenda.
Commissioner Halkiotis asked about the space at the Northern Center and was told
that it was all being used for other programs and that with increased usage of this center, the
infrastructure would need to be renovated or replaced. Commissioner Halkiotis said that he feels
there must be existing facilities somewhere which could be used and asked that the County look at
what is in place before looking at another facility. He is interested in doing whatever is necessary to
keep kids out of jails.
A motion was made by Commissioner Gordon, seconded by Commissioner Halkiotis to
receive the report as information.
VOTE: UNANIMOUS
E. REPORT _ JUSTICE FACILITY STUDY GROUP FINDINGS
The Board received information as presented by Mr.Fripp who worked with the Justice
Facilities Study Committee to formulate recommendations for future facility needs. The summary
and recommendations were included with the agenda and on file in the Clerk's office.
Mr. Fripp said that they considered demographics and transportation and came up with
a primary and secondary facility. He summarized what kind of functions would take place at each
location, a primary facility in Hillsborough and a secondary facility in Chapel Hill.
Commissioner Willhoit indicated he would like to challenge the assumption about the
demographics which were used and the report's conclusion about the location of the primary and
secondary facility.
Commissioner Gordon asked about the recommendation to contract for site selection if
the County decides to use County-owned property. Mr. Fripp said that this was included in case the
County Commissioners wanted to look at other sites.
John Link said that the next step will be to share this report with the municipalities
because building a facility of this magnitude will have an impact on traffic. They want to receive
input from these entities before proceeding. He suggested that if a site is purchased, some of that
site could be used for private businesses until the County needs it.
10
A motion was made by Commissioner Gordon, seconded by Commissioner Halkiotis to
receive the report as information.
VOTE: UNANIMOUS
F. CURRENT FORESTRY PRACTICES AND WOOD PROCESSING
The Board received a report on current forestry practices in the County and wood
processing plants. Brad Bowling, County Forest Ranger, said that these plants use a 100-mile
buying radius. The report in the agenda outlined the current practice and the impact of new
oriented strand board mills. The Board received this report as information.
G. PUBLIC HEARINGS -SCHOOL CAPITAL CONSTRUCTION STUDY
The Board received information on a series of nine meetings and public hearings
planned across the state to gather input on school construction needs and ways of paying for these
needs. The session for Orange County schools will be held on December 12.
It was the consensus of the Board to develop a statement to be read at the public
hearing. This will be reviewed at the Commissioners' Goal Setting Retreat scheduled for Saturday,
December 9.
XI. APPOINTMENTS -NONE
XII. MINUTES -NONE
XIII. CLOSED SESSION -NONE
XIV. ADJOURNMENT
With no further items to be considered, Chair Carey adjourned the meeting. The next
regular meeting will be held on Saturday, December 9, 1995 at 8:30 a.m. at the Homestead
Community Center in Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Moses Carey, Jr., Chair
Beverly A. Blythe, Clerk