HomeMy WebLinkAboutORD-2008-014 - Zoning Ordinance Amendment of Planned Development review & approval proceduresBARRYJACOSS, CHAIR ORANGE COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
E P. F , V /CE - POST OFFICE BOX 8181
JR CHA /R
MOOSES S CAREY, ✓R
ALJCEM. GoRooN
MIKE NELSON
200 SOUTH CAMERON STREET
HILLSBOROUGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27278
ORANGE COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
CERTIFICATION OF THE ORANGE COUNTY
ZONING ORDINANCE
ORANGE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
CLERK'S CERTIFICATION
aRIV -- .20 0OVI- 0//4/1
d%vrer,�eor 4 -3 -dg
I, Donna S. Baker, County Clerk of the County of Orange, North Carolina, hereby
certify that the attached is a true and correct copy of the document entitled "Land
Use Element of the Orange County Comprehensive Plan" as amended through
June 3, 2008 and as included in the minute book of said County.
This the 3 I day of June 2008.
4&&a4=
Donna S. Baker
County Clerk
u 9� CbmP)e�-c COVI
d i N
JuN� 3,
www.co.oranae.nc.us
Protecting and preserving — People, Resources, Quality of Life
Orange County, North Carolina — You Count!
(919) 245 -2130 . FAX (919) 644 -0246
yz
A,w b."q 0 a
aI =JAI ►1[C-i =Wa
slivil
�j w.
BARRYJACOSS, CHAIR ORANGE COUNTY BOARD OF JR COMMISSIONERS
E P. FOUSHEE, VICE-CHAIR
MOOSES S CAREY, POST OFFICE BOX 8181
M. CORDON
MIKE NELSON
200 SOUTH CAMERON STREET
MIKE
NE
HILLSBOROUGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27278
ORANGE COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
CERTIFICATION OF THE ORANGE COUNTY
ZONING ORDINANCE
ORANGE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
CLERK'S CERTIFICATION
A,4Py4ved lo- 3;--X- dP
Z/ -z-
I Tn
0
\h �atia%
I, Donna S. Baker, County Clerk of the County of Orange, North Carolina, hereby
certify that the attached is a true and correct copy of the ordinance entitled
"Orange County Zoning Ordinance" as amended through June 3, 2008 and as
included in the minute book of said County.
This the 3'd day of June 2008.
Cap`..
Ca 41nle�e .0 V tj
koccc f"R 1 N
Old L
Donna S. Baker
County Clerk
www. co. orange.nc. us
Protecting and preserving — People, Resources, Quality of Life
Orange County, North Carolina — You Count!
(919) 245 -2130 • FAX (919) 644 -0246
"C-E
-ORDiNAIl
al y
yz
Attachment 1 O
AMENDMENTS TO THE
ORANGE COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE
(Only those sections or subsections amended are set out below)
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF ORANGE
COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA, hereby amends the Orange County Zoning
Ordinance by adding (indicated by double underlined language) and deleting
(indicated by stricken through language) as follows:
Proposed 'Amendment: Part 1
7.2.4 imposed Conditions
The Board of County Commissioners its agencies, or the
petitioner may impose ro ose such conditions upon
approval of a Special Use Permit for a Planned Development
District as will afford
1. Conformance of the development and use of the site
to County ordinances, the officially adopted Orange
County Comprehensive Plan, any adopted Small Area
Plan .relevant to the Property and any other relevant
adopted plan.
2. Those conditions that address the impacts expected
to be generated by the development or use of the site
`�I , ,
weld- ensuFe t'17'R't s�JubstanRntiaT-justiee is done an
equitable tFe atment nre�viti�
��rnsamrcrcusrrrcnrP�ry a-rQ
Only those conditions mutually agreed upon by the Coin
and the petitioner may be incorporated into the zoning
regulations I or special use permit requirements. The
petitioner shall agree in writing to all applicable conditions
prior to a final approval of the application.
Proposed Amendment: Part II
7.2.5 Special Use Required For Each Planned Development
Within the Planned Development District only those uses
authorized by Article 4 as permitted in the zoning district with
which the PD corresponds shall be permitted, and all other
requirements of the corresponding district shall be meta In
Attachment 1 (@
addition, within a PD no use shall be permitted except
pursuant to a Special Use Permit authorized by the County
Commissioners which shall specify the use or uses
authorized as required in Article 8.8.23.
If the petition is approved, the County Commissioners shall
issue a Special Use Permit authorizing the requested use
with such feaser+able conditions as agreed upon pursuant to
Section 7.2.4 of this Ordinance. the gOVeFRing body
determine to he desiFable in PFDFA +tine publin heath safety
and welfaFe
The authorization of a Special Use Permit in any Planned
Development District for any use which is permitted only as
a "Class B" special use in the zoning district which
corresponds to the Planned Development District shall
preclude any requirement for Board of Adjustment approval
but shall be approved by the Board of County
Commissioners.
Proposed Amendment: Part III
7.5.4 Zoning Officer's Recommendations
At such time as further conferences appear unnecessary, or
at any time on request of the applicant, the Zoning Officer
shall prepare a written report to the Planning Board and
Board of County Commissioners, containing the following
findings:
a) As to the suitability of the proposals for the general
type of PD category, the physical characteristics of
the land, and relation of the proposed
development to surrounding areas and existing
and probable future development;
b) As to relation to major roads and mass transit
facilities, utilities and other facilities and services;
c) As to the adequacy of evidence on unified control
and the suitability of any proposed agreements,
contracts, deed restrictions, sureties, dedications,
contributions, guarantees, or other instruments, or
the need for such instruments, or for amendments
in those proposed;
Attachment 1 0
d) As to the suitability of plans proposed or the
desirability of amendments;
e) As to the adherence to PD or general regulations
or as to desirable specific modifications in PD or
general regulations as applied to the particular
case, based on determination that such
modifications are necessary or justified in the
I articular case by demonstration that the public
purposes of PD or other regulations would be met
to at least an equivalent degree by such
modifications.
Based on such findings, the Zoning Officer shall recommend
approval of the PD amendment proposed, approval
conditioned on agreed upon modifications or disapproval,
with recorded reasons therefore.
All recommended conditions or modifications shall be
reviewed and agreed upon by the applicant and the County.
Board of Commissioners in accordance with the provisions
of Section 7.2.4 of this Ordinance.
Proposed Amendment: Part IV
7.5.5 Actions by Planning Board: Board of County Commissioners
Actions by. the Planning Board and Board of County
Commissioners shall be as provided for amendments
generally. (See Article 20.) The Board of County
Commissioners may grant the application in accordance with
PD and other applisable -Go=unk-regulations as provided in
Section 7.5 or may approve the application with conditions
Section 7.24 or may deny the ap lication.
Upon motion of Commissioner
seconded by Commissioner , the
foregoing Zoning Ordinance amendments were adopted this the 3 day
of C' , 2008 and s
1
Donna Baker, Clerk,
0
§ 153A -342. Districts; zoning less than entire jurisdiction.
(a) A county may divide its territorial jurisdiction into districts of any number,
shape, and area that it may consider best suited to carry out the purposes of this Part.
Within these districts a county may regulate and restrict the erection, construction,
reconstruction, alteration, repair, or use of buildings, structures, or land. Such districts
may include, but shall not be limited to, general use districts, in which a variety of uses
are permissible in accordance with general standards; overlay districts, in which
additional requirements are imposed on certain properties within one or more
underlying general or special use districts; special use districts or conditional use
districts, in which uses are permitted only upon the issuance of a special use permit or a
conditional use permit and conditional zoning districts, in which site plans and
individualized development conditions are imposed.
(b) Property may be placed in a special use district, conditional use district, or
conditional district only in response to a petition by the owners of all the property to be
included. Specific conditions applicable to the districts may be proposed by the
petitioner or the county or its agencies, but only those conditions mutually approved by
the county and the petitioner may be incorporated into the zoning regulations or permit
requirements. Conditions and site - specific standards imposed in a conditional district
shall be limited to those that address the conformance of the development and use of the
site to county ordinances and an officially adopted comprehensive or other plan and
those that address the impacts reasonably expected to be generated by the development
or use of the site.
A statement analyzing the reasonableness of the proposed rezoning shall be prepared
for each petition for a rezoning to a special or conditional use district, or a conditional
district, or other small -scale rezoning.
(c) Except as authorized by the foregoing, all regulations shall be uniform for
each class or kind of building throughout each district, but the regulations in one district
may differ from those in other districts.
(d) A county may determine that the public interest does not require that the
entire territorial jurisdiction of the county be zoned and may designate one or more
portions of that jurisdiction as a zoning area or areas. A zoning area must originally
contain at least 640 acres and at least 10 separate tracts of land in separate ownership
and may thereafter be expanded by the addition of any amount of territory. A zoning
area may be regulated in the same manner as if the entire county were zoned, and the
remainder of the county need not be regulated. (1959, c. 1006, s. 1; 1965, c. 194, s. 2;
1973, c. 822, s. 1; 1985, c. 607, s. 3; 2005 -426, s. 6(b).)
G.S. 153A -342 Page 1
eA4W a240,15'- a/ �/
y Z-
Commissioner Carey said that the meeting on August 191h will be loaded as well, and
the Board would have to discuss it at a subsequent meeting, which would push the timing out
even further.
m Chair Jacobs said that the deadline for getting this on the November ballot is August
29. The next meeting after August 19th is in September. He suggested putting this on the
agenda for June 24th for discussion.
Al z. Zonina Ordinance Text Amendment: Planned Development Review and
Approval Procedures
The Board considered accepting additional evidence, if any; accepting the Planning
Board recommendation; closing the public hearing; and adopting the proposed amendments to
several provisions contained within "Article Seven (7) Planned Development" of the Zoning
Ordinance.
Commissioner Gordon said that she removed this item because it does not really lend
itself to being on the consent agenda.
Geof Gledhill said that the public hearing is closed on these two text amendments and
the Planning Board's recommendation is included.
A motion was made by Commissioner Gordon, seconded by Commissioner Foushee to
approve administration's recommendation to accept the Planning Board recommendation and
adopt the proposed amendments to the Zoning Ordinance pertaining to Planned Development
review and approval procedures.
VOTE: UNANIMOUS
aa. Zonina Ordinance Text Amendment: Telecommunication Wireless Facility
The Board considered accepting additional evidence, if any; accepting the Planning
Board recommendation; to closing the public hearing; and adopting the proposed amendments
to four sections /articles of the Orange County Zoning Ordinance concerning the review,
approval, and development of telecommunication wireless facilities.
Commissioner Gordon noted that the legislature made changes. She asked if this was
all that was changed and if anything had changed in scope and Craig Benedict said no.
A motion was made by Commissioner Carey, seconded by Commissioner Gordon to
accept additional evidence, if any; accept the Planning Board recommendation; to close the
public hearing; and to adopt the proposed amendments to four sections /articles of the Orange
County Zoning Ordinance concerning the review, approval, and development of
telecommunication wireless facilities.
VOTE: UNANIMOUS
bb. Request to Schedule a Public Hearing for June 24 2008 on SUP- A -2 -08
Farm Montessori School Application
The Board considered scheduling a public hearing for the June 24, 2008 regular
meeting to review the SUP- A -2 -08 Farm Montessori School application.
Commissioner Gordon said that the notice was defective last month, and she
understands the urgency of getting this back on, but asked if there would be time to consider
it, since the June 24th meeting will have a full agenda..
Chair Jacobs said that the Board would deal with this that night and try to keep
comments to a minimum. He said that it would be a shame to penalize the applicant since a
mistake was made.
ORANGE COUNTY
BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS AND
PLANNING BOARD
QUARTERLY PUBLIC HEARING AGENDA ITEM ABSTRACT
Meeting-Date: February 25, 2008
Action Agenda
Item No. U-Q
SUBJECT: Zoning Ordinance Amendment of Planned Development review and approval
procedures
DEPARTMENT: Planning and.lnspections PUBLIC HEARING: (YIN) Yes
ATTACHMENT(S): .
1. Proposed Ordinance Amendment
2. NCGS 153A -342
INFORMATION CONTACT:
Name, Phone Number
Craig Benedict 245 -2592
Michael Harvey 245 -2607
1
PURPOSE: To amend several provisions contained within "Article Seven (7) Planned
Development" of the Zoning Ordinance in order to insure compliance with State law concerning
conditions . of approval proposed during the approval process of Planned Development
(hereafter "PD ") applications.
BACKGROUND:
Staff has determined that changes made to Chapter 153A of the NC General Statutes during
the 2005 legislative session have created a discrepancy between the County's current Zoning
Ordinance and State statutes regarding the process for placing conditions on the approval of
Planned Development ( "PD ") applications.
State regulations, specifically NCGS 153A -342, allows for the placement of conditions on PD
applications by the County or the petitioner but only: ... those conditions mutually approved
by the county and the petitioner may be incorporated into the zoning regulations or permit
requirements.'
Further, NCGS 153A -342 limits the imposition of any condition to those that are designed to
address the: ' ... conformance of the development and use of the site to county ordinances and
an officially adopted comprehensive or other plan and those that address the impacts
reasonably expected to be generated by the development or use of the site.' .
Within the County's Zoning Ordinance, specifically "Section 7.2.4 Imposed Conditions," the
establishment of conditions on PD applications occur in the following manner:
The Board of County Commissioners may impose such reasonable conditions
upon approval of a Special Use Permit for a Planned Development District as will
2
afford protection of the public health, safety, and general welfare, ensure that
substantial justice is done and equitable treatment provided.
Section 7.2.5 Special Use Required For Each Planned Development, also references the
imposition of conditions for a PD request, specifically:
If the petition is approved, the County Commissioners shall issue a Special Use
Permit authorizing the requested use with such reasonable conditions as the
goveming body determine to be desirable in promoting public health, safety and
welfare.
In reviewing this language, staff believes that the
be complaint with current State law. Staff props
Ordinance as proposed on Attachment 1 in or
continue to work on additional modifications tc
proposed to the Board in December of 2007.
FINANCIAL IMPACT: None
current process requires revision in order to
,ses to amend the existing sections of the
!er to address this discrepancy. Staff will
the County's PD regulations as originally
RECOMMENDATION(S): The Zoning Officer recommends that the Board(s):
1. Receive the proposed amendments,
2. Conduct the Public Hearing
3. Refer the amendment package to the Planning Board for review and comment with a
request that a recommendation be submitted no latter than April 2, 2008
3
AMENDMENTS TO THE
ORANGE COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE
(Only those sections or subsections amended are set out below).
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF ORANGE
COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA, hereby amends the Orange County Zoning
Ordinance by adding (indicated by double underlined language) and deleting
(indicated by stricken through language) as follows:
Proposed Amendment: Part 1
7.2.4 esed Conditions
The Board of County Commissioners, its agencies or the
petitioner may impose rp opose such reasonable conditions
upon approval of a Special Use Permit for a Planned
Development District as will afford conformance of the
development and use of the site to County ordinances and
the Comprehensive Plan and that address the impacts
reasonably expected to be generated by the' development or
use of the site. of the PubliG health, safety,
general welfare, emw e that substantial i� � inc is Anne and
eq itab{e-- tfeatment pFevided. •O•"nlvJ those conditions
mutually agreed upon by the County and the petitioner may
be incorporated into the zoning regulations or special use
permit requirements. The petitioner shall agree in writing to
all applicable conditions prior to a final -approval of the
application.
Proposed Amendment: Part II
7.2.5 Special Use Required For Each Planned Development
Within the Planned Development District only those uses
authorized by Article 4 as permitted in the zoning district with
which the PD corresponds shall be permitted, and all other
requirements of the corresponding district shall be met. In
addition, within a PD no use shall be permitted except
pursuant to a Special Use Permit authorized by the County
Commissioners which shall specify the use or uses
authorized as required in Article 8.8.23.
q
If the petition is approved, the County Commissioners shall
issue a Special Use Permit authorizing the requested use
with such reasenable conditions as agreed upon pursuant to
Section 7.2.4 of this Ordinance. he -gee .ems^ body
and w6lfaFe,
The authorization of a Special Use' Permit in any Planned
Development District for any use which is permitted only as
a "Class B" special use in the zoning district which
corresponds to the Planned Development District shall
preclude any requirement for Board of Adjustment approval
but shall be approved by the Board of County
Commissioners.
Proposed Amendment: Part 111
7.5.4 Zoning Officer's Recommendations
At such time as further conferences appear unnecessary, or
at anytime on request of the applicant, the Zoning Officer
shall prepare a written report to the Planning Board and
Board of County Commissioners, containing the following
findings:
a) As to the suitability of the proposals for the general
type of PD category, the physical characteristics of
the land, and relation of the proposed
development to surrounding areas and existing
and probable future development;
b) As to relation to major roads and mass transit
facilities, utilities and other facilities and services;
c) As to the adequacy of evidence on unified control
and the suitability of any proposed agreements,
contracts, deed restrictions, sureties, dedications,
contributions, guarantees, or other instruments, or
the need for such instruments, or for amendments
in those proposed;
d) As to the suitability of plans proposed or 'the
desirability of amendments;
e) As to the adherence to PD or general regulations
or as to desirable specific modifications in PD or
J
general regulations as applied to the particular
case, based on determination that such
modifications are necessary or justified in the
particular case by demonstration that the public
purposes of PD or other regulations would be met
to at least an equivalent degree by such
modifications.
Based on such findings, the Zoning Officer shall recommend
approval of the PD amendment proposed, approval
conditioned on agreed upon modifications or disapproval,
with recorded reasons therefore.
All recommended conditions or modifications shall be
reviewed and agreed upon by the aonlicant and the County
Board of Commissioners in accordance with the provisions
Of Section 7.2.4 of this Ordinance.
Proposed Amendment: Part IV
7.5.5 Actions by Planninq Board: Board of County Commissioners
Actions by the Planning Board and Board of County
Commissioners shall be as provided for amendments
generally. (See Article 20) The Board of County
Commissioners may grant the application in accordance with
PD and other applicable -Coup regulations as provided in
Section 7.5 or may approve the application with conditions
attached-- anaroved in accordance with the requirements of
Section 7.2.4, or may deny the application.
Upon motion of Commissioner
seconded by Commissioner
the
foregoing Zoning Ordinance amendments were adopted this the day
of , 2008 and shall become effective upon adoption.
Donna Baker, Clerk, Orange County Commissioners
In,
153A -342. Districts; zoning less than entire jurisdiction.
(a) A county may divide its territorial jurisdiction into districts of any number,
shape, and area that it may consider best suited to carry out the purposes of this Part.
Within these districts a county may regulate and restrict the erection, construction,
reconstruction, alteration, repair, or use of buildings, structures, or land. Such districts
may include, but shall not be limited to, general use districts, in which a variety of uses
are permissible in accordance with general standards; overlay districts, in which
additional requirements are imposed on certain properties within one or more
underlying general or special use districts; special use districts or conditional use
districts, in which uses are permitted only upon the issuance of a special use permit-or a
conditional use permit and conditional zoning districts, in which site plans and
individualized development conditions are imposed.
(b) Property may be placed in a special use district, conditional use district, or
conditional district only in response to a petition by the owners of all the property to be
included. Specific conditions applicable to the districts may be proposed by the
petitioner or the county or its agencies, but only those conditions mutually approved by
the county and the petitioner may be incorporated into the zoning regulations or permit
requirements. Conditions and site - specific standards imposed in a conditional district
shall be limited to those that address the conformance of the development and use of the
site to county ordinances and an officially adopted comprehensive or other plan and
those that address the impacts reasonably expected to be generated by the development
or use of the site.
A statement analyzing the reasonableness of the proposed rezoning shall be prepared
for each petition for a rezoning to a special or conditional use district, or a conditional
district, or other small - scale rezoning.
(c) Except as authorized- by the foregoing, all regulations shall be uniform for
each class or kind of building throughout each district, but the regulations in one district
may differ from those in other districts.
(d) A county may determine that the public interest does not require that the
entire territorial jurisdiction of the county be zoned and may designate one or more
portions of that jurisdiction as a zoning area or areas. A zoning area must originally
contain at least 640 acres and at least 10 separate tracts of land in separate ownership
and may thereafter be expanded by the addition of any amount of territory. A zoning
area may be regulated in the same manner as if the entire county were zoned, and the
remainder of the county need not be regulated. (1959, c. 1006, s. l; 1965, c. 194, s. 2;
1973, c. 822, s. 1;'1985, c. 607, s. 3; 2005 -426, s. 6(b).)
G.S. 153A -342 Page 1
p� a�rcz�
Chair Jacobs said that the remaining items would be deferred to the next public hearing.
He asked Craig Benedict to walk the Board through page 4 of the agenda abstract.
Craig Benedict said that the staff received the application for Planned Development and
Class A Special Use Permit. Part of the package was the Zoning Officer's assessment of the
report. As part of that report, the staff also submits for evidence the County's existing zoning
code or land use element and EDD Manual. The staff conducted at least part of the public
hearing on the applications tonight. Item 4 is when the Board intends to adjourn this meeting to
a time certain to hear additional public comment. The process timelines are on the bottom of
page 4. The staff suggests that on March 5th some additional questions can come forward in
writing so that the developer can answer those questions or staff can research in the short-term.
Depending on when the Commissioners would like to decide on this item, there is a timeline that
sets up when the various meetings can occur. It is recommended that this meeting be
adjourned to a time certain where the Planning Board would have to come back and meet jointly
with the County Commissioners at a regular meeting of the Board of County Commissioners. At
that time, staff would be able to provide any additional information that they have uncovered.
Also, it's very important to understand that the special use permit part of this — all of the
evidence and all of the information that comes forward needs to be held very closely so that the
information can be spread equally to all parties concerned (elected bodies, appointed bodies,
developer, and the public).
Chair Jacobs suggested trying to put this item back on the agenda on April 1 st. The
Board agreed.
A motion was made by Commissioner Nelson, seconded by Commissioner Foushee to
adjourn this meeting (11:08 p.m.) to April 1st at 7:30 p.m. at the F. Gordon Battle Courtroom in
Hillsborough, North Carolina.
VOTE: UNANIMOUS
The meeting was adjourned at this point, so the below items will be on the re- convened meeting
on April 1st
2. Zoning Ordinance Text Amendments:
a. Telecommunications Towers: Amendments to promote consistency with
December 1, 2007 revisions to NC General Statutes concerning Wireless
Telecommunications Facilities.
b. Planned Development: Amendments to address inconsistencies between
existing ordinance requirements and NC General Statutes, specifically the
requirement that imposed conditions be mutually agreed upon by the
County and petitioner.
Barry Jacobs, Chair
Donna S. Baker, CIVIC
Clerk to the Board