HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes - 10-30-2000APPROVED MAY 1.2001
MINUTES
ASSEMBLY OF GOVERNMENTS
ORANGE COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
CARRBORO BOARD OF ALDERMEN
CHAPEL HILL TOWN COUNCIL
HILLSBOROUGH TOWN COMMISSIONERS
OCTOBER 30, 2000
The Orange County Board of Commissioners met on Monday, October 30, 2000 at 7:30 p.m.
in the Boardroom of the Southern Human Services Center in Chapel Hill, North Carolina as part of an
Assembly of Governments meeting.
COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENT: Chair Moses Carey, Jr., and Commissioners
Margaret W. Brown, Alice M. Gordon, Barry Jacobs and Stephen H. Halkiotis
CARRBORO BOARD OF ALDERMEN PRESENT: Mayor Mike Nelson and Aldermen Allen
Spalt, Mark Dorosin, Jacquelyn Gist, Diana McDuffee and Joal Hall Broun
CARRBORO STAFF PRESENT: Town Manager Robert Morgan
CHAPEL HILL TOWN COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT: Mayor Rosemary Waldorf and Council
Members Flicka Bateman, Joyce Brown, Pat Evans, Kevin Foy, Bill Strom, Jim Ward, and Edith
Wiggins
CHAPEL HILL STAFF PRESENT: Town Manager W. Calvin Horton
HILLSBOROUGH TOWN COMMISSIONERS PRESENT: Mayor Horace Johnson and
Commissioner Mark Sheridan
HILLSBOROUGH STAFF PRESENT: Town Manager Eric Peterson
MEBANE CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT: Mayor Glendel Stephenson
MEBANE STAFF PRESENT: City Manager Robert Wilson
COUNTY ATTORNEY PRESENT: Geoffrey Gledhill
COUNTY STAFF PRESENT: County Manager John M. Link, Jr., Assistant County Manager
Rod Visser and Clerk to the Board Beverly A. Blythe (All other staff members will be identified
appropriately below)
NOTE: ALL DOCUMENTS REFERRED TO IN THESE MINUTES ARE IN THE PERMANENT
AGENDA FILE IN THE CLERK'S OFFICE. ALL RECORDINGS OF THE MEETING
WILL BE KEPT FOR 5 YEARS.
Introductions were made.
POTENTIAL JOINT CAPITAL FUNDING FOR PARKS REPORT
Environment and Resource Conservation Director David Stancil made the presentation. In summary
he said that this report was the culmination of four years of work on parks and recreation in the
County. The work includes three reports. All of the reports recommend exploring coordinated capital
funding and note the potential for Orange County to take the lead in future joint park facilities that
serve the population of the entire County. A memorandum of agreement for co-location of facilities,
the towns, and both school systems has been developed by the Schools and Land Use Councils and
has been agreed to by a number of parties. The agreement calls for exploring opportunities to co-
locate whenever new public facilities are planned.
The sum total of park projects is $63 million, with $47.5 million not funded at this time.
2
The sources of funding for park projects include Capital Investment Plan (CIP), bonds, installment
financing, grants, school/park reserve fund, land development/payments-in-lieu, and impact fees.
The 1999 report suggested the County's new Lands Legacy program as a vehicle for collaboration on
parkland acquisitions.
Three potential actions are suggested: 1) a memorandum of agreement on capital funding for parks;
2) an agreement on a conceptual future parks map; and 3) a bond to develop plans for parks and
open space.
The Inter-Governmental Parks Work Group begins meeting next month to explore collaborative
opportunities. If a bond referendum is pursued, parks and recreation should be included in the
planning. Finally, the staffs could begin preliminary work on a draft Memorandum of Agreement
(MOA) to address joint parks capital funding and development.
Flicka Bateman asked for an explanation of how the County would take the lead and coordinate the
necessary activities. David Stancil said that, as land becomes scarce in the city limits, properties
outside of the city limits would be considered. This lead role could be spelled out in the MOA.
Mayor Johnson said that he feels that it is appropriate for the County to take the lead. He said that
the growth patterns indicate that the growth will continue to the north. He also feels that the County
would be the appropriate agency to facilitate the plan to fund the parks and to acquire properties.
Diana McDuffee said that she feels that the County would be the appropriate entity to take the lead.
She said that during the last year there was a concentrated study done on soccer facilities and that
the Board of County Commissioners would be discussing this report on Wednesday evening,
November 1St
Jackie Gist said that she has been impressed over the last five years with the intergovernmental
cooperation in developing the three reports on parks and recreation. She feels that this is a model of
cooperation for other things. She is concerned about the pool issue where the estimated cost has
escalated. She would like to see an intergovernmental group formed including the towns, the County,
the school systems and the YMCA to discuss the pool issue.
Kevin Foy agrees with Jackie Gist and said that when the Town Council found out the cost for a pool
for Chapel Hill, they found out that a lot of the demand for the pool was driven by the schools and they
were trying to balance that with the SportsPlex. He said that the Town Council have asked that the
Intergovernmental Parks Work Group address the pool issue in November at their first meeting.
It was suggested that the YMCA should be asked to join the Intergovernmental Parks Work Group.
Bill Strom said that he feels that part of the reason that the 1997 bond issue was so successful was
that it had money for land banking and facility development. He feels it is important to land bank and
have money earmarked for facility development.
Pat Evans feels that the difficult issue will be equity because everyone pays Orange County taxes.
The issue will be how money is raised and dispersed.
Chair Carey said that the equity issue was something that could be addressed in the memorandum of
agreement. John Link said that this could be addressed the next time the committee meets.
Bob Morgan said that he does not feel that the jurisdictions will ever work out the equity issue but he
feels they can focus on solutions.
3
Mayor Waldorf does not feel there can be a solution unless the equity issue is somehow addressed.
She made reference to page 2 of the agenda packet where the three recommendations are offered
and said that she would hope they could move forward on the recommendations. However, she feels
that the equity issue needs to be resolved before moving forward. She said that the report was very
clear, but that there was no statement about the prior investment of each entity in parks and
recreation.
John Link said that he thinks discussions of equity can be pursued and that it may be well to define
equity on capital and operational sides.
Mayor Johnson said that the solution was to look at the population and prepare for the growth. He
said that there would be complaints no matter where a facility was built.
Joal Broun suggested that when developing facilities the work group think about the different groups
that will be served. She said that there are different groups with different recreational needs.
Chair Carey said that he sees the County taking the lead role in the acquisition and development of
large regional facilities.
As requested by Commissioner Brown, David Stancil gave some background information on the
Lands Legacy Program and what that would mean to park development and acquisition of land.
Pat Evans asked what the difference was between the school park reserve fund and lands legacy.
David Stancil said that the school park reserve fund was set up several years ago to specifically
acquire land for school or park use.
Commissioner Jacobs made reference to soccer and said that he hopes the Intergovernmental Parks
Work Group will also talk about site based management because in theory it is working, but in
practice it is difficult. When talking about the lands legacy program, one objective is to preserve open
space through keeping agriculture alive, which also includes purchase of conservation easements.
Also, the green tract is a 160-acre tract that the towns and the County own and which could serve all
jurisdictions.
Mark Sheridan said that one thing he has noticed in the last several years is that there has been an
energy and focus put on park development and it seems like there is some catch up work that needs
to be done with park development. He said that it has been very exciting to see that and he thinks the
citizens will respond positively to this focus.
Commissioner Gordon made reference to the County taking the lead and said that she feels it is
important that we all coordinate and cooperate. If the County tries for a bond referendum for the fall of
2001, she would advocate that a bond package be developed that would be equitable. She is very
pleased that there has been this forward movement toward cooperation.
Joal Broun asked when the work group would give a recommendation for the bond to go forward.
John Link said that the initial request for inclusion in the bond would need to be formulated for the
Board of County Commissioners to consider by the end of January. The final decision needs to be
made in May.
Mayor Waldorf said that she feels it is important for the municipalities to communicate specific
recommendations to both the Intergovernmental Parks Work Group and the County Commissioners.
Jim Ward said that he would like for some type of soccer facilities to be considered for a bond issue.
He also mentioned economy of scale and said that there should be some cooperation on the items
that are purchased (i.e., lawnmowers, etc.).
4
Commissioner Halkiotis made reference to the Innovation and Efficiency Committee and said that
purchasing on an economy of scale is something the committee is discussing. He feels that the two
School Boards should be invited to the County's Assembly of Government meetings. Chair Carey
said that the schools boards were invited.
Commissioner Halkiotis emphasized that, because of the turf protection issue, especially at the school
levels, an agreement needs to be developed so that everyone understands who will use the
recreational fields. He feels that all areas of the County are interested in soccer fields and that
support will come from all.
Jackie Gist suggested that there be a bond group made up of representatives from each board to look
at how a bond would work and the equity issues.
Commissioner Gordon said that there would be a Capital Needs Advisory Group put together for the
bond with representatives from the different jurisdictions. She said that the reason for the tight
timeframe for the bond has to do with the schools.
Chair Carey pointed out that the bond issue does not have to include everything that everyone wants
for parks and recreation. All of the park needs cannot be addressed within the next five years.
John Link said that by the end of January or first of February there needs to be some specific
functions outlined for inclusion in a bond referendum for November 2001. Also, having a separate
work group for a recreation bond issue is an idea that could be pursued.
Commissioner Jacobs said that the adoption of the Schools Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance will
commit everyone to some kind of regular and ongoing appropriations that are sufficient to meet school
needs. He made reference to an organization called the Conservation Trust for Public Land, which is
located in North Carolina and which specializes in helping local and state governments formulate
bond packages for these kinds of things. He is worried about not being ambitious enough and asking
for too little from the voters. He hopes that we try to bring in citizens that are concerned about things
like soccer.
Jim Ward asked that the Intergovernmental Parks Work Group look at other funding sources such as
the impact fee.
Mayor Waldorf asked if there was permission in the State of North Carolina to have a district parks
and recreation fee. She suggested looking into this -- maybe putting a very modest district tax to the
voters.
Allan Spalt said that another funding source that has fallen behind is the payment-in-lieu where the
developers can choose to pay a fee instead of providing for recreation.
There was consensus on each board proceeding with their discussions concerning the
recommendations of the Potential Joint Funding for Parks as stated in the report and exploring the
possibility of a specific bond committee to come back with a recommendation by the end of January
Mayor Waldorf said that each Board needs to talk about this among themselves and then as soon as
practical have the Managers schedule a meeting.
Allen Spalt said that there are some other co-location of facilities to think about besides schools and
parks. He urged that as land banking is considered that we look beyond the schools and parks.
5
Commissioner Gordon said that the memorandum of understanding contemplates co-locating other
facilities besides schools and parks.
With no further items to discuss, the meeting was adjourned at 8:55 p.m. The next regular meeting
will be held on November 1, 2000 at 7:30 p.m. in the F. Gordon Battle Courtroom in Hillsborough,
North Carolina.
Moses Carey, Jr., Chair
Beverly A. Blythe, CMC