HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda - 12-01-1998 - 10cORANGE COUNTY
BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
ACTION AGENDA ITEM ABSTRACT
Meeting Date: December 1, 1998
Action Agenda
Item No. gip„ C,
SUBJECT: 1997-98 Comprehensive Annual Financial Report
DEPARTMENT: Finance PUBLIC HEARING: (Y/N) No
BUDGET AMENDMENT: (Y/N) No
ATTACHMENT(S):
CAFR and Single Audit Reports
(Separate Cover)
INFORMATION CONTACT:
Ken Chavious Ext. 2453
TELEPHONE NUMBERS:
Hillsborough 732-8181
Chapel Hill 968-4501
Durham 688-7331
Mebane 227-2031
PURPOSE: To receive the Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR) and Single Audit
Report for the fiscal year ended June 30, 1998.
BACKGROUND: The CAFR covers all financial activity of the County for the 97-98 fiscal year
and the Single Audit Report focuses on grant compliance for the same fiscal year. Both reports
result from and annual audit of the County's financial records which occurred during the past
several months. Presentation of these reports is necessary in order to fulfill the requirements set
forth in Chapter 159-34 of the North Carolina General Statutes.
The results of the 1998 audit were very good. Undesignated fund balance in the general fund
reflects an increase over the prior year. This increase places the County well above the Local
Government Commission's minimum recommendation of 8%. In addition, year-end fund balance
surpasses the levels established in our budget guidelines. The County's financial condition
continues to strengthen with this sound fund balance position. The auditors found no instances of
material weakness in the County's internal control structure and have issued a positive opinion on
our financial statements. The auditors issued a letter of recommendation citing two issues related to
staff procedures. These are isolated instances for which procedures are in place to prevent
reoccurrence. There were no findings or questioned costs related to the Single Audit.
The County Finance Director will cover in more detail some of the highlights of the report and will
be available to answer any questions along with representatives of the County's certified public
accounts, Deloitte & Touche.
RECOMMENDATION(S): The Manager recommends that the Board receive the report for
information only.
X.
FINANCE DEPARTMENT
November 24, 1998
~c~/
The. Board of County Commissioners
Orange County, North Carolina
~` ~'.
V ~
~'•~~ a~a`'•
ORANGE COUNTY
NORTH CAROLINA
I am pleased to present you with a Comprehensive Annual Financial Report which
reflects very positive outcomes on the County's financial condition as well as the fiscal
processes and procedures followed by County staff. This report results from an annual
audit of the County's financial records that took place during the past several months.
The audit was performed by Deloitte and Touche, LLP. The attached letter outlines two
azeas noted by the auditor's in their review. These are isolated incidents for which
procedures aze currently in place to prevent reoccurrence.
Management Supervision and Review
This item represents review and approval of journal entries prior to input. Journal entries
aze manual entries that aze usually prepared to make corrections and/or to record
transactions that aze not computer generated. The majority of these entries are prepazed
by the staff accountant and aze usually routine from month to month. It is my
responsibility as Finance Director to review these entries prior to input. This review
normally takes place as entries are prepared throughout the month but was not performed
in the period mentioned by the auditors.
This issue has been discussed by stafly and a process is currently in place to insure that
this review takes place in periods when I face time constraints which impede my ability
to perform certain routine tasks. Since the majority of these entries are prepazed by the
staff accountant, another member of the Finance staff has been authorized to review and
approve the routine entries when I am unavailable.
rchasin
This item represents overpayment'to a cornractor. The overpayment was discovered and
corrected by the Purchasing Department, however the proper paperwork was not
forwarded to the Finance Department. As a result the Finance Department was unable to
make the appropriate journal entry reflecting the outcome.
208 SOUTH CAMERON ST + P.O. BOX 8181 • HILLSBOROUGH. NORTH CAROLINA • 919!732-8181
Since this was considered as an exchange of paperwork only with no money involved,
coupled with the fact the paperwork was received on the last day of the fiscal year,
normal communications did not occur. The Purchasing and Finance Departments work
together on a duly basis to resolve similar issues and this communication is normally
very effective. We believe this to be an isolated incident.
The staffs of both departments have been made awaze of this incident and the need to
continue communicating these matters more effectively.
As mentioned above, I am pleased with the positive outcome of this audit. The staffs
involved in the audit process are committed to continued accountability and award
winning financial reporting regarding the management of the County's financial
resources.
I will officially present the CAFR to you on December 1, 1998.
Yours truly,
.~
enneth T. Chavious
Finance Director
Attachments.
Deloitte &
Touche
Deloitte &Touche LLP Telephone: (919) 546-8000
~ Suite 1800 Telex: 4995716
First Union Capitol Center Facsimile: (919) 833-3276
150 Fayetteville Street Mall
P.O. Box 2778
Raleigh, North Carolina 27602-2778
October 2, 1998
The Board of County Commissioners
Orange County, North Carolina
In planning and performing our audit of the general purpose financial statements of Orange County
for the year ended June 30, 1998 (on which we have issued our report dated October 2, 1998), we
considered its internal control in order to determine our auditing procedures for the purpose of
expressing an opinion on the financial statements and not to provide assurance on the Company's
internal control. Such consideration would not necessarily disclose all matters in the Company's
internal control that might be material weaknesses under standards established by the American
Institute of Certified Public Accountants. A material weakness is a condition in which the design
or operation of one or more of the internal control components does not reduce to a relatively low
level the risk that misstatements caused by error or fraud in amounts that would be material in
relation to the financial statements being audited may occur and not be detected within a timely
period by employees in the normal course of performing their assigned functions. We noted no
matters involving the Company's internal control and its operations that we consider to be material
weaknesses as defined above.
We did note other matters related to the Company's internal control and certain other accounting or
administrative matters. Our principal observations and recommendations are summarized below.
MANAGEMENT SUPERVISION AND REVIEW
Journal entries made by Finance Department staff were not properly reviewed and approved by the
appropriate level of Finance Department management. The lack of approval appeared to be
isolated to a specific period of occurrence, the majority of findings during the month of May 1998.
These entries should be subject to review throughout the month, rather than only at month end to
ensure the consistent and proper recording of County journal entries throughout the year.
PURCHASING
The Finance Department and Purchasing Department both retain copies of the Application and
Certificate for Payment for all County purchases requiring purchase orders. During the current
fiscal year, for a specific contractor, an overpayment occurred. The contractor refunded a portion
of this overpayment, and retained the remaining payment for work to be performed. These
activities were all handled and maintained through the Purchasing Department. This information
DeloltteTouche
Tohmatsu
was not forwarded to the Accounts Payable department, and therefore the appropriate accounting
adjustments were not made. In addition, this payment represented the final application of a
contract, but the final Certificate for Payment was not obtained by the Accounts Payable, therefore
this contract was still carried as an open account at June 30, 1998. All construction payments
should accompany a Certificate for Payment that has been properly reviewed and authorized by the
Purchasing Department. In addition, all contract activity should be reported to the Finance
Department.
This report is intended solely for the information and use of the Board of County Commissioners,
management, and officials of state and federal agencies. However, this report is a matter of public
record, and distribution is not limited.
We will be pleased to discuss these comments with you and, if desired, to assist you in
implementing any of the suggestions.
Yours truly,
~~v ~ ~~- L~l~°
Deloitte &
Touche
Deloitte &Touche LLP
Suite 1800
First Union Capitol Center
150 Fayetteville Street Mall
P.O. Box 2778
Raleigh, North Carolina 27602-2778
October 2, 1998
The Board of County Commissioners
Orange County, North Carolina
Telephone: (919) 546-8000
Telex: 4995716
Facsimile: (919) 833-3276
In planning and performing our audit of the general purpose financial statements of Orange County
for the year ended June 30, 1998 (on which we have issued our report dated October 2, 1998), we
considered its internal control in order to determine our auditing procedures for the purpose of
expressing an opinion on the financial statements and not to provide assurance on the Company's
internal control. Such consideration would not necessarily disclose all matters in the Company's
internal control that might be material weaknesses under standards established by the American
Institute of Certified Public Accountants. A material weakness is a condition in which the design
or operation of one or more of the internal control components does not reduce to a relatively low
level the risk that misstatements caused by error or fraud in amounts that would be material in
relation to the financial statements being audited may occur and not be detected within a timely
period by employees in the normal course of performing their assigned functions. We noted no
matters involving the Company's internal control and its operations that we consider to be material
weaknesses as defined above.
We did note other matters related to the Company's internal control and certain other accounting or
administrative matters. Our principal observations and recommendations are summarized below.
MANAGEMENT SUPERVISION AND REVIEW
Journal entries made by Finance Department staff were not properly reviewed and approved by the
appropriate level of Finance Department management. The lack of approval appeared to be
isolated to a specific period of occurrence, the majority of findings during the month of May 1998.
These entries should be subject to review throughout the month, rather than only at month end to
ensure the consistent and proper recording of County journal entries throughout the year.
PURCHASING
The Finance Department and Purchasing Department both retain copies of the Application and
Certificate for Payment for all County purchases requiring purchase orders. During the current
fiscal year, for a specific contractor, an overpayment occurred. The contractor refunded a portion
of this overpayment, and retained the remaining payment for work to be performed. These
activities were all handled and maintained through the Purchasing Department. This information
DeloitteTouche
Tohmatsu
was not forwarded to the Accounts Payable department, and therefore the appropriate accounting
adjustments were not made. In addition, this payment represented the final application of a
contract, but the final Certificate for Payment was not obtained by the Accounts Payable, therefore
this contract was still carried as an open account at June 30, 1998. All construction payments
should accompany a Certificate for Payment that has been properly reviewed and authorized by the
Purchasing Department. In addition, all contract activity should be reported to the Finance
Department.
This report is intended solely for the information and use of the Board of County Commissioners,
management, and officials of state and federal agencies. However, this report is a matter of public
record, and distribution is not limited.
We will be pleased to discuss these comments with you and, if desired, to assist you in
implementing any of the suggestions.
Yours truly,
D~~ ' ~~ ~