Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes - 19770705~~~ Ms. Riddle suggested that the Advisory Councils spend 6 months, from January to June, 1978, or from January til September, 1978, studying the maps and overlays which the Planning Department already has. Going through an educational process in terms of what land use planning really is and gathering input from local citizens. Hopefully, by the second half of 1978, the Councils would be ready to look at a total land use plan. Mr. Efland suggested that the Technical Advisory Committee and the Advisory Councils in the local townships work closely together in develop- ing a land use plan. Nls. Riddle stated that the Advisory Councils would have use of maps and overlays which are now in the Planning Department. They will have input from the~task force and be ready to come together with a draft land classification plan by September, 1978. Chairman Whitted stated that by September of 1978, the two Boards would have hammered out a draft of a land classification plan and be ready to go before a public hearing. From July til December, 1977, the Advisory Councils would be getting into place. The Subdivision Regulations are now in the hands of the Commissioners Chairman Whitted asked that the Planning Staff review their daily schedule and manpower and to relate this inform~.tion back to the Board. The two Boards will then schedule another meeting. Chairman Whitted requested that the Planning Board consider at some future point the extraterritorial jurisdiction request of the Town of Chapel Hill. The Planning Staff will provide the Planning Board with the.maps and resource materials. Ben Lloyd spoke against the action of the two Boards. He questioned the parliamentary procudures of a previous meeting of the Planning Board. This matter was referred to the Gounty Attorney for research. Other citizens spoke against the proposed 5ubd'ivision Ordinance. The Chairman asked if anyone else wished to speak and no one came forth. The meeting was adjourned. ichard E. Wh t e , airman Agatha Johnson, Clerk ORANGE COUNTX BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS JULY 5, 1977 The Orange County Board of Commissioners met in. regular session on Tuesday, July 5, 1977, at 10:00 a, m „ in the Commissioners'' Room of the Courthouse in Hillsborough, N. C. Present were Chairman Richard Whitted, Commissioners Norman rustaveson, Jan Pinney, Norman Walker, and Donald Willhoit. Staff members present were County Administrator, S. M. Gattis, Finance Director, Neal Evans, and Agatha Johnson, Clerk to the Board, Jeffrey Gledhill, County Attorney was also present. Chairman Whitted opened the meeting by referring to Ttem 1 on the agenda: Persons not on this agenda having business to transact with the Board of Commissioners should make their presence known at this time, James J. Freeland stated that he was present, along with other citizens to ask questions regarding the new tax rate. The consensus of the Board was to hear from the gathered group at this time. ~~~: Dallas Lang requested that the Board of Commissioners consider lowering the tax rate and some salary increases. Earl Stanfield stated that he was a young dairy farmer in Orange County and was concerned about the impact of the tax increase on the dairy industry. Josephine Barbour stated that she was opposed to the $75,000 to Chapel Hill Municipal Support for Recreation. She stated that the Health Depart- ment's budget should be looked-into further. William Mishoe stated that the tax increase was taking money out of the pockets of people who are on fixed incomes. Glen Cates stated that the "County was spending money which they do not have to bu_y things which are not needed ,to impress people who they do not like". A Mr. Davis read a statement from his father, Mr, C~ PI, David, who was not present. The statement spoke against the proposed tax increase. Ben Lloyd presented to members of the Board a comparison of depart- ment heads' salaries of adjoining counties as compared to Orange County. Mr. Lloyd stated that the salaries of Orange County Department Heads' were out of line. He stated that some of the expenditures included in the budget were_out of order, such as renovation of the jail and the Grady Brown School Building. He added that if this is to be donex it should b.e done in segments and as the money is available, I~x. Lloyd requested that the Commissioners implement a temporary budget on which to operate and that the renovation of the jail and the Grady Brown Schoel and the salaries be reanalyzed. He suggested that a public hearing be held to clarify to citizens the need for the renovations and the basis for the salary in- creases. Commissioner Walker stated that since salaries were not discussed at the June 14th public hearing, he would moved that another public hearing be held for discussion of the renovation of the Grady Brown School, renava~- - tion of the jail, and regarding salaries and wages paid county employees Mrs. Barbour requested that Mr. Walker include in his motion further discussion of the Municipal Support Recreation Program in Chapel Hill and the County Health Department budgets. Mr. Davis suggested that the Board go through the entire budget and attempt to cut "the fat" from the budget, especially in the building and . rents area. Discussion ensued concerning the salary increases recommended in the 1977-1978 budget. It was pointed out that State Personnel had reviewed the jobs of county employees and had made recommendations of salary in- creases. The Board of Commissioners had considered the longevity, salary level aver a number of years which had been grossly inadequate for the responsibilities involved in administration of County business. Further discussion ensued concerning the needs of Orange. County and the expenditures of the County. Commissioner Willhoit pointed out that when voters approved the school bond referendum last fall, this resulted in a 74 tax increase to cover the cost of the bonds. The County's plans are to use the 7~ in- crease the first year to upgrade county facilities. The additional 3G is for the increase in operating cost in the two school systems He stated that presently the jail is on hold until the law is clarified as to what will be required of the County. Regarding the Health Department, Mr. Willhoit explained that the $379,000 will result in better service. He added that the increase from $144,000 of last year was that the $144,000 is a net figure to the District. $8Dx000 would have been added to the $144,000 had Orange County stayed in the District and if the District had maintained programs at their present level. This would have brought last year's total to $224,000. The difference between $379x000 this year and $224,000 of last year is $155,000 which is offset by the income from State and Federal Grants of $127,000. This would leave an actual increase of $28,000 for establishing a Health Department. ~~. Mr. Willhoit stated that the Municipal Support far recreation in Chapel Hill and Carrboro is to enable the towns to hold the gyms in the schools open for use of all citizens in the County during off school hours. He added that the County and the two towns would be making long range plans for a complete cooperative recreation programs in the future. Bobby Nichols, a local farmer, stated that he felt land value had been inflated, and that he was not being taxed on what he could produce. He stated that he felt this should be taken into consideration when the County tax reate is set. Commissioner Willhoit asked how many farmerB were taking advantage of having the land taxed based on its use, instead of the market value? Mr. Nichols replied that most farmers did not want to market their land. He added that he had checked out the taxation based on land use as opposed to the market value and that there is no sufficient savings. Chairman Whitted spoke of the jail renovation. He stated that he felt it was more prudent to appropriate money this year for the jail. He stated that the County would know within six months what the State require-- ments for a jail will be and he felt the jail should be taken care of this year, as the capital needs of the school systems will continue year after year. Ben Lloyd asked that the jail be dropped completely and wait until another year to increase taxes. Further discussion ensued regarding the 1977-78 budget and the pro- posed renovation of the jail and the Grady Brown School building. Chairman Whitted declared that the original motion of N!r. walker had died for lack of a second. Commissioner P7alker then moved that the Board honor the requet of those present and that a public hearing be scheduled for discussion of the renovation of the jail, Grady Brown School building and discussion of salaries and wages. Commissioner Pinney asked the County Attorney if the budget was finally adopted on June 22, 1977, or if it is adopted whin the budget - ordinance is adopted. The County Attorney stated that the County was operating under a tentative budget until the Budget Ordinance is adopted. Commissioner Pinney then seconded Commissioner T4alker's motion. The Chairman called for a vote on the motion. Voting aye were Commis- . sinners Walker and Pinney. Voting nay were Commissioners Gustaveson, Whitted and Willhoit. The motion was declared defeated. Discussion ensued concerning salary increases pxopased far County employees. Commissioner Gustaveson stated that it was legal for Board's to go into executive session to discuss different topics. He added that the opinion of those that the .executive session was illegal was based on one person's opinion, that there are different opinions among attorneys as to what can be considered in executive session. Mr. Gustaveson stated that this Board of Commissioners has been accessable to the public and has been willing to listen to what the people have to say. He stated that this meeting today is evident of that fact. Further, Mr. Gustaveson stated that he would defend the budget, that he feels it is a good budget. That planning for over two years included the cost savings by remodeling Grady Brown instead of building new buildings, Commissioner f4alker stated that he did support the schools, however, he felt there were other areas within the budget which could have been cut to keep the tax rate down. He spoke of the executive session and stated that the Board was led into the session with the idea of talking about job performance. Job performance was not discussed' Faut salaries and wages were discussed. He stated that he felt this was the azea that was illegal. He stated that wages were a public mattez~ and 1~^x. Walker then moved that another public hearing be scheduled to discuss salaries and wages. Discussion ensued. Commissioner Walker asked that his motion be amended to include that the budget ordinance not be adopted until after the people have been heard. ~~~- Commissioner Pinney stated that he did not mind a public hearing on salaries, however, he would not want a public hearing a.~ it would turn into an inquisition of those persons involved. He added that there are personalities involved. The motion died for lack of a second. Discussion continued. Commissioner Walker asked that h.e be excused from the meeting to attend a funeral. Mr. Walker was excused. The meeting was adjourned for lunch. Following lunch, the Board reconvened, and the Chairman referred to Item 2 on the agenda: Minutes of the Board meetinq.s held on June 21, June 22, June 23, and June 29 are submitted for consideration, The June 21, 1977 minutes were reviewed and upon motion of Commis- sioner Pinney, seconded by Commissioner taillhoit, the June 21, 1977 min- utes were approved. The June 22, 1977 minutes were reviewed and upon motion of Commis- sioner Pinney, seconded by Commissioner Gustaveson, the June 22, 1977 minutes were approved. The June 23, 1977 minutes were reviewed and the County Manager was asked to bring to the attention of the Social Services Department, the concern of neglect of homes for the aged and infirmed, and to prepare some statement regarding the care of these individuals. Upon motion of Commissioner Pinney, seconded by Commissioner Gustaveson, it was moved and adopted to approve the June 23, 1977 minutes. The June 29, 1977 minutes were reviewed and upon motion of Commis- sioner Pinney, seconded by Commissioner Willhoit, the minutes of June 29, 1977 were approved. Item 3 on the Agenda: Consideration of recommendations from the County Planning Board relating to the proposed Subdivision Ordinance • and township planning ccuncils. Chairman tahitted stated that the Planning Board had submitted two recommendations to the County Commissioners. (1) The Planning Board has recommended that the amendments to the Subdivision Regulations be extended in the Chapel Hill and Eno Townships, and (2) that the Sub- division Ordinance not be extended county-wide until the Advisory Councils are in place. Chairman Whitted asked that the Board discuss the subdivision amendments. Commissioner.Gustaveson referred to Section VI22 A - Amendments. He was advised by the County Attorney that this wording came from the Zoning Ordinance, however, the zoning Ordinance requires that any inte- rested citizens can sent a proposal .to the Planning Board for considera- tion. The Planning Board then discusses the proposal at its quarterly public hearing. It is envisioned that the same procedure would apply in this Ordinance. Commissioner Pinney stated that he had problems with this section being taken from the Zoning Ordinance since it spoke to rezoning and a petition for rezoning is an amendment of the Zoning Ordinance, as in this Subdivision Ordinance, a petition for rezoning does not apply be- cause this is a Subdivision Ordinance. He also stated that he had pro blems with reguiring 10 people to petition the Planning Board. Discussion ensued. Chairman Whitted stated that he felt this section was a mechanism for citizens to petition the Planning Board to make changes in the Subdivision Ordinance. The Board agreed that the language should be changed to indicate that a request from one (1). citizen can open the process for amendment to the Subdivision Ordinance. Section IV B 6: Reservation of Space for Utilities ~ Dj,acussion ensued. Chairman Whitted stated that the Ordinance would not require any one to give up any particular easement, but does have th.e ra;ght to negoti~ ate with utility companies. However, if someone is subdividing large tracts, the developer must provide easements for utilities to lots which he proposes to develop. c ,-..- ~.: ~.. The County Attorney stated that the Ordinance left open the details for negotiation between the utility company and the developer. Commissioner Whitted stated that he felt the Ordinance needed language to make this clear. Commissioner Pinney suggested that item (c) be added to this section setting forth terms for utility easements. Commissioner Willhoit suggested that the first line in this section "Where several utilities are available and can be anticipated......" ... _.. that "and" be changed to "or". Under Section.II2-D-4: Preliminary Plan Approval, some discussion ensued regarding the review process of the various agencies. Commissioner Willhoit moved that the amendments to the Subdivision Ordinance be extended to Chapel Hi11 and Eno Townships. Commissioner Gustaveson asked that the County Attorney make the appropriate changes in the wording in those sections mentioned before the amendments are finally approved. Commissioner Willhoit withdrew his motion. The County Attorney was requested to make the changes pointed out. Commissioner Willhoit suggested that a change be made to Section IV B S b:. Lot Layouts. This should read, "Upon recommendation of the Planning Board and approval of the County Commissioners, the construction....." Discussion ensued regarding the functions of the Advisory Councils in the various townships. Commissioner Willhoit stated that his understanding of the role of the Advisory Councils was to aid the Planning Board in developing a land use plan for that particular area, taking into account the unique needs, and desires of the residents of the area. The role of - the Advisory Council and not to advise on the .development of the Sub- division Ordinance, unless they so desire. Chairman Whitted stated that the Planning Staff will review their work program for the next months and submit to the County Commissioners a time schedule for setting up Advisory Councils. The County Commissioners and the Planning Board will then schedule another work session at that time. Anew work plan has not been adopted to this date.. Commissioner Whitted asked the Board to discuss the second recommenda- tion of the Planning Board, that extension of the Subdivision Ordinance be delayed until the Advisory Councils are in place. Commissioner Gustaveson stated that the upcoming work session will reorganize priorities and that he felt a date should be set to extend the Subdivision Ordinance county-wide, and to get on with the main task, in the critical areas, of developing a land use plan and a zoning map which is the primary task of the Advisory Councils. He suggested that some mechanism be developed for education of .citizens regarding the subdivision regulations. Mr. Gustaveson suggested that a date of mid-September be set to consider adoption of~'the Subdivision Regulations county-wide. He added that the Subdivision Regulations should not necessarily be tied with the Advisory Councils. Further, he stated that the present work plan of the Planning Staff not change. Chairman Whitted stated that he was in favor of going along with the recommendation from the Planning Board, that the Subdivision Regulations not be implemented into the townships which do not currently have the sub- division Regulations. He added that he felt sometime limit should be set as to when the appropriate time should be far this Board to consider the question of extending the Regulations county-wide. He added that he felt the time should be between 90 and 12D days. Mr. Whitted stated that an effort should be made to clear up distortions so that citizens will know what the Ordinance is intended to do. Commissioner Pinney stated that he had no problems with the Planning $aard's recommendation, that he would like to see the Advisory Crouncils set up as soon as possible and he feels this could be done in 120 days. (~v .) Gommissioner Willhoit suggested that the Board give .specific dizec- tions to the Planning Staff, and that a xe.y~.eFt o~ pxpg~e~s ~*}ade ~.n establishing the Councils be made at each Gommissioner~s meet7.ng. Mrs Willhoit added that he felt the establishing of the Councils could be done fairly quickly. It was pointed out that when the Advisory Councils were first conceived last December, the primary function was to develop the land use plan and the zoning map. The recommendation of the Planning Boaz'd to the Commissioners is that the Advisory Councils study the Subdivision Regulations before extending county-wide. Gommissioner Gustaveson recommended that the third Tuesday 7,n ..: September be scheduled as the time to consider implementing the SuFa~ division Regulations county-wide and that this implementing would be no sooner than 30 days from the thixd Tuesday, but could be longer if -° there is a need for further discussion Upon motion of Commissioner Pinney, seconded by Commissioner ~7hitted, it was moved and adopted that the Board will review the proposed Subs division Regulations on September 20, 1977, an progress on the Advisory Councils and the educational program. Concerning the amendments to the Subdivision Ordinance, Comm3.ssioner Willhoit moved that the County Attorney review the proposed changes to the amendments, clarify the changes with the Planning Board, have the document retyped and then submit again to the Commissioners for approval. This motion died for lack of a second, The County Attorney cited sertain problems he had with the changes to the amendments. Section III-D-4, the wording was changed to read, "The following agennies shall review and certify areas of responsibility...." Section IV B 6, Subsection (c) will be added and will read.... "It is not the intend of this section that the terms of any easement or way required above be dictated by Orange County. Any such terms and conditions may be negotiated between the developer/land owner and utility companies, provided however, that where public water and sewer are re- gired for approval the Planning Board may require an instrument executed by the developer/land owner and utility company setting forth said terms and conditions at the time the preliminary plan is reviewed by the Planning Board." The new wording for Section Vx22-A: Amendments is as follows: "...initiated by the Board of Commissioners, by the County P..lanning Board, or by petition of any citizen of Orange County. After due con- sideration, the Planning Board may initiate the amendment provers...." Commissioner Gustaveson stated that he felt the recommendation of the Planning Board to implememt the amendment in Chapel Hill and Eno Townsfii_ps by July 19, 1977 is too soon and recommended that implementation be effective after the August meeting of the Planning Board. Commissioner Gustaveson then moved that the amendments to the Sub- division Ordinance be effective in Chapel Hill and Eno Township after the August meeting of the Planning Board -August 16,1977. Commissioner Willhoit seconded the motion. Commissioner Pinney stated that he owned 40 acres of land in Chapel Hill Township and he saw no problems with the Ordinance hurting his land and he would vote for the implementation of the Ordinance. Commissioners .. Pinney called for the question. The Chairman called for a vote on the motion, and all members of the Board voted aye. The motion was declared passed. Mr. Gledhill brought to the attention of the Board a question which was raised at a previous meeting regarding the vote of the Planning Board. He stated that the Planning Board establsihed their awn rules as to whether or not a member could abstain from voting. ~~_ Chairman Whitted referred to Item 10: The Manager will comment on a proposed relocation of the Central Dispatch Center. The agenda attachment stated that the previous decision to locate the EMS Dispatch Center at Hillsborough now seemed impractical due to (1) the sale of the UNC Telephone System to Southern Bell, (2) State Utility commission Regulations prohibits voice transmission aver non- . utility awned microwave, and (3) the Tawn of Chapel Hill has agreed to join the system and to turn its dispatch center and equipment over to the County for center use. These changes have altered the previous position and it is now recommended that the central dispatch center be located in Chapel Hill. Arrangements have been worked out which will separate the communciation center from other activities in the police building. Chairman Whitted recognized Flora Garrett, Information Officer for EMS System. Mrs. Garrett stated that Orange County would have the best EMS System in the State, and that the System would dispatch to all parts of the County. She added that there did not seem to be. a problem with the location of the system. Commissioner Pinney stated that one issue of concern he had was that dispatchers working on all shifts be familiar with all pax'ts of the County. Mrs. Garrett stated that this is one area in which dispatchers will be trained. It was pointed out that the start up time for the EMS System is January ]., 1978. The Commissioners agreed to set a date to go to Greensboro to look at the Greensboro system as soon as practical after the 'first Monday in August. Item 4: The Manager recommends approal of a contract providing legal services to the IV-D Child Support Program with Winston-Coleman and Bernholz. Upon motion of Commissioner Pinney, seconded by Commissioner Gustavesor it was moved and adopted to approve the IV-D Child Support Contract with Winston,Coleman and Bernholz. (For copy of Contract between Orange County and Winston, Coleman and Bernholz, see page 29Sof this book..) Ttem 5: The Manager recommends approval of an agreement to extend an existing contract with the Chapel Hill Housing Authority for provision of Section 8 administrative services for one year effective July 1, 1977, Upon motion of Commissioner Pinney, seconded by commissioner Gustavesor it was moved and adopted to approve the contract with the Chapel Hi11 Housing Authority for provision of Section 8 Services. (Far copy of Section 8 Contract see page 299 of this book.) Chairman Whitted referred to Item 6: The Manager recommends execu- tion of a three year lease with Joe Denson for 1,000 square feet of office space at $200 per month. The agenda attachment stated that the County Manager had looked for appropriate space in Hillsborough for additional office space and the only available space is on Churton Street, owned by Mr. Denson. Mr. Gattis recommends the ABC Policy, the Magistrates and the Probation Counselor, all located on the east side of the bottom floor of the Old Courthouse, be moved from their present locations to the space owned by Mr. Denson,. and that the data processing agency be located in the old Courthouse. Discussion ensued. Upon motion of Commissioner Gustaveson, seconded by Commissioner Willhoit, it was moved and adopted that the County Manager would decide what agencies are to be located in particular areas. Item 7: Appointments - A. The Town of Chapel Hill recommends Alderman Thomas Gardner be reappointed as its representative to the County EMS Council. Upon motion of Commissioner Pinney, seconded by Commissioner Willhoit, it was moved and adopted to reappoint Alderman Thomas Gardner as Chapel ~:. Hill's representative to the County EMS Council. B. The position of first alternate on the Orange County Board of Adjustment is vacant. Commissioner Pinney asked that he be excused to make a telephone call to inquire if a certain party would be willing to serve in this capacity. C. The term of Commissioner Walker has expired on the County Board of Social Services. Upon motion of Commissioner Gustaveson, seconded by Commissioner - [aillhoit, it was moved that Commissioner Pinney be named by acclamation to the Social Services Board. D. One County Commissioner should be named to the Board of Directors of JANUS HOUSE. Commissioner Pinney stated that he would like to inquire further into the requirment of this appointment. This appointment was deferred. E. The terms of David McFarland and Lucien Sellet, as County Appointees to the Chapel Hill Board of Adjustments have expired. The Clerk was requested to inquire as to whether or not Mr. McFarland and Ms. Sellet would be willing to serve in this capacity for another term, This item was deferred. ztem 8: The County Recreation Advisory Council has requested a meeting with the Board of County Commissioners to discuss long range goals and planning. Chairman Whitted referred to Itme 11: Plats for Consideration. Chairman Whitted introduced Chris Edwards, a member of the Planning Staff. Mr. Edwards referred to the final plat of Sedgefield. ?'his property is grapased to be dived into five sections totaling 111 lots. The land is located on Weaver Dairy Road and will be served by this road. Storm water and utility easements needed are shown on the plat. All lots do conform to set back requirements. This plat was approved by the Planning Board on the condition that all lots perk according to Health Department requirements. This will be started in July, 1977. The developer states that if some lots do not perk, those lots will be conbined. He stated that the proposed I-90, Alternate LA would ao directly through this subdivision, and if this alternate is accepted, the project will be abandoned. Upon motion of Commissioner Pinney, seconded by Commissioner Gustaveson, it was moved and adopted to approve the final plat of Sedgefireld with the condition that all 7.ots perk according to Health Department standards. A. Springhill Forest: This proposal is to split a 58 acre tract into 14 lots served by a public road. This property lies off Jones Ferro Road. Mr. Edwards informed the Board that an agreement had been worked out between the developer and the Sedimentation Erosion Control Officer, This plat was approved .on the condition that a 100 foot set back from the creek be observed on Lots 1, 2, 3, and 14, and that Lots 1 and 14 use the interior road for access. a Commissioner Gustaveson cuestioned the building site on lot 1. Mr. Edwards stated that sufficient room was available for building on lot 1. Upon motion of Commissioner Pinney, seconded by Commissioner Whitted, it was moved and adopted to approve the final plat for Springhill Forest. C. ~7ackson Property - Final Plat. This proposes the division of a tract into 60 lots of 5 to 10 acres each with two "Class C" interior roads serving the lots not served by St. Mary's Road. The conditions on the Preliminary Plan included a 100 foot set back for all lots crossed by Buck Quarter Creek and Lots 1, 5, 16, and 15 use the private roads for access. Each lot must observe 100 foot set back requirements. Upon motion of Commissioner Pinne ~~ a,t was m ~ ~~ owed and adopted that y~ Sec°nded by Commissioner Gustaveson, on the aforementioned conditians~ final plat of Jackson property be a pproved D• Hideaway Estates: This preliminary Plat of land is Hk'Y- 86, North of Blackwood Stations. The develo allowed t4 serve the 6 acr located on acre lots are ° lots by a Class C Private rreadsuntilt he be road. Platted. At which time the one The Health DePart,~nent has given preliminarill be served b easements will be shown on the f' Y a Public this preliminar anal plat. The Planning Boardd storm water Slate Standardsywhentthe one acreition that all roads has a - that be constructedPtooved proper setback from streams lots are approved and storm ~ and with the condition water easements be observed. -- Upon motion of Commissioner Gustaveson Pinney, it was moved and adopted to a ~ seconded b Hideaway Estates with the PProve the Y Commissioner recommended conditionspofliminary plat of E- James J, the Planning Board, tract into six Freeland - This preliminar private toad. Thes of 3 ~0 5 acres each, Y plan .~s tc split a The lots v,,o 58 a yea says there wi Property is located off gR uld be served b a private road be no problems with septic tanks 010 The Health De Lots will be served bent i~ it waspmovedtand of Commissioner Pinne Freeland with theacondition a y' seconded by Commissioner Gustaveson, pprove the preliminary plan of James ,7. the way out to that the 60 foot ri ht the State Road and the conditiongthatf wa crossing be constructed. Y be secured all the proper railroad F• Price Creek Mx'- Edwards stated ~ Revision to a Planned Unit Development. present location in that the plans were to move the swimmin This has caused the slighttmov~entaofbe used"in a 9'POO1 from its A common lots to allowolare heating system. garage area will serve all £our houses and room for the the existin P°ol. Upon motion of Commissioner Pinne g house. it was moved and adopted to Y, seconded b aPProve the revised plan formpricenCreek1lhoit, I"Sr• Edwards asked the Board to considered this a preliminary plan. plat (Price Creek) as Upon motion of Commissioner Pinney, seconded b Gustaveson, it was moved and adopted to a Price Creek, y Commissioner pprove the preliminary plat of Chairman whitted referred again to Item 7, alternate on the Orange County Board of Adjustment is vacant. (b) The position of first yacance. Commissioner Pinney offered the name of Regina Nobblitt to £ill this Upon motion of Commissioner pinne Gustaveson, it was moved and ~'~ seconded b alternate to the adopted that Regina Nobblimmlb~ioner Orange County Board of Adjustment, named as first Item 9; Commissioner Norman Gustaveson will discuss implement the Human Services Conference Proposed for the F,allnofn9 to Mr- Gustaveson stated that for 1977. have talked about setting us some mechanismme various a Services Conferonco- gencies in the County committee He Proposed that the conference bekorg °n a Human to be appointed by various count to providing human services, as well as Y departments whichnaredrelated private $uman service groups. He suggested that the format the 1975 Growth of the conference be similar to board members Options Conference. Participants in ~ staff personnel the ConferencehWill be who are concerned with the ~ and elected officials from wi ices groups would include Ietear1ty °f human services. Privatehhumanes~runty, of women Voters, as w Church Council, united Fund Council on A ell as others, County related agencies wouldhe Bing, EMS and others. League include Some points to be long range Plannin discussed at the conference are some mechanism £or coordinatin g in the human services area and agencies. the delivery of human services in' and some technique for the County by the Departments .-' - Mr. Gustaveson stated that the function of the Planning Committee is to organize and refine the format in addressing these two broad areas. He spoke further o£ the need far ways to assess human services in the County, a need for ways to recognize gaps in services, to see what is Bing provided and being utilized, and what is needed in the future in determining priorities. The Planning Gommittee should be composed of one member appointed from the following departments or agencies: Social Services, Mental Health, Orange County Health Aepartment, Agriculture Extension Service, Chapel Hill Human Services Department, Joint Orange Chatham Community Action, One member from the Board of County Gor-~missioners, one member of the znter-Church Council and one member from the County p?anager's staff. Representatives from Hillsborough and Carrbora's unit of governments will be asked to sit on the Planning Committee. Commissioner Gustaveson asked that this committee be set up to begin planning for the conference. Commissioner Flillhoit suggested October 2R and 29, 1977 be scheduled as the time for the conference. Upon motion of Commissioner Gustaveson, seconded by Commissioner [gillhoit, it was moved and adopted to endorse the concept of the Human Services Planning Committee and to schedule October 28 and 29 as the designated time for the conference. A letter is to be forwarded to the various departments and agencies. Commissioner [~7hitted stated that he would like it to be clear that this is ndt a move to establish a County Department of Human Services. The meeting was adjourned. L, is rd F. - t ed, airman Agatha Johnson, C7:erk s :-., - . .; .~ G: ~WINSTON, CDLEMAN II AND BERNHOLZ ATTOp NEYS AT LAW CHAPEL MILL, N_ G. HILLSBOR Ol1GH, N. C. NORTH CAROLINA ORANGE GOUPdTY , THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into the ~daY of ` ` 1977, by and between WI'_QSTON, COLE:''_'-" < and_,B'ERL`7HOLZ, attorneys at law, Orange County, North Carolina, hereinafter referred to as ATTORNEYS and ORANGE COUNTY, North Carolina, hereinafter referred to as COUNTX: ' WITNESSETH: ~ WHEREAS, the COUNTY has need of legal services not otherwise provided bV the ATTORNEYS ar other County agencies, j in connection with matters which arise out of the COUNTX'S administration of the Child Su Wort and Enforcement Procrram, Title IV-D of the Social Security Act under Article 9, Chanter 110 of the North Carolina General Statutes 0110-128 et se and WHEREAS, it is the desire of the COUNTY to enter into i an agreement of employment with the ATTORNEYS for the performas~..' of such services that shall be required by the COU:~TX from tim''' to time for the Child Sup ort and Enforcement Program; and WHEREAS, the ATTORNEYS have agreed to represent the COUNTY as is hereinafter provided far a term extendinG from and after the date of this agreement to and including Juna 30, 197..~I NOW. THEREFORE, fox and in consideration of the mutual] terms and agreements hereinafter set forth, the COUNTY and the i ATTORNEYS do contract, each with the other, as follows: ~ 1, The ATTORNEY shall perform such services and render: such advice to the COUNTY on such occasions as shall be require.. to properly and adequately represent the COUNTY in its adminis-• j I tration of the Child Support and Enforcement Program. 2. The ATTORNEYS shall be compensated for all servie_::~ rendered in connection with paragraph No. 1 above based an an hourly rate for services rendered of Forty and no/100 dollars ($40.00) per hour, such hours and amounts to be furnished to -~ ~:~ t• it the County Finance Officer for payment. 3. The ATTORNEYS shall keen an itemized record of work performed fox the COUNTY in connection with the Child Supr:. and Enforcement Program on a case by case basis and shall subm its bill therefor showing a breaY.dotan of those services ^erfor;.' on a case by case basis. 4. The ATTORNEYS may, from time to time, be awarder attorney's fees by the Court for representation of the COUNTY j I . in the Child Support and Enforcement Program. In the event thr-~ Court makes such an award the ATTORNEYS shall account to the C'-:" i i for all such attorney's fees received as a result of a Court is order. Such accounting shall be on a case by case basis_ 5. Recognizing that from time to time renresentat._::! I of the COUNTY by the ATTORNEYS may result in a conflict of inc.::,:..-:~~: for the ATTORNEYS, it is agreed that when such a conflict arise• . the ATTORNEYS may refex cases requiring legal services to other I lawyers in Orange County. Such referrals shall be with th ~ e cor and approval of the COUNTY Manager. In all cases of referrz:'... the attorney to which the case is referred shall be comnensat~an in the same manner as s!~ecified in naragzaph 2 above, and shall ! i keep an itemized record of woxk performed for the COi?NTY on a ! case by case basis, submitting a bill therefor showing a bre~!'.--I down of s'ervices' performed on a case by case basis as speci- fied in paragraph 3. In the event such an attorney is atrazded 'I i counsel fees from the COUNTX in this regard, an accounting sha~.'_ be made to the•COUNTY in the same manner as provided for in par..- graph 4 above. e 6. This agreement shall exist and continue from the 1 1 date hereof to June 30, 1978, at which time the parties shall b? , free to renegotiate this agreement and modify the same as the existing conditions may dictate. t 'N!P!STON, COLEMAN 1 ANp BERNHOLZ ATTORNEYS AT LAW CHAPEL HILL, N. C. NILLSBOgpUGH, N, C. ! 1 may.:. r., f.' I IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the COUNTY and the ATTORNEYS have hereunto signed this agreement in duplicate originals, one of i i which is retained by each party hereto and either of which is 1 • I sufficient as the original. ; ORANGE COUNTX, NORTH CAROLINA a By •~ ~ ~ d Ric~E. 64hitted, Chai m::.°.., Orange Caunty ~ommlSSloI"tE? :' ii ,r1 ~ Agatha R. J'ohnson,~ lerk of the goa,rd~ of Cammissia~ers, Orange ~.. ~ . ~'~ Caunty.. ` = . ~~' - ;. _ `r ; (cbzpor~.t,e. seal affixeda ;,;,•-. .. _. - 'tip' ~: B ~YIN570N, COLEMAN II AND BERNHOLZ ATTOFSN eYS A7 LAW CHAPEL MALL, N, C. H~LLSBOROUGN, N. C. NORTH CAROLINA ORANGE COUNTY Alonzo t3racvn uo C:eneral Partner f ' .ti ~ i / ~' f ~' ~a B~~ixaz? //; i C-~ lema~ , .7r - ~' ~, I . ~ - ~ ~ a Natazy Public o~ ' said State and Caunty, do hereby certify that ALCNZO BRO~ti:~I ~ personally appeared before me this day and ackno*.v- COLEP1IAN, ,7r - , ledged'the due execution of the foregoing instrument. WI'I'NE55 my hand and Notarial. Seal, this~~day of , 1977. t -t - _ -•~~ ~, h ,1~ t.7y commission expires: '/ iV{7T~RY ~ ~~ I 11 %r ei; ~ , ~~ PU5LIC ~~•,' 7- \~ \'''c ou~~~- , NORTH CAROLINA ~--` ORANGE COUNTX ,A ~ , a rota-•::' I, Public for said Coufi~~y a~}~} Sta~e, certzfy that AGATHA R. ~OHNSO-::~ personally came beforethis day and acknowledged that she is ! the Clerk to the Board of County Commissioners of Orange CountX.l I j . ~ y, ~, :~ s and that by authority duly given and as the act of the said Boy..;.' of County Commissioners, the foregoing instrument was signed i_~ its name by its Chairman, sealed with its corporate seal, and ' attested by the said Agatha R. Johnson as its Clerk. i CdI~I1'NE~S my hand and Official 5ea1, this the ~~~~~ day c-_ No.~arv~Pt tic ~r- ; -- ,My~ ommission expires: ~-' '~~ ~ ~ i NORTH CAROLINA ORANGE COUNTY I, Agatha R. Johnson, Clerk of the Board of Commissioner_~ for the County of Prange, north Carolina, do hereby certify tha:-- the foregoing is a true copy of so much of the T~roceedings of t Board of Commissioners for said County at a meet.ina_ held ~.:_~. ~~~~~,, ~~ f ~ ~ ~ -- , as relates to the rc,; ;: ;:-• go~ g C ntract between Orange County and 64inston, Coleman an.` Belnhol~. 6Jitness my hand a d Official Seal of the County of Crangf~ this the~day of _,{,~~~ _ 1~~~ • - Agat_ a R. Johnson, ter}: of th:~ "' ~. Board'of Commissio ers for Orar •Y'•` County, North Carolina -- . ' :-) t _.a _: i ~~ :....-.-.~ .',,rr ,, ~ ~• 4 WINSTON, COLEMAN II AND BERNHOLZ AYTOFNEYS AT LAW CHAPEL H16L. N, C. HII~L590A000H, N. C. ~; w ._ STkTE OF I.OItTH C~IROLII~A C:OC}NTY Or ORA*_~GF_ A G R E E Ii E T1 1 THIS AGEFE'_~fEI~TT, made and entered into this the 1<<th day of June, 1977 by and b~tNeen the COUNTY OF 0°.F TVsE, Party of the First Part, hereinafter referred to as ''County", and the CHAPEL HILL HOi.ISING AUi'Hp:~ITY, Party of the Second Part, hereinafter referred to as "Authority"; jJ I T H E S S E T H - THAT WHEREAS, the Parties hereto did enter into a contract and agreeraen.t with respect to the fiscal year ending June 30, 1977 for the administration by the Authority in behalf of the County of the Section $ Rental Subsidy Program throughout Orange County, and CdHrP,EAS, the Parties heretp'desire to extend said Agreement fog- the fiscal year July 1, 1977 through June 30, 1978 under the sane terns and conditions- TdOCd, T}~P.P~EFORE, in consideration of she aforesaid and the I?utt''.1 covenants and conditions as setforth in said Agreement above referr~_=; to the Parties hereto do agree that the contract and agreement for the administration of the Section 8 Rental Subsidy Program by the Chapel Hill Housing Authority for and in behalf of the County of Orange sha11 be extended far the fiscal year 1977-1973 under the s?-..: terms and conditions as setfo-rth in the originc:l agreer::ant. I~ ,t P~~e 2 IN WTTidESS WHEREOF, the Parties have hereunto caused this instrument to be executed in their respective names by their appropriate officials, all by authority duly given. COUP3TY OF ORAr~GE ` Chaizilan, Oranbe County 'Soar Ca;anissioners ATTEST_ ~. C1er ;~' THE CHAPEL BILL HOUSING AUTHORITX" ~~ ~. ~ . 1 By ~~ , ~ ..1,~r+ + ~ +' hair-man -- - • • , AT"E5T_ V xecutive Director :,; ,~t~ ti~'; % i, ~ r~/• ' •, ~ ~ ~ :1 ~ + . ,~ ~, ~i, ~tl~~l~{lttltl ~,` ~ .. t