HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes - 19770629;~82
MINUTES
ORANGE COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
JUNE 29, 1977
The Orange County Board of Commissioners met jointly. with the Orange
County Planning Hoard on Wednesday, June 29, 1977, at 7:30 p.m., in the
Superior Courtroom for the purpose of having a work session to review
the work schedule of the Planning staff to redefine objectives and to re-
schedule priorities.
Commissioners present were Chairman Richard Whitted, rlorman
Gustaveson, Jan Pinney, Norman Walker and Donald Willhoit.
Planning Board members present were Chairman Dr ., Robert Bonar, John
5carlett, Hazel Lunsfordti Marilyn Riddle, Jean Anderson, Andrew Dobelstein,
Hilliard Caldwell, Pat Crawford, Paul Gates, Col. William Breeze and
Zindsey Efland.
Staff members present were S. M. Gattis, County Manager, and Agatha
Johnson Clerk. Jeffrey Gledhill, County Attorney was also present.
Chairman Whitted opened the meeting and stated that it is necessarv
that the two Boards look again at the work schedule of the Planning Depart-
. ment, in view of the fact that the Planning Board had recommended that the
Subdivision Regulations not be extended county-wide at this time, but to
be delayed until the various township Advisory Councils are formed and had
an opportunity to provide input. The Planning Board recommended that the
Subdivision amendments be implemented in Eno and Chapel Hill Townships
immediately. The Chairman stated that this recommendation would change
the planned work schedule for the coming year for the Planning Department.
Irwin Dobson, Planning Director, reviewed for the two Boards the pro-
press and prognosis report of the Planning Department dated February 15,
1977.
Chairman Whitted asked if there was any discussion regarding the
work plan the Planning Director had just presented.
Dr. Bonar pointed out that the reaseon the educational program of
the Planning Board had moved so slowly is that the Planning Board is
tied up with plat review and until the Subdivision Ordinance is amended
to make the administration of the plat review process more efficient there
would not be time fvr anything else. He added that people in the various
townships were concerned with the entire package of palnning and it would
be desirable to communicate with the communities at large.
Commissioner Willhoit stated that he had problems understanding how
the Advisory Councils would deal with the Subdivision Regulations since
the regulations is 'to be a county-wide instrument and whereby 'the Zoning
Ordinance can be tailored far specific purposes in unique situations.
He added that he felt it was the purpose of the Planning Board to look at
the Subdivision Regulations county-wide and the Ordinance which established
the Advisory Councils stated that their function is to deal with local
matters.
Dr. Bonar stated that the Advisory Councils would provide the Plan
ning Board with a broader view of various interests instead of special
interests.
Commissioner Willhoit asked the Planning Board of their rational
for the recommendation that was made to the County Commissioners.
Dr. Honar stated that from the reaction the Board had received from
citizens, it appeared that citizens were concerned with the Ordinance and
did not understand what the Ordinance would or would not do to them. He
added that he felt the Board should attempt to understand the concerns of
citizens and to have an exchange of views. The Advisory Councils are
mechanisms tQ accomplish this.
Pat Crawford stated that she felt it was important that citizens
understand the Ordinance and to know that the County will benefit from
such an Ordinance.
Andrew Dobelstein stated that the recommendation which was made by
the Planning Board had two 'problems which bothered him. 1) The substance
of the Subdivision Regulations and 2) concerning the process of the
Regulations. He stated that he felt the Planning Board and the County
Commissioners had reviewed the document thoroughly and changes had been
made to the Ordinance. The second concern was with loading the Advisory
Councils with the additional responsibility of the Subdivision Ordinance.
He added that he had voted against the Planning Board's recommendation.
Commissioner Willhoit asked if the delay recommended by the Planning
Board was a planning problem that needed to be worked out, or a political
problem.
Lindsey Efland responded by stating that the Planning Board had not
had sufficient time to research the document, and the intent of the motion
of the Planning Board was to provide time to look at the document. He
added that perhaps with more citizens input, citizens can see some of the
probelms the Planning Board and the County Commissioners are facing in
Planning for the County.
Commissioner Willhoit reminded the two Boards that a 90 day delay
had been granted in March, and the Land Owners Association had presented
13 recommendations to the Ordinance. He asked what is the problem with
the Ordinance, and what needs to be done to it?
Discussion ensued concerning the need for additional citizen input
regarding the proposed Ordinance.
Andrew Dobelstein stated that he felt the Planning Board should get
down to the real work of planning, that the Planning Board should not be
involved in a political issue such as the Subdivision Ordinance, but this
should be the responsibility of the County Commissioners,
Lindsey Efland stated that by having the Subdivision Regulations
in effect in Eno and Chapel Hill Townships this will provide a "trial run"
and will provide insight as to the effect of the Ordinance county-wide. "-
Chairman Whitted asked the two Bcards to look again at the work
program of the Planning Department and to plug the recommendation of the
Planning Board into that document to provide the•Planning Staff with
clear directions.
Col. Breeze stated that he felt the Subdivision Ordinance was a good
document, however, the County was facing several critical issues ~t this
time and he felt a master plan was needed in the County for land use. He
stated that the Ordinance had stirred interest and that the County should
not proceed too fast. He added that he would like to know answers to two
questions: 1) "Can we come up with a master plan for the Ceunty in land
use" and 2) "How is the Subdivision Ordinance going to help the County?"
Commissioner Willhoit responded by citing various problems in the
County which had resulted from poor planning. He spoke of the sewage
liminatians in Chapel Hill, the lack of control to protect the quality
of water in the University Watershed, and to protect other watersheds.
He stated that growth pressures along Highway 54 needed to be controlled.
Mr. Willhoit stated that the population of Orange County had increased _
19 percent since 1970. The Subdivision Ordinance would be a useful tool
for the Planning Board as they looked at various subdivisions and how.the
land is used.
Marilyn Riddle stated that she felt the Planning Board should get on
with the job of land use planning that will meet the problems dealing with
water, services, and the providing of services for a growing population.
She added the Subdivision Regulations are a part of that process and the
first step. The time is right to develop a Land use Plan.
Other members of the Planning Board expressed their reasons for
making the recommendation that was submitted to the County Commissioners
concerning the Subdivision Ordinance.
J ~~
Commissioner Gustaveson stated that the list of priorities and the
work plan was developed over a period of time and was coordinated with
what was possible in terms of staff time, He stated to go with seven
Advisory Councils at this time would radically reorder the priorities of
the Board for growth management for Bingham, Cheeks, and Hillsborough Town-
ships. He questioned using the Planning Staff to develop Advisory Councils
in seven townships. He asked for further discussion of what the priorities
should be for the Planning Staff for the next six months.
Ms. Riddle stated that perhaps it would be better in terms of overall
objectives to take the townships in two sections and conscentrate on land
use plan efforts in the crucial townships of Chapel Hill, Bingham, Eno,
Cheeks, and Hillsborough. She suggested that the Board proceed with the
establishing of Advisory Councils and to ask the Councils to begin work
on a land use plan and to draft a zoning Ordinance to be presented at a
public hearing on a specified date. She asked that the two Boards con-
sider this proposal and to set target dates for the establishing of the
Advisory Councils, the developing of the Land Use Plan, and the proposed
Ordinance.
Further discussion ensued as to whether or not five Advisory Councils
should be established or seven councils.
Chairman Whitted asked what time frame would be needed to get all
the Advisory Councils in place?
Dr. Bonar stated that it,would take between 3 or 4 months to set up
the Councils, however, the process could be speeded up to 90 days.
The Planning Director stated that it would take 2 weeks to properly
advertise the establishing of the Advisory Councils.
Commissioner Gustaveson stated that he could foresee the County
continuing for another 18 months without proper tools for planning in
some very critical areas., He suggested that the Board develop other
mechanisms throughout the County to provide discussion regarding the
Subdivision Ordinance and to continue on with the present work plan for
the Advisory Councils. He suggested further that the Board set an out- - '
side date for enactment of the Subdivisicn Ordinance.
Commissioner Walker stated that his idea was to develop a local
leval grass roots plan and to receive input from the Advisory Boards
and public meetings, He added that this was his idea of a workable land
use plan, where all people shared in the planning. He added that he was
not in favor of a master plan.
Hazel Lunsford stated that a function of the Advisory Board could be
to organize public meetings and that could be a useful tool to educate
citizens.
Lindsey Efland stated that he would be against N[s. Riddle's proposal.
He stated that the Board should work on an entire County Ordinance. He
added that he felt the Advisory Councils should be set up and trained re-
garding the Subdivision Ordinance and by the end of the year would be a
reasonable time to set up the Councils, to be functioning properly.
The zoning map and the land use plan, P4r. Efland stated, is entirely
different, and citizens of the County should be involved in the zoning map
and the land use plan.
Chairman Whitted stated that the Planning Staff needed some direc-
tion of a work plan for the next several months.
In further discussion regarding the Advisory Councils, Dr. Bonar
stated that he felt a minimum of 3 months and not longer than 6 months
would be a fair estimate for establishing the Advisory Councils. He -
suggested that the Boards aim for 3 months.
Commissioner Gustaveson spoke again of his concern of the lack of a
review process for the critical areas in the County. He stated that he
felt the Subdivision Regulations should be separate from the Advisory
Councils and the priorities set out in land use planning, Mr. Gustaveson
stated that he would not be in favor of any mechanism that would delay the
Subdivision Ordiance for mare than 90 days.
~.+ V 4'
Ms. Riddle suggested that the Advisory Councils spend 6 months, from
January to June, 1978, or from January til September, 1978, studymng the
maps and overlays which the Planning Department already has. Going
through an educational process in terms of what land use planning really
is and gathering input from local citizens. Hopefully, by the second
half of 1978, the Councils would be ready to look at a total land use plan.
Mr. Efland suggested that the Technical Advisory Committee and the
Advisory Councils in the local townships work closely together in develap-
ing a land use plan.
Ms. Riddle stated that the Advisory Councils would have use'of maps
and overlays which are now in the Planning Department. They will have
input from the'task force and be ready to come together with a draft land
classificatien plan by September, 1978.
Chairman Whitted stated that by September of 1978, the two Boards
would have hammered out a draft of a land classification plan and be
ready to go before a public hearing. From July til December, 1977, the
Advisory Councils would be getting into place.
The Subdivision Regulations are now in the hands of the Commissioners
Chairman Whitted asked that the Planning Staff review their daily
schedule and manpower and to relate this inform~.tion back to the Board.
The two Boards will then schedule another meeting.
Chairman Whitted requested that the Planning Board consider at
some future paint the extraterritorial jurisdiction request of the
Town of Chapel Hill. The Planning Staff will provide the Planning Board
with the.maps and resource materials.
Ben Lloyd spoke against the action of the two Boards. He questioned
the parliamentary procudures of a previous meeting of the Planning Board.
This matter was referred to the County Attorney fox research.
Other citizens spoke against the pzoposed Subdivision Ordinance.
The Chairman asked if anyone else wished to speak and no one came
forth.
The meeting was adjourned.
ichard E. Wh t e , airman
Agatha Johnson, Clerk
ORANGE COUNTY BOT~RD OF COMMISSxgNERS
JULY 5, 1977
The Orange County Board of Gammissianers met in, regular session on
Tuesday, July 5, 1977, at 10:00 a. m „ in the Commissioners' Room of the
Courthouse in Hillsborough, N. C.
Present were Chairman Richard Whitted, Commissioners Norman Gustaveson,
Jan Pinney, Norman Walker, and Donald Willhoit.
Staff members present were County Administrator, S. M. Gattis, Finance
Director, Neal Evans, and Agatha Johnson, Clerk to th.e Board,
Jeffrey Gledhill, County Attorney was also present.
Chairman Whitted opened the meeting by referring to Ttem 1 on the
agenda: Persons not on this agenda having business to transact with the
Board of Commissioners should make their presence known at this time.
James J. Freeland stated that he was present, along with other citizens
to ask questions regarding the new tax rate.
The consensus of the Board was to hear from the gathered group at this
time .