Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes - 19761221~2 7. Implementation of the Orange County Comprehensive Planning Council. Commissioner Gustaveson stated that this priority would not involve very much staff time at first. This is a very important prior- ity of the Board and will be on the agenda for the Decembez 21st meeting for adoption. S. Focus Planning efforts on land use planning. The Board agreed that this item had been engrained in the entire discussion. 9. To identify environmental Critical Areas - This will be a part of the mapping of the existing usage to be incorporated into the overall process of the land use development plan. 10. Housing opportunities is a long range goal which the Board will talk about at another time. Commissioner Pinney stated that he would not like to see the Planning Department get involved in the Community Development project again, unless it would be of some assistance to other municipalities. Chairman Whitted stated that another concern was I-40 and that the Board and the Planning Staff should be ready to assist in any way when the Department of Transportation issues it Environmental Impact Statement. The Planning Staff was requested to take the list of priorities as discussed and to work on a time schedule to be presented to the Board at another time. A list of names of persons interested in serving on the Planning Board and on the Advisory Planning Council is to be ready for the December 21st meeting. A legal clarification of terms concern- ing the Ordinance of 1965, which established the Planning Board, should be ready for the December 21st meeting. Chairman Whitted spoke of the future meeting with the officials from Chapel Hill, Carrbaro, Hillsborough, and members of the legislation from the area. The County Manager was asked to investigate the possi- bility of such a meeting. Upon motion of Commissiener Pinney, the rmeeting-/-a~ adjourned. I~~~..N~J'~ ~~" `~~i ,yL ~d tRichard E. Whitted, Chairman Agatha Johnson, Clerk ORANGE COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS DECEMBER 21, 1977 ~o The Orange County Board of Commissioners met in regular session on Tuesday, December 21, 1976, at 7:30 p.m., in the Commiss3.oners' Room of the Courthouse in Hillsborough, N. C. Commissioners present were Chairman Richard Whitted, Norman Gustaveson, Jan Pinney, .Norman Walker, and Donald Willhoit. Others present were S. M. Gattis, County Manager, Neal Evans, Finance Director, Steve Bernholz and Jeffery Gledhill, County Attozneys, and Agatha Johnson, Clerk. Chairman Whitted referred to Item 1 on the Agenda: Persons not on this agenda having business to transact with the Board of Commissioners should make their presence known. No one came forth. Mr. Whiffed referred to Item 2: Minutes of Commissioners' meetings of December 6th and 14th to be considered for approval. The minutes of December 6, 1976, were reviewed and corrections were pointed out. Upon motion of Commissioner Pinney, seconded by Commissioners Gustaveson, it was moved and adopted that the minutes of December 6, 1976 be approved. The minutes of December 14, 1976, were reviewed and corrections ~~ were pointed out. Upon motion of Commissioner Pinney, seconded by Commissioner Gustaveson, it was moved and adopted that the minutes of December 14, 1976, be approved. The Chairman referred to Item 3: A request to appropriate $6,000 from the current District Health Department's budget will be presented by Susan Spault. Mr. Spault, Coordinator of Health Services in the Chapel Hill- Carrboro Scheols, along with Dr. RobeYt Hanes and Dr. Corodon Fuller will explain.a request to appropriate $6,000 from the current District Health Department's budget to provide an additional full time nurse to serve in the Chapel Hill-Carrboro School System. Mr. Spault spoke of the need for an additional school nurse and the potential of a nurse working with the schools and the Health Depart- . ment. She stated that an additional nurse would allow expanded nursing within the elementary schools as outlined in the job description and alse allow the inclusion within the secondary schools of nursing service care. With another nurse, Mr. Spault would be free to coordinate health servics in the elementary and secondary schools. Dr. Fuller, District Health Director, stated that the need for another nurse was because of an overload crested by the swine flu program and because of the manifestation of head lice throughout the school system. Dr. Hanes, Superindendent of the Chapel Hi11-Carrboro School System, informed the Board of a Health Task Force working in the Chapel Hill- .. Carrboro School area. One area the task force has concentrated upon is to identify on-going services which a professional nurse would provide. The need for a health nurse coordinated through the Health Department has become more prevalent. Chairman Whitted stated that Dr. Fuller had indicated to the Board of Commissioners that the $6,000 request would be appropriated by the District Health Department from their curxent budget instead of a supple- mental request. Dr. Fuller stated that this was correct, however, there would be a need to continue the program at the end of the fiscal year. Commissioner Gustaveson questioned Dr. Fuller of the vacancies which existed in the Health Department. Dr. Fuller stated that he f~1t a business manager was needed instead of a health administrator. Mr. Gustaveson asked Dr. Fuller of his rationale for changing from a health administrator to a business manager. Commissioner Gustaveson stated that a health administrator was a high priority when Dr. Fuller met with the Commissioners and the Health Task Force last October, 1975, and again in June, 1976, at the Commissioners' budget meeting. He stated that it was felt the position would take some responsibility off of Dr. Fuller to free him to work in the clinic as presented in the School of Public Health's proposal. Dr. Fuller stated that the thought of a business manager had just occurred and that he felt with the funding, and the ramifications of handling funds for the five counties, he had decided to expl6re this area. He added that there was room for both a business manager and a health administrator in the District Health Department. He stated that he felt a health administrator should function between the Health Department and the School of Public Health. Commissioner Gustaveson stated that he was concerned about the sur- plus within the Health Department and that he was deeply disturbed by the slowness of the Health Department in moving on the high priorities cited in October of 1975. Commissioner Gustaveson requested that an in-depth discussion of this question be included on the agenda far the first Tuesday in January and that a serious study be made of the feasi- bility of Orange County developing its own Public Health Program. 24 Commissioner Willhoit requested that the Commissioners be informed of the time of the subcommittee's meeting to consider hiring an.~admini- strator for the District Health Department. Commissioner Gustaveson moved for the enthusiastic support of the request to appropriate $6,000 from the District Health Department's budget for an additional school nurse, and that provisions be made in the forthcoming budget for this position. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Willhoit. The Chairman called for the vote on the motion and all members of the Board voted aye. The motion was declared passed. Chairman Whitted referred to Item 4: Ms. Marilyn Tyroler will request the Board of Commissioners provide $1,500 to fund the CRIB Pro- gram for the October-December quarter. Ms. Frances Muth, of the CRIB staff, stated that CRIB is a corpor- ated home for mother and their babies who have no other place to live. She stated that CRIB had been funded since May of 1974 with 314-D funds and United Fund. The 314-D funds are no longer available. Ms. Muth requested $1,500 from the County to continue the CRIB program through the months of December and January of 1977. She added that CRIB would seek other sources of funding for the month of February and the remainder of the year. Discussion ensued concerning the budget of the CRIB Program. Ms. Tyroler of the Social Services Department, spoke of the value of the CRIB Program. She stated that the program was a very inexpensive program which used the coordinated services of the community. She added that at the end of January, $3,500 would be available through United Fund. Upon motion of Commissioner Pinney, seconded by Commissioner Willhoit, it was moved and adopted to appropriate $1,500 from the Contingency Fund to the CRIB Program. The Finance Director was requested to provide the Board with a proper budget amendment. (For copy of Budget Amendment see page 31 of this book.) Mr. Gustaveson asked that the CRIB accountant clarify the budget and to state clearly just where the money appropriated by the County was going. It was pointed out that the CRIB Program was a public service and that no one was turned away. The recipients are encouraged to seek employment and to repay monies .used for their care. Chairman Whitted referred to Item 5: Appointments A. A first alternate should be named to the Orange County Board of Adjustment. Commissioner Willhoit asked why alternates were needed, why not expand the Board to ten members. The County Manager stated that if the Board was expanded, it would increase the quorum and the difficult was attendance of members. Commissioner Gustaveson suggested that this appointment be deferred until the next meeting at which tuns the Board wotild look at the list of persons applying for the Advisory Planning Council. He added that perhaps one of these persons would be interested in serving on this Board as an alternate. B. A consumer representative should be named to the Durham-Orange Employment Training Service Advisory Council. Chairman Whitted stated that he had attended the December meeting o£ the DOETS and that the actual membership from Orange County was unclear. He asked that a list be provided to him with names of the Orange County members. C. A person or persons should be named to fill vacancies on the County EMS Counsil and the Orange Water and Sewer Authority created by the resignation o£ Flora Garrett. 25 Mr. Whitted stated that after talking with Mrs. Garrett, she had indicated that she would like to be replaced on the EMS Council, but also indicated a willingness to continue serving on the Orange Water- Sewer Authority. Commissioner Willhoit moved that Commissioner Gustaveson be named as the County's appointee to the Emergency Medical Service Council to replace Mrs. Elora Garrett. Commissioner Pinney seconded the motion. The Chairman called for the vote. Voting aye were Commissioners Pinney, Whitted, Willhoit and Walker. Voting nay was Commissioner ___ Gustaveson. The motion was declared passed. -Commissioner Gustaveson moved that Mrs. Garrett continue serving on the Orange Water-Sewer Authority. Commissioner Willhoit seconded the motion. Chairman Whitted.„statQd that Mrs. Garrett had sent a letter of resignation as the County's appointee to•OWASA, and now she was formally withdrawing her letter. The Board agreed that the proper procedure would be for Commissioner Gustaveson to withdraw his motion and that Mrs. Garrett would continue serving on the OWASA Board. Mr. Gustaveson agreed to withdraw his motion. D. The County Council on the Status of Women has requested Ms. Anne Patton be named to this Council. Upon motion of Commissioner Pinney, seconded by Commissioner Willhoit, it was moved and adopted that Anne Patton be named to the Orange County Commission on the Status of Women. The Chairman stated that the County Attorney had requested an additional item be added to the agenda concerning the request of the County Attorney and the Chapel Hill Town Attorney to the Attorney General regarding extraterritorial jurisdiction. Mr. Bernholz presented to the Board copies of a letter from the Attorney General's Office. Following discussion, the Board agreed that the Attorney General's opinion was inconclusive. Mr. Bernholz stated that his opinion was un- changed and Mr. Denny's opinion which was in conflidt with Mr. Bernholz was unchanged. Commissioner Gustaveson stated that'.the issue was still present and that he felt the Board needed to talk wtih Chapel Hill to attempt to resolve the issue. Mr. Bernholz stated that Chapel Hill had the option of seeking local legislation which would cure, if passed, the defect. Commissioner Gustaveson suggested that the County attempt to work with Chapel Hill to try to solve some of the problems. He added that it was important that the County take the initiative and be involved with any local legislation to determine the extraterritorial jurisdiction. Cammissior!er Whitted stated that the Board would give the County Attorney further direction after talking with Chapel Hill. Chairman whitted referred to Item 6: Ms. Kathy Hoffer, representing the County Planning Department, will present four plats for consideration. Three of these plats are minor subdivisions while the other is a corrected _ plat.. The Chairman recognized Ms. Hoffer who presented to the Board a list of additional names of persons interested in serving on the Community Advisory Planning Councils. The first plat presented by Ms. Hoffer was that of James Albert. Mr. Albert is subdividing 1.7 acres out of a 9.08 acre tract in Eno Town- ship. The lot does have road frontage, and a health permit has been obtained. Upon motion of Commissioner Pinney, seconded by Commissioner Gustaveson, it was moved and adopted to approve the plat of James Albert, 2s Larry Melton Mr. Melton is cutting 5 acres from 28 acres in Eno Township. He has 400 feet of rcad frontage. Discussion ensued concerning the driveway entrance required. Upon motion of Commissioner Gustaveson, seconded by Commissioner Pinney, it was moved and•adopted that the plat of Larry Melton be approved. Linda and Roland Miller - The Millers are dividing 2 acres out of a 32 acre tract. There is sufficient road frontage and a health permit has been obtained. Upon motion of Commissioner Pinney, seconded by Commissioner Walker, - it was moved and adopted to approve the plat of Linda and Roland Miller. Strayhorn Hills - Mr. Jim Hopper, developer of Strayhorn Hills, stated that the original plat foz Strayhorn Hills was approved years ago, however, a revised plat was drawn up shortly thereafter which reflected changes in the road right of ways. The revised plat was never recorded due to an oversight. The revised plat needs to be approved in order to be recorded. Discussion ensued. It was pointed out that if any problem arose in the exchange of land, the burden would be with Mr. Hopper. Dalton Loftin, Attorney for Mr. Hopper, stated that all property owners would receive a new deed based on where the stakes are and as shown on the revised plat. Upon motion of Commissioner Walker, seconded by Commissioner Pinney, it was moved and adopted that the revised plat of Strayhorn Hills be approved. The next item for discussion was Item 7: Wes Hare, Acting Chairman of the Youth Services Needs Task Force, will present an interim report reviewing the activities of this task force. Mr. Hare stated that this report which was presented to the Commis- sioners would be sent to the State Department of Human Resources which reflects the current status of the Youth Services Needs Task Force. He added that the Task Force would appear before the Board again on January 18, 1977, to submit proposals for the program and work statements. Upon questioning of Commissioner Gustaveson, Mr. Hare stated that the status of funds would be through LEAA which were still available. Upon motion of Commissioner Gustaveson, seconded by Commissioner Willhoit, it was moved and adopted to accept and endorse the interim report as submitted by the Youth Services Needs Task Force. The Chairman was authorized to forwazd the report to the Department of Human Resources in Raleigh. Commissioner Gustaveson commended the Youth Services Needs Task Force for their time and effort in working on the Task Force. Item 14 and Item 15 were discussed simultaneously. Item 14 was con- cerning an updated estimate of the Title XX situation as prepared by the Finance Director. Item 15 was concerning action the Board of Commissioners might wish to take concerning the present agreement between the County and the.Frank Porter Graham Child Development Center. The agreement expires December 31, 1976. Chairman Whitted stated that last September when Title XX Funds were extended, the Board decided to review the contracts again in December.- Presently, the contracts have been taken care of through the end of the year by action of this Board or by other Boards, except for the Frank Porter Graham Contract. The County Manager stated that it was believed that another Title XX reallocation would be allotted by the first of January of 1977, and that the allocation would be approximately the same as the first alloca- tion. He added that he and the Finance Director recommended that Frank Porter Graham be funded for three months at the same level of expenditures. Discussion ensued concerning the SociAl Services Department's level of expenditures. Commissioner Gustaveson stated that he felt it was important to ~~ present a strong case to the State in terms of what is spent this year, and in order to assure the same level of allocation for the coming year. He stated that he would like to see the next quarter go full funded far all programs. Dr. Craig Ramey, of the Frank Porter Graham School, stated that the school had indicated the desire to serve fourteen additional infants this year, but had not done so because of the cutback of Title XX Funds. In October, the Board set a ceiling of spending for Frank Porter Graham at $8,000 per month. He added that the school had not spent this money and now feels they can include the fourteen additional children and not exceed the $8,000 ceiling by very little. He stated that Frank Porter Graham was requesting that the $$,000 ceiling be allowed to expire and that Frank Porter Graham go back to the oziginal aantract. Commissioner Pinney stated that he did not feel the County would get the same allocation next year as had been received this year, and that the County should proceed cautiously. Commissioner Willhoit stated that he would not like to see the service for the next six months cut because the Board was not sure of providing the service next year. Upon motion of Commissioner Pinney, seconded by Commissioner Walker, it was moved and adopted that the Frank Porter Graham Contract be re- viewed again in March based on the January, 1977 reallocation. Frank Porter Graham will go back to the original contract effective January, 1977 Ttem 8: The subcommittee reviewing the County Land Use Ordinance would like to hear comments from the Board of Commissioners concerning changes in our current plat review procedure. This item was deferred. The Planning Director will inform the County Manager when he is ready for this discussion. Chairman Whitted referred to Item 10: The County Attorney is pre- pared to respond to questions Board Members pr staff might submit con- cerning: (A). Bylaws of the County Planning Board and (B). Provisions of the County Planning Ordinance. Commissioner Gustaveson stated that the specific issue was the terms of office. The bylaws stated five years and the Planning Board had been operating under a three year term. This matter needs clarifi- cation. Commissioner Willhoit stated that he felt the Ordinance adapted in 1965, creating the Planning Board, should be amended to expand the membership to 12 members. He added that terms should be considered in the new appointments. Jeff Gledhill, County Attorney, stated that people who sit on Boards created by the Board of Commissioners sit at the pleasure of the Board. The Board is free to do what ever it wants to. The General Statutes state that the Commissioners can change, create and abolish County Government. A specific requirement for an amendment to the Ordinance concerning the Planning Board would require a public hearing. He added that it was his opinion that should the Ordinance be left as it is, there would be five year terms. Persons serving any portion of an unexpired five year term would continue serving until completing an unexpired portion of the term. Anyone presently on the Board whose last appointment occurred prior to five years, is serving at the plea- sure of the Board. Anyone serving in a vacancy capacity would serve until the unexpired term is completed. Commissioner Willhoit suggested that the Ordinance creating the Planning Board be amended and incorporated into the Zoning Ordinance and that the terms of office be spelled out. Discussion ensued. Commissioner Gustaveson suggested that the Planning Department take the 19fi5 Ordinance and delete some of the procedural items and develop a new 1977 Ordinance that would spell out 28 in broad terms the functions of the Planning Board and the power to pre- sent their own bylaws. Further discussion ensued. Chairman Whitted stated that he felt the section regarding terms should be revised and that this amendment should not state a limit of the number appointed to the Board. Commissoner Willhoit suggested further that the Planning Staff draft a section to go into the Zoning Ordinance spelling out the Organization of the Planning Board. The consensus of the Board was that the Planning Director and his staff work from the 1965 Ordinance and develop an acceptable ordinance which can be used as an ordinance for the functioning of the Planning Board and also serve as a possible insert as a section of the Zoning Ordinance. C. The request of P. A. Saitta for permission to hunt waterfowl at Lake Orange. Chairman Whitted stated that on the first Monday in December, 1976, the Board had requested the County Attorney to research the Restrictive Covenants of landowners of Lake Orange as set forth in the deed, as to whether they were in conflict with the law as would apply to the request of Mr. Saitta. The County Attorney stated that an answer was not available. He asked if the County was interested in pursuing this matter further. He added that should permission be granted to Mr. Siatta, litigation might be involved. Commissioner Walker stated that he felt the Board was asking for trouble and asked that the Board table the matter. Mr. Bobby Nichols, a landowner in the Lake Orange area, asked per- mission to speak. Mr. Nichols spoke of the origin of Lake O]:ange. He stated that the County owned the water and the dam site and the land under the water. The landowners had reserved very limited hunting rights and they did not want the public hunting on their property. He added that recreational rights were not for the County to give, because the County had never owned the rights. Mr. Dalton Loftin, Attorney for the landowners, stated that he felt it would be a show of bad faith on the part of the County to grant per- mission to Mr. Siatta. He added that the land was given to the County and that recreational rights were deeded to the Lake Orange Corporation which were reserved in the deed itself. He added that he felt if the County violated the spirit of the deed, it would affect the consideration for the deed itself. The County might find that it does not own Lake Orange. He continued by stating that a deed without consideration is void. Chairman Whitted stated that the County had no intention of doing any- thing that they had na authori.ty to do. He added that Mr. Saitta had asked permission to use the water and had permission from a land owner to use his land. Discussion ensued. Upon motion of Commissioner Willhoit, seconded by Commissioner Pinney, the Board agreed to table this request of Mr. Saitta. i Chairman Whitted referred to Ttem 11 and Item 12: The County Attorney has reviewed contracts with Joseph Nassif, AIA, for remodeling at Grady Brown School and at the County Jail and will deliver his legal opinion of these instruments. Jeffrey Gledhill, County Attorney, stated that he had reviewed the SIS Contracts with Mr. Nassif and that the Contracts were in proper legal foam. Commissioner Pinney stated that he had a number of questions arising from his study of the AIA Contracts. Commissioner Walker stated that he also had some questions. Mr. Walker moved that this matter be tabled for two weeks to provide adequate study and at the same time get other proposals from other architects. The motion died for lack of a second. z~ Commissioner Pinney proceeded to review some of the questions he had with the Contracts. Commissioner Walker stated that he had questions, which he read to the Board concerning the qualifications and background of a chosen consultant. Commissioner Gustaveson stated that the Board had spent aver 18 months in discussion of qualifications of the architect and he felt that a very thoa^ough review of the architect had been made. Further discussion ensued. The Chairman stated that the-Board had decided at their last meeting to engage Mr. Nassif as the architect for design of the Grady Brown School building pending the County Attorney's review of the Contracts. Commissioner Gustaveson suggested that Mr. Pinney and those with questions meet with Mre Nassif and the County Attorney to review the Contract. The Chairman requested Commissioner Pinney to arrange the meeting with the County Attorney and Mr. Nassif and that other Board members be informed of the time of the meeting. The chairman referred to Item 12: Wi11 the Board of Commissioners authorize the Chairman to execute a contract with Joseph Nassif, AIA, for architectural work necessary to renovate the Orange County Jail. Commissioner Gustaveson moved that the Chairman be authorized to sign the AIA Contract with Mr. Nassif for architectural work to renovate the Orange County Jail, after Mr. Pinney, the County Attorney, and Mr. Nassif have reviewed the documents. He added that should there be any questions concerning the contract that the document should be brought back to the Board. Commissioner Pinney seconded the motion. The Chairman called for the vote. Voting aye were Commissioners Gustaveson, Pinney, Whitted and Willhoit. Voting nay was Commissioner Walker. The Chairman declared the motion passed. Item 13: The Finance Director will review a proposed budget amend- ment. The County Manager recommends adoption of these amendments. The agenda attachment stated that the proposed budget amendment in- cludes the establishment of two new funds as well as numerous changes in the General Fund. The. two new funds account for the School Bond money and the Section Eight Program. Tn the General Fund, the nichol on the bottle money and the Sheriff's Special Account axe appropriated per the frequest request of Commissioners. The School Capital Outlay appropriation, replaced by Bond Funds, is moving to the General County Building Account. Three amounts, one for Courts-Equipment, one for Motor Pool Supplies, and one for Miscellaneous Community Development, were erroneously not appropriated and need to be added to the budget. One, the Community Aevelopment Project has a revenue source, not yet received; the Courts-Equipment for Courtroom Furniture was appropriated in the previous year, but not encumbered and consequently should come from unappropriated Fund Balance; and the Motor Pool-Supplies for auto stickers was never appropriated and it is suggested that this come from Contingency. One additional sum is required to balance the Miscellaneous-Street Surfacing Account. $2,367 is the total cost of the first project and it is recommended that this come from Street Assessment. Commissioner Gustaveson moved that the budget amendment be adopted. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Whitted. The Chairman called for the vote. Voting aye were Commissioners Gustaveson, Whitted, Willhoit and Walker. Voting nay was Commissioner Pinney. The motion was declared passed. For copy of 1976-1977 Budget Ordinance Amendment see page 32 of this book. i 30 Item 16: The Board, at its December 6th Session, deferred discussion of County participation in a county-wide comprehensive planning council until this session. Commissioner Gustaveson stated that at the first Monday's meeting he had recommended that the proposal be adopted in substance and requested that one member of this Board work with a member from the Chapel Hill and Carrboro Boards to begin implementing the report. Discussion ensued concerning the make up of the Board in order to pro- vide representation from all areas of the County. Upon motion of Commissioner Gustaveson, seconded by Commissioner _ Willhoit, it was moved and adopted that the Subcommittee on Planning Report be adopted as submitted by the Intergovernmental Planning Council. Commissioner Gustaveson stated further that one member of this Board should be appointed to serve as a liason between Ghapel Hill and Carrboro as the program is implemented. Mx. Gustaveson volunteered to serve in this capacity. Upon motion of Commissoner Willhoit, seconded by Commissioner Pinney, it was moved and adopted that Commissioner Gustaveson be appointed to serve in this capacity. Commissioner Gustaveson stated that he had an additional item for the Board to discuss. He referred to the Mental Health Center and the cost of improving the termo-efficiency standards for that building. He suggested that Mr. Webb, the architect for the Mental Health Center be asked to pro- vide an engineering study of some of the things that can be done to improve the thermo-efficiency of the bulding, and the additional cost involved. The County Manager was requested to contact Mr. Webb and report his discussion to the Board. Upon motion of Commissoner Pinney, the meeting was adjourned. Richard E. Whitted, Chairman Agatha Johnson, Clerk k ~. I ~, - 31 ORANGE COUNTY 1976-77 BUDGET ORDINANCE AMENDMENT The 1976-77 Budget Ordinance of Drange County as adopted on June 24, 7976, and subsequently amended, is hereby amended as fo1laws: Change the appropriation for the following line items in the funds indicated: INCREASE FUND - ITEM (DECREASE) ~ 70 TOTAL. General: Agency Support~CRIB 7,500. 1,500 Contingency (1,500) 142,471 Change the revenues and fund balances estimated to be available to meet the foregoing appropriations in the funds indicated: INCREASE FUND ~ RESOURCE (DECREASE ~ TO TOTAL Adopted this the 21st day of December, 1976 3z ORANGE COUNTY 1976-77 BUDGET ORDINANCE AMENDMENT The 1976-77 Budget Ordinance of Orange County as adopted an June 24, 1976, ` and subsequently amended, is hereby amended as follows: Section I:. A Capital Projects Fund is created for the purpose of accounting ~`~~::~ ,..,.: Resources and Expenditures of School Bond Funds with the following initial appropriations and. estimates of revenues: Chapel Hill Projects 3,000,000 Orange County Projects 3,000,000 REVENUES Sale of Bonds 6,000,000 Section II: A Trust and Agency Fund is established for the purpose of accounting for the Resources and Expenditures of the Orange County Housing Authority with the following initial appropriations and estimates of revenues: •• Contractual Services 125,000 REVENUES Federal Grants- Section 8 125,000 Section III: The following line items of appropriations in the General Fund are changed as indicated: INCREASE • • ITEM (DECREASE TO TOTAE Buildings & Rents- Mental Health 15,000 60,000 Buildings & Rents- Building Fund 404,413 914,413 Courts- Equipment 4,050 5,050 Health- Alcoholic Rehabilitation 40,000 40,000 Misc.- Community Development 30,000 30,000 Misc.- Street Surfacing 2,367 32,367 Motor Pool- Supplies 480 680 Schools- Chapel Hill Capital Outlay (404,413) ~ 391,000 Sheriff- Other Expense 1,700 1,900 Contingency (480) 143,491 ;. Section IV: The following estimates of revenues in the General Fund are changed as .follows: INCREASE ITEM (DECREASE TO TOTAL ABC- Al coholic Rehabilitation 55,000 55,Op0 Federal Grants- Community Development 30,000 30,OOD Misc.- Court Funds 1,7D0 1,700 Special Assessments 2,367 2,367 Section V: To balance the revenues and expenditures an additional amount of $4,050 is appropriated of the General Fund Balance. Adopted this the 21st day of . __pecember~ 976 1 . , 33