HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes - 19761101Mr. Morris stated "z think we can move relative fast to a place
where we can have an agreement on principles involved. The basic con-
cepts I think. In other words, whether we jointly say let's go ahead
full steam working out these things which we need to decide on."
Mr. Howes added "I say this not to be antagonistic. 2 think this
is a very serious issue for the voters of the County. I will stand
by what I said in the beginning. I will also say that I have to con-
sider my first obligation to the Authority, and that obligation is to
provide a water supply to the people of this area, and everything that
is done, in terms of preparing this agreement will have to be done to
protect that basic responsibility add, therefore, I would say that I
think that as we proceed with development of these joint...., if that
objective is not utmost, and if it is abrogated, in anyway, then 2 would -
have to vote against it. 2 say this not to be antagonistic or sugges-
tive that 2 don't think we can make it. 2 do think we can make it,
but questions have been raised tonight that to same extent can't be
answered toniaht and won't be answered until we see what an agreement
looks like on paper."
Shirley Marshall stated "2 thing that's very true, John, but I
think very good positive things might happen if we begin to have at
least a small committee composed of some members of the Orange Water
and Sewer Authority, the County Commissioners and some of the residents
to look at the human side of what we are doing. There is no doubt that
there are County resources that can help with some of these problems
that we simple can't have and never will have."
Mr. Howes "2 don't disagree with that at all. r think we can
take these steps forward and proceed with the joint planning of this,
but I don't think we are in a position, on either side, if we are near,
to enter into final prepared type agreements."
Chairman Garrett stated "2 don't think we are either, but 1 think
we can begin. If we are sure that the Authority has to move, as I know
we must, that the other resources and the way that things are. P.1ans
need to be made together."
Chairman Morris stated that the Authority would have a brief
meeting and that the Authority would be in touch with the Commissioners
and Mr. Johnson and his colleagues` also. He stated further that he had
found the meeting very positive and meaningful.
The meeting was then adjourned.
~`~-~
Flora R. Garrett, Chairman
Betty June Hayes, Clerk
ORANGE COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
MONDAY , NOVEP~IBER 1, 19 7 6
The Orange County Board of Commissioners meet in regular session on
Monday, November 1, 1976, at 10:00 a.m., in the Commissioners' room of
the Courthouse in Hillsborough.
Members present were Chairman Flora Garrett, Commissioners Norman -
Gustaveson, Jan Pinney, Richard Whitted and Norman CvalkeX.
Members absent were none.
Others present were 5. M. Gattis, County Administrator, Neal
Evans, Finance Director, A. B. Coleman, Jr., County Attorney and Betty
June Hayes, Clerk to the Board.
The Chairman referred to Item 1 on the Agenda: Persons not on
this agenda having business to transact with the Board of Commissioners
should make their presence known at this time.
Chairman Garrett recognized Mrs. Josephine Barbour.
Mrs. Barbour read statement made by Mrs. Mygard of the Sierra Club.
Referring to a film strip which shown trees falling into the Eno River.
Mrs. Nygard had stated that timbering of this nature would no longer
be permitted along the Eno River and that a buffer strip had been insti-
tuted, due to the efforts of the Sierra Club.
Mrs. Barbour's question was, if a buffer strip had been set aside,
how many of the landowners have been informed of tkiis so that timber-
. ing operations will comply with the regulations of the thoughts of the
Sierra Club.
Mrs. Barbour was informed that the Commissioners had not establ-
fished any buffer zone and that she should talk with the Forest Service
concerning the matter.
The Chairman referred to Item 2: Minutes of Commissioners' meeting
on October 19, 1976.
The minutes of October 19, 1976, were reviewed and discussion.en-
sued. The Clerk was requested to verify from the tape one section of
the minutes concerning the Technical Committee to review the Zoning
Amendments.
Upon motion of Commissioner Whitted, seconded by Commissioner
Pinney, it was moved and adopted that the minutes of October 19, 1976,
be approved.
Mrs. Garrett referred to Item 3: Appointments
A. Two' persons should be named as Trustees for the Firemen's
Relief Fund of the Orange Grove Volunteer Fire Department. The Orange
Grove Volunteer Fire Department has recommended Dr. Nancy M. Johnson
and Mr. Fletcher Holmes.
Upon motion of Commissioner Gustaveson, seconded by Commissioner
Whitted, it was moved and adopted that Dr. Nancy Johnson and Fletcher
Holmes be named as trustees for the Firemen's Relief Fund of the
Orange Grove Volunteer Fire Department.
B. The term of Ms. Sonna Loewenthal on the Chapel Hi11 Board of
Adjustment expired June 30, 1976, The Board of Adjustment has recom-
mended Ms. Loewenthal be reappointed.
Upon motion of Commissioner Whitted, seconded by Commissioner
Gustaveson,. it was moved and adopted that Ms. Sonna Loewenthal be
reappointed as a member of the Chapel Hill Board of Adjustment.
C. The term of Mr. Marion Alexander on the Chapel Hill Board of
Adjustment expired June 30, 1976. Mr. Alexander does not desire
reappointment.
The item was far information only. The Board took no action.
D. The Carrboro Board of Aldermen recommends Mr. Art Cleary be
named to replace Ms. Margaret Stumpf on the Carrboro Planning Board.
Ms. Stumpf's term expires in September, 1978.
Discussion ensued. The Chairman informed the Board that Mx.
Cleary did not live within the County planning district.
Commissioner Pinney nominated Emmett Pendergraph to fill this
vacancy. Commissioner Whitted seconded the nomination.
All members of the Board voted aye and the motion was declared
passed.
E. Mr. Donald Willhoit has resigned from the Carrboro Planning
Board. His term expires in September, 1981. The Carrboro Broad of
Aldermen has recommended Mr. Roger Pratt be named to replace Mr.
Willhoit.
The Chairman informed the Board that Mr. Pratt, also did not
live within the County Planning district.
Action concerning this appointment was deferred.
F. The term of Faye Suggs on the Carrboro Board of Adjustment
has expired. The Carrboro Board of Adjustment recommends that Ms.
Suggs be reappointed to a term expiring in October, 1979..
Upon motion of Commissioner Gustaveson, seconded by Commissioner
Whitted, it was moved and adopted that Faye Suggs be reappointed to
the Carrboro Board of Adjustment to a term expiring in October, 1979.
G. The term of Mr. Aallas Alford on the Carrboro Board of Adjust-
ment has expired. The Carrboro Board of Aldermen recommends Mr. Alford
be reappointed to a term expiring October, 1979.
Upon motion of Commissioner Gustaveson, seconded by Commissioner
Pinney, it was moved and adopted that Dallas Alford be reappcihted to
the Carrboro Board of Adjustment to a term expiring October, 1979.
H. Mr. Norris Ray has resigned from the Carrboro Planning Board.
His term expires in September of 1979. The Carrboro Board of Aldermen
has made no recommendation for Mr. Ray's replacement.
This item was deferred until a later date.
I. Ms. Sue Arrington, nominated by Commissioner Whitted to the
Recreation Advisory Committee, has resigned. A replacement should be
named.
Upon motion of Commissioner Whitted, seconded by Commissioner
Gustaveson, it was moved and adopted that James Tate of Efland be
appointed to replace Ms. Sue Arrington to the Tecreation Advisory
Committee .
J. Mr. Dan Kensil's term on the Durham-Orange Employment Training
Service Council has expired. Mr. Kensil does not desire to continue
serving. Mr. J. L. Prystrup has been recommended as a replacement.
Upon motion of Commissioner Gustaveson, seconded by Commissioner
Whitted, it was moved and adopted that Mr. J. L. Prystrup be named to
the Durham-Orange Employment Training Service Advisory Council.
K. Mr. Ebert Pierce does not desire to continue serving on the
Durham-Orange Employment and Training Service Council. Mrs. Joyce
Stanford has been suggested as a replacement.
Upon motion of Commissioner Gustaveson, seconded by Commissioner
Walker, it was moved and adopted that Joyce Stanford be appointed as
a member of the Durham-Orange Employment Training Advisory Council.
L. One consumer should be named to the Durham-Orange Employment
Training Service Council.
This item was deferred until a later meeting.
M. The Board of Commissioners should name one of its members or
a designee to serve on the Durham-Orange Employment and Training Ser-
vice. At the present time. Chairman Garrett is serving as the local
governments representative on this Board.
The item was deferred until a later time. ~
The Chairman referred to Item 4: Will the Board of Commissioners
request Governor Holshouser petition the President of the United States
to declare Orange County a natural disaster area as a result of the pro-
longed draught that commended in February of 1976, and is continuing
at this .time.
The County Manager explained that the Agricultural Stablization
and Conservation Committee was the body recommending this action. Tie
stated this action would qualify farmers for low interest rate loans.
Tha Governor has this year requested the County Commissioners to peti-
tion him to take action. This was previously done by the ACS Committee
and the Civil Preparedness.
Upon motion of Commissioner Whitted, seconded by Commissioner
Gustaveson, it was moved and adopted that the Board petition Governor
Holshouser to petition the President of the United States to declare
Orange County a natural disaster area as the result of the recent
drought.
ltem 5: Report on the result of competitive bids for tape re-
cording equipment.
The agenda attachment stated that Orange County has been awarded
LEAA funds to acquire a ten channel tape recording device. The State
LEAA has approved Orange County using these grant funds to acquire a
twenty channel recording unit if the cost differential is raised
locally. The'Joint Orange-Chatham Emergency Medical Services Council
_ will provide through the Johnson Foundation funds the cost differential
to acquire the larger and more expensive unit.
The County Manager recommends the County accept the bid evalua-
tion secured by the North Carolina Department of Natural and Economic
Resources by purchasing the twenty channel Magnasync recorder at a
price of $15,325.
Upon motion of Commissioner Pinney, seconded by Commissioner.
Whitted, it was moved and adapted that the County purchase the twenty
channel Magnasync recorder at a price of $15,325.
Commissioner Gustaveson moved that the proper appropriation be
approved for the budget and that the adoption of a Project Ordinance
rather than a Budget Ordinance for the appropriation of the EMS
Communications System be taken care of later in the day.
There was no second to this motion, however the Board did so agree.
The Chairman referred to Item 7: The Manager recommends adoption
of a resolution similiar to the one submitted endorsing the Hillsborough
201 Plan.
"WHEREAS, the consulting engineering firm of Wiggins-Rimer
and Associates has prepared a 201 Wastewater Facilities Plan
in accordinace with the regulations of Public Law 92-5D0 far
the designated Hillsborough 201 Wastewater Facilities Planning
area located in Orange County, North Carolina; and
WHEREAS, the Facilities Plan, as prepared, has evaluated the
present wastewater treatment and collection practices, imple-
mented by the Twon iNi the facilities planning area, with
alternative wastewater treatment methods, and has evaluated
the alternatives on the basis of cost effectiveness and environ-
mental soundness; and
WHERE, after a public hearing held on October 4, 1976, and
further review of the total plan, Wiggins-Rimer and Associates
has recommended alternative 'A', NO ACTION, as the mast cost
effective and environmentally sound wastewater treatment strategy;
NOW, THEREFORE, upon the motion of County-Commissioner Jan.Pinn.ey,
seconded by Commissioner County Commissioner Norman Gustaveson,
and unanimously adopted by the Board of County Commissioners of
Orange Gounty, North Carolina;
BE IT RESOLVED that alternative 'A', NO ACTION, of the 201
Wastewater Facilities Plan for the Hillsborough Planning Area
is hereby approved.
ADOPTED, this the lst day of November, 1976."
Upon motion of Commissioner Pinney, seconded by Commissioner
Gustaveson, it was moved and adopted that the Resolution endorsing
the Hillsborough 2D1 Plan be approved.
The'Chairman referred to Item 8: Residents of the Colonial Hills
area have petitioned the Board of Commissioners to approve a "Partici-
pating Paving Program" in their area.
The Manager recommends this petition be acknowledged, and the
petiticners advised their project will be considered when particip-
ating paving projects are again reviewed by the Board of Commissioners.
Upon motion of Commissioner Gustaveson, seconded by Commissioner
Pinney, it was moved and adopted that the Board of Commissioners acknow-
ledge the receiving of the petition from the residents of the Colonial
Hills area and inform them that their request will be considered when
the Commissioners again review the participating paving program and when
funds are again available.
Item 9: The State Department of Transportation has advised the --
Board of Commissioners additional funds for secondary road work have
been allocated Orange County. At present, the Department of Transport-
ation proposes these funds be devoted to work on Old Highway $6. -
Commissioner Gustaveson moved that the Board accept the Department
of Transportation's recommendation for work on Highway 86.
Commissioner Pinney seconded this motion.
Discussion ensued. Commissioner Whitted stated that he felt there
were other roads with higher priorities in the County than Old #86. He
spoke of the need for Lawrence Road to be completed and he requested
that the Board reject the recommendation of the Department of Trans-
portation.
Further discussion ensued. It was pointed out that Lawrence Road
could be completed, however, there was not enough funds available to
complete improvement on Hwy. 86.
Upon motion of Commissioner Walker, seconded by Commissioner
Whitted, it was moved and adopted that this matter be tabled until the
next meeting of the Commissioners and to request that a representative
from the Department of Transportation be present at the next meeting
to discuss with the Board Old Hwy. #86 as opposed to Lawrence Road
and the monies required fro these roads.
The Chairman referred to Item 12: Will the Board of Commissioners
designate 12:00 Noon on Monday, December 6, 1976, as the time for a
public hearing to consider closing of Cedar Creek Drive in the Hidden
Hills Subdivision located in Eno Township of Orange County.
This item was temporary deferred.
The Chairman referred to Item.17: The Finance Director recommends
the adoption of a Project Ordinance rather than a Budget Ordinance
Amendment for the formal appropriation of the EMS Communications System.
A memorandum from the Finance Director explained that the purpose
of this action as recited in Section 150-13.2 of the N.C. General
Statutes, adopted by the 1975 General Assembly, separates projects
such as the EMS Communications system, out of the normal budget process,
while still retaining other standaxd budgetary elements. A Capital Pro-
ject Ordinance will not have to be considered every year for appropriatian,
but it is subject to amendment, subject to audit, and subject to being
included in the Manager's annual budget submission for information pur-
poses. A separate group o~ accounts will be kept for this project.
Upon motion of Commissioner Gustaveson, seconded by Commissioner
Pinney, it was moved and adopted to accept the Finance Director's re-
commendation to adopt a Project Ordinance rather than a Budget Ordin-
ance Amendment for the formal appropriation of the EMS Communications
System.
The Board reviewed the Emergency Medical Service Communications
System Project Ordinance and requested that Items 1, 3, and 4 of the
Ordinance be changed to reflect the addition of the tape recording
equipment which was approved earlier in the meeting
Commissioner Gustaveson amended his motion to include the approval
of the tape recording equipment.
(Fox copy of the Project Ordinance see page of .this book.)
The Chairman called for the vote on the motion and all membexs of
the Board voted aye. The motion was declared passed.
Chairman Garrett referred again to Item 12: Wi11 the Board of
Commissioners designate 12:00 Noon on Monday, December 6, 1976, as
the time for a public hearing to consider closing of Cedar Creek Drive
in the Hidden Hills Subdivision.
Chairman Garrett read the Resolution designating 12:00 Noon on
Monday, December 6, 1976, as the time for a public hearing as so
stated.
- (For copy of resolution see page of this book).
_ Upon motion of Commissioner Gustaveson, seconded by Commissioner
Pinney, it was moved and adopted that 12:00 Noon on Monday, December
fi, 1976, be the time for a public hearing to consider closing of Cedar
Creek Drive in the Hidden Hills Subdivision.
,
Chairman Garrett referred to Item 18: The Department of Txans-
portation recommends addition of the Norman Walker Road to the second-
ary road system.
Upon .motion of Commissioner Gustaveson, seconded by Commissioner
Pinney, it was moved and adapted that the Norman Walker Road be accepted
as addition to the secondary road system.
Item 14: The Manager recommends a new position, Eligibility
Specialist T, be created and the reclassification of one Eligibility
Specialist I to Eligibility 5peci.alist~II be allowed within the Depart-
ment of Social Services.
Chairman Garrett stated that the Orange County Department of Social
Services would place one Social Service Eligibility Specialist I in the
N. C. Memorial Hospital full time to accept and document Medicaid appli-
cations. Memorial Hospital will bear the full non federal cost of salary,
travel and all fringe benefits, and in addition, pay a percentage of time
for supervision by a present staff member.
Upon motion of Commissioner Gustaveson, seconded by Commissioner
Pinney, it was moved and adopted that the Berard accept the Manager's
recommendation to create a new position, Eligibility Specialist I, and
the reclassification of one Eligibility Specialist I to Eligibility
Specialist II be allowed within the Department of Social Services.
The Chairman referred to Item 15: Chairman Garrett will review
a calendar prepared by Mr. James Webb, Architect developing the Mental
Health Center Project, relating to completion of the center.
The Chairman stated that she had met with Mr. Bill Baxter, the
new director of Orange-Person-Chatham Mental Health Center, and James
.Webb, the Architect who is working on the Mental Health Project in the
Northside Community. The Chairman reviewed a schedule which was pre-
pared by Mr. Webb relating to the completion of the Center. The Chair-
man explained that work is now in the second submission phase and that
documents are to be submitted to the Facility Service in Raleigh by
November 3rd. The final drawings will be submitted sometime near
January 10, 1977. They are hoping to advertise for bids February 14,
1977, with construction to begin in the Spring.
Mrs. Garrett suggested that the Board meet with the Orange°Person-
- Chatham Mental Health people to review the project and to be brought
up.ta date on teh activities involved.
Commissioner Gustaveson suggested that the Board set a date for
this meeting later in the day.
Chairman Garrett referred to Item 13: The Director of the Council
on Aging has requested his Department's Office be moved from their
present site in the County Agriculture Building to the Hillsborough
Town Hall. Office space at this site (two rooms and utilities) can be
acquired for $150. per month.
Commissioner Gustaveson questioned why the Town of Hillsborough
would not pay the rental charge of $150. for the office space. He
questioned the rental charge of an agency that provided services to
the citizens of the Town. He stated that he felt the cost of utilities
would be fair, however, he did not feel the County should pay rent.
Chairman Garrett stated that she' agreed with Mr. Gustaveson.
Dr. Martin stated that his Board had discussed same logical way
to agree upon a fair contribution from the Towns of Chapel Hill, Carrboro,
Hillsborough, and the County. He recommended that the municipalities
and the County get together and agree on a contribution, based on popu-
lation ox some other principal.
Discussion ensued. The Board asked the County Manager and Commis-
sioner Whitted to investigate and discuss the matter further with the
Town of Hillsborough. The Chairman asked that a recommendation be pre-
pared by the next meeting. -
Chairman Garrett referred to Item 6: The Recreation Department
and the Recreation Advisory Council have prepared a schedule of charges
recommended for the use of their facilities.
Mr. Wayne Weston, the Recreation Director, recognized Mr. Sob
Strayhorn and Mr. Donald Roberts, members of the Recreation Advisory
Council. Mr. Weston stated that the Recreation Department and the
Recreation Advisory Council i.s proposing a system of fees and charges
based on the concept that programs or activities of a special interest,
designed to appeal to a limited group, should be paid for by that group
and not financed from the general budget of the Recreation Department.
Discussion ensued concerning the building rentals. Mr. Gustaveson
stated that he felt there should be some mechanism to distinguish bet-
ween private grops and clubs, and activities which are open to all County
residents. He stated that he felt the basic philosophy should include
the fact that the Recreation Bua~ldings and Facilities would be rented to
the public only when not being used for Recreation Department sponsored
programs. He requested that there be more definitions under Charitable,
Civic, Religious, Educational (non-profit) so that the nature of the
meetings would be very clear and therefore, enable the Advisory Council
to make decisions as to the use of the facilities based on criteria as
set out.
The Board reviewed the Program Services/Rates. Discussion ensued
concerning the waivor of charges for participants who could not affort
to pay a charge.
Commissioner Walker moved that the Board approve the Recreation
proposal as it is written. Commissioner Pinney seconded the motion.
Dicussion ensued. Commissioner Gustaveson requested that the
motion be changed to read that the Board accepts the proposal instead
of approving it. He stated that he felt the Board needed to meet .with
the Recreation Advisory Council for further dialogue.
Commissioner Whitted stated that he felt the Recreation Department
needed to have the Board's approval if they were to use this proposal.
Commissioner Pinney called for the question.
Chairman Garrett called for a vote on the motion of Commissioner
Walker that the Board accept for approval the Recsreation Department
and the Recreation Advisory Council schedule fox charges and fees as
outlined. All members of the Board voted aye and the motion was de-
clared passed.
For copy of Fee Schedules see page of this book•
Item 11: The Planning Director will briefly review his department's
work plan for use ox 701 funds.
Mr. Ervin Dobson, Planning Director, presented to the Board a
proposed work schedule for his Department, to be approved at a future
work session. He stated that the Department's work plan was submitted
to the Department of Natural, Economic and Resources earlier. $1,800.
has already been requisitioned for the first quarter for planning efforts
which dealt with the proposed zoning amendments and future zoning pra^
grams for the County. Mr. Dobson stated that his Department did need
for the Planning Board and Staff, and the County Commissioners to sit
down and talk about the total work program in order for the Planning
Department to know where it was going in setting of time frames and
goals.
The Planning Director stated that in ordex to get the $7,000. from
the 701 Grant, an overall program design draft must be submitted by
March 31, 1977, to the Department of Natural, Economic and Resources.
He requested a work session at some future date to discuss the work
plan of his department.
Chairman Garrett referred to Item 16: Mr. Gene Owens, District
5oi1 Conservationist, will review a new project plan developed for the
-- North Central Piedmont Resources Conservation and Development District.
Mr. Owens desires the Commissioners' endorsement of this plan.
Mr. Owens stated that in 1967, the North Central Piedmont Resource
Conservation and Development project was developed which included six
counties. Since that time, Randolph County has been added to the
District. He presented to the Board a copy of the work plan which was
developed in 1967, and explained that the project had been amended many
times and had recently been updated to reflect these changes with stata-
tical data and project measures. Mr. Owens stated that he was present
to request the Board's approval of the plan.
Mr. Stewart Barbour asked permission to speak. He stated that he
was present to speak against the plan. He stated that he did have a
quarrel with any items which threaten his property or which appears to
be included chiefly as the result of maneuvering by a small, special
interest group. Mr. Barbour stated that he felt this was an effort to
get RC&D monies involved in so called land acquisition schemes in Orange
County. He requested that the Commissioners refer this plan back to its
drafters to eliminate controversial Eno items, or that the Board approve
the plan except for the Eno item, ar that the Board approve the plan
with the written stipulation that no RC&D monies be used unless the
State first renounces the use of condemnation of agricultural lands in
the Eno River Valley.
Mr. Owens stated that in discussion involving around Project
Measure #29, which contains the possibility of RC&D cost sharing on
land with the State Parks for additions to the State Park on the Eno
River, the feelings were that this would be on land where there would
be willing sellers and he did not see that this was a conflict with
Mr. Harbour's position. He stated that there was no change in the
revised RC&D plan from the old plan in relation to the project measure
which Mr. Barbour opposes.
Discussion ensued. Mrs. Josephine Barbour stated that she felt
this was a threat to landowners who are opposed .to~a part in their
backyard.
Mr. Owens assured the Harbours and the Board that any project
undertaken by RC&D would have local input.
Commissioner Gustaveson moved that the Board approve the amended
version of the Resource Conservation and Development plan as it is pre-
sently writeen. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Whitted.
Further discussion ensued. Mr. Barbour again asked that the
County Board of Commissioners not approve the revised RC&D plan because
he felt it did pose a threat to his property.
- Chairman Garrett stated that she felt there was some endorsement
present in the plan and she was not sure of what the plan was endorsing.
Commissioner Pinney asked that Commissioner Gustaveson's motion be
amended. That the Board approve the amended version of the Resource
Conservation and Development plan with the stipulation that the Commis-
sioner's Policy Statement on the Eno River be adhered to with respect
to the RG&D funds and that all projects affecting the Eno River come
before this Board far final approval.
Commissioner Walker seconded the amended motion.
The Chairman called for the vote on the amended motion. All
members of the Board voted aye and the motion was declared passed.
The Chairman referred to Item 19: Representatives of the audit
firm, Peat, Marwick and Mitchell, will review the annual County audit.
Terry White, Manager of the Greensboro Office of Peat, Marwick and
Mitchell and Phil Amean, Senior Supervisor of the County audit, reviewed
with the Board the audit conducted for 1976.
A question and answer period ensued.
Commissioner Gustaveson stated that he had an item which he would
like to discuss briefly and that is to ask the County Attorney to check
out the State Statutes concerning Planning Boards and the limitation of
members. Chairman Garrett stated that this had already been checked
out and there was no limitation.
Mr. Gustaveson also asked that research be done regarding member-
ship to Planning Boards by members who live outside zoned areas. The
Chairman stated that this matter had also been checked. .
Commissioner Gustaveson then inquired about the period of time
needed for an amendment to the organization of the Planning Board.
Chairman Garrett stated that'.there would have to be a public hear-
ing and this was found in the Zoning Ordinance.
Discussion ensued as to whether a public hearing was required or
if this was governed ley the General Statutes. The Board agreed that
a clarification on this matter was needed.
The Chairman recognized A. B. Coleman, Jr., County Attorney, to
discuss with the Board his legal opinion concerning the Chapel Hill-
Carrboro Meals on Wheels program. He stated that his opinion at this
time was that an appropriation should not be made by this Board to
the program. He stated that he had discovered that the Meals on Wheels
was not, a present, a corporation and that this Board needed to deter-
mine whether this future private corporation would be providing a public
service or not. He stated that the Board needed to make that judgement
with respect to each program that is presented to the Board for a do-
nation of money.
The County Attorney stated that it was his opinion that the County
should not purchase memberships to the Chapel Hill-Garrboro Chamber of
Commerce because this membership did not serve a public purpose. The
County Attorney stated that considerable restraints should be used in
these areas, and that in some cases, the decision would be left up to
the Board as to whether or not to support the program. He stated the
General Statutes contained a general shopping list about programs the
Board can spend money on,'however, that Statute is controlled by the
Constitution, and the Constitution limits the Board in the expenditures
of public funds.
Discussion ensued concerning programs which can be financially
supported by the County. The Board agreed that the County Manager
should write letters to the Chapel Hill-Garrboro Chamber of Commerce
and to the Chapel Hi11-Garrboro Meals vn Wheels Coordinator, Mrs. Sophia
Martin, to explain the findings of the County Attorney.
The Board of Commissioners adjourned for lunch.
The afternoon poxtion of the Commissioners' meeting was a work
session to discuss priorities for the coming year, and to work on a
time schedule for items which have already been started.
The County Manager informed the Board that last October, the Board
had made application to LEAA for an additional ambulance and that the
application had been approved.
The Board agreed that they needed tv set a schedule to accomplish
or resolve the items which were listed by Mr. Gustaveson and Mx's.
Garrett.
Mr. Gustaveson stated that he would like to see the items organized
into some kinds of general logical categories and put into a workbook so
that the Commissioners could keep a clear up-dated schedule; policy state-
ment and relative information. He stated that the Commissioners could
follow this and keep informed of development in certain areas.
Commissioner Walker suggested that the Board review the Dog Program.
He stated that the Dog Pound had been an urgent matter for a long time.
Commissioner Pinney stated that the County had been waiting for
Chapel Hill and were still waiting.
Chairman Garrett stated that she felt a letter should be sent to
Chapel Hill and inform them that the County was ready to proceed and
asked them if they are interested in proceeding. If not, the County
should proceed on their own.
The County Manager informed the Board that at arecent meeting with
Chapel Hill's Management and Planning Staff, and the County's Management
and Planning Staff, bath Chapel Hill and the Ccunty had agreed to evalu-
ate and identify sites for a Dog Pound. The County Planning Department
has identified two sites and they have not heard from Chapel Hill.
Discussion ensued concerning Chapel Hill's intent regarding a joint
Dog Pound. ~
The consensus of the Board was that a letter be sent to Chapel Tull
and set a deadline for plans and discussion by the end of the year. If
the Board has not heard by the end of the year, the County will proceed
on their own.
The next item for discussion was water resources.
Commissioner Walker read a letter from Dr. CoroDon Fuller, District
Health Director, endorsing the B. Everette Jordan Land and Dam.
Commissioner Whitted stated that he did not think Orange County
should seriously consider the Jordan Lake in meeting future water needs.
He stated that he did not think the lake would be filled and if it was
filled, it would not be the quality of water that could be used.
Commissioner Walker stressed the need to develop information in
order to answer some of the technical questions which were asked recently
• at the Cane Creek public meeting regarding the Cane Creek project.
Chairman Garrett stated that many answers to these questions are
found in the Corp of Engineers Reprot on the B. Everette Jordan Lake
and Dam.
Further discussion ensued concerning Dr. Fuller's letter. The
Board stated that they felt Dr. Fuller should .come before the Board and
make a full statement regarding what he knows about the safety of the
water of the B. Everette Jordan Lake and Dam.
Commissioner Gustaveson stated that .he felt a coordinating body
should be formed to review all the issues related to water resources
in the area. He stated that there are many separate things, but all
are related.
The Board deferred from its work session to hear from the Soil
Conservationist, Gene Owens, regarding the revised RC&D Project Plan.
Mr. Owens stated that Raleigh has suggested that a Resolution from the
County Commissioners be initiated stating that the Berard approve the
RC&D Project Plan as revised with the stipulation that the Commissioners
Policy Statement on the Eno River be adhered to with zespect to the
RC&D funds and that all projects affecting the Eno River came before
the Board of Commissioners for final approval.
The Board agreed that this was the correct procedures.
"WHEREAS, the North Central Piedmont Resource Conservation and
Development Project Plan contains several project measures
regarding the Eno River and its environs, and
WHEREAS, The Orange County Board of Cormn9.ssioners has developed
a policy statement regarding the Eno River and its environs,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Orange County Board of
Commissioners da endorse and sponsor the North Central Piedmont
Resource Conservation and Development Project Plan as revised in
July, 1976, with the requirement that the Orange County Board of
Commissioners' Policy Statement, adopted May 11, 1976, on the Eno
River be adhered to with respect to the Resource Conservation and
Development Funds and that all projects affecting the .Eno River
and its environs come before the said Board of Commissioners for
their final approval."
Discussion continued concerning the Cane Creek project. The Board
agreed that there should be a response to the recent meeting with the
Orange Water-Sewer Authority as to whether or not the County would build
the Cane Creek Reservoir. Commissioner Pinney stated that there were
many questions that needed to be answered far the people in Cane Creek
area.
Commissioner Whitted stated that at this present time, there were
no ways of telling what restrictions would be applied in years to come.
Chairman Garrett stated that it probably would be good if the
County took the initiative to set up a committee of members of the
Board, members of the Water-Sewer Authority, and Cane Creek property
owners to talk about some of the questions that had been raised. She
stated further that after the coming Thursday's night meeting, (Nov. 4,
1976) she felt there would be a formal response form the Authority as
to the building of the Cane Creek Reservoir. Commissioner Whitted
stated that the County should have a list of questions and concerns
which the committee could address.
Discussion ensued concerning the County building the Cane Creek
Reservoir. Commissioner Whitted stated that he felt that~.if. the
County consented to build the reservoir, they should own the land and
reservoir 100 percent.
The Board instructed the staff to prepare a list of questions
and concerns to coordinate with the list which the Commissioners shall
prepare. This list should be ready by the next joint meeting with the
Water-Sewer Authority. Chairman Garrett stated that she could see the
need of knowledgeable source of advise to inform the Commissioners about
the best way to manage a reservoir.
Chairman Garnett reviewed with the Board the upcoming meeting
scheduled.
Tuesday, November 9, 1976, a lunch and tour with the ABC Board.
Friday, November 5, 1976, a luncheon with Orange-Person-Chatham
Mental Health Board at the Pines Restaurant. This meeting is to be
with the Orange County members to the Mental Health Board and James
Webb, Architect of the Northside Building.
The Board scheduled Tuesday, November 9, 1976, at 7:30 p.m. as
a work session. This meeting to be at the Municipal Building in Chapel
Hi11. Mr. Gattis was requested to contact Mr. Joe Nassif and request
him to be present at this meeting. The Board stated that they would
like to talk about the Planning Department's Land Use Plan on Tuesday
Night.
Discussion ensued between the County Manager and members of the
Board regarding the survey done by John Stott far Recreation at Seven
Mile Creek. The County Manager was requested to contact Mr. Stott and
see what the cost would be far updating this report.
The meeting was adjourned.
~~~~~ ~
Flora Garrett, Chairman
Betty June Hayes, Clerk t
,R~LUI'IOl`[ ~ ~ a }3C1~RD OF ODN2~ffSSIOlvr.'"~S of intent to close the northern one-
half of the cei7. d° sac at the nox-thern fermi-nus of Cer3ar' Cre~c Drive wni.ch abuts only
the prop~y of the petitioners herein.
~~. petitioners Randolph ~. Lambe and zri.fe, Catherine U. ~, George M.
I,y~, ,fir. and wife, Donna Lyon, have filed a petition before the Baax'd of County Coirma.ssio~:.
to close one-half of the cul 'de sac on Cedar Creels Drive, a pox'tion of which is within
~~-a-ham County and a Po~-on of which a.s withi.n Orange County, abutti.z~g the prop~~-Y ~-ed
the petitioners: and .
--- y~~, it appears fcam the petition filet herein that said road has never' bcer~.
opemecl. and that the only delication th°xeOf i.s on a plat filed in the office of the'Registex'
of Deeds of Durham County in Plat Back 9~9, Page S. .
~, it appears that nO individual, firm or ao_T'~aratian owns property i_n the
tracinity of said road. without a reasonable means of ingress and egress to his p~perty; axa:::.
y,5, it is the intent of the Hoard of (7ctiuzty Cca~missianers to close that
partiarz of Cedar Creek Drive .described. as fgllaws:
rS~IlV~i[ING at a stake in the prop~"tl' line on the west side of the cul de sac at the naxthE ... .
erx3 of Cedar Creek Drive, which stake is the northeast corner of property of Louis Rir]ar~n
and wife and r,~ nir~ thence along and With Said Gw1. de Saci the radius of which=iS 50 fc~r:
as it Curves 3r- a clockwise direction a distance of 78.57 feet to a stake,: thence contiaui~:
along arx9.with the radius of the cut de sac in a cloc3cwi-se direction a distance of 78.57
feet to a stake which is the southxvast corner of pmp~Y of Randolph L. Lamb and wife;
.,.e,~ce N 88° 17' W 100 feet to the point and place of ~[G, this area being the
;~~-+,.hp.,,Z'jj one-half of said cu]. de sac at the northe~xs ~. of Cedar Creek Drive.
_ That Prior to a deci.Sion on the guestiozi, a publ.i.c hearing sha71 be held at
the Orange County Board of Canmissionaxs Rxan in the County Offa.ce Building a.n Hi-7lsboraugY:,.
North Ca~'r3Lina, on the ~ day of 1976, at '~.'CO ,~ m. and
. a copy of this resolution be published in the News of Grange Oounty once a oreek far four (~?',
successive weeks before said hearing and that a aopy of same be sent by certified mail to
~.ch ow:lex of property adjoining that portion of saSrd road to Ise closed. and that a nati.ce
of said public hearing be prr~m;nPn~y posted is. at least two (2) places along the road too
be closed as required byA .N,~orth Caro ~na~ al Statute L53A 241.. .. '
This. the ~ Y_ - ~y of~~~-~ =~, 1976.
aR~N~ ~ Ha~D aF cor~ussxo~rs
(S) Flora R. Garrett (,~,~j.-
~' ore Garx'ett, Chairman
(S) Richard [Vhitted (SEAL.
Richard E. Whitted
(S) Norman Walker ~ (SFA'[_., .
Norman Walker
(S) Normman Gustaveson (SEAT.:
- Norman Gustaveson
(S) ~7an Pinney ($E71T.::
fan Pixntey
-,
F. ..~
_. ORA.~TGE COCTN'rY
Y, Betty June dyes. Secretary of the Board of County Camtissioners, do hereby
:~ certify that the foregoing ~ a true copy of gesolutions fox closing the northern one-
half of the cu]. de sac at the northexn terminus of Cedar Cr~k Drive, Orange County,
~~ Caro7;,,a. Said resolutions recorded in Minute Book 10 page
Witness my hand and official seal of the County. this 1st day of
Novem]aer .
X}~ 1976.
(S) Betty June Hayes
Clerk of the Board of County Commissioners, Orange Caur
North Caml, na
ORANGE COUNTY, N. G.
EMERGENCY MEDICAI. SERVICES COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEM
PROJECT ORDINANCE
WHEREAS The Board of Commissioners of Orange County has agreed to implement.
a Communications System for the Emergency Medical Services, a project which in-
volves the acquisition of a capital asset, and,
L~JNEREAS sufficient funds are available to Orange County from the State of
North Carolina and the Robert Woods Johnson Foundation to provide a balanced
budget wherein revenues available for the project are equal to the appropriations.
NOW THEREFORE, The Board of Commissioners of Orange County, North Carolina,
in regular session assembled, do ordain; that:
1. Two hundred seventy seven thousand four hundred sixty six dollars
($277,406.00) be appropriated for a Emergency Medical System; and
2. The sum of seventy thousand one hundred eighty do11ars ($705180.00)
from the State of North Carolina; and
3. Two hundred seven thousand two hundred eighty six dollars
($207,286.00) from the Robert Woods Johnson Foundation is estimated to be avail-
able for the completion of this project; and
4. This ordinance shall be entered into the minutes of the Board of
Commissioners of Orange County, and copies of the ordinance will be filed with ,
the Finance Officer, the Budget Officer, and the Clerk to the Board within five
days of its adoption.
Adopted this the First day of November, 1976.
c
„_
SYSTEI~'1
FEES AND CHARGES
~'DR I2ECFtEATIaN SERVICES
Policy Philoso?v:
The Orange County Recreation and Parks Department has established
its system of fees and charges on the basis that programs or
facilities of a unique or specific interest be promoted for the
benefit of these individuals desiring the particular advantages to
be derived. Due to the unique status of said endeavor, the
pxagram or facility in question would not be administered,
nor operated at the non-interested taxpayer's cast. Therefore,
delegating a special interest program which operates an the
foundation of self-sustenance.
Recreation Building and Facilities Renta7.s: Rented to the publ ic
ONLX when riot being used for department sponsored programs.
A. Orange County Pecreation Center:
Commezical Pro=_notion
1. Large Activity Room
Day use (8:00 A. M. - 5:00 P. M.)- - ., - - - - - - 125.00
Night use (6:ODP. M. --1:00 A. M.) ---------- 225.00
Hourly use (Day or Night) -- - -- -- -- - - -- - - -- - 20.00
2. Small Activity Room -
Day use (8:00 A. M. - 5:00 P. M.) -- - - - - -- - - - - 85.00
Night use (6:00 P. M. - 1:00 A. M.) -- --.- - - - - - - 110.00
Hourly use (Day or Night) - -- -- -- - - -- - -- ~ -- -__... 20.00
3. Gymnasiu.~ Area _ ~=_
Day use (8:00 - 5:00 P. M. ) - ~- - •- _ _ _ _ _ - ~:.. 1'75, 00
Night use (6:00 P. ri. - 1:00 A. M.) - -. - - - - _
' 250.00
Hourly use (Day or Night) -.- - - - --~ - - - -- - - +=. =
~ 20.00
-
~
:
B. Chaiztable, Civic, Relic(ious, Educational (Non--Profit) ~~•_-
l. Large Activity Room __=
Day use (8:00 A. rA. - 5:00 P. N1.)- - - - - - - - ,_ "75.00
Na.ght use (6:00 P. M.•- 1:00 A. M.) - - - - - - - - 100.00
FIour].yuse (Day or Night) ----------------- 15.00
i
I
-- 2. Sall r_ctivi ty Roam
0 P
,,, _ _
Id
) ~ -
_ .-' _ •- 50.00
Da~° usY (8:00 A. rI. .
- 5:
00
-- 1 .
.. _
T•1.) -- _
71 _ _ .. -~ 75.00
Night ti:sa (6:00 I?. :
M. .
r ~ .. _ .. ]_5.00
Fiourl« use (D ;y oz T3ight) - _ .. _ .- --
3. Gy:^nasi~w:~ Area
se (8:00 A.
M.
-- 5:00 P. ~ _ _ _
M'.)- _ .. _ _ 125.00
•
Day u
Fight use (6:00
P.
Ni. •- 1:00
A. M.)-
-
"..-_" .. _ ,., l
75,00
^ W 15
00
hourly Lase (Day or Bight) - N
^
w .
Food Service:
A charge of 0.10 per person will be levied against all caterers,
groups ar individuals who cater or serve food in the Orange Gounty
Recreation Center, subject to a maximum total of 100.00. Prior
ap roval of suc'_? caterers ar server is re wired by the Health
Department.
Additional Services
Special Police and/or firemen'-- arrangements made through proper
department, at the expense of the renting party- The renting party
is responsible for maintenance of order; therefore. contract with
an auxiliary police officer or off duty officer is requited before
any dance is held in the Orange County Recreation Center.
Application For Use
Forty percent (40~) of the total rental fee is required at thraormandf
reservation which must be submitted one (1) month (30 days) p
the remaining sixty percent (60~) is due two (2) weeks before the day
the Center is to be used. A tentative reservation may be held for
a period of two (2) weeks frazn the time of inquiry without a fee.
Rental fees are r_at refundable except when in 'the opinipn of the
Recreation Advisory Council, the circumstances warrant.
Responsibility For Damage:
The party signing the application for the use of said facilities will
be responsible to the County for all damage to property and
equipment in the Center, other than ordinary wear and tear.
~~
~,
Program Services/Rates
Tnstructionwl Cl~:sses: The classes listed .below are taught in tha var:i.c~; '
com~'nunity facili::ies depending upon the type of facility needed.
Classificaticn r: Instructors in every case are paid 75~ of the grass
revenue from each class.
1. Gymnastics - Six (6) one (1) hour lessons @ 6.00/participant
2. Ballroom Dance r 10x00/single (2) hour lessons @ 1x.00/coupler
3. Ballet: hour lessons @ 15.00/particip_~
a, Children - Ten (10) one (1)
b.' Adult -- Ten (10) one (1) hour lessons @ 15.00/participant
ec, }'qga - Ten (10) one (7-) hour lessons @ 15.00/participant
5, Physical Firmness - Six (6)'one (1) hour lessons @ 6.00/participant
6. Bridge -- Sig: (6) Tt~o• (2) hour lessons @ 12.00/participant
7. Archery Six (6) one (1) hour lessons @ 6.00/participant
8. Horseback Riding -~ Five (S) one & one half (1'~) hour lessons @
25.00/participant
9. Kung Fu -- Six (6) tcro (2) hour lessons @ 25.00/couple
l0. .Karate - Six (n) t~•ro (2) hour lessons @ 15.00/participant
Classification 3: Ynstructors in every case are paid 100 through area::
Technical Institute Adult Education I?rograms. (All
generated revenues in accordance with continuing educs:'.:.
requirements, are collected by or. submitted to the
technical institute providing the suppor~.)
1. Cake Decorating -Bight three (3) hour lessons @ 3.00 ~t- Supplies
2, Leathercraft - Eight (8) two (2) hour lessons @ 3.00 + Supplies
3. Holiday Arts and Crafts - Four (~4) two (2) hour lessons @ 3.00
4. Athle•kic Officials Clinics - Twelve (12) three (3) hour lessons @ ::~
5: Flower Arrangement ^ Bight (8).three (3) hour lessons @ 3.00
6. Interior Decorating Eight (8) three (3) hour lessons @ 3.00
7, .Creative rea3lepoint -- Bight {8) three (3) hour lessons @ 18.00
8. Beginners Art - Eight ($) three (3} hour lessons @ 3._00 -h Supplies
Classification C: Instructors in every case are-paid 1~10~ through lar_~.,'
budget funds; however generated revenues are uti].a.zr--'-
to offset salaries.
].. Tennis - r^ive (5) two (2) hour lessons @ 10.00/adult;~8'10/00/child
2. S~•rimmiry - Five (5) two (2) hour lessons @ ].2.00/adult;
3. Golf _ Fi~~e (5) two (2) hour lessons @ 10.00/adult; 8,00/child
~,._. ~ .
Organized Adult Athletics: Entry fees are highly flexible and are afr"
by league size, number of trophies, and le u
of tournaments. The basic fees, however a:
determined by the costs of the score keeper
and game officials. Approx. 75~ sustainir_ej.
r' )
r
A;iult
Field '.Cxips: '=~=s==a°1On fees are established per participant in
~~,-.~_~_^aY :aith total cast of txansportatian, lodging
r_a~.s, ~~c. '
Classification ~: '=our-h Services offered by The Oranae County Recreation
and Parks Department on a A'o Fee Basis
1. Summer Fun Ra~:er Program (Summer ].975 and 1976) - Generalized
program whic~ -mates in all desiring communities i•~ith activities
in arts and cra=ts, humanitias, sports and games, etc.
a.' Field i_i_ s
1. Pullen Park, Raleigh, N.•C.
2. The i;SS `:arth Carolina, `~iilmington, N. C.
3: FIage=sto'-^_e Park, Greensboro, N. G.
4. Dan tiichalas Park Salisbury, N. C.
5. Tar_glexood Park, Clemmons, N. C.
6. Ca?rpi=-7 grip, Bristol Creek Ranch, Morganton, N. C.
7. navies ;S ~•:eeks in Burlington)
8. Bicen~.e nial Toux of kiistoric Raleigh, N. C.
9. Fishi~:y Rodeo (1975 and 76)
lD. Field Day (countywide)
11. ...Burlir_gtoz City Park, Burlington, N. C.
2. Christmas Celebration
a. "An Old Orar_ge Christmas" - 1975 •
b. Santa Lard
c. Visit b Sar_ta Clause to Schools and Hospitals
3. Youth Athle~ics
a. *Football
b. .*Basketball
c. *Baseball ~ _ _- .
• *The only charge is $3.50 for accident insurance eahich::'cavers a child
for twelve !12) months in.a11 activities. Other athletic fees axe
established b, existing athletic associations and/or teams for the
purchase of uniforms. - - -
4. Children's Craft Workshops- __:
a. h'oodcraft -.-....
• b. Paper 2-:ache' _ -
- c.. Leathzrcraft - --
d. Copper Craft •
e. Metal Er_ameling
f. Candlemaking
- ^. `r. ..
T'
5. Easter Ca'_~^==flan
a. Court, '.a-'d= Easter Egg fiun-t eta.
to schools and hospitals,
b. Visit b; whe Easter Bunny
6. Pumpkin ~a_ ~'s ap fox Hallocaeen; Four. (4} locations throughout
the County
ry. Chcerleading Clinic for Youth Athletics
II. Fourth of July C~lebratian -
a. Puppet S'_^_o:~s
b. Stilt :•+a? :~ ng Contest
c. Hoop Rollir_~ Contest
d. FIorses^aa Tournament
g. Tennis Tourna:_nts
10. Piano instruction
Cla ~ounty Rccrea'~.'.
ssification E:
a
e
b
e
v
l
Basx
Fee
a Na
an
Department
PaSks
aad
I' 1. Holiday Bas{etball 'Sournament .
1 2,
~, Tennis Tourr_at~en4s
$E:rilOx Cit'.Z~.^_S C?"cLit j~OrkShops -
I ~, Senior Citizens State Fair Excursions
} 5. Fourth of July Celebration
a. Bawling an the careen competition
3 b. Croquet Competition
c. Harses~!oe tournament - ti_
6. _..-.
Adu1,t Theatre Gxoup
•
Classification? F: Family Ei2tertai.nment to which no admission was charges.
1 rliranda and Friends I and II .(A Bicentennial Program`_wa.th emphasis on.
2 . the Black AZasical Culture of our Nation)t
2 two FIundred Rears of Dance In America (A Bicentennial -Program tracing
- . the danc°s ,'.nom the Ca].onial Period. of America to the..pxesQnt. )
3. The Bicentennial ~•lagan Train (A Bicentennial program__consisting of
of professiara'
tival
f
.
.
es
a parade by the national i~agon Train and a
local entertainment.)
j
~.
The RTarth Carolina Poultry Show (An er_ibition of prize poultxy from
all avex the Southeast.)
5. The Orange County Recreation and Parks Department kiarseshow.
$, = -
.,
G. Softball ~_- .:ss ::pia Tournaments
7. Basketball =..~ ,-°s cad ~'ournaments
Classzficatio: G:. ?_o;ected "Np Fee" Progxams fox the future:
1. Dxama Proc~uct~or3
2. Sdorkshops i^ Hrts and Crafts
3. 5cn5.or Citi.zzns Excuzsions
4. Clown T•~orks~ ops for Children
5. A Day -of Da }ca •
6. One-man sno:•s ~a~ 1oca1 artist
~. 7. An Antiques S:,o:a
8. A Black Heri4~~., sestival
9. A Photoara~ ~,` Club
10. A Hoxticult'a= ~ i•:ow {shop
1.1 . Creative Cocci n~ De.~,or_stratipns
~,
.~
~.....,
n=L?~s ~~~ ~~••^_•_L?riAY';?I ANU Pz•Lrrtts Dr~ART~lE~Ti'
71PPLZCATIG`1 PJR USr, l7y C„LITIT;N ~`~r'J~JR GRGL:3DS
REQUEST FCR LISw OF
(FACILITY/IKEA) (PORTId~i Or AREA/FACILI`S"C)
P~'QU'Si~D BY:
t•L~ILI:IG ACbitS.SS : TELEPHO~T
A~Tc.,r, REQITF.5L~?: b:C~I'I:I DAY XEAR HOURS
PURPOSE FD2 4,iiICH ?.c,0~7~..ST IS t•!~Ds:
TYPE PROGRAt•I TO B GI's
T CartiPy that I am authorized to act t:or the above-named organizatipn and
that said arganizatxoa will be responsible foz any and all damages done to the
p1aYt ar ec;u.ip~ent wh.,1e b=ing used by said, organzzation, and that the charges
as stated will 4:it?^_r*x youY agencies polica.es be paid.
~S~"G?~D I]ATE
TITLE GF Orr^FIC.E
I5' a.religicus oxga^ization, tha blinister, Priest. or Rabb„ must also sign.
APPROi'AL Cr i7Z:2=C'_":~_2 .
The above dues co not con~lict with any schedule yr planned Departmen'ta,l
progra..*1.
' DIRECTOR '
ApPRCV1L CF ADVTSGRX COL~TCIL C:iAIfL*lAtd
I anprvve above anpli.cation, subject to dates and times being apprpved
. CHAT&~iPIDT
RATE Ak•:OCIVT A[)E laAXtdENi .~]['I -. - -- - ~ -- __ -
DAm., kLCc^.IV.~: - _ _ .. :. _ ... -- .:'. . AtdOTJ[JT ....... ~., a t_ .._ _ .. -
_.
D PA1'Mc,N'I' RECEIVED -- _ - - -.. - _ ..
---
.. _
SPECIAL NOTE5: - .. _~--:. ......-~ ... -,~ ...
APPLICATIONS Zr.AX B.~ 03TA2t7;.'a FROM ANY RECREATION STAFF MEMBERS ,