HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda - 03-16-1999 - 8d
ORANGE COUNTY
BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
ACTION AGENDA ITEM ABSTRACT
Meeting Date:. Mazch 16, 1999
Action Agenda
Item No. .~ -d,.
SUBJECT: 1999 Orange County Legislative Agenda
DEPARTMENT: County Attorney
PUBLIC HEARING: (Y/1~
BUDGET AMENDMENT: (Y/1~
ATTACHMENT(S):
3/3/99 Resolutions Regarding
Legislative Matters
3/16/99 Resolutions
(to be provided by 3/16/99 under
sepazate cover)
INFORMATION CONTACT:
Geof Gledhill, 732-2196
TELEPHONE NUMBERS:
Hillsborough 732-8181
Chapel Hill 968-4501
Durham 688-7331
Mebane 336-227-2031
PURPOSE: To consider several resolutions that will amplify the Boazd's adopted legislative agenda for
consideration in the 1999 Session of the North Cazolina General Assembly.
BACKGROUND: At their regular meeting on Mazch 3, 1999, the Board of Commissioners adopted the
attached two resolutions regarding legislative matters. The first identifies those specific issues which the
Boazd of Commissioners requests be introduced in the General Assembly this year by the Orange County
legislative delegation. The second indicates the Board of Commissioners' support for various other
legislative matters that may be considered by the General Assembly this yeaz. The County Attorney has
transmitted the resolutions by cover letter to the members of the Orange County legislative delegation,
with an indication that a few refinements to the Boazd's legislative agenda will be forthcoming prior to the
March 24 General Assembly deadline for filing proposed local bills.
The County Attorney is working with several members of the Board on resolutions that would clarify the
Boazd's positions related to certain transportation initiatives and North Cazolina Department of
Transportation reform. Information related to these issues will be provided to the Board under sepazate
cover, and prior to the March 16 meeting.
FINANCIAL IMPACT: There is no direct financial impact related to the adoption of these resolutions,
although enactment by the General Assembly of some of the requested legislative measures would have
impacts, generally beneficial, on the County's revenues in future fiscal years.
RECOMMENDATION(S): The Manager recommends that the Board approve the resolutions
clarifying the Boazd's 1999 legislative agenda, and authorize the County Attorney to transmit these to the
Orange County legislative delegation.
2 ,'
NORTH CAROLINA
ORANGE COUNTY
RESOLUTION REGARDING
LEGISLATIVE MATTERS
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of
Orange County that the Board hereby requests the Senators and
Representatives representing Orange County to introduce and
support the following legislative matters:
1. AN ACT TO AUTHORIZE ORANGE COUNTY TO LEVY A TAX ON THE
IMPACT OF LAND DEVELOPMENT FOR THE PURPOSE OF GENERATING
REVENUES TO PAY PART OF THE COSTS OF SCHOOL CAPITAL FACILITIES
(Exhibit A to this Resolution);
2. AN ACT RELATING TO CLASSIFICATIONS UNDER THE ORANGE
COUNTY CIVIL RIGHTS ORDINANCE (Exhibit B to this Resolution);
3. AN ACT TO AUTHORIZE ORANGE COUNTY TO LEVY AN EXCISE
TAX ON INSTRUMENTS CONVEYING REAL PROPERTY IN ORANGE COUNTY
(Exhibit C to this Resolution);
4. AN ACT TO AUTHORIZE ORANGE COUNTY TO LEVY ONE-CENT
LOCAL SALES AND USE TAXES FOR PUBLIC CAPITAL FACILITIES (Exhibit
D to this Resolution);
5. AN ACT TO CLARIFY THE AUTHORITY OF ORANGE COUNTY TO
REGULATE THE USE, STORAGE, DISPOSAL, LABELING, OR APPLICATION OF
PESTICIDES !Exhibit E to this Resolution);
6. AN ACT TO AMEND THE AGRICULTURAL, HORTICULTURAL, AND
FOREST LAND PROPERTY TAX CLASSIFIATION TO INSURE THAT PROPERTY
3
TRANSFERRED FROM FARMER TO FARMER DOES NOT LOSE ITS ELIGIBILITY
FOR THE CLASSIFICATION (Exhibit F~to this Resolution);
7. AN ACT AMENDING NORTH CAROLINA GENERAL STATUTE § 122C-
251(h) (INVOLUNTARY COMMITMENT-TRANSPORTATION) TO PROVIDE THAT
THE COST AND EXPENSE OF TRANSPORTING A RESPONDENT IN AN
INVOLUNTARY COMMITMENT PROCEEDING TO OR FROM A 24-HOUR FACILITY
IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE COUNTY OF RESIDENCE OF THE
RESPONDENT (Exhibit G to this Resolution).
8. AN ACT AMENDING NORTH CAROLINA GENERAL STATUTE § 153a- ,
445 (MISCELLANEOUS POWERS FOUND IN CHAPTER 160A) TO AUTHORIZE
COUNTIES TO REGULATE BY ORDINANCE THE EMISSION OF POLLUTANTS OR
CONTAMINATES IN THE SAME MANNER AND TO THE SAME DEGREE AS CITIES
ARE SO AUTHORIZED AS PROVIDED IN N.C. GEN. STAT. § 160A-185
(Exhibit H to this Resolution).
Upon motion of Commissioner Jacobs, seconded by
Commissioner Halkiotis, the foregoing resolution was adopted
this the 3ra day of March, 1999.
I, Beverly A. Blythe, Clerk to the Board of Commissioners
for the County of Orange, North Carolina., DO HEREBY CERTIFY that
the foregoing is a true copy of so much of the proceedings of
said Board at a meeting held on March 3, 1999 as relates in any
way to the adoption of the foregoing and that said proceedings
are recorded in Minute Book No. ~ of the minutes of said
Board.
4
WITNESS Iriy hand and the seal of said County, this -~ITi day
of 1999. '
Clerk to t e Board of ommissioners
mydocuments/A2resreglegmatter.doc
5
NORTH CAROLINA
ORANGE COUNTY
RESOLUTION REGARDING
LEGISLATIVE MATTERS
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Commissioners of Orange
County that the Board hereby requests the Senators and
Representatives representing Orange County to support legislation
regarding the following matters:
(a) transportation initiatives that could require
legislative assistance, including funding for and planning for
rail stations in Orange County and planning for and funding for
more bicycle lanes on roads in Orange County;
(b) the creation of a legislative study committee
concerning .North Carolina Department of Transportation reform;
(c) legislation strengthening the State's spay and neuter
laws ( S_) ;
(d) reduce property taxes on homestead property, allow more
individuals to qualify for the homestead tax reduction and State
reimbursement to local governments for half of the revenue lost
due to the homestead tax reduction (H89).
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the Board of Commissioners of
Orange County that the Board hereby requests the Senators and
Representatives representing Orange County to support the North
Carolina Association of County Commissioners in its initiatives
for the passage of legislation covering the following items:
(a) provide an expanded menu of county revenue sources;.
6
(b) provide an increased State role in paying the costs of
Medicaid;
{c) restore growth and reimbursements for lost local
property tax revenue;
(d) provide State funding for increased school utility
costs;
(e) increase court fees to provide counties with revenue
for court facilities;
(f) increase Medicare reimbursements for EMS bills;
(g) prevent tax base erosion that would occur from property
tax exemption for nonprofit retirement facilities;
(h) streamline design and bidding processes for new school
construction;
(i) promote further annexation reform so that it is
designed to give people in the area being annexed more control
over the process and the result;
(j) create on-campus voting precincts;
(k) require utility providers to gain county approval for
utility route selections;
(1) promote campaign finance reform;
(m) increase accountability from charter schools;
(n) improve the legislation pertaining to school systems
seizing vehicles in a way that holds the school system required
to seize the vehicles financially harmless from this Statewide
requirement..
7
Upon motion of Commissioner Jacobs, seconded by Commissioner
Halkiotis, the foregoing resolution was adopted this the 3rd day
of March, 1999.
I, Beverly A. Blythe, Clerk to the Board of Commissioners
for the County of Orange, North Carolina, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that
the foregoing is a true copy of so much of the proceedings of
said Board at a meeting held on March 3, 1999 as relates in any
way to the adoption of the foregoing and that said proceedings
are recorded in Minute Book No. 2~ of the minutes of said
Board.
WITNESS my hand and the seal of said County, this ~ day
of 1999.
Clerk to th Board of Commissioners
mydocuments/resreglegmatter.doc
24
1 ORANGE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
2 RESOLUTION REGARDING LEGISLATIVE MATTERS
3 (Second Resolution presented by Commissioner Jacobs)
4 WHEREAS, reexamination of the role and structure of the North Carolina Department of Transportation has
5 been a major thrust of recent reform efforts led by the Governor, the North Carolina legislature, and the
6 North Carolina Secretary of Transportation; and
7
8 WHEREAS, while Orange County respects and accepts the traditional control of funds by the North
9 Carolina Department of Transportation, it is mindful that the current structure was established during the
10 Depression of the early 1930s, when counties went bankrupt and the state was primarily agrarian; and
11
12 WHEREAS, the pressures of increasing urbanization in some counties have outstripped North Carolina's
13 capacity to provide adequate roads and effective transportation alternatives in a timely fashion; and
14
15 WHEREAS, highway congestion is a major factor in air pollution, difficulty of travel, road rage, and
16 degradation of quality of life; and
17
18 WHEREAS, preservation of community character and environmental health are central to local government
19 efforts in Orange County; and
20
21 WHEREAS, it is necessary for both counties and the North Carolina Department of Transportation to
22 address transportation demands in a prompt, creative, flexible, democratic, and cost-effective manner in
23 order to maintain the quality of life enjoyed by our citizens.
24
25 NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved by the Board of Commissioners of Orange County that the Board
26 hereby requests the Senators and Representatives representing Orange County to support a study
27 commission on the relationship between county interests and the North Carolina Department of
28 Transportation with regard to:
29
30 1. promoting smooth and safe flow of traffic through setting speed limits, altering the
31 synchronization of traffic signals, permitting driveway access, and recommending the placement of traffic
32 signals and signage;
33 2. establishing means of promoting pedestrian travel, such as the installation of crosswalks;
34 3. encouraging a more flexible approach to highway design, particularly in subdivisions, and to
35 permit a variation from the "one size fits all" approach as contained in A Policy on Geometric Design of
36 Highways and Green Streets;
37 4. maintaining the highest possible safety standards but giving consideration in designing
38 facilities to factors such as the setting and character of an area, the needs of the users, the environment,
39 and the land-use planning goals of the community;
40 5. providing increased county participation in the design of transportation facilities, and with
41 respect to road projects, input on the type of road, its width, its design speed and whether bicycle and
42 pedestrian facilities are to be included;
43 6. identifying other transportation functions in which county govemment has a legitimate
44 interest that require a minimal additional expenditure of funds and do not compromise public safety.
45
25
1
2
3
5
6
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
ORANGE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
RESOLUTION REGARDING LEGISLATIVE MATTERS
(First Resolution by Chair Gordon)
WHEREAS, Orange County supports a multimodal approach to transportation which is sensitive to
community and environmental concerns; and
WHEREAS, in the past the State's transportation funding priority has primarily been roads rather than public
transportation systems and both need to be adequately funded to achieve a balanced transportation system
for this area; and
WHEREAS, the North Carolina Department of Transportation has adopted a multimodal approach to
transportation in our State; and
WHEREAS, Orange County is a member of and participates in the Durham-Chapel Hill-Carrboro
Metropolitan Planning Organization (DCHC MPO) and supports its multimodal approach and its emphasis
on more local and regional control of transportation.
NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved by the Board of Commissioners of Orange County that the Board
hereby urges the North Carolina Department of Transportation and requests the Senators and
Representatives representing Orange County to urge the North Carolina Department of Transportation (NC
DOT) to:
1. Place more emphasis on public transit, bikeways, sidewalks and other alternatives to roads
and relatively less emphasis on local and regional transportation systems, which rely on the single
passenger automobile so as to foster a more balanced approach to transportation needs;
a. take a broader approach to transportation and incorporate enhancement features
such as bike lanes and sidewalks in NC DOT road projects as a matter of course;
b. spend more money Statewide for bicycle and pedestrian enhancement features of
highway projects as part of highway projects and increase the money Statewide for these enhancements
beyond that made available through the Surtace Transportation Project Direct Apportionment funds of the
DCHC MPO;
c. program additional funds to be made available by the North Carolina Department of
Transportation for enhancements to Surface Transportation Projects to improve pedestrian safety;
d. eliminate the funding cap of $300,000 for individual bicycle projects to enable the
completion of larger bicycle projects in a timely manner.
2. Allow more local control for Orange County on transportation projects within Orange County,
including more participation in project selection and design, and similarly, more control by the DCHC MPO
for regional transportation projects;
a. encourage amore individualized approach to highway design and to permit a
variation from the "one size fits all" approach used by the North Carolina Department of Transportation as
contained in A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets (sometimes called the "Green Book");
b. maintain the highest possible safety standards but, in designing roads and other
transportation facilities, give consideration to other factors such as the setting and character of the area, the
needs of the users, the environment and the goals of the community;
c. provide for local government participation in the design of transportation facilities,
and, in particular, with respect to road projects, allow local input on the type of road, its width, its design
speed and whether bicycle and pedestrian facilities are to be included.
3. Provide more funding in Orange County for maintenance of roads, safety projects, and for
secondary road projects.