Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Agenda - 04-07-1999
Orange County Board of Commissioners Agenda Special Meeting 7:00 p.m. Wednesday, April 7, 1999 Chapel Hill Town Council Chambers Chapel Hill, NC Part I: Special Meeting of Orange County Board of Commissioners to Hear a Report on the Risks and Alternative Options Associated with Spent Fuel Storage at the Shearon Harris Nuclear Power Plant a. Purpose of Meeting b. Introduction of Elected Officials and Special Guests c. Presentation by Consultants - Dr. Gordon Thompson and David Lochbaum d. Commissioner Comments/Questions Part II: Meeting of Concerned Citizens and Interested Parties Regarding Spent Fuel Issues at the Shearon Harris Nuclear Power Plant a. Introduction of Moderator b. Introduction of Panel Members and Concerned Citizens c. .Citizen Comments/Questions and Answers (facilitated by Moderator) Alice M. Gordon, Chair Stephen H. Halkiotis, Vice Chair Margaret W. Brown Moses Carey, Jr. Barry Jacobs SPECIAL MEETING NOTICE ORANGE COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS .FOR WEDNESDAY, APRIL 7, 1999 Orange County Commissioners P. O. Box 8181 200 5 Cameron Street Hillsborough, NC 27278 ~= \rt The Orange County Board of Commissioners will hold a special meeting on Wednesday, April 7 at 7:00 p.m. in the Chapel Hill Town Chambers, Chapel Hill, North Carolina. The purpose of this meeting will be to hear a report from Dr. Gordon Thompson, nuclear consultant hired by Orange County, on the risks and alternative options associated with spent fuel storage at the Shearon Harris nuclear power plant. CP&L has filed an application with the Nuclear Regulatory Commission proposing an expansion of spent fuel rod storage capacity at the plant. Additional comments and information will be presented by David Lochbaum, a prominent nuclear safety engineer with the Union of Concerned Scientists. There will be an opportunity for citizens to ask questions. All Board of County Commissioners' meetings are open and the public is invited to attend. Alice M. Gordon, Chair Board of Commissioners 3/22/99 You Countln Orange County AREA CODE (919) 732-8181: 968-4501: 688-7331: 227-2031: FAX (919) 644-3004 Ext. 2130 MIST OF PANEL MEMBERS Joe Bowser, Durham Board of Commissioners 9 Druid Place Durham, NC 27707 Allen Spalt, Carrboro Board of Aldermen 300 James Street Carrboro, NC 27510 Richard Pratt, Orange County Commission for the Environment 28 Sedgewood Street Chapel Hill, NC 27514 Jim Warren NC WARN P.O. Box 61051 Durham, NC 27715-1051 Joe Capowski, Mayor Pro Tem Chapel Hill Town Council 404 Coolidge Street Chapel Hill, NC 27516 James Conner, Chair Durham City/County Environmental Affairs Board 311 E. Main Street Durham, NC 27701 Margaret Pollard, Member Chatham County Board of Commissioners 1817 Gade bryant Road Moncure, NC 27559 Steven Carr, Attorney CP&L P.O. Box 1551 Raleigh, NC 27602 Gerald Drake, M.D. President for Social Responsibility 210 Spring Lane-A Chapel Hill, NC 27514 Earle Fowler 1821 S. Lakeshore Drive Chapel Hill, NC 27514 U-®~ ~zv~i zWZ OU zOW ~U~ • ~~ C~ C~ V x ~~~! C~ .~ ~ ~ 4,~ .~ ~ V Q~ ~ U e. N ~_~~ A O W~/~ Y/ z O z o ~~iA V •i h ®~ `~ V 1 • `~ Q) i '~ ,„_, •.--~ ~: M ''~ y ~ ~ o ~' a~° ~ ~ ~-1- C~ stop O~Y/ r Z W ~ pUZ zO(W,,~~ ~Ut73 ~I ^ 1 1 1 d ~/ q~, ~/ ''~ r^ V 1 N 'd ' ^' t ~: C/~ '~ bA O ~ ~r O V y C~ ~ ~- ®Vf O~~ z~ OV z0~ ~U ^ ^ c'l~ ^ d- I a~ b~ ~ ~~ ~ C~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ n ~ ~ ~ ~ •~ v ~ •~ ~ ® r~ • '~ ~ ~ ~, ~ ~ n _~ ~ GI ~ N ~ ® ~ .' ~' ® ~ ® ~ ~ ~ ~ •~ .~ bA 4a ~ ~ CAS ~i O ~ "` ~ ~ -ad l!1 C~ ~ p" C ~ ~ G~ Cd ~ ~ .~ v ~ ~ "~ v ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ 4, ., ® . 4~ 4J ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - ~ vs ~ - ~ ~ - N ® ~ O O ~ ® ~ v ~ ® ~ ~ ~ ~ '~ 4 ~ ~ v ~ A Cct ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~, i•" ~ ~ GJ ~ ..~ ® ~ ~ "~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ,~ ~ a GA ~ ~ ~ --~ v ~ ~4 pw~ Z~ z W Z OV zpW ~U~ _: ;rt y_ ~. ^ ^ ^ 1 1 1 Ivy "~ N ®~ C~ 4~ ~ M M ~ M ~ ~ ~ O ~ a '~ ~ ~~ i A `J v N M M U~ ~ C'~ 4~ ~ ~ .~ ~j t C~ N N ' ~ t'V ~ n n O ® ~ O ~ H Q ~ P~1 ~~ N O 3 N ~4 a~ 0 O A; 3 as NI O H ®® ~9 O C~ C.~ C~ C~ C,~ •~ C~ cu b i ~, r~ ' i a~ 'zi . ~, U U e x .,.., V ~-l-1~ ~ ~ZV1 zWa= ~Ztu z ~® U O ~ Grp ZY_/ Z W ~ pUZ zp~ ~U~ Q, ~ s 'd ~ ~ ®® ~i LI • ~1 •~si .+..i v v ® ~~1 ~~ ® `~ ® `~ •~jmi O~ a~ b , ~^y ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ V ®-~ '~ •~ '~ /"°"\ ~ ~- e '~ v v .~,..i ® -~ `~ ~ ~iI 0 a~ b . r, .-. U~ U V-®~ O Z ~ zW~ o~~ z ° ~Ot~ i ~/ V U ''~ ^ V V . • G~ ^ ~ , .,..{ G~ O OwF Z t/~ zWE= OUZ zpW ~U~ n ~ ~ Pr( ~ q • ~ •~ ® • ~ '~ dr+~iJ ®~1 ® ~ ' ®' ~ ~ . • `~ •o •~ •~ V • V ~a.~ ® ~ V 0 a~ b .,~ U "~M s 3 V-®~ O Z _~ Z W OUP ~aW ~U O •,~ '~ O V U-®~ O Z ~ zWZ OU zOW ~U~ c1 ~ to m ~~ w~ m ° ~~ ~, ~~ ~ _ w ~ w ~~ ~ ,a ~ ~ ~~ Ft3 ~ ' Q ~¢ NN ~C] CC ~~ ~`''N {.i O 4 ~~ 1}} '' JI • et Sy '~5~ 6.1. t[S "C~ `~~ cry _ ~ ;~ r~~ ` ~ L L ~ '~ Hw. '~ ~ C 31. J ~ J v! T" ~ ~~ ~ i i~ i ~l ;. ? ~' 1' ,` ~ tl} • . I ~' q? N tCS ~}~ ~ ~ +-~ ~ ~ f - ~ '- ,~ :~. .. ~, .,. r .,~ '`~, ~~ r J 1a ~~ / (( X54 `' ti; ~y ~ " ~~ ~~ ~°a F^ J so ~s~,o ~~ n9 so~~ o~, a~ Q as c 0 m a c~ v a~ ~~ ~~~ ~~ z~ ~o~, Est 1~ lid sp9 c so '~s ~o~ ~ 0 so~~ ~ o~, ~ ~2gs a_ ~~~ z ~~z 0 ~`'s ~~ n~ s o~ so ~s~ o~,~ n~ so z '~o~, ~~ ~s s~~ 0 0 0 0 o a o ~~, o a ~ o o ~o~ r O ~ ~ 'tea' N ~S~ anoy gad n18 - aannod L1J t!} t+~ ~. J L"~. is ~~ ~h~ s K'i o` m m ,~ ~~~ ~~~ `, ~ ~ 'ti w'~~'~ ~• ~~ ti. w. ~ ~ i\ ~ \ t,, ~ ~~ ~ ~ h `~~ ~ ti ~ .sG ~ * ~ m ~ ~ ;-~ ~` ~A ~ ~~ y ~ ~. '~ ~~~ ~~~ `_ w v~ x c~c ,..., w a .~ ~. z ..~ a ~ a ~ J w O O V r..e F ~ ~ 9t y I I I ~ ax - C~ir .tee W ~ F O w J H ~- - ~ a _ c. z U z ~" A ~ ..., ~ -c 0 `~ a o m ~ ~ a ~ .°a ~~~ a :=~ H ~ `. ~ E- ~ o ~ ~ p .~ ~ see z v v E- ~- c~ oco~ oc°.a r~wE... c~tw ~ i,.. Hx~ _ E..~ U D -GT3' - - '- -!:7'~~ ..r •.r .,,, A rya r.r ~ . ~ 'IOOd ~ F a ~ F o c=. o `c~ ~. v ~ ..a ov a. ov w Q, ~. ,_„ - - -tom-~n crs '-~ .~ w m ~"~ -e w ~ ~ c:. p o •w Z ~ ^~ ,` ~+ ~~ ~ w -a c= w w z z ~ _ _~ c.. E- ~n .~ -.e wz. G. v REPORT HI-97t760 m~ a ~ W ~ ~m W ~ W ~ _ ~ ~ ~ ~ zx Esc ~~ I W r Q.r J ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 t ~ sr~ ' '~ is.~.' a.. s:~ V r•a r''4~ 1 A, •~ • . + 1 J.j ~v• d j: ,w ~J ~ i • 1 . ~ . . . ~_ ~, ° z °C ~~ ~W 2~ ~p ~~ {I7 :~ fJ ~1 ~~ f~~ V/ i ~J J I- LL' L~ Chairman Shirley A. Jackson Commissioner Nils J. Diaz Commissioner Greta J. Dicus Commissioner. Edward McGaffigan, Jr. Commissioner Jeffrey S. Merrifield United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001 SUBJECT: CURRENT EXAiN17PLE OF.RISK-DEFORMED REGULATION Dear Chairman and Commissioners: During the January 1 l~' Commission briefing on risk-informed regulation and during the January 20`~ briefing on the proposed reactor oversight process, I expressed our concern that the NRC and the nuclear industry are making risk decisions using incomplete and inaccurate data. As a current example, I call your attention to the license amendment application dated December 23, 1998, by the Carolina Power & Light Company involving spent fuel storage at the Harris Nuclear Power Plant and the subsequent proposed no significant hazards consideration determination (Federal Register: January 13, 1999, Vol. 64, No. 8) prepared by the NRC staff. The licensee and the NRC staff.have improperly downplayed the risk associated with the proposed activity. Their risk characterization is wrong. The licensee should be required to resubmit a corrected application and another Federal Register notice issued with a corrected proposed no significant hazards consideration determination. The error involves the determination made by the licensee and endorsed by the staff regarding the affect of the proposed activity, namely placing storage racks in Spent Fuel Pools `C' and `D' at the Harris plant, on the probability of a fuel handling accident. From the Federal Register notice: "The probability that any of the accidents in the above list [a spent fuel assembly drop in a spent fuel pool /loss of spent fuel pool cooling flow / a seismic event / misloaded fuel assembly] can occur is not significantly affected by the activity itself.... The probabilities of accidental fuel assembly drops or misloadings are primarily influenced by the methods used to lift and move these loads. The method of handling loads during normal plant operations is not signficantly changed, since the same equipment (i.e., Spent Fuel Handling Machine and tools) and procedures as those in current use in pools `A' and `B' will be used in pools `C' and `D.' Since the methods used to move loads during normal operations remain nearly the same as those used previously, there is no significant increase in the probability of an accident." Washington Office: 1616 P Street NW Suite 310 . Washington [)C 20036-1495 .202-332-0900 .FAX: 202-332-0905 Cambridge Headquarters: Two Brattle Square .Cambridge MA 02238-9105 .617-547-5552 . FAX: 617-864-9405 California Office: 2397 Shattuck Avenue Suite 203 .Berkeley CA 94704-1567 .510-843-1872 .FAX: 510-843-3785 January 22, 1999 Page 2 of 2 It is precisely this type of "smoke and mirrors"shenanigans that we decried during the briefings. The logic seems proper at face value, but it does not take much effort to show that it is wrong. In Enclosure 1 to the license amendment submittal, the licensee reported that the total storage capacity of pools `A' and `B' is 3,669 assemblies and that the proposed activity will add 4,715 storage locations in pools `C' and `D.' Thus, if the amendment is granted, CP&L will handle -pick up and move -about twice as many irradiated fuel assemblies as they will if the amendment is not granted. Consider for a moment the old game of Russian roulette using asix-chamber revolver loaded with a single bullet. CP&L and the NRC staff would apparently conclude that the probability of losing the game are not increased whether one or two turns are taken because, after all, the same method and the same equipment are used each turn. Their logic is simply wrong. The probability of a fuel handling accident at Harris will nearly double if the license amendment request is granted. This material fact contradicts the conclusion of the licensee and the staff that there will be "no significant increase in the probability," unless doubling the risk is not significant. Luckily, there's an opportunity to fix the mistake this time. Unfortunately, it's not the first, and probably won't be the last, time this mistake is made. The NRC staff made this same mistake in April 1998 when it allowed the Paducah facility to continue operating with its risk doubled. We have no intention at this time of formally intervening in this Harris licensing action. We trust that the NRC staff will take the necessary steps to have the licensee fix the fundamental flaw in the licensing amendment request before granting it. Sincerely, Q ti ~~ ~ ~ ~~~ David A. Loch aum Nuclear Safety Engineer UCS Concerns about Harris Spent Fuel Pool Plans Increased Probability of Fuel Handling Accident In the middle paragraph on page 3 of Enclosure 2 to Serial: HNP-98-188,."IOCFR50.92 Evaluation Significant Hazards Consideration," CP&L stated: Since the methods used to move loads during normal operation remain nearly the same as those used previously, there is no significant increase in the probability of an accident [spent fuel assembly drop in a Spent Fuel Pool]. On page 1 of Enclosure 1 to Serial: HNP-98-188, "Basis for Change Request", CP&L stated: Following this proposed change, Spent Fuel Pool capacities will be as follows: Pool PWR S aces BWR S aces Total `A' 360 363 723 - `B' 768 2178 2946 `C' 927 2763 3690 `D' 1025 0 1025 Total 3080 5304 8384 Under the current configuration at the Harris Nuclear Plant, there is storage capacity for a total of 3669 irradiated fuel assemblies (723 in Pool A and 2946 in Pool B). CP&L proposes to increase that capacity by 228 percent. There will be significantly more irradiated fuel assembly movements if Pools C and D are activated than would otherwise be encountered at the Harris Nuclear Plant. While the probability of a fuel handling accident during any individual movement is not significantly affected,-the overall probability of a fuel handling accident is at least doubled. By way of analogy, if the odds of being killed in an aircraft crash are defined as X, than a person taking 8384 flights will be exposed to a significantly greater risk of dying in an aircraft accident than a person taking only 3669 flights. Therefore, CP&L was wrong when it claimed that the proposed activity involved "...no significant increase in the probability of an accident [spent fuel assembly drop in a Spent Fuel Pool]." ,04/05/99 Page 1 UCS Concerns about Harris Spent Fuel Pool Plans Incompletely Analysed Consequences of Previously Evaluated Accidents In the second paragraph on page 5-3 of Enclosure 7 to Serial: HNP-98-188, "Licensing Report for Expanding Storage Capacity in Harris Spent Fuel Pools `C' and' `D' (Non-Proprietary Version)," Holtec reported: Consequently, all of the decay heat generated in the C and D pools is considered to be removed by the forced flow of SFP cooling water circulating through a heat exchanger, which transfers heat to the CCW system. On page 9.1.3-6 of the Harris Nuclear Plant's Final Safety Analysis Report (FSAR) (Section 9.1.3.3, "Safety Evaluation for the Fuel Pool Cooling and Cleanup System," Amend. No. 48), CP&L stated: If a total loss of offsite power should occur, the operator has the option of transferring~the [fuel pool cooling] pumps to the emergency power source. In other words, the fuel pool cooling pumps are powered from the plant's normal electrical supplies, but they can be re-aligned to be supplied from emergency power sources (e.g., the diesel generators). In the middle paragaph on page 4 of Enclosure 2 to Serial: IINP-98-188, "IOCFR50.92 Evaluation Significant Hazards Consideration," CP&L stated: Loss of spent fuel pool cooling at Harris is mitigated in the usual manner by ensuring that a sufficient time lapse exists between the loss of forced cooling and uncovering fuel.... Evaluation of this accident usually includes determination of a time to boil, which in the case of pools `C' and `D' is in excess of 13 hours based in a consideration of end of plant life heat loads. The documentation submitted by CP&L in support of this license amendment request addressed the impact of the increased heat load from Pools C and D on the fuel pool cooling, component cooling water, and residual heat removal systems, but did not address the impact on the emergency power source. Per its licensing bases, the Harris Nuclear Plant must be able to handle a loss of offsite power (LOOP) and station blackout (SBO) without undue risk to the public. In the event of an extended loss of the normal potiver supply system, plant operators would have to transfer the fuel pool cooling pumps to be supplied from the emergency power source (i.e., the offite diesel generators). According to the time-to-boil information provided by CP&L, this transfer may be required within 13 hours after the loss of normal power supply. Yet, the analyses submitted by CP&L do not address whether the diesel generators have sufficient margin to handle this increased load. Therefore, CP&L failed to completely evaluated the potential consequences of the proposed activity on previously analyzed accidents. 04/05/99 Page 2 UCS Concerns about Harris Spent Fuel Pool Plans Creation of s New or Different Kind of Accident In the top paragraph on page 6 of Enclosure 2 to Serial: HNP-98-188, "lOCFR50.92 Evaluation Significant Hazards Consideration," CP&L stated: Due to the proposed activity, an accidental drop of a rack module during construction activity in the pool was considered as the only event which might represent a new or different kind of accident. On page 5-16 of Enclosure 7 to Serial: HNP-98-188, "Licensing Report for Expanding Storage Capacity in Harris Spent Fuel Pools `C' and `D' (Non-Proprietary Version)," Holtec reported that the bounding (maximum) decay heat load input from stored fuel in Spent Fuel Pools C & D is 15.63 Million Btu/hr. On page 2 of Enclosure 9 to Serial: HNP-98-188, "Unreviewed Safety Question Analysis," CP&L stated: The new thermal-hydraulic analysis was performed to evaluate to 1.0 Mbtu/hr heat load that would be added to Spent Fuei Pools `C' and `D' as a result of this activity. CP&L proposes to administratively control, via a new requirement in the Technical Specifications, the heat load in Pools C and D to 1.0 Mbtu/hr, or less than 6.4 percent of the maximum heat load that Holtec determined may reside in them. Item (f) on page 9.1.3-1 of the Harris FSAR (Section 9.1.3.1, Design Basis for the Fuel Pool Cooling and Cleanup System, Amend. No. 48), stated: Administrative controls are placed in the minimum cooling time before transfer of spent fuel to the pools to limit the fuel pool temperature to less than or equal to 137°F. Although similar to the administrative controls being proposed by CP&L on the heat load in Pools C and D, this FSAR condition will not directly apply. If it did, CP&L would not have had to propose the heat load limit be added to the Technical Specifications: The proposed activity creates the potential for a fuel unloading error that results in a combined heat load in Pools C and D greater than 1.0 Mbtu/hr. For example, a cask containing spent fuel shipped from Brunswick or Robinson could be unloaded and increase the total heat load in the pools to greater than 1.0 Mbtu/hr. If such an error were to occur, than the containment response during a postulated accident may be degraded as detailed in Enclosure 9. Therefore, CP&L failed to address the potential creation of a new or different accident through the proposed activity. 04/05/99 Page 3 UCS Concerns about Harris Spent Fuel Pool Plans Potential Conflict with NRC's Waste Confidence Decisions On page 1 of Enclosure 1 to Serial: I-INP-98-188, "Basis for Change Request," CP&L stated: CP&L has implemented a spent fuel shipping program because DOE spent fuel storage facilities are not available and are not expected to be available for the foreseeable future. In SECY-89-176 dated June 8, 1989, the NR.C staff recommended that the NRC Commissioners approve revisions to the Waste Confidence Decision that had been issued in August 1984. The NRC addressed the storage of spent fuel. at reactor sites in this decision. One of the recommendations made by the NRC staff was to change the estimated availability date for a federal repository for spent fuel from 2007-2009 to sometime in the first quarter of the 21S` century. In August 1990, the NRC Commissioners approved this change and issued the updated Waste Confidence Decision. Because the duration of CP&L's `foreseeable future' is not specified, it may conflict with the NRC's Waste Confidence Decision if it extends beyond the year 2025. CP&L's statement implies a lack of confidence in DOE's ability to make a spent fuel storage facility available. If this implication is valid, it would seem imprudent for CP&L to seek an ability to generate more spent fuel. 04/05/99 Page 4 Orange County Commissioners P. O. Box 8181 200 S Cameron Street Hillsborough, NC 27278 Alice M. Gordon, Chair Stephen K Halkiotis, Vice Chair Margaret W. Browzz Moses Carey, Jr. Barry Jacobs SPECIAL MEETING NOTICE ORANGE COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS ,FOR WEDNESDAY, APRIL 7, 1999 /o~ntY of \ ~ ®~~ ' *+ ~ ~~ t7 ~ c 52 ~a rn ~arrh ~aco~`~4 The Orange County Board of Commissioners will hold a special meeting on Wednesday, April 7 at 7:00 p.m. in the Chapel Hill Town Chambers, Chapel Hill, North Carolina. The purpose of this meeting will be to hear a report from Dr. Gordon Thompson, nuclear consultant hired by Orange County, on the risks and alternative options associated with spent fuel storage at the Shearon Harris nuclear power plant. CP&L has filed an application with the Nuclear Regulatory Commission proposing an expansion of spent fuel rod storage capacity at the plant. Additional comments and information will be presented by David Lochbaum, a prominent nuclear safety engineer with the Union of Concerned Scientists. There will be an opportunity for citizens to ask questions. All Board of County Commissioners' meetings are open and the public is invited to attend. Alice M. Gordon, Chair Board of Commissioners 3/22/99 You Count In Orange County AREA CODE (9l9) 732-8181: 968-4501: 688-7331: 227-2031: FAX (919) 644-3004 Ext. 2130 vl7rd,' - r~ ra ~y ~~. ~~~d°~ svG. ~- ~'C~ ~.n ~~: ~~ ~ 1~v ~p7{~ ~® 4p' VA Nlf'Y` ~-°~#~~~ ~, '~ ~'p CJt~a m•, ~m ~ ~t~p r 1°d~i~~~~d`~esatt~~~o- o mf~pit`~,y~~~'~~a rB~glp~ e ~ti ~~p,~;,~~ ~ ~ tip p ~~ ~ ~~'~/ r n ire. r9 ~ ~ e"A+~l~~~l(/flA ~~dUa p'~'~{tl~ggib~i "p' °N R+~•dl~~l~~ a ; , d~1 a ~9 4'~ ' w (~ °' d v ~r •t 1~' l::a.., v.,..,' (Ovp~~ ~,r ~y ! r'•' d47 ~~ .~~c Q4 ~ ~° ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ e~ ,~ ~ « b®~'© v~ w 11 ~~'•°~, ~~r _~~++ r"'" a rp p• $~ r n ~ ~7 H Baiol~B ,~pd~.. ~. n n 'srug~®~wr~s' '. ~ d.°'d"a!'i~eM .': 6& ~ ~ ` ® .y ~' ! 1~~ Py ~ V P R ~pilD ~6~ tl ~,P,(`ofarP ~}yam ,y~ .~ u ~. aW~ 0 0 p 1 ~r JJ'!f.7B~S i9 ~ ~ ry ~~~~~qq i1'A@~u~YDp ~. p Vy~w~Bb PAO~p ~•I e~ Is4 ~ ~~ Y tai" ~~ lr4II'~.~bdl '~~ v° ~ ~ N 'aa~~lYBVad9sgrp~g~p~ l ~ .~°'~,~,I a Y a i C al 0~ `'yilpu d" ~; ~ ~ 1 ®. a~"lr - FfJ~m ~ _. ° '~ ~ y. 7ky,ti~,^"°.,,,,~~ Y}yy"y,'p(,ljp(ypl > / PP f W.~ ,~( l~ ~J) ~~ rf'17 Y3Y •~~~7 ~ ~ \\ U ~ r ay .•ql~ ~ Ar, ~Er7.~P`• ~1~ r. ~.~ '^r I' ~. N....6d '° I~P ~ ~ W ~ .r°o .:. ~f ~ ~.~ yy ~ ~ ,'~{! l~'~'~' {k %„!,t -+..~,r~.,,,y,`°e'tiMf~ "'£.. ' • r-r~-i -;~ i ~ - ~ ~a~' ate 6 ~a~ NB ~' live ~d8 s i `ari~u. 3Sy£ l.n~ dlll ~~i t ~~ ~~~.° `'a"'~~`""~1.+',•~ 'at V ~ i 4. J p P ~ , ~ , -'' 1 ~` i - L p '~ ,i L~,~'' ~ d 9 „~ ' ~' O ~~ ~'C 1 ` w .~ ~~i ,p. / rr;'r~, m' ~iP, 1 ~ ~ ~ lYypa• °~ i~a~: J '. ~~p. ~ .'~ ~. l sd '~ geyti~a~ ~~ !!. l tl Q) ~ ~m ,q ~ tr1 ~Si, r~~~i ~ a t~, r~ a~ gi C~ l{, ~~ ~ ~ ~ 1 tdq; ~ r ~~~~~~~ ~~ ~ ;E~`~ ~ ,~~+,q~~ j If ~ ,t z~ ~~~~ ~ m ~ c a 0 ^'o a v c C O' ~ ~N i N O ~E ~ O a U y. m d g c w u v ~E o ~, Q `o n N N s m a ~ w 0 3 O tp a L ~E T a x m ~ m ?' ~I v ~ N °' $ .~ ~ o ~ ,x a ~ ~ v ~ Y N O O ~ ~ Q ~ •. i ?. C G „ O ~ ~ T E u a m ~ 'G N O. T W M N U v c u u m y y c m 3 'o m c ~ v d y 6 O y ~ O N Q '~ °; 3 m °u E ~t „z 4 ! /r`I r+{~ 4 *11iT:"rt Ydlf~ ,,~...,s.lic~•~tl~tt"k~~i 4 ~ .. L{~~,'t y 4 tr S ifRt Y!I ~. r~'„~ R T, 'I :l"Y ~ ~ l` ~ 4e ¢,~ !A ,,tp~ ~ yl t~r r !F ~ ~, iy ~I ~ ~ '.~' r `j ~'~V fX Y,.~j Y o, ~~t ,, , ., ~ ~ a .~ N fin! ~ ~ ~ '~ :~ o .~~~ fF.~ r r yr Q. / ! t ~ 7 iq ? b5 'L r I iy~. ~! f ~, ! t r }~ ! • ' r ~ ~.]ivC±.~Lr~It.r1.~.41;.':41.u .~ipS.vl4r:.. ~..+kl.'.tr~.n~~ .~a.., .., r y ! ~~r~r~ ..... N~../..rv.:.,++,.,...WY+Liiiwti:~.(ifilwi~4~i~~e ~'' a~r~}S~'N ~~ !~`1weS sy'Sr~! ty y ii r rn ,,~ 1 ,~ . f h 1' f! ~' ! 1 l,Ir~i s ':~ -~ ~~ /id~~ r rt i' ;.e ,. ;'~ , i ~ '•~' ~ ~ b ~~ ~;.•;,, o , ~, C ~t 'l~~' ~ ~. w~V ~~,~` ; t ~ ~~~~ 7~ ~ J ~~~~. 11r1~ ~ril ~: ~e ,,,,pp V ~ltl L".Y.'ePnR ,. lL.aA e m Orange County Board of Commissioners Public Information Forum Risks mid Alternative Options Associated wills Spent Fuel Storage at the S/:earon Harris Nuclear Power Plant April 7, 1999 ~' ~a ~, ~. Name: Telephone (home): ~C-~~-%~"~+'~'~.~(.~ ~' State: ~,~ ~~ ~~ ~~' Telephone (work): -., 1. Please state your question or comment concerning Carolina Power and Light Company's (CP&L) application to expand its existing capacity to store spent nuclear fuel in fuel pools at its Shearon Harris plant and/or Orange County's decision to "intervene" in this matter. Intervention is the formal process by which Orange County has asked the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) hold a public hearing on the CP&L proposal. .. .~-. 5 ~ `,,,< ....s. r q/ .fj-' //' ~ /t' ~•+'~l-........./' (.J \. _ a" .~ /4Y ~~`~... C'..T p ~y,~.+~.r ,a/~~:~~ C d~ f~ li'^~t~~~ ~ F~~'+ 4\/~~ ~y~ '~'~.... 4~. // ~~ . K (~ `.. ~.. ~f h " J .r'~a'~ ~^'~^ "~ ~~ ~ C'~t tiL / ~ i y P ~''"~'~~ ~1 4. ~ ~~~~,+yy t...,... a~`~„~ ~ `'p fi~ ~....,t.?'a ~,~ ~,/ ~. .~ r'f . ~~ ~t sir' p+ ~°''~! ~~29 ~ F/ ~+~~ F~a `~.J~'~~ f' ~~' i ,/Z .~.^' ~~ ~'~q.,~ ~~s :~~'`p~'~,°/~~}/' ~'"~^~.~~ ~ ~y"`~~~j ~"~...~ ^~Y is _~ s~ 2. If there are any risks or alternative options that are of particular interest or concern to you, or that you believe need further'nnalys~s, please-state them. (LTse reverse side if neceo explain) r ~~ ~ Y F B N' d' ~~.~ ~, \ ~ t ~,A I ~.jti y~_ ~,uPq~' f -:. it T~y~w._ r''(j ,yam sJ ~l c~ ~~~~ L ~ & ,_ ,t ~'~ /,f~~ E. .d7 ~ /~ III~~~/ppp y{ r 6 .{`J .1 ' ~ ~}~~ f/~~{~~.+/' ,y ~`` Y'~~'((/,;y _ `p(s ~ ~~# l~~~ ~ j f ~a ~~'~ ~~A~rF f l' ~ ~r ~ l~~ ~~• `4./ ~ ~ ~~'~ ~.r e ...r^~~ ,/''•~ lV 6 %,tY~r!'~~[S fF' f, M~ "~ ~ / ~ ~it~J Orange County Board of Commissioners Public Information Forum Risks ae:d Alternative Options Associated wit/: Spent Fuel Storage at flee Shearon Harris Nuclear Power Plant April 7, 1999 ((~~ ~r^~ Name: ~~ , I~. ~ ~d~ b ~ V\ ~ (home): h ~ ~~ ~ ~ l ~ ~ ~~ ~ ' .-~ +" ~ ~~ ~ one ~ e ep . ~^ c . Address: ~ +~ ~. ~. ~ //'''' 0 City: .,~ FA rw, °~"~ 'e' ~"l State: ~ ~' Telephone (work): _ ~ l~ `~ ~'~ ~ "°' ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1. Please state your question or comment concerning Carolina Power and Light Company's (CP&L) application to expand its existing capacity to store spent nuclear fuel in fuel pools at its Shearon Harris plant and/or Orange County's decision to "intervene" in this matter. Intervention is the formal process by which Orange County has asked the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) hold a public hearing on the CP&L proposal. ' '~ f% ar'Rd ~ Y ~ Vl `~A \ / f- e / -Or V~ G.M ~ ~J °+m'u~, j E (~ ~----° a ~ ~ ~ ,. ~, I ~ ,, ~ ~.- ~ ~- s t l ~, q F, ~~- / 1 ~~ ~ . s 1 . r ~ ~ ~~ 2. If there are any risks or alternative options that are of particular interest or concern to you, or that you believe need further analysis, please state them. (ITse reverse side if necessary to explain) Orange County Board of Commissioners Public Information Forum Risks m:d Alternative Options Associated with Spent Fuel Storage at the Sl:earon Harris Nuclear Power Plant Apri17, 1999 Name: Address: Telephone (home): ~ ~ City: State: Telephone (work): ~, '®' 1. Please state your question or comment concerning Carolina Power and Light Company's (CP&L) application to expand its existing capacity to store spent nuclear fuel in fuel pools at its Shearon Harris plant and/or Orange County's decision to "intervene" in this matter. Intervention is the formal process by which Orange County has asked the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) hold a public hearing on the CP&L proposal. ~~~~ .~~~~ ~~ ~~ ? 2. If there are any risks or alternative options that are of particular interest or concern to you, or that you believe need further analysis, please state them. (Use reverse side if necessary to explain) ~~ ~~ .~ a~ r ~- Orange County Board of Commissioners Public Information Forum Risks m:d Alters:alive Options Associated witle Spey:t FueC Storage at the Sl:earon Harris Nuclear Power Plant Apri17, 1999 Name: C `~ ~s a~11. ~,<~ ~ ~ `~ ~? , ~, ~ _ / Address: ..~~.~ ;~ ~-~~' ~ ~, .- _, ~%' :.`\ `~`~ .. ~ ~(' Telephone (home): < ~ ~~ ~ ~'~ }` ~ - ~ 3 "2 ~ --~ ~ ~ ~( ~ -~ City: ~.,'' ~~ ~ e:~i~<~ State: ~ ` (--< Telephone (work): ~ ~' 1. Please state your question or comment concerning Carolina Power and Light Company's (CP&L) application to expand its existing capacity to store spent nuclear fuel in fuel pools at its Shearon Harris plant and/or Orange County's decision to "intervene" in this matter. Intervention is the formal process by which Orange County has asked the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) hold a [public hearing( on~t+he CP`&L proposal. ~E.~~(-~ ~f~~"., ~'~'lG.`~ '~ !~ ' I V Gt 1G,s~US. . ~Yl~ I ~9t~G~~:~'~ '~:''it.~sf6 \S G'i.~ ~~ ~ --- M1 _ ,A ~ ~_ ..~ ~~ //'~77 p~ ^,~ ^ ~ t d ~f ~;,,~, t - \ ~f I I~l O V~~ t ~ Y t~`~ ~ ~ e'.fP~ ~J~-~4~€. -`~ tV\°,. P~, ~- v r"cr s :: ~ J~-~'d '~ ~"~ I ~ ~ p /~ U C.Gt ~ c, '~ h.s,.sv~,~t~.~,\I P ~ b ,r~ ~~r c~ F( ~.:~'~ G:.~ f~, ~ ~~ ~: \~ 6'( F- '1 vY ~J~/ham G(tlf~ V `l1Q' ~ ~tl ~ ~ ~ 1~I i ~d, ~,..)(7 ~ ~~ ~ C`~(.~ 1`.,[(,n~~~ Cn. ~PJ1 ~Ct~~ ~ _ V A ~' ''~ ~ ~~ ~`~~ ~ ~: ~ `:: tr,:i~ ~~~ ~ ~ rr.~ k: C' i "I ,7,~. ~~, ~ ~.. (,..~ E' ¢.~..''1.C ~~ ~•O t a~''+~c"`c~,' ~ .~ „~~`~ ~.~ ~"5, ~ ~~._ '~,;c~~_.t. ~~.:,}<.~1~...,`(~E'.e~+`~'`\~'7.~ff\ Y/`-'i ~'~~~c~,~Y"lt.~'~. ~ ~ g-~ G.~,G~~.t.,l~~~ ~ ~"1~,~ o'v~,i,~c",~ 2. If there are any risks or alternative options that are of particular interest or concern to you, or that you believe need further analysis, please state them. (Use reverse side if necessary to explain) --- Orange County Board of Commissioners Public Information Forum Risks arrd Alternative Options Associated witlr Spent Fuel Storage at the Sl:earon Harris Nuclear Power Plant Apri17, 1999 Name. ~~- ~ y~-- ~ -~ ~ ~ ~j 4 ~ ryar .~r~ ~ ~ ~ `` ~ Telephone (home): k F~ ~ ~~" < '~ ~ t ~ y` ~ ~'~ ~ ' 4` `` ~ ~ Address: . ~. , ~ ., ~ ~ ~ .~ e . City: ~'~ ' ','~'~•' ~. . ~ . . s: ~ Telephone (work): : ~ ~ ~ ~~ State: ~9 ~ ~{ , ~ .. ~ ~ 1 ~`. 1. Please state your question or comment concerning Carolina Power and Light Company's (CP&L) application to expand its existing capacity to store spent nuclear fuel in fuel pools at its Shearon Harris plant and/or Orange County's decision to "intervene" in this matter. Intervention is the formal process by which Orange County has asked the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) hold a public hearing on the CP&L proposal. ~- . 41~~"v~~.-C„! V ~ ~ ~V..J n~-~l.~l~.°~~ ~~ ~y `~ ~ ,~ ~.~'y"'ti i,~,3..,rF4drG~ 4.rQC ~f;~~,...nf~,,.,~.,,,,.. ~ ~"".y''•`"ga„~+,y,~' ~, "' ~ L . w.: @ :, 3 r, ~..~,~'. ~/ ~=~'~ ..L~ ..~'~: '~.~ l } L~.T~ "-":~ ' ~~ f. ' ~. `..... it ~~..~.-d_ 'r ~`'~`:~.. 4M, ~ '4~.Y;' . ~ a L~. ~ `Fl ~! ~4 4 ' t.... FL 4,i ~ ~~3 ~6 1~.~ '~~^r._'4.°' r1,"Y ~ `~j{ /-~ !may ~*'"~ ~:~ Y ' ...,< ~~q* ~ ~ 1 ~~74p ~ 'i ~,.F"~~~'~ ~~ 1~1 7 (} 6 `~°i \ ~ ~ .~„ L~ ~,,,,.~,:,,..-~., (~j :'l~ ~`'\~ ~, _1:;,.'~ `t, C Air . k L (~'rJ .1 r~ U `~. t~~' ~k~ ~~i 4 b~ t~ <~'»...a~ `4 ' ~' " ~J~ ~ '~~ ~.+„e ~..:~.'-.,,. ~~ b~~~. 4 6 (~ (.~~~:~ 4. t • ~y, `~; 4 t ~ t,~ ~.~.~~ ,,6~ ,.._ ~ ~ 2. If there are any risks or .alternative options that are of particular interest or concern to you, or that you believe need further analysis, please state them. (LTse reverse side if necessary to explain) -, ~ ~. ,.~ , ~; ~,. .~~ r, .., ,~ .:~.~ ~n r , 1. Orange County Board of Commissioners Public Information Forum Risks aisd Alternative Options Associated wit/l Spent Firel Storage at t/ie S/:earon Harris Nuclear Power Plant Apri17, 1999 ............_ ~, C a~ C 1. Please state your question or comment concerning Carolina Power and Light Company's (CP&L) application to expand its existing capacity to store spent nuclear fuel in fuel pools at its Shearon Barris plant and/or Orange County's decision to "intervene" in this matter. Intervention is the formal process by which Orange County has asked the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) hold a public hearing on the CP&L proposal. `~ ,~~C.~'~ ~ _. i~"~""~ ~ 2. If there are any risks or alternative options that are of particular interest or concern to you, or that you believe need further analysis, please state them. (Use reverse side if necessary to explain) City: State: ~ Telephone (work): Orange County Board of Commissioners Public Information Forum ' Risks a~:d A[ter~:ative Options Associated with Spey:t Fuel Storage at the Shearon Harris Nuclear Power Plarit April 7, 1999 /, Name: CL~4.~-~ ~~~c~~C~=~ Address: 3 / ~ /t-~ C~- ~~`~ ~~`, Telephone (home): ~3 3 ~ S~~O 73 ~ ,~ City: Ci~t~2~e-~ ~'~~ State: ~-' Telephone (work): ~ ~a ~ - 3 3 ~3 ~ A ~ ~ 1. Please state your question or comment concerning Carolina Power and Light Company's (CP&L) application to expand its existing capacity to store spent nuclear fuel in fuel pools at its Shearon. Harris plant and/or Orange County's decision to "intervene" in this matter. Intervention is the formal process by which Orange County has asked the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) hold a public hearing on the CP&L proposal. 2. If there are any risks or alternative options that are of particular interest or concern to you, or that you believe need further analysis, please state them. (IJse reverse sid//e if necessary toe~xp`lain) ~/ '~ b ~`-~ `~~ ./4..[,S ~ 8-l~l~tz~~ ~~ y[-~° G(~iG~.Pi%L~t-P ~% gym, il~h.~/ s- __ I ~~~c..~-~ ~,~ ~~~t.-cry ,~, S~ ~n-~~G~ /~c.,g~..e G/'/,~~'-~ `~ ~~~`-P.~.'4.-~y-z--- ¢~ ~~3 Orange County Board of Commissioners Public Information Forum Risks m:d Alter~:ative Options Associated with Spent Fuel Storage at tl:e S/eearon Harris Nr~clear Power Plant Apri17, 1999 Name: i ~~'s c ' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ e): h h l ~ T ~ ~ ....- ~° ~ l'~ [ f i ~ ~r~ ~~ ~' Address: ~ ~ ~ ~"~ ~~~rN om one ( e ep t / N ~ r5 l.7 Y~~°~ k ` . AA ~~ ~fl ~~ ~ ~9 ~µ '. ~ ~~ x ~t ~'y yy ~ '~~ A ~° City: ~.~°~ '"- ~ ): Telephone (wor State: ~~ N u ,' ~, Y ~ 1. Please state your question or comment concerning Carolina Power and Light Company's (CP&L) application to expand its existing capacity to store spent nuclear fuel in fuel pools at its Shearon Harris plant and/or Orange County's decision to "intervene" in this matter. Intervention is the formal process by which Orange County has asked the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) hold a public hearing on the CP&L proposal. /~.~ pg,~'B ._. C.p t+' .--- .. r ~ , ,~ ~~9 c 'f •~~ ~~ r. :.- . r ~~ ,_ ~'` .r,o ..~~ ,~ _ , ,.~ ~ ~, q ~~~ 2. If there are any risks or alternative options that are of particular interest or concern to you, or that you believe need further analysis, please state them. (Use reverse side if necessary to explain) '" Orange County Board of Commissioners Public Information Forum Risks m:d Alter~:ative Options Associated with Spent Fuel Storage at tl:e Sl:earon Harris Nuclear Power Plant April 7, 1999 ° ~ r-w ~ ~ ~ ~ ' ~.... Name: ~"'~ `n n. n F ~ ~ ~ ~ c. c ~ ~; i V `` ` ~:=; Address:.. } ~ l l e ~ . t 6 w~ ~ _ 1 Telephone (home): ; ~ r• ~ ....,~`~ , F r, ~. c.~~f (~~ ~ .w ~~(~P~~:.._ ~"„~ `~SCJ ~ ,~ ~ ^ ~-~ t;, City ~ ~ C, `~`~ ~ elephon (work) T e State ~'~~ t `.'~ ; ~t~ ',; R .."'1 ~r (~"" a~~~' . _ . .., ~ ~' 1. Please state your question or comment concerning Carolina Power and Light Company's (CP&L) application to expand its existing capacity to store spent nuclear fuel in fuel pools at its Shearon Harris plant and/or Orange County's decision to "intervene" in this matter. Intervention is the formal process by which Orange County has asked the Nuclear Regulatory Co issi the CP&L proposal. _.._ _, 1 ., _ t. _ ` '~ Y s _. _ ~ 4 }¢ ° ~ ~~i ~~ ~~ \(`~. ~C"~f~`~ t' ~. , /"7~~ k i/ ~f'i..'Fly. At9_s" < s ~ 1i~ S l~iil,~ i~'S ,rr~.~ ~e ~ iI r ~: E ~I`ik' :;> w, •. ;~ a ~~t~~.~ St h' ,.. r,. f'i l:.hr ~i•v~~;~ ~,,~ , '~-', f~_4~;~~~~t\"~~., rl~_i;,,~ ~7 f %.4, c,.` `" i.a ~s.~" ~ t'~ ~~ ~i'~r.+ .~~ `i t~.~'t f.7 .. ry .:~ ~ h °~ Pt.~..~Li ~~.lt" ,~ l~,l,.ti ~... ~.~_~i..1~s ~ :~8_~ 6~i°~ ~., ` .. ",, t1 1l1' K .~,`'1 G's > '„'; $ f` i? ~, ~. ~ .7.. d r~~ f ~'S FE.c "`1 C~J ~ ~;~ t ~.'~" ~. tr__. 14..UU > _..:,. .(d~l~....~~.'~..f.4~•1C; t. 1 h '/'..I'.(`...~.::F 1°"` {~,te !it f'':t .~°i i a !'"~ 4_: K~~ ~~ 2. H there are any risks or alternative options that are of particular interest or concern to you, or that you believe need further analysis, please state them. (ITse reverse side if necessary to explain) Orange County Board of Commissioners Public Information Forum Risks and Alternative Options Associated with Spey:t Fuel Storage at flee Shearon Harris Nuclear Power Plant Apri17, 1999 Name: Address: Telephone (home): ~ ~ City: State: Telephone (work): ~ ~ 1. Please state your question or comment concerning Carolina Power and Light Company's (CP&L) application to expand its existing capacity to store spent nuclear fuel in fuel pools at its Shearon Harris plant and/or Orange County's. decision to "intervene" in this matter. Intervention is the formal .process by which Orange County has asked the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) hold a public hearing on the CP&L proposal. i c ~ ~ ~ _ ' ~4-- ~ i~.~.-~,~,-- ~~~~,t - - ~~,,~ ~ s ~s .~-~ U~..~~ ~~ s~ ~r-~ 2. If there are any risks or alternative options that are of particular interest or concern to you, or that you believe need further analysis, please state them. (ITse reverse side if necessary to explain) Orange County Board of Commissioners Public Information Forum Risks a~:d ACter~:ative Options Associated with Spent Fuel Storage at the S/iearon Harris Nuclear Power Plant April 7, 1999 Name: _ Address: City: _ Telephone (home): State: Telephone (work): ~' 1. Please state your question or comment concerning Carolina Power and Light Company's (CP&L) application to expand its existing capacity to store spent nuclear fuel in fuel pools at its Shearon Barris plant and/or Orange County's decision to "intervene" in this matter. Intervention is the formal process by which Orange County has asked the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) hold a public hearing on the CP&L proposal. -~ ~ ~~ 2. If there are any risks or alternative options that are of particular interest or concern to you, or that you believe need further analysis, please state them. (Use reverse side if necessary to explain) ~( How to Help AlC W,~l RN is committe~f to cots vir~cing CPB~-L to ~~opt ~ s~f Y sto~~ge plan fog High-L~v~l nu~le~r waste, with your suppot~t, w~ can ~f o it,~ MEDIA Let television, radio and newspapers know this issue is important to you. "short letters to the editor or brief calls to TV and radio stations are very' effective. (Contact information on reverse.) ELECTEp OFFICIALS Your calls and emails were instrumental in convincing nine local governments to pass resolutions in favor of an open process-similar messages must be sent to encourage resolutions against the expansion. Help get this issue on the agenda with short messages that emphasize the importance of this proposal. (Contact information on reverse. ) 10IN NC WARN AND VOLVNTEER YOVR TIME There are many important ways to volunteer, including helping with mailings to get the word out, designing flyers, posting notices or making calls. Give us a call to let us how you would like to help. HELP WITH OUTREACH Urge your civic, community or religious organization or business to inform themselves about CP&L's plan and to consider endorsing our resolution against the expansion. Arrange for NC WARN to make a presentation, or give one yourself, about the risks of CP&L's plan and the safer alternatives. CONTRIBUTE TO NC WARN'S HIGH-LEVEL WASTE FUND NC WARN needs funds to publicize the scientists' findings and generate materials to challenge CP&L. Please help us offset CP&L's public relations machine with atax-deductible financial contribution. CPL his ~ who% teem oflobbyists ~n~f PR specialists working on e%tec~ o~ci~ls ~~7~ the me~i~ ~c~-oss the ~-egioh. Your suppo~-t will help b~l~nce the soles in {~vo~ ofopenness ~n~ safety. Toyethe~ we c t convince CPc~rL to ~%pt s~f ~ stogy-age ~lte~°n~tives PO Box 61051, Durham, NC 27715-1051 (919) 490-0747 * NC-WARN@POBOX.COM ~~Intact Inf®r~.ti®n Look in the phonebook or an the web for additional contact information. News a er Phone Fax News & Observer 829-4500 829-4529 Associated Press 833-8687 834-1078 Durham Herald-Sun 419-6500 419-6837 Cha 1 Hill Herald 967-6581 918-1055 Cha 1Hill News 967-7045 968-4953 Greensboro N&Record 336-373-7000 336-373-7382 Inde ndent Weekl 286-1972 286-4274 Chatham Record 542-3013 663-4042 C News 460-2600 460-6034 Television Phone Fag WLJNC-TV 4 549-7000 549-7043 WRAL-TV 5 821-8600 821-8541 WTVD-T'V 11 687-2212 685-4373 NBC TV 17 836-1717 936-1687 WB TV 22 790-9535 878-3877 WRAZ-TV 50 $21-8555 821-8541 Radio Phone Fax/Email NC Network News Radio 890-6111 890-6192 WUNC Public Radio 966-5454 962-4327 WXDU Duke Radio 684-8870 684-3260 WNCU NCCU Radio 560-9628 530-7975 WXYC UNC Radio 962-7768 c unc.edu WRAL-FM 101.5 Radio 890-6146 890-6101 WRDU 106.1 Radio 860-1061 954-8561 Oldies 100.7 Radio 860-1007 876-8578 WDCG 105.1 Radio 860-1051 954-8561 Chatham County Durham County Orange County Wake County PO Box 87 200 E Main St PO Box 8181 PO Box 550 Pittsboro, NC 27312 Durham, NC 27701 Hillsborough, 27278 Raleigh, NC 27602 Fax:919-542-8272 Fax:919-560-0020 Fax: 919-644-3004 Fax:919-856-5699 Rick Givens, Chair Mary Ann Black, Chair Alice Gordon, Chair Vernon Malone, Chair Oh es48 otmail.com mablack co.durhamnc.u ordonam " ds .com vmalone co.wake.nc.us Gary Phillips William Bell Stephen Halkiotis, V-Chair Betty Lou Ward, V Chair a~el em'i.net wvbell co.durham.nc.us Steve a ath.net bwar co.wake.nc.us Carl Outz Joe Bowser Margaret W. Brown Yvonne Brannon 'wbowser co.durham.nc.us mwbrown .com brannon co.wake.nc.us Uva Holland Becky Heron Moses Carey Linda Coleman uvah(a~emii.net bmheron co.durhamnc.us mcare bellsouth.net Lcoleman co.wake.nc.us Margaret B. Pollard Ellen Reckhow Barry Jacobs Herb Council m ollardna,em"i.net ewreckhow(c~co.durham.nc.us b'acobs ,totals orts.net hcouncil(a,co.wake.nc.us Betty Mangum Commissioners maybe bemangum@co.wake.nc.us reached at the addresses Michael Weeks and hone numbers above. maweeks@co.wake.nc.us Town/Cit Address Phone Carrboro 301 W. Main Street, 27510 942-5541 Cha 1 Hill 306 N. Columbia Street, 27514 968-2845 Hillsborou 101 East Oran e, 27278 732-2104 Mebane 106 E. Washin on, 27302 563-5901 Pittsboro 635 East Street, 27312 542-4621 A x 362-7300 C PO Box 8005, 27512 469-4000 Garner 900 7 Ave, 27529 772-4688 Kni tdale 217-2200 Morrisville 469-1426 Ralei PO Box 590, 27602 890-3070 Durham 101 Ci Hall Plaza 560-4396 Waste Awareness and Reduction Network PO Box 61051 Durham, NC 27715-1051 PO Box 61051 Durham, NC 27715-1051 Phone: (919)490-0747 Fax: (919)493-6614 Email: NC-WARN@POBOX.COM For Immediate Release March 25, 1999 Waste Awareness and Reduction Network Contact: Jim Warren 919-490-0747 r e ® it ra uclear sate x an~i®n Study Shows ~-ccidents Could Surpass Chernobyl's Devastation DURHAM, NC Citing new information by two top nuclear industry experts about the potential for catastrophic accidents, NC WARN today called on Carolina Power & Light to withdraw its proposal to double its storage pools for "spent" fuel rods at the Harris nuclear plant. WARN called on CP&L to pursue the proven method of dry cask storage at its other three generating reactors instead of amassing the High-Level waste in central North Carolina, noting that the marginal additional costs to the company are far outweighed by the potential devastation of a severe accident at Shearon Harris. At a news conference today, the group announced a new campaign to urge elected governments and other organizations throughout the region to inform themselves on the issue and to take a stand, pointing out that nuclear safety cuts across all political and social boundaries. Since publicizing CP&L's plan in late October, NC WARN has focused on ensuring that all safety issues regarding the proposal are identified and aired in an open process. But today, the Durham-based environmental organization indicated it has completed its analysis of CP&L's proposal, and stated that it is undeniable that severe accidents axe possible and that CP&L should take every available measure to decrease current risks at the Harris facility -not increase them. NC WARN released a comprehensive technical report prepared for Orange County by Dr. Gordon Thompson, an internationally-known nuclear safety expert. Another top industry expert, David Lochbaum of the Union of Concerned Scientists, is also providing technical analysis for WARN and the local governments; Lochbaum backs Thompson's findings. Thompson's detailed analysis concludes that a number of severe accident scenarios are credible, and that accidents at ot~e or more of the Harris spent fuel pools could lead to offsite radiation exposure an order of magnitude [10 times] larger than the exposure from the Chernobyl accident. He and Lochbaum both caution that activation of pools C and D at Hams would significantly increase both the probability and consequences of such accidents. The Thompson report describes how CP&L's plan would pack the highly irradiated used fuel rods very densely into the new pools, a situation which, combined with even partial loss of cooling water, could result in a spontaneous fire or asteam-zirconium reaction. Such an accident could release enough Cesium-137 - a powerful gamma emitter - to contaminate an area larger than the entire state of North Carolina to radiation levels which the Nuclear Regulatory Commission assumes will require evacuation of all rural areas. over ~ Joining NC WARN at the news conference were two area scientists with long histories in nuclear issues, who discussed their analyses of CP&L's plan and the technical report by Dr. Thompson. David Martin is a retired professor from NC State University with a specialty in nuclear reactor physics and nuclear safety studies. Gerald Drake, M.D. has worked on radioactive waste issues for decades as a member of Physicians For Social Responsibility. Professor Martin stated, "Because of the possible penalties of mistakes and accidents, you simply have to take the safest direction. I agree with Thompson and Lochbaum that the alternative of dry cask storage at the generating reactors is simply safer... We're living with a very risky situation ... everything has to keep going just right in order to avoid serious problems." The NRC admits that there are fewer failure modes with dry cask storage. That means there is far less chance of catastrophe than with high-density pool storage. A study performed for the NRC in 1997 also concluded that major accidents are plausible with pool storage of spent fuel rods and that consequences range to the truly catastrophic. Dr. Drake added that Physicians for Social Responsibility, an international organization, has long advocated that spent fuel is much too dangerous to be transported until it has cooled for at least 50 years. Another serious concern about the CP&L plan is its proposal to alter the original design of the new pools, which called for separate cooling and electrical systems, by trying to hook the new pools up to the cooling and electrical systems for the two existing pools. This also has serious implications for the safety of the reactor operation -especially in the event of a power outage - since the systems are interconnected. CP&L's plan has become highly controversial, especially after the company reneged on promises to openly address all safety issues after the technical consultants were retained; also because the company has since moved to block a public hearing sought by Orange County. But today, NC WARN said it is hopeful that, seeing the concern from the regional public and the clear warning from top scientists in the nuclear field, CP&L will reconsider this project and err on the side of safety. The group produced rough estimates of how much extra it would cost CP&L to revert to the dry cask option at its other reactors in the Carolinas. Based on limited information in the company's license application, and CP&L statements that dry cask storage would cost "about five times more" than its current proposal, NC WARN estimates that it would cost CP&L about $31 million extra over a 15 year period. WARN board member Mazk Mazcoplos stated, "That's less than 10% of CP&L's net income for 1998 alone ... We're calling on CP&L to show its corporate citizenship by exhibiting a reasonable degree of prudence and caution, especially with such a very small amount of money ... this is a pittance to this big corporation." WARN delivered to CP&L a new Resolution for Nuclear Safety and said it will now launch a campaign to seek endorsements from all types of organizations and institutions, large and small, by calling on them to inform themselves and take a stand on this issue which so clearly affects every living being in central North Cazolina. WARN board member Carol Childs stated: "We agree with Thompson, Lochbaum, Martin .and Drake: the potential for truly horrible consequences clearly outweighs any unsupported argument of low probability - especially when the only benefit is a small additional profit for CP&L. Make no mistake ... this is an additional and substantial risk that can and must be avoided." Thompson and Lochbaum will be in Chapel Hill on April 7`~ for a public meeting to discuss their findings. The meeting will be held at 7pm at the Chapel Hill Town Hall on Airport Road. ### Health and Economic Consequences of Accidents from High-Level Nuclear 1R/aste Storage The following is a summary of key points from a 1997 study performed for the U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission by the Brookhaven National Laboratory (BNL). The study describes various types of serious accidents that can occur in High-Level nuclear waste storage pools. - The largest accidents considered in the BNL study could kill approximately 100 people immediately, cause 140,000 cancer deaths, contaminate over 1.5 million acres of farmland so badly that it could never be decontaminated, and cause over 500 billion in property damage not including costs of health damage. - Even a much smaller accident involving leaks from only 700 to 1,700 fuel assemblies could cause nearly 20,000 cancer deaths, cause $25 billion in property damage off-site from the plant while permanently contaminating up to 16,000 acres of farmland. CP&L proposes a total of over 8,000 fuel assemblies at Shearon Harris. - Of the 8 most. severe accidents studied by BNL, 4 would exceed $50 billion in off-site property damage, 3 would exceed $100 billion, and 2 would exceed $200 billion with a maximum of $566 billion of off-site property damages. - Four of these accidents could force the abandonment of 100,000 acres of farmland or more, with a maximum of 1.7 million acres that would be too radioactive to ever clean up; 4 accidents would also exceed 25,000 cancer deaths, 3 of which could exceed 50,000 deaths. - By comparison, a severe meltdown of a nuclear unit considerably larger than Shearon Harris would be expected to cause 88 to 160 quick deaths, 35,000 to 110,000 cancer- deaths and the loss of 1.3 million acres of farmland, according to a 1995 study also conducted by Brookhaven National Laboratory. While that study did not estimate economic damages from a meltdown, the largest numbers we know of range from $200 billion to over $300 billion - or about half as much as the most serious spent fuel accident that BNL reported in the 1997 study. - Over the 27 years CP&L proposes to operate the expanded waste pools, the probability of the most severe accident according to BNL would be about 1 in 18,000, which is 12 times higher than previous NRC estimates for a severe spent fuel accident. Chernobyl had an estimated i in 10,000 chance of an accident by comparison. - BNL estimates the probability of an accident causing nearly 20,000 cancer deaths and $25 billion in property damage has a cumulative probability of about i in 125. - The BNL study did not consider worst case accidents. CP&L's plans would have more than 3 times as much waste fuel in storage as considered by BNL. '°The industry does not have sufficient dafa to support the c/aim that a spent fuel accident is unlike/y to occur. They try to dismiss these very severe consequences with the unsubstantiated claim that the event is not like/y to occur," --David Lochbaum, Union of Concerned Scientists, Washington, DC Author of Nuclear Waste Disposal Crisis WasteAwarenessandReductlanNeiwork PO Box 61051, Durham, NC 27715-1051 Jan 1999 ~ ,~ 919-490-0747, Fax: 493-6614 NC-WARN@POBOX.COM Is Safety Too Expensive? Additional Cost of a Safer Storage Option 31 million Extra cost for dry storage at generating reactors, vs. Harris pool expansion* CP&L's Net Income, 1998 ..................................................................................................................... . . st'rnates o~ ±~osts fiver 1 ~ ~e~rs Dry Storage at Generating Reactors Pool Expansion at Harris Additional Cost $73 million -~42 million $31 million ................................................................................................... . o Pocket Change for Ct~L CP&L's 1998 Gross Revenue 3.1 Billion . CP&L's 1998 Net Income 339 Allillion It Simply Isn't Worth the Risk! *Please see accompanying NC WARN cost assumptions. aa~ rrrrnrurr THE TWENTY-SIXTH LEArLET i AfVY QllESYIONS? IV :MEMORY OF THE WHITE ROSE STUDENT RESISTANCE MOVEMENT AGAINST HITLER'S SOCIALISM THE ARTICLE III FOUNDATION (919) 774-1904 LL~I`][ON ON NUCLEAR SAFETY IN CENTI~;AL NC A I~~SO We request the earnest consideration of the fo11'owing mformation which is o£nrave concern re~ardrng public health throughout central North Caro/rna. 'nations and institutions small and lame to inform themselves and to We urge orgam consider adoption of this or a similar- resolution. ® Whereas, Carolina Power & Light (CP&L) seeks a federal license aunendm 1 naoand a Ic~rrlits the Plant would becomee storage at the Shearon Hams nuclear plant in central North Car , the nation's largest approved storage site for highly irradiated used nuclear fuel rods or High-Level waste (HLW) . ® Whereas, Used nuclear fuel is one of tl7e deadliest materials on earth ands ~~ storage of HLW in cooling plools clan out of our environment for 10,000 years, and whereas problem lead to meltdowns, fires and other accidents causing radiation releases into the atmosphere. ~ Whereas, Nuclear generating and waste storage facilities rely on high~y~ shutdowns of the Ham seactor dunngta six- technical and human error, as evidenced by the 3 acclden week period ending mid-March 1999. ® Whereas, Even file Nuclear Regulatory Commission (N12C) - an agency with ~ eloolnaccidents~ higher than ~ d t11e uidustly -acknowledged in a 1997 study that the probabrhty of HL p reviously believed and could result in tens of thousands of can` eofone s e of sev0ere accident ~ 1 pin 125. P and where NRC information indicates the cumulative probablh y ® Whereas, },avv ,-~;~~~ Twn of 1hr civnrlrl'e tin nn~•lPar cafvty nsrrinrtc (_nr~tnn Thmm~cnn and llat~irl T nrht~~nn~ yt100"XOgOdc~N?IT~M~NI.~"l~ 6I99-~'tib ~.~ ~YLO-06~'til6 auoyd t~'OI 5'1LLg ,~N `~y~'Q 15'Dt9 XOff Od (~jrom7aN uoganpag a8 ssauaremy~ arses NX-6`~l~l ON of umlar aseatd ~ Whereas, CP&L has rejected numerous requests to just7ly its proposal to the public or to address safe identified by'I,llompson and Lochbaum, and adcl;tionally, CP&L has even moved le ~ ~oneerns public hearing sought by Orange County to air Borne of these issues with the NRC. gaily to prevent a ® Whereas, The current evacuation plan for the Harris facility was controversial when first develo ed i not been updated to account for the tremendous P n 19$6, and leas thus cannot assure the safe removal of residents unrl this region has experienced since that time, and g potential accidents. ~ Whereas, Communities near Harris -and the greater region -already bear an undeniable and si if the existing reactor and waste storage, handling and transport systems, and whereas thegen Icant risk from to accommodate waste from Cl'&L's reactors in other areas. xPansion is sought ® Whereas, Dry cask storage at the generating reactors is a safer storage option, as acknowled ed b Lochbaum, and is even deemed by the NRC to be less prone to failure than coolie Yoj h°mpson and CP&L states that dry casks are equally safe as pool storage and Yhat its expansion is based o and whereas n cost savmgs. ® Whereas, Dry storage at the generating reactors would cast CP&L only an estima period, which is a small fraction of CP&L's net profit of X339 million for 1998 aloneo o~eve a 15 year public relations, image advertisiYlg, and lobbying of elected officials (totaling many millions n Its budget for ® each year). Whereas, All citizens at risk of exposure to radiation from accidental releases have the democratic ri genuine voice in such an important matter. And whereas CPL, by refusing and/or blockin get to have a its plan to local governments, has chosen an adversarial stance toward the public, des ite g fforts to justify local governments, citizen organization NC WARN, editorial boards from various re 'o members of the public nearest the facility and throughout the re ' P the calls from nine open examination of the safety issues surrounding its pro osal. g1 nal media, and glon encouraging Cp&L to engage in an P ® Therefore, We hereby resolve to call on CP&L to meet its responsibilities as a corporate citizen b 1) Withdrawing its application to license waste pools C and D for e an y xp ded storage at flee Harris plant. 2) Immediately begin to phase-out the import of HLW to Harris so as to rninirrnize a ' on the public by storage in high-densi ~ P ddltional risks placed generating reactors. ty Pools and to revert to the safer o lion of dry-cask storage at the .. or Business Date DRAFT PUBLIC STATEMENT CONCERNING ORANGE COUNTY'S PUBLIC INFORMATION FORUM ON APRIL 7 CP&L has declined an invitation to participate in the forum. We understand that the purpose of the meeting will be a presentation of a report prepared by Orange County's consultant, published last month. The report, according to the Chair of the Orange County Commission, serves as the "technical basis for the County's contentions" in the intervention effort the County has undertaken to oppose CP&L's spent fuel storage plan. The "intervention effort," as the County describes it, is a lawsuit. On Monday evening, April 5th, the County's lawyers filed eight contentions they have asked the Nuclear Regulatory Commission and a licensing board panel to hear "to challenge the adequacy of the application submitted" by CP&L in support of the storage plan. Orange County has asked the NRC licensing board to admit these contentions "for litigation in this proceeding." We have not had any meaningful opportunity to review the contentions filed last evening, but CP&L will respond to the contentions in a filing with the licensing board on or before May 5. Because the information forum will likely address the County's legal contentions, it is not appropriate for CP&L to participate until we have had time to review the filings and respond to the legal and technical issues raised by the filings, in accordance with the schedule set by the licensing board. If the County's ultimate objective is to gather information, to learn more about the storage plan, and to confirm our judgment that the plan is a safe and responsible proposal, a lawsuit is unnecessary and wasteful of all of the parties' resources. We hope to continue a responsible dialogue with the leadership of the County to respond to questions about the plan and to find a resolution to issues that currently divide us. Orange County Board of Commissioners Public Information Forum Risks ar~d Alternative Options Associated with Spent Fuel Storage at t/:e Sliearan Harris Nuclear Power Plant Apri17, 1999 Name: -., Address: Telephone (home): ~ ~ City: State: Telephone (work): ~ ~ 1. Please state your question or comment concerning Carolina Power and Light Company's (CP&L) application to expand its existing capacity to store spent nuclear fuel in fuel pools at its Shearon Harris plant and/or Orange County's decision to "intervene" in this matter. Intervention is the formal process by which Orange County has asked the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) hold a public hearing on the CP&L proposal. 2. If there are any risks or alternative options that are of particular interest or concern to you, or that you believe need further analysis, please state them. (Use reverse side if necessary to explain) Summary of Orange County's Efforts Concerning the Proposed Expansion of Spent Nuclear Fuel Rod Storage Capacity at the Shearon Harris Nuclear Power Plant Letter to Local Governments In January 1999, the Chair of the Orange County Board of Commissioners wrote to all of the local governments lying within the 50-mile radius nucleaz accident impact area, on behalf of the Orange County Board of Commissioners (BOCC) to: 1) advise each board concerning Carolina Power & Light's (CP&L) proposal and permit application to expand its storage capacity for high level nucleaz waste (spent fuel rods) at its Sheazon Harris nucleaz power plant; 2) describe the process used by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) to evaluate and permit the proposed nuclear waste storage expansion; 3) outline Orange County's plan to open the CP&L proposal and the NRC's evaluation and permitting process to public input and scrutiny; and 4) solicit each board's support anal participation in the effort to inform the general public as to the CP&L proposal _and the NRC permitting process. Orange County's Petition to "Intervene" (Request a Public Hearing) ~ .._ .:.. _ . ~ ~ . At its meeting of January 19, 1999, the BOCC approved funding for technical sand legal consultixig services to evaluate the safety issues associated with CP&L's proposal. to increase its spent nuclear fuel storage capacity at the Harris plant and to advise the County on legal issues related to the permitting of that proposal. Orange County then retained the services of.a technical expert in nuclear power generation issues, Dr. Gordon Thompson of the Institute of Resource. anal Security Studies, and a legal expert in nuclear regulatory process, Diane Curran of Harmon, Curran; Spielberg and Eisenberg. The County attempted to integrate these consultants into a public information and evaluation process in cooperation with CP&L but was not able to get CP&L to . agree: Accordingly, after hearing presentations about the CP&L proposal from Dr: Thompson and CP&L representatives at the February 9, 1999 meeting of the BOCC, the Board directed its consultants to file the documents necessary to formally "intervene" in the NRC permitting process. The process of formally requesting public hearings on a permit application is known as "intervention". The intervention documents were filed on February 12, 1999. On March 1, 1999, GP&L filed a formal response to the County's petition to intervene, contending that Orange County should not be accorded standing and requesting that the NRC deny the County's request for public hearings on the permitting issues. On March 3~, Dr. Thompson provided the County Commissioners with his full written report, entitled "Risks and Alternative Options Associated with Spent Fuel Storage at the Shearon Hams Nucleaz Power Plant". This report was created to provide an outline of the technical basis for the County's contentions in the intervention effort. The full text of the Thompson report, as well as Orange County's initial intervention filing and CP&L's formal response, are available from Orange County on request. . Pre-hearin~Conference In response to filings by Orange County and CP&L, the NR.C has appointed an administrative hearing board to evaluate Orange County's petition to intervene. The NRC's administrative hearing board has ordered that a pre-hearing conference be convened to determine if Orange County meets the criteria (primarily related to legal standing and legitimacy of technical contentions) that are required to qualify it to initiate an intervention. If the administrative hearing board determines that the County has met the standing and contention criteria, it will set a date and location for public hearings. The pre-hearing conference has been tentatively scheduled for two days during the week of May 10, 1999. Orange County has petitioned the NRC to hold the pre-hearing conference as a noticed public meeting ~in Orange County. Public Information Forum At 7:00 PM on April 7`~, 1999, in the Council Chambers at the Chapel Hill Town Hall, Orange.. County will be hosting a public forum to inform the public about Gordon,Thompson's findings and report relative to Shearon Harris fuel storage expansion. safety issues, concerns and alternatives. In addition to Dr. Thompson's presentation, David Lochbaum, a noted nuclear safety engineer representing the Union of Concerned Scientists, will be on hand. to discuss the fuel storage expansion issue. Elected officials and members of the public who attend will have the opportunity... to address questions to Gordon Thompson and David Lochbaum. 4 r-'-i o• a Q• O ~3 >__-.. ~aa.~~a~~ a~ y~d~ti~~~~~roU~, aoa~ro~ro ~ .=E a F O ec u ~~'a' 3a~'°~,gaoaro.c~~m.Soy ~bdu~~ do ,.~°yy°~cd~~o~oU~°~.~uo~y~c~w~~`~~~a~aFi'°= F FFaua.a. Fo o a~ _ ~.a.~~~~a~gw°c~0'~~'~u~jO''''~T~°to.aa~i S~ °o" ~~°o~'ti u,~d~'ro. +,epaa~'ti~o, ca1~ ~•"-. ° °0a ~ w a~ Cl~•~~ oro o ~Ub °m~~tioao~~~o~~QOa'~a°roo a y `~°~~~:°~n ^~o roNOwc,.9or~oA,??~S~~p~t'~~o~~~a,'~,''''Uy~yor~nd' N ~a~„~~' .nom ~po~>aa. ~~o~N~o~~ a ° ~a ro ~~, ~ ~ro ~x a 'S a ~ ~~ F o, ~ a a~ '" ro o N~u~~p~°a~r.~ ~°' a aa~° ~, ~, 'a as •~ro o~ u '3ro ~ ~~ °o ~, ~~,~.~~ ydOy k ~ ~.~ 'C~1.~H0 ~ ~ ~OOd ~a ' +'d O O ~ro a ~,~ N m Ow+'~3 ~ O• O O~.r'Oa O° O O, °ro~ ~ NO 0 a~ ro~~~,a o.~ °`~lbE ro~ ~ ~~ u ~. a aU o nu~y,~' m w~ o ~a°°~; ~ ~ ~~ a, ~ , a~o°. '~~~,relrop~'^'~w~'F~tw~a~'o°ayuy~ro~o~ '~~~'~' *'+~aicC~~~actl Gp~hp~,aU ObA~'c~.,,~~1~' v,a~a ua~~~ ua.a~~0~,°o?~aoa~F,~~~ ~~ ° N'~~ aFi~ ~.~ o ~~,ro N 0, aui v u o °p,W.nOw o ~~oa~o u~y~5ao~~~,~o~v,roa~~..aa~ ~~~U~ u~y 3 '~~ wF. ~ ~ ~. ~ a~~ a ~ a°i oV °.~~ o'~F nn a a x •° ° ~ ~ o .a .~ .~ o .~ a ~ . ° ~ ~ Fawaa~ m ~ c~ o°aa~~a~m °'~o°~ '°'~a~'3maoa°°.c~. a da~~. ~`~'~~~F°:~tR"uua°~° ia:~Ubpu~aoi40.~ .~ ~ D C1 cC O u .G u ro ro ro a. z o'd oF~~~D~ FO•N•a.Ua^"u ~agma,~ ~~' ~d~ ~cdo~~v,~a~Wo~~~e~p~.~a°~i~~ec~ ~w~ ~au~.a.~u~c a :ate o~W ua ~y~~V1Fy W .N' OOOOdN~. ro4"~O W ~ cd OO+iOOO~~ ro' BOO ro ~+ 41 - +~.~~.i~i~o'~ S", ~+'~',.~~Oa~q,+'~ - daO"`-0ti "~.+°ro~"~' W~.ti+~ tti O q r/1ViOAw O, ~'+~Oro '.~.r.S' ' ro't'' ' OC1AOOl o +~ +~cro aaroac~p„aro~g~ o'~cro o ~.~ma~ F~o~~~a yw~''•q ~ d dt Cctl.~aaa~~y ~.~oro•~ a~ ~O~''`T-i"~Oy>rou .oyw p,,nA •~oaO~,~., aO..,~ga cC OTJyoO day. .~~ ~~ O1 i i U ay y mi,±~F ~ ,~. o Fo°o,~o woa, ~u°c+ s! u q v~y pia a F~ C = d C "' ,~~- ho'J'~o o++ a~O a fd y ~ y ~ ~...ro.~ ~, ~,~Z.a a O•Liuro'~ ~•v, •^' ~yo" RS ~' O aU' ~ O a ° W ov° ad 0 ?~ 'n-C,,,, °caU~..~v, o ay~,a Fro .au~yauFro uv,3.gaoom op °°~ ~ .u''o~ .~ ~~~~° a"„° ro a v- ro ~ ro n~ N „ o u ~~ a ro a ~ F o +~ +~ O i o d C ~~oa aa.~v,~ "~w a~omop• ~v,oaMa~Y.~o ao~~mpa ~oo~NO ow °pI3,~ v°,v,oa~'~°`tl~ ..O h~ N a ~'W'~FO~o°Og+~~a°o~ ~°'q~. ° •0~ o"3b'°.~u, .a°Naai o~ F o 3• ou °uo U° aa,° ~'mmaao ~ s p q ~~ "d~t~a~ F.~ro~~O o~G° ~~ro~~aooa~a~~wm. >~~ aa~o.~a~ .U~y~~ Fy ~~ st o~o„a a L7~. ice- d O. ~O OFC~~:~°bA Ot0 OA~,'+~,F o°a O~tll O mN yu'Oy C1O F o a a~O~r.+b0~~ o.~,, ttl~p v L7 3~ ~.-~ O ~ ,~ N~ w '~? .a O m ti .G m ., .~ O~ d ~ O 0 Ili m "" o ~, a v N 3 w ~LL FuaF~o~aoFroa~ y,o a+~o3~cocs^'o~Ma;~~ Fro o>. u~ro~ un„ .~ ro ° m•°a• .a ac~'°ya~;o F ° F3 0 0 Boa F °nn~'U '~ amp' o~ U oa ~~ ~ p i i 5¢ °po0yaU ., u, 'afro ~ ~ u~ a .o o aw ~ oa a o o.a m.N ~. o ca a ~~ cza~~~a' ~O~~owv~.~U~'OOJ~' abo~~,• nnaxa~~& 'un.°r~a~roa~~~~. ,~~; o~ppa~ci ;xyHo~~oaa~v, off' y o. oa~taa~ymbn•~uo ro '"fro goo roF~c~y+~rocaF°~ ~a"c~pa~iv,0o~~y~~~~~t7~o .,a.a~m~~na~;°~~'a p,Ci N i y.T. 0.1 Q+~..+yFy~ ~~?, >TJ,.~~'c~a•+A b~au`"rooo~F ,~•-'y,OC7o U aap,wOa ~ o .aOi.,0OU~~ 07°.x,,0, a~RiO~q~ o,= s.o °. o o.., ° dv~om mc.~ °~°0 O3•.,aF a~a v~ ~ m~ ~a'"•av 3~a°O'~m Ua""+ ~'L~`. p ro x Fw V ~i O O F. o a ~" h ~ o ;~ o ~ ~ ~,~ a a° F ~.~ ~~~w~ aUro °.a,° a ~~ ~, ° °o o roA d~~x~ ~'c~w~ ~,~ ~"'~ p,A~.a•~F~ °',~ nn a~ urow ~ ~ o a~, y V'^~ i ro roW~.OrO dtl)rgO cc 'pa °OOy~ FpD•ti°a ,gR07 FO a U O N ~ O N ~ a~Fm d OD,A CJ o p a~~o ~ yblo.a~ ~'N~ao „y„goo a„oF~ ooc°w y°o w'ti •°.,.> vi o.~ wmpF~' +~ w d~ ~o~ i 3w a°a,a~~ roU~na~,aa o~en° „~w~a of w° o .a °'~ ~ ~~o c:wa c ~~~n'~ogron°+~'.~mnn .= c oa. o~ Uoo°o'~aooH~ ~oa~~~s~~'ro~°'~'" ~'~oa~~~o~o~,;roa.~~o~ ~ ati~ ~aFi~a~i.~~ba~i. roa .aFFF a .a .a c,o•~.a Fn,of~>ocso s.~a1~~c~G° .a ~ :ay~wyu a~ro o.~~g~a~°F~'.~G~~twoaa~.~o~,~~~ I~ CVV Ew .~UyFU.av1 O.Z. u.au°~~ .°~OO'xi a~~U~ so3.~.~A~w~rn.c~~.Qti ~ro~~R. .8 ~oy~mao°o"~cuW~ooy~o s. C'J u a.~ n n. ~ ~ O .q ,a O O m n w a d .i ~v -' w