HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes - 19750916ss
Commissioner Gustaveson moved that the meeting adjourn.
`~.\~1~~
Flora R. Garrett, Chairman
Agatha Johnson, Acting Clerk
MINUTES
ORANGE COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
September 16, 1975.
The Orange County Board of 'Commissioners met on.Tuesday, September
16, 1975, at 7:30 p.m., in the Commissioners' Room of the Courthouse in
Hillsborough, N. C.
Members present were: Commissioners Flora Garrett, Jan Pinney,
Norman Walker, Norman Gustaveson and Richard E. Whitted.
Members absent: None.
Others present were S. M. Gattis, County Administrator, Neal Evans,
Fiscal Officer; A. B. Coleman, Jr., County Attorney; and Betty June Hayes.
Clerk.
Chairman Garrett referred to Item # 1 on the Agenda: (Recognition of
persons present and not on this agenda desiring to speak with the B.oard).
Commissioner Walker suggested that the Board move the meeting to the
Superior Courtoom due to the fact '.so many persons could not get into the
Commissioners' Room. Chairman Garrett stated that there were certain Items
on the Agenda that should be heard prior to Item # 13.
Upon motion of Commissioner Walker, seconded by Commissioner Finney,
it was moved that the meeting be moved to the Superior Courtroom so that
all citizens present could participate in the open meeting and that cer-
tain items be moved up on the Agenda so that they could be heard.
Chairman Garrett called for the vote on the motion.
All members of the Board voted aye.
Chairman Garrett referred to Item #5 on the Agenda: (Resolution
approving Cane Creek Fire District -- Mr. Edward Johnson, President,
Orange Grove volunteer Fire Company is present to answer questions con-
cerning the proposal of the fire company).
Mr. Johnson presented the following resolution:
"BE IT RESOLVED that Orange County Board of Commissioner on September
16, 1975, at a regularly scheduled meeting, unanimously approved map
and boundary description which follows: Such boundary description
and map are for Cane Creek Fire District, an area served by the Orange
Grove Volunteer Fire Company of Orange County and wholly included
within the boundaries of Orange Grove Fire District (established by
election held May 7, 1974).
Beginning at point (1) on Buckhorn Road (1114), 1.7 miles _
north of its intersection with SR 1125; thense southeasterly to
point (2) on'SR 1125,1,7 miles northeast of its intersection with
Buckhorn Road (1114); thence easterly to point (3) on SR 1126, 1.4
miles northwest of its intersection with SR 1D06; thence southeasterly
to point (4) on SR 1006, 0.2 mile northeast of its intersection SR
1128; thence southerly to point (5) on SR 1128, 0.2 mile southeast of
its intersection with SR 1006;
Thence southeasterly to point (6) at the intersection of SR
1127 and SR 1128, excluding property on SR 1128 between this and
the preceding point; thence southeasterly to point (7) on SR 1115,
1.4 miles east o£ its intersection with 5R 1102; thence southeasterly
to point (8) on SR 1113, 0.4 mile northeast of its intersection with
~b
Dairyland Road (1177); thence southerly to point (9) on SR 1113,
0.4 mile southeast of its intersection with SR 1177; thence south-
westerly to point (10) on SR 1102, 1.8 miles southwest of its inter-
section with Dairyland Road (1177), thence southwesterly to point
(11) on U. S. 54, 0.3 mile southeast of its intersection with Orange
Grove Road (1006); thence northwesterly along N. C. 54 to point (12)
0.3 mile northwest of its intersection with Orange Grove Road (1006);
thence northwesterly to paint (13) on SR 1100, 0.6 mile southwest of
its intersection w. h SR 1101; thence northeasterly to point (14) on
SR 1100, 0.6 mile northwest of its intersection wtih 5R 1101; thence
northerly to point (15) on SR 1116 0.2 mile south of its intersection
- with SR 1115, thence northwesterly to point (16) on SR 1115 0.2 mile
west of its intersection with SR 1116, thence northeasterly to point
(17) on SR 1117 0.4 mile north of its intersection with SR 1115;
thence northerly wtih SR 1117 to a point (18) 0.5 mile south of its
intersection with SR 1118, excluding property on SF. 1117 between
this and the preceding point, thence with SR 1117 northeasterly to
a point (19) D.5 mile northeast of its intersection with SR 1118 and
including property on both sides of SR 1117 between this and the
preceding point, thence northeasterly to the point of beginning."
Upon motion of Commissioner Whitted, seconded by Commissioner Pinney,
it was moved and adapted that the Resolution far Cane Creek Fire District
be approved.
'i'he Chairman referred to Item #7 on the Agenda: (Consideration of a
Memorandum of Understanding between the United States Soil Conservation
Service, the local Soil Conservation Service and Orange County.
Chairman Garrett stated that a Memorandum of Understanding had been
presented to the County far its approval. Chairman Garrett explained
the background of the Memorandum and Quentin Patterson of the ACS Service
reviewed the contents of the Memorandum.
Upon motion of Commissioner Pinney, seconded by Commissioner P7hitted,
it was moved and adopted that the Board approve the Memorandum.af Under-
standing.
(Far a copy of the lemorandum of Understanding see Docket Book 9,
Page 71 ).
The Board of Commissioners then moved the meeting to the Superior
Courtroom.
Chairman Garrett referred to Ttem # 12 an the Agenda: (Community
Development Proposal - to be presented by Mark Burnham.)
Dark Burnham of Triangle J Council of Government presented to the
Board a document entitled Application far Federal Assistance - Community
Development Plan Summary.
Mr. Burnham stated that the Counties of Wake, Durham,- Orange
would jointly receive #318,000.00 if the Application.was accepted and
that under the HL"D formula 560,420.00 would be Orange County's portion
of the Grant. Mr. Burnham began a review of the proposed Application
and he informed the Board that the Community Development Task Force was
being reactivated for the purpose of reviewing the Grant Application.
Discussion ensued. Commissioner Walker suggested that the Board
take no action on the Application until same could be reviewed by the
Task Force and their recommendations received by the Bvard.
_ Tt was pointed out that the Town of Hillsborough had made applica-
tion for the entire allocation of the Grant.
Commissioner Walker stated that it was his understanding that
Mayor Cates' proposal was to use the funds for water and sewer installa-
tions.
David Wagner requested permission to speak in behalf of the
Hillsborough request. Chairman Garrett granted Mr. Wagner permission
to address the Board. He stated that he was familiar with the plans of
Hillsborough and if anyone present could show that these monies could be
s~
used in a better way, than he and the citizens of the Fairview Community
would be more than willing to listen.
Further discussion ensued concerning the Community Development Pro-
posal and Mr. Burnham was authorized to procede with the completion of
said proposal.
Chairman Garrett referred to Stem #13 on the Agenda: (Resolution
concerning the Eno River Park - to be introduced by Commissioner Pinney).
Discussion ensued as to the procedure that should be followed for
the conducting of this portion of the meeting. Commissioner Gustaveson ---
suggested that debate and comments from the audience whoudl be limited
to 30 minutes.
Chairman Garrett inquired as to how the group felt about the matter
of establishing guidelines and procedures.
S. G. Barbour asked the Board to "plunge into the matter" and then
the audience could determine how they felt about the situation.
Commissioner Jan Pinney presented the following resolution:
"BE IT RESOLVED that since the State of North Carolina's
three (3) plans to develop the Eno River State Park does not
protect and preserve the Eno River Valley that the Orange County
Board of Commissioners are in opposition to the plans and we do'
hereby respectively request that should the State decide to pur-'
sue the proposed Eno River State Park that they give specific con-
sideration to the rights of the property owners along the Eno River.
THIS THE SIXTEENTH DAX OF SEPTEMBER, 1975."
Commissioner Pinney moved for the adoption of the presented Resolu-
tion. Commissioner Walker seconded the motion.
Discussion ensued.
Commissioner Pinney was requested to reread the Resolution.
Commissioner Gustaveson stated that he felt there were two issues
emerging and that efforts for all groups concerned to work together must
be made.
Further discussion ensued.
Commissioner Gustaveson offered a substitute motion to appoint a
five member Task Force that would spend the next three or four months
investigating how ,the area of the Eno should be preserved and that each
Board member would make one appointment to the Task Force.
Further discussion ensued.
Commissioner Gustaveson amended his substitute motion to read that
the Board would appoint a six member Task Force with each Commissioner
having one appointment to the Task Force and that the total Board would
appoint the Chairman of the Task Force and write the guidelines for the
TAsk Force and that these would be presented at the next Monday's meeting.
Commissioner Walker spoke in opposition to Commissioner Gustaveson's
motion.
Members of the Audience that spoke in opposition to the Eno State
Park were: Jim Yates, Gladys Loye, Terry Woods, Nell Andrews, 5. G. -
Barbour, Josephine Barbour, Gilbert Petty and other persons who did not
identify themselves.
Members of the Audience who spoke in favor of the Eno State Park
were: Donald Cox, Margaret Nygard, Dr. Holger Nygard, Duncan Herion
and other persons who did not identify themselves.
Dr. Harris spoke against the right of eminent domain that North
Carolina might e~~i~-e for the Park.
68
Chairman Garrett pointed out that by Resolution of the ~aafd, meetings
adjourned at 10:30 p.m. She inquired of each Board member if they
would agree to a 15 minute extension. It was agreed to extend the
meeting far 15 minutes.
Chaarman Garrett advised the group that the County Attorney was in
the process of preparing a statement and/or resolution for the Board to
consider.
Commissioner Gustaveson withdrew his substitute motion and his
amended motion. Commissioner Pinney withdrew his motion and Commis-
sioner Y7alker agreed to the withdrawal.
Commissioner Pinr_ey moved for the adoption of the following
resolution. Commissioner Walker seconded this motion.
The Chairman called for the vote.
Voting aye were Co~unissior_er Garrett, Gustaveson, Pinney and Whitted.
Voting nay was Commissioner walker.
The Chairman declared the motion passed.
"BE IT RESOLVED that since the State of North Carolina's three
plans presented to the Orange County Commissioners on August 12,
1975 to develop the Eno River State Park do not adequately protect
- and preserve the Eno River Valley that the Orange County Board of Cam-
missioners are in opposition to the said plans as presented and we do
request the State to give specific consideration to the rights of
property owners along the Eno River."
The Clerk was instructed to send a copy of the adapted Resolution
to Secretary James E. Harrington, Secretary of Natural and Economic
Resources.
Commissioner Gustaveson proposed that a six member Task Force be
appointed by the Board to work for the next four months to consider
various ways that the Eno Valley can be preserved and that each Commis-
sioner make one appointment to this Task Force and that the Board select
the Chairman of the Task Force and establish guidelines to be used for
the Task Force.
Commissioner Whitted seconded the motion.
Commissioner Walker spoke in opposition to the appeintment of the
Task Force and stated that he felt the majority of the group present
opposed any State Park on the Eno.
Chairman Garrett spoke in favor of Commissioner Gus±aveson's motion.
The Chairman Called for the vote.
Voting aye were Commissioner Garrett, Gustaveson, Pinney and Whitted.
Voting nay was Commissioner Walker.
The Board took a five minute recess.
Chairmar_ Garrett referred to Item # 9 on the Ager_da: (A resolution
memorializing the life and memory of r4rs. William Geer).
"IN 1958 ELIZABETH DANTZLER GEER became totally involved with
- the Ghapel Hill Communi*_y effort tc develop an outstanding public
library. She served first as Secretary of the Community Study
Committee for a Chapel Hill Public Library. Later, when the Library
became a reality, she was a volunteer worker, next a part time
Librarian, then a full time Librarian and finally Library Director.
During Tits. Geer's years of Service, the library grew from its
small quarters in a house behind the University Baptist Church to
its present facility, often called one of the most beautiful Library
buildings in our State. Registered readers increased from $,500 in
the early years to more that. 0,000 today. Bov:c circulation increased
from 75,000 volumes annually in the beginning to more than one
s9
quarter of a million volumes a year today.
The growth of this Library could not have been achieved. without
the guidance of a person as competent as Mrs. Geer. The community's
acceptance of its library could never have been attained without
the guiding hand of a warm, friendly, and sensitive leader such as
Mrs. Geer.
THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Commissioners of
Orange County acting in behalf of all the citizens of Orange
County expresses its deepest regrets over the untimely passing
of ELIZABETH DANTZLER DEER.
BE TT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a copy of this resolution be
signed and sealed by the Chairman and each Member of the
Board of Commissioners and a copy filed with the permanent
records of Orange County."
Commissioner Jan Pinney introduced the above mentioned Resolution, and
Commissioner Walker seconded the motion that the Resolution be adopted.
A11 members of the Board voted aye.
The Chairman referred to Item # 8 on the Agenda: (The State Depart-
ment of Transportation is ready to rpopose its Secondary Road Plan for
Fiscal Xeax 1975-1876 for Orange County.) They have requested the County
set a date for a public hearing on this proposal.
The Board agreed to schedule the proposed Read Public Hearinq for
Thursday, October 9, 1975, at 7:30 p.m., at the Courthouse.
The Chairman referred to Item #3 on the Agenda: (The New Hope Rural
Volunteer Fire Department has bey letter asked the Board of Commissioners
to request the State Department of Transportation to pave the drive lead-
ing from the State Road into the Fire Station).
Upon motion of Commissioner Pinny, seconded by Commissioner
Walker, it was moved and adopted that a letter be sent to Mr. Sam
Jones, District Engineer, informing him of the Board's action.
Chairman Garrett referred to Item #10 on the Agenda: (Report from
the County Attorney concerning the proposed transfer of the Northside
School property to Orange County.)
The County Attorney'stated that he had completed the title to the
Northside property and several tracts make up the Northside property.
However, several of the trant's descriptions are not adequately, there-
fore, he was not able to determine where one tract ends and another begins.
Apparently, there has been no dispute about the property since the Chapel
Hill Carrboro School System acquired the land.
Commissioner Walker inquired who owned the land before the School
System acquired it and wasn't the property given for educational purposes
only?
The County Attorney replied that a Mr. Stroud was the owner of a
nine acre tract and that the land was given to the school for educational
purposes and that this could create a problem, however, if the School
Board wants to convey the property, a survey would have to be made with
and without the Stroud property and the County Attorney will then make
a decision as to what should be done, whether to include the Stroud pro-
perty or exclude the Stroud property in the conveyance.
The County Attorney stated that he could not say what the County
would be getting into.
The County Attorney explained to the Board the phase "Doctrine of
color". He stated that once someone applied for title to property, assum-
ing there is a basis in the Grantor for having sufficient title to give
to someone or not, the person who takes and holds under color of title
seven years has obtained title to the property in effect. This is known
as "doctrine of color of title for adverse possession". This is effective
from conveyance to conveyance. Mr. Coleman stated that he was talking.
about property where there was no record of title ownership.
The County Attorney spoke of title reversion. He stated tha*_
'70
reversion would appJ.y to the Stroud tract depending on how you use the
property as to whether or not it will revert. If used for school purpose
- depends on the meaning of the words "school purposes". This could
create a serious problem.
Mr. CoJ.eman remarked that the status of the title could effect the
Grant or System monies.
One alternative to be considered is to go into Court and get a
declaration stating the a.ntended uses of the property and get a
declaratory judgment as to whether or not these uses would be in con-
flict with the deed. I3owever, all Stroud Heirs would have to be served
-' with this judgment.
A survey must be made in order to locate the Stroud property.
The County Attorney discussed alternatives which the 3oard could
procede with.
Discussion ensued as to whether or not a survey would show where
the Stroud property is located. The County Attorney stated that he could
not say whether a survey would provide this information.
The County Attorney asked permission of the Board to talk with the
State Department of Human Resources and discuss the present circumstances
and see i£ the grant will continue without a survey and as the property
title now 'exist.
The Board agreed for Mr. Caleman to talk with the Department of
Human Resouz-ces and to report back to the Board on the matter. f
The County Attorney trough to the Board's attention, on behalf of
the Building inspector, the matter of a Building Permit far an Asphalt
Plant to be located within the present town limits but outside the
present zoning district of the Town of Hillsborough. The Planning
Department approved this Building Permit.
The Board agreed that they had no discretion in this matter.
Items Ldumber 4 and 6 were deferred to a later meeting.
There being no further business to come before the Board, the
meeting was adjourned.
03\~.~~~.~~
Flora Garrett, Chairman
Betty June Hayes, Clerk
_ _ _ ,w.._a ..Y_~..r.~ ~-~.~. __ ...... .. ... _ ..., ... _
_ "~~ •
. ~ ~ ~ y.rF~• ~ORt1iv'CUi•1 Or TJir'Df:I2S1'~u~%37:C';G
O?:L1'-C;z3 SJxX. F1i`ii] C~1_2TE2 COY57a"siV1TIO.~i f]ZS:1:~YC~,
ti?~ •LIz3
Sa'•'!.. CO:iS::29!~~IQA`I SrI:VXGH, I;:3T]A
1oc1 the
CO~J.iiCY OF' 02:~iyG~, ~+O`;T;i GitiZ~.~.•«~
~h~.s 1`Ie=aaxa~J.u~=i o~ Un+lexsta-~•'.;-rg is i»t~rvicen 'th.e Ur~gs Sa•31
a,;z[7. L?a4eX Conae~vaL~azz 1]zs-s:xict, kzexe:ina-Etex ca'!'~ ecl. tre Aaatx~c•~,
aTad t::2 So~3. Co.YSexvatacz Service, 1lgrezna-ttex ca].:i_ed tl~e Sexva.C,=.y
aYzd •,:he Cs~~.n'ty v~ Oxa'~z~a, Noxth CaxaXzna, hexe:ina:Etex caa.led the
Coit1-~ty,
'the 1}j-st ;:ict, the Sexvzce, and the Ccunty liatTa tize coon
ol;;~ec•G:s.ve o~ heXnixzg •to U~:i:zg ahcu-G the Gansexva'~.ian, deve:op,~en'h,
and •rri.sc ti.se o'` Land, water ~*zd related xesouzces, They, tkxexc~ora,
e,-z•tex ~;zto this P•I~+oxs'~zc?:~z az Urdezstandzng as tize ~our_dation for an -
en :rxir_g eoop~xawive ~roxlting ac~ree~zent. _
EJ. uUx 'the •L'cr<as .off the Soa.7 Cvnsexvat~.an flct o~`. 7,935 ax:d athez
1~%s, the Soi3. Consexvatibn Service xs au-thoxfixed to coa~exa'ce *,~rith
aTttl 'tQ furnish s~.ssrsta=_ce •to the Dis uxi.ct fox cansexvation a`~.3 xe- .
SCUxGGr ~eVe:.4~L'J%en't ~~ioXfe .
Cuap iew 3.39, ~ti c3.e 7., o~ the Ge. excel S•taiL:tas o~ 1`Yort11
GaxoJ.ina establisiz2s t;ze Di.strzc't as a gcvez;~.ent~:3. subc'_ivzsion .o:~
-the State [~:E l~or th Caxozina :fo : the purpose ox` e::rzrcisi..ng pups ac
pa~aexs ari con:zec•4i on ['rAi:ll 1118 Gd:25ex~%a•G~ Gx~. an:1 eevYlop~ent . o~
soil, water, and xc:. ted xla'tu?'al xesoarcry..sa
C,iap-tex 1a3-9 o f •tae GenexaA 5•tatutes o ` ~cx•F,z _ Cz-:ro~zna
a,:truxi5e the C:-~~:z'ty to possess ~xnl exvy, arxrl e~;crcise a13. cf 'tFiose
rsoirezs conveyed 'by xa:r to the Cou,z±y ixx cl-xe s.. texest o~ the hea3.'4_i~ __.
sate•ty~ and genezal r.ol~are o~ ~.1 the resicle~.ts xeaiding :vith~n
-the co~afate 'i~a.'ts a'ad within the baur_daxies o~ the Cou+zty~
lv3lllx TI-I l". DCS"!'~2:'x ~7x[.I. DOz
1. t+7j,-th the lxe3.t> of the Co:tnty, Service, and o;.hezs, :v-iil devalan
7.xzd ke~e~n curxezzt a .long range pxogxax o~ riatuzaZ resource
2. T•la'~.e availalale 'to tJle Oaunty, and cvoxdirr.ate, sucih 'trc'r_xiical
assistance as ava3lab'±e, to assist tl~e Gounty xn helping to
bxing abcut the cansexvati on, dove' or:'aent, and •crisp use o:E ?and,
~ratex, a-id xelated Xesaurccso
3. J:'xavzde assistance to the Q~unty in accaxdance vrith tY~a annual
wox2c p3.an pxepaxed by •the p~stxxct wn consurtatio;i rrzth thn .County
and the Sarvxc4.
a.. 1'xov~.de assis+:~a-ce to t}ze county xn accozd:ance ~~r t?a pxxoxitaes
set by the Ccurty'~Eox the kind a-3d a,.nounts o~ teoxK to be pextoz:~.ed,
xncl.u~ng. h4xp tivith an e~~ectwve sev.~entation and exosxon con-
txal pxogx~..
5. l~txx~izsh •%he County annually an estataatc o~ the Bost of pxovzr7ing
ttzc 2cit.cYs and a~a•,uxts o~ assistance xec~aested by tha County.
6. Fxcva.de the County pxogress xeports an:ually, ax as requested,
shaaring ty, ~ and a-+xaunt o~ war1; cone.
7. rxcvide the County soi} survey intexpxetatians and xevie~r and
stake trxitt:.zx ca~r~.~nts on pxablPns of vra4ex dis~rvsal., dxa3nage,
erosion and sed3xaentation con•two3, bYauta.tication, pawlu•fian
control and related rnattexs as requested by the Coa;~ty.
[dHA:C THB SERFZCE L+TZI~.. Ja4:
~z
~:
I
~ .~
1. bladte avaxlab? e thxau.gh the Aistxict, such pexsnnne.~. as avail-
able to assist the County in he3pinr~ to bzzng about the cansex~
vatian, deve?apa~,ent, and wise use o~ "banal, tivatex and xc>).ated
rescsvxces_
2. 1'xovide assistance to the Jaistzict and Gour~%y in accaxdarce
ti.,a.th pryazitxes set by the llistrAct far tre lci.zxds and a~aunts
4~ SL'ox~C tQ 17G' pG~x.~C,'^:lYde .
3. Ass is-t the Gbunty in accordance ~;r tii an annual plat o~ eperatia?'A
prepared by •tlae Sc:xvi.ce xn cansuwtatian Wa.~th ahe JaistxwGt a"id -
•the C~ranty.
~. J3a xespons~.ble ~cax te[.•hn=.cal supervision a~ all ass:istarrcc pxa-
vi.ded t;Ze laistxict and the Ck~tinty.
5. Assist the Dzsttict a+nd the Grunty in esta'~lish:.ng and ~ainta=n'-n9
standards and s~~eci~ications ~o;, conaervaticn use acd txeat~ent
a~ land,
"73
Se A.ss:ist th4 Dzstr3.ct and the G,unty irx pxepaxi_zg znd a.mp ~eL`~.enting
x~:scuxce cans~rvation plans wzth n 'ch2 Z~,~ts outlined µbo•~av
i']HiT T":ir CG7T1xX WILT DO:
,l. I;cve? ep procr.~xes :c"ar th.. cxri.eriy and. pregxessxve ha.~d:~i*sc~ .
c~ xe:~`~^rra s to be sexviced. by tl~e Dis;.xzst, St si7.a',~ be
'the respnr_szUi z ity of 'the Cou:ztJ 'LP ir~o,:a xecip ie~~ts of
sex-,rites provided by the Ai strict aS these pxQG?~kres.
2. F~ resporsalale fox d4terainzng the xecipix~.ts o~ sexvices
pxav~.ded bq the D:s,stra.ct, vrit;i funds supplied by the C~a.nMy,
3. ii:xna.sls the pi stxzct annually, an est5.~ate of tha numbex o;E
xctexxal•s it t~rxl? s~:'oxait to the DistxiCt 3.n the cc~.ing yeax.
T:~e Gbunty ari?3 suit xts xe~exxal estiaate to the District
30 days be~oxe a budget estir+-iate is needed by the (]aunty.
.~. X3n resp axzsib:te fox such enfaxc~,ent as xpgaired to insure the
cor_sexvatXVn develop;~.ent azAd r:isa use o~ land, watex, and xe^
lata_3 xesouxces t~ixthin 'the Caazzty. Aevetapnent rrEll be da,.?
in accoxd~xce t~rit?'t appxavcd cansezvati.on plans and adopted
standards axed sp4cifXCatians,
XT 1S FU22~31;~ L1?~TDERS~D:
x. E:i.tk!ex paxty, as ~utua'! l.y agreed upon, rrxlx provide ox ar; auge
~dx s+sci~ additional services, facilitaes, equipr~ent, peate~a7.s,.
4nd arxangc~en'Es as raay be xeyuixed to achieve eczaaon o7ajectives,
?., 1'exsaxu~el and. ~aciliti Es o:~ the Gaunty, ttza Sexva_ce, aesd the
Dr,s'tri.ct sha?1 be undex the jurisdiction a:E th.eix respective
c:°:.playexss each retaining t,ie .rig~.e. to establish. readquart~xs
for its persan,-zsl. at such places as it de~*e.s rast ap_nropxiate.
3. rZin:~s s=~p~,lied the Di stxic•t by the Caixnty tvzll be txa;ts~exxed
to the treasurer o:f t:ze Dzstra.ct to be e:~ended at t:te d? x~t;.an
a:E she Distxwc':..
~. ~exSallnel. a_'~d ~acili-+.ies supplied tv~ i:Yi Cc;xnty funds sha? 3. bL
under the ad-zixzistrative ;;urisdiction o~ the wunty a;~d
teChxsica'?Iy xesponsable to 'tkze Disttrict Consexva'tionist c:t
tae Sc^."a"t11.cC.
i
i
!.
5, \?ithex the Cbunty, the I]istxxct, nox z!':.e aexvxce Qe n;:;z~+.u ay ~~
- any oU~ 3.gati.on in this Me--ipsand•:sa ox a_*xy Supp".e~~t thexety,
pr otk:.ex a~aoxcsj~x3.ate arxang~aents ~crh~.cu t':z3_]. involve '-.:he ex-~ ~
perclii:uxe o:~ funds :in e-.ccess o~ that auttxoxi~ed by Ia.v.
~ e ~'1 ~pple~F~rz'ta7. ~T_e~-PxarxrZtu~. p~ Undexstanc7.ing oz other a~o~zo~;.i.»
ate axxa:~ga.~.::r_ts norr ~.n ~.E~ect Ue->~rreen the A~stxict ~~ d the Sexvzcv
sha?~ xe~xain ~n ~u11. ~coxce and e~:~ecte
'7 0 ~'}ris P~:exxoranc? of Undexs'~and'irzg tvil3_ b2 e~~cct:ive tslien sign:~l.
by •%~ie -ti~re<. par4:i.es xnvo~vzcl, It may Taz ~~nd3~ied cx tv~:ninatccl
at any '!;-'%sae by ~zx'~ua1 careseat o~ the ~xax%ies hereto px ~xay be
'tcx:~it~a~ed by any cne of the paxties atone "by giving sia~y (60j
days ItOt~ C& zn Erza.ting %p the vthex.
OZ'~tiGE SOxI. 4~"`TD [4ATLR ~ ,`
GO~`rSE?V1~i7.rJ~ D7CST~TCT
cha~.~an FJ~~
7? 71E Sey timber 25, 3.975 i
~ .
Tne signing p~ •this d•:e~.norar_du-a o~ Understanding tsar authbriaeci by
a xeso~u4xon c~ thz rizst*-ict Gevexn2r_g Lady adcp-teel at 2 :,aeetj..rg ~ .
he1c1 pn men^e~b~r ~,S J.975,
_ ~f I
~ ;;cx~~ ^rang~ Saxes anti CVa'~ex
Consexvat3,cn. Ais'~x3.ct
Sente~bex 25, X975
17a•i;e
.ill/' ;
,~
0~2l~VGE COIJN~iC LOAM] r
Off' CU•{IXSSSO~ii~S r ~ ~,• .
_ ~
n_,~, Octo}~er 7, 1.975
~ ,
i
~'ize sign:~ng o~ this I~?~orand-.~ pf TJ~xderstandxng eras au-tnax:i ed b~~ a •
zesoZu•~icn oS thz Oxa~ge Coun4y $aaxd. o:E Ca,-~r.xss5.c;xexs at a r•.e2t_nr
~ieid on ~n ~, bPr XFi 3.975. f
Octobex ].0, ].975
l7a%s:
TJS~.=~.~ SiJxF CO;yST'~?~7<~.~~0.J SET,YVZGIi
LX _
State Cansryt~aticn.'~st