HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes - 19750804_. ~o
The Board agreed.
Upon motion of Commissioner Gustaveson, seconded by Commissioner
Whitted, it was moved and adopted that the Board place on the Agenda
the reading of the June 1$ minutes.
Upon motion of Commissioner Pinney, seconded by Commissioner
Gustaveson, it was moved and adopted that the minutes of June 18 be
approved.
There being no further business to came before the Board, the -
meeting was adjourned.
Flora R. Garrett, Chairman
Betty June Hayes, Glerk
ORANGE COUNTY BOARD OF COP4MISSIONERS
August 4, 1975
The Orange County Board of Commissioners met on Monday, August 4,
1975, at 10:00 o'clock a.m., in the Commissioners' Room of the Court-
house in Hillsborough, N. C.
Members present were: Commissioners Flora Garrett, .Jan Pinney,
Norman Walker and Richard E. Whitted.
Members absent: Norman Gustaveson.
Other present were S. M. Gattis, County Administrator, Neal Fvans,
Fiscal Officer; A. B. Coleman, Jr., and Steve Bernholz, County Attorneys;
and Betty June Hayes, Clerk to the Board.
Chairman Garrett stated that the Board needed to approve the P4inutes
of the June and July meetings.
The Minutes of June 2, 1975, were reviewed.
Upon motion of Commissioner Pinney, seconded by Commissioner TVhitted,
the Minutes of Jurie 2, 1975, were approved.
The Minutes of June 3, 1975, were reviewed.
Upon motion of Commissioner Walker, seconded by Commissioner Trlhitted,
the Minutes of June 3, 1975, were approved.
The Minutes of June 5, 1975, were reviewed.
Upon motion of Commissioner Pinney, seconded by Commissioner Whitted,
the Minutes of June 5, 1975, were approved.
The Minutes of June 10, 1975, were reviewed.
Upon motion of Commissioner Pinney, seconded by Commissioner Walker,
the Minutes of June 10, 1975, were approved.
The Minutes of June 12, 1975, were reviewed.
Upon motion of Commissioner Pinney, seconded by Commissioner Whitted,
the Minutes of June 12, 1975, were approved.
The Minutes of June 13, 1975, were reviewed.
Upon motion of Commissioner Pinney, seconded by Commissioner Whitted,
the Minutes of June 13, 1975, were approved.
~~
The PSinu'tes of. June 16, 1975, were reviewed.
Upon motion of Commissioner Finney, seconded by ~ro~n+~issioner TAhitted,
the (dins.,*.es of June lti, 1975 were apF~roved.
The Minutes of June 17, 1975, were reviewed and a correction to be
mane was pointed out.
Uaon motion o.f Cozmissioner ?]hitted, seconded by Carimissioner Pinney,
the Minutes of June 17, 1975, were approved subject to the indicated
correction.
The tdinutes of June 13, 1975, were approve~l on July 2r, 1975.
The P4inutes of June 26, 1975, were reviewed.
Upon motion of Commissioner Whitted, seconded by Commissioner Pinney,
the Min-~tes of .'une 26, 1975: were appravec'..
^he ~SinutPS of Jiliy 7, 197:x, were reviewed.
Upon motion of Commissioner Whitted, seconded by Commissioner Pinney,
the A-1ir.utes o.`_ July 7, 1975, wAre a~~nroveca.
"•"'_le ~`_inates of Ju;_ 1~, ?_g
y 7S, were .reviewer:.
Upon motion o.f commissioner Finney, seconc?ed by Cor~missionPr Tn7Zitted,
the .•!inutes of Juiy 19, 1975; tr~ere approved.
The Minutes of July 15, 197x, were rpviewe~a and an insertion ~•ias
suggested by the Board.
upon :'notion of Commissioner Tn?hit•~ed, secnn~le~_1 by Comr:ii,;szoner ??inney,
the Minutes of July 15, 1975, wera_ approve' subject to the suggested
insertion.
The .'.iii utes of July 4y, .1975, were revie~ted and corrections :vere
pointed ovL--.
UPo : *nation o.f Commissioner Finney, seronderi hy..Ccmmissioner '7hitted,
,the Dlinutes of ~7uly ?.4, 1975, were approvers, aubject to the suggested cor-
rections.
Regarding the July 24th Minutes, Commissioner Walker questioned the
action taker;, by the .aoard of
r.. 'v. Bateman. Fie ~ ~grrali~ation an~3. Review on the rec»est of
state__ tha~ Yr. Bateman hats atterptec? to get on the
agenda of the Board of equalization and Review and hats not been al-rle to
do so.
Commissioner Walker moved that the r3oard .reco;isider the Ricllar~a.
Bateman request.
The motion died for t'_1e laclc of a seconrs.
7iscussion ensued concerning the reasons for the poarrl's denial.
The Chairman directed the County P,rlministrator to ta1.k Tvi_t'.t the
Tax 5unervisor al;out the ratter and report bacle to the Foarci.
Chairman Garrett referred to Item ~ 1 on the Agenda: (A11 persons
desiring to present matters tr, the T3oarc? of Commissioner,, and who are
not on the printed agenda of this meeting should advise the Chairman
of their }?resence and the nature of their business.)
Chairman Garrett stated that Glenn ~~'hitfield and me~-hers of the
New Hope Improvement Association had requested the Board of Transportation
to revises tf?e si eeu 7_imit on Whitfield 'toad anti. t`rat a warning light be
installed nsar the moire Station and Rescae Sr~uad Buildings.
The Clerk was requested to write the Board of Transportation on
this matter.
22
Chairman Garrett referred to Item #2 on the Agenda: (A bus for
the Council on the Aging - County Commissioners have endorsed a request
from the Council on Aging to the State for acquisition of'a bus. Funds
to acquire this bus have been approved. Dr. Martin is to review with
the Board the matter of a driver and of operational casts.)
Dr. Charles Martin, Director of Council on the Aging stated that
the. Council was requesting transportation money in the amount of $2,100.00
to be applied toward a bus driver's salary. However, this amount would
be requested under Title XX.
Discussion ensued concerning a commitment by the Board for Matching
Funds for the purchase of a bus. Doctor Martin advised the Board that
the Council now needed $1,672.00 as local match for.the bus.
Further discussion ensued.
Upon motion of Commissioner Whitted, seconded by Commissioner
Pinney, it was moved and adopted that $1,672.00 be approved to the
Council on the Aging from the Contingency Fund for the purchase of a
bus.
Chairman Garrett referred to Item #3 on the Agenda: (Release of
Reading Program Funds: The 1975-1976 County budget carries a $226,0,00.00
contingency appropriation for reading improvement. Both .the County and
Chapel Hill School Units have been advised that to date their programs
have not been funded. They foresee little likelihood their programs
will be funded and are requesting the County release its contingency
appropriation. The appropriate division of these funds is, Chapel Hill
$116,570.80; and the County $109,429.20.)
It was painted out that the two school units had expected the State
to appropriate the funds needed for the continuation of the Reading Pro-
grams. However, at this date no one was aware if the State funds would
be forthcoming. The County Administrator advised the Board that the
School Boards needed to be advised of whether or not the funds would
be appropriated due to the fact that school opens in less than a month
and plans had to be made if the Reading Programs were to be continued.
Discussion ensued. The Board expressed the concern about the expendi-
tures of these monies if the State decided to appropriate funds for the
Reading Programs. It was agreed that the Board could appropriate the
monies to the School Boards with the understanding that these monies
would revert to the County if the State decided to fund these programs.
Upon motion of Commissioner Walker, seconded by Commissioner Pinney,
it was moved and adopted that the County appropriate from the Contingency
Fund to the Chapel Hill-Carrboro School Board the sum of $116,570.80; and
to the County School Board the sum of $109,429.20, with the understanding
that if the Reading Programs are funded by the State then this appropria-
tion is to be returned to the County.
The Chairman referred to Item #4 on the Agenda: (A Resolution adjust-
ing Fees at the joint Landfill effective August 15, 1975.)
The County Administrator advised the Board that the tonage in the
Landfill was not reaching the expectations. Therefore, the towns of
Carrboro and Chapel Hill felt that the fees need to be adjusted. Mr.
Gattis filed with the Board a copy of the Landfill Budget that had been
reviewed by the Fiscal Officer.
Upon motion of Commissioner Pinney, seconded by Commissioner Whitted,
the fallowing Resolution was unanimously adopted.
"WHEREAS Carrboro, Chapel Hill, and Orange County have organized
to operate a landfill, and
WHEREAS operation of the landfill is administered by the Town of
Chapel Hill with the approval of Carrboro and Orange 'County, NOW
THEREFORE:
BE IT RESOLVED by the Orange County Board of Commissioners that the
Landfill Fees will be as follows:
~3
Regular garbage and trash
Construction and demolition
materials
Stumps
Logs
Tires
Trash and Garbage Delivered in:
cars
pick-up trucks
$ 2.50/ton
4.50/ton
4.50/ton
4.50/ton
4.50/ton
1.00 flat Rate
2.00 flat rate"
Chairman Garrett referred to ltem #5 on the Agenda: (A review of
the Appointment of Ms. Mae McLendon to the County Social Service Board.)
Chairman Garrett recognized Ms. Ronnie Allred, Assistant to the
State Commissioner of Social Services. Mrs. Garrett stated that the
letters of appointment of rlae McLendon had to be returned and she
inquired of D1s. Allred as to the reason for this action.
Ms. Allred replied that the letters were returned due to the fact
that an oath of office was`not affixed to the form and •that this was
required by the State Commission.
Steve Bernholz, County Attorney, read from the General Statutes
and the North Carolina Constitution.
Discussion ensued concerning the General Statutes of North Carolina
as they related to the eligibility of Ms. McLendon.
Ms. Allred advised the Board that under the current Standards of
the State Social Services Commission Ms. McLendon was not eligible for
appointment to the local Social Services Board. However, the Standards
for membership are established by the State Social Services Board and
that if this Board agreed to change their policy relative to Section 5
then Ms. McLendon could be seated. She stated that the State Social
Service Commission would hold its next meeting in Raleigh on Wednesday,
August 20, 1975, and that the Board could appear to request the State
~ ~ Board to reconsider Section 5.
Discussion ensued.
Chairman Garrett stated that since it had been suggested by Ms.
Allied, Commissioner Walker, and the County Attorney, the Board would
agree to appear before the State Social Services Commission on August
20th. Mrs. Garrett said that this will mark the first time, to her
knowledge, that the regulation has been challenged by a County Board
of Commissioners.
Commissioner Walker stated that he would agree to attend the
August 20th meeting in Raleigh.
Commissioner Whitted stated that he wished the County Board tp
request to appear on the State Social Services Board Agenda.
Commissioner Pinney inquired as to what exactly are the grounds
on which the County Board is appearing to the State Social Service
Board? Commissioner Whitted replied that the Board was questioning
Regulation #5.
Ms. Allred agreed to secure a ruling from the Attorney General
- on the question of whether or not Section 5 of the State requirements
are constitutional and she will share the ruling with the Board.
Upon motion of Commissioner Whitted, seconded by Commissioner
Pinney, it. was moved and adopted that the Board request to appear on
the Agenda of the State Social Services Commission meeting on Wednesday,
August 20, 1975.
Chairman Garrett referred to Ttem #6 on the Agenda: (A report
from the Chairman: Creation of a County Youth Council.)
David Lutz and Laura Detwiler were recognized by Chairman Garrett
and David Lutz reviewed the purposes and goals of the proposed Youth
Council.
t% ~4 Laura Detwiler requested that two members of County Commissioners'
Board assist in the organizing of a County Youth Council. Chairman
Garrett and Commissioner Whitted volunteered to work with the group
on a temporary basis. Commissionezs Walker and Pinney stated that they
would like to be advised of the Organizational Meeting.
Chaixman Garrett referred to Ttem #7 on the Agenda: (Adoption of
"Assurances"in connection with the change of Grantee Resolution oon-
cerning the Mental Health Building Renovation Grant.)
It was painted out that the matter of the Assurances were pre-
sented to the Board on July 7th, however, the action taken was not _.
clear as to the formal adoption of the Assurances.
Discussion ensued.
Upon motion of Commissioner Pinney, seconded by~Commissioner
Whitted, it was moved that the Board adopt the Assurances and have
the Chairman sign the Certification Certificate.
Commissioner Walker questioned the filling out of the forms as
to the amount of monies Orange County would be committed.
Further discussion ensued.
Chairman Garrett called for a vote on the motion.
Commissioners Garrett, Pinney and Whitted voted aye.
Commissioner Walker voted nay.
Chairman Garrett declared the motion passed.
Chairman Garrett referred to Item#8 on the Agenda: (Agencies that
filed requests for Title XX Programs with the Aepartment of Social
Services have been advised the County will hear any requests for County
funds to provide part or all of the local matching funds at this time.)
Chairman Garrett recognized Tom Ward, Director of the Orange
County Social Services Department.
Mr. Ward stated that in most instances each agency that had sub-
mitted an application for funds under Title XX was now requiring lest
than appeared an the first application.
Chairman Garrett recognized Dr. Charles Martin, Executive Director
of the Council on Aging.
Dr. Martin filed the Council's request for Title XX-funds.
(Copy of Council on Aging Request see Minute Docket Book 9•, Page 29 .)
Chairman Garrett recognized the Welfare Rights Union.
Donald Baker was spokesman far the group.
Mr. Baker filed a request for Title XX funds.
(copy of Welfare Rights Union Request see Minute Docket Book 5,
Page .)
Mr. Ward advised the Board that the State has rejected the applica-
tion filed by the Welfare Rights Union as the "In-kind" services listed
were not acceptable to the guidelines as a local match. Mr. Ward stated -
further that his understanding of the guidelines meant monies in-hand
and each application would be for a nine month funding period.
Chairman Garrett recognized the Orange County bay-Care Coalition.
Lynn Gunn was spokesman for the group.
(Copy of Orange County Day-Care Coalition Request see Minute Docket
Book 9, Page 30 .)
Ms. Gunn proceded to review the needs o:~ the Day~Gare unit and 25
stated that if the Coalition had a priority it would be Proposal #1.
Chairman Garrett recognized the Joint Orange~Chatham Community
Action Service. Floyd Wicker, Executive Director, was spokesman for
this Agency,
(Copy of Joint Orange-Chatham Community Action Service R:cluest
see Minute Doc]cet Book .4 , Page 27 , )
Mr. ?wicker tzen reviewed the request. and stated that the Agency's
- first priority weuld be the Feeding Program.
The T.aoman's wealth and Pregnane_y Counseling Service was the next
name on the list of Agencies.
No one appeared on behalf of the Organization.
Chairman Garrett recognized CRIB and Incorporation.
Francis Muth amd Marilyn Tyroier represented this Agency.
Pa (3 °py of. CRIB and incorporation ;:request see "-4nute Docket Book 9,
ge )
Chairman Garrett recognized thQ Orange-Chatham-Person Mental i3eal.th
Center.
Rolfs Pinkerton was spokesman for the Center. Mr. Pinkerton did
not file any *.aritten material with the Clerk, he did, however, present
the =ollowing verbal request;
Day Care and Development Training/Mental Retarded $ 1,333.00
outpatient-Alcoholic ar_d Drug Addict 2,500.00
Transportation Alcoholic and Drug Addict 1,000.00
Counseling 2nformation - Alcoholic and Drug referrals 5,000,00
Personal and Family Counsel - Alcoholic 833.p0
i Geriatric Program - Day Care for Adults 7,291.00
Total $ 17,957.00
Chairman Garrett deferrer? from the Agenda to recognize Terry
Woods who read a letter t_'~at will be circulated to elected representa
tives relative to the proposed Eno River State Park issue and a meeting
scheduled for ^'hursday, August 7, 1975, at 7:30 p.m. in the Orange
County Courthouse in Hillsborough.
Chairman Garrett recognized B. M. Sessoms, Attorney for Curtis
Banes and wife. Mr. .Sessoms informed the Board that in 1970 his
clients requested that their property located in Eno Township be rezoned
to accompany 150 mobile homes. Approval was denied. In 1972, the
Banes reapplied by reducin.~ the number of mobile homes to 50 and aouroval
was granted on the condition that a Recreation Area be provided. The
Banes have met all of the requirements set forth'in 1972, however, are
only now able to procede with their plans and now the Zoning Ordinances
have cranged and the Banes are told that they cannot use the same plans
that they proposed to use in 1972 due to the changes in the Zoning
Ordinances.
Mr. Sessoms was told that his clients should go back to the
Planning Board. The'Planning Board will review and inform the Board
of Commissioners of their findings.
"' Chairman Garrett referred to Item #9 on the Agenda: (Plats)
A. Carl B. Sparrow: (Planning Board approved this item on July
21, 1975).
Mr. Edwards stated t]1at both lots of the Sparrow property now abutt
on a 60 foot road.
Upon mption of Commissioner Whitted, seconded by Commissioner Pinney,
it was moved and adopted that the preliminary plat be approved.
26
B. J. C. Garrett: (Planning Board approved this plat on July
21, 1975):
The Board was informed by Mr. Edward's that Mr. Garrett had requested
a variance on pavement.
Discussion ensued relative to the paving of roads in subdivisions.
The County Attorney and Chris Edwards were instructed to prepare
proposed amendments of Zoning Ordinance to be presented at the Public
Hearing concerning minor subdivisions and paving of streets and ease-
ments. Mr. Edwards in to return to the County Commissioners before the
Public Hearing to review the suggested amendments. -
The matter of Mr. Garrett was deferred until the third Tuesday of
August.
C. Cedar Hills Subdivision: (The Planning Board approved the pre-
liminary plat on July 21, 1975 - This plat was referred to the
Chapel Hill Planning Department. This Department made sixteen
comments concerning the plat. The County Planning Board concurred
with fourteen'of these comments.)
Recommendations made by the Chapel Hill Planning Department were dis-
tributed. Mr. Edwards stated that the County Planning Department con-
curred with fourteen of the recommendatidns. The County Planning Department
request that Number 4 and 15 be omitted and Number 7 be changed to read
"Homeowner" instead of developer. The County Planning Department also
recommend that Number 11 be approved by the State.
Item #6 - Chapel Hill is to send a letter stating that they will pro-
vide water and a way of accessment from Saddle Ridge Road within 60
days.
Upon motion of Commissioner Pinney, seconded by Commissioner Whitted,
it was moved and adopted that the Board approve the preliminary plat for
Cedar Hills subject to'ihe fourteen stipulations set out.
Vote: Ayes 4; Nay 0.
Chairman Garrett deferred from the Agenda to review the Chi Plat
Upon motion of Commissioner Pinney, seconded by Commissioner Whitted,
it was moved and adopted that the Chi plat be approved.
D. Rufus Farrington: (The Planning Board approved the Final Plat on
July 21, 1975 - This is a minor subdivision.)
Mr. Edwards stated that this property was located on SR #1939 and
that a perk test is not required.
Upon motion of Commissioner Pinney, seconded by Commissioner Whitted,
it was moved and adopted that the Farrington Plat be'approved.
Commissioner Walker left the meting at this point.
E. Vann Evans: (The Planning Board approved this plat on July
21, 1975. This is a minor subdivision.)
n
Upon motion of Commissioner Pinney, seconded by Commissioner Whined,
it was moved and adopted that the Evans Flat be approved.
F. A. J. Altemueller: (The Planning Board approved this Plat on
July 21, 1975. This is a minor subdivision.)
Mr. Edwards stated that a 60 feet easement is to be retained for
future extension of Weaver Dairy Road.
Upan motion of Commissioner Whitted, seconded by Commissioner Pinney,
it was moved and adopted that the Altemueller Plat be approved.
G. James T. Farrington: (The Planning Board approved this plat on
July 21, 1975.)
'f~
~3J~8~ ~ . a7ii~~1d3~~
~.: ~~'•'
S`;,'
August 4
Orange county Commissioners - -..:.-
-.
Supplemental Request Statemenk-Title XIC Funds
',7o3nt Orange Chatham requests a sum of $16,000 be committed
in ozder to employ an attorney with commitment to and background
in the practice of "Poverty Law " as a means of initiating a
i
working Legal Service for limited income county residents.
~ This lawyer could carry out individual legal services far non-
f fee generating cases and court situations where there is na provision for
a court appointed law}*er. We anticipate major activities would
be in. domestic areas and consumer protection-fraud cases. This
Office, with JOGCA clerical and outreach support would also be
significently useful. in serving limited income groups with lega].
and organizational issues , cooperatives economic ventures and
problems of a class action natuze We believe poor people need
access to 1egal~remedy in matters which often go beyond the Existing
volunteer resource available informally. This person could develop -
a coordination with the operating lawyer referral through the.Tnter-
Church Council .
This' w-ii ]. involve emn~oyin$ a lam; sr wish salary of $.16,000 (incl«d?s
~ fzinges) ---,T000A providing office space,clerical and.transpartation.,
I
I Orange county cost---$4000 :Federal cost--$12000: TOTAL $16,D00
P.O. BOX 27 - PITTSBORO, NORTH CAROLINA 27312 • (9"19) 542•h781 - (ORANGE COUNTY (979) 929-04?4}
~7
~...-.._.._.._.__..~.~..._......_._ _..,.._.w-._~~.~..__~.._._.._._..~.w,....._.__.__......~__
-~~ ...
as 9 ~~ ---
~_ ggyy:p~ ~~iy ~.
6339~7l~ ~s FLOYa W, WICKER
I 37~
~~~~~~4 ~ ;. ~~~~~ Executive pirector
i :~ I }
i .,..
i " AUGUS T4
i ,
__
oR~,NCE couNTY corn~rssroNERS . - . - - - - -=- - - -- - - - -- - - --,._::.. .
SUPPLEMENTAL REQUEST STATEA~NT-TITLE XX FUNDS
.. .Toint Orange Chatham CAA requests a sum of $25,050 be coamiitted
for the purpose o£ supplementing available resources for older
persons. Currently, through triangle 1, the newly opened(,7uly 7)
Cedar Grove meal site has bean averaging over 20 persons dally.
The Cafeteria there is well underway and 3pCCA wishes to continue
`I and extend this capability to meet the needs of drange County~s
.I 'older community. Based on staff knowledge, coumtunity statements,
I and the decided lack of groug care facilities,we are convinced that
a basic heals on Wheels program will serve to increase the comfort
' and security of persons who are limited in travelling, aad regulazly
provide contact with outside friends through the delivery of a hot
meal. In order to effectively conduct this service, we propose the
f following budget. -
! Senior Citizen Specialist salary includes fringes) -..__6600
recruitment-support-coordination
7
Van- with provision for thermal food protection -
--6000
Sus Driver (salary includes fringes) ---6000
_ Meals 30 at$1.25 per meal for 172 days(Oct.--June) -~--6450
total--25,050
Orange County cost= $6262, Federal cost=$18,7$$
P.D. BDX 27 - pITTSBDRO, NORTH CAROLINA 27312 • (9i 9) 542.47$7 • (DRANGE COUNTY (919) 929-p494)
...,~
..:.,..~ . .._ R .,.
- - y.:
- .~
. M,-, ,,.......~ - - - -
_ - - - _ ~~~~~ 29
-- - (~
ORANGE COUriii ~~~~*CR, Old AGING, INC.
REQUEST TO ORANGE ,,;~"R-R`i;^y COMMISSIONERS
FOR
NEW BSS AND TITLE $S MATOt~.`'$G F[JNDS
August !~, 1975
New $us
- On March 3, 1975 the Board of Commissioners approved the applica~cn -.. --. --_-
of the Council an Aging to the State of North Carolina fora new~bus. The
application has been approved. No funds have been placed in the budget to
date for matching money, .
Cost Federal Grant Local Match
w8,360 $6,688 $1,672
Title ~ - A~plioations
The Council on Aging has filed the following applications with the
Department of Social Services for Tit~.a X,% funds.
Cost Federal Grant Local Match
1. Transportation $ 7 100 $ 5, 550 $1, 850
2. Chore Service L.,l~00 3,300 1,10D
3. Persona]. Oounse7a.ng 8 DO 6 2125
TOTAL $20,30D
$1 ,22
Thera can now be reduced as follows:
Cost Federal Grant Local 1~atch
1. Transportation ~ 2,100 $ 1,575 $ 525
2. G~.ore 5eraice
3,300 2,75
82
5
3'. Personal Counseling 6 375 11 781
TOTAL ll
1 9!t
8, 31 X2,9
f
Y
-_-.-~---.-. _ _- .- D
OC3
~'Q'
.. _ ----- - ~To- .~!r.G~.~ __-_ vucn,ae_,,~.Q.cc..Q,~-~. ~ - ~ ~-..~U ice. __ --
_~~ _~.~____~2__
__w~~_~c~.Q~..
a.,~- --p~v~cc,~..e...
. __ _..
~.e,Q.~~-- ____
---
..
Ry,~~.C ~ .~~~,.pr, aeocc ".
_ l
' TIh1ETAQLE
~. Establishment of CRTB,IhlC.., and Projected Dates for CRIB Home
Incorporation of CRIB November 30, 1973
Election of Board of pirectors 1'~ovemaer Z5,Z973
House Rental ( Roherson St.
• Chapel Hill, N.C.) March 1, 1974 __ _
House Occu arc Availibilit March 1, 1974;
~. p Y Y
Staff Employment Febrzdary , Z:)74 -~
Application Processing Februcz:c~. 2974
Salaries
Consultants, CPA
House Parents
Fringe Bene6its
Housing;
fient and occupancy
Utilities
Rep is and t4aintenance,ins~z~NcE
Foo~for House Parents, Residents and
Babies
Operating Expenses (including Postage
and consumable supplies?
Telephone
^ravel and Transportation
Prq~ram Ex?enses
Advertising
Resident rather allokences
Gen. Entertainment
$].,200.00
6,500.00
330.00
3,600.00
1,200.Op
500.00
2,500.00 estimate
200.00
150.00
200.00
4,000.00
50.00
624.00
loo.ao
3;
The approval of this plat was deferred until after the amendments
are presented concerning the Zoning Ordinances
H. Poplar Ridge Subdivision: (The Planning Board approved this
plat July 21, 1975.)
The approval of this plat was deferred until after amendments
are presented relative to the Zoning Ordinances.
The Chairman then referred to Item #10 on the Agenda: (701 Planning
Grant: The County has been awarded a 701 Planning Assistance Grant.
_ The requirements are (1) Approval of Contract with State Department of
Natural and Economic Resources and (2) Approval of Resolution Authorizing
the Chairman to execute contract.)
The County Manager stated that he and Commissioner Whitted had
reviewed the 701 Planning Grant and that Chairman Garrett needed to
sign the Contract and the Commissioners needed to adopt the Resolution.
"Commissioner Jan Pinney introduced the following Resolution,
which was read:
'BE IT RESOLVED, by the Board of Commissioners of the County of
Orange:
1) That the contract between the County of Orange and the
North Carolina Department of Natural and Economic Resources
be and the same is hereby approved.
2) That the Chairman and the Clerk be and they are hereby
authorized to sign and execute the said contract for and on
behalf of the County of Orange and forward the same to the
North Carolina Department of Natural and Economic Resources.
3) That upon final execution a copy of the said contract be
filed with the minutes.'
Upon motion of Commissioner Jan Pinney, seconded by Commissioner
Richard Whitted, said resolution was unanimously passed."
Vote: Ayes 3; Nay 0.
Chairman Garrett referred to Item #11 on the Agenda (Report by the
Chairman on Meeting with Chapel Hill and Carrboro Representatives to
discuss overlapping of County and City Services.
Mrs. Garrett reviewed a Memorandum regarding a Proposal of Orange
County Interjurisdictional Study Committee on Services and Taxation
received from Burt Jenne, Assistant Town Manager of Chapel Hill.
Mrs. Garrett stated that a Study Committee is to.be set up and that
their charge will be "TO study the current structure of service delivery
by the four local government jurisdictions in Orange County, to study the
current fiscal structure of and amotmg those jurisdictions which exist to
support the delivery of those services, and to recommend to the four
governing bodies, action which can be taken in cooperation with each other
toward making the delivery of services more cost effective, toward elimi-
nating duplication of services, wherever possible, and toward providing
an equitable fiscal structure to support such a system of service delivery."
Chairman Garrett referred to Item #12 on the Agenda: (Awarding
Contracts for (A) Refuse Collection Truck and (B) Sixty "Green Boxes."
A representative from Roach-Russell was recognized who stated that
he did not bring a box to show, but he did have picture for the Commis-
sioners to view.
A representative from Solid Waste System was recognized and he stated
_ that he had brought with him a box for the Commissioners to inspect. The
box was located on the Courthouse parking area.
The Board deferred action regarding awarding a contract for the
"Green Boxes."
There being no further business to come before the Board, the
meeting was adjourned.
Flora R. Garrett, Chairman
Betty June Hayes, Clerk